#tax accountant lawyer

[docureadyinc]

Best divorce attorney services in Tampa

At Docuready Inc., provide the best divorce attorney services in Tampa, Fl and surrounding areas. Our expert experienced team is here to support you through every step of the process. We help you navigate this challenging time with confidence and expertise. Contact us today!

Service Area: https://maps.app.goo.gl/caL54SPyb7ggtcMs6

Driving Direction: https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZnpN3HUdSFoFFptq7

KGMID: https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11vy2crtlk

Area Map: https://maps.app.goo.gl/qD463gcmWT1zrLCd6

[baronmagikcarp]

I'm curious as to the tax rate. The highest personal tax rate I know is about 45% on things like bonuses and winnings. That comes to $900M in taxes which still leaves $1.1 billion. They're talking about a 78% tax rate if all that's left is $424M.

I'm betting what happened is two things. One, the OP is trying to stir anti-tax sentiments and isn't being fully honest (or just flat lying). If they're just being shady and not flat lying, it's probably something like the winner is taking the cash payout instead of the annuity. That's a huge cut right there. Then, of course, the regular tax on that and then reporting the reduced amount without reporting the step in the middle. That's without doing any research, just based off what I know of taxes and lottery payouts.

So let's research really quick.

Forbes reported on this and their estimate was $628M. That was based on taking the payout (which cut that prize amount in half basically).

So yeah, the response is pretty true, billionaires should be taxed more, but OP is more than likely trying to stir anti-tax sentiment. Just my two bits.

[legalservices-world]

Law Firm in Nepal : Reliance Corporate Advisors

Reliance Corporate Advisors (RCA) is a premier professional service firm in Nepal, established as an associate of Reliance Law Firm in 1995, offering a wide range of corporate advisory services. The firm comprises a dedicated team of corporate lawyers and chartered accountants who specialize in various sectors, including foreign investment, corporate litigation, and financial advisory services. RCA is committed to delivering expert legal and financial solutions tailored to meet the unique needs of its clients, ensuring both immediate and long-term success.

Key Points Reliance Corporate Advisors is associated with Reliance Law Firm, established in 1995. The firm offers comprehensive corporate advisory services in Nepal. RCA specializes in areas like foreign investment, business incorporation, and dispute resolution. The firm's expertise extends to sectors such as banking and finance, labor law, and intellectual property law. RCA includes a team of skilled professionals, including some of the top lawyers and advisors in the country. The firm aims to deliver effective legal and financial guidance to meet clients' diverse needs. RCA is committed to helping clients achieve both short-term and long-term objectives.

For more details please visit: https://reliancecs.co/

[summerhighlandfalls]

if your lawyer has a tumblr your ass is getting acquitted

[mmbaaccountantss]

Why Legal Firms Need Expert Tax Advisory Services

 Legal firms operate within a highly regulated environment, requiring meticulous attention to financial details and compliance. Whether it's managing SRA accounts or conducting audits, the complexities of legal accounting demand expertise and precision. With our specialized tax advisory services, we help law firms navigate these challenges while optimizing their financial strategies for growth and sustainability. 

[australiantax]

Tax Accountant Service For Retail | Australian Tax Specialists

At Australian Tax Specialists we help Small to medium Retail businesses in Australia with their Tax & Accounting Solutions. We understand that as Tax Accountant For Retail your main priority is Cash Flow, and you need an Accountant who can Save you money on taxes and advice you if you are making money on your operations. Best Accountants for Retail Business, We specialize in this sector,and we provide maximum value to retail business owners.

Visit Us : https://australiantaxspecialists.com.au/retail-industry-accountant

[haveihitanerve]

Dad How Do I but with Bruce Wayne.

Bruce who teaches life advice- showing kids how to tie a tie, how to tie their shoes, braid their hair, teaching young adults to do taxes, to surf, the best lawyers to hire when in trouble, how to avoid scams, he educates the less fortunate on the best places to get free food, where to go in Wayne Enterprises for a hot shower and some toiletries, how to eat at formal functions so the higher elite have one less thing to criticize them on. He teaches people how to do card tricks and make your niece laugh by pulling out a quarter from behind her ear, teaches moms how to rock their baby to sleep properly, teaches teens to do front flips and cartwheels and calculus, educates them on how to write job applications and two weeks notice letters. He teaches people to sew, to cook(alfred helps) to assemble an IKEA shelf, how to work a lawn mower, and all sorts of different things. And when his son dies… Bruce uses his account to share his grief, his story, shares everything about Jason, what a delight he was, how awesome he was, how much he loved to read and school… and then one day, he gets Batman to join a video. And the hero is stiff and everyone can see the exhaustion, the anger and sadness in his joints, his movements, radiating off him. But he sits down heavily into the chair Bruce Wayne had previously vacated… and begins to speak. He tells the story of Robin, his young child sidekick, who just like Jason Wayne, was murdered by the Joker. He tells everyone how his little boy tried to save Jason Todd, and how they both perished in the aftermath. He tells people about his grief, his anger, and why Batman is suddenly harsher and hurts more. “Because I hurt more.” he confesses quietly, and the people finally get to meet the man behind the mask (figuratively) and truly get to see who their hero really is. The account’s popularity skyrockets, and soon Batman is a lot more common to be seen, teaching people how to defend themselves and handle the Batarangs he knows they collect after he fights. Nightwing shows up too sometimes, teaching more elegant flips and tricks and they demonstrate their workout together, and a few months later, Batman shyly introduces his new Robin, same messy black hair as the one before, but slightly smaller, and theres something… more behind those lenses in his mask. But the kid is soon a fan favorite, making sarcastic comments and countering Nightwings witty remarks, and the people get to see a new side of Batman, get to watch as he rolls his eyes at them, as he uses them to teach people how to disguise themselves, ways to use clothes to stem blood, tie tourniquets. 

Then Red Hood returns. And a kid in Crime Alley catches him cursing at his jacket because a button fell off and he cant get it back on. “Um! Mr. Red Hood sir?” the kid pipes anxiously. Red Hood turns to him, angry, but the kid doesn't back down and just goes “You should watch ‘Mr. Wayne How Do I: Sewing’ it'll help.” and then he scampers off. And Jason is pissed and even more angry because of course while he was dead Bruce decides to become a father to everyone in Gotham. But he watches the video. And it helps. And… well, its one of the older videos. And Jason finds another old video. The one about… the one about his death. It shouldn't make his anger lessen, shouldn't make him cry, shouldn't bring him to Bruce’s doorstep where he reveals himself and they hug and cry and catch up and cry some more… but it does. 

Gothamites are a little surprised when their local Crime Lord appears on the channel, standing right next to Batman. Surprised, but pleased. Because Batman looks happy in a way he hasn't in a long time and well… Red Hood watched out for them too. And now their two protectors are working together.

[gallusrostromegalus]

Basically. I got screwed.

I am very sorry for how relatively quiet this blog has been but I've been dealing with a very unpleasant situation the last few months, and now I need help.

Essentially, I tried to help someone out, and she took advantage of me, and I have no way to recoup my losses.

Earlier this year, I moved into a new house. Before we sold the old house, a Now-Former friend ran into some trouble and was about to become homeless with pets and a small child. Not wanting them to be on the street, we offered to hold off selling the old house so she could stay there for a little while, if she could pay the cost of the mortgage on that house (because I could afford one mortgage but not two) while we helped her find somewhere more permanent.

I was not making money from this- since I was still paying the utilities and property taxes, I was actually losing money, but willing to soak that in order to help her save up and get her on her feet.

Instead, she:

Never Paid a Dime towards covering the mortgage costs like she agreed ($12,000 for the nine months she was there)

Trashed the house ($500 dump fees for the trash alone)

Let her pets piss and shit all over the house ($1,500 bio hazard cleanup, $4000 to replace the carpet and other damaged flooring)

Caused an electrical issue in the garage ($900 to repair)

Broke the washer, dryer and refrigerator ($2500 to replace)

Broke the fence ($1000 to repair)

When I told her I could no longer financially support her and that I needed to sell the old house, she illegally squatted there for a solid three months and I had to hire a lawyer and actually take her to court to get her to leave ($2,500)

The resulting stress has been, as you can imagine, stressful.

So stressful, in fact, that it aggravated a the medical conditions my husband had and made him extremely sick. He had to go to the hospital and take time off work to recover. Now the health insurance is trying to weasel out of paying his short-term disability claim.

So net, this woman has managed to cost me around $25,000 and that's not taking into account the missed paychecks and medical expenses. I do not have $25,000, and until at least $13,000 of that is spent to repair the damage she did, I legally cannot sell the house to even begin to recoup my losses.

Theoretically, I could sue this woman, but she doesn't have any money and it would be me paying even more money I don't have to get... Nothing. So I'm asking for help to cover the costs of getting the old house ready to sell, my husband's medical expenses, and other expenses incurred by this debacle:

If you can help out in any way-share, donate spare change, anything- I'd be extremely grateful.

Thank you.

[irstaxexpert]

In succession planning, one needs to consider multiple aspects of business and also family relationships. Learn how one can navigate the issues of taxes that can arise from succession planning.

[docureadyinc]

🎄✨ Merry Christmas & Happy New Year 2025 from Docuready Inc! ✨🎄

This holiday season, we at Docuready Inc want to thank you for trusting us with your legal document preparation and support needs. 🛡️💼 Whether it’s connecting you with the best divorce attorneys or streamlining your legal documentation process, we are here to serve you with care and professionalism. 📄✨ May your holidays be filled with joy, love, and success, and may 2025 bring new opportunities and happiness to all. 🌟 Let’s make this New Year remarkable together! 🥂❄️

[suiana]

SHUTUP I GOT AN IDEA BECAUSE OF THIS TUMBLR POST I SAW

imagine being the spouse of a high ranking court judge. the problem is that you're a big ass criminal (like, tax evasion and stuff idk) and you finally get caught by the police.

thankfully, your yandere! judge has decided to save you.

"you are convicted for several accounts of tax fraud and love scamming. do you plead guilty?"

"yeah, i did it. I'm not trying to lie or defend myself. anyway, is it really my fault if those guys were so gullible-"

"silence in the court."

you can only stare awkwardly as the judge enters the cout room and silences everyone. why was his voice so- oh. it's your husband..? IT'S YOUR HUSBAND?!

you weren't really sure what happened throughout the rest of the court session. you heard something about how you weren't in the wrong and how your husband would often go on tangents about why your crimes weren't considered crimes because it was you who did it.

before you knew it, you found your lawyer cheering in joy as the judge announced the results of the case.

"partially guilty. punishment is to be on house arrest for a month and to give their husband attention. case dismissed."

"s-sir! there is clear evidence of them committing-"

"you heard me the first time and i won't repeat myself. case dismissed."

you were in a daze the rest of the way home. was it... really that easy? i mean, you knew your husband would bend the world and back for you but to blatantly excuse your crimes like that... in front of tons of people too! isn't that-

"honey, you-"

"why would i put you in prison? that would be a punishment for me as well. also, have you forgotten who i am and my status? i'd break any law ethics for you, and no one would be able to say anything."

wow.... you never knew he was so... romantic.

i mean, you knew he was obsessed and loved you when he stalked and practically forced you to marry him but this had to be the ultimate act of love!

"also, i killed the guys you love scammed."

wait what?

[gtsconsultant67]

Digital Compliance Simplified: A Comprehensive Guide to GST Registration

Introduction:

GST Registration in the contemporary digital landscape, businesses are increasingly transitioning to online platforms to expand their reach and enhance operational efficiency. This transition necessitates strict adherence to government regulations, particularly in the realm of taxation. A fundamental aspect of taxation in India is the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Whether you are an emerging entrepreneur or an established business leader, grasping the nuances of GST registration is vital for maintaining compliance and achieving business success. This guide aims to clarify the process and provide you with the essential knowledge to navigate GST registration effectively.

What is GST?

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a consolidated indirect tax framework that was introduced in India on July 1, 2017. It replaced a multitude of indirect taxes, including VAT, service tax, and excise duty, thereby establishing a more efficient tax structure. GST is levied at every point in the supply chain, from production to consumption, allowing for the transfer of input tax credits at each level. This mechanism facilitates a smooth flow of tax credits and mitigates the issue of tax cascading.

Who Requires GST Registration?

GST registration is compulsory for businesses that fulfill certain criteria. The primary thresholds and conditions are as follows:

1.Turnover Threshold:

Businesses with an annual aggregate turnover surpassing ₹20 lakh (for the majority of states) or ₹10 lakh (for special category states).

For service providers, the threshold is set at ₹20 lakh in most states.

2.E-Commerce Operators: Any organization engaged in the supply of goods or services via an e-commerce platform.

3.Inter-State Suppliers: Businesses involved in the inter-state supply of goods or services, irrespective of their turnover.

4.Specific Categories: Certain entities, including input service distributors, casual taxable persons, and non-resident taxable persons, must obtain registration regardless of their turnover.

Advantages of GST Registration

Obtaining GST registration provides numerous benefits, including:

Legitimacy: GST registration bolsters the credibility of your business.

Input Tax Credit: Businesses are eligible to claim input tax credit on their purchases, thereby lowering their tax obligations.

Simplified Compliance: A unified tax system minimizes paperwork and compliance challenges.

Access to Broader Markets: With GST, businesses can participate in inter-state trade without restrictions.

Procedure for GST Registration

The GST registration process is fully online, ensuring efficiency and accessibility. To complete your registration, follow these steps:

Step 1: Compile Necessary Documents

Before initiating the registration process, ensure you have the following documents ready:

PAN card for both the business and the owner.

Proof of business registration or incorporation certificate.

Identity and address verification for promoters or directors.

Bank account statement or a canceled cheque.

Proof of address for the business premises. Step 2: Access the GST Portal

Navigate to the official GST portal and select “Services” followed by “Registration” and then “New Registration.”

Step 3: Complete Part-A of the Form

Enter the necessary information, including:

The legal name of the business as registered with PAN.

An email address and mobile number for OTP verification.

The state and district in which the business operates.

Upon submission of Part-A, a Temporary Reference Number (TRN) will be generated.

Step 4: Finalize Part-B of the Form

Utilizing the TRN, log into the portal to complete Part-B of the registration form. Provide further details such as:

The type of business (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation).

Information regarding the goods and services offered.

Bank account details.

Information about the authorized signatory.

Step 5: Document Upload

Upload the scanned versions of the required documents in the designated format and size.

Step 6: Application Submission

After filling out the form and uploading the necessary documents, submit the application using either an Electronic Verification Code (EVC) or a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC).

Step 7: Issuance of GSTIN

Once the application has been processed and verified by the relevant authorities, you will receive a GST Identification Number (GSTIN) along with a Certificate of Registration. This GSTIN serves as your unique identifier for all GST-related transactions.

Common Challenges and Solutions

Although the GST registration process is generally straightforward, certain challenges may occur:

Document Errors: Ensure that all documents are accurate and current to prevent delays.

Technical Issues: The GST portal may occasionally experience outages; maintaining patience and persistence is essential.

Incorrect Information: Verify all details prior to submission to avoid rejections.

If you face any difficulties, it may be beneficial to consult a tax professional or utilize digital compliance services for expert assistance.

Conclusion

Obtaining GTS Consultant India is more than merely fulfilling a regulatory obligation; it is an essential measure for enhancing your business's credibility and facilitating smooth operations in accordance with tax regulations. By adhering to the procedures detailed in this guide and utilizing digital resources, you can ease the registration process and concentrate on expanding your business.

In today's digital-centric environment, maintaining compliance need not be a daunting task. Arm yourself with the necessary information, adopt a proactive approach, and capitalize on the efficient processes provided by the GST framework. Your path to digital compliance begins with a single action—ensure it is a meaningful one.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Harpercollins wants authors to sign away AI training rights

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/18/rights-without-power/#careful-what-you-wish-for

Rights don't give you power. People with power can claim rights. Giving a "right" to someone powerless just transfers it to someone more powerful than them. Nowhere is this more visible than in copyright fights, where creative workers are given new rights that are immediately hoovered up by their bosses.

It's not clear whether copyright gives anyone the right to control whether their work is used to train an AI model. It's very common for people (including high ranking officials in entertainment companies, and practicing lawyers who don't practice IP law) to overestimate their understanding of copyright in general, and their knowledge of fair use in particular.

Here's a hint: any time someone says "X can never be fair use," they are wrong and don't know what they're talking about (same goes for "X is always fair use"). Likewise, anyone who says, "Fair use is assessed solely by considering the 'four factors.'" That is your iron-clad sign that the speaker does not understand fair use:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/27/nuke-first/#ask-questions-never

But let's say for the sake of argument that training a model on someone's work is a copyright violation, and so training is a licensable activity, and AI companies must get permission from rightsholders before they use their copyrighted works to train a model.

Even if that's not how copyright works today, it's how things could work. No one came down off a mountain with two stone tablets bearing the text of 17 USC chiseled in very, very tiny writing. We totally overhauled copyright in 1976, and again in 1998. There've been several smaller alterations since.

We could easily write a new law that requires licensing for AI training, and it's not hard to imagine that happening, given the current confluence of interests among creative workers (who are worried about AI pitchmen's proclaimed intention to destroy their livelihoods) and entertainment companies (who are suing many AI companies).

Creative workers are an essential element of that coalition. Without those workers as moral standard-bearers, it's hard to imagine the cause getting much traction. No one seriously believes that entertainment execs like Warner CEO David Zaslav actually cares about creative works – this is a guy who happily deletes every copy of an unreleased major film that had superb early notices because it would be worth infinitesimally more as a tax-break than as a work of art:

https://collider.com/coyote-vs-acme-david-zaslav-never-seen/

The activists in this coalition commonly call it "anti AI." But is it? Does David Zaslav – or any of the entertainment execs who are suing AI companies – want to prevent gen AI models from being used in the production of their products? No way – these guys love AI. Zaslav and his fellow movie execs held out against screenwriters demanding control over AI in the writers' room for 148 days, and locked out their actors for another 118 days over the use of AI to replace actors. Studio execs forfeited at least $5 billion in a bid to insist on their right to use AI against workers:

https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2023/12/06/a-deep-dive-into-the-economic-ripples-of-the-hollywood-strike/

Entertainment businesses love the idea of replacing their workers with AI. Now, that doesn't mean that AI can replace workers: just because your boss can be sold an AI to do your job, it doesn't mean that the AI he buys can actually do your job:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/25/accountability-sinks/#work-harder-not-smarter

So if we get the right to refuse to allow our work to be used to train a model, the "anti AI" coalition will fracture. Workers will (broadly) want to exercise that right to prevent AI models from being trained at all, while our bosses will want to exercise that right to be sure that they're paid for AI training, and that they can steer production of the resulting model to maximize the number of workers than can fire after it's done.

Hypothetically, creative workers could simply say to our bosses, "We will not sell you this right to authorize or refuse AI training that Congress just gave us." But our bosses will then say, "Fine, you're fired. We won't hire you for this movie, or record your album, or publish your book."

Given that there are only five major publishers, four major studios, three major labels, two ad-tech companies and one company that controls the whole ebook and audiobook market, a refusal to deal on the part of a small handful of firms effectively dooms you to obscurity.

As Rebecca Giblin and I write in our 2022 book Chokepoint Capitalism, giving more rights to a creative worker who has no bargaining power is like giving your bullied schoolkid more lunch money. No matter how much lunch money you give that kid, the bullies will take it and your kid will remain hungry. To get your kid lunch, you have to clear the bullies away from the gate. You need to make a structural change:

https://chokepointcapitalism.com/

Or, put another way: people with power can claim rights. But giving powerless people more rights doesn't make them powerful – it just transfers those rights to the people they bargain against.

Or, put a third way: "just because you're on their side, it doesn't follow that they're on your side" (h/t Teresa Nielsen Hayden):

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/19/gander-sauce/#just-because-youre-on-their-side-it-doesnt-mean-theyre-on-your-side

Last month, Penguin Random House, the largest publisher in the history of human civilization, started including a copyright notice in its books advising all comers that they would not permit AI training with the material between the covers:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/19/gander-sauce/#just-because-youre-on-their-side-it-doesnt-mean-theyre-on-your-side

At the time, people who don't like AI were very excited about this, even though it was – at the utmost – a purely theatrical gesture. After all, if AI training isn't fair use, then you don't need a notice to turn it into a copyright infringement. If AI training is fair use, it remains fair use even if you add some text to the copyright notice.

But far more important was the fact that the less that Penguin Random House pays its authors, the more it can pay its shareholders and executives. PRH didn't say it wouldn't sell the right to train a model to an AI company – they only said that an AI company that wanted to train a model on its books would have to pay PRH first. In other words, just because you're on their side, it doesn't follow that they're on your side.

When I wrote about PRH and its AI warning, I mentioned that I had personally seen one of the big five publishers hold up a book because a creator demanded a clause in their contract saying their work wouldn't be used to train an AI.

There's a good reason you'd want this in your contract; the standard contracting language contains bizarrely overreaching language seeking "rights in all media now know and yet to be devised throughout the universe":

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/19/reasonable-agreement/

But the publisher flat-out refused, and the creator fought and fought, and in the end, it became clear that this was a take-it-or-leave-it situation: the publisher would not include a "no AI training" clause in the contract.

One of the big five publishers is Rupert Murdoch's Harpercollins. Murdoch is famously of the opinion that any kind of indexing or archiving of the work he publishes must require a license. He even demanded to be paid to have his newspapers indexed by search engines:

https://www.inquisitr.com/46786/epic-win-news-corp-likely-to-remove-content-from-google

No surprise, then, that Murdoch sued an AI company over training on Newscorp content:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/25/unjust-threat-murdoch-and-artists-align-in-fight-over-ai-content-scraping

But Rupert Murdoch doesn't oppose the material he publishes from being used in AI training, nor is he opposed to the creation and use of models. Murdoch's Harpercollins is now pressuring its authors to sign away their rights to have their works used to train an AI model:

https://bsky.app/profile/kibblesmith.com/post/3laz4ryav3k2w

The deal is not negotiable, and the email demanding that authors opt into it warns that AI might make writers obsolete (remember, even if AI can't do your job, an AI salesman can convince Rupert Murdoch – who is insatiably horny for not paying writers – that an AI is capable of doing your job):

https://www.avclub.com/harpercollins-selling-books-to-ai-language-training

And it's not hard to see why an AI company might want this; after all, if they can lock in an exclusive deal to train a model on Harpercollins' back catalog, their products will exclusively enjoy whatever advantage is to be had in that corpus.

In just a month, we've gone from "publishers won't promise not to train a model on your work" to "publishers are letting an AI company train a model on your work, but will pay you a nonnegotiable pittance for your work." The next step is likely to be, "publishers require you to sign away the right to train a model on your work."

The right to decide who can train a model on your work does you no good unless it comes with the power to exercise that right.

Rather than campaigning for the right to decide who can train a model on our work, we should be campaigning for the power to decide what terms we contract under. The Writers Guild spent 148 days on the picket line, a remarkable show of solidarity.

But the Guild's real achievement was in securing the right to unionize at all – to create a sectoral bargaining unit that could represent all the writers, writing for all the studios. The achievements of our labor forebears, in the teeth of ruthless armed resistance, resulted in the legalization and formalization of unions. Never forget that the unions that exist today were criminal enterprises once upon a time, and the only reason they exist is because people risked prison, violence and murder to organize when doing so was a crime:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/11/rip-jane-mcalevey/#organize

The fights were worth fighting. The screenwriters comprehensively won the right to control AI in the writers' room, because they had power:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/

Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

--

Eva Rinaldi (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rupert_Murdoch_-_Flickr_-_Eva_Rinaldi_Celebrity_and_Live_Music_Photographer.jpg

CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en