#other in more equal and genuinely constructive terms

[cacaitos]

only respect for the girlies and their devotion to images and ideals and their ego-destroying sisyphean pursuits.

[msunitedstatesjames]

I've touched on this in a couple of other semi-related posts before, but I find it hilarious and I appreciate how much Johanna Hezenkoss thinks Emmrich is the protagonist of Veilguard. Like, this woman could not give less of a fuck about Rook. She almost always refers to Rook only by their relationship to Emmrich. She refers to Rook as "one of Volkarin's hangers-on," "that impudent whelp following [Emmrich] around," "Volkarin's companion," and as Emmrich's "paramour." None of these imply that she thinks Rook has much agency. Instead, she acts like Rook is just helplessly following Emmrich around like a puppy, helping him complete tasks (which I guess is partly true).

If Rook romances Emmrich, Hezenkoss assumes that Emmrich seduced Rook and not the other way around, even though Emmrich is noticeably older than Rook and has hardly left the Necropolis in years. She's seemingly amazed by it, and yet it never once crosses her mind that Rook might have initiated the relationship (which is actually the case).

She also refers to Emmrich as the one who destroyed her construct, which is technically true, but she ignores the major assistance he had from Rook, another companion, and most notably Manfred. He couldn't have pulled it off without their help, and had in fact given up, but Hezenkoss acts like Emmrich was her sole opponent in that battle.

I've said before that part of the reason for this is that Hezenkoss seems to think of herself as the main villain of the story, so Emmrich must be the main hero. Hezenkoss says that some of the other big bads of Dragon Age, the Venatori, were nothing more to her than slightly useful and genuinely annoying. She clearly thinks herself above an entire organization of some of the most powerful mages in the world. And she sees Emmrich as pretty close to her in terms of raw power, since she almost invited him to her Vengeance Party but ultimately decided he was too much of a danger to her plans. She also states that she tried to get him to join her in the past, which I don't think she would do for anyone she considered to be less than her equal. Emmrich is genuinely the only person in the game she shows any respect for. Though she mocks his age and finds him to be too sentimental, too moral, and too fearful, she shows signs of agreeing with him on some topics, and she obviously respects his abilities if nothing else. No one else in the game acknowledges his frankly ridiculous knowledge and skill level (except Solas in the end) as much as Hezenkoss does.

And really, Emmrich does have main character energy. Though he does have some age and mortality related fears, dude is overflowing with confidence. When you first meet him, looking for a Fade expert, he has absolutely no problem telling you he's the best possible person for the job. Though he apparently hasn't left the Necropolis in years, he's totally down to join the team and go anywhere you want him to go. If you romance him, he is initially surprised, but he quickly turns into the smoothest dude around, and throughout the game you can hear him comment on some of his many relationships through the years. He's well-dressed, well-spoken, charismatic, highly educated, unfailingly kind, extremely powerful, and he's done so well for himself that Harding mistakes the son of a butcher and a cook for a member of the Nevarran nobility. No wonder Hezenkoss thinks he's the protagonist. The real protagonist is just out here winging it on guts and good luck alone.

[ozzgin]

Also I love your blogs sorry I’ve been spamming 🩷Hii Author, could you do another part for the small prehistoric reader, where she is actually really strong even though she’s small and innocent looking like stronger than Yujiro and Baki but she’s only really like that when she’s in heat. I wonder how the would react Yk 🤔

Sure! It’s been suggested in the comments as well and it does have a fun twist to it. Female characters stronger than the main cast is the one uncanonical construct that I deeply enjoy.

Baki Characters x Prehistoric! Small Reader Headcanons (II)

Featuring the Baki characters and a prehistoric but small sized reader that turns out to be unexpectedly strong.

[Baki Masterlist] [Part I]

The fighters keep a respectable distance from you in order to assure Pickle of your safety. They’d rather not pose as a threat to his mate, especially after seeing how protective he can get. He always keeps you under his watchful gaze, ready to interfere if you need to make use of his strength. At times he’s particularly anxious around you. Professor Payne has explained in more scientifically appropriate terms that you might be dealing with female specific issues. No one pressed it further.

This peaceful resolve does not sit well with Yuujirou. How very pathetic and boring that everyone concomitantly agreed to mind their own business. He itches for a little bit of action and what better way to rile up the prehistoric warrior than messing with his little protégé? He doesn’t want to risk fighting a half-assed Pickle, he wants the wrath, the readiness to kill. So with arrogant mockery he decides to give you a little nudge in front of everyone. Just a mere push, he does show mercy to weaklings like you. Baki is enraged and the other men join him. Everyone is waiting for Pickle to make his move, though bizarrely enough he just stands there, eyes wise in shock. Yuujirou didn’t expect this lack of reaction.

The Ogre is a man with battle experience and nothing can take him by surprise. It is to be noted, however, that sometimes a trade off for the sake of efficiency has to be made. A rational agent in artificial intelligence may have to take millions of variables into consideration in order to compute the most optimal solution and react to the environment. Realistically speaking, therefore, some less probable events are taken entirely out of the equation. So, for example, the idea that you would attack Yuujirou was not something his body expected to react against. The impact of your small fist was doubled by this element of surprise. His eyes roll back and his large body is thrown at quite the distance, leaving significant damage behind.

There’s a deafening silence that lingers for what seems an eternity. Baki feels a mild discomfort on the walls of his throat and he realizes his mouth has been hanging open for long enough that it almost dried up. Did you…did you just knock his father out with one single hit? He slowly turns his head to the other witnesses, wondering if this is a dream and the others will confirm it. Judging by the equally dumbfounded expressions surrounding him, he suspects fearfully that it is, in fact, something that just happened. Jack feels like he’s been kicked in the crotch. Katsumi is overwhelmed by a certain nostalgia, the nervousness he felt when he was a little child attending the Dojo for the very first time. Retsu purses his lips as a solemn frown creases his features. Tokugawa can feel the beads of sweat gathering in the folds of his wrinkled forehead.

The least impressed of the group is Pickle. Almost as if he expected it to happen, he walks up to you and grabs your shoulders before you can approach Yuujirou’s passed out body. Your face relaxes once again and you look up to him with a genuine smile, as if soothing his worries. You’ll stop here, no worries. You pat his large hands and turn around, prepared to leave the scene.

The frightful question now plagues the fighters within the arena: was Pickle protecting you from them, or has it been the other way round all along?

[nanowrimo]

How to Avoid Token Representation

What's the difference between token representation and authentic representation? NaNo Participant Nayantara discusses token representation and how to avoid doing it in your own writing! The smart Asian character. The sassy Black character. The Gay Best Friend.

Too many stories written today that supposedly have “diverse” casts fall prey to “token representation”: a symbolic effort towards inclusion that gives the appearance of equality, without actually exploring diverse narratives.

Recently in the publishing industry, readers have been calling for more representation within their novels, whether it is the LGBTQ+ community, racially and ethnically diverse readers, people with disabilities, or other marginalised groups of people, and many authors have responded with this easy-way-out tokenism — leaving readers unsatisfied and indignant.

So, what exactly is the difference between token diversity and real representation?

Essentially, tokenism includes a character that checks boxes titled “diversity” in face and name, but does not acknowledge their lived experience.

For example, Cho Chang in the Harry Potter series and Lane Kim in Gilmore Girlsare reduced to harmful stereotypes of their characters (both their names and characteristics) without acknowledging the diverse experiences that East Asian people have. Their Asianness becomes their entire character, yet at the same time, that same Asianness is entirely misunderstood.

In contrast, the recent Oscar-winning film Everything Everywhere All At Once stars East Asian characters whose lives are affected by their race and background. However, they are fully fleshed out characters regardless of it.

As actor, Anna Leong Brophy, said in an interview, she enjoys it when her “Asianness complements a role, but is not the full role.” Real representation acknowledges how someone’s lived experience as a person of colour, queer person, woman, or member of another marginalised community affects their life — but they have genuine feelings, thoughts, and characteristics far beyond simply their race or identity.

The terms “Black dude dies first” and “Bury your gays” are also commonly associated with token representation. Quite self-explanatory, they are tropes in which the cast’s “diverse” characters are killed early, to save the writer from having to explore or acknowledge their experiences.

Not only is this lazy writing that erases diverse narratives, it also creates the subconscious belief that marginalised groups of people have no place in these stories or in commercialised publishing in general. Everyone deserves representation, whether or not the cis-het (cisgender-heterosexual) white reader can relate to the character’s specific cultural experience.

What counts as good representation, then?

Good representation involves any story that includes a diverse cast and follows each of their story lines fully, allowing them to be well-rounded characters that contain depth and get adequate development.

My personal favourite example of this is Leigh Bardugo’s Six of Crows duology, where her cast of six main characters includes Black and Brown people, bisexual and gay people, people from different countries and religions, and people recovering from trauma — all of whom have their own, carefully constructed character arcs that acknowledge their identity, but also give them substance and characteristics far beyond that.

However, this is not to say every story has to be as international — The Poppy War trilogy by R.F. Kuang has a solely East Asian coded cast due to its setting. But even within this, her characters are from different ethnic, religious, and social backgrounds, and each have their own, carefully-constructed character arc extending far beyond their identity on paper.

As you begin writing for Camp NaNoWriMo, ask yourself the following three questions:

Is my cast truly representing the diverse types of people who exist in this world (either real or imagined)?

Are each of these characters individuals beyond simply their ethnicity, sexuality, gender, disability, etc?

Do each of these characters have a fully fleshed out character arc?

You don’t have to be an author from a marginalised or minority background to write characters with diverse experiences. Just make sure to approach each character with empathy and respect, and devote adequate time to research (or to world building, if you’re a fantasy author!)

Good luck, and I know that you are going to absolutely smash your writing goals next month!

Nayantara is an 18 year old student, green tea connoisseur, bookworm, Spotify-playlist-maker, dancer, and writer hoping to study economics and political science at university next year — and hopefully find some time to work on her many unfinished novels in the meantime! Follow her on Instagram @ moonlitsunflowerbooks.

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto from Pexels

[underdark-dreams]

Hello! I would first like to thank you for getting me into the Rolan boat, this arrogant emotionally-constipated (affectionate) wizard has taken over my mind and he is all I think about now.

That being said, I was wondering if you would be able to do a rolan x tav like a few years or even a decade into their relationship? Does settling into Sorcerous Sundries and becoming a better mage make Rolan softer? How is he connecting with the rest of the magic community (I am personallya Rolan and Gale rare books reading club supporter) What would be some of the major long term disagreements in their relationship and how do you think they would work through it? What would this man's ideal 'happily ever after' look like?

Thank you so much!

This was great food for thought! 🖤 Thank you so much!

I kind of want to work on future Rolan x Tav as its own little standalone fic, because that idea is so sweet—but here are some headcanons on that & all these other what-ifs. Apologies that they're a bit jumbled, I can't concentrate when Rolan

Rolan loves his tower! He definitely feels the weight and responsibility of being the new steward for all this collected research and knowledge. But he also loves that he can go through his books and satisfy his curiosity whenever he wants, after so long yearning for someone to teach him and nurture his magic. He learns to do that for himself

I think the big thing that will soften and kind of humble him over the years will be once he accepts that personal growth will never stop. There is not a mystical point X where he could stand and say, did it, I have reached the pinnacle of archwizardry. He learns how to stop rushing forward and enjoy other things in life, most of all his relationship with Tav.

Once all the Absolute business is finally settled, Rolan will definitely want to lock that down. It doesn't need to be a legal marriage per se, but he is extremely committed to the relationship & wants the same from them. If he had his way Tav would have moved in yesterday. He's ready to wake up next to them for the rest of his life. Buys a house in the city right beside his old place where Lia and Cal still live & can't wait to merge his found family with his new family. His happily ever after is being surrounded by the people he loves and watching them thrive, especially when it's because of him. Having the capacity to care for Tav and Cal and Lia makes him incredibly fulfilled.

Some big potential sources of conflict in his and Tav's relationship:

Jealousy and insecurity. Rolan has some deep abandonment issues from his past, so if he ever felt like Tav was straying emotionally or making him jealous on purpose, that would really hurt his trust. Deep down he needs to know they love him, and hear it once a day preferably

Control issues/willfulness. Older brother mode activated. Rolan likes to do things his way and is very stubborn and proud about conceding to others. He does see Tav more as his equal, unlike his little siblings, but it's hard for him to translate that into actions. There will be a lot of fights over any big decisions where he & Tav disagree. Part of working through it would probably mean Rolan confronting why he needs to control things so badly (growing up without much control over anything in his life maybe? Hmm). He would genuinely benefit from therapy & from learning how to translate all his feelings into constructive words. Being with someone who would stand up to him would really benefit Rolan in the long run, though.

In the magical community: He's got a reputation as a rebel amongst the wizarding community, because 1) he's very much self-taught which is pretty unusual, and 2) not everyone approves of how freely he hands out information about the Weave, casting, etc to the curious younglings who visit his tower. Of course he'd never let anyone get into anything too powerful unsupervised, but after his experience with Lorroakan and realizing that this famed so-called archmage was actually just an idiot who stole everything from more powerful mages, he's like. The strict apprentice system can kinda get fucked honestly. He just doesn't agree that the basics of magic should be kept behind lock and key. Becomes a sort of magical literacy advocate. Let the children read

You might be surprised at how patient this man can be with children by the way! Lots of little magical prodigies hanging around Master Rolan's tower whenever he lets them. He'll kind of scowl to intimidate them into behaving themselves, but inside he loves to see curious minds reading and learning. As a primarily self-taught wizard, he also has an excellent grasp of pedagogy and how to describe concepts in a way a beginner would understand. He puts together his own beginner's magical textbook over the years. Holding the first printed copy in his hands is probably one of the proudest moments of career

To Rolan, Gale's reputation definitely precedes him at first—even before the events at the Grove he knew the name Gale of Waterdeep. Rolan is younger and admires Gale's skill a lot, so in the beginning of their professional relationship he's a bit intimidated. But you know Gale, he is friendly and endearing from the get go. Rolan often thinks if he'd had a teacher like Gale in his youth, he could have nurtured his magical skills much earlier.

Definitely, definitely also subscribe to the Rolan/Gale book club! They become kindred spirits in that regard over the years. Gale makes a visit to Rolan's tower to inform him of this fascinating manuscript that has just surfaced in Evereska, and Rolan is like "Really? I thought the Fae destroyed that centuries ago…" and the two of them just sort of wander off in conversation. Not to reappear for hours. Probably plotting like naughty children over a bottle of wine about how they are going to get their hands on the Ancient Forbidden Book without Tav finding out

[seventeendeer]

okay genuinely curious and interested. how can you consider hrt but not know which direction? aren’t bodies dominant in one or the other by default? i looked up if it can be equal in intersex people and struggled to find an answer because google Sucks

intersex people are more varied than you can imagine. biological sex is fluid and determined by a bunch of different mechanisms, not just hormones, so you can easily wind up with a combination of traits that point in all kinds of different directions. not to mention our society's view of what is "male" and what is "female" is intentionally skewed in a way that excludes large portions of the population from being perceived as perisex and cis (think of how Black women are often perceived as more masculine than white women and policed accordingly, for example in sports, because of racism; the popular perception of the gender binary is cultural and constructed, and is not rooted in science at all).

it's like asking if the color wheel isn't mostly "dominant" in either red or blue. sure, there are many hues we've arbitrarily defined as red or blue, and many colors have elements of red or blue or both, but this doesn't take into account how yellow, black and white mix with the others, or how different hues are perceived differently because of cultural norms. indigo and cyan are both called "blue" in english, but they're as far apart as red and pink, and most english-speaking people wouldn't call pink "red." this is comparable to how even perisex women having some amount of facial hair is actually very common, but it's still perceived as "unwomanly", so they have it removed. men can be indigo or cyan and still be blue, but a pink woman needs to be saturated before she is accepted as a proper red. all because of arbitrary shit we made up so we can have a cool little fascism party about it

I don't even know if I technically count as intersex (there's some debate about how far the umbrella term goes and I'm on the margins), but I also don't read as cis perisex to the average person. a combination of mixed secondary sex characteristics and a society that has weird views on the intersection between fatness, disability and gender means I'm perceived as not quite a woman and not quite a man. and I wish I could get HRT to increase the fucking thing in both directions because making the comfortable uncomfortable and the uncomfortable comfortable is exactly how I wanna be :]

[radical-revolution]

Whatever the circumstance. Society is anything.

The teachings of Dzogchen always advise to try to help yourself, to give yourself a helping hand. But how do you do it exactly?

You should seek to be self-aware of your own state always in whatever circumstances you are facing, and if you are overly excited or confused, you should try to relax and give yourself a break. If you're tired, you should rest.

There is no need to follow strict rules, although, as we have said, sometimes they can be quite useful. We must always remember the goal we are striving for - how to live life with a genuine presence of awareness.

In our relationships with society, we should also behave with awareness so that our inner development can truly reach full maturity.

Many political theories encourage people to fight for building a better society. But the path they propose to do so involves the destruction of old society, in particular, through revolution.

However, in practice, the benefits of such means are always relative and temporary, and genuine equality between the layers of society can never be achieved.

The truth is that a better society will emerge only through the evolution of an individual. After all, society consists of millions of people. To make it to a million, you have to start with one, which means you have to begin with an individual, and only that can start any real change.

Hence, it is not at all that you need to be selfish and put yourself first - understanding your own experiences, you need to come to an understanding of the state of all humanity.

Guided by this experience, we are able to show awareness in any situation and in any social structure.

You need to be able to handle your situation and others according to the circumstances we may encounter without bias and deception.

Thus, in order to learn to practice Dzogchen, you need to observe yourself. To do this, it's enough to pay a few minutes to notice how, like emerging and disappearing waves, our thoughts, assessments and perceptions come and go.

The characteristic of our mind is that every thought can serve as a secondary reason for some action. Therefore, if we show awareness and presence towards all aspects of being in our lives, we will certainly have fewer problems.

It is much more important to try to be present and aware at all times than to devote a limited amount of time each day to a specific practice.

Perfect knowledge of the methods of meditation, visualization, etc. д. - a secondary matter. In Dzogchen, there is a saying: "The main thing is not meditation, but knowledge," and indeed, without such knowledge, meditation becomes a mental construct, an unnecessary construct.

Where does true knowledge come from? It arises from awareness on a relative level which serves as a concrete basis for understanding meditation and the nature of the mind. Very often, the phrase "nature of mind" remains only beautiful, enchanting words, but the trouble is that people do not understand their true meaning. If we do not really live in the nature of the mind, then we only have a imagination of it, and although we can talk and think about it, all of this has absolutely nothing to do with reality. For example, if we are hungry, we will not be satiated with reasonings such as: “To eat or not to eat is the same” or: “There is no such thing as food on the natural level of the mind.” It is better to understand your material situation as it is.

“The nature of mind” is a term that refers to a state that lies beyond the existence of body, speech, and mind, and knowledge can only arise during experience. Knowing the limitations and signs of a relative condition, one can truly realize their true nature.

~ Chogyal Namkay Norbu Rinpoche

[fated-normal-767]

Do you think theproject takes place in like . A country with a high property value . Is it well known ? Does it have good food and . Well I know for a fact it does not have low crime rates but . Can it make up for that ? Is it scenic ? What’s the culture like y’know ?

okay hang on I’m going to make a couple of maps for the first time ever because I really want to answer this properly. So I’m going to start with weather and temperature and location. This is not canon because I blatantly refuse to place it anywhere on the world map so I don’t have to talk about geo political relationships and fucking science of how it’s there or whatever, I failed geography, but it is somewhere in this area, not in the middle of the ocean, but closer to one or another landmass. So similar weather to either the uk or parts of America, probably closer to America as it’s referenced as being quite easy to travel to. No one ever talks about Britain but then neither would I if I had a choice so that indicates nothing.

It’s probably slightly warmer than the uk but it has thunderstorms and rain quite frequently and I’d guess it’s equal to or smaller than Britain in terms of land. However characters can travel around frequently because there’s good public transportation. I drew a map but I really really hate it so much I just needed to create the idea of the layout. I hate drawing maps.

There are roads and train lines and the like not pictured because I couldn’t be bothered but You Get It, vaguely. It’s completely an island so the views of the sea are probably very nice and I think before skills were a thing they weren’t really known for anything, so initially a low population density, and probably still pretty affordable property. Not cheap but like. Better. Nice place generally. We see the worst of it because that’s how you get a good story but it’s not that bad it’s genuinely Quite Good, you know? Free healthcare, pretty good housing opportunities, good few jobs in law or offices or journalism due to all the things to report on. I think a lot of the people there, if not the majority, moved there after it improved once skills started benefiting work in healthcare and sciences and stuff. Big governments probably delayed looking into that for ages in case it backfired or messed stuff up somehow, but small place, not hugely complex system? Just jumped straight in and it worked. It also has some of the loosest regulations on powerful or hard to control skills so I’d think there’s people from all over going there. It’s probably very much like the more boring parts of America and some bits of the USA but . It’s one of the safer places if you get what I mean. There’s some very crucially bad things but if you remove those niche defects from the picture it’s actually. A really good place.

I don’t know if it has a comparatively high crime rate actually. Maybe because it’s a small place with one or two very dedicated criminals but . Generally there is less crime than would be in any other places if they were shrunk down to that size. Or at least an even amount. Once again, we see the worst of it. And everyone still keeps living mainly happily. Considering it’s an island I imagine they have a good amount of seafood but in my mind there’s also a channel tunnel type construction that means it’s not difficult to either travel or import wider ranges of food. Probably a lot like America but I’m betting there’s like . super niche cafes and restaurants around for a variety of things. There’s good food because if I made all this world building just to give them shit food I’d have to kill myself. I would go more into what seafood they have but I honestly don’t like seafood much so I only really know 2 or 3 seafood dishes and I definitely couldn’t accurately profile what would be most popular. It’s definitely scenic I think it’s quite high above sea level in places especially near the city of cliffs so it’s. Honestly probably beautiful.

[thetypedwriter]

Fourth Wing Book Review

Fourth Wing Book Review by Rebecca Yarros 

This book is incredibly popular. Unbelievably popular, actually. We’re talking about Colleen Hoover levels of popularity. On the one hand, I get it, I truly do. On the other hand, I think this book is beyond basic and shouldn’t be garnering the attention it currently is. 

Yarros’ novel is set in a fantasy world with typical mythical names like Navarre and Tyrrendor where dragons and magic and a never-ending war exists. In terms of a fantasy world, nothing about Yarros’ universe is astonishing, interesting, or even remotely novel.

While this sounds incredibly harsh, it’s actually very smart from a marketing perspective and only adds to the book’s high demand because while it’s a fantasy world and therefore intriguing, nothing about it is very unique or complex��allowing new and old readers alike to delve in without stressing about the world and its intricacies. Instead, readers can focus almost exclusively on the action and romance, two things this book has in droves. 

So while the fantasy setting allows for high stakes intensity, fighting, and dragons, dragons, and more dragons, nothing about it is complicated or even very important.

How does the magic system work? Some vague explanation of wards and that’s about it. Why is there a war? Don’t worry about it. Why was there a rebellion? You don’t need to know the intricacies of the whys and hows, only that the children of the traitors are alive and intermingling with the rest of the citizens, increasing tension. 

However, as I mentioned above, while the setting is mundane it does allow Yarros to submerge her chapters in action and intrigue without much of a break. This is one of the main reasons why I think Fourth Wing is topping the bestseller’s list: it is constantly entertaining.

All of us have short attention spans these days, and Fourth Wing fills the gaping need to be consistently amused and engaged at all times, which Yarros delivers upon brilliantly. Every chapter contains some fight, life-or-death situation, a competition, someone trying to murder the main character, a break in, a break out, or a sex scene. That would account for 90% of all chapters in Fourth Wing. 

That being said, it’s not necessarily a criticism. People obviously love the constant action and it keeps the book engaging and fluid. While I can recognize that Yarros is writing to fulfill a societal need and that constructing multiple chapters of action is genuinely difficult, it’s also not my favorite thing.

I have said time and time again that I’m a character driven reader. I would say the equation for Fourth Wing is 80% action and 20% character interaction. Personally, I would prefer a more equal distribution of action to character progression and growth, but I also recognize that’s a me problem. 

In terms of Yarros’ characters, they are…meh. I think they’re extremely basic, but once again, I’m not surprised why people are foaming at the mouth for their story. The main character is Violet, nicknamed Violence, and she is the epitome of a perfect character. She’s extremely intelligent, generous, kind, brave, determined, stubborn, and sexy. You name it and she’s got it.

Her only “weakness” is literally that: she has a “weak” body. However, this weakness barely matters as she often overcomes it without any problem whatsoever. Yarros does have some descriptions of Violet wrapping her knee or being at a disadvantage physically during fights, but by the end of the book Violet is a certified badass who can take down anyone. 

Violet’s “flaw”, if you can even call it that, doesn’t make her a more interesting character. It makes things infinitesimally more challenging for her and attracts some enemies, but she already has enemies because of her mother’s high status.

Other than this physical burden, Violet is literally perfect. There is nothing wrong with her, which makes her extremely boring and hard to relate to. I want complex human beings that have strengths and weaknesses, not unimaginable goddesses with brittle bones. 

The only other character of importance, Xaden, is also the epitome of hot and flawless. He’s sexy, handsome, brooding, smart, and crazy talented. His only so-called detriment is that he can be a bit closed off and reticent, but that’s it.

He’s shouldering the lives of over a hundred orphans and can do no wrong. He’s also the hottest, the strongest physically, the most popular, and the most talented because of course he is. 

Both Xaden and Violet also have two most powerful dragons that exist and their dragons are a mated pair, meaning that Violet and Xaden are inextricably tied together for life.

In addition to this, they have the rarest signets (magical powers) consisting of wielding shadows and controlling lightning, the likes which haven’t been seen in ages. Sigh. 

I hate it so much. I’m so sick and tired of the trope of the main character being the strongest and most beautiful and then falling for the hottest and strongest guy who’s slightly cold, but actually the world’s best person.

The fact that they have the strongest dragons and the most powerful abilities also irks me. It’s not interesting. I predicted it from a mile away. Do something different, something better. But no, that’s not what we get in Fourth Wing. 

You could argue that it was surprising that Violet bonds with two dragons, but think about it. Is it really? Also, I think Andarna plays no role other than to make Violet even more saint-like than she is. The other characters in Fourth Wing don’t matter. I make this statement often, but it could not ring more true for Fourth Wing. 

Yarros throws so many characters at you and yet nothing about them sticks. Other than Xaden, and arguably Liam, Rhiannon, and Dain, no characters have any depth, nuance, or significance. In a book as large as Fourth Wing I find that hugely disappointing.

Even Liam, Rhiannon, and Dain are all one-dimensional characters at best. Some people tout that the relationship between Dain and Violet is interesting, but I don’t think it is at all. It is clear from the first chapter that Xaden is her game-end and Dain becomes increasingly aggravating and villainized as the book goes on. 

Something else that Yarros does with her characters is make them very black-and-white. They’re either angels capable of doing no wrong or the most vehement villains to walk the planet. This opposition is incredibly boring and didn’t fuel my interest in any of the characters. 

Fourth Wing’s plot, which I haven’t spoke much about yet, essentially follows the simple idea that Violet is meant to be a scribe, became a rider instead due to her mother’s negligent insistence, avoids being murdered while going to classes and participating in nonsensical competitions, and falls in love with Xaden Riorson.

That’s it. That’s the whole plot. 

Multiple elements of the narrative also make no sense. For example, you're telling me that the youngest, most athletic, most talented people of your nation are being slaughtered for arbitrary reasons?

It makes zero sense. Riders are simply allowed to kill each other during fighting practice and during competitions. Think about that for one second in a logistical lens and realize how ludicrous that is as a nation.

The only reason Yarros puts it into her novel is because it's edgy and increases tension but it's genuinely really stupid.

There’s some heavy action at the end with Violet throwing lightning left and right after being betrayed. Except the betrayal can barely even be defined as such and is probably only happening because Yarros is trying to keep tension up. Maybe she thinks readers will get bored if Xaden and Violet are simply together and in love.

I’ll never understand why authors do this. We want to see them together. Let me see them navigate a relationship and the pitfalls that come with that. I don’t need some bullshit reason for them not to be together when everyone knows they’ll eventually reconcile and get back together anyway. Urgh. 

Fourth Wing has a lot of elements that I find banal and that bother me, but as I also stated, it was highly entertaining at all moments. For this reason, I didn’t hate Fourth Wing. It does sort of blow my mind that this is the book that is being swept off shelves and beginning a cultural phenomenon, because at its core, I think it’s generic in almost every way.

However, maybe that’s what people want. Perhaps people want a simple fantasy with hot enemies-to-lovers moments and overpowered characters.

The end. 

I just want something better. 

Recommendation: If you want a watered down version of Game of Thrones and have been craving some alluring enemies-to-lovers moments with constant dragon-centered action thrown in, then Fourth Wing is a gold mine.

If you want something better than a generic fantasy with perfect main characters, a stereotypical universe, and a cliched plotline then avoid Fourth Wing. Not everything popular is worth the hype. 

Score: 6/10

[tonydaddingham]

LWA: That conspiracist "magic trick" document is...that's why I rarely interact with fandom spaces. S2 does indeed have a bunch of problems, a lot of which have to do with the material conditions of production and some of which are endemic to the source material. S1 was not a well-plotted or well-paced show, because the /novel/ is not well-plotted or well-paced. S2 didn't have enough material to justify six episodes, and only the Job minisode justified its length in terms of either character's characterization. Etc. Both seasons are flawed scripts saved by the leads.

The other problem here is that Gaiman has transformed a single season into a trilogy, and if there are going to be narrative payoffs we don't see them yet; it's as if PRIDE AND PREJUDICE ended with Lizzie Bennet rejecting Darcy's first proposal (which is, after all, what we got, except that Aziraphale and Crowley are both Darcy and Lizzie simultaneously). In an incomplete trilogy, there just isn't sufficient evidence to understand whether the author has missed a trick or if they're setting up a third-act resolution. For example, take Crowley's proposal, which insists that he and Aziraphale have spent their "existence" denying that they're a team. I know everyone got hung up on Tennant's intense delivery, which is great, but Crowley's narrative of their friendship in S1 ("How long have we been friends? Six thousand years!") doesn't track with anything dramatized for us on the screen, and neither does this. Is this another "Crowley is an unreliable narrator" problem, as Gaiman has confirmed he is about the Fall, retroactively constructing an emotional bond that neither character felt? OK, if so, what's the underlying narrative argument motivating this behavior? Or do Gaiman and Finnemore think that that's what the series is actually dramatizing?

Here's what I mean. In S1, there's nothing to indicate (in the script, the actors' performances, or even the score) that they have a genuine, mutual emotional connection until 1601, some centuries post-Arrangement, which is the first time that Aziraphale expresses concern for Crowley's safety and also the first time we see him successfully break out the puppy eyes. (Post S2, it's now "expresses concern for Crowley's safety as a demon.") Before that, they have unequal and fleeting moments of connection: Aziraphale is more interested in Crowley during Creation than vice-versa. Crowley is charmed by Aziraphale in Eden and pleased to see him again at the Flood, but he is guarded or hostile when they meet at the Crucifixion and again in Rome. S2 now adds that he isn't all that excited to see Aziraphale again during Job, either, although Aziraphale comes across as quite chipper about the run-in. Aziraphale is equally guarded at the Crucifixion, excited to see Crowley in Rome, and then mildly annoyed about running into him during the Arthurian period (and it's apparently still canon that the Arrangement won't begin until a few centuries later). In 1793, they've become attached enough that they've started the damsel-in-distress game, and in 1827 Crowley invites Aziraphale to Edinburgh for fun, suggesting that they are now actual friends and not just doing transactional job swaps. But in 1862 Aziraphale is cold again for reasons not explained by the 1827 minisode. (As an aside, S2 Aziraphale is just mirroring S1 Crowley in asking for big things--Crowley requests collaboration, a celestial nuke, treason, and child murder, all but one of which he gets, and the last not for lack of trying--and /Aziraphale/ is the only character making inappropriate requests for help?!) 1862 is the first time we see them seriously miscommunicating, as opposed to arguing--Crowley's approach to his request is bad and Aziraphale overreacts equally badly. And then we are shown that the emotional stakes of their relationship intensify after they reunite in 1941, when all the gazing and romantic music tell us that Aziraphale has fallen in love. Given that the script makes clear that Aziraphale and Crowley are having the same conversation in 1967 that they were in 1862, and Aziraphale still believes he's handing Crowley a suicide pill, Aziraphale's decision to yeet himself out of the car immediately when Crowley tries to ramp things up again is probably the /least/ codependent thing either character manages post-1941 in the first two seasons.

The fanon narrative in which they've been mutually pining for six millennia uncritically tracks Crowley's story, but it doesn't track the script. They /aren't/ a team or even especially attached until the Arrangement kicks in, and the first in-script signs of the codependency that will cause them to implode in S2 don't show up until the end of the eighteenth century. (In the novel, Aziraphale doesn't even understand that he genuinely /likes/ Crowley until they're thwarting Armageddon!) These are two characters who canonically get along just fine without seeing each other for years, decades, centuries, or millennia! But without the third part of the trilogy, there's no final evidence about how we should view Crowley's approach to relationship story-telling, let alone how we should judge whatever Gaiman (and Finnemore) are doing.

HI LWA✨!!!!!!

i mean first off, in general response to the entire thing:

i joke, but what you've said does really highlight, i think, a key detail that the fandom (including myself) get carried away with; that if we were to watch the show specifically with brand new eyes, without any influence of a surrounding fandom that has existed for the last six years (or 33, paying the book due consideration), the relationship between crowley and aziraphale would be regarded very differently.

but first re: Magic Trick Theory. i felt really bad for saying it at the time, but i was so full-body convinced that eps 1 and 2 were fake following the screening because they felt weird. i genuinely couldn't understand why people were saying what they were (obviously there were great moments, no questioning that), because all i could feel was a sense of unease. and that's not even because it didn't follow the tone of s1 (which i loved for its delicate balance of being the most ludicrous, dry-funny story with undertones of serious philosophy and subtle complexity), but because it felt like someone had taken a section of the story and stretched it out so forcefully across a frame that was too big for it.

i won't list off any particular issues i had for fear of causing offense, because my rather insignificant opinion is genuinely not intended as a means to shit on s2, but once i let go of the notion that this season was meant to do anything other than set up s3, have a couple of silly (but still potentially Important for s3) subplots, and just be a fun and wild ride in developing aziraphale and crowley as characters, i began to enjoy it. that was entirely to do with me and my expectations, because neil never really told us to expect otherwise. in any case, for me, this feeling kicked in around ten minutes into ep3; let go of expectations and just went along for the ride.

with the benefits of hindsight, i don't think that s2 was badly written; it was still subtly nuanced and clever, but just in a very different way to s1. it still asked questions. it still questioned the black, white, and in-between. it still had the undertones of a fairly cohesive plot. production quality, given the state the industry was in when filmed, was really commendable and honestly astounded me given the limitations that were in place at the time. david and michael's respective performances were amazing, there's no doubt, but i don't think they necessarily saved it, because in many respects i don't think it needed saving.

yes, there were flaws, but altogether it was a very enjoyable season. and whilst i realise that some people understandably watch shows for plot and thematic intricacy, artistic direction, particular acting set pieces, or anything that gives Depth (myself included on some shows), i just liked it simply because it entertained me. it made me laugh, cry, angry, bemused - whatever emotion you can think of, i can probably tell you a time during that fateful Friday morning (clutching my fourth coffee that night, having driven the m5 for a horrendously inappropriate amount of time, and in my 16-22nd hour of being awake - just setting the scene) where i felt it. i just enjoyed the ride.

(and by the by, still personally think the screenings were a mistake - fun, exciting, and communal in spirit, but a mistake)

but this brings me to the Theory. im sure this comes to noones surprise, but i love speculating. it's fun, it's self-rewarding, and frankly just helps my head Quieten Down a little. a form of self-care, if you like. i like that it's possible to look at the same scene, episode, season, and interpret it differently. to think that a character does something for one reason, but also for another, or that the plot could go this way, or it could go that way. ive personally tried to stay away from speculating based on anything but what the story has shown to us so far. yes, sometimes i joke that "haha, neil would definitely bait and switch us" etc etc., but ultimately im not the authority on what he will and won't do, and i don't try to assume that i have spotted an ulterior motive other than what has been shown to us in the show/book.

so when it came to the Theory, i loved the parts that referenced the show itself; because the interpretation and presentation of such was really well speculated. it has references, clearly had a lot of knowledge and research behind it, was eloquent and well-reasoned (however inaccurate it may turn out to be), and honestly was intimidating - in a good, awe-inspiring, jealous-of-their-intelligence way - in the depth of dedication the author had to writing it. but as i remarked in an ask from someone (@swansdreaming shout out!✨) that asked for my thoughts on it, the only real reaction i could give as to how valid i found it was that it was "A Lot".

s2 ended narratively on a problem (well, a couple of them), so it's not bold to assume that they will be largely resolved in s3. what i think was bold however is to be embroiled in how odd s2 was that there has to be a higher purpose for it narratively. i think a season can be written perhaps a smidge weaker just because it was, with no lofty reason as to why. it's entirely possible - as i got over myself - to just sit back and enjoy it for what is put in front of you, and not think much more than that in terms of the technicality of the show... just relax and trust that the loopholes, or the armoury chock-full of chekhov's guns will be explained. speculate about the future of the plot in terms of the material itself put in front of you? yes, cool. but justify the plot by way of "there's no possible way that the script/writing could be flawed?" - whilst a commendable notion and likely rooted in admiration, i think that's potentially a little audacious and even a little bit of unnecessary glorification.

but let's talk about the relationship itself. again, controversial and brave, and yet so inescapably true. i definitely think there is Something There right from the beginning, but my god, it is not love. curiosity and fascination, absolutely (to varying degrees). attraction and tension (in any form), i daresay so. but it's not love, not even friendship - frankly it's barely even respect. we see flashes of potential friendship and respect:

crowley's reaction to aziraphale giving away his sword and aziraphale being grateful for his platitude on his choice to do so

aziraphale lying to the archangels in job, and aziraphale's reaction to crowley's constant attempts to show job and his family mercy

aziraphale offering crowley dinner in rome, and crowley's stunned/amused reaction to "let me tempt you"

their mutual bemoaning about their respective roles during arthurian albion, and agreement that the weather is pretty miserable (incidentally but irrelevant - my favourite funny line from s1 is michael's damp comment, gets me each time).

but even then, all of these are rooted in other things too, if not in actual fact; the main one that immediately springs to my mind is self-interest. the overall tones of these scenes are not very warm, barely even tepid; they are just two supernatural beings, alone in their experience of being so and being on earth amongst humans (who do many problematic things that seem to confound them slightly which - fair), and relating to each other as a result. but there's not much else to it, to their relationship, when you step back and look at it as the big picture. as i said, other than a couple of lines, there's little if any genuine connection beyond relatability - and even then that's questionable.

edit bc important: reexamining crowley's line in the coffee shop re: "you only ever call me for three reasons...", this indicates that he's aware that aziraphale only contacts him out of self-interest which... whilst i think is slightly derivative to suggest at this point, it is also true and aziraphale doesn't negate it. whether crowley says this as a reflection on himself for not being worth aziraphale's time, or as a reflection on aziraphale himself (both?) is almost immaterial - but he is able to admit to himself that their relationship might not be as rooted in love and partnership as he would otherwise like to think.

the one thing i do think is correct is that they have been in a six-millennia-long dance, circling each other and mirroring each other, a constant give and take.. and aside from its overt parallels to jane austen/regency aesthetic, that's why i particularly like that the dancing in s2 was the dance it was - a quadrille (?) instead of any 1-1 dancing in the time period like a waltz was such a great reflection of this... mirroring each other in their sways and swings, circling each other, drawing together and retreating, and the occasional brush with each other (hands)... it was just so symbolically appropriate to represent this symbiosis they have been cultivating for millennia, rather than them be represented as fully cohesive together in the form of a partnered ballroom dance... incredible. and completely - once again - set up the dilemma for the Feral Domestic in ep6.

i realised this earlier today (i don't want to admit what number rewatch im on but i feel like i could get s3 greenlit singlehandedly at this point), but when i ruminated what feels like eons ago on aziraphale's tendency to place crowley on a pedestal? yeah, once again the mirroring theme continues. these two have such idealistic images of each other built in their heads, and to me (without going off for the thousandth time in Detail) it's aziraphale that starts to re-examine that image in s1 and 2.

to me, he starts to consider that actually his image of crowley was not true to reality, but still found that he loved the Real Crowley even more. but crowley ends up destroying that image entirely by the end of ep6 with his 'i love you but not that part/s, and so fuck it, "no nightingales""... i don't know if that was the intention of the script/narrative, but it's certainly how it looked to me - that aziraphale was almost fully accepting of who crowley was (bearing in he doesn't have the facts - *sideeye*).

crowley's image of aziraphale however is so inaccurate and, as with just about everything that is crowley and his story, he doesn't like or want to hear or accept the truth if it doesn't suit him. run away together? aziraphale is practically the shaking-chihuahua antithesis of running away from things. reject heaven because they're toxic? yes, but it won't change unless they perhaps try to change it themselves. we could have been us? aziraphale was literally offering this to you, and a chance (as aziraphale genuinely believes at that time, naivety notwithstanding) to actually be free and safe in being so. whether crowley clings to this narrative out of loneliness, a hope of true redemption, stubborn pig-headedness, or a combination of these and others besides, he really set himself up for disaster.

aziraphale has his hand in the issue too, there's no doubt - he's pretty incompetent about seeing things truly outside of his own comfy little world (bookshop or in his head, either works), and doesn't make any overt measures to try to infer and understand the things that are left Unsaid. whilst crowley is keeping things from him and hiding behind a mask, aziraphale by all accounts is a smart guy, and even without the full facts you'd think he'd at least be able to surmise why crowley cannot say yes to restoration... or maybe he does, but by the point that he's caught up enough to understand, crowley already lit the touchpaper and aziraphale retreats in his own hurt and sense of rejection.

the fact of the matter is that these characters, for having known each other for so long (in varying degrees of intimacy, granted), just do not know the first thing about what their respective cores are. it's very easy to focus on the star-crossed lovers element of the story (including myself in that number) and hyper-romanticise that aspect, than actually recognise the constant, problematic miscommunication and subsequent misunderstanding that - the way it's currently going - is going to lead them straight to their demise.

[jacquelinemerritt]

Dragon Ball Z: Abridged Episode 59 Review

Originally posted September 13th, 2018

Awful parenting meets great storytelling.

Goku is an awful parent.

Up until now, that idea has been present in Dragonball Z: Abridged mostly as subtext, with it being most blatant in the way Gohan reacts whenever he has been forced to think about his relationship with his father, but here, in The Hard Cell, that subtext is made into explicit text, as Piccolo speaks out in righteous fury as Goku sends his son in to fight Cell, and then gives Cell a Senzu bean in order to give Gohan a fair fight.

I knew this was coming, as it’s one of the few moments in Dragonball that is so famous I couldn’t avoid having it spoiled, but even having it spoiled, the sheer shock of Goku’s recklessness and lack of care for his son was downright paralyzing when I first saw it, with the only relief being hearing Piccolo criticize Goku for his absolutely horrendous decision making and logic.

This is, without any doubt, an act of child abuse, and that reality is acknowledged here not only by Piccolo, who is even more furious with Goku in the abridged version than he was in the original (and he was downright pissed there), but also by the entire world around Goku, as Jimmy Firecracker publicly lambasts Goku for sending his son into a battle he himself was already losing, and Chi Chi madly picks up her TV and swings it around the room in a fit of blinding and justified rage.

That moment is pivotal, and thanks to Team Four Star’s stellar editing, voice-work, and writing, it feels exactly like the betrayal it is meant to be, with Goku’s decision to heal Cell using a Senzu bean coming off as particularly awful, since we hear Gohan’s thoughts just before as he realizes that he might have a chance against Cell. We even see that Goku’s plan is a complete failure, as Cell closes out the episode by wailing on Gohan, who lies caught by Cell’s attacks, being beaten to a pulp.

Without a doubt, Goku’s betrayal of Gohan here is the most important part of the episode, but the way it’s built to is equally compelling. This episode starts with Cell and Goku finally stepping up their game and beginning to actually fight each other, with Cell’s own obsession with Goku driving him to destroy his meticulously constructed arena, not realizing that Goku is far more interested in a casual fight than anything so grand and long-term as Cell dreamed.

It’s ironic, hilarious, and compelling to see their mutual attraction capped off like this, and it fits perfectly with Cell’s already obsessive behavior for him to want more than from this relationship than Goku, who has always been similarly non-committal, as we saw when he abandoned Freeza the moment he got bored.

There is a perfect balance maintained here that makes it absolutely satisfying to see Cell disappointed by Goku, while still feeling completely betrayed when Goku throws his son to the wolves, and yet even more compelling than that is the strange faith the Goku has in Gohan. As bad a parent as Goku is, he is about as far from being insincere about anything as you can get with a character, and for all the horror that throwing an 11-year old against a murderous monster is, you can’t deny that Goku genuinely believes in the capabilities of his son.

Goku’s actions here are objectively pretty horrendous, and the narrative does everything to reinforce that, but even with all of that going against him, the sheer faith Goku has in his son leaves us with a sense of hope that somehow, someway, Gohan is going to pull through against Cell.

A fool’s hope, to be sure, but a necessary bit of hope indeed.

Rating: 4.5/5

Stray Observations

As dark of a joke as it is, it feels entirely in character for Master Roshi to be in the sex-offender registry, and his reluctant acknowledgement of that throws a good bit of shade at Toriyama for unironically embracing Master Roshi’s perverted behavior, and by association, anime’s legitimately awful trend of normalizing pervy characters, especially old men.

Critical Eye Criticism is the work of Jacqueline Merritt, a trans woman, filmmaker, and critic. You can support her continued film criticism addiction on Patreon.

[wolveswatchspace]

How to Spot a High-Quality Replica Watch

In the world of luxury timepieces, high-quality replica watches offer an attractive alternative to genuine models, combining the elegance and prestige of top brands with a more accessible price point. However, not all replicas are created equal, and distinguishing a high-quality replica from a poorly made one can be challenging. Here’s a guide to help you spot a high-quality replica watch and make a smart purchase.

1. Examine the Materials

High-quality replicas use premium materials that closely match those of the original watches. Pay attention to the following:

Case Material: Look for stainless steel, gold plating, or titanium. High-quality replicas will use materials that mimic the original watch, providing durability and a similar weight.

Crystal: Sapphire crystal is preferred for its scratch resistance and clarity. Check if the watch uses sapphire crystal as opposed to cheaper materials like mineral glass or plastic.

Strap/Bracelet: Genuine leather, high-quality rubber, or finely finished metal bracelets indicate a well-made replica. Poor quality replicas often have straps that feel cheap and wear out quickly.

2. Check the Movement

The movement is the heart of any watch. High-quality replicas often use automatic or mechanical movements similar to those found in genuine watches. Here's what to look for:

Smooth Movement: The second hand should move smoothly, without noticeable ticking, particularly in automatic replicas.

Reliable Timekeeping: The watch should keep accurate time. Low-quality movements often result in frequent time adjustments.

3. Pay Attention to Details

High-quality replicas meticulously replicate the details of the original watch. Here are some key aspects to check:

Logo Placement: The logo should be accurately placed and match the original in size and style.

Dial Markers: Ensure that the dial markers are aligned correctly and the fonts match those of the genuine model.

Engravings: Check for clean, precise engravings on the case back, clasp, and other areas. Low-quality replicas often have sloppy or missing engravings.

Date Windows: The date window should be properly aligned and magnified if the original watch has this feature.

4. Weight and Feel

A high-quality replica will have a substantial weight, similar to the original watch. The watch should feel solid and well-constructed when you wear it. Light, flimsy watches are a red flag for poor quality.

5. Research the Seller

The seller’s reputation is crucial when buying a replica watch. Here’s what to consider:

Customer Reviews: Look for reviews and testimonials from other customers to gauge the seller’s reliability and product quality.

Return Policy: Ensure the seller has a clear return policy in case the watch does not meet your expectations.

Customer Support: Reliable sellers offer excellent customer service and clear communication.

At WolvesWatch.com, we pride ourselves on offering high-quality A5 replicas that meet the highest standards of craftsmanship and accuracy. Our dedication to quality and customer satisfaction ensures you get the best value for your money.

6. Compare Prices

While price should not be the sole determinant, extremely low prices often signal low-quality replicas. Compare prices across different sellers to understand the market rate for high-quality replicas.

7. Secure Payment Methods

When purchasing online, ensure the seller uses secure payment methods to protect your financial information. Look for SSL encryption and reputable payment gateways.

Why Choose WolvesWatch.com

At WolvesWatch.com, we specialize in high-quality A5 replicas, ensuring our customers receive the best in terms of materials, craftsmanship, and accuracy. Here’s why you should choose us:

Extensive Selection: We offer a wide range of replicas from top brands like Rolex, Omega, Patek Philippe, and Audemars Piguet.

Quality Assurance: Every watch undergoes rigorous quality control checks to meet our high standards.

Customer Support: Our dedicated customer service team is always ready to assist with any queries or concerns.

Secure Shopping: We prioritize your security with encrypted transactions and secure payment gateways.

Navigating the world of replica watches can be challenging, but with the right knowledge and careful consideration, you can find a high-quality replica that offers the elegance and prestige of luxury timepieces. Start your journey with confidence at WolvesWatch.com and discover a world of affordable luxury.

[vivacissimx]

I genuinely love anything related to ASOIAF world. Still, due to the ongoing drama and harassment I've seen writers experiencing on Tumblr I decided to withdraw myself and protect my peace. Lately, I've been missing it here, but I'm still sceptical about jumping and pursuing writing for the fandom again. Can I ask you how you manage to stay drama-free and have a peaceful blog that I truly enjoy, despite the ongoing situation?

I definitely understand where you are coming from and have been in that position before, where the personalities of the fandom got under my skin. Existing in a community requires a balance that varies from person to person & you alone can know what works for you. What works for me personally is to have a circle, or several circles, of people who enjoy the characters/themes you enjoy. Having people to bitch about fandom with is not this! In my experience, your relationships need to have a positive foundation. And, yknow, these are people who you should show up for when they create things too. You don't have to force yourself to do more than you want to, but engaging with their metas, artwork, fics, headcanons, even just adding a bit in the tags/comments or having an open mind to something you hadn't considered before is a great way to foster good times in fandom! Being positive and generous is the best way to invite positivity and generosity back.

Which is probably the other thing about enjoying fandom-- you should be a creator! When you create and grow and share it'll naturally attract similar energy to you. There are people I've never had a conversation with ever, but they show up in my comments sections sometimes and that alone makes fandom feel like a place where I can connect with other people who nerd out in the same direction as I do. Not only that, but you'll hone a creative skill in ways that surprise and excite you. Learning about writing by writing fic & learning how to read by constructing meta has been hugely rewarding for me. Of course, harassment is a different thing. I have had to moderate my comments or turn off anon at different points. "Don't feed the trolls" is golden advice, in my experience. When they don't get the attention they want, they tend to disappear.

And, because I'm not delusional, I suppose the last thing is to just ignore 99% of the bullshit. It doesn't matter. It'll blow over. It'll start up again. It's a constant cycle. Block liberally. People talk online in ways they never would dare in real life. When you catch yourself getting mad and gearing up to say something, just leave it for 24 hours. Chances are you won't care anymore. That's not me saying to tolerate bullshit, but engage with fandom on your terms and not because you feel cornered by someone else's ridiculous opinion. If I'm really incensed by someone's hot take I will open a new text post and try to formulate a meta about the process of how I came to my (diametrically opposite) conclusion. That's way more productive/effective than engaging in discourse, I've found. On the flip side, if you catch yourself in a weird situation with someone you consider a friend and you're starting to resent them: communicate, communicate, communicate. I can't stress it enough. Don't let things fester to the point that it's tainting your relationship to something you love or someone you care about. There is no relationship on Earth without it's disagreements and it's equally as toxic to try and create total uniformity as it is to constantly argue with people.

That's pretty much how I find my balance. I still take steps back from fandom when I need to or when I'm not having fun, and that's healthy. Hobbies in general should happen at your capacity, on your schedule. Now your balance will be different than mine, most likely, but I hope there's something here you can use regardless!

[digirankguide]

Off Page search engine marketing - Everything You Should Know

In the Digital Marketing enterprise search engine optimization is one of the great digital advertising and marketing techniques to construct your organic virtual presence. It’s a sluggish however constant increase advertising method for any sort of business, No remember the commercial enterprise is small scale or massive scale.

When it involves search engine marketing method you should have study and listened all of the stuff about On-Page SEO. Onpage search engine marketing could be very critical absolute confidence! But should also have right knowledge about Off Page SEO. Off-Page search engine marketing is a form of activity that have to continuously pass on. For right SEO Strategy, we have to supply the equal leverage to Off Page sports like On Page. But for this, we ought to have an intensive understanding of Off Page Activities. Empower your brand's digital destiny with our bespoke strategies – Bradford's trusted ally in the journey towards online excellence Best Bradford seo company

What is Off-Page search engine optimization?

Off Page search engine optimization is the task performed on other websites to market your personal internet site. This can help to enhance your Google SERP ranking. It’s some thing like getting a reference hyperlink in your personal internet site from another website. Off-page sports ought to be continuously completed so one can get the great outcomes. Off Page is not about only submitting your internet site link to every other website, it’s loads more than this. Let’s apprehend things in detail.

Why Should Off-Page Activities Be Performed?

As we said earlier off-web page isn't always only about submitting your internet site to every other website. There is a selected motive behind this. Yes, you bought it right…High Quality Backlink Creation. Getting satisfactory oneway links to your internet site is the whole and sole purpose of acting these Off Page Activities. Make a observe we are announcing HIGH QUALITY BACKLINKS. Anyone can create oneway links however being one of the quality search engine optimization businesses in Pune Digital Mogli makes a speciality of developing only HIGH QUALITY BACKLINKS. The excellent oneway link will genuinely rank your internet site up within the Google SERP.

What are High-Quality Backlinks?

High-high-quality one way links are the reference hyperlinks that have been acquired with the aid of your website from any other fantastically actual website. This sort of oneway links can give you the exceptional results in terms of SERP ranking. An increasing wide variety of back links received’t work for certain. That’s why you ought to ought to awareness on generating brilliant one way links.

If you are getting one hundred superb one-way links than 1000 low-satisfactory one-way links, it’s truely beneficial for you. To generate excessive first-class one-way links you ought to need to publish your internet site at excessive proper internet site.

How To discover a Highly Authentic Website?

Let’s first apprehend what's a tremendously actual internet site. Google gives ratings to every internet site on the idea of a number of the beneath factors:

Domain Age

Content Quality

On-Page Factors

Backlink Profile

Let’s make it simple for you guys, the web sites which are having excessive area age, particular content, sturdy back-link profile in conjunction with on-web page elements are taken into consideration fairly actual web sites. But the query stays the equal how to locate it out?

Here are more than one gear via which you can discover extraordinarily authentic web sites.

SEM Rush: SEM Rush is one of the excellent gear to discover excessive-authority web sites. From this, you can get one way links for your internet site. Through SEM Rush you may do competitors analysis who is doing good enterprise via digital advertising and marketing. We at Digital Mogli use SEM Rush most customarily. This device additionally gives you some robust suggestions for on-web page search engine marketing also.

AhRefs: Ahref is also another clearly proper device for finding high authority sites for your business area of interest. This device got a very user-friendly dashboard. The Digital Mogli crew is familiar with this tool additionally. You can do competitor evaluation through this device. This device also affords a loose seek console for your internet site. Absolutely everyone ought to use that characteristic of ahrefs. AhRefs seek console function helped us loads to preserve our backlink profile strongly.

Uber Suggest: Uber Suggest is developed by way of renowned virtual marketer Neil Patel. It’s also any other gem for the virtual marketing industry. This device also fulfills all of the functions of SEMRush and Ahrefs. When it involves the cost of this tool, it’s comparatively less high-priced than different equipment. It may be the fine device for one-way link evaluation, keyword research, and on-page pointers. A amateur ought to decide upon this device for positive. Catapult your brand's digital presence with our expert strategies – Bradford's cornerstone for online success SEO services in Bradford.

Some Of the Off web page Activities Recommended By Digital Mogli Experts

Brand Mention

Business Listing

Blog Submission

Infographic Submission

Pdf Submission

Article Submission

Directory Submission

Social Bookmarking

Blog Commenting

Image Submission

Also Read:

Ultimate search engine marketing Tools You Should Know About

Outcome of Digital Marketing On Your Business

[eimearkuopio]

This is actually a situation where I'm going to claim precedence: not because I have the subjective lived experience of transness, but because I've spent the last three years specifically teaching students at two of the world's most prestigious universities how to do this specific type of data analysis in the most intersectional way I could find; and I've received only positive feedback on the techniques I employed for this particular topic, even when I specifically asked for constructive criticism and requested feedback privately/discreetly from my queer and trans students.

Cliff notes version, YMMV, but this is a Tumblr post, not a full lecture course. There are four main types of data: nominative, ordinal, interval, and ratio.

Nominative covers any arbitrary set of categories, and does not require a relationship between categories, e.g. types of animal. Ordinal data have a relationship between categories where order actually matters for the data, but you don't know how much of a difference there is between them, e.g. finishing order in a race. Broadly speaking, we use these categories for qualitative analysis.

Interval has a specific, measurable, constant difference between two quantities, but there is no "physical" meaning to the arbitrary location of the zero point. An example is temperature in Celcius or Fahrenheit; there's a zero on the scale, but it is subjective, not objective. You can add or subtract these numbers and still retain meaning, but you can't really say something is "twice as hot" and have it be a physically meaningful statement.

Ratio data have a physical meaning behind their zero point. Examples include temperature in Kelvin, physical length etc. Something can actually be "twice as hot" in Kelvin. These two data types are quantitative; we can do objective analysis on them in a meaningful fashion, as long as we understand the nature of the data we are working with and the limitations and constraints that apply.

Hormone levels are ratio data. They are quantitative. They have zero values. That makes them great for looking at specific cases and understanding specific scenarios.

Gender is definitely some form of qualitative categorical data. But the thing about data science is, it's only useful when you're looking at lots of observations. And crucially, when you're dealing with categories, and certain categories are underrepresented, you can actually fuck up your analysis worse by treating your categories as if they were all equally likely.

What does this mean for diversity and inclusivity? It means that, bizarrely, we might do more harm by insisting that minority identities be included in a default analysis as if they were not minorities than by ignoring them completely while doing your initial data analysis.

This is not erasure. It is accepting that doing mathematical analysis correctly requires that we avoid tokenism!

When we have accepted and overcome this counter-intuitive step, we must then ask ourselves: what does that mean for us? I genuinely hope to spend my career answering that question in multiple walks of life, and relating to many minority identities, but I'm going to limit myself to a few points for right now.

Correlation does not imply causation, but it does show correlation. The majority of people do fit into one of two gender categories. Those categories are strongly correlated with biological sex, which is also a category which is defined based on some combination of other data observations. Both gender and sex are not exclusively binary, but they can each be reasonably approximated as bimodal distributions with a strong interaction term, which will often be the best starting point for robust analysis.

Does this mean we should ignore individuals who do not fit into our binary majority of "gender and sex match for whatever definitions we have chosen for our binary categories" boxes? No, because there is always some degree of subjectivity in any analysis that reduces the complexity of our data. But it's not wrong to construct an initial theoretical framework around a simplified model, and then generalise to a more complicated representation as the need arises. Newton's Theory Of Gravity is what we use in everyday life, even though you need Einstein to cover edge cases like gravitational lensing, because it's a pretty useful simplification when you're dealing with 99.999999% of cases. That doesn't mean we're going to erase Einstein, but it would be equally silly to force everyone to use four-dimensional tensor calculus to understand Thing Fall Towards Planet This Fast.

How do you find your General Theory Of Diversity? Ironically, this is where intersectionality meets high-level mathematics. Morality is a highly local function, and if you try to use a single equation to represent it everywhere, that equation will be very effective when dealing with cases similar to the ones you trained your conceptual model on! Unfortunately, as soon as you move away from a set of observations with a known and unassailably correct binary yes/no good/evil model, even if there is an underlying and objective truth, the way observations and fallibility work mean that the model is likely to get things very wrong. That's why it's such a mistake to declare anything infallibly, because even if you're correct, the moment you start to generalise a conceptual model based on that observation, you're introducing bias when you apply the concept to more complicated scenarios. You can kind of get around this using splines, which are very cool but also almost impossible to explain accurately and completely from first principles.

BUT if you never make any approximations, you actually can't make any predictions. Ever. You can't model ideas without reducing the complexity of the real world into something our limited brains can handle. We do it all the time subconsciously, and it's how we survive. I actually believe neurodivergence is a result of certain human brains being optimised to use non-standard approximations in this innate conceptual modelling, and I have some pretty interesting ideas in terms of what that means when learning to "pass" as neurotypical, but that's a different post.

Ultimately, it's not wrong to refer to testosterone and estrogen as male and female hormones. They're actually causally linked to many of the observations used in the admittedly subjective binary classification according to sex that humans seem to do by default. Acknowledging this is not ipso facto erasure, although I admit it can and often is weaponised against those who do not fit into the majority "binary matches!" categories.

But to properly and meaningfully account for those minority individuals, we need to define exactly how we are constructing our model. It's a painful paradox, that to properly include non-standard individuals in our system (which is of necessity a simplified model of a complex reality), we must define their identities exactly in a way that may feel like the goal is exclusion rather than inclusion. To me, the solution is to consider whether the specific problem we are dealing with actually requires using categories at all; and where it does, to use the most generic model that allows for a meaningful resolution to the problem.

This has some really shitty outcomes sometimes! Suppose a bunch of afab people are really really freaked out by penises, and they desperately want a space free of penises. It's going to suck for trans women to be told they're not welcome; and it's also going to suck for trans men to be told they ARE welcome, because it reduces their complex identities to a body part that they weren't born with. And if we define that space as "women only", when what was actually intended was "the No Dicks Allowed On Account Of Our Trauma club", that's where the actual problem arises. How do we get around it? Not by insisting penises can go anywhere they want, that's for damned sure! But maybe by recognising that the people who created that (admittedly exclusionary!) club have valid trauma; and that some of the people who are being excluded also have valid trauma, and had nothing to do with causing the club members' trauma, and have a right to their own support; and by accepting that "women only" isn't actually a great way of stating "no dicks allowed", leaving the "no dicks allowed" club to have their little meetings, and starting another club where dick or lack thereof is irrelevant and every positive aspect of the "no dicks allowed" club is still present.

"But Eimear!" I hear you say. "We are marginalised! They are the ones excluding us!"

I agree with you.

I also guarantee they are saying the same fucking thing about you.

Here's the thing.

You're both half right.

You ARE marginalised.

THEY are not the ones excluding you.

The system excludes you.

Tear down the system.

One barrier at a time.

One oppression at a time.

Raise the floor. Tear down every glass ceiling, because all they really do is make it look like the people standing on top of them can fucking fly.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[jollyinfluencersweets]

The Definitive Guide to Understanding search engine marketing for San Jose Entrepreneurs.

Introduction

Welcome to The Definitive Guide to Understanding search engine optimisation for San Jose Entrepreneurs. In this entire guide, we will delve into the arena of Search Engine Optimization (search engine marketing) and explore how it could actually profit marketers in San Jose. Whether you're a small commercial owner or a startup founder, working out website positioning is needed in brand new virtual landscape.

What is website positioning?

website positioning stands for Search Engine Optimization. It is the technique of optimizing your internet site and its content to improve its visibility and rating on seek engine outcome pages (SERPs). By enforcing numerous tactics and strategies, one can increase healthy traffic on your web content and entice competencies patrons.

San Jose SEO Agency

search engine optimization consists of equally on-web page and off-web page optimization. On-page optimization focuses on optimizing someone internet pages by means of recovering content high-quality, metadata, key-phrase usage, and Have a peek at this website different components that impact seek engine scores. Off-web page optimization comprises construction splendid one-way links, social media advertising, and other exterior points that impact your webpage's authority and credibility.

The Importance of website positioning for San Jose Entrepreneurs

As an entrepreneur in San Jose, having a powerful on line presence is most important for success in present day competitive industrial landscape. With extra laborers turning to se's to locate products and services, rating top on SERPs can noticeably effect your visibility, manufacturer know-how, and targeted visitor acquisition.

Implementing advantageous web optimization recommendations help you:

Increase Organic Traffic: By acting on the primary web page of search results for crucial key terms, one can appeal to greater healthy visitors to your website.

Boost Brand Visibility: Higher scores mean more publicity to your emblem, premier to elevated emblem awareness and credibility among conceivable users.

Target Local Customers: As a San Jose entrepreneur, focused on regional valued clientele is central. Optimizing your webpage for local search engine marketing might actually help rank larger in local searches and hook up with close by shoppers.

Drive Qualified Leads: search engine optimization allows you allure incredibly distinctive visitors it truly is more likely to transform into paying users, maximizing your ROI.

Stay Ahead of Competitors: By staying updated with the cutting-edge search engine optimization tendencies and concepts, which you could dwell one step forward of your competitors and secure a competitive aspect within the marketplace.

The Definitive Guide to Understanding search engine optimisation for San Jose Entrepreneurs

In this segment, we will explore the key elements of web optimization that each and every San Jose entrepreneur should still bear in mind. From key phrase studies to content optimization, we can cowl the whole thing you need to realize to kickstart your website positioning trip.

1. Conducting Keyword Research

One of the first steps in imposing an potent web optimization technique is carrying out key-word learn. Keywords are the terms or words that customers input into engines like google whilst purchasing for genuine