#parasocial tag

[solitary-confinement-bee]

Just some people life has been making me feel like lately

[saeino]

hallo !

my name is SIN (capitalised) or maeno ! i’m an introject who uses any or mirrored pronouns ! i’m unsure on how old i am , but i present as an adult - our body is also chrono 22 so i have to ask anyone under 16 to not interact with us unless we know you or we do first . parasocial relationships are not only accepted, but encouraged ! IDs , stances and tags under the cut ^.^

CisIDS : PTSD + DID, schizophrenia, AuDHD, chronic pain, chronic fatigue, BPD, NPD, OCD, IED, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, PCOS

TransIDS : transharmen, permamanic, permaimpure, permaviolent, permacaged, permadog, transcannibal, transfollower (like for fults), transscientist, transstalker, transslasher/serialkiller, transshota, transhaten, transpervert, transthreatening/scary, transIDhoarder, transbitch, transscars

Paraphilias : Ⰱ, 🧟, 🦴, sadomasochism, objectophilia, agalmatophilia, aptophilia, autoaptophilia, emapihtophilia, haemotophilia, oplophilia, apagophilia, dacryphilia, peiramaphilia, maniaphilia, phobophilia, anophelorastia, anthropophagy, phagophilia, asthenolagnia

our personal contact stance is anti-contact for the big 3, but we don’t care what you believe or do as long as you aren’t advocating for harm to animals or children, meaning xenosatanists dni .

tags :

#SIN.txt : text posts

#SIN.jpg : images

#SIN.mov : videos

#SIN.doc : aesthetics (gifs, images etc that i relate to / find pleasing?)

#ANSWERS.doc : asks

#ANON.xml : anons

[san-sebastienne]

With truly all the love and empathy in my heart: crying daily over the sexual assault allegations against Gaiman isn’t healthy. I’ve seen multiple people –especially fans of GO – saying this since they came out, and it’s really fucking concerning me.

I wonder if it has to do with the insidious ideas that 1) people are either Bad or Good, 2) Bad people can only do Bad things, and 3) liking Bad things or Bad people makes you Bad.

None of these things are true.

People are mixed up and incredibly complicated. Someone can be an incredible artist/friend/chef/ally against racism/drag queen and still be predatory/homophobic/antisemitic/never tips their wait staff. People do things that harm others in big and small ways all the time. You do too. I promise.

(Also the idea of anyone, even people who do genuinely insurmountable harm, becoming somehow less than human is an inherently fascist ideology)

The fact that you (yes, you!!) do harmful things doesn’t immediately make you Bad. There are certainly things that someone might do that causes more harm (say, assault) versus less, but that doesn’t somehow infect all the things they’ve done in the past with their Badness. Gaiman helped write Good Omens. There’s no way now to say “I was wrong and this book was Bad all along” or even “oh, all the parts I like were written by Pratchett, the Bad parts must have been Gaiman.” You didn’t miss an inherent evil by liking the book in the past. It doesn’t make you Bad for liking it now.

(It also doesn’t mean that people associated with Gaiman, like David Tennant, are also Tainted by inherent Badness. Tennant isn’t, you aren’t. Saying otherwise is also a slippery slope argument into dehumanization and fascist ideas)

By all means: if it feels right, stop giving Gaiman your money. Stop tagging him in your Azi/Crowley fanart. But do this as a way to disentangle yourself from parasocial relationships that are actively causing you grief and to vote with your wallet, not because unlinking yourself from Bad Art and Bad People will somehow absolve you and make you Good again. If you already have a copy of Good Omens or Sandman, whether you reread it is between you and your gods. Interacting with a text you find important doesn’t make you Bad or Good. It’s just reading. What you do with the stories is what matters (ironically, that’s the message of a lot of both Gaiman and Pratchett’s work).

Maybe take a peek at Good Omens and re familiarize yourself with its other core message: People are not Bad or Good. People do bad and good things.

Then maybe drink a cup of tea. You need to rehydrate.

[beebfreeb]

*shaking a little* unposted Akizets

[blossoms-phan]

many people are afraid to be real lovers. dan and phil are not

[the-meme-monarch]

hi i like toontownjournalist’s blog and I’ve wanted to draw a character based on them/their pfp ever since i came across them. ended up with three

[lesbiangiratina]

Theyre so cute wtf.

[iknowwhereyousnoozeatnight]

tennis

[solitary-confinement-bee]

[black-swan-slaps]

I try to keep my comments to myself and just reblog jikook funsizes (and also yoongi) but y'all...we've lost the plot.

We do not personally know Jimin, Jungkook, or V. We never will. That is okay. What that means is we do not and will not ever understand the intricacies of their relationships. We have to remember that these three have known each other for a very long time, have trained together, worked together, traveled the world together, and even fought with each other. But they still love and respect each other. Which means we have to trust that if they have any serious issues with each other, they will address it. We know for a fact this is how bts deal with interpersonal drama -- they address it with each other.

Are You Sure is the first time in a WHILE that we've gotten to see "unfiltered" members. These are full adult men. They are not our projections of what we think they are or would like them to be. Jungkook is a "no thoughts, head empty" kind of guy. He has said this himself. Does that mean I think he's never had a deep thought or dark emotions? No, of course not, but it's become very clear from these episodes that he follows his instincts and whims (much like we praise Jin for). Jungkook is weird and silly and hard working and caring and also a brat. He also works as an "entertainer" when not singing in a concert. He is aware when filming any kind of variety show, especially one focused on him, he should probably play around. Not saying I know his intentions for why he does anything, but like, let the dude chill?

Yes, Jimin was not feeling well again. But, and this may come off harsh, I think we also all know that Jimin has had a myrid of health issues throughout the years, which means the other members are probably used to this and likely know his limits. As someone who is also very accident prone and deals with health issues, I am no stranger to my friends being dismayed when I am once again hurt, but not dropping everything to baby me. Let's be real, Jimin is going to tough it through anything and that is his choice. Also, let's be logical, if Jimin really needed a break, he could fully tell the staff he needed a minute and disappeared. But he chose to stay in full view of the cameras.

Maybe he was annoyed Jungkook and V shot him with water guns while he was resting. Maybe he didn't care. He did laugh after it, but he also tried to get them back. Maybe V and Jungkook didn't realize fully hoe he was feeling. Were V and Jungkook being mean in this situation? No. Have you seen them? They goof around in the weirdest ways and they sure as hell showed concern when Jimin's lip was bleeding. (Also, doesn't hurt to point out that when Jimin really went to sleep they left him alone).

Did Jimin seem annoyed or bothered when they went to the adventure park? Not to me. But the point is (I'm yapping, I know) the way the members treat each other is up to each other. Just because it bothered you does not mean it bothered Jimin. And we would never know unless if he told us because that is not our business.

TLDR: They are adults with what I have to assume are healthy boundaries and respect. Playing around with each other is normal and may look harsh to you but clearly works for them. I'm inclined to believe Jikook are in love but who knows what that means for them. Touch grass.

[boobilby]

I didn’t want to draw anything more complicated than red spaghetti

[royalarchivist]

In case you missed it, Jaiden just uploaded a new video! Congrats to her for 10 years of beautiful, funny, and heartfelt storytime animations!

[beevean]

So there was a pretty cringe interview with the author of delicious in dungeon, and out of the deluge of really insensitive questions she provided this incredible quote which I think should sit framed above the writing desk of every single creative individual in the industry

Link here for anyone interested:

I'll be honest, I only read snippets of that interview, but I was honestly disgusted at the fandom's reaction to her saying "Laios is just a normal guy" - basically to insist that if she thinks he is normal and relates to him, then she too is autistic and doesn't know it.

Bro. You don't have the authority to apply headcanons on real people, especially people you only know from interviews and their work. You are being incredibly rude. Laios is certainly quirky, to say the least, and you are allowed to snicker a little at her insistence that he's just an everyman fr fr, but don't get so entrenched in your fanon that you cross boundaries into basically saying "haha we know better than the writer herself :) in fact we know more about herself than she knows :)"

I guess this relates with the quote you put. Kui, like other mangakas, leave to their readers freedom of interpretation, but they have their own plans and ideas and they're sticking to them. Kui probably didn't mean to write an autistic character, but she's leaving to the fandom the choice to see him as such and relate to him that way - which is what she said she intended them to do!

And about Farcille, ngl, had she canonized it purely because it's the flagship of the fandom, she might have risked a Bumbleby/Whispangle situation, where the two become unseparable from each other. It's good that Marcille and Falin are allowed to be their own different people, but with a strong relationship - actually more flawed than usually conceived, although seen mostly in side material (Marcille's adherence to gender norms that Falin doesn't care about). So yeah, hers is a good approach.

[my-name-is-boneless]

They're serving your honor

[nevarroes]

Sorry if its rude to ask but could you do a lil POV doodle of Casim fat shaming his audience? If no thats fine, im just rlly down bad lmaoo

yeah sure but I got a little sidetracked🙏

[vaspider]

Being neutral about genocide isn’t the take you think it is bestie

1) You're not my bestie. You are a creepy, creepy stranger. This is the second weird, presumptive, and invasive ask you've sent me within 24 hours without ever speaking to me before. This is peak parasocial garbage behavior. This will be the last ask you ever send me, though, because I'm blocking you. Do not ever contact me again.

2) Mistaking "I don't perform Good Jew on demand on social media" for inaction or neutrality is a particular Extremely Online Leftist brain rot. Please dig it out of your brain as quickly as possible.

I will not dance for people on demand. If you think that me not saying exactly what you think I should say in exactly the way you think I should say it when you think I should say it in the places you think I should say it means that I think or feel or am doing a particular thing all the time, that's your fucking problem, not mine.

Go read up on Maimonides and leave me the fuck alone.