#tangledmovielove
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
marie95disneygirl ¡ 1 month ago
Text
Rant on Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure – How the Series Ruined Flynn Rider
I will forever hate this stupid series for what it did to Flynn. Not only did they completely destroy his character, turning him into an arrogant, stupid, and utterly unlikeable person, but they also turned him into the constant punching bag of the show. Flynn, who was clever, witty, and charming in Tangled, has been reduced to a shadow of his former self. His arrogance in the movie was part of an act—a defense mechanism, something that made him endearing, not insufferable. But in the series? He’s just… off.
What frustrates me the most is how Flynn is constantly belittled, bullied, and treated like garbage by Cassandra and other characters, while Rapunzel stands by and does nothing. And when he dares to speak up, she’s the one who gets angry! She never defends him, even though he’s the one who’s being mistreated. Instead, she just takes him for granted, never even apologizing for the horrible things done to him.
She keeps secrets from him, draws his face on a punching bag just to please Cassandra, and never seems to feel guilty about it. She even uses time travel to literally change his personality when he dares to disagree with her, and she’s fine with that! And the worst part? She keeps rejecting his marriage proposals and repeatedly denies him the chance to be with her in any official, committed way. Marriage is apparently a prison to her, despite the fact that in the original movie, she was willing to give up everything to be with him!
Seriously, how does that make sense? How does it make sense that she was ready to give up her entire freedom for him in the movie, and now, after everything they’ve been through, she acts like marriage is the worst thing ever? It completely undermines the emotional weight of their love story in Tangled. In the movie, they were willing to risk everything for each other—so why would she suddenly think marriage is such a prison? It just makes no logical sense, and it sends a horrible message to kids about relationships and commitment.
And here’s what really gets me: if they loved each other so much in Tangled that they were willing to risk their lives for one another after just a few days, then they should have married right away. The time period they’re in—let’s face it—makes it entirely reasonable that they’d marry quickly. Back then, marriage was often the only way to be together, and they were clearly in love. Flynn proposes months after they meet—not a few days! And that’s a perfectly reasonable amount of time to get engaged, especially given the era.
But instead of honoring this established love story, they go down this ridiculous path in the series where Rapunzel questions her commitment to Flynn. She never truly values him in the same way he values her. She doesn’t see marriage as a commitment to the person she loves; she sees it as something that takes away her freedom. And that’s the worst message they could be sending, especially to young viewers.
Marriage isn’t a “prison” in real life—it’s a symbol of commitment and partnership. So why is the show framing it like it’s a burden? And why does Flynn have to be the one who constantly compromises and gives in to Rapunzel’s whims, while she never seems to care about his feelings?
It’s honestly unfair to Flynn. He deserves better than to be treated like a secondary character in his own love story. He deserves to have his feelings valued. He deserves a partner who is equally committed to him, who doesn’t repeatedly reject his offers of marriage. I mean, what man would put up with that in real life? If a man continuously rejected a woman’s proposal, and then acted like he didn’t even care about her needs, it would be called toxic and emotionally abusive. But for some reason, when the roles are reversed, it’s considered acceptable.
And yes, I understand that Rapunzel has her own trauma—but so does Flynn! He grew up unloved, alone in an orphanage and on the streets, and yet he still manages to treat Rapunzel with kindness, respect, and love. He didn’t let his past turn him into a cruel or selfish person. So why does she get a free pass while he’s treated like garbage? He didn’t deserve any of this, and it honestly makes me angry to think about.
There’s also the issue of Flynn’s entire character being destroyed. The man we saw in Tangled was a charming, witty, somewhat selfish rogue who grew into a devoted partner. But in the series, he’s just… dumbed down. His charisma is gone. He’s not even recognizable as the same person. He’s turned into a joke, and honestly, I refuse to believe that the Flynn in the series is the same character from the movie. I just can’t buy it.
What they did to Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is heartbreaking. They ruined Flynn. They ruined the love story. And the worst part is they did it all for some misguided notion of “modern feminism” or to make a show more “progressive.” But they didn’t have to ruin what was already a beautiful love story. They didn’t have to destroy Flynn’s character to make some ridiculous point about independence or freedom.
And the final kicker? If I had to count the series as canon, I’d rather Flynn stayed dead at the end of the movie than suffer through this toxic, messed-up relationship dynamic. At least in the original movie, their love story felt pure and real, but the series just turned everything sour. It feels like a different universe.
So, I refuse to count it as canon. I will always prefer Tangled as the true continuation of their story, and the series? Well, it’s a mess I can’t even bother with. It just doesn’t fit.
Flynn deserves better, and Rapunzel deserves to recognize that before it’s too late
2 notes ¡ View notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 17 days ago
Photo
She looks way too happy and rushes too much into physical love to make me believe she would have rejected his marriage proposal even once in a time where marriage was the only way for two people to even be together publicly and physically
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
TANGLED / TANGLED EVER AFTER: Repunzel + Eugene + kisses  💕
4K notes ¡ View notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 17 days ago
Text
Why Rapunzel and Flynn’s Relationship in Tangled: The Series Is a Complete Disaster
I will never understand why Disney chose to completely ruin Rapunzel and Flynn's beautiful, loving relationship from the movie in Tangled: The Series. What was once a tale of mutual respect, selfless love, and personal growth turns into a toxic mess, where Rapunzel treats Flynn like an afterthought and their entire relationship is reduced to something unrecognizable. Here’s why I’m so angry at what they did to these characters and their story.
Flynn’s Character Destruction Let’s start with Flynn. In the original movie, he was a charming, witty, and complex character with his flaws, sure, but a character who grew and changed for the better because of Rapunzel. He wasn’t perfect, but he had heart. In Tangled: The Series, though, Flynn becomes a complete joke. Gone is the smart, street-smart man who learned to love and put others first. Instead, we get a guy who’s perpetually clumsy, naive, and often treated like the butt of the joke. He’s constantly belittled by others, including Cassandra, and Rapunzel never stands up for him. What happened to the man who stood up against a whole army to protect her? It’s just heartbreaking to watch him turned into a shell of the character we loved.
Rapunzel’s Total Disrespect for Flynn The way Rapunzel treats Flynn in Tangled: The Series is honestly unforgivable. She constantly takes him for granted, disregards his feelings, and lets him be mocked by everyone around them—Cassandra especially. And the worst part? She never steps in to defend him. How is it that the Rapunzel from the movie, who loved Flynn enough to sacrifice herself to save him, has become someone who allows her partner to be insulted and humiliated?
Let’s talk about the proposal. Flynn proposes to Rapunzel in the movie, and in that moment, it was clear they had a deep, unbreakable bond, and their love was something real and pure. But in the series, Rapunzel rejects his proposal multiple times! She does not see the value of marriage with Flynn, even though they’ve been through so much together. Instead, she acts like he’s asking for a prison sentence. What happened to the Rapunzel who was willing to sacrifice everything to be with him? How does she go from being so deeply in love that she would go to prison for him to now acting like their commitment is too much of a burden?
The Time Travel “Fix” and the Lack of Accountability One of the most disturbing plot points in the series is when Rapunzel uses time travel to “fix” Flynn’s personality after he dares to disagree with her. This is so incredibly toxic. No relationship should have one partner constantly trying to mold the other to fit their ideals, especially by manipulating time itself. Rapunzel never once acknowledges how wrong and manipulative this is. If the roles were reversed and Flynn did something like this to Rapunzel, the outrage would be immediate. Yet Rapunzel gets away with it, and it’s treated like no big deal. How can she still be seen as a heroine when she treats Flynn’s agency and personality like something to be “fixed” when he doesn’t meet her expectations?
The Terrible Message About Marriage The worst part about this series is the message it sends about love and marriage. In Tangled: The Series, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal multiple times, and it’s framed like he’s the one being unreasonable. Marriage is depicted as a “prison,” despite the fact that the Rapunzel from the movie would’ve done anything to be with Flynn forever, even if it meant a life of confinement. This contradiction doesn’t just harm their relationship; it sends an awful message to audiences about commitment and love.
Why is marriage being demonized here? The movie presented marriage as a symbol of eternal love and commitment, and it made sense within the context of the time. Back then, marriage was the only way for Rapunzel and Flynn to be together as equals. Yet the series twists that, turning marriage into something negative, even though both characters showed immense devotion to each other.
Rapunzel’s constant rejection of Flynn’s proposal feels like a slap in the face to the deep love they shared in the movie. They were willing to sacrifice everything for each other! How does that suddenly change to "marriage equals imprisonment" in the series? It’s insulting, especially considering how much they’ve been through to finally be together.
The Double Standard in Relationships The double standard here is staggering. Flynn is constantly expected to change, apologize, and adjust to Rapunzel’s every whim, yet Rapunzel never makes any compromises herself. She’s allowed to ignore his needs and brush off his feelings, but if Flynn does the slightest thing she doesn’t like, it’s a huge deal. This is not how a healthy relationship works, and Disney should not be portraying this dynamic as normal or acceptable. The movie showed us two people who were equals, who loved and respected each other. The series turned that into a one-sided relationship where Flynn has to bend over backward while Rapunzel gets everything she wants.
Conclusion Tangled: The Series completely ruins what made the relationship between Rapunzel and Flynn so beautiful in the movie. Their love was built on mutual respect, sacrifice, and the willingness to always have each other’s backs. In the series, however, it becomes a toxic and one-sided mess where Flynn is constantly belittled, his feelings ignored, and Rapunzel manipulates him to fit her vision of the relationship. It’s heartbreaking to watch the characters devolve into shadows of their former selves.
Disney took something pure and turned it into something unrecognizable. I’ll always love Tangled for what it was—the story of two people who found each other, made sacrifices, and built a life together. But Tangled: The Series made me realize that sometimes, a beautiful story is better left untold, rather than destroyed for the sake of a "modern" narrative.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 17 days ago
Text
Why I Can't Consider Tangled: The Series Canon – Disney Completely Changed Rapunzel and Flynn’s Love Story
I loved Disney’s Tangled for its beautiful portrayal of love and sacrifice between Rapunzel and Flynn. But Tangled: The Series took everything that made their relationship special and transformed it into a confusing, unrecognizable, and even toxic dynamic.
In the Tangled movie, Rapunzel and Flynn shared an immediate, selfless connection. They each sacrificed for one another, showing a true, deep love after just a few days—a connection that felt timeless and true. Flynn risked his life to protect her, and she was willing to give up her freedom, even if it meant living in a tower or going to prison with him for all eternity. This kind of commitment made them one of Disney’s most powerful couples.
But the series undoes so much of this. Flynn, who was clever, brave, and selfless, becomes almost a sidekick—often belittled and insulted by other characters, particularly Cassandra, while Rapunzel just stands by and says nothing. When he speaks his mind, she prioritizes Cassandra’s feelings, often disregarding Flynn’s own opinions, dreams, and even his proposal. It feels as if his desires don’t matter.
One of the most disappointing aspects is Rapunzel’s rejection of his proposal, suggesting that marriage is a trap, when in the movie, she was ready to sacrifice everything for Flynn. Her hesitation about marriage after months together, especially in a historical context where marriage was essential to truly be together, feels forced and out of character. Marriage in that time period was a commitment that allowed two people to share their lives without barriers. Rejecting it makes no sense for a princess in love and sends a confusing message.
The Way Tangled: The Series Undermines the Meaning of Love and Marriage In Tangled, Rapunzel and Flynn showed they would do anything for each other after only days together. But in the series, Rapunzel hesitates about marriage even after months, treating it as a loss of “freedom” rather than a commitment. This completely shifts the message, making it seem like Flynn’s love—and marriage itself—is something to fear or resist. That hesitation can feel hurtful and unfair, as if Rapunzel only values Flynn when others are interested in him, which feels toxic and completely different from the pure, selfless love portrayed in the movie.
And if Disney wanted a couple to take things slowly, why use Rapunzel and Flynn, who are deeply in love and have risked everything for each other? Tangled showed a pure, meaningful connection—a couple who would want to be together forever. Seeing Rapunzel doubt this makes her character feel inconsistent with everything the movie established.
Historical Inaccuracy and the Harmful Message about Love and Respect In the time period Tangled is set, marrying early was normal, especially for royalty. Tangled: The Series pushes the modern idea that marriage limits freedom, even though in the historical context of Tangled, marriage was a way for two people to officially build a life together. It’s not realistic to think a princess from this time would reject a proposal after months with the person she loves.
And this modern perspective of “marriage as a prison” makes it seem as if Rapunzel only wants the benefits of Flynn’s love without giving him the commitment he’s ready to make. What kind of message does that send to kids? If someone views marriage as a trap, it implies they’re not fully in love or looking for a way out, which isn’t fair to Flynn’s character or to the original fairy tale.
Rapunzel was supposed to be a symbol of love, freedom, and loyalty, but this series paints her as someone indecisive and self-centered, leaving Flynn to constantly compromise without her doing the same.
Conclusion In Tangled, Rapunzel and Flynn’s love is timeless and committed. Tangled: The Series undermines their bond, turning Flynn into a character who constantly has to prove himself, and makes Rapunzel seem selfish and dismissive. The entire series feels incompatible with the movie’s message of love and commitment. I wish Disney hadn’t changed their story so drastically just to add “modern” drama. For me, I’ll always see the movie as canon and this series as something else entirely.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 17 days ago
Text
Why the Tangled Series Betrayed the Original Story of Rapunzel and Flynn
As someone who loved Tangled for its story of selfless love, personal growth, and deep commitment, I was incredibly disappointed with the Tangled series and the way it handled Rapunzel and Flynn’s relationship. Here’s why the show felt like such a betrayal of the original story and why I just can’t accept it as canon:
1. Ruined Character Dynamics
In the Tangled movie, Flynn was a clever, resourceful, and compassionate man who put on a bit of an arrogant front. His cockiness was just a shield, but he clearly had a smart, caring side beneath it. But in the series, Flynn is reduced to a shadow of his former self—made into a joke, belittled by other characters, especially Cassandra, and constantly disrespected by Rapunzel. This is not the Flynn who sacrificed his life for Rapunzel; it feels like a different character entirely.
Rapunzel, who we saw as kind, strong, and self-assured in the movie, ends up treating Flynn poorly in the show. She keeps secrets from him, dismisses his opinions, and even draws his face on a punching bag as a joke. Why would she demean someone she supposedly loves? It makes her character seem insensitive, which isn’t the Rapunzel we fell in love with.
2. The Marriage Rejection
In the series, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal not once but several times, even after they’ve been together for months! It’s inconsistent with her character from the movie, where she was ready to give up everything for him within days. Suddenly, marriage is framed as some kind of “prison” for her. Why? This isn’t just confusing; it’s toxic.
Rejecting marriage sends a troubling message: that commitment isn’t a natural part of a loving relationship, or that one person’s desires are less important than the other’s autonomy. In reality, healthy relationships are based on mutual respect, balance, and a desire to be together. This series risks teaching the opposite.
3. Historical Inconsistency
The story is set in a time period when marriage was not only expected but essential for couples who loved each other. For a couple as passionately in love as Rapunzel and Flynn, delaying marriage doesn’t fit the setting. If they were both willing to sacrifice their lives for each other after a few days, then marrying a few months later shouldn’t be a “trap”—it should be the natural next step.
The series misses the chance to portray marriage as a positive outcome and instead makes it seem like a burden. This is especially disappointing because the original Tangled was about two people who finally found a way out of loneliness and isolation through love. Why would they turn that beautiful ending into a toxic game of avoidance and conflict?
4. Sending a Toxic Message About Relationships
There’s a double standard here: if Flynn treated Rapunzel this way—constantly belittling her, rejecting her wishes, or keeping her waiting for a future that he wasn’t committed to—most people would see it as toxic. But the series implies that it’s fine because it’s Rapunzel rejecting Flynn. This imbalance sends a confusing message to fans.
And what kind of message is it to teach young viewers that one person’s opinions, needs, and feelings don’t matter as much as the other’s? Flynn shouldn’t always have to compromise his happiness to please Rapunzel. True love means caring about both people’s dreams and desires, not just one.
5. Ignoring the Original Fairy Tale
The Tangled story is based on one of the world’s most famous fairy tales about a girl’s love that breaks her free from isolation. In every original version, the relationship is based on mutual love and willingness to sacrifice. The show’s writers lost this heart, turning Rapunzel into a “girlboss” character who prioritizes herself over her partner. It’s fine to be independent, but this shouldn’t come at the cost of a healthy relationship.
In the earliest version of Rapunzel (Petrosinella), the heroine’s love for her prince inspired her to escape her imprisonment and to start a new life with him. There was nothing wrong with that; it made sense for the story’s time period and captured a very human desire for love and partnership. Ignoring this context is disrespectful to the original tale.
6. The Series Just Doesn’t Fit With the Movie
In the movie, Rapunzel and Flynn were both willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for each other’s happiness. But in the series, Rapunzel won’t even commit to him. If this is the version of Rapunzel we’re supposed to believe in, then it almost makes the original movie seem unbelievable. To stay true to the love story, I have to consider the series non-canon.
Disney managed to get the tone right with the Aladdin remake, allowing Jasmine and Aladdin to marry at the end. Why couldn’t they give Rapunzel and Flynn this same respect in the series?
Disney took what could have been a beautiful love story of mutual respect and partnership and warped it into a forced narrative about independence that doesn’t even make sense for the setting. Rapunzel and Flynn were meant to be together; they deserved to have their story end on a high note, not in a drawn-out cycle of disrespect and frustration.
In Summary: Disney, Please Don’t Let This Be Canon
If Disney ever remakes Tangled, I hope they remember what made Rapunzel and Flynn so beloved. Give them an ending where they marry and begin their lives together as equals, honoring the time period of the original fairy tale.
The series may have had good intentions, but it missed what made Tangled beautiful: a story of love and commitment that transcends isolation and fear. Until Disney recognizes this, I’ll always consider the series non-canon.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 18 days ago
Text
Tangled: The Series – Or How to Turn the Most Loyal Disney Couple into an Absolute Mess
Rating: -100/10 ⭐️ (Would give it less if possible!)
Dear Disney, why did you feel the need to ruin the story of Rapunzel and Flynn? Tangled was perfect—a fairytale with romance, sacrifice, and two people who were willing to give up everything for each other after only a few days. And then came Tangled: The Series, which took this beautiful relationship, threw it in a blender, and added a heaping dose of modern relationship drama that nobody asked for. Flynn Rider, the charming, witty, smart hero, has become… well, let’s just say the “Flynn” in this series is hardly recognizable.
First off, Flynn’s character is now unrecognizably arrogant and foolish, constantly sidelined, and endlessly belittled by others, particularly Cassandra, while Rapunzel just stands by and says nothing! Remember the guy who sacrificed everything for Rapunzel? Well, now he’s basically the series’ comic relief who can’t catch a break. And Rapunzel, who seemed like she’d do anything to keep him safe, suddenly just… lets it happen. Worse, she’s even angry at Flynn if he so much as looks at Cassandra the wrong way. Where is the love, Disney?
And don’t even get me started on the marriage storyline. In the series, Rapunzel rejects marriage like it’s some kind of trap. She was ready to spend eternity in a tower for Flynn at the end of Tangled, but now, marriage is too much commitment? The message seems to be: “Marriage is a prison—even if you truly love someone.” And it’s not like she rejected him because they’d only known each other for a week—no, this is months later. It’s baffling. You’d think they’d be racing to get married after all the movie’s high-stakes sacrifices. And back then, marriage was the only way they could actually be together! In this setting, if you’re in love, you get married—end of story. But Disney’s got Flynn waiting around endlessly, while Rapunzel seems more interested in her “freedom.”
Then there’s the insulting double standard. Rapunzel’s allowed to keep secrets, take him for granted, even draw his face on a punching bag (for Cassandra’s benefit!) without a hint of remorse. She even goes back in time to change his personality just because he dares to disagree with her. If Flynn tried even half of this nonsense, he’d be roasted alive. And if the writers wanted a storyline about a couple who wouldn’t marry right away, why not go with Tiana and Naveen? Their relationship was playful and open-ended; they weren’t sacrificing their lives for each other on day one. Rapunzel and Flynn, though, were the opposite—they knew instantly that they’d found “the one,” and in their time period, you don’t put off marriage after finding that kind of love. If they’d almost died for each other, why would they not want to marry?
And what message are we sending to young viewers here? That a man’s opinions don’t matter in a relationship? That marriage is some horrible trap if you love someone? That one person (in this case, Flynn) should constantly give up his feelings and wishes for the other? Poor Flynn deserves someone who loves him, respects his opinions, and doesn’t see his proposal as a prison sentence. And why would any self-respecting guy put up with this? The Flynn Rider from the movie, with his rough edges and ego, would never stick around for this treatment. It’s painful to watch him go from confident to sidelined so fast.
And the historical accuracy? Nonexistent. Back then, people who loved each other and wanted to be together got married. That was just the norm. Imagine Cinderella or Aurora saying, “Thanks, Prince Charming, but I need my ‘me’ time.” And I’ll never understand why Disney chose this couple to give a “modern” relationship twist. Flynn and Rapunzel are willing to die for each other in the movie, yet in the series, marriage is too much?
Disney, how did we go from a couple so in love that they’d risk their lives, to a series where one character is manipulated and disrespected for laughs? A guy who went from orphaned outcast to world-class charmer doesn’t become a love-struck fool who’s okay with constant rejection, insults, and unrealistic compromises in a matter of months. And if you wanted modern drama, why pick a story set in the 1700s?
If you’re looking for healthy Disney couples, why not remember Tarzan and Jane, or Robin Hood and Maid Marian? Flynn and Rapunzel from the movie belong in that same category. Tangled was supposed to be about true love conquering all. Instead, we got a series that treats commitment as a burden and turns one of Disney’s best male characters into a watered-down shadow of himself. This show sends the wrong message and messes up a story that didn’t need more “modern lessons.” Flynn deserved better, Rapunzel deserved better, and frankly, so did we.
For all these reasons, I’ll never consider Tangled: The Series canon and will happily pretend it never existed so I can enjoy the movie. In fact, if I had to take it as canon, I almost wish Flynn had just stayed dead in the movie—it would’ve been tragic, but at least it would’ve preserved the dignity of his character and their love story.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 18 days ago
Text
Flynn Rider Deserves Better—A Tragic Tale of a Hero Reduced to Comic Relief
Rating: 0/10 ⭐️ (And that’s being generous)
Dear Disney, thanks for taking one of my favorite animated love stories and flipping it upside down into a masterclass in how not to write romance. I came in expecting Tangled: The Series to expand on Rapunzel and Flynn’s beautiful connection, but instead… I got relationship chaos, character assassination, and a bizarre moral about how marriage is actually a trap. Apparently, love means constantly belittling your partner, keeping secrets, and time-traveling just to alter their opinions. And they call this the “healthiest Disney couple”? Here’s a breakdown of why Tangled: The Series is the ultimate lesson in how to ruin a romance:
1. Flynn Rider: Hero to… Comic Relief? Whoever wrote this version of Flynn must have skipped the movie, because the Flynn in Tangled is witty, clever, and knows how to put on a confident front. Yet here, he’s reduced to a dimwitted, self-centered clown. It’s like Disney decided that because he’s the guy, he doesn’t deserve depth. Gone is the sharp, lovable Flynn we knew. Instead, he’s a caricature, constantly getting insulted, pushed aside, and trampled on by Rapunzel’s best friend, Cassandra, while Rapunzel stands by, silent as a wallflower. And Rapunzel has the audacity to get mad if Flynn says anything remotely critical of Cassandra? It’s ridiculous!
2. The Marriage Plot: A Cruel Joke Remember in Tangled when Rapunzel was ready to sacrifice her freedom forever just to be with Flynn? Apparently, now marriage is where she draws the line. And somehow, sacrificing her life for a guy she’s just met is noble, but committing to a man she’s deeply in love with after months of being together is a prison? I mean, this is the 1700s we’re talking about! Back then, marriage wasn’t optional if you wanted to be together, so what is with this plotline where she keeps rejecting his proposals like it’s a game? Flynn has to ask her over and over, only to be rejected each time—how’s that for a “healthy relationship”?
3. Marriage is a Trap? Only If You’re Not With the Right Person This show sends the mind-boggling message that marrying someone you truly love equals “losing your freedom.” Yet in the movie, Rapunzel was ready to lose everything just to save Flynn. Now, she’s scared marriage will mean she’s tied down forever. Newsflash: if you love someone enough to risk your life for them, a wedding ring shouldn’t be the deal-breaker! Also, since when is love about constant sacrifice by one partner? This show makes Flynn give in every single time, like his opinions and dreams don’t matter. In real life, that’s a red flag.
4. The Toxic Double Standard Imagine the roles were reversed, and it was Flynn constantly ignoring Rapunzel’s wishes, brushing her off, and putting his friends above her. Would people call that healthy? Not a chance. But apparently, because Rapunzel’s the “free spirit,” it’s totally okay for her to put Flynn on the back burner and even draw his face on a punching bag. She constantly disregards his feelings, and Disney wants me to believe this is love? In what world does that make any sense?
5. If You Reject Someone’s Proposal… Maybe Don’t Stay Together In real life, rejecting a marriage proposal usually means “I don’t see a future with you.” But here, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal (repeatedly!) and they just go on dating like it’s nothing. If she’s so terrified of a life with him, maybe she shouldn’t be with him? Flynn deserves someone who loves him without second thoughts, not someone who constantly hesitates and treats him like a backup option.
6. Historical Accuracy Was Thrown Out the Window The movie’s story takes place in a time where marriage was the way for two people to be together. So why does the show treat it like a modern-day relationship drama? It’s like they threw 1700s history out the window for a modern rom-com plot. And if Disney wanted to showcase a couple taking it slow, they had the perfect candidates in Tiana and Naveen—set in the 1920s, they could easily go the “long-term relationship” route. But Rapunzel and Flynn? No way! After everything they went through, they would want to be together. They literally almost died for each other! Why would they wait years to get married?
7. The Lesson Here Is What…? Ultimately, Tangled: The Series teaches that a relationship can function even if one partner has to make all the sacrifices. And that’s not love; that’s just unfair. The series completely ignores Flynn’s background and trauma—he grew up alone, unloved, and still treats Rapunzel right. And yet, all Rapunzel does in return is push him aside, mock his desires, and time-travel to change his personality when he disagrees with her. I mean, I thought love was about respecting each other’s differences, but this show thinks it’s about altering them to fit one person’s vision. Yikes.
In Conclusion Disney’s Tangled: The Series took a beautiful love story and turned it into a modern drama where true love is redefined as “wait forever and put up with constant disrespect.” Flynn deserves better than to be treated like Rapunzel’s last choice, and Rapunzel deserves someone who isn’t always giving in. And let’s not even get started on how bizarre it is that marrying someone you love after a few months is bad but throwing your life away for a stranger is good. Logic? None here. If you want a story where characters actually respect each other, go watch the original Tangled and leave this series out of it.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 18 days ago
Text
Tangled: The Series—Or How to Turn a Fairy Tale Romance into a Modern Love Lesson (And Not in a Good Way)
Rating: 0/10 ⭐️ (I’d give it negative stars if I could)
Dear Disney, how could you? You had one job: continue the magic, romance, and timeless charm of Tangled. Instead, what did we get? A modern soap opera that tosses love, historical accuracy, and the true spirit of Tangled out the window. Congratulations, Disney, you have officially created the most frustrating series ever, where fairy-tale romance meets…modern relationship debates. Just what we all wanted, right? No? Well, here’s why it failed:
Let’s start with Rapunzel and Flynn (or should I say Eugene, though he hardly resembles the same character we knew and loved). Remember how they sacrificed everything for each other in the original movie? You’d think that level of devotion would lead to one thing and one thing only in an 18th-century setting: marriage! But apparently not! Instead, Disney thinks that a marriage proposal is just some “optional” step to freedom, and that a long-term relationship can just sit around waiting for Rapunzel to “find herself.” Seriously? This is the 1700s we’re talking about! People didn’t just “date” for years on end! They married early so they could be together. This isn’t a social media relationship status update; it’s real love… or at least it was, before this series.
And what’s with the whole “marriage is a prison” message? Last I checked, Rapunzel and Eugene were madly in love. And when you love someone that much, you want to be with them, not postpone marriage as if it’s some kind of life sentence! In the time period Tangled is supposed to represent, marriage was the only way couples could truly be together. So why does Disney insist on shoving modern ideas into a historical setting, making marriage sound like a trap? I’ll tell you why: it’s this toxic “modern feminist” mindset where they can’t stand the idea of a princess actually wanting to marry her true love. The horror!
And poor Eugene… or Flynn… or whatever’s left of him in this show. He went from a charming, selfless hero in the movie to some watered-down comic relief character who exists solely to be “the guy” who has to wait around. It’s painful to watch. Eugene, who was willing to sacrifice his life for Rapunzel, now has to sit in the background while she decides whether she feels like getting married? It’s like turning Romeo and Juliet into an episode of Friends.
And now the historical aspect: This show completely ignores the 1700s time period. Back then, marriage was essential, especially for women, for social and practical reasons! The original Rapunzel story (Petrosinella by Basile) had a girl who knew exactly what she wanted—a prince who would take her out of a bad situation and give her a better life. Petrosinella knew that marriage wasn’t a trap; it was her freedom, her fairy-tale ending! Just like Cinderella, she wanted a way out of her sad reality, and the prince provided that! In fact, her love story is one of the best and most romantic examples of how love could be the key to freedom. Yet, in Tangled: The Series, that message is totally twisted into “independence means not marrying the person you love.”
And then they try to make Rapunzel into this “fighting, modern girlboss” type—what’s up with that? She was already strong in the original fairy tale! She outsmarted her captor, planned her own escape, and knew exactly what she wanted from life. She didn’t need modern ideas of “independence” to know she wanted to leave her tower and be with her prince! And yes, she wanted a prince—is that so wrong? People want true love; that’s why these stories exist! But no, this series had to turn Rapunzel into the new face of “I don’t need no man”—even if she’s already found the perfect one.
Disney, what happened to fairy-tale love stories? Because this is more like a lesson in “modern dating nightmares.” This series should come with a warning: “Do not expect Tangled vibes; may contain harsh doses of modern relationship cynicism.”
In Summary: Disney turned the greatest love story of all time into a modern drama about “freedom” from commitment and ignored that marriage in a historical setting was the way for two people to be together. Flynn and Rapunzel are still the best couple Disney ever created, but if I have to count Tangled: The Series as canon, my heart might just shatter. Save yourself the heartbreak and watch the movie instead.
Final Verdict: -0/10 stars.
0 notes
marie95disneygirl ¡ 1 month ago
Text
Tangled is One of My Favorite Disney Movies – But I Hate the TV Series
Tangled has always been one of my favorite Disney movies, and I absolutely adore the love story of Rapunzel and Flynn. However, there’s something I absolutely cannot stand: the Tangled TV series. It ruined everything for me, and if I have to consider the series as canon, it would completely destroy my love for the original film.
It’s honestly painful how they trashed Flynn’s character and their entire relationship just to cater to some misguided notion of modern feminism and "progressive" ideals. They’ve turned Flynn into a bumbling fool, completely ruining the clever, charming, and smart character he was in the original movie. And worse yet, they’ve stripped Rapunzel of her independence and made her doubt the very love she so clearly shared with Flynn in the film.
What infuriates me the most is how the series portrayed the idea of rejecting a marriage proposal and then staying together as if that was somehow a healthy or sensible thing to do. In the time period this story is set, marriage wasn’t just about a wedding ceremony—it was about being together, about having a future, about building a life with someone. Back then, people married young because it was often the only way they could truly be together. Flynn’s proposal in the movie wasn’t rushed—it was a natural progression of their deep love for each other, especially given the era they lived in.
But in the series, the message is clear: marriage is a prison—even if you love someone deeply, even if you’ve been together for months or years. This is a terrible message, and it’s absurd. If you love someone, you want to marry them. You don’t reject them because you feel like it will strip you of your freedom. That’s a red flag that implies you don’t actually see a future with them. Marriage isn’t a trap—it’s a symbol of commitment and love. If someone considers marriage to be a prison, they’re subconsciously thinking about cheating or breaking up. And that’s not love!
The historical inaccuracy is also glaring. Back in the time period this story is set in, marriage was the way for two people to be together. There was no “waiting for a few years to decide” because society didn’t allow that. No one could just live together as a couple back then, especially if you were a princess. The idea that Rapunzel and Flynn should have waited years to get married is ridiculous. If anything, they should have been portrayed as a couple eager to get married as soon as possible because that’s what would have made sense for their time.
And don't get me started on how the series turned Rapunzel into a fighting, modern-day “Mary Sue” girlboss character. In the original fairy tale, Rapunzel was already empowered—she made decisions for herself, let the prince into her tower, and plotted her own escape. The only thing that’s different in the series is that they’ve amped up her physical strength to make her more “modern” and “feminist,” as if it wasn’t already clear from the original that she was no damsel in distress. This change in her character feels unnecessary and forced, and it completely undermines the beauty of the original tale, Petrosinella, where her love for the prince was a true source of freedom, not a burden.
To add to my frustration, I despise how they twisted the whole narrative to fit a “modern feminist” agenda. The original Rapunzel (or Petrosinella, as it’s known in Basile’s version) is a beautiful love story, and Disney’s series ruined that. Rapunzel was a girl in an oppressive situation who found freedom and love in the prince, which was an empowering message. She wasn't just waiting for a man, she was waiting for a future and a life outside the tower—and a marriage to a prince was the way to escape. That was reality for women at the time. So why is that seen as a problem now?
And don’t even get me started on how they made Flynn look. In the series, he’s turned into a completely different character—dumbed down, less charming, and just... wrong. He’s not the clever rogue who stole Rapunzel’s heart in the movie. He’s a different person altogether, and I refuse to believe he’s the same guy. It's honestly insulting to the character development we saw in Tangled.
At the end of the day, I refuse to count the series as canon. It’s not. The original movie is still my canon, and I firmly believe the writers of the original film intended for Rapunzel and Flynn’s story to end right after the movie, with their love continuing in the short film Tangled Ever After. If the series had never happened, their love story would have been perfect, and I could have continued to enjoy the magic of the movie without this unnecessary and frustrating complication.
The series just isn’t believable. It doesn't fit with the tone of the original movie. And it absolutely doesn't fit with the world that the Brothers Grimm or Basile created. If the writers of the series saw how the original story was meant to be interpreted, they would be spinning in their graves.
So, for my sanity’s sake, I’ll continue to treat the TV series as non-canon. I’ll take my happily-ever-after with Flynn and Rapunzel from the movie and ignore the disaster that came afterward. Disney really missed the mark here, and I just can’t forgive them for ruining such a beautiful love story.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Why I Wish the “Tangled” Series Never Happened: A Rant on Disney’s Betrayal of the Original Story
Tangled is one of my absolute favorite Disney movies. It’s a beautiful, romantic tale about freedom, self-discovery, and finding true love. But honestly? I can’t even think about Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure without wanting to scream because it completely ruins everything that made the original movie so special. And worse, it turns Tangled—and even the Rapunzel fairy tale—into something unrecognizable and disrespectful to the original message.
The series didn’t just take a bad turn—it’s an outright betrayal of the characters and the story. It’s one thing to make a bad sequel, but to mess with such a rich, romantic fairy tale in the process? That’s just cruel.
Flynn Rider: From Charming Rogue to Punching Bag
Let’s talk about Flynn. In Tangled, he was a complex, witty character who had his flaws but grew into a true partner for Rapunzel. He was clever, funny, and more than just a “boyfriend.” He was an equal protagonist with Rapunzel—they both saved each other, and they both had strong arcs.
But in the series? They turned him into a joke. He became this incompetent, bumbling sidekick, constantly belittled by Cassandra and the other characters, while Rapunzel just stood by and let it happen. Where was the Flynn who was so smart and had an edge in the movie? The Flynn who risked everything for Rapunzel? Instead, they made him into this emotional doormat who’s not even given the chance to be a real partner to Rapunzel.
This wasn’t just a bad decision—it was an outright destruction of his character. Flynn deserved better.
Rapunzel: From Selfless Hero to “Feminist” Mary Sue?
Now let’s talk about Rapunzel. I have to ask: what happened to the Rapunzel we fell in love with in Tangled? In the movie, she was brave and selfless, willing to risk her freedom for Flynn. But in the series, suddenly marriage becomes a prison, and Flynn’s constant rejection is somehow acceptable. That’s not the Rapunzel we know and love!
In the original movie, Rapunzel was ready to give up everything for Flynn, including her tower and all the comfort and security she’d known her whole life. She didn’t see their love as a burden or a loss of freedom. But the show rewrites that entire narrative. Suddenly, marriage is portrayed as a trap, and Rapunzel becomes this self-centered, emotionally distant character. She rejects Flynn’s proposal multiple times without even considering how hurtful it is, and she never defends him when Cassandra constantly disrespects him. She keeps secrets from him and lets him be humiliated, all while acting like she’s the one who’s “free” in the relationship. It’s heartbreaking and completely out of character.
Marriage as a "Prison"—Really?
And that brings me to the most infuriating thing: the series’ portrayal of marriage. Marriage in Tangled was supposed to be a celebration of love, a mutual commitment between two people who had gone through so much together. But in the series, marriage is treated like a prison, like a death sentence that would somehow take away Rapunzel’s freedom.
Let’s be real: in Tangled’s world (and the world of the original fairy tale), people didn’t wait years to get married. It was part of the time period’s norms—people got married quickly because that was often the only way for a couple to be together. That’s not something to criticize—it’s historical accuracy. But the series ignores that context entirely. Rapunzel rejecting Flynn’s proposal, especially given the era, just feels wrong. And if you ask me, it sends the wrong message entirely. It implies that if you truly love someone, marriage is something to be feared or avoided.
But in reality? If you love someone, marriage is a way of committing to them, and it certainly shouldn’t be portrayed as a “prison.” Anyone who sees marriage as a trap is probably not in the right relationship. And the fact that Rapunzel keeps rejecting Flynn over and over—when, in the original movie, she was willing to risk everything for him—makes no sense. It’s like she’s been rewritten just to fit some modern, toxic, anti-marriage narrative that has no place in this story.
The Original Tale: Love, Sacrifice, and Freedom
And speaking of the original tale, let’s talk about Rapunzel’s fairy tale roots. The original version of the Rapunzel story, Petrosinella (written by Basile), is actually a romantic love story at its core. In that version, the girl is not a “lost princess” but an ordinary girl who, like many women of that time, had very few options for freedom.
Petrosinella’s escape wasn’t just about her gaining freedom for the sake of freedom—it was about finding love and escaping an abusive situation. Marrying the prince wasn’t a bad thing, as it was often the only way for women to escape from a difficult life. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to marry the man you love—especially if that man is a prince who could give you a better life! Marriage in that context wasn’t about giving up one’s identity—it was about survival and gaining the ability to truly be free. And that’s exactly what Rapunzel does in Tangled.
But of course, the series couldn’t accept that. They turned Rapunzel into a “modern feminist” character who has to be above all that, which is not only historically inaccurate but also just unnecessary. Rapunzel doesn’t need to reject the idea of love and marriage to be strong. In fact, if she truly loved Flynn, she would want to be with him as soon as possible.
And, honestly, anyone who’s criticizing those princesses who married young in the past (Cinderella, Ariel, etc.) clearly doesn’t understand the historical context. They weren’t just getting married for fun—they were getting married to survive and to thrive.
Disney’s Tangled Was Perfect—No Need for the Series
At the end of the day, I wish Disney had left Tangled alone. The movie was perfect in its own right, with Flynn and Rapunzel as equals in a beautiful love story. The series wasn’t necessary, and it certainly wasn’t a worthy addition to the franchise. It ruined the movie, it ruined Flynn, and it turned a story about love and self-discovery into a toxic relationship drama that should never have existed.
It’s not Tangled anymore. And if I had my way, I’d just pretend the series never happened. Because to me, Tangled will always be the original—where love, sacrifice, and freedom come together in a beautiful, timeless way. Anything else? I just can’t accept it as canon.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
How Rapunzel Was Ruined in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure
Rapunzel, the free-spirited, adventurous, and kind-hearted princess we fell in love with in Tangled, was completely ruined in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure. What could have been a beautiful extension of her journey turned into a frustrating, inconsistent, and at times, out-of-character depiction that undermined everything we loved about her in the original movie. Let’s break down how this once-empowered, courageous character was mishandled in the series.
1. The Shift from Independent Princess to "Mary Sue"
In Tangled, Rapunzel was a strong and independent woman. She wasn’t just a princess; she was a survivor. She had spent years in isolation, and her entire world changed when she stepped outside for the first time. Her bravery and willingness to take risks—even when she was terrified—was what made her so relatable and lovable.
But by the time we get to Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, she’s turned into the ultimate "Mary Sue." She can do everything—she’s perfect at everything she tries—whether it’s combat, leadership, or magic. She no longer has to grow or learn new things because, apparently, Rapunzel is just naturally amazing at everything now. She went from being a girl who wanted freedom to one who was overly confident, which made her character feel less grounded and realistic.
It’s frustrating because, in the original Tangled, Rapunzel’s journey was about learning to be brave and find her own voice. In the series, she’s suddenly perfect without that growth, and it strips away the beauty of her development.
2. The Destruction of Rapunzel and Flynn's Relationship
One of the most egregious things about the series is how it completely ruins Rapunzel’s relationship with Flynn. In Tangled, their love story is built on trust, mutual respect, and them helping each other find freedom. They are equal partners, and their dynamic is truly special.
But in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, Rapunzel starts to take Flynn for granted. She keeps secrets from him, allows her best friend Cassandra to constantly insult him, and even rejects his marriage proposal, despite the fact that in the movie, she was willing to give up her entire life for him.
This shift makes no sense. Rapunzel, the same girl who risked everything to save Flynn, now seems completely indifferent to him. The emotional connection between them feels hollow, and Flynn, who was an equal protagonist in the movie, becomes more of a side character in her life. It feels like the series doesn’t know what to do with them as a couple, and as a result, Rapunzel is made to look like a toxic girlfriend who doesn’t value the person she claims to love.
3. The "Rejection of Marriage" Plotline
Rapunzel’s rejection of Flynn’s proposal is another major flaw in the series. In Tangled, marriage was a symbol of their love and commitment to each other. It was a natural progression of their relationship. She was ready to give up everything to be with him, and that’s what made their bond so powerful.
But in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal, and instead of exploring this moment with depth, the show portrays it as a sort of "fear of losing freedom" issue. This is absurd because Rapunzel was willing to give up her freedom to save Flynn in the movie! How could she go from that to now seeing marriage as a "prison"?
Marriage, in their time, wasn’t about control—it was about commitment, and it was the only way for people to be together in a respectable way. The series tries to force a modern-day, anti-marriage narrative into a historical context, and it feels so out of place and unrealistic. It contradicts the very core of Rapunzel’s journey in the movie.
4. The Erasure of Rapunzel’s Vulnerability and Growth
In Tangled, Rapunzel was a vulnerable character. She longed for freedom, for adventure, for a chance to live her life as she chose. But that vulnerability was what made her relatable. She wasn’t perfect, and she was allowed to grow and evolve.
But in the series, Rapunzel’s vulnerability is practically erased. She’s shown to be invincible in many ways, never really facing any consequences for her decisions. When she loses control of her powers or faces difficult challenges, instead of learning from them, she either brushes them off or is bailed out by someone else. It makes her seem like a less complex character than she was in Tangled. She goes from someone who is genuinely conflicted about the world to someone who is almost too perfect, with no room for personal growth or mistakes.
Her growth in the series isn’t as meaningful because, at the core, she no longer feels relatable or real.
5. Rapunzel’s Relationship with Cassandra
One of the major plotlines in the series is Rapunzel’s friendship with Cassandra, which eventually turns toxic. But the way this friendship develops is strange and inconsistent with Rapunzel’s personality in the movie.
Rapunzel was always portrayed as someone who was kind, empathetic, and loyal. But the series flips this on its head, making Rapunzel ignore the red flags about Cassandra for far too long. She continues to trust someone who clearly doesn’t have her best interests at heart, and this leads to Rapunzel making incredibly frustrating decisions, all while ignoring Flynn, who’s been nothing but supportive.
This shift in Rapunzel’s judgment makes her appear naive and emotionally distant, a far cry from the girl we saw in Tangled, who made bold decisions and was never afraid to confront the people she loved when they let her down.
6. The Impact of Modern Feminism on Her Character
One of the biggest issues with Rapunzel’s character in the series is how she is used to push a modern feminist agenda. While feminism is important, the way it’s portrayed in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is problematic. It turns Rapunzel into a superhero who can do no wrong while Flynn, a male character, is repeatedly reduced to being the "dumb boyfriend."
The show pushes this agenda in a way that erases Rapunzel’s humanity, and in doing so, makes her less relatable. Instead of empowering her, it makes her more one-dimensional and less of the nuanced character we fell in love with. True feminism should show men and women as equal partners, supporting and growing with one another—not as one gender constantly saving the other or turning them into a side character.
7. The Overall Loss of Rapunzel’s Depth
At the end of the day, Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure made a huge misstep by taking a character that was complex, vulnerable, and deeply relatable, and reducing her to an overly perfect, one-dimensional figure. The series completely strips away the growth, vulnerability, and relatability that made Rapunzel such a beloved character in Tangled.
It’s clear the show wanted to focus on her magic, her leadership, and her adventures, but in doing so, it lost sight of the heart of Rapunzel’s character—the girl who, in the original film, was finding her way and learning to trust both herself and the people she loved.
Rapunzel deserves better. And, as much as I wanted to enjoy Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, I can’t ignore how it ruined the character we all adored.
1 note ¡ View note
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Why Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure Ruined Flynn and the Love Story
Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure had so much potential to expand on the magic of Tangled—but unfortunately, it took everything that was great about the original movie and turned it on its head. The series completely sidelined Flynn’s character, turning him from an equal partner in Rapunzel’s journey to the cliché of the "dumb boyfriend" trope. The series also ruined their relationship, Rapunzel’s character, and even messed with the historical and emotional aspects of their love. If you’re a fan of the original Tangled movie and the dynamic between Rapunzel and Flynn, there’s so much to hate about how the series treats them.
Flynn Got Reduced to a Side Character
In the original Tangled, Flynn Rider was a co-protagonist alongside Rapunzel. Their relationship wasn’t just a typical romantic subplot; it was a balanced dynamic where they both saved each other. Flynn helped Rapunzel find her freedom, but she also changed him into a better person—showing he wasn’t just a “bad boy” but a deeply complicated and good man underneath. He was every bit her equal.
But in the series, Flynn gets completely sidelined to make room for Cassandra, Rapunzel’s new "best friend" turned villain. His character development is ignored, his trauma never gets addressed, and worst of all, he becomes the "dumb" sidekick. Where was the Flynn who was quick on his feet, clever, and capable of making serious decisions? The series reduces him to an afterthought, and it’s insulting to both his character and the balance of the original movie’s plot.
The constant push for a "Cassandra and Rapunzel" sisterhood dynamic feels like an attempt to mimic the success of Frozen by having two female protagonists, while Flynn gets demoted to a joke. And this is where we enter into the territory of modern feminism, which misrepresents what equality should look like by turning men into weak, one-dimensional characters to uplift women—when true equality should show both sexes growing and supporting each other.
Rapunzel Becomes a Toxic Girlfriend
Now let’s talk about the biggest betrayal—the way Rapunzel treats Flynn. In the series, she becomes a completely toxic girlfriend. Rather than being a partner who values Flynn’s love and support, she lets Cassandra openly insult him, keeps secrets from him, and even rejects his marriage proposals. Does this sound like the same woman who was willing to give up everything for Flynn in the original movie? No, it doesn’t!
In Tangled, Rapunzel not only saved Flynn’s life but also chose to give him her heart. She literally gave up her freedom to save him when he was at death’s door. But now, we’re supposed to believe that this woman, who was willing to risk her life for Flynn, would let another person constantly mistreat him and keep her feelings and intentions a secret? It makes no sense!
Just imagine if the roles were reversed—if Flynn were the one dismissing Rapunzel, allowing his best friend to trash talk her, and then rejecting her proposal. Everyone would call that relationship toxic, and yet here we are, watching Rapunzel do the same thing and it’s somehow acceptable. This is blatant double standards, and it’s infuriating to see Flynn treated this way.
The Inconsistency with Historical Realism
One of the most frustrating things about the series is how it completely ignores the historical context of Rapunzel and Flynn’s time. In the movie, marriage was a crucial part of their relationship and society—back then, couples could only stay together if they were engaged or married. And yet, in the series, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal and then continues dating him like nothing happened. This is not just historically inaccurate, it’s insulting to the original movie.
If the writers wanted to explore Rapunzel and Flynn's relationship in a more modern setting, they should have set the series in today’s world. But instead, they kept the 18th-century setting and ignored the fact that, in their time, marriage was the only way people could be together without being scandalized or ostracized.
Rejecting a proposal back then meant breaking up—period. But the series didn’t care about historical accuracy, and now we’re left with a plot that feels forced and unrealistic.
Marriage is Not a Prison
In the original movie, marriage for Rapunzel wasn’t a trap—it was a symbol of her freedom, a way to be with Flynn on her own terms. But the series turns this concept on its head and portrays marriage as something Rapunzel fears, as if it means she’ll lose her freedom. This portrayal not only feels out of character but also perpetuates a false narrative about what marriage is.
Marriage isn’t a prison—it’s a commitment to someone you love. And if Rapunzel truly loved Flynn, why would she see her future with him as a "trap"? In the movie, she was willing to risk everything for him, including her life. The idea that she would now reject him because marriage seems like a loss of freedom is absurd.
The series not only messes with the romantic narrative but also sends the wrong message about commitment and love. Back in their time, marriage was a celebration of their love, and rejecting that commitment would have meant the relationship was over. If the writers wanted a more modern relationship dynamic, they should have done what Tangled did—celebrate their commitment, not undermine it.
And Don’t Get Me Started on Cassandra
Lastly, let’s talk about Cassandra. She should have never existed. She was clearly created to fill the void left by Flynn, who was reduced to a side character to make space for the new "sister" dynamic. The show tries to mimic Frozen by giving Rapunzel a sister figure, but Cassandra’s backstory doesn’t make sense—especially when you consider that Gothel was obsessed with staying young and couldn’t have had a child. Her entire storyline feels like a forced attempt to copy Frozen's success, and it ruins the dynamic that was once so special between Rapunzel and Flynn.
The Disservice to Flynn and the Tangled Legacy
To sum it all up, Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure did nothing but harm the love story and characters that made Tangled such a masterpiece. Flynn’s character was destroyed, Rapunzel was turned into a toxic girlfriend, and the entire premise of their relationship was undermined for the sake of a sisterhood plot that didn’t even fit. The show is full of historical inaccuracies, contradictions, and a complete disregard for what made the original movie so beloved.
Flynn deserves better. Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure was a disservice to both the characters and the movie’s legacy.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Tangled’s Timeless Romance: Why the Movie’s Love Story is Still the Gold Stand
Tangled, released in 2010, is often celebrated as one of Disney’s finest animated films—an enchanting tale of adventure, love, and self-discovery. But beyond the breathtaking animation and captivating story, Tangled presents something timeless: a love story that’s real, selfless, and full of growth.
In a world of rushed romance plots and characters whose love is more about the spectacle than the emotional journey, Tangled provides an exceptional take on what real love looks like. But, unfortunately, Disney’s Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure series tries to modernize this love story in ways that betray the depth of the characters, particularly Flynn Rider, and turn what was once a beautiful relationship into a confusing, contradictory narrative.
The Foundation of True Love: Sacrifice and Growth
At the heart of Tangled is the undeniable, evolving bond between Rapunzel and Flynn. From the moment they meet, they’re both drastically changed by each other. Flynn, once a selfish thief, learns to value kindness and selflessness. Rapunzel, having spent years in isolation, is finally able to explore the world and take control of her own destiny.
But it’s not just about a magical meeting or shared adventure—it’s about the sacrifices they make for each other. Rapunzel is willing to give up everything, including her freedom, to save Flynn when he’s injured. She is ready to put his life above her own, and that’s a powerful, unspoken promise between them. Flynn, in turn, risks everything to protect Rapunzel and keep her safe from danger. The love they share is built on trust, vulnerability, and mutual respect.
This is real love. Not some idealized fantasy of passion, but the kind of love where two people can’t imagine their lives without the other, because they know they’re better when they’re together. And it’s not about grand declarations or dramatic gestures—it’s about support, growth, and partnership.
Why the Series Misses the Mark
It’s a tragedy that Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure attempts to deconstruct this love story. The show presents a version of Rapunzel who, for some reason, repeatedly rejects Flynn’s proposals and fails to treat him with the same level of respect and care that he’s shown her. In the series, Rapunzel’s behavior toward Flynn is inconsistent, and her treatment of him often borders on dismissive or even callous.
Rather than continuing the love story’s natural progression from the movie, where they are clearly devoted to each other, the show introduces a narrative where Rapunzel doubts her commitment to Flynn and their relationship. She seems to view marriage as a trap, an oppressive decision, even though in the movie, she was willing to give up everything—including her freedom—just to save Flynn. This shift is not only confusing but also feels completely out of line with what was established in the film.
In the context of the movie, marriage wasn’t a "prison" for Rapunzel—it was a symbol of freedom. It was a way for her to live her life with Flynn, not in secret, but openly, without fear of being controlled by her adoptive mother. It was about embracing a future where they could be together, as equals.
The Tangled film captured the reality of how love and commitment would have felt in the setting of the story—marriage was a celebration of that love, and there was nothing oppressive about it.
The Problem with "Modernizing" the Love Story
There’s a larger issue with how Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure tries to “modernize” Rapunzel’s character and the love story. The show, in its attempt to make Rapunzel more independent and self-reliant, seems to suggest that her commitment to Flynn isn’t important, or that she’s somehow afraid of losing her freedom by getting married. Yet, this completely ignores the character’s arc in the original movie. She already chose her freedom when she ran away, and she’s shown to be fully capable of making her own decisions.
Moreover, this idea that marriage is somehow a "trap" is a harmful narrative. Marriage, especially in the context of Tangled, is not about losing one’s identity or freedom. It’s about building a life together—a partnership where both individuals continue to grow and flourish, side by side. And Flynn, being the loving, supportive partner that he is, represents everything that Rapunzel could want in a life companion.
If we look at the era the story is set in, marriage isn’t just a grand tradition—it’s essential for survival. It’s a recognition of societal norms and an affirmation of unity. Rapunzel and Flynn, in this world, are destined to be together in a way that reflects the values of the time period. And yet, the series insists on portraying marriage as a "burden," which undermines everything the original movie stood for.
Marriage as a Symbol of Love, Not a Prison
At the end of Tangled, Rapunzel chooses Flynn, choosing a life of love over a life of solitude. She gives him the best gift she can—her trust, her heart, and her future. But when the series turns around and tries to convince viewers that marriage is somehow a limitation, it not only contradicts the essence of Rapunzel’s character but also distorts the idea of what a healthy, committed relationship should be.
Marriage is not a trap. It’s a mutual decision made by two people who choose to spend their lives together, committed to building something beautiful. It’s about partnership, teamwork, and shared responsibility. It’s about choosing to face the challenges of life together—both the joy and the hardship.
In the context of Tangled, marriage is not the end of Rapunzel’s journey; it’s just the beginning of the next chapter in their life together. Rapunzel is already fully capable of making her own decisions, and if she loved Flynn as much as she did in the movie, she would have no reason to fear marriage. Rather, she would see it as the natural extension of their bond.
Conclusion: The Love Story That Deserves to Stand on Its Own
Ultimately, the original Tangled movie crafted a love story that was both simple and deeply meaningful—one that transcended time and place, focused on mutual respect, personal growth, and sacrifice. The Tangled series’ attempts to modernize the relationship, though, have done more harm than good. The inconsistency in Rapunzel’s character and her refusal to fully embrace Flynn’s love not only hurts the story but also sends the wrong message to viewers about what love, commitment, and marriage should look like.
If Rapunzel truly loved Flynn as much as she did in the film, she would understand that marriage is not a trap, but a bond that celebrates their devotion. It’s a promise to stand by each other, no matter the circumstances. And, in Tangled, that promise is the true heart of their love story.
In the end, Tangled is more than just a fairy tale—it’s a story about love that endures, one that celebrates partnership and the courage to commit. It’s time we return to that version of the story, and leave the inconsistencies of the series behind.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Why Marriage Isn’t a Trap: Why Rapunzel Should Have Wanted to Marry Flynn After Tangled
One of the most frustrating aspects of Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is how the series portrays marriage—especially in the context of Rapunzel and Flynn’s relationship. In the original Tangled movie, Rapunzel’s character was ready to make immense sacrifices for Flynn, including giving up the one thing that had defined her entire life: her freedom.
Yet, in the series, this same Rapunzel is portrayed as fearing marriage, as if it’s some sort of “prison” she must avoid at all costs. But this makes no sense when you consider the character arc she underwent in the movie. She was willing to give up her freedom for Flynn, but now, when marriage is brought up, she suddenly fears she’s giving up her autonomy? This shift in perspective is not only inconsistent with her character, but it also sends a harmful and contradictory message.
So why should marriage not be seen as a trap, and why would it actually make sense for Rapunzel to want to marry Flynn shortly after the events of the movie? Let’s break it down.
Marriage Is Not a Prison
First and foremost, it’s crucial to debunk the idea that marriage is a trap or a form of “confinement.” In a healthy, loving relationship, marriage is about making a lifelong commitment to one another, not about losing your freedom or independence. It’s about partnership, mutual support, and building a future together.
In the original Tangled movie, Rapunzel is shown as someone who craves freedom. She spent 18 years locked away in a tower, yearning for the outside world. Yet, by the end of the film, she’s ready to give up that very freedom—for Flynn. In the movie’s climax, Rapunzel sacrifices her own safety and, ultimately, her freedom to save Flynn’s life. She decides to stay with him, even after she learns the truth about her identity, and she does it willingly.
So why would she now refuse to marry Flynn because she fears losing her freedom? This makes no sense. In the movie, she was willing to give up everything to be with him, including the one thing that defined her entire existence—her freedom. And yet, in the series, we’re told she fears marriage as if it would lock her away in a prison. The very idea is inconsistent with the character we saw in the movie.
Marriage Does Not Mean Losing Your Freedom
Marriage, in Tangled and in real life, does not equate to giving up your freedom. It’s not about being trapped in a relationship where you lose yourself. Instead, it’s about finding someone with whom you want to share your life, dreams, and aspirations. It’s about making a conscious, loving commitment to one another, to build something together—whether it’s a home, a family, or a future.
In Rapunzel and Flynn’s case, they’ve already shown their willingness to sacrifice everything for each other. Rapunzel was willing to give up her freedom, and Flynn was ready to leave his life as a thief behind to be with her. They’ve already taken the leap of trusting each other completely. So why would marriage be a step backward?
It would make perfect sense for Rapunzel to want to marry Flynn right after the events of the movie. They’re both starting new lives. Flynn has left behind his criminal past, and Rapunzel is stepping into her new role as a princess, someone with a lot of responsibilities—but also with a deep love for Flynn. What better way to solidify their commitment and ensure that they can truly be together than through marriage?
Why Marriage Right After the Movie Makes Sense
The timeline of Tangled is important in understanding why marriage would make sense for Rapunzel and Flynn. The story takes place in a time where marriage is the way couples are able to truly be together. While modern relationships may involve dating for years or living together without tying the knot, that wasn’t the reality of the world Tangled is set in. For Rapunzel and Flynn, the only way for them to fully be together and secure a future as a couple would be through marriage.
They spent years apart, and while their relationship evolved in the few days they spent together, they clearly grew emotionally and risked their lives for each other. By the end of the movie, their love is not just superficial or fleeting—it’s deep, profound, and life-changing.
In a historical context, if you truly loved someone and knew you wanted to spend your life with them, waiting years or dragging out the commitment would be unnecessary, especially given the fact that Rapunzel was already in her late teens by the end of the film. There was no reason for them to wait; if anything, they’d likely want to secure their future together as soon as possible after being separated for so long.
Rapunzel was so ready to give up her entire life for Flynn—so why wouldn’t she want to marry him shortly after the events of the movie? The only logical explanation is that she was so deeply in love with him that the thought of building a life together seemed like the natural next step.
Inconsistency with the Movie: Rapunzel’s Character Arc
One of the biggest issues with Rapunzel’s reluctance to marry Flynn in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is how inconsistent it is with her character arc in the original movie. In Tangled, Rapunzel was eager to leave behind her isolated, confined life in the tower to be with Flynn. She was ready to step into the world—despite how much she had been kept from it by Gothel—and start a new chapter in her life.
In the movie, Rapunzel and Flynn share a love that feels deep and genuine. They endure trials together, nearly losing each other multiple times, and yet, they always come back to one another. At the end of the movie, Rapunzel doesn’t hesitate to declare her love for Flynn, and she’s ready to start a new life with him—one that will be free from the constraints of the tower, and one where she gets to choose her future.
So, if Rapunzel was ready to give up her freedom to save Flynn’s life, why wouldn’t she want to marry him shortly afterward? Marriage doesn’t have to mean giving up her identity or her independence; in fact, it can be a way for them to build an even stronger, more meaningful connection.
The way Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure portrays Rapunzel’s hesitation about marriage is a significant departure from her character in the movie. Instead of seeing marriage as a natural, loving step for the couple, the series frames it as something to fear, as if it represents losing everything she worked for. This portrayal undermines the deep bond and trust that was clearly established between Rapunzel and Flynn in the movie.
Marriage = Freedom, Not Confinement
In the context of the world Tangled is set in, marriage was often the only way for people to be truly together. It wasn’t about giving up one’s identity; it was about securing a future where the two people could live together as equals. In the time period of Tangled, it wasn’t unusual for couples to marry soon after becoming serious—especially if they had already gone through life-threatening experiences together, as Rapunzel and Flynn did.
By the end of Tangled, Rapunzel and Flynn are already deeply in love and have experienced enough emotional growth to know that they are right for each other. Their relationship has been tested, and they’ve come through stronger. Given everything they’ve been through, marriage would be a natural next step.
Marriage wouldn’t have been a prison for Rapunzel—it would have been an opportunity to continue building a future together with Flynn. It would have been a way to show her commitment to him and to their love.
Conclusion: Marriage Is a Natural Step After Tangled
To sum it up, marriage is not a prison—it’s a promise. It’s a commitment to a future of shared love and mutual support. In Tangled, Rapunzel and Flynn already demonstrated their willingness to sacrifice everything for each other. They’ve already shown that they are ready for the responsibilities of being together, and marriage would have simply solidified that commitment.
It’s frustrating that Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure tries to paint marriage as something Rapunzel should fear, when, in fact, her character was willing to give up her freedom for Flynn in the movie. This is a major inconsistency with her original arc and sends a confusing message about relationships.
Marriage, in the context of Rapunzel and Flynn’s love, would have been the logical next step in their journey together. It would have been a way to ensure that they could build a life together, free from the constraints of the past. And in Tangled, marriage would have been about freedom, not captivity.
If Rapunzel truly loved Flynn as much as she did in the movie, there’s no reason why she wouldn’t have wanted to marry him. So, for those of us who love the original movie, it’s clear: Marriage is not a trap—it’s a celebration of the love they fought so hard for.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Why Rapunzel’s Treatment of Flynn and Marriage in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is Inconsistent and Unfair
Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure might have been intended to continue the beloved story from Disney’s Tangled, but for many fans, the series doesn’t just feel like a sequel—it feels like a betrayal of the characters and the beautiful love story that was so carefully crafted in the original movie. In the show, Rapunzel’s treatment of Flynn and her entire outlook on marriage are not just inconsistent with the movie, they’re downright frustrating and unfair.
While Tangled beautifully portrayed Rapunzel and Flynn’s love as genuine, deep, and full of growth, the series feels like it dismantles that love story in favor of unnecessary conflict, poor character development, and a harmful message about relationships and commitment. Here’s why this doesn’t sit well, especially for anyone who deeply loves the movie and its message.
Rapunzel’s Treatment of Flynn: A Character Assassination
In the movie, Rapunzel and Flynn go through a profound emotional journey together. Flynn helps Rapunzel break free from the tower, both literally and metaphorically, and they both risk their lives for one another. By the end of the movie, Rapunzel has gone through an enormous amount of growth—from a sheltered, naive girl to someone who takes charge of her own destiny. Flynn, too, evolves from a selfish, manipulative thief to a man who is deeply in love with Rapunzel and willing to sacrifice everything for her. They are both changed for the better by the end of the film, and their love story feels like a perfect culmination of that journey.
But in the series, Rapunzel’s treatment of Flynn goes from loving and appreciative to something far less flattering. She takes him for granted. She keeps secrets from him, often putting herself and her own feelings above his, without considering how her actions affect their relationship. She’s dismissive of his emotions and ideas, and often, he is bullied and belittled by other characters, especially Cassandra. And what does Rapunzel do? She stands by and says nothing, or worse, sides with the person treating Flynn poorly.
This is a massive departure from how Rapunzel behaves in the movie. In the movie, she is curious, thoughtful, and deeply attentive to Flynn. Their relationship is built on mutual trust and respect, and their love for each other is evident in every moment they share. In the series, however, it feels like Flynn is always being cast aside in favor of other characters or her own personal drama—particularly Cassandra. The way Rapunzel disregards Flynn’s feelings is simply unfair to him, especially considering everything they went through together in the movie.
The Inconsistency of Rapunzel’s Views on Marriage
One of the most frustrating aspects of the series is how Rapunzel handles the topic of marriage, especially considering how deeply committed she was to Flynn in the movie.
In Tangled, Rapunzel is willing to give up everything for Flynn. She is so sure of her love for him that, when it comes to saving his life, she defies Gothel, the only mother she has ever known, and risks her own safety and freedom for him. In the end, she is willing to live with Flynn, and the movie implies that they will get married because that’s the only way they can truly be together in the context of the time period the story is set in.
However, in the series, Rapunzel repeatedly rejects Flynn’s marriage proposals, which not only feels out of character but is also incredibly frustrating for the audience. In the movie, Rapunzel was ready to give up her entire life in the tower to be with Flynn, but now, in the series, she seems to view marriage as a prison, something that she feels will take away her freedom.
This completely undermines the essence of their relationship from the original movie. Why would she go from being willing to give up everything to be with Flynn to refusing to marry him? It doesn’t make sense, especially when we consider that they are both deeply in love and have already proven their commitment to one another.
Marriage is portrayed as something Rapunzel is unwilling to embrace, and this is especially evident in episodes like Beyond the Corona Walls. In that episode, she initially rejects Flynn’s proposal without any good reason. She seems to see marriage as some sort of trap or obligation, when in fact, in the movie, she was willing to give up everything for him.
This is not only inconsistent with the Tangled movie, but it also sends a harmful message about commitment and love. If two people are so deeply in love, as Flynn and Rapunzel are, then why would the idea of getting married—an expression of that commitment—be seen as a burden? If anything, marriage in the context of their story should be seen as a beautiful symbol of their love, not a chain.
Marriage in Historical Context: Why This Makes No Sense
The series also gets historical context completely wrong when it comes to marriage. Tangled is set in a time where people married relatively young, and marriage was often necessary for couples to truly be together. There was no modern concept of “dating” for years or “living together” before marriage. In this historical context, marriage was seen as a commitment to the future, and it was necessary to make a relationship official, especially for a princess like Rapunzel.
In the movie, this is clearly reflected in the way Rapunzel and Flynn are portrayed. They are deeply in love, and there is no reason why marriage would be seen as a trap—especially not after all they’ve gone through. If Rapunzel truly loved Flynn, marriage wouldn’t be something she fears—it would be a natural next step in their relationship, one that would give them the freedom to be together without fear of separation.
By portraying marriage in the series as something Rapunzel must avoid, the writers miss the mark in respecting the historical context of their world. Marriage wasn’t a "prison" in that time—it was an agreement to create a future together. In rejecting Flynn’s proposals, Rapunzel is rejecting that future, and by doing so, she is rejecting everything they fought for in the movie.
The Harmful Message About Relationships
Finally, the way the series handles Flynn’s repeated proposals and Rapunzel’s rejection of them sends a harmful message to viewers, especially young ones who look up to Rapunzel as a role model. It suggests that a relationship doesn’t need to be built on commitment and mutual respect. It implies that one person’s needs and desires don’t matter as much as the other’s.
In a healthy relationship, both partners should feel valued and respected. Rapunzel, however, often puts her own feelings and desires above Flynn’s, ignoring the fact that Flynn, who has gone through his own personal growth, has committed to her in every possible way. It’s not fair to Flynn to constantly be put on the back burner, and it’s not healthy for a relationship to work when one person is not equally committed.
Conclusion: Rapunzel and Flynn Deserve Better
In conclusion, Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure takes the beautiful love story that was established in the original movie and turns it into something that feels inconsistent, unfair, and unnecessarily complicated. Rapunzel’s treatment of Flynn and her views on marriage are not only contradictory to the original movie but also send the wrong message about relationships. If Rapunzel truly loved Flynn as much as she did in the movie, then marriage wouldn’t have been something she feared or rejected—it would have been an affirmation of their commitment to one another.
Flynn deserves better, and Rapunzel deserves to realize that the love they share is something worth fighting for—not running from. The series should have honored their relationship instead of using it as a vehicle for unnecessary conflict.
0 notes
tangledmovielove ¡ 2 months ago
Text
Tangled and the Need for Closure: Why the Series Ruined a Perfect Ending
One of the most powerful aspects of Tangled is its sense of closure. The movie ties up all its major plot points and gives us a satisfying, heartfelt ending that feels like a beginning for Flynn and Rapunzel’s future together. They’ve overcome their pasts, faced challenges, and found freedom—and then, the film ends with their wedding, the symbol of everything they’ve been through and all the happiness ahead.
That’s what makes Tangled such a great movie. It’s a story about freedom, love, and choosing each other despite the odds. It doesn’t need a sequel, doesn’t need an extended universe. It’s a complete journey, with every loose end neatly tied up.
So, why, oh why, did Disney feel the need to keep Tangled going with the series?
A Beautiful Story Cut Short… For What?
Let’s be real—most of us love Tangled because it’s a story that stands on its own. Rapunzel, locked away in her tower, dreams of seeing the outside world, and Flynn, a thief with a heart of gold, gets roped into her adventure. They go from two strangers to a deeply connected couple, willing to risk everything for each other by the end of the film. There’s no need for more conflict, more drama, or more episodes—what makes the movie so charming is that it feels like a completed arc.
But then Disney made the series, and with it came the needless conflict. Suddenly, Rapunzel is unsure of Flynn, her commitment wavers, and the couple’s once-strong bond is strained in ways that don’t align with how their relationship was portrayed in the movie. The characters seem to regress, and that leaves fans like me utterly frustrated.
Why Closure Matters
When we watch Tangled, we expect to see Rapunzel and Flynn begin a new chapter of their lives together. We expect them to settle into a sense of peace and partnership, especially after everything they’ve been through. And the movie delivers on that. The ending is the closure we need as viewers, where we know that their love will carry them through whatever comes next.
But the series shatters that feeling of closure. Instead of seeing the couple grow and evolve together, we’re dragged into endless drama and miscommunication. In some episodes, Rapunzel seems to take Flynn for granted, or worse, question their future. She even rejects his marriage proposals. This not only feels inconsistent with the emotional arc they had in the movie, but it undermines the strength of their relationship.
To me, the worst part of the series is how it doesn’t respect the emotional closure of Tangled. Their love story didn’t need more drama. It needed peace, growth, and stability. And that’s what the series, frankly, failed to deliver.
The Problem with Forced Conflict
One of the main issues with the series is the forced conflict that arises simply for the sake of making more episodes. When a story has already achieved emotional and narrative closure like Tangled did, adding more drama or doubt to the central relationship feels unnecessary and frustrating.
For instance, we see Rapunzel keeping secrets from Flynn, letting Cassandra belittle him, and rejecting his marriage proposals. Why? All of this feels out of place. If the movie showed us two people who trusted and loved each other deeply, then why would they need to keep dragging out the idea that Rapunzel is unsure of Flynn or that Flynn is somehow less important to her? It’s just frustrating as a fan who wanted to see these characters grow, not regress.
The show forces us to question what we already knew—that they were meant for each other, and that no amount of outside obstacles could tear them apart. And by adding all this conflict, the series effectively cancels out the emotional resolution of the movie, which is what made the story so satisfying.
Why Tangled Needed No Sequel
The best sequels and spin-offs are the ones that expand on the world or characters in a meaningful way. But the Tangled series doesn’t expand—it rehashes. Instead of exploring the deeper emotional development of Flynn and Rapunzel or even exploring other characters in the world of Tangled, it keeps throwing unnecessary obstacles at the couple that ultimately diminish the beauty of their relationship.
At the end of the movie, Flynn and Rapunzel are both changed. They are ready to start a new chapter of their lives together. This was the perfect ending, and the sequel series should have respected that. Instead, it throws in a storyline that makes the characters seem more immature and unsure than they were in the movie.
The Tragic Fall of Flynn Rider’s Character
And while we’re talking about closure, can we also talk about what the series did to Flynn Rider? Flynn was already a complex character in Tangled. He starts as a selfish, self-centered thief and transforms into a loving, brave man who would sacrifice his life for Rapunzel. That journey is part of what makes him such a compelling character.
But the series… well, let’s just say Flynn becomes a shell of himself. He’s often portrayed as foolish, easily manipulated, and ultimately a puppet to Rapunzel’s decisions. Instead of seeing him as a confident, witty hero, we see him made into the butt of jokes, bullied, and belittled. Where’s the Flynn we fell in love with in the movie? Where’s the guy who had enough strength to lead them on that daring adventure to the lanterns? The series doesn’t just drop the ball with Flynn’s character—it kicks it down the street and leaves it there.
The Need for Real Closure
Ultimately, Tangled didn’t need a series to expand on its story. It had the perfect ending with Tangled Ever After. What the series did was disrupt the emotional journey that had already been completed. There was no need to add unnecessary tension or drama to Rapunzel and Flynn’s relationship, especially when that tension was forced and didn’t fit with their established dynamic.
If Disney wanted to give us more of these characters, they should have found new stories to tell within the Tangled universe—stories that didn’t mess with the resolution the movie gave us. Or at the very least, if the series was going to pick up where the movie left off, it should have respected the strong emotional arc of the characters and their relationship.
For me, the movie will always be the end of the story. Anything that tries to change or “expand” it just feels like a disservice to the beautiful closure Tangled gave us.
Flynn and Rapunzel’s love story was perfect as it was—and sometimes, it’s okay to let things end. We don’t need a sequel or spin-off to tell us that.
0 notes