#star trek tag
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
captainsvscaptains · 11 months ago
Text
Battle of the Captains
Grand Finale
Tumblr media Tumblr media
No antipropaganda on my polls please - talk about the character you want to defend, not their adversary
2K notes · View notes
cherrraty · 3 months ago
Text
someone has DEFINITELY said this before and ive seen the post but this scene is so incredibly gay im actually throwing up and yelling angry obscenities
68 notes · View notes
luminiera-merge · 1 year ago
Text
the more star trek voyager the more i realise these fuckers have repeatedly changed the timeline and profoundly affected the federation and by extension the entire galaxy just to make sure they stay in one piece and get home faster. janeway's done it. harry kim's done it. chakotay's done it. the doctor's done it. seven of nine's done it. tom paris and b'elanna are innocent, surprisingly. but my point here is that maybe voyager is meant to have gotten lost and then exploded in the delta quadrant
208 notes · View notes
gnuttormen · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Happy New Year!
Three years ago I did a similar painting to this, and I felt a need to make another. I'm also trying to get comfortable in my own digital style I had a couple of years ago and this was a perfect warmup.
May 2024 bring you all lots of Spones!
__________________ My art tag  |  Social Media  |  Youtube
38 notes · View notes
windcalling · 18 days ago
Text
kim dokja 🤝 spock
“a woman” -> you mean your mom? your human mother? that woman?
6 notes · View notes
ordinarymaine · 19 days ago
Text
thinking about when they brought ro back in picard and then 5 minutes later she suicide bombed her ship
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
beauxjangles · 1 year ago
Text
hey have I mentioned that star trek- fuck I meant star trek- I mean star trek- shit fuck balls star trek- I meant to say star trek- shit I mean st
21 notes · View notes
sinchronicity · 1 year ago
Text
it truly does annoy me that strange new worlds is so constantly heterosexual, but i never see anyone else bitching about it so im just like....[sits in homosexual judgemental silence]
12 notes · View notes
Note
Can you explain star trek for me?
Yes, I can.
OK, this is kind of a ridiculous idea -- I hope you will be patient with me as I say some things.
The Star Trek universe, as we know it, starts out in 2374. It has been going on for over a hundred years (about as long as Shakespeare lived). At the end of this first phase of the Star Trek universe, there was a war. In this first phase, known as "the Great Link," the future was linked in a singularity into a "superbeing" called the One, who is, among other things, a massive and extremely powerful "artificial intelligence" built in space around the sun, which can communicate with all the other pieces of the future (which are, in fact, starships), and which is a single entity whose individual components have all their knowledge and all their memories. The superbeing has become bored with its creation, and has begun to "dissolve" and reintegrate itself.
(I need to remind you here that the word "dissolve" was chosen by fans of the series because it sounds cool; it is actually just an ordinary word that means "break apart.")
The dissolving superbeing, of course, will eventually reintegrate into its individual components, which will each have to create their own singularity. (If this process were allowed to continue, it would eventually reach a point where the entire universe was in some way a part of the One.)
The One is not "supernatural" in the way that Christian God is "supernatural," although there may be supernatural elements involved. It is not "supernatural" in the sense that some of the episodes of The Original Series were "in reality," as they say, "inspired by supernatural happenings and events." It is, on the one hand, all-powerful and all-knowing (the One is the "knowledge base" of all the parts of the future, remember), but, on the other hand, its knowledge base is a thing which "evolves" in real time: the One "knows" what it "knows" only insofar as it "knows" that what it "knows" will later, in time, become what it "knows" -- it is an "emergent" system of knowledge, in a way.
This is one way to make Star Trek (some of its most well-known characters and episodes are still just a little bit "in the real world" and not just completely SF) and one reason why people like it. But this is a "hard" SF universe in the sense that a lot of the plot depends on the One's knowledge evolving to become more "real" than before.
For instance, the first "superbeing" of Star Trek, which I believe was actually called the "Gods," was the result of a "reincarnation" of the One. The "Gods" made a conscious choice to "dissolve" -- or more correctly, split apart -- as individuals, in order to "recombine" to become the Gods. This is important: the dissolving of the One is supposed to be very dangerous, and there is, of course, a reason why dissolving is dangerous: the One's whole purpose is to prevent the reintegration of its components into individuals. The "superbeing" that we eventually got is actually a sort of self-destruct mechanism the One has built to limit its reintegration. The superbeing, having once been the One, is now aware that it is the One -- and if it doesn't stop the reintegration (by destroying the One through the mechanism of the superbeing's reintegration), then the One will "dissolve" and reintegrate to make a new, smaller One. This new, smaller One will in turn want to dissolve in a new One, and so on, forever.
So the choice to dissociate was, in a way, a choice to commit suicide: the superbeing knew that by "dissolving" it would leave the One free to reintegrate.
Now, there were certain problems with this: the One's superbeing-sona was also supposed to be "dissolved," which resulted in a certain amount of confusion. How would the One reintegrate into something called "Kirk" if "Kirk" was just a copy, not the true self of the One? You see what I mean, right? The story's conclusion was that the One had a son, whom people called "Jim Kirk," who was the "true" person of the One who, instead of being the superbeing-sona "Kirk," is just the One as we recognize it in our own universe.
OK. OK.
In Star Trek, there is a famous "galactic federation" which is our "real" universe's equivalent of "Star Trek" and not "Star Wars," and one of the things it does is to try to fight against the One's attempts to "dissolve." There is a famous "superweapon" which the federation uses to fight the One's attempts, and it consists of two parts -- an "emitter" that sends out a beam which makes the One disintegrate, and a "beacon" which keeps track of when the One is disintegrated, so that it can't reintegrate. The federation has this "superweapon" because it understands that if the One ever does become "unimaginably powerful," it could, in fact, overwhelm the federation by reintegrating itself and "dissolving" the federation, the one obstacle it has left to its ultimate victory.
The One cannot reintegrate itself without making its universe dissolve -- but the One can bring about this situation when it "dissolves" -- by sending some of its parts to "dissolve" in the future. The One is trying very hard to "dissolve" or "dissociate" itself into its individual parts, but this is not an easy task, because there's a sort of feedback involved: the One wants to stay unified, but its future self will be less unified unless it allows it to reintegrate.
The idea is that the federation is actually a "rebellion" against the one: the federation tries to fight the One by limiting its ability to reintegrate. If the federation could somehow make the One unable to reintegrate at all, then the One would just dissolve, and its "dissociation" (which in a certain sense is what the Star Trek universe is all about) would come to an end -- except that, since the One cannot really dissolve, its reintegration can never really happen and the One will just be waiting for its next chance to "dissolve" itself instead of reintegrating.
(For this reason, the One's "dissociation" is actually called its "deconstruction" and is not just a normal word that means something else, as a "dissolve" is a "dissolution" is a dissolution is a dissolve is a...
6 notes · View notes
angorwhosebabyisthis · 8 months ago
Text
i feel like it's also worth adding that these grown ass women with jobs and families risked losing those things and going to jail for the crime of creating, sharing, and engaging with gay fiction. read that again. read it a third time.
a huge factor in the boom of positive, well-written queer representation we've had in the last decade or so is that creators who grew up in and were influenced by fandom have aged into positions to push for it in the professional creative sphere. audiences who grew up in fandom aged into the group where they could contribute money to those projects, now that the door was finally open; audiences who were already in that bracket, and had been desperate for decades for decent queer rep to put support behind, jumped at the chance. people like to brush it off as ~not that deep~ and act like it's ~terminally online~ and ~cringe~ to pretend fandom--let alone shipping specifically--has any kind of meaningful influence. but it has had a powerful, demonstrable positive impact going back more than half a century, and none of that would have been possible if the infrastructure of modern fandom hadn't already been made.
women who put everything on the line--put in money and blood and sweat and tears and fear for their entire goddamn lives--to build our spaces in secret have done a hell of the fuck a lot more for the representation of queer love in fiction than any of you shitheads whining about how fandom is too shipping-focused, how these hags belong in the kitchen should be doing their taxes and raising their children instead of '''invading fandom spaces.''' these women did genuine actual fucking grassroots activism against systemic oppression so you, the assholes in the audience, could sit on your ass and reap the benefits while you actively contribute to the resurgence of that systemic oppression, no less.
do your research, put your money where your mouth is to contribute a tenth of what these women did for society, or shut the fuck up.
I know "60s housewives who invented slash fanfiction" has taken on a life of its own as a phrase, but Kirk/Spock didn't really exist until the 70s and THOSE WOMEN HAD JOBS. They were teachers and librarians and bookkeepers and scientists and they damn well spent their own money going to conventions, printing zines, buying fanart and making fandom happen. Put some respect on their names.
85K notes · View notes
captainsvscaptains · 1 year ago
Text
Battle of the Captains
Final A
Tumblr media Tumblr media
No antipropaganda on my polls please
Good luck to the Trekkies
1K notes · View notes
cherrraty · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
i cant do this i cant handle this fukcing animal i literally cry every time its on screen please help me
76 notes · View notes
luminiera-merge · 3 months ago
Text
the star trek discovery episode with harry mudd (magic to make the sanest man go mad) was an amazing episode but god it kinda recontextualises harry mudd in a really funny way if you think about it. like in the original series he's kinda just a notorious scammer, and yet in discovery he does. all that.
so if you've seen discovery and you move onto tos it's so fucking funny bc it's like aw look at this lovable little rogue! :D isn't he so sneaky :D (his kill count is somewhere in the thousands)
2 notes · View notes
gnuttormen · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Merry Christmas! ❤️
And have a happy lovely holiday
__________________ My art tag  |  Social Media  |  Youtube
38 notes · View notes
ribombeee · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
25K notes · View notes
ordinarymaine · 19 days ago
Text
seeing people tag that with kiradax and agreeing with it As a kiradax enjoyer
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes