#project2

[double-ended]

git gud sgrub

lol. 2tealiing that la2t word.

[beaconsculpture2]

[gh02t-k1ng]

Old drawiing that wa2 liike half rendered 2o ii fiinnally fiinii2hed iit cau2e all my iin fiinii2hed project2 r eating away at me bluegh

Al2o cau2e valantiine2 ii2 coming up and my n my friiend r dre22iing up a2 Roxy n Jane for a con the day after :3c

[lemonthepotato]

College killed my productivity

I went from one draft a month for ProjectDecology (placeholder name), one proofread of Project2, one edit of Project4, all in a month for the past few months, to… crashing at 6:30PM because I’m exhausted and waking up at 4AM, still on the same chapter I’ve been at for days, still editing.

I know not eating anything at college isn’t a bright idea but I’m too weight conscious. Maybe it’s also the fact I haven’t been in a classroom setting in… seven years. And the only job I had is 2 hours volunteer work 2 days a week. Won’t share anything beyond that.

This is week 1.

[thebalancedangel]

[BG3 x Pokémon crossover where Halsin has a "Porygon"("Project1")and a Silvally.

Silvally is still a man-made Pokémon and named itself that when it broke free of its mask after trying to protect Halsin(Halsin spoke to it about Silvanus). The memories used to change its type were found where Silvally was caged.

Project1 is a whittled duck that spontaneously came to life, it evolves into Project2 that evolves into ProjectFinal and are all still Normal types. I'm not sure about the Upgrade and Dubious Disc equivalents, LOL. Further whittling, maybe? This Pokémon and its evolution also named themselves and act like robots despite their wooden origins.]

[ambuschool]

The beauty of Yarra River

Tadi menjelang sunset aku duduk di pinggiran Yarra River. Mencoba merenung apa yang kulakukan hari ini :

1. Mengantar anakku ke childcare

2. Mencari jam tangan

3. Mentoring

4. Training kerja jadi mbak-mbak indomaret

5. Dapet email dari SCO kok gak ambil full matkul semester depan

6. Dapet email dari capstone coordinator kalau aku better ambil non-riset capstone aja karena aku bakal ngos2an kalau ambil riset.

Rasanya kaya nge-debrief diri sendiri pas tadi duduk sekitar setengah jam itu.

Rasanya seneng bgt bisa terlibat di program hibah buat temen2 NGO di Indonesia. Dengerin project2 mereka yang keren-keren dan mostly tntg kesehatan, aku ngerasa kaya catch up sama “dunia nyata” karena setahun ini bergelit sama paper-paper akademik. Kaya ngerasa “oh ada gunanya gue sekolah MPH, lol” 😂

Terus pas training kerja jadi mbak-mbak kasir, kepikiran kaya S1 mati2an belajar buat jadi perawat, kok skrg sayang bgt ilmunya gak dipake dan menguap begitu saja 😂 malah milih kerja jadi mbak-mbak kasir instead of kerja di Aged Care, misalkan, yang lebih nursing. Tapi kaya, yaudalah, pragmatis dulu kita butuh duit buat lunasin hutang, lol.

Dapet email dari capstone coordinator, rasanya ada rasa sedihnya, karena nilaiku sebenernya eligible, tapi karena sangat mepet, capstone coordinator-ku merasa aku akan terseok2 kalau memaksakan riset. Bener juga sih. Mungkin emang belum saatnya riset, dan jika emang harus pake master thesis untuk melangkah ke PhD, mungkin academia is not my path (at least for now). Jadi kayanya mau aku iyakan saran dari course coordinator-ku untuk aku mengambil public health in practice aja.

Mungkin ini juga doa-doaku ketika meminta petunjuk atas kegalauanku, Kerja dulu atau langsung lanjut PhD? Kalau jalannya kaya gini, kaya udh lumayan jelas kayanya gak akan bisa PhD dlm waktu dekat, instead, mendingan cari kerja di tempat yang bagus aja. Fyuh.. semoga..

Ternyata cari kerja juga gak mudah ya kan.. Kemarin iseng ngobrol sama Kak Ayen, kalau aku pengen apply kerja di Ashoka EU, karena mereka ada kerjasama dengan Bohringer tentang Social Innovation in health sector gitu. Tapi ya entahlah, hahaaha.

Jadi.. kayanya stop mencari wangsit tentang S3. Your path is not there (yet). Or at least, lo belum bs excel di path itu, untuk saat ini.

Oh, inhale exhale…. Semoga Allah mudahkan langkah2ku kedepan, termasuk dalam mendapatkan pekerjaan selama semester break ini hahahaha.

[blablapret]

Belajar Mencintai Kekacauan

Ide-ide yang datang kepada kita harus kita perlakukan dengan hormat. Jangan sampai ide-ide ini disia-siakan di tangan kita. Di tangan si penggagas ide itu sendiri. 

Menghargai ide yang datang adalah dengan cara mencintai proses. Proses itu rumit, proses itu kacau. Dan ini yang bikin kehidupan kek roller coaster, bukan? :D

Dari proses, kita belajar utk bersahabat dengan rasa kecewa jika tidak berjalan sesuai rencana. Dari proses, kita belajar menaklukan diri sendiri = ternyata hanya dengan konsistensi dan persistensi, ide2 yg awalnya abstrak bisa jadi nyata.

Karya adalah SEMUA yang terjadi di hari itu. Itulah proses, bukan sebuah benda.

Indahnya berkeluarga, kita selalu bisa mendiskusikan ide2 yang datang dengan pasangan dan anak2. Tantangannya adalah, membuat semua anggota keluarga merasa nyaman menyampaikan pendapatnya-walaupun tahu ga semua pendapat bisa dijalani. Dan beruntungnya saya diberikan pasangan si paling let's go. Yang selalu me-let's go-kan ide2 random saya sekalipun :))

Ini lah alasan saya ingin berkeluarga dulu: pengan punya keluarga Mastermind, yaitu sahabat berdiskusi ternyaman. Wadah dimana semua anggota keluarga berhak berpendapat, dan mengalirkan rasa tanpa takut di-judge. Tapi pada kenyataannya, tidak semudah itu mencapai titik ini.

Untuk bisa mencapai titik "Mastermind", kita perlu banyak latihan. Ga bisa ujug2 kompak. Cara melatihnya adalah dengan membiasakan membuat project bersama.

"Mau bikin project apa lagi ya?" ini yg sering jadi obrolan saya dan suami.

Segalanya berawal dari NGOBROL. Melibatkan anak2 sejak dini dengan project2 yg kita garap bisa melatih mereka menyampaikan pendapat, embrace ketidaknyamanan dalam menjalani proses, belajar kecewa dan belajar sedih jika pendapatnya ga dipakai, belajar menerima hasil musyawarah dengan lapang dada, belajar memahami value keluarga yg kami tanamkan pada setiap project.

Value apa yg ingin ditanamkan supertabi? Value ketauhidan, berani mencoba hal baru, berani mencintai proses. Tauhid menjadi penting karena akan menjadi batasan. Semua boleh kecuali yg dilarang syariat.

Tugas orangtua adalah menularkan semangat dan aura optimis. Bahagia itu menular, bukan?

TIPS. Untuk awalan memulai project dgn anak:

Ajak ngobrol: Apa yg paling disukai anak? karena outputnya harus bikin anak ketagihan.

Bikin project dgn durasi yg pendek. Coba maksimal 3 hari.

Akhiri dengan ngobrol. 3 hal yg perlu dibahas: 1. Apa yg paling seru saat ngerjain project ini? 2. Apresiasi (ucapan terimakasih), 3. Mau sukses apa lagi setelah ini? Apapun hasilnya, anggap saja anak sukses. Rayakan!

Buat ibu2 yg suka overthinking dengan hasil akhir (RUMAH BERANTAKAN). Sesi beres2 HARUS DIBAHAS pada saat diskusi berlangsung. Anak2 harus berperan ikut beres2. Berhentilah ngerjain project sebelum tenaga habis total, supaya masih punya tenaga buat beres2 :))

UNTUK SIPALING PERFEKSIONIS (me, me, me!) : Mulai aja dulu. Mengeksekusi ide ga harus sempurna. Bisa jadi, kita yg memulai dan anak2 kita yg menyempurnakannya di masa yg akan datang. Ini bukan tentang kompetisi, tapi kolaborasi.

@gitpret

[deletedg1rl]

10th June 2024

today i watched lect2 from cs50ai, tried solving bfs problems, tried doing project1 and project2 from cs50, started lect3, learned about text preprocessing techniques. its 4.5. yesterday was also 4.5. i need to start early. if i do 2 hours before 12 in the morning i can do 6 hours a day i think.

[codingprolab]

CSC/CPE349 Project2: Matrix Multiplication Algorithms PART 2

PART 2 (85% of the credit for Project2): Divide-and-conquer algorithms Goals of the assignment: 1. Implement divide-and-conquer algorithms. 2. Implement two classic algorithms for matrix multiplication. 2. Handle intricate details of recursive matrix manipulation – identifying and working with segments of two-dimensional arrays, constructing two-dimensional arrays from smaller ones. I. Design and…

[nursingwriter]

Pre-diabetes and Diabetes Early Awareness Education and Its Effects on BMI Submitted by: Nancy L. Gee Comment by Pamela Love: Looks like an interesting project, Nancy.Very good start! Be sure whenever you submit your manuscript that you change wording from study to project and avoid referring to the project as research. Review carefully for grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, format, or APA errors. Pay close attention to the reviewers comments as you continue on this DNP journey. Stay focused &be sure to follow the DPI template as you prepare for IRB submission.For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Jeremiah 29:11 (NIV).Blessings, breathe, and believe,Dr. Love Direct Practice Improvement Project Proposal Doctor of Nursing Practice Grand Canyon University Phoenix, Arizona Running head: EARLY AWARENESS 7 EARLY AWARENESS February 14, 2018 2/14/18 Table of Contents List of Figures.iv Comment by Maria Thomas: ?? Chapter 1: Introduction to the Project..1 Introduction1 Background of the Project2 Problem Statement5 Purpose of the Project.......7 Clinical Question..8 Advancing Scientific Knowledge.9 Significance of the Project..11 Rationale for Methodology.13 Nature of the Research Design for the Project............................14 Definition of Terms.16 Assumptions, Limitations, Delimitations...17 Summary and Organization of the Remainder of the Project19 Chapter 2: Literature Review21 Introduction to the Chapter and Background to the Problem21 Theoretical Foundations and Conceptual Framework..23 Review of the Literature.29 Theme 1..29 Theme 2..43 Summary56 Chapter 3: Methodology58 Introduction.58 Statement of the Problem59 Clinical Question60 Project Methodology...61 Project Design.62 Population and Samples Selection..66 Instrumentation ..67 Validity68 Reliability69 Data Collection Procedures.71 Data Analysis Procedures...73 EthicalConsiderations74 Limitations.75 Summary.76 Appendix A96 List of Figures Figure 1: Health Belief Model Conceptual Framework27 ii 58 EARLY AWARENESS Figure 2: Graphics of Research Process Onion.59 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Project In society today, obesity is a serious comorbidity with the prevalence in the United States (US) continuing to increase (Jarolimova,Tagoni, &Stern, T. A., 2013). Obesity is a leadingcause of increased risks for developing many health problems such as an excessive rise in bodyweight. Furthermore, it isone of the most essential and changeable risk factors within the pathogenesis of health are complications problems like type-1 diabetes (T1D) andtype-2 diabetes (T2D). These problems are well, thus, is documented in most biochemical studies as well as cross-sectional research (Piven, 2014). In current times, there are many all-important biochemical studies in the inter-relationship amid body mass index (BMI) and its connection with the advancement of diabetic issues (Innocent, Oweh, Sandra & Josiah, 2013). Comment by Thomas, Maria: Space Comment by Thomas, Maria: Remove and change all tracking changes before submission for AQR Clarify this. Check for sentence flow so it is easy for the reader to follow your logic The Center for Disease Control (CDC) anticipates that nearly thirty-three percent of adults may have diabetes by the year 2050 (CDC, 2010; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2016); as presently, more than twenty-nine million adults in America have been diagnosed with diabetic issues, and an additional eighty-six million have pre-diabetes (Statistics about Diabetes, n.d; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2016). Pre-diabetes is a diagnosis where blood sugar levels are elevated, however lesser than the established inception of diabetes (Kowall et al., 2012). Kowallet al. (2012) write pre-diabetes is a result of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT), or perhaps a mixture of IFG and IGT (p. 828). Moreover, diabetes has numerous effects which might consist of several health disorders and, in a few instances, failure of bodily organs (Tabk, Herder, Rathmann, Brunner, & Kivimki, 2012; Brown, 2017). Thus, T2D puts individuals at risk for a variety of ailments like cardiac conditions, amputations, renal malfunction, vision loss, as well as obesity. Weight reduction has been seen to stop the triggering of T2D and morbid obesity in individuals having pre-diabetes (Brown & Kuk, 2015). As a result, early diagnosis and management of pre-diabetes can avoid its crossover to complete onset diabetes and thus reduce the related problems (Brown & Kuk, 2015, p. 79). Little is known about how patients respond to Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME). Thus, the goal of this project study will be to measure the awareness and knowledge of pre-diabetes and diabetic risk factors among obese patients in a family practice clinic. The project study adopts a quantitative approach using a descriptive method and pre-post tests to determine subjects' understanding and knowledge of pre-diabetes and T2D. The pretests will establish current knowledge ,and gaps about diabetes awareness, and post-test will determine the knowledge the participants gained from the Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) intervention. The results will state the advancement of the pre-diabetes and diabetes informative and knowledge-based programs. Comment by Pamela Love: Project, not study. Correct throughout paper. This chapter focuses on a particular target audience while describing the idiosyncrasies of this Direct Patient Improvement (DPI) project such as background of the study, problem statement, purpose of the study, clinical question(s), advancing scientific knowledge, significance of the study, rationale for methodology, nature of the study, definition of terms, assumptions, limitations and delimitations and lastly, summary and organization of the remaining chapters. Background to the Project The frequency of identified diabetic issues amid U.S. adults has gone up twofold within the past four decades and seventy-five percent in the past twenty-five years (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration, 2016; Gregg et al., 2004; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006). The lifetime danger of acquiring diabetes within the U.S. in 2000 had been 33% for males and 39% for females,and this had been even greater amid U.S. minority communities (Narayan et al., 2003). BMI is a highly reliable, yet a controllable risk element for diabetes (American Diabetes Association, 2017; Ford, Williamson and Liu, 1997; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, 2002). Nevertheless, the link between pre-diabetes, diabetes,and BMI has notbeen extensively examined (Arayan, James, Theodore,et al., 2007). Medical experts use BMI to determine whether a person is overweight, obese, normal or underweight. It is a dtermination of the ratio of a persons weight and their height (Lo, Wong, Khalechelvam and Tam, 2016). The following are details of the findings from research, about the relationship between the BMI ratio, pre-diabetes, and diabetes. It was found by Narayanet al. (2007) that ones risk of developing diabetes in their lifetime is one in three, at the point of birth. He further noted that the risks of developing the condition across the categories of BMI over a lifetime are still unclear. The study sought to demonstrate the specific lifetime risks for the various BMIs for people in the US, based on sex, ethnicity, and age subgroups (Narayan et al., 2007). The survey data from the National Health Interview n=780, 694, from 1997 to 2004 was the basis for indicating race, sex, age, ethnicity, and the prevalence of BMI-linked occurrence of diabetes in the US in 2004 (Narayan et al., 2007). The data from the US Census Bureau including age, sex-specific mortality, population rate projections, and race were used along with two earlier studies relating to mortality, to project the mortality rates related to BMI ratios (Narayan et al., 2007). The findings and estimates informed the Markov Model projection of the lifetime risks of diabetes diagnosed by race, sex baseline age, and BMI. According to the results, the lifetime risk of developing diabetes at the age of eighteen for underweight people was 7.6,and those who were obese was 70.3%. The figures also increased from 12.2 to 74.4 for women in the same weight categories. The difference in lifetime risk was lower at advanced ages. For example, at age 65, healthynormal weight males had their lifetime risk difference rise from 3.7 to 23.9 points in percentages between overweight people and the ones regarded as very obese. The figure increased by 8.7 percentage points to 26.7 for women (Narayan et al., 2007a). It was also determined that the effect of BMI on the duration of diabetes compounded with an increase in ones age (Narayan et al., 2007b). The risk of developingdiabetes was investigated in case-control research by Ganzet al. (2014) by studying its incidence versus BMI ratios. The rising effect of BMI, based on BMI categories was assessed. Those who recorded weights between 25 and 29.9 were considered overweight. Moreover, then there was the Obesity Class I who measured between 30 and 34.9. Class II Obesity group registered BMI index from 35 to 39.9. Obesity Class III on its part recorded figures equal to or over 40(Ganz et al., 2014). Relative risks and ratios regarding the odds were calculated from a range of logistic regression outcomes. Age, cardiac history, sex, and hyper-inflammatory were used to select group subjects (Ganz et al., 2014). Measures of BMI were taken a year preceding the first diagnosis of T2D. BMI was obtained from dates that were randomly assigned for those that were in control group. The relationship between BMI and the incidence of diabetes is strong with the risk increasing with higher BMI (Ganz et al., 2014). There is a significant correlation between diabetes and being overweight. Some studies have established a compelling link between the two factors. In one study, for instance, Akbari et al. (2017) found that patient education regarding T2D can help reduce barriers. The core aim of the study was to establish the impact of an education program intervention, using the beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms and enabling factorsmodel (BASNEF) on awareness barriers, adaptation, lifestyle and support for patients living with T2D (Akbari, 2017). Comment by Thomas, Maria: Spell out first time use Removing the barriers associated with pre-diabetes and diabetes is a reasonable step towards empowering patients with diabetes to manage their lives with the condition and to recognize what affects the barriers (Akbari, 2017). The findings indicated that there was a clear difference between a score derived from living barriers such as lifestyle, awareness, protection and adaptation components, and the BASNEF model variable, i.e., enabling factors, attitude, subjective norm, knowledge, and behavioral intention (Akbari, 2017). Problem Statement T2D also referred to asnon-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), makes up most cases of diabetes mellitus globally. In 2000 there had been roughlyone hundred and fifty million people with the illness and that this quantity is most likely to increase twofold by the year 2025 (Kaveeshawar & Cornwall, 2014; King, Aubert, & Herman, 1998). T2D will be the fourth or perhaps the fifth prominent cause of demise in many developed nations and there's expanding proof that this has attained epidemic dimensions in quite a few developing and recently industrialized nations (Amos, McCarty, &Zimmet, 1997). All-time low levels of T2Dare found in places where individuals retain a traditional lifestyle (Gray, 2015; Bennett, 1999). Dramatic modifications in the frequency ofthe occurrence of T2D is found in places where there have already been significant changes in the kind of foods utilized. The food choices range from the conventional native diet plan to a standard western diet plan (Hu, 2011; Bennett, 1999; Lako and Nguyen, 2001; Hetzel and Michael, 1987). Changing illness levels are revealed by modifications in some dietary elements along with modifications in other lifestyle associated elements, notably a decrease in physical exercise (Sami, Ansari, Butt, Rashid, & Hamid, 2017; Steyn et al., 2004). Comment by Maria Thomas: Space It is not known if and to what degree these facts are known to diabetes patients. Therefore, Because of these facts, the purpose of this project study is to assess the awareness and knowledge of diabetes amongst patients with prediabetes in a family practice clinic. After carrying out DSME pre-intervention assessments on patients with prediabetes, gaps will be recognized in awareness and understanding of prediabetes and diabetes amongst diabetes patientsthe subjects. Measurement of BMI will be completedpre-test and eight weeks after post-test to assess the effects of the DSME intervention related to weight loss. Comment by Thomas, Maria: Present a clear declarative statement that begins with It is not known if and to what degree/extent..., or It is not known how/why and. Comment by Thomas, Maria: Include the broad population affected by the problem Absent from the literature is information on how patients respond to self-management methods that should be adopted to attain the preferred benefits, and precisely what they will do with the knowledge they gain from DSME educational interventions. There's an expanding demand for interventions that enhance patients understanding and knowledge of pre-diabetes and diabetes (Islam et al., 2014). The substantial population at an increased risk for or with diabetes is actually within the age bracket of 25 - 65 years. Insufficient steps to decrease theoccurrence of pre-diabetes might result in a considerable boost in health investment, morbidity, as well as other associated health circumstance (National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014, para 8). For healthcare providers managing an increased incidence of diabetes diagnoses, health interventions will be essential to avoid diabetic issues or postpone their development (Islam et al., 2014). Such endeavors can consist of acompletelifestyle change for all those at an increased risk for pre-diabetic issues and timely treatment for patients suffering from the disorder. An ambitious method focusing on individuals at an increased risk of diabetes is a significant public health strategy targeted at reducing the threat elements for pre-diabetes and diabetes (International Diabetes Federation, 2013). Purpose of the Project The purpose of this Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) project is to evaluate awareness and understanding concerning pre-diabetes and diabetes in pre-diabetic individuals and the effects of the DSME on BMI. To determine if the patients qualify for the study and are pre-diabetic, the researcher will utilize patientshealthcare records to choose individuals with increased fasting glucose (IFG), and hypertension in the family practice clinic. The potential study participant will be recognized as obese if they have aBMI of more than 30kg/m2. Obesity and hypertension are both related to diabetes and may be considered as inclusion criteria. The independent variables will be the DSME intervention plan,and the dependent variable will be patients awareness level about the threat of acquiring T2D and awareness concerning risk lowering habits and treatments, and these factors will be assessed utilizing the Diabetic Knowledge Test 2 (DKT2), a close-ended questionnaire. The DKT2 was designed and developed by the Michigan Diabetes Research Training Center (MDRTC). Its purpose is for testing common knowledge of diabetes in pre-diabetic and diabetic patients.Thuspatients. Thus, the study uses a quantitative descriptive research design. Another dependent variable will be BMI assessment. The BMI will be measured by weighing the patient before awareness education and eight weeks after receiving the DSME intervention. Additional independent variables are how awareness and understanding levels amongst individuals differ based on education level,andlastly, the health belief model will be the theoretical foundation for this study. This project will make use of diabetes associated queries in the pre-assessment to evaluate and classify individuals according to their understanding and knowledge of diabetic issues. Theseinclusion criteria for this study will be adults of both sexes with a BMI of more than 30kg/m2. Moreover, the results might be helpful in the advancement of future interventions towards decreasing pre-diabetes and diabetes risk in communities with ahigherrisk of acquiring T2D. Clinical Question: The clinical question is: Among pre-diabetic patients with a BMI > 30kg/m2in a family practice clinic to what extent does providing diabetic education using Diabetic Self-Management Education (DSME) compared to providing no education result in improvement in patient awareness and knowledge of pre-diabetes and diabetes and a decreased BMI over an eight week period? When promoting interventions to assist with prevention and control of diabetes, awareness is an essential resource (Demaio et al., 2013). There's a connection amid individuals with reduced levels of health understanding and increased diabetic problems (Maina, Ndegwa, Njenga, &Muchemi, 2011). Patients understanding of their health could be helpful in the assessment of the risks associated with developing diabetes, DSME interventions to reduce the risk, and their control over lifestyle changes including weight reduction. Consequently, outcomes of this research will promote stakeholders, within the healthcare sector to plan, create, and implement complete health campaigns focused on pre-diabetes-related DSME interventions. The project will analyze the understanding and awareness of diabetes amongst patients with prediabetes in a family practice clinic with a BMI >30kg/m2. The research project query is: among pre-diabetic patients with a BMI > 30kg/m2in a family practice clinic to what extent does providing diabetic education using Diabetic Self-Management Education (DSME) compared to providing no education result in improvement in patient awareness and knowledge of pre-diabetes and diabetes and a decreased BMI over an eight week period.The independent variable will be the DSME intervention plan,and the dependent variable is patients awareness level about the threat of acquiring T2D and awareness concerning risk lowering habits and treatments, and these factors will be assessed utilizing a quantitativedescriptive research design and the DKT2. The DKT2will be used to assess participants knowledge pre-DSME and post-DSME. Other dependent variables will be BMI assessment. The BMI will be measured by weighing the patient before pre-diabetes awareness education and eight weeks after receiving the intervention. Additional dependent variables are how awareness and understanding levels amongst individuals differ based on education level,and lastly, the health belief model will be used as the theoretical foundation for the projectstudy. Advancing Scientific Knowledge There is a controversy inexistence, relating to the BMI mortality diabetes paradox in which the BMI optimal category is higher in patients that are non-diabetic.Bayset al. (2007) noted that not all obese or overweight cases develop diabetes and that not all with diabetic conditions were necessarily obese or overweight (Bays et al., 2007). A paradox regarding BMI ratios and diabetes still exists and needs a solution. Controversy is still rife related to the relationship between BMI and the occurrence of pre-diabetes and diabetes. Physicians will be empowered to minimize the risk factors for diabetes sooner if there is afull understanding of the relationship between the two. Modern day is well known for the diabetes epidemic. Read the full article

[gg-gloriagan]

[In-process Work]

Update topics for the project2:

To be honest, there are a few ideas in my mind about what I can do for project2.

Continues to develop the idea of people trapped inside their comfort zone, with the reflection through glasses, water, mirrors, lenses, shadows, etc. This idea was stuck because I was exploring ways to express my thoughts through pictures, which is ideal but not practical.

Trying the double exposure technique (shared by Norah) and doing some experiments on corridors, windows, shelves, etc.

To be continued... there are also better ideas to develop, and it will happen when I shoot more pictures

Need advice and comments!

[ankitcodinghub]

CS6238: Secure Computer Systems Project2 Solved

Project II: Strengthening Login Security with Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) Learning Objectives: This project aims to enhance password security by incorporating a second authentication factor (2FA). We’ll explore this concept by modifying the Linux login implementation. While the specific implementation may be simplified for educational purposes, the underlying principles are similar to…

[programmingandengineering]

CSE358/CSE5058 Artificial Intelligence Project2

Project Definition In this project, you are required to color the map of the South America continent using a backtracking search algorithm. When coloring the map, two neighboring countries should not have the same color. Furthermore, you can use at most 4 different colors (blue, green, red, and yellow). Table 1 presents the border neighborhoods of the countries in South America. You need to embed…

[xuwenzhuo]

Project2

For Project 2, I made a model of a park slide that kids love to play on. Here are the references I looked for for the model, and in the process of looking for references, it also brought me back to my childhood memories.

Model 1.0, consists of three parts: stairs, corridor and slide, where the slide part is spiral.

After building the model, I imported the uv into Substance Painter to create the materials. The slide, roof, fence on both sides of the corridor and the floor are all made of plastic. The escalators, columns and stairs are made of iron. The overall material is mostly saturated colors, with the black color of the stairs balancing out the overall bright image.

Model 2.0: After creating the materials, the model always looked too bulky, so I changed the spiral slide to a straight one.

The material was changed to a smoother plastic, and the color was changed from orange-red to purple, to give some cooler tones to the warmer image, and to make the overall color more harmonious.

Finally, the material was imported into blender, sunlight and HDR added and rendered.

Material details

[blablapret]

Petualangan Supertabi mencari jati diri

Setiap tahun, CBE mengadakan event yg bernama Family Festival. Ini adalah parade kumpulan keluarga yg mempresentasikan masing-masing project unik keluarga dan juga visi misinya.

Dokumentasi pertama kalinya supertabi ikutan Family Festival (2023)

Kami adalah contoh home team yg masih mencari jati diri tentang core kami. Sebagai ADHDers yg impulsif, saya dan suami punya banyak ide kegiatan.

Mulai dari bangun bisnis keluarga, berkebun, ngompos, bikin produk2 fermentasi seperti yogurt dan kombucha, Home Cafe (cooking class), outing, camping, Fun Math, English time, Book and Tea (Literasi), angkat barbel, olah vokal, sepedaan bareng, renang bareng, ngaji bareng, nonton bareng, menggambar bareng, sampe bobok bareng (halah, yg terakhir pake ditulis sagala wkwk). Pokoknya semua ke-random-an ini kita jalanin bersama :))

Walaupun banyak Family Project yg kami buat, tapi ga semuanya istiqomah.  Setidaknya dgn trial error ini kami jadi lebih mengenal karakter keluarga kami. Macam "oh ini cocok, ini ga cocok. Oh ini digas, ini direm dulu."

Kegiatan yg masih eksis dan konsisten sampe sekarang: bisnis keluarga, Ramadan camp tiap taun (itikaf bareng bocil2 + anak orang), fun math, english time, home cafe (experiment berbagai resep kopi), ngaji bareng.

Kegiatan yg udah berjalan tapi ngerjainnya masih moody-moody-an: Olahraga (angkat barbel, renang, sepedaan), shaum sunnah, side project bisnis (maen microstock), mengelola aset digital (Blog, Youtube, Tiktok, Instagram Supertabi)

Kegiatan yg kami suka banget hasilnya tapi males bikinnya: produk fermentasi, cooking class (baking)

Kegiatan baru mulai dan masih meraba2: Berkebun, komposting, ternak ikan.

Kegiatan literasi cuma cocok utk saya dan Tabina. Tp ga cocok buat suami. Sore2 saya dan anak gadis suka baca buku favorit bareng sambil ngeteh dan dengerin lagu bangsawan misal seriosa :))

Kegiatan crafting cocok buat suami, tabina & babang, tp kurang di saya.

Kegiatan yg saya dan anak2 suka, tapi suami ga mau ikut praktek: Olah Vokal wkwkwk. Btw olah vokal tu bukan karena kita pengen jadi artis atau ikut opera. Tapi karena kami merasa butuh memperbaiki artikulasi dan bukaan rahang. Sangat berguna buat saya praktek tahsin, melafalkan huruf hijaiyah ga boleh miring2. Dan sangat berguna utk Tabina yg tiap presentasi di depan kelas suaranya keciiil, siga chipmunk :)

But it's ok kita tetep lanjutin.

Dari semuanya,

Ada jg project yg hanya berlangsung 1x dan ga bisa diulangin: Hijrah ke Soreang: Beli rumah, renov, bikin desain rumah sendiri dgn software Adobe Illustrator (Saya lupa cara pake Autocad T_T). Ini adalah project ter-epicnya supertabi sih. Penuh pengorbanan dan kesabaran. Tp saya jadi berpikir bisa2 aja diulangin kok. Sering2 aja rombak rumah. Hahaha.

Seiring berjalannya waktu, project2 ini akan terus bertambah, atau mengerucut, sesuai kebutuhan dan keunikan masing2 anggota keluarga kami. Saat ini memang masih random sih, tapi tujuannya memang utk memperkenalkan ragam kegiatan utk anak2 kami. Akan ada waktunya dimana project ini diinisiasi oleh anak, dan mereka sendiri yg menjadi project leadernya. Kami gantian jadi supporter :)

@gitpret