#rdna 3

[omisomiso-pcinfo]

AMD Radeon RX 7000 シリーズのとあるネタからAMDのデスクトップ向けGPUを整理したい。その②（著者振り返り確認作業）

古くからのAMDファンには馴染み深い（？）であろう「BulldozerアーキテクチャCPU」を引き合いにしたRadeonに関する記事を紹介します。

[govindhtech]

Tech Showdown: RX 6800 XT Dominates, RDNA 2 Fine on Linux!

Linux activity like RX 6800 XT is Faster Than RX 7800 XT and RDNA 2 Improves with Age Like Vintage Wine

Among the most remarkable motherboards now available comprises the Amd RX 7800 XT. In Microsoft Windows, for now, this GPU provides a modest gain in performance over the Geforce RX 6800 XT. They are now provided with proof, according of Phoronix, showing that the Radeon RX 6800 XT plays far better in Windows 1080p (1920 x 1080) gaming than the Radeon RX 7800 XT achieves at the same resolution.

Those Amd RX 6800 XT was the clear leader above all of the additional video cards manufactured by AMD, Nvidia, which and Intel. The graphics card performance of the previous-generation Geforce RX 6800 XT was as much as 12 percent better than that of the current-generation Geforce RX 7800 XT. The performance of the older model was approximately comparable to that of the Radeon RX 6800.

In justification of RDNA 2, the Geforce RX 6000 series have existed on the marketplace for an extended period now, whose implies they operate on motorists that have been took to a greater extent than that of the Radeon RX 7000 series, which doesn’t seem more than twelve months old yet.

If you compare the two graphics cards based on their basic specs, you’ll see that the Radeon RX 7800 XT has 12 less compute units than its predecessor, the Radeon RX 6800 XT. On paper, the former exhibits around eighty percent more FP32 performance than the later does. The increased clock rates of the Radeon RX 7800 XT aren’t sufficient to make up for the lack of performance in other areas.

Because of the RDNA 3 design, AMD is able to double-pump the compute units, which, in theory, delivers twice the performance. This is made possible by the fact that the RDNA 3 architecture. The workload, and more significantly, the driver, is the most critical factor in determining the final outcome since it instructs the graphics card when it is possible to carry out such an operation.

During this time, the Radeon graphics cards were at the top of the Linux gaming rankings. They were followed by Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 30 series (Ampere), while Intel’s Arc Alchemist was in the last position. The GeForce RTX 3080 was the strongest performance from Nvidia, but it was still outperformed by the Radeon RX 6700 XT. It is interesting to note that the performance difference between the Arc A580 and the Arc A750 was just 8%. In the meanwhile, the performance of the Arc A770 was shown to be 13% superior than that of the Arc A580.

Workstation workloads were another area in which AMD’s RDNA 2-powered graphics cards thrived, demonstrating that the company’s superiority was not limited to the gaming industry. In SPECViewPerf 2020 3.0, the Radeon RX 6800 XT showed between 14% and 87% greater OpenGL performance than the Radeon RX 7800 XT. This was determined by comparing the two GPUs. The Radeon RX 7800 XT was eventually victorious in the ParaView 5.10.1 benchmark, achieving 5% higher performance than the Radeon RX 6800 XT.

In the Linux environment, RDNA 3 hasn’t lived up to its promise, and it’s unclear whether or not performance will improve with updated drivers. While we wait for RDNA 3 to reach its full potential, gaming on Linux is handled quite well by RDNA 2, in the interim. If you’re a Linux gamer who plays at 1080p, there isn’t much of a reason to upgrade to RDNA 3 right now. Perhaps price will be more reasonable by the time RDNA 3 reaches its maximum potential, but for the time being, there isn’t much of a reason to upgrade.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[goodguygadgets]

Level up your handheld gaming experiences with the Lenovo Legion Go

Gaming on the Go! Get ahead of the competition and game like never before. Experience powerful gaming even while on the move with the Lenovo Legion Go. #LenovoPhilippines #LenovoLegionGo #gaming

In today’s fast-paced and ever-moving world, sneaking in a couple of hours or even minutes of uninterrupted gameplay can be difficult. Be it diving into a cozy game like Stardew Valley or Coral Island to unwind after a day of work or striving to reach a new rank in Valorant, it requires some time and effort to get into that ideal gaming zone. While time cannot be stopped, Lenovo has found a way…

[techdriveplay]

GIGABYTE Launches GIGABYTE AMD Radeon™ RX 7900 GRE GAMING OC 16G Graphics Cards

Feb 26, 2024 – GIGABYTE TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd, a leading manufacturer of premium gaming hardware, today announced the new GIGABYTE AMD Radeon™ RX 7900 GRE graphics cards powered by AMD RDNA™ 3 architecture – the GIGABYTE Radeon RX 7900 GRE GAMING OC 16G graphics cards available for purchase on February 27, 2024. The GAMING OC graphics card, a classic and popular GIGABYTE graphics card, focuses on…

[science-sculpt]

A snip, a splice : Power of rDNA Technology

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the blueprint of life, holds the secrets to the intricate workings of every living organism. But what if we could manipulate this blueprint, adding, removing, or tweaking its code? This revolutionary concept forms the core of recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology, a powerful tool that has transformed biology and medicine.

The story starts in the early 1970s with two brilliant scientists; Stanley Cohen at Stanford University and Herbert Boyer at the University of California, San Francisco. Cohen, a microbiologist, had been studying plasmids – small circular DNA molecules found in bacteria. Boyer, a biochemist, was an expert on restriction enzymes – molecular scissors that could cut DNA at specific sequences. Their collaboration proved groundbreaking. They envisioned combining these tools to create the first ever recombinant DNA molecule. Cohen provided the plasmids, which would act as vectors to carry foreign DNA into host cells. Boyer, on the other hand, used restriction enzymes to cut both the plasmid and the desired foreign DNA, allowing them to be pieced together. Through meticulous experimentation, they successfully created the first recombinant DNA molecule, forever altering the course of biology.

Cohen and Boyer's work wouldn't have been possible without the earlier discoveries of restriction enzymes. These "molecular scissors" were independently identified by three separate research groups in the 1960s. Werner Arber in Switzerland, along with Hamilton Smith and Daniel Nathans in the US, unraveled the role of restriction enzymes in bacterial defense mechanisms. These enzymes helped bacteria defend against invading viruses by cutting up their foreign DNA. Recognizing the potential of these "genetic scalpels," the groundwork was laid for their application in rDNA technology.

Here's a simplified breakdown of the rDNA process:

Isolation of DNA: The journey starts with isolating DNA from a donor organism.

Cleavage with Restriction Enzymes: Specific enzymes cut the DNA at defined sequences.

Selection of Vector: A carrier molecule (often a plasmid) is chosen to transport the recombinant DNA.

Ligation: The DNA fragments and vector are stitched together using DNA ligase, an enzyme.

Transformation: The recombinant DNA enters a host cell (usually bacteria or yeast).

Selection and Expression: The transformed cells are selected, and the gene of interest is expressed, leading to the desired protein production.

Since its inception, rDNA technology has played a pivotal role in several groundbreaking advancements. Let's take a whirlwind tour through some of the most significant moments in R-DNA history:

1978: Birth of Insulin on the Factory Floor: Scientists achieved a feat of genetic engineering by using R-DNA to produce human insulin in bacteria. This marked a turning point for diabetics, offering a readily available and more consistent source of this life-saving hormone.

1980s: Gene Wars and the Rise of GMOs: The 1980s saw the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Plants were engineered with genes for insect resistance or herbicide tolerance, sparking debates about the safety and ethics of this technology. R-DNA research continues to be at the forefront of discussions regarding genetically modified foods.

1990s: The Human Genome Project Sets Sail: This ambitious international project aimed to sequence the entire human genome. R-DNA techniques played a crucial role in deciphering the 3 billion letters of our genetic code, opening doors for personalized medicine and a deeper understanding of human health and disease.

2000s: Gene Therapy Takes Center Stage: The first successful gene therapy trials for inherited diseases like severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) took place. R-DNA technology offered a glimmer of hope for treating genetic disorders by introducing healthy genes to replace defective ones.

2010s and Beyond: CRISPR Takes Over: The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene editing tool based on R-DNA principles, has ushered in a new era of genetic manipulation. With unprecedented precision, scientists can now edit genes in various organisms, holding immense potential for gene therapy, crop improvement, and even the eradication of diseases.

But with great power comes great responsibility, and R-DNA raises a host of ethical concerns.Tinkering with the building blocks of life carries the risk of unintended consequences. Engineered genes could escape and disrupt ecosystems, or modified organisms could have unforeseen health effects. The ability to edit human genes opens the door to designer babies, raising questions about social equity and the potential misuse of the technology for eugenics.

Who Controls the Tools? Access to R-DNA technology could be restricted to wealthy nations or corporations, exacerbating existing inequalities. Biosecurity is also a concern, as the technology could be misused for bioterrorism. Creating entirely new organisms forces us to confront what it means to be "natural." Should we modify plants and animals for human benefit, or preserve their original forms? R-DNA technology is a powerful tool, and we must have open discussions about its ethical implications. Scientists, policymakers, and the public all need to be involved in shaping the future of this technology. As we move forward, open dialogue and collaboration between scientists, policymakers, and the public are crucial to ensure the safe and ethical application of this powerful technology.

The journey of rDNA technology is a testament to human ingenuity and its potential to reshape our world. From decoding the secrets of life to creating solutions for healthcare, agriculture, and beyond, rDNA technology continues to evolve, promising a future filled with exciting possibilities.

[minnesotadruids]

The Order of Bradán Feasa (OBF)

Unit One of an RDNA Druid training program is finally in its first draft! I started writing this in 2020, and wrote a majority of it (114 pages) that year because I wanted to have created something before the feared perception of probably contracting Covid and dying therefrom. Then once I was vaccinated, I got complacent and set the draft aside, coming back to it perhaps once a month, re-reading and revising, not really adding any new content.

In an attempt to push forward with my list of proposed topics, I started to realize I was not qualified to create content for many of them, and that I needed to do a lot more reading and learning for my own sake before continuing. Thus 2021, 2022, and much of 2023 were dedicated to reading my stack of purchased but unread books, annotating, highlighting, and cross-referencing for veracity.

I still have a lot of reading and learning ahead of me, but much of that will align with Unit Three, which hasn't been started yet. Unit Two has actually been in a draft form since 2017, and there will be an exam to go with it. This will probably be the first modern Druid training program with an exam, and it will require a 90% score or higher to pass.

What is the OBF?

The Order of Bradán Feasa is a non-clerical side order made for the Reformed Druids of North America. The name means the "Salmon of Knowledge" in Irish Gaelic, and is a reference to the myth of Finn McCool gaining all the world's knowledge when he burns himself while cooking the salmon. Any person who completes Units One and Two will be inducted to OBF and given a digital certificate indicating completion of said training program. Units One and Two would be considered sufficient training for in-person candidates to be invited to Second Order initiation in the RDNA. The optional Unit Three is the RDNA Clergy Prep Course and Grove Governance Guide (GGG), and would be considered prerequisite to ordination to the Third Order: the RDNA priesthood, in addition to existing customary requirements such as the supervised All-Night Vigil.

Completing the First Draft

While some people write novels during November for N.A.N.O.M.I.R.O. or whatever, I was suddenly inspired to get Unit One done. Over the month of November I wrote 55 new pages and revised existing content again. No, that's no novel, but writing something of (hopefully) academic quality with APA citations is a bit more meticulous, especially with this being my first "college level" type of project in about 16 years.

Members of Oakdale Grove are in the process of reviewing and annotating the first draft already. I find it easier to spot needed revisions or typos when something is in print, plus I love writing directly on drafts with an ink pen because I'm an older millennial (roars in dinosaur, lol). And I get to review and mark it up for editing with a bit of a Dark Academia aesthetic. I'm a bit shocked that Unit 1 is 169 pages, and likely to grow. We've already identified some sections that don't exist yet that need to be here. Unit 2 is much smaller. I expect Unit 3 to be smaller, as well.

The goal is for Unit 1 to go live before Beltane 2024, for Unit 2 to go live by the Autumnal Equinox of 2024, and for Unit 3 to go live by the end of 2024. That last one has the greatest uncertainty though, because I still have two important books to read, and possibly more that I haven't found yet.

See also: OBF Program Syllabus

[issonaoeumblogr]

Qual é o melhor console: Playstation ou XboX?

Essa é uma das maiores perguntas do mundo gamer. E para ajudar você a escolher o seu lado, trouxemos alguns pontos positivos dos dois. Veja só!

As 3 qualidades mais notáveis do Xbox séries X:

1° 4K UHD: O console proporciona uma visão mais ampla de jogos como Forza Horizon ou Zelda. Os gráficos ficam mais limpos e a qualidade fica muito maior com o FPS que abaixa a cada lançamento de jogos. ( *É esse o sentido da última frase? Fps pra mim é protetor solar*)

2° Duas pilhas AA.

Os controles utilizam duas pilhas AA. O que ajuda totalmente nas horas de jogo em tempo de durabilidade demorando de 3 à 4 horas para a próxima recarga.

3° Configuração.

O console tem um disco rígido SSD com 16GB de RAM, um processador de 8 núcleos com 3,8 GHz de potência e uma GPU personalizada de 12 TFLOPS RDNA 2. Resumindo, roda todos os jogos com até 1TB de memória com resolução 4k.

Agora fique com 3 qualidades notáveis do Playstation, que não estão no XBOX.

1° Controle DualSense.

Isso representa mais sensibilidade ao seu controle, possibilitando sentir movimentos do jogo como pulos ou rastejos, que fazem o controle vibrar em sincronia com o jogo.

2° Microfones no controle.

A Playstation foi revolucionária inserindo mini microfones nos seus controles, fazendo seus jogos online mais práticos dispensando o uso de fones com microfones para comunicação.

3° Design gráfico impecável.

A Playstation é a empresa que mais cuida de seu design gráfico, então se você gosta de um jogo com a tela limpa, sem momentos chatos como travar no meio da partida, o PlayStation é sua melhor escolha.

Weverton Rafael e Vynicius Arantes

[sillythoughtsaboutstupidthings]

GPU Industry Rant

I'm angry, angry about graphics cards.

Why?

Because what used to be a fun exercise in trying to find the best value or trying to find a good deal at a shoestring budget has turned into "how long do I need to wait to find something that isn't awful value".

It used to be that you could get a reasonably decent new gaming GPU for about $100-$150 and every new generation there'd be new cards in that price range that were a decent bit better. You used to be able to get a genuinely good gaming GPU at $150-250 with significant improvements every generation.

What used to be

It has soon been 4 years since the release of the GTX 1650, and about 3.5 years since the 1660 Super and 1650 Super. These three cards represent the last time there was a step forward at these two price points.

In 2016 we had the GTX 1050ti at $150, the RX 470 at $180 and the RX 480 at $200 ($250 for the 8GB model). The 1050ti was pretty awful value compared to the 25% faster RX 470, but it still beat previous generation $200 cards by a few percent. The GTX 1650 then at $150 just about matched the RX 470 in 2019, still not a great value improvement, especially since AMD released the slightly faster RX 570 at $170 in 2017, but at least you paid slightly less for about a match in performance. The GTX 1650 Super half a year later was about similar, matching or slightly beating the RX 580 (which in turn was a bit faster than the 480 and slightly cheaper) at $160, making for a small step up in performance compared to the RX 570. The 1660 Super at around the same time set you back $230 while providing about 25% more performance than a 1650 Super or RX 580, making it on par with 2016′s $450 GTX 1070, quite an improvement in value.

As for cards below $150, we've had nothing since the GT 1030 ($70 2017), RX 550 ($80 2017) RX 560 ($100 2017) and GTX 1050 ($110 2016).

Since then we've had

the GTX 1630, a card that costs $150 while performing somewhere between a 1050 and 1050ti, making it uncompetitive against the bad value 1050ti from 2016. The only way to make the 1630 look good is if you compared it to the 950 from 2015. The RX 6400, $160 for a card that gets beaten by the 1650 by a slight margin while also having issues in older PCs due to limited x4 PCI-E bandwidth. The RX 6500XT a $200 card that gets handily beaten by the 1650 Super with the same PCI-E issue as the 6400. The RTX 3050 a $250 (in theory at least) card that very slightly beats the 1660 Super. You're pretty much paying at least $20 more for unusable raytracing and the privilege of being able to use DLSS.

Cope

Some youtubers a while back went on about how "the age of the APU" is coming or something like that. Arguing that anything up to about $150 will be made obsolete by integrated graphics. They were technically correct, but only if you compare the latest and greatest iGPU in laptop CPUs, the Radeon 680M to the GTX 1630, which as I mentioned earlier is worse than a 1050ti, a $150 GPU that's coming up on its 7th birthday in a few months. Presumably the same 680M and possibly a 12CU RDNA 3 GPU will make it into some Ryzen 7000G APUs later this year, but even then I think top iGPU (which will be included in a CPU that'll be more expensive that it would've been to buy a cheap CPU + GPU combo back in the day) only might match RX 6400 performance or maybe 1650 performance, certainly not 1650 Super performance and absolutely not what ought to have been $150 performance this generation (which is to say something closer to the RTX 3050).

Hope

At least the used market is back to relatively normal, so if you want RX 6500XT performance but don't feel like paying $200 for it you can just buy a used RX 580 for like $90 or if you want better you can go for a 1660 Super for about $130 (both "buy it now" prices on ebay). The prices of these used cards are scaled quite appropriately from what new card pricing for the same performance levels ought to be.

The downside of buying older cards is that they don't always age that well. The GTX 9 and 10-series have aged like fine milk in the latest games (which is to say that relative performance to the 20 and 16-series is down by a lot) and AMD dropped support for their 2012-2015 lineup in 2021.

Additional notes

It is worth mentioning that the RX 6600 is currently available at $250 in the US when on a small discount and provides a good 25% performance uplift compared to the RTX 3050/GTX 1660 Super, however this pricing is not universal, the same card on German amazon is €280 or $300, on canadian amazon the best I found was 270 USD. Here in Sweden some part of increased prices is definitely due to inflation, 1660 Supers used to be around 2700 SEK, now an RX 6600 is at best 3200 SEK which is a pretty big change, sure it currently translates to just below $250 before our 25% sales tax, but that doesn't make it feel any better.

[constance-mcentee]

IMAGE DESCRIPTION: A screen capture of the Wikipedia article about Marine Fungi reads as follows:

Many species of marine fungi are known only from spores and it is likely a large number of species have yet to be discovered.[3] In fact, it is thought that less than 1% of all marine fungal species have been described, due to difficulty in targeting marine fungal DNA and difficulties that arise in attempting to grow cultures of marine fungi.[4] It is impracticable to culture many of these fungi, but their nature can be investigated by examining seawater samples and undertaking rDNA analysis of the fungal material found.[3]

think about this now.

[easyshoppi-blog]

AMD vs. NVIDIA: Which is Better for High-End Gaming?

When it comes to high-end gaming, AMD and NVIDIA are the two dominant players in the graphics card market. Both companies offer powerful GPUs capable of delivering stunning visuals, high frame rates, and cutting-edge features. However, choosing between the two often boils down to specific needs, budget, and personal preferences. Let’s break down the key factors to determine which brand is better for high-end gaming.

Performance

NVIDIA has traditionally been known for dominating the high-performance GPU segment, especially with its RTX 4080 and 4090 series. These cards offer unparalleled raw performance, excelling at 4K gaming with ultra settings and ray tracing enabled. NVIDIA’s DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) technology further boosts performance by using AI to render lower-resolution images and upscale them, making demanding titles run smoothly without sacrificing visual fidelity.

AMD, however, has significantly closed the gap in recent years with its Radeon RX 7000 series, such as the RX 7900 XTX. These GPUs also handle 4K gaming admirably and often rival NVIDIA’s offerings in raw rasterization performance. AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) technology competes with DLSS, although it typically doesn’t match the same level of quality and efficiency, particularly in older iterations.

Ray Tracing

Ray tracing, a feature that enhances realism by simulating light behavior, is where NVIDIA holds a strong advantage. NVIDIA GPUs consistently outperform AMD in ray tracing benchmarks, thanks to dedicated RT cores and superior optimization. Games with heavy ray tracing effects run noticeably smoother on NVIDIA hardware, making it a better choice for gamers prioritizing this feature.

AMD, while improving its ray tracing capabilities with each generation, still lags behind NVIDIA in both performance and efficiency in ray-traced environments. For gamers who value traditional rasterized graphics over ray tracing, AMD remains competitive, often offering better price-to-performance ratios.

Price and Value

AMD is generally more competitive in terms of pricing. Its high-end GPUs, such as the RX 7900 XTX, often undercut NVIDIA counterparts like the RTX 4080, offering similar raster performance for a lower cost. This makes AMD an attractive option for budget-conscious gamers looking for high-end performance.

NVIDIA, on the other hand, tends to command a premium price, particularly for its flagship models. While this cost is justified by advanced features like DLSS 3, ray tracing superiority, and better overall ecosystem integration, it may not always provide the best value for gamers focused solely on raw performance.

Driver Support and Software

NVIDIA has a reputation for more polished drivers and software. Features like GeForce Experience offer a streamlined user interface, automatic game optimization, and convenient tools for capturing gameplay. NVIDIA also provides Studio drivers optimized for content creators.

AMD’s Adrenalin software suite has improved significantly, offering robust customization options and solid performance tuning tools. However, AMD’s drivers have historically been more prone to issues, which can impact the gaming experience, particularly on launch-day titles.

Power Efficiency and Heat

NVIDIA GPUs are generally more power-efficient than their AMD counterparts, especially at the high end. This results in lower heat output and quieter operation, which can be critical for gamers building compact or silent systems. AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture has made strides in efficiency, but NVIDIA still holds the edge in this category.

Conclusion

For high-end gaming, the choice between AMD and NVIDIA depends on your priorities. NVIDIA leads in ray tracing, AI-driven features, and software ecosystem, making it ideal for gamers seeking cutting-edge technology. AMD, on the other hand, delivers exceptional raster performance at a lower cost, offering better value for those focused on traditional gaming metrics. Ultimately, both brands offer excellent options, and the "better" choice will depend on your gaming preferences, budget, and desired features.

[videoddd]

AMD seeks input from users for ROCm GPU support list — RX 6000 RDNA 2 GPUs most highly requested

An engineer from AMD, which is acquiring Nod.ai, posted a review on AMD’s ROCm support page on GitHub asking for advice on additional GPU support that the ROCm community would like to add to AMD’s list of supported ROCm devices. The engineer compiled a survey consisting of various GPU lines and their associated architectures: RX 7000 series (RDNA 3), RX 6000 series (RDNA 2), Phoenix mobile APUs…

[govindhtech]

AMD RDNA 3 vs. Intel Arc iGPUs : Gaming supremacy

When compared to AMD RDNA 3, Intel Arc iGPUs on Meteor Lake CPUs

Since AMD began providing its APUs with powerful integrated graphics, Intel’s advantage in the iGPU market has steadily decreased. AMD’s hold on the market was solidified at the time by the Vega iGPU family, but with RDNA, the red team opened up a whole new range of products that offered small PCs and handhelds with top-notch graphics performance. As for Intel’s Iris Xe solutions, its graphics performance was lacking and will now be greatly improved with the release of the Intel Arc iGPUs in the Core Ultra line. To provide competitive gaming performance.

Under the code name “Xe-LPG,” three different Arc Alchemist iGPU configurations are installed in Intel Core Ultra “Meteor Lake” CPUs.

There are three different configurations available: eight, seven, and four cores. When utilizing faster memory, like LPDDR5X, the GPUs can overclock to 2350 MHz (Core Ultra 9 185H) and provide a significant boost in performance. Along with other things, these GPUs support AV1, XeSS (DP4a), and DX12 Ultimate.

All things considered, these Intel Arc iGPUs are a crucial part of Chipzilla’s most recent CPUs. Since They have already seen synthetic benchmarks for the Intel Arc iGPU, today’s news focuses exclusively on gaming benchmarks. Golden Pig Upgrade (Bilibili) carried out the tests, which comprised testing a variety of games at both high and low settings and 1080p resolution.

The highest configurations of the AMD RDNA 3 and Intel Arc iGPUs seem to be quite competitive with each other, winning an identical amount of games at low 1080p resolution.

The Arc iGPU of the Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms in 7 out of 8 games evaluated in the 1080p High testing. Even yet, the RDNA 3 graphics solution trails behind the Core Ultra 5 125H. Additionally, the analysis demonstrates that the Meteor Lake CPUs are now nearly as fast as the discrete GTX 1650 Max-Q GPUs and far quicker than NVIDIA’s MX solutions.

Because of the 100 MHz clock speed differential, the Core Ultra 9 185H’s iGP clearly performs better than the Core Ultra 7 155H. The LPDDR5X-7467 memory is used in the results, which explains why the RDNA 3 GPUs do not scale as well as the faster Meteor Lake Arc iGPUs.

Although having quicker RAM is usually desired, it should be remembered that these computers are always more expensive. The Meteor Lake laptops are priced in a very expensive sector based on their prior prices. Consequently, it is important to recognize that AMD has a price edge with its Ryzen 7040/8040 range of laptops. The power efficiency performance data is the last one. It demonstrates that while AMD is superior at lower TDPs below 25W, Core Ultra 100H CPUs outperform AMD Ryzen 7040 “Phoenix” CPUs in the graphics domain at 28W TDPs.

With TDP ratings of 9–15W, Intel also offers the more power-efficient Core Ultra 100U processors, which would be a better option for entry-level and mobile gadgets that are anticipated to enter the market in the upcoming months.

The Intel Core Ultra Arc iGPU outperforms AMD’s RDNA 3 iGPUs in gaming, according to tests published by a number of tech sites. Tests conducted by Dave2D, HardwareCanucks, and Jarrod’s Tech all demonstrate competitive placement versus AMD’s RDNA 3 GPUs and considerable performance increases over prior generation Iris/UHD GPU systems. These figures also provide insight into AMD’s possible decision to maintain the same specifications and clock rates in its RDNA 3 GPUs for the Ryzen 8040 “Hawk Point” update.

AMD can likely provide a performance bump in places where they are not as strong as they could be, or when the Intel Arc iGPUs is only marginally faster, via driver upgrades. Although Intel has also issued a new driver, should anticipate more advancements on the driver front from both sides as competition in the Intel Arc iGPUs market is expected to resume.

This will be particularly important for the next generation of gaming handhelds that utilize these Intel Arc iGPUs solutions, which are built on the AMD RDNA 3 and Intel Arc architectures. When tiny PCs are released, it will be fascinating to observe the full potential of Intel Arc iGPUs, as these chips can scale up to 115W (Core Ultra 9 185H) and have unlimited access to greater power, which can result in notable performance boosts and excellent overclocking capabilities. The Core Ultra iGPU department has more enhancements in store as additional devices and solutions become available, so these performance figures are only a taste of what’s to come.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[pgdadrian]

¿PC o PS5?

 La eterna pregunta para muchos entusiastas de los videojuegos: ¿es mejor comprar una PS5 o un PC en 2025? Aunque la tecnología ha avanzado a pasos agigantados, la decisión entre estas dos opciones sigue siendo compleja, ya que cada una tiene sus ventajas y desventajas dependiendo del tipo de jugador que seas, tu presupuesto y tus expectativas.

La PS5: Consola de nueva generación al alcance de todos

La PlayStation 5, lanzada en 2020, sigue siendo una opción sólida en 2025. Con un diseño elegante y un rendimiento impresionante, la PS5 ha sido una de las consolas más exitosas de la historia. Algunos de sus puntos fuertes incluyen:

1. Experiencia de juego optimizada: La PS5 está diseñada específicamente para videojuegos, lo que significa que la experiencia de usuario está enfocada en la simplicidad y la optimización. Los juegos en esta consola se ejecutan de manera fluida, gracias a su potente hardware (un procesador AMD Ryzen Zen 2 y una GPU RDNA 2 personalizada). La velocidad de carga es casi instantánea, gracias al SSD ultrarrápido, y la retroalimentación háptica del mando DualSense agrega una capa adicional de inmersión en los títulos compatibles.

2. Exclusivas de Sony: Las exclusivas de PlayStation, como Demon’s Souls, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart y Horizon Forbidden West, siguen siendo un gran atractivo para los jugadores. Si eres fanático de estos juegos, la PS5 es tu puerta de entrada a títulos que no encontrarás en PC ni en otras consolas.

3. Facilidad de uso y compatibilidad: A diferencia de un PC, que puede requerir ajustes y configuraciones de hardware, la PS5 es una consola lista para usar. Con solo conectarla, puedes empezar a jugar sin preocuparte por actualizaciones de drivers o configuraciones complicadas. Además, el catálogo de juegos en la PlayStation Store es vasto y accesible.

4. Precio accesible: En comparación con un PC de gama media o alta, la PS5 ofrece una relación calidad-precio bastante buena. Si quieres jugar los títulos más recientes en 4K y 60 FPS sin complicaciones, la PS5 lo hace posible por un costo relativamente bajo.

El PC: Flexibilidad, personalización y potencia de sobra

Por otro lado, el PC sigue siendo la opción favorita para muchos jugadores serios que buscan una plataforma más versátil. A medida que 2025 avanza, los PCs han evolucionado aún más en términos de potencia, pero también en su precio. Esto es lo que ofrece un PC gaming de última generación:

1. Potencia y rendimiento superior: El PC ofrece una flexibilidad incomparable en términos de hardware. Puedes personalizar tu equipo a medida que avanzan los años, actualizando la tarjeta gráfica, el procesador, la memoria RAM, etc. Las GPUs de última generación, como las de la serie NVIDIA RTX 40, ofrecen un rendimiento impresionante, permitiendo jugar en resoluciones 4K a altas tasas de refresco (más de 120 FPS) y habilitar tecnologías como el trazado de rayos en tiempo real.

2. Juegos de PC y mods: El mercado de juegos para PC es vastísimo y se extiende mucho más allá de las exclusivas. La mayoría de los juegos se lanzan en PC y a menudo tienen precios más bajos o mejores ofertas. Además, en PC puedes disfrutar de la posibilidad de mods, lo que puede transformar un juego por completo, añadiendo contenido personalizado y mejorando la jugabilidad. Si eres un fanático de los mods, el PC es imbatible.

3. Multitarea y productividad: Un PC no es solo para juegos. Si también planeas usarlo para tareas como edición de videos, creación de contenido o programación, un PC te ofrece la flexibilidad de realizar todas esas tareas con un rendimiento superior. La PS5, aunque excelente en juegos, está limitada en términos de productividad.

4. Mayor control sobre la experiencia: Los PC permiten una personalización mucho mayor. Desde el tipo de pantalla que usas hasta los periféricos como teclados, ratones y auriculares, puedes escoger todo según tus necesidades y preferencias. Además, los ajustes gráficos en los juegos pueden ser configurados según tu hardware, lo que te permite encontrar el equilibrio perfecto entre calidad visual y rendimiento.

5. Costo y complejidad: Es importante mencionar que un PC de alta gama es una inversión significativa. Si bien puedes encontrar PCs más baratos, un equipo gaming decente, con una GPU potente, procesador de última generación y suficiente memoria, puede superar fácilmente los $1500-$2000 USD. Además, la construcción de un PC puede ser compleja para quienes no están familiarizados con el hardware.

¿Entonces, cuál es la mejor opción en 2025?

La PS5 es ideal para quienes buscan una opción sencilla, asequible y de alto rendimiento para jugar títulos exclusivos con facilidad. Si tu principal interés son los videojuegos y quieres una experiencia optimizada sin preocuparte por configuraciones o actualizaciones, la PS5 sigue siendo una excelente opción.

El PC, por otro lado, es perfecto para aquellos que buscan la mayor flexibilidad, potencia y personalización. Si te apasionan los gráficos de última generación, los mods, o necesitas un dispositivo que también te sirva para productividad o creación de contenido, un PC gaming de alto rendimiento será más adecuado.

En resumen, no existe una respuesta única. Todo depende de tus necesidades, tu presupuesto y lo que más valore tu estilo de vida como jugador. Ambas opciones ofrecen experiencias únicas y sobresalientes, pero mientras que la PS5 puede ser más sencilla y económica, el PC te da acceso a un mundo sin límites de personalización y poder. ¡La elección es tuya!

[crazevil]

AMD의 미래를 밝히는 CES 2025 신제품 발표: 그래픽 카드와 CPU 혁신의 현장

AMD CES 2025: 혁신을 이끌어 나가는 새로운 그래픽 카드와 CPU 소개

휴가철이 마무리되고 CES 2025가 시작되면서 많은 기대와 함께 AMD의 신제품 발표가 주목받고 있습니다. AMD는 매년 CES에서 차세대 칩셋을 발표하며 기술 애호가들의 시선을 사로잡아 왔는데요, 올해는 어떤 놀라운 제품들이 우리를 기다리고 있을까요?

1. 새로운 RX 9070 XT 그래픽 카드

이번 CES 2025에서 AMD는 RDNA 4 아키텍처를 기반으로 한 RX 9070 XT 그래픽 카드를 공개할 것으로 예상됩니다. 이 새로운 GPU는 중급 시장을 겨냥하며 높은 성능과 효율성을 제공합니다. 특히, 게이머들에게 큰 관심을 끌 것으로 예상되며, 경쟁력을 더욱 강화하는 제품으로 보입니다.

2. 기대되는 새로운 50시리즈 GeForce RTX GPU

AMD가 이번 CES에서 새로운 데스크톱 칩셋을 발표할 가능성이 높습니다. 통상적으로 랩톱 컴포넌트에 집중하던 AMD가 이번에는 전통을 깨고 데스크톱 중심의 GPU를 선보일 가능성이 있으며, 이로 인해 PC 게이머들의 관심이 집중되고 있습니다.

3. Strix Halo 모바일 칩과 차세대 게임용 CPU

Strix Halo 모바일 칩은 40개의 컴퓨트 유닛을 하나의 다이에 GPU와 함께 결합하여 더 작고 가벼운 게이밍 노트북을 제공할 것으로 기대되고 있습니다. 이 칩은 고성능과 휴대성을 동시에 누릴 수 있는 기회를 제공하며, AMD의 혁신적인 기술력을 보여주는 사례입니다. 더불어, 새로운 게임용 CPU 발표도 기대되며, 이는 Ryzen Z1 Extreme의 후속작으로서의 자리를 확실히 할 것으로 보입니다.

4. 실시간으로 함께하는 AMD 발표회

AMD의 CES 발표는 1월 6일 오후 2시(ET)에 실시간 스트리밍으로 진행되며, 기술 애호가와 소비자들은 최신 기술 트렌드와 혁신을 직접 경험할 수 있는 기회가 주어집니다.

AMD는 지속적으로 게이밍 및 컴퓨�� 성능을 향상시키며, 새로운 제품군을 통해 사용자들에게 더욱 향상된 경험을 제공하고자 합니다. CES 2025에서 AMD가 선보일 혁신적인 기술들을 기대하며, 앞으로 어떻게 시장의 흐름을 주도해 나갈지 지켜보는 재미도 클 것입니다. AMD의 발표가 다가오고 있는 지금, 최신 기술 뉴스에 주목해 보세요.

[theclubhero-blog]

AMD confirma que linha de APUs Ryzen Z2 vai ser usada por novo Steam Deck

Por Vinicius Torres Oliveira

A nova linha Ryzen Z2 vai contar com três modelos, sendo um deles exclusivos do Lenovo Legion Go S

A AMD anunciou oficialmente nesta segunda-feira (6) sua nova linha Ryzen Z2, criada especificamente para trabalhar com dispositivos portáteis focados em games. Segundo a companhia, seus novos modelos de APU vão ser usados por empresas como ASUS, Lenovo e Valve, servindo como base para a construção de uma segunda geração do Steam Deck.

O principal modelo inédito é o Z2 Extreme, que vai trazer 8 núcleos, 16 threads, 16 núcleos gráficos e TDP que varia entre 15W e 25W. Segundo a empresa, ele é baseado na arquitetura Strix Point e vai combinar três núcleos Zen 5 e cinco núcleos Zen 5c, trazendo 16 Unidades Computacionais (CUs) RDNA 3.5 para um melhor desempenho gráfico.

Já o AMD Ryzen Z2 será o modelo intermediário, trazendo 8 núcleos, 16 threads e 12 núcleos gráficos. Com TDP de 15W a 30W, ele surge como uma opção para fabricantes que desejam entegrar bons desempenhos para o público, mas não necessariamente pretendem oferecer hardwares de ponta — e com custos mais altos.

AMD Ryzen Z2 vai ter modelo exclusivo da Lenovo

Durante seu anúncio, a empresa também confirmou alguns rumores que começaram a circular em dezembro de 2024. Segundo ela, o modelo Ryzen Z2 GO vai ser uma APU exclusiva do Lenovo Legion Go S, novo portátil que promete ter características mais modestas, ao mesmo tempo em que apresenta um preço mais acessível.

A versão mais discreta da nova linha da AMD traz somente 4 núcleos Zen 3+ com 8 threads, TDP de 15W a 30W e 12 núcleos gráficos. A companhia também confirmou outros detalhes do vazamento, que já indicava que o Z2 GO vai usar a arquitetura de GPU Zen 2, enquanto o Ryzen Z2 usa a RDNA 3 e o Z2 Extreme adota a RDNA 3.5.

Embora a fabricante não tenha confirmado quais dispositivos vão usar sua nova arquitetura de APUs, o fato de ela ter mencionado a ASUS e a Valve já dá alguns sinais do que o público pode esperar. No entanto, até o momento as duas empresas ainda não revelaram intenções de divulgar publicamente como pretendem usar o poderio das novas soluções da AMD.

[playitvison]

AMD is showing off its next generation of handheld gaming PCs at CES 2025

At CES 2025, AMD has finally unveiled the chipset behind the next generation handheld gaming computers, AMD Zen 2 Extreme. The AMD Zen 2 Extreme, along with its smaller Z2 and Z2 Go cousins, are powered by Zen 5 CPU cores. While the Zen 2 Extreme is using an RDNA 3.5 based GPU, the Z2 and Z2 Go continue to use RDNA 3 and RDNA 2 respectively. This creates a whole family of APUs (Advanced…