#tech hype

[stevensavage]

The Money In Cleanup

I have an acquaintance that helps migrate businesses off of ancient and inappropriate databases onto more recent ones. If you wonder how ancient and inappropriate let me simply state “not meant for industry” and “first created when One Piece the anime started airing” and you can guess. Now and then he literally goes and cleans up questionable and persisting bad choices.

In the recent unending and omnipresent discussions of AI, I saw a similar proposal. A person rather cynical about AI mused someone might make a living in the next few years backing a company’s tech and processes OUT of AI. Such things might seem ridiculous, until you consider my aforementioned acquaintance and the fact he gets paid to help people back out past decisions. Think of it as “migration from a place you shouldn’t have migrated to.”

It’s weird to think in technology, which always seems (regrettably) to be about forward motion and moving forward that there’s money in reversing decisions. Maybe it was the latest thing and now it’s not, or maybe it seemed like a good idea at the time (it wasn’t), but now you need someone to help you get out of your choice. Fortunately there are people who have turned “I told you so” into a service.

I find these “back out businesses” to be a good and needed reminder that technology is really not about forward. Yeah, the marketing guys and investors may want it, but as anyone who’s spent time in the industry knows, it’s not the case. Technology is a tool, and if the tool doesn’t work or is a bad choice, you want out of it. The latest, newest, fasted is not always the best - and may not be the best years later. Technology is not always about forward, even if someone tells you it is (before they sell you yet another new gizmo).

Considering the many, many changes in the world of tech, from social media to search to privacy, I wonder how much more “back out businesses” might evolve. Will there be coaches to get you to move to federated social media? How can you help a company get out of a bad relationship with a service vendor with leaky security and questionable choices? For that matter can we maybe take a look at better hosting arrangements and websites that aren’t ten frameworks in a trenchcoat?

I don’t know, and the world is in a terribly unpredictable state. But I’m amused to think that somewhere in my lifetime the big tech boom might be “oops, sorry.” Maybe we can say “moving away is really moving forward,” get some TED talks, and make not making bad immediate choices cool.

Steven Savage

www.StevenSavage.com

www.InformoTron.com

[wat3rm370n]

All the nightmares of AI in hospitals.

Tracking everything a patient says in the ICU in order to deny nurses the ability to complain about unsafe staffing levels.

.coda - I’m a neurology ICU nurse. The creep of AI in our hospitals terrifies me     By Michael Kennedy and Isobel Cockerell - 12 November 2024 We felt the system was designed to take decision-making power away from nurses at the bedside. Deny us the power to have a say in how much staffing we need. That was the first thing. Then, earlier this year, the hospital got a huge donation from the Jacobs family, and they hired a chief AI officer. When we heard that, alarm bells went off — “they’re going all in on AI,” we said to each other. We found out about this Scribe technology that they were rolling out. It’s called Ambient Documentation. They announced they were going to pilot this program with the physicians at our hospital.  It basically records your encounter with your patient. And then it’s like chat GPT or a large language model — it takes everything and just auto populates a note. Or your “documentation.” There were obvious concerns with this, and the number one thing that people said was, “Oh my god — it’s like mass surveillance. They’re gonna listen to everything our patients say, everything we do. They’re gonna track us.”

[bravecrab]

[gwydionmisha]

Debunking the Tech Hype Cycle with Dan Olson

[ibboard]

"The only areas where AI delivers the goods are spamming, scamming and shamming" 😆

Here’s an interesting take. We’ll see how much truth there is in it over time.

(Immediate response to this proposition, though: Good. It’s caused enough damn trouble already.)

[here-comes-the-moose]

Wrecker: Do you think I could fit fifteen marshmallows in my mouth?

Tech: You’re a hazard to society.

Crosshair: And a coward, do twenty.

[valdevia]

You make AI gen abominations? You make fake MRIs and xrays. What else do you make with AI?

You got it the other way around you tech bro weirdo. It's AI who makes abominations using the work it stole from me. Now kindly fuck off :)

[billfinarts]

Techchosis

He's fine y'all.

[ohnoohnoohnoohnoohnosblog]

^^ this

This is the most important response to “AI is going to replace all the jobs”

#MarcusHutchins

[brandyy0moss]

[cornleypolytechnicgoeswrong]

More of my favourite low effort CPDS Members as my screenshotted tiktok comments memes for you as an apology for being so inactive and proof I am still around hehe <33

[wat3rm370n]

Solar geoengineering is climate engineering rooted in tech hype. It is not something climate scientists are pushing, indeed, many are pushing against leaning on these hopium fantasies, especially since they appear to be hyped to help industry delay doing anything else.8 It also seems that climate deniers are starting conspiracy theories to assert that “cloud seeding” is to blame as a cause of torrential rains that cause flooding, rather than climate change itself.

Many references to “climate engineering” are actually a part of climate denial & disinfo narratives.

When media attempts to both-sides coverage of climate engineering disinfo, they walk right into the hands of controlled opposition, led up the garden path by tech hype decoys.

https://chloehumbert.substack.com/p/climate-engineering-part-of-climate-denial

It may appear superficially that “two sides” of an issue have been represented, but in reality it winds up meshing together things like cloud seeding, solar geoengineering, and conspiracy theories about chemtrails, and then calling all that “rooted in conspiracy theory and climate science” when what they’re really talking about is a right-wing crackpot insurrectionist who is pushing nonsense legislation, and fanciful and flawed climate engineering concepts rooted in tech hype. It seems poised to smear climate activists, experts, and officials, who call for regulation of reckless tech hype solutions as rooted in conspiracy theory the same as election deniers and crackpots.

[halfling-myth-lady]

How tf have I ricocheted into two Greek mythology fandoms that have no business being this good while still unfinished that I have also joined in the most convenient time plausible.

[butchhansolo]

ok it goes like this hunter has cake wrecker has cake echo and tech are average and crosshair's ass would break your hand if you tried to slap it

[techtainia-makes-things]

TFOne, but make it 1920s

I found out that Iacon was inspired by art deco, and Hadestown is such a Megatron musical. It’s 1920’s time! I used a couple of ads from the era as reference.

[spiderman2-99]

What is your opinion about ai? (Specifically ai art and ai music (ai music means that the ai is making its own music using someone else’s voice or using its own voice))

AI art is theft.

Music is more nebulous (in my opinion). Theoretically, you could do a lot of interesting things with it if done right-- like Haircuts for Men, Frostbite Orckings-- or as, say, an assist, but it should never take the place and rights of real human artists.