#antitangledtheseries

[tangledmovielove]

One thing I realized over the holidays is that Rapunzel is called feminist and progressive in that stupid Tangled series for doing something that Ebenezer Scrooge was criticized for in A Christmas carol. Like Scrooge, she constantly postpones marrying her partner because something else was always more important to her. Only that instead of money, it's her absurd concept of freedom.

And just like Scrooge, Rapunzel chooses something abstract and distant (her strange concept of freedom) over something real and tangible (Flynn’s love). In A Christmas Carol, Belle leaves Scrooge because she realizes she deserves more than being neglected for his obsession with wealth, and similarly, Flynn deserves someone who values him for who he is, not someone who dismisses his love or sacrifices for her own self-centered ideals. Flynn is portrayed as being selfless and caring, and for him to stay in a relationship where he is consistently belittled, rejected, and taken for granted is emotionally damaging.

And I think it once again proves a toxic double standard in our society: Scrooge is of course criticized for this behavior and looses Belle forever and there is no redemption of their love because what he did for years is of course unforgivable. But when Rapunzel does the exact same thing, she is celebrated by feminists for being progressive.

The idea that marrying someone you love after months or even a year of being together is somehow stifling is completely nonsensical. If someone genuinely views marriage as a prison, they’re either with the wrong person or not ready for a relationship at all—because deep down, they’re likely considering breaking up or even cheating. True love means wanting to marry your partner, not rejecting them out of fear that marriage will strip you of freedom.

This attitude is a massive red flag and suggests Flynn isn’t the right person for Rapunzel, or worse, that she doesn’t fully love him. How could someone be truly happy with their partner if the very idea of marriage continues to scare them, even after more than a year? Portraying this dynamic as love is deeply misleading—it’s not love at all, and Flynn deserves so much better.

Instead of celebrating the idea of freedom within a loving partnership—where both individuals grow and support each other—the series frames Rapunzel’s independence as something inherently incompatible with marriage. This not only misrepresents the dynamics of a healthy relationship but also sends a discouraging message about what true commitment entails. Flynn’s unwavering devotion is brushed aside, and his willingness to support her dreams is ignored, reducing him to a passive figure in their story.

By focusing on Rapunzel’s internal conflict while sidelining Flynn’s perspective, the series fails to honor the balance and reciprocity that defined their relationship in the movie. Marriage should not be portrayed as a threat to freedom, but rather as a union where both individuals flourish together. In neglecting this, the series turns what could have been a beautiful conclusion into a disappointing misrepresentation of love and partnership.

Marriage isn’t supposed to be a threat to freedom. It’s meant to be a partnership where both people thrive together. By failing to show this, the series misses the chance to give their story the meaningful ending it deserved.

[marie95disneygirl]

Rant on Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure – How the Series Ruined Flynn Rider

I will forever hate this stupid series for what it did to Flynn. Not only did they completely destroy his character, turning him into an arrogant, stupid, and utterly unlikeable person, but they also turned him into the constant punching bag of the show. Flynn, who was clever, witty, and charming in Tangled, has been reduced to a shadow of his former self. His arrogance in the movie was part of an act—a defense mechanism, something that made him endearing, not insufferable. But in the series? He’s just… off.

What frustrates me the most is how Flynn is constantly belittled, bullied, and treated like garbage by Cassandra and other characters, while Rapunzel stands by and does nothing. And when he dares to speak up, she’s the one who gets angry! She never defends him, even though he’s the one who’s being mistreated. Instead, she just takes him for granted, never even apologizing for the horrible things done to him.

She keeps secrets from him, draws his face on a punching bag just to please Cassandra, and never seems to feel guilty about it. She even uses time travel to literally change his personality when he dares to disagree with her, and she’s fine with that! And the worst part? She keeps rejecting his marriage proposals and repeatedly denies him the chance to be with her in any official, committed way. Marriage is apparently a prison to her, despite the fact that in the original movie, she was willing to give up everything to be with him!

Seriously, how does that make sense? How does it make sense that she was ready to give up her entire freedom for him in the movie, and now, after everything they’ve been through, she acts like marriage is the worst thing ever? It completely undermines the emotional weight of their love story in Tangled. In the movie, they were willing to risk everything for each other—so why would she suddenly think marriage is such a prison? It just makes no logical sense, and it sends a horrible message to kids about relationships and commitment.

And here’s what really gets me: if they loved each other so much in Tangled that they were willing to risk their lives for one another after just a few days, then they should have married right away. The time period they’re in—let’s face it—makes it entirely reasonable that they’d marry quickly. Back then, marriage was often the only way to be together, and they were clearly in love. Flynn proposes months after they meet—not a few days! And that’s a perfectly reasonable amount of time to get engaged, especially given the era.

But instead of honoring this established love story, they go down this ridiculous path in the series where Rapunzel questions her commitment to Flynn. She never truly values him in the same way he values her. She doesn’t see marriage as a commitment to the person she loves; she sees it as something that takes away her freedom. And that’s the worst message they could be sending, especially to young viewers.

Marriage isn’t a “prison” in real life—it’s a symbol of commitment and partnership. So why is the show framing it like it’s a burden? And why does Flynn have to be the one who constantly compromises and gives in to Rapunzel’s whims, while she never seems to care about his feelings?

It’s honestly unfair to Flynn. He deserves better than to be treated like a secondary character in his own love story. He deserves to have his feelings valued. He deserves a partner who is equally committed to him, who doesn’t repeatedly reject his offers of marriage. I mean, what man would put up with that in real life? If a man continuously rejected a woman’s proposal, and then acted like he didn’t even care about her needs, it would be called toxic and emotionally abusive. But for some reason, when the roles are reversed, it’s considered acceptable.

And yes, I understand that Rapunzel has her own trauma—but so does Flynn! He grew up unloved, alone in an orphanage and on the streets, and yet he still manages to treat Rapunzel with kindness, respect, and love. He didn’t let his past turn him into a cruel or selfish person. So why does she get a free pass while he’s treated like garbage? He didn’t deserve any of this, and it honestly makes me angry to think about.

There’s also the issue of Flynn’s entire character being destroyed. The man we saw in Tangled was a charming, witty, somewhat selfish rogue who grew into a devoted partner. But in the series, he’s just… dumbed down. His charisma is gone. He’s not even recognizable as the same person. He’s turned into a joke, and honestly, I refuse to believe that the Flynn in the series is the same character from the movie. I just can’t buy it.

What they did to Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is heartbreaking. They ruined Flynn. They ruined the love story. And the worst part is they did it all for some misguided notion of “modern feminism” or to make a show more “progressive.” But they didn’t have to ruin what was already a beautiful love story. They didn’t have to destroy Flynn’s character to make some ridiculous point about independence or freedom.

And the final kicker? If I had to count the series as canon, I’d rather Flynn stayed dead at the end of the movie than suffer through this toxic, messed-up relationship dynamic. At least in the original movie, their love story felt pure and real, but the series just turned everything sour. It feels like a different universe.

So, I refuse to count it as canon. I will always prefer Tangled as the true continuation of their story, and the series? Well, it’s a mess I can’t even bother with. It just doesn’t fit.

Flynn deserves better, and Rapunzel deserves to recognize that before it’s too late

[tangledmovielove]

I can’t believe how badly Tangled: The Series treats Flynn Rider. His entire character seems to have been dismantled and warped, and it’s honestly heartbreaking for anyone who loved him in the original movie. Flynn was once a brave, intelligent, and resourceful guy with a complicated past. He put his life on the line for Rapunzel and opened up to her in ways he’d never done with anyone else. And yet, in the series, he’s treated like a punching bag��both literally and emotionally!

Let’s start with the way everyone around him constantly insults him. Rapunzel, who supposedly loves him, just stands by while he’s mocked, belittled, and treated like he doesn’t matter. It’s not just a one-time thing, either; it’s a constant barrage of disrespect from people she cares about. And Rapunzel herself contributes to it! She even draws his face on a punching bag as a joke, which is so cruel and out of character for someone who claims to love him. Who does that to someone they care about?

And it gets even worse. She travels back in time to try and “fix” his personality, as if he’s a problem to be solved, not a person with his own journey and growth. Rapunzel goes to these lengths to change who he is, yet shows no remorse or guilt afterward. In fact, her actions suggest that she sees his entire personality as an inconvenience—something to be “improved” to fit her ideal. That is not love; it’s manipulation. The Flynn we saw in the movie was willing to sacrifice everything for Rapunzel, but in the series, she can’t even respect who he truly is.

The worst offense of all is her rejection of his marriage proposal. In the original movie, they both sacrificed their safety and freedom for each other, and Rapunzel was ready to face any danger just to be with him. Now, the series tries to tell us that marriage would somehow “trap” her, as if committing to Flynn would hold her back. It’s painfully inconsistent, especially when we remember that she was willing to face literal prison for him in the movie. Why is marriage suddenly such a burden to her when Flynn was ready to give everything for her happiness?

Flynn is shown as if he’s just there to revolve around Rapunzel’s life, with his own dreams and desires barely acknowledged. He’s treated like a follower, an accessory, a background character whose feelings and opinions don’t matter. Rapunzel barely considers his perspective, often putting everyone and everything above him, which makes it seem like she’s only with him because he admires her so much—almost as if she enjoys having someone to worship her without actually respecting him in return. It’s sad to watch a character who was once confident and heroic be reduced to a supporting role in his own life.

At this point, it’s clear Flynn deserves better. His love and loyalty are brushed aside, his sacrifices ignored, and his personality demeaned by the very person who once loved him deeply. The Tangled movie showed us a romance built on mutual growth, respect, and sacrifice, but the series has thrown that away for a dynamic that feels toxic and unfair. Flynn deserves a partner who genuinely respects him, who values his thoughts and opinions, and who doesn’t see him as a “fixer-upper” or a prop. Rapunzel doesn’t deserve Flynn if she can’t respect him as an equal.

For all the fans who loved Flynn’s character in Tangled, the series doesn’t do him justice. He’s a complex character who’s more than just a sidekick, and his love story deserves to be one that honors his sacrifices and respects his identity.

I’ve had it (emotional time)

Just… here’s a “Keep reading” if you want to actually see this hell-whole of a post because . .  . if you enjoyed the episode: fantastic. It does actually hurt me inside when we can’t all agree on whether or not an episode is good or not, so if you want to avoid my rant about Eugene’s character in this show, go right ahead. Basically below is a lot of internal screaming and ranting about how Eugene isn’t treated right as a character and he deserves more time and blahblahblah. So … yeah. TL:DR not a fan of this episode.

Weiterlesen

[tangledmovielove]

I’ve noticed a frustrating double standard when it comes to critiquing media. Feminists and modern critics are often applauded for tearing apart older Disney princess movies, calling out perceived flaws in classics like Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, or The Little Mermaid. Yet, when someone like me dares to criticize something newer—like the Tangled series—I’m met with hostility and insults, as if my opinion is somehow invalid.

Why is it okay to bash older movies for being “problematic” but not okay to call out issues in newer media? Especially when these newer stories, like the Tangled series, send questionable messages themselves. For example, it’s baffling to me that rejecting a loving, committed marriage relationship with someone you were literally willing to sacrifice everything for is framed as a “modern, empowering” message. How does that make sense, especially in a historical context where marriage was often the only path to freedom for women?

Critiquing media isn’t about hating on something people love—it’s about pointing out flaws and inconsistencies that affect how we perceive these stories. I don’t hate the Tangled movie—I love it! That’s why I’m so passionate about this. But the series undoes so much of what made the movie beautiful, and I feel like I should be allowed to talk about that without being insulted or dismissed.

Art and media are meant to be discussed, debated, and even critiqued. It’s fine if you don’t agree with my perspective, but dismissing it outright or insulting me for holding it isn’t fair. If we can analyze and deconstruct older stories, we should also be able to do the same with modern ones.

At the end of the day, all I’m asking for is respect for my perspective, just like I respect that others might feel differently. Disagreeing is part of the conversation, but that conversation should be thoughtful, not hurtful.

[tangledmovielove]

Double Standards Are So Fun

Apparently, it’s totally fine to criticize older Disney princesses like Cinderella, Ariel, and Aurora because they’re ‘anti-feminist’ and ‘bad role models.’

But the second I say anything about how Rapunzel’s actions in the Tangled series make zero sense, suddenly I’m a monster who doesn’t understand ‘modern storytelling’ or ‘strong female characters.’

Cinderella: Works herself to the bone as a literal servant and still dares to dream of a better life—too passive! Ariel: Risks her life for her dream and love—bad example for girls! Aurora: Only sleeps for a curse to be broken—boring and outdated!

But Rapunzel in the series? Rejects the proposal of the man she apparently loves because she feels like a life with him is a prison, dismisses his feelings, draws his face on a punching bag, lets her bestie bully him, and rewrites his personality with time travel—ICONIC! RELATABLE! EMPOWERING!

Got it. Criticizing older princesses = totally fine. Criticizing Rapunzel for toxic behavior = misogynistic and wrong. Makes perfect sense.

[tangledmovielove]

How Rapunzel Was Ruined in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure

Rapunzel, the free-spirited, adventurous, and kind-hearted princess we fell in love with in Tangled, was completely ruined in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure. What could have been a beautiful extension of her journey turned into a frustrating, inconsistent, and at times, out-of-character depiction that undermined everything we loved about her in the original movie. Let’s break down how this once-empowered, courageous character was mishandled in the series.

1. The Shift from Independent Princess to "Mary Sue"

In Tangled, Rapunzel was a strong and independent woman. She wasn’t just a princess; she was a survivor. She had spent years in isolation, and her entire world changed when she stepped outside for the first time. Her bravery and willingness to take risks—even when she was terrified—was what made her so relatable and lovable.

But by the time we get to Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, she’s turned into the ultimate "Mary Sue." She can do everything—she’s perfect at everything she tries—whether it’s combat, leadership, or magic. She no longer has to grow or learn new things because, apparently, Rapunzel is just naturally amazing at everything now. She went from being a girl who wanted freedom to one who was overly confident, which made her character feel less grounded and realistic.

It’s frustrating because, in the original Tangled, Rapunzel’s journey was about learning to be brave and find her own voice. In the series, she’s suddenly perfect without that growth, and it strips away the beauty of her development.

2. The Destruction of Rapunzel and Flynn's Relationship

One of the most egregious things about the series is how it completely ruins Rapunzel’s relationship with Flynn. In Tangled, their love story is built on trust, mutual respect, and them helping each other find freedom. They are equal partners, and their dynamic is truly special.

But in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, Rapunzel starts to take Flynn for granted. She keeps secrets from him, allows her best friend Cassandra to constantly insult him, and even rejects his marriage proposal, despite the fact that in the movie, she was willing to give up her entire life for him.

This shift makes no sense. Rapunzel, the same girl who risked everything to save Flynn, now seems completely indifferent to him. The emotional connection between them feels hollow, and Flynn, who was an equal protagonist in the movie, becomes more of a side character in her life. It feels like the series doesn’t know what to do with them as a couple, and as a result, Rapunzel is made to look like a toxic girlfriend who doesn’t value the person she claims to love.

3. The "Rejection of Marriage" Plotline

Rapunzel’s rejection of Flynn’s proposal is another major flaw in the series. In Tangled, marriage was a symbol of their love and commitment to each other. It was a natural progression of their relationship. She was ready to give up everything to be with him, and that’s what made their bond so powerful.

But in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, Rapunzel rejects Flynn’s proposal, and instead of exploring this moment with depth, the show portrays it as a sort of "fear of losing freedom" issue. This is absurd because Rapunzel was willing to give up her freedom to save Flynn in the movie! How could she go from that to now seeing marriage as a "prison"?

Marriage, in their time, wasn’t about control—it was about commitment, and it was the only way for people to be together in a respectable way. The series tries to force a modern-day, anti-marriage narrative into a historical context, and it feels so out of place and unrealistic. It contradicts the very core of Rapunzel’s journey in the movie.

4. The Erasure of Rapunzel’s Vulnerability and Growth

In Tangled, Rapunzel was a vulnerable character. She longed for freedom, for adventure, for a chance to live her life as she chose. But that vulnerability was what made her relatable. She wasn’t perfect, and she was allowed to grow and evolve.

But in the series, Rapunzel’s vulnerability is practically erased. She’s shown to be invincible in many ways, never really facing any consequences for her decisions. When she loses control of her powers or faces difficult challenges, instead of learning from them, she either brushes them off or is bailed out by someone else. It makes her seem like a less complex character than she was in Tangled. She goes from someone who is genuinely conflicted about the world to someone who is almost too perfect, with no room for personal growth or mistakes.

Her growth in the series isn’t as meaningful because, at the core, she no longer feels relatable or real.

5. Rapunzel’s Relationship with Cassandra

One of the major plotlines in the series is Rapunzel’s friendship with Cassandra, which eventually turns toxic. But the way this friendship develops is strange and inconsistent with Rapunzel’s personality in the movie.

Rapunzel was always portrayed as someone who was kind, empathetic, and loyal. But the series flips this on its head, making Rapunzel ignore the red flags about Cassandra for far too long. She continues to trust someone who clearly doesn’t have her best interests at heart, and this leads to Rapunzel making incredibly frustrating decisions, all while ignoring Flynn, who’s been nothing but supportive.

This shift in Rapunzel’s judgment makes her appear naive and emotionally distant, a far cry from the girl we saw in Tangled, who made bold decisions and was never afraid to confront the people she loved when they let her down.

6. The Impact of Modern Feminism on Her Character

One of the biggest issues with Rapunzel’s character in the series is how she is used to push a modern feminist agenda. While feminism is important, the way it’s portrayed in Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure is problematic. It turns Rapunzel into a superhero who can do no wrong while Flynn, a male character, is repeatedly reduced to being the "dumb boyfriend."

The show pushes this agenda in a way that erases Rapunzel’s humanity, and in doing so, makes her less relatable. Instead of empowering her, it makes her more one-dimensional and less of the nuanced character we fell in love with. True feminism should show men and women as equal partners, supporting and growing with one another—not as one gender constantly saving the other or turning them into a side character.

7. The Overall Loss of Rapunzel’s Depth

At the end of the day, Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure made a huge misstep by taking a character that was complex, vulnerable, and deeply relatable, and reducing her to an overly perfect, one-dimensional figure. The series completely strips away the growth, vulnerability, and relatability that made Rapunzel such a beloved character in Tangled.

It’s clear the show wanted to focus on her magic, her leadership, and her adventures, but in doing so, it lost sight of the heart of Rapunzel’s character—the girl who, in the original film, was finding her way and learning to trust both herself and the people she loved.

Rapunzel deserves better. And, as much as I wanted to enjoy Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure, I can’t ignore how it ruined the character we all adored.

[tangledmovielove]

Why I Can’t Stand Tangled: The Series Rapunzel – She’s the Complete Opposite of the Character I Loved

I loved Rapunzel in Tangled—she was brave, kind, and selfless. But the Rapunzel in Tangled: The Series feels so unlike her movie counterpart that I can’t stand her character in this show.

In the movie, Rapunzel was a character who would do anything for Flynn. She was willing to sacrifice her freedom, her life, and everything she knew because of her love for him. Their relationship was about mutual trust, loyalty, and deep selflessness. But in Tangled: The Series, Rapunzel is almost unrecognizable. She comes across as self-centered, indecisive, and constantly dismisses Flynn’s feelings and opinions. Her behavior feels so out of character that it’s hard to see her as the same person.

One of the most frustrating things is the way she allows others—especially Cassandra—to insult and belittle Flynn. He’s constantly made the butt of jokes and treated poorly by those around him, and Rapunzel rarely, if ever, stands up for him. In fact, when he speaks up for himself, she often sides against him! Flynn has a mind of his own, but in the series, Rapunzel seems to dismiss his opinions and needs as if they don’t matter. The Rapunzel from the movie would never treat him this way.

The Marriage Rejection: A Major Betrayal One of the biggest disappointments is Rapunzel’s reaction to Flynn’s marriage proposal. In the movie, she loved him so much that she was willing to give up everything for him. She even offered to stay locked in the tower forever just to save his life. But in the series, she rejects his proposal, acting as if marriage is somehow a prison for her. This not only feels out of character, but it’s also insulting to Flynn, who’s putting his heart on the line only to have her brush him off. It sends a terrible message, suggesting that true love isn’t enough for her unless it’s always on her terms.

What makes this rejection feel even worse is that it’s not even based on any logical reason. They’ve known each other for months, and considering the historical time period, marriage would be the natural next step. And yet, Rapunzel hesitates, as if she’s constantly questioning her love for Flynn. For a character who was willing to give up everything for him in the movie, this lack of commitment is a complete betrayal of who Rapunzel was supposed to be.

The Constant Manipulation and Lack of Accountability Throughout the series, Rapunzel hides secrets from Flynn, manipulates situations, and uses time travel to “fix” Flynn’s personality when he dares to disagree with her. This kind of behavior is controlling and unfair, but she never seems to feel guilty or take responsibility. She even draws his face on a punching bag to please Cassandra, never apologizing or showing concern for how hurtful that could be to someone she supposedly loves.

By the end of the series, it feels like everything always has to go her way, while Flynn’s needs and feelings are constantly ignored or trampled over. Rapunzel’s treatment of him is selfish and dismissive, as if she only cares about him when it’s convenient for her. This kind of behavior feels toxic, and it’s not the love story I remember from the movie.

The Hypocrisy of Tangled: The Series Rapunzel The Rapunzel in the series is not the fairytale character she was meant to be. She’s the opposite of the girl from the movie who was ready to sacrifice everything for love and freedom. Her behavior is hypocritical: she rejects Flynn’s love and commitment, takes him for granted, and constantly lets others disrespect him. If anything, the series’ version of Rapunzel treats Flynn more like a sidekick who’s there to serve her than a partner she truly cares about.

The movie’s Rapunzel was kind, selfless, and full of love. But the series’ version seems like someone else entirely—self-centered, ungrateful, and unwilling to compromise.

For me, this isn’t Rapunzel at all. It’s a poor rewrite of the character, turning her into someone who acts selfishly and constantly overlooks the love of someone who’s been nothing but supportive and devoted. This series doesn’t deserve to be canon, and I’ll always remember the real Rapunzel as the one from the movie who knew the true meaning of love and selflessness.

rapunzel is an absolute piece of shit. anyone who likes her is questionable x.

[tangledmovielove]

Tangled is One of My Favorite Disney Movies – But I Hate the TV Series

Tangled has always been one of my favorite Disney movies, and I absolutely adore the love story of Rapunzel and Flynn. However, there’s something I absolutely cannot stand: the Tangled TV series. It ruined everything for me, and if I have to consider the series as canon, it would completely destroy my love for the original film.

It’s honestly painful how they trashed Flynn’s character and their entire relationship just to cater to some misguided notion of modern feminism and "progressive" ideals. They’ve turned Flynn into a bumbling fool, completely ruining the clever, charming, and smart character he was in the original movie. And worse yet, they’ve stripped Rapunzel of her independence and made her doubt the very love she so clearly shared with Flynn in the film.

What infuriates me the most is how the series portrayed the idea of rejecting a marriage proposal and then staying together as if that was somehow a healthy or sensible thing to do. In the time period this story is set, marriage wasn’t just about a wedding ceremony—it was about being together, about having a future, about building a life with someone. Back then, people married young because it was often the only way they could truly be together. Flynn’s proposal in the movie wasn’t rushed—it was a natural progression of their deep love for each other, especially given the era they lived in.

But in the series, the message is clear: marriage is a prison—even if you love someone deeply, even if you’ve been together for months or years. This is a terrible message, and it’s absurd. If you love someone, you want to marry them. You don’t reject them because you feel like it will strip you of your freedom. That’s a red flag that implies you don’t actually see a future with them. Marriage isn’t a trap—it’s a symbol of commitment and love. If someone considers marriage to be a prison, they’re subconsciously thinking about cheating or breaking up. And that’s not love!

The historical inaccuracy is also glaring. Back in the time period this story is set in, marriage was the way for two people to be together. There was no “waiting for a few years to decide” because society didn’t allow that. No one could just live together as a couple back then, especially if you were a princess. The idea that Rapunzel and Flynn should have waited years to get married is ridiculous. If anything, they should have been portrayed as a couple eager to get married as soon as possible because that’s what would have made sense for their time.

And don't get me started on how the series turned Rapunzel into a fighting, modern-day “Mary Sue” girlboss character. In the original fairy tale, Rapunzel was already empowered—she made decisions for herself, let the prince into her tower, and plotted her own escape. The only thing that’s different in the series is that they’ve amped up her physical strength to make her more “modern” and “feminist,” as if it wasn’t already clear from the original that she was no damsel in distress. This change in her character feels unnecessary and forced, and it completely undermines the beauty of the original tale, Petrosinella, where her love for the prince was a true source of freedom, not a burden.

To add to my frustration, I despise how they twisted the whole narrative to fit a “modern feminist” agenda. The original Rapunzel (or Petrosinella, as it’s known in Basile’s version) is a beautiful love story, and Disney’s series ruined that. Rapunzel was a girl in an oppressive situation who found freedom and love in the prince, which was an empowering message. She wasn't just waiting for a man, she was waiting for a future and a life outside the tower—and a marriage to a prince was the way to escape. That was reality for women at the time. So why is that seen as a problem now?

And don’t even get me started on how they made Flynn look. In the series, he’s turned into a completely different character—dumbed down, less charming, and just... wrong. He’s not the clever rogue who stole Rapunzel’s heart in the movie. He’s a different person altogether, and I refuse to believe he’s the same guy. It's honestly insulting to the character development we saw in Tangled.

At the end of the day, I refuse to count the series as canon. It’s not. The original movie is still my canon, and I firmly believe the writers of the original film intended for Rapunzel and Flynn’s story to end right after the movie, with their love continuing in the short film Tangled Ever After. If the series had never happened, their love story would have been perfect, and I could have continued to enjoy the magic of the movie without this unnecessary and frustrating complication.

The series just isn’t believable. It doesn't fit with the tone of the original movie. And it absolutely doesn't fit with the world that the Brothers Grimm or Basile created. If the writers of the series saw how the original story was meant to be interpreted, they would be spinning in their graves.

So, for my sanity’s sake, I’ll continue to treat the TV series as non-canon. I’ll take my happily-ever-after with Flynn and Rapunzel from the movie and ignore the disaster that came afterward. Disney really missed the mark here, and I just can’t forgive them for ruining such a beautiful love story.

[tangledmovielove]

Flynn’s an incredibly endearing character—funny, selfless, and deeply loving—and it’s heartbreaking to see him put in a position where his devotion and commitment to Rapunzel aren’t reciprocated with the same depth of love and respect.

Rejecting a marriage proposal, especially in the context of their story, is indeed a massive blow. It can come across as “I don’t see our relationship as serious or permanent enough for that commitment.” And for Flynn, who has always shown that he’s all in when it comes to Rapunzel, it’s unfair and dismissive of his feelings and efforts. The fact that Rapunzel stays in the relationship after rejecting the proposal just adds insult to injury—it keeps him in a state of uncertainty, which must be deeply painful for someone who has already made such a clear choice about his future and makes it seem like Rapunzel only wants the benefits of being in a relationship without having to commit.

Historically, marriage was the only way they could really be together, socially and physically. To reject that for a reason like “it’s a prison” undermines what marriage actually represents in the time and the context of their relationship. Flynn doesn’t treat her like property or try to limit her freedom; he wants a partnership and a future together. He’s not saying, “You’ll be mine,” he’s saying, “I want us to be us forever.”

In the original fairy tale by the Brothers Grimm, Rapunzel saw marriage as liberation—a chance to escape the witch’s control and find happiness with someone who truly loved her. For Disney to flip that into “marriage equals loss of freedom” is not just a strange take but also feels antithetical to the spirit of the story. Marriage in the original fairy tale was an act of rebellion against confinement, and it’s tragic that Disney turned it into something Rapunzel feared rather than embraced.

And besides, the lack of a clear direction for their relationship would undoubtedly hurt Flynn deeply and would cause the relationship to break down in real life. Flynn’s feelings do matter. He’s not just some side character who exists to revolve around Rapunzel; he’s a person with his own desires, needs, and dreams. It’s incredibly frustrating that the series downplays his perspective while elevating Rapunzel’s flawed reasoning as something admirable or progressive. It’s not progressive to dismiss a partner’s feelings in a relationship—it’s hurtful and unfair. Flynn’s feelings are important, and he deserves a partner who sees his love for what it is: a beautiful, selfless gift.

The way Rapunzel is written in the series does feel like a betrayal of her movie character, and it’s deeply disappointing when a beloved character is twisted into someone unrecognizable—someone who behaves in ways that seem to contradict their core values and past actions.

There is also connection in real life between seeing marriage as a prison and the subconscious thoughts of cheating or breaking up. The series makes Rapunzel’s rejection of Flynn’s proposal feel not just like a slap in the face to Flynn, but also like a sign that she doesn’t value or understand the gravity of their relationship. It undermines all the growth, love, and commitment we saw in the movie, where she was willing to die for Flynn and vice versa. It’s as if the series Rapunzel forgot what true love looks like and instead fell into self-absorption, valuing her abstract idea of “freedom” more than the tangible love and partnership she has with Flynn. If someone truly sees a life of love and partnership as a prison, it shows a lack of respect and appreciation for their partner’s feelings and needs. The logic is baffling, especially given that Flynn never once acted like someone who wanted to control her or restrict her freedom. He loved her for who she was and was willing to follow her wherever she wanted to go, even if it meant leaving behind his own dreams.

I can see how much he gives, how selflessly and deeply he loves Rapunzel, and it’s heartbreaking to watch him be treated so poorly by someone who seems to have forgotten how much he matters. The fact that movie Rapunzel was so wonderful, loving, and committed only makes the series version feel more jarring and unfair. Flynn is a treasure—he’s thoughtful, supportive, funny, and fiercely loyal. It’s incredibly frustrating to see that loyalty met with rejection and disregard.

[tangledmovielove]

A girl refusing to marry the man she loved so much that she wanted to go to prison for him for all eternity, because she feels like it would somehow strip her of her freedom in an 18th century setting where marriage was the only way to be together publicly and physically, is more unrealistic to me than a girl with 70 feet of magical hair.

[tangledmovielove]

Please no! I still have hope that Disney is now learning and will completely ignore the series in the live action series and instead give us the movie exactly like it was.

I'm also still hoping and praying that they will end the remake with their wedding and not frame marriage as a prison again. I mean, Disney managed to get the tone right with the Aladdin remake, allowing Jasmine and Aladdin to marry at the end. So, there is still hope even though I know that it's unlikely.

Calling it now: if Tangled LA Remake happens they'll base it not on the original movie (Disney's last female driven and empowering princess story before the company turned to daughters transforming mothers into literal animals to have their way and labeling it as "feminist", Hans twists telling women they are "desperate for love" and are blamed for male abuse and other pseudo-progressive narratives) but on the series. Which fully embrace and perpetuate Disney's current pseudo-feminist trends and completely misrepresent the characters and the title romance.

Thus, in the remake, Flynn/Eugene will be either written out completely (like Shang from the LA Mulan - because a heroine having two daddy figures instead of a love interest she has chosen is so much more progressive) or replaced by Cass*ndra from the series. The climax will be reworked to have the same pandering, faux feminist twist with Rapunzel cutting off her hair on her own because she is such a "girlboss" now and not a victim of lifelong abuse and gaslighting who needed to be helped out of it, just like other victims do.

And just like in the series, Rapunzel will be doing it for Cass*ndra because when Flynn/Eugene sacrificed his life for Rapunzel's freedom and agency it was "not feminist" and "made her weak". But it is an "improvement and fixing the original" when Rapunzel terminates her magic hair's qualities for a female character who, from the very first episode, started to act in the "I know best" manner. Except unlike in Gothel's case the series' narrative framed it as her being strong and "badass" (passive aggressiveness and pushing boundaries is only bad when older women do it, didn't you know?/#hashtag feminism).

[marie95disneygirl]

My ranking of the weddings from Walt Disney Animation studios

Ariel and Eric- the little mermaid

The perfect fairy tale wedding. Everything is right for this scene: Ariel’s dress is beautiful, Ariel and Eric are a cute couple, all her friends and family are there, Ariel has a nice goodbye scene with her father, and they sail off into the sunset at the end. I don’t think this could be done better and that scene at the end of the movie is so satisfying after everything Ariel endured in the movie. I just love this wedding, it’s perfect.

2. Robin Hood and Maid Marian- Robin Hood

Robin Hood and Maid Marian are such a cute couple, one of my favorite Disney couples and their wedding is wonderful. All the cute characters and children of the movie are there, and the fashion is beautiful. And I also just love how they got engaged during a fight earlier in the movie. And this wedding is the perfect ending to the movie.

3. Roger and Anita and Pongo and Perdi- 101 Dalmatians

This is a special case because it’s the only double wedding there is, and I love it for that. Also, Roger and Anita as well as Pongo and Perdi are two of the healthiest Disney couples there are and I love that this takes place early in the story and that we get to see the couples together after they are married, proving that you can still have adventures when you are married and have fun and pretty much live however you want, exactly as you did before but now have someone to love you at your side which is a great message.

4. Cinderella and Prince Charming- Cinderella

I didn’t expect this to be so high on this list, but there are not that many Disney weddings and this is still a magical fairy tale wedding. And besides, this ending is probably one of the most satisfying endings in Disney history after everything Cinderella went through.

5. Tiana and Naveen- The princess and the frog

This wedding has great fashion and it’s cute that they got to do it twice but I don’t like it that much. I’m just not that much of a fan of Tiana and Naveen as a couple and I think Tiana deserved someone better. But it’s still a great ending of the movie and I love that Tiana was allowed to get married at the end despite not knowing Naveen for years because it makes sense for their time.

6. Katrina and Brom Bones- the adventures of Ichabod and Mr Toad

I don’t like this couple. It’s obvious in the movie that Katrina is just playing with Brom and all the other men and just wants someone who worships her all the time.

7. Calhoun and Felix- Wreck-it Ralph

I don’t like this couple or this movie, I’m sorry. Also, this just proves Disney’s hypocrisy because these two were allowed to be married at the end of the movie despite not having been dating for years and despite the fact that this takes place in a modern time when it was possible for couples to even be together for a long time before getting married while Rapunzel and Flynn weren’t despite their story taking place in a time were people had to  marry early.

8. Rapunzel and Flynn Rider- Tangled ever after

This is now the absolute worst wedding for me after watching that stupid, terrible TV show that completely destroyed their relationship! Now, all I can think about when I watch this is how Rapunzel rejected him for years and acted like marrying him would be some horrible trap or prison that would take away her freedom despite the fact that she was literally willing to go to prison for all eternity and give up her entire freedom just for him in the movie. How the hell does this make sense? It makes Rapunzel look like a terrible hypocrite and a stupid witch who doesn’t deserve this treasure of a man who once literally died for her! And it's so horrible how they send the message that marriage is a prison and it's so ridiculous how sacrificing yourself for someone you just met is considered all right but not marrying a person you love after months or even a whole year of being together. If someone genuinely views marriage as a prison, they’re either with the wrong person or not ready for a relationship at all—because deep down, they’re likely subconsciously considering breaking up or even cheating. And it really seems like the writer of this series would have also preferred to have her end up with Cassandra which just proves the theory that Rapunzel probably thought about cheating on him. True love means wanting to marry your partner, not rejecting them out of fear that marriage will somehow strip you of freedom. This attitude is a massive red flag and suggests Flynn isn’t the right person for Rapunzel, or worse, that she doesn’t fully love him. How could someone be truly happy with their partner if the very idea of marriage continues to scare them, even after more than a year? Portraying this dynamic as love is deeply misleading—it’s not love at all, and Flynn deserves so much better. Adding to this frustration is the glaring historical inaccuracy. Back then, people—especially princesses—married early because it was often the only way to be together, both socially and physically. In that context, marrying after a few months of knowing someone was perfectly normal and expected from society. It’s unfair to criticize the earlier Disney princesses for marrying quickly when it was true to their time and culture. What’s even more ridiculous is that the series contradicts this by dragging out Rapunzel and Flynn’s relationship for years while still having her reject his proposal. No one—historically or even today—should remain in a relationship after such a rejection. It’s a profound slap in the face and shows irreconcilable differences in values. If Rapunzel truly loved Flynn, she would have embraced marriage rather than seeing it as a trap.

This series has completely ruined the short film for me. Rapunzel does NOT deserve Flynn, and she certainly does NOT deserve to marry him after treating him—and their relationship—with such disregard. The fact that she stays in the relationship after rejecting his proposal only makes it worse. It keeps Flynn in a state of painful uncertainty, making it seem like Rapunzel just wants the benefits of a relationship without having to commit. This wedding should never have happened because the series destroyed the foundation of their relationship. Now, it only paints Rapunzel as selfish and hypocritical while Flynn comes across as someone with no self-respect. Flynn’s feelings do matter. He’s not just some side character who exists to revolve around Rapunzel; he’s a person with his own desires, needs, and dreams. It’s incredibly frustrating that the series downplays his perspective while elevating Rapunzel’s flawed reasoning as something admirable or progressive. It’s not progressive to dismiss a partner’s feelings in a relationship—it’s hurtful and unfair. Flynn’s feelings are important, and he deserves a partner who sees his love for what it is: a beautiful, selfless gift. It’s as if the series Rapunzel forgot what true love looks like and instead fell into self-absorption, valuing her abstract idea of “freedom” more than the tangible love and partnership she has with Flynn. If someone truly sees a life of love and partnership as a prison, it shows a lack of respect and appreciation for their partner’s feelings and needs. The logic is baffling, especially given that Flynn never once acted like someone who wanted to control her or restrict her freedom. He loved her for who she was and was willing to follow her wherever she wanted to go, even if it meant leaving behind his own dreams. And the series also portrays Flynn as a character who is constantly disrespected and belittled by others, especially Cassandra, while Rapunzel stands by silently. This dynamic makes their relationship feel one-sided and unfair, as Rapunzel often takes him for granted. She keeps secrets from him, allows others to disrespect him, and even goes so far as to draw his face on a punching bag to bond with Cassandra, without ever apologizing for these actions. The series also includes moments that feel deeply out of character for Rapunzel, such as using time travel to “fix” Flynn’s personality when he disagrees with her, showing no guilt or remorse afterward. These actions diminish the love and respect she showed for him in the movie, where she was willing to sacrifice everything for him.

If the series never happened, this wedding might have been my second or even first choice. And if they would have followed the original Brothers Grimm fairy tale, this would have undoubtedly been my first place because there is nothing more romantic than a couple exchanging vows, promising themselves to one another and considering themselves to be already married in spirit, despite not being able to marry legally in a church. That captures the true essence of marriage: a mutual promise to stay together and a declaration that the other person is their one and only. Unfortunately, the series delivers the opposite message. Rapunzel rejects the idea of being engaged or married, choosing an unclear idea of "freedom" over her love for Flynn. This takes away from the strong relationship they built in the movie, which was based on trust, sacrifice, and mutual support. By making marriage seem like something to fear, the series lessens the importance of the love they worked so hard to protect. Instead of showing how freedom and a loving partnership can go hand in hand—where both people grow and support each other—the series acts like independence and marriage can’t exist together. This misrepresents what a healthy relationship looks like and sends the wrong message about real commitment. Flynn’s deep love and support for Rapunzel are ignored, making him seem unimportant in their story. Marriage isn’t supposed to be a threat to freedom. It’s meant to be a partnership where both people thrive together. By failing to show this, the series misses the chance to give their story the meaningful ending it deserved. And it makes me more angry when I think about the fact, that they could have easily have them not be married already without ruining their love story if they would have just introduced the conflict that a princess and a thief would have not been allowed to marry in their time. This would have been a million times better and more romantic than having Rapunzel considering a life with him to be a prison and that would have also made the plot twist work that he was secretly a prince.

So, I’m very sorry but if I have to count this stupid series canon, then this is last place. I just wish they would have at least changed her name because she is not Rapunzel anymore. The real Rapunzel from the Brothers Grimm accepted her prince’s proposal the first time he asked and saw marriage as liberation—a chance to escape the witch’s control and find happiness with someone who truly loved her. For Disney to flip that into “marriage equals loss of freedom” is not just a strange take but also feels antithetical to the spirit of the story. Marriage in the original fairy tale was an act of rebellion against confinement, and it’s tragic that Disney turned it into something Rapunzel feared rather than embraced. What makes it even worse is that they retained the name "Rapunzel" while altering the message so drastically. It feels like a disservice to both the character and the timeless narrative she represents.

Additionally, there are glaring continuity issues. For example, why didn’t the four little girls from the movie age over three years? And why were the new characters from the series absent? The Royal Theatre in Disneyland still claims, “It wasn’t long until they got married,” which directly contradicts the series. This just makes it painfully obvious that the series was written in afterwards. If I have to accept the series as canon, my love for the original movie is ruined.

I’m sorry, but this series has turned what should have been a beautiful wedding into a deeply frustrating and disappointing one. Please respect my opinions.

[tangledmovielove]

Why Tangled Means So Much to Me, and How the Series Changed Everything

The original Tangled movie will always hold a special place in my heart. Being born in Hanau, the birthplace of the Brothers Grimm, their fairy tales were a big part of my childhood, and Rapunzel’s story was one of my favorites. In 2010, when I was 11, I discovered that Disney was making an adaptation of this beloved fairy tale. As a Disney fan, I couldn’t have been more excited.

That summer, while on holiday in Austria, I visited a fairy tale pathway with a Rapunzel tower. It became my favorite attraction, sparking even more excitement for the movie. A few days later, while watching Toy Story 3 in the cinema, I saw the Tangled trailer for the first time. Although I noticed changes to the original tale, I was still eager to see Disney’s take on the story.

When the movie came out in December 2010 in Germany, my family and I were going through a tough time. Listening to the Tangled story on CD became a source of comfort. I fell in love with the characters, especially Rapunzel and Flynn. Their bond, built on trust, sacrifice, and mutual respect, was so inspiring.

In January 2011, I got the soundtrack CD and couldn’t stop listening to “When Will My Life Begin” and “I See the Light.” When I finally watched the full movie on DVD for my 12th birthday, it left a lasting impression. No other movie had ever moved me so deeply. Rapunzel and Flynn became my favorite couple of all time, and Rapunzel herself became my favorite Disney princess along with Ariel.

Over the years, I continued to adore the movie. In 2012, I watched Tangled Ever After and thought it was the perfect ending. In 2014, I even got to meet Rapunzel at Disneyland Paris—a dream come true. Around that time, my friends started calling me "Rapunzel" because of my similar personality. The movie and its characters helped me through challenging times, especially when I had to change schools. Writing my own Tangled stories became a creative outlet.

But then, in 2017, everything changed. The Tangled series was released, and it destroyed everything I loved about the movie and my favorite couple. I had feared it might ruin things when it was announced in 2015, but I couldn’t have imagined how much.

The series sidelined Flynn, my favorite Disney male character, and introduced Cassandra, who dominated the story in a way that felt unnecessary. Worst of all was the rejection of Flynn’s marriage proposal in the very first episode. Rapunzel, who was willing to sacrifice her freedom and life for Flynn at the end of the movie, suddenly viewed marriage as a prison.

This storyline made no sense to me. If one partner rejects marriage while the other wants it, the relationship simply doesn’t work. Marriage is about mutual love and commitment, and the series seemed to dismiss this in favor of an abstract concept of "freedom."

It hurt to see Flynn constantly sidelined and mistreated, with Rapunzel keeping secrets, rejecting his proposals, and even drawing his face on a punching bag. In a healthy relationship, both partners’ wishes and feelings matter, but the series showed Flynn always giving in while Rapunzel didn’t compromise.

In 2018, while analyzing a book in school, I noticed a character who rejected marriage like Rapunzel ended up cheating on their partner. This reinforced my belief that the series’ message was flawed and unrealistic.

By 2019, I had given up on Tangled entirely. I couldn’t love a couple where one partner viewed commitment as a trap. For years, I tried to move past it, but the frustration lingered.

In 2023, I decided to revisit Tangled and remind myself why I loved it in the first place. I realized that, since it’s fictional, I don’t have to accept the series as canon. I began writing my own fanfiction to portray Rapunzel and Flynn the way I imagined them.

Reading the original Petrosinella and Brothers Grimm versions of the fairy tale helped me reconnect with the story. In these versions, Rapunzel accepted her prince’s proposal immediately, seeing marriage as a way to escape confinement and find happiness.

I’ve also started this blog to express my thoughts and turn my frustration into something creative. I’ve lost the fear of sharing my opinion, even if some fans disagree. Tangled meant so much to me for so many years, and I’m reclaiming my love for the movie and characters in my own way, even though it's still hard to find a way to still enjoy it without thinking about the series.

To me, Rapunzel and Flynn’s love story should be about mutual respect, trust, and commitment. That’s the story I’ll continue to celebrate.

[tangledmovielove]

Unpopular Opinion: Series Rapunzel Didn’t Deserve Flynn Rider (But Movie Rapunzel Did)

Look, I’m just going to say it: I love Flynn and Rapunzel in the movie. They’re my OTP, my ultimate Disney couple, my “ride-or-die” pair. I’d watch Tangled every day if I could and still tear up when Flynn says, “You were my new dream.” That relationship? Perfection. Growth, trust, love, everything I want in a couple.

But then… the series happened. And I have to ask: What happened to my Rapunzel? Suddenly, she’s making Flynn feel like a backup dancer in her story, treating him like his love and loyalty don’t matter, and—worst of all—implying that MARRIAGE to the man who literally DIED for her would be some kind of "prison"? Like, excuse me? The math isn’t mathing. 🤔

And yes, I know some people will say, “But she’s working through trauma! She’s finding herself!” Sure. I’m all for characters growing and addressing their past, but there’s a difference between exploring personal freedom and making the man who’s loved you since day three feel like a ball-and-chain. Flynn wasn’t asking her to give up her adventures—he just wanted to be part of them! 💔

What frustrates me most is how I’m apparently not allowed to criticize this version of Rapunzel without being labeled as anti-feminist or not understanding her "journey." Meanwhile, people can endlessly trash older Disney princesses like Cinderella or Ariel for chasing love, and that’s fine? So, let me get this straight: Ariel sacrificing her voice for Eric = problematic, but Rapunzel disrespecting her soulmate because she “needs space” = empowerment? 🤷‍♀️ The double standards are wild.

At the end of the day, I just want to go back to Tangled, where the love was mutual, the sacrifices made sense, and “You were my new dream” actually meant something. 😞

[tangledmovielove]

Rapunzel: I love Flynn so much that I would literally sacrifice my entire freedom and my entire life just to save him and I want to kiss him all the time.

Also Rapunzel: I don't want to marry him because that would mean giving up my freedom even though in the time period we live in that would be the only way to even get the freedom of loving each other physically and to be together in public. But I'm of course still making out with him because I still want the benefits without having to commit.

[tangledmovielove]

Rapunzel about sacrificing her entire freedom and basically her entire life for a man she met three days ago because she loved him so much and then making out with that guy in public because they were so passionate: That's perfectly fine.

Rapunzel about marrying that same man after that moment of proving true love and commitment and months of getting to know each other better in a time period where a marriage was the only way for a couple to even be together publicly and physically: No, that's a trap.