#or if its queerplatonic or normal platonic or if its something else entirely
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Keep smiling through, just like you always do
#they are so interesting man#heart and soul? yeah. they are so complex#their relationship is a scribble and multiple connected dots that are all undefined or lost in translation in regards to meaning#this specifically is about when it loops? yeah. its so weird.#cuz souls kinda going insane and hearts trying to survive#but theyre also on good terms when soul has his moments of clarity?#but also heart is deathly afraid of him?#but also heart has confessed (queerplatonically? romantically? platonically? who knows?) in the past?#they dont know if theyre romantically together#or if its queerplatonic or normal platonic or if its something else entirely#meanwhile they both are just terrible to one another#yeah⦠the them. so very [UNDEFINED]#uhhhh anyways i did not mean to go on that rant but whatever#cj heart#cj soul#cccc#chonnys charming chaos compendium#chonny jash#uhhhhh should i add a cw shipping bc of these hashtags?#uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh fine#the image does not imply romance but my rant surely did lmao#cw shipping mention
116 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
Hehehe
5 spades, 7 diamonds, 9 hearts, king clubs
šš Chococara, perhaps?
send me four random card numbers/faces and their corresponding card suits, AND maybe a ship/fandom im into and ill talk abt it using the AO3 card deck!!
YES
so what im working with here is fluff, modern au, arranged marriage, AND you pulled the WIP card so ill plotdump a fic premise like this is a WIP im working on and not something i just made up >:)
so, first off, this is arranged marriage AND modern au. nothing is going to change EXCEPT that the cookies have technology now. ill possibly use some other tropes while im at it heehoo
-
dark choco is still a prince, and dark cacao is still king of his kingdom. caramel arrow is from a family that is not nobility, nor part of the court; however, she is the First Watcher, the youngest commander of the watchers to ever hold the position.
normally, the prince would marry the child of a noble family, keeping ties within the court intact. however, because of her performance as First Watcher, caramel arrow's family is sought out by the king, and the prince's hand is extended to her in marriage
this ends up angering the court actually; many of them have eligible sons, daughters, and children the prince could marry, but for reasons i havent fully thought of yet bc im making this up as i go, dark cacao wants caramel arrow to marry dark choco. and of course, her family agrees.
so now we get into choco and cara meeting. they've never actually met each other before! dark choco is the prince, and caramel arrow may be the commander of the watch, but they've never really had any reason to get to know each other. of course, they've heard of each other! they've just never spoken a word to each other.
HOWEVER.
they do know each other online.
they met years ago online, and have been friends online for a long time! neither of them know the other's real name or face; they're both hidden behind pseudonyms and profile pic icons, but they're still very good friends and get along great despite not knowing the other person's name or face. they have a lot of inside jokes and other online friends they share, but they've been friends the longest out of everyone else they're friends with.
over the course of the fic, caramel arrow and dark choco meet in real life and its awkward, and then they turn around and complain to each other online about how awkward it is to not really know your arranged spouse at all. eventually they find out that they're each other's online friend and that they've been talking to each other this ENTIRE time, and it ends up really fluffy and cute ùwú
this could be read romantically, queerplatonically, just platonically and they're married, however you ship them bc im not planning on writing this haha. EITHER WAY, they're cute together
-
-
-

29 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Itās so fucking funny when arophobes are like WELL BY YOUR DEFINITION GUESS I AM IN A QUEEPLATONIC POLYCULE NOW LMAO like Kevin you jape and joke but. you could be right yāknow. Like whenever you say āI do [generic platonic intimacy] with my friends but I donāt call it a QueerPlatonic Partnership, its just friendship to meā you are admitting the only reason u arenāt in a QPP is because, while ur relationship COULD be described as one, you donāt call it that. Thatās cool, only you get to define what your relationships r and how do u call them! Thatās great! but listen. Youāre saying your relationships fit The Mold of a QPP but that u just label it as a friendship thus making it Not A QPP -which is valid, u do u!- buuuuut then throw a hissy fit when someone, aro or not, decides to do it the other way around. Funny how that works.
Just say you hate the āweirdā, āfreakyā, ānot normalā gays and go, u fucking traitor, And go do some self-reflection at that, hm? For starters ask yourself why do TERFs say the same shit about QPPs? Or why the hell do you assume polyamory is always NSFW? Or why do you have the need to define other peopleās relationships/identities of them as if they were fuckin dumb? Or why do you call to the medicalization (āthatās just friends yāall need therapy lololololā) of people who just fucking DARED do something cishets donāt like? Or why do you think amatonormativity, one of the biggest weapons of heteronormativity and the PatriarchyTM, doesnāt exist simply because the icky freaky aros and yucky cringe aces care about it? Or ur involvement with cringe culture which isnāt ableist at all! (last sentence is sarcastic btw)
āItās just a friendship! I call that friendshipā well they certainly donāt call it a friendship, the same way you donāt call your so-called Extremely Close Deeply Intimate Platonic Share-a-house friendships QPPs (which would be their ārealā name but as Iāve said before, you name your relationships how u wantā not how others tell you, which is something exclus LOVE to do! so progressive /s). Like itās not that hard, just stop getting pressed about how people live and define their platonic experiences , simple as that lmao... and thatās not even taking into account the HUGE amatonormativity we ALL, aro or not, face.
But sure KEVIN go on about how having a relationship that most cishets would undoubtedly bash and think of as some freaky ālovelessā perversion of a married couple is actually A Very Normal, Not Opressed at All Normal Not Hated By Cishets Friendship. MAybe learn not to agree with TERFs and to apply some self-awareness and self-reflection to urself cause if u go around every post about QPPs saying āIF THIS EXISTED I WOULD BE IN ONEā, maybe you are so close yet so far to realizing QPPs are actually, while not normalized nor visible in cishet society, very common, particularly within the LGBT community, and even ur alloro ass could b in one without noticing...
i bet at least some exclusionists are probably part of the marginalized identities they love to shit on without knowing but they will take much much longer to notice than to make a miserable google search and educate themselves on what a queerplatonic partnership is and entails. Remember all those posts about mentally ill children never getting diagnosed because their parents r mentally ill too and having only known that reality they really think āeveryone is Like That, everyone Does Thatā? Yeah this entire situation has a vague resemblance to that. āThatās Just friends! how is that Gay? Everyone does that!ā Kevin, you are basically married to your best friend....... MOST CISHETS DONT DO THAT IN FACT ITS A SOCIETAL EXPECTATION TO HANG OUT MORE WITH YOUR SPOUSE THAN UR FRIENDS YOU PIECE OF OVERCOOKED MACARONI... FFS the day you douchefucks learn that amatonormativity is an important feminist term describing the insidious way heterosexual relationships are pushed onto people by putting romantic love above literally everything else will b the day I die. /hyperbole
Meanwhile keep it up with the racism and ableism Kevin, Good Job at redirecting homophobia towards the members of the community were suposed to be in for SAFETY and not popularity points. /s Iām sure ur cishet friends will laugh at first before they get tired of picking on the Freaky Gross Fake White Girl Queers (cause thatās what u assume every single aspec person is anyway lol, I guess all of the black aces Iāve met are bots then /j). Then it will be you because the bar for meeting cisallohet expectations gets higher and higher the more u commodify, assimilate, and sell off this community that, I HAVE TO REMIND U, ISNT A āYOU HAVE TO THIS GAY TO ENTERā COOL KID CLUB, itās made for SURVIVAL, itās a fucking radical CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT!
when u put your siblings down, we become vulnerable to the patriarchy
to destroy homophobia as it is, we have to defy the societal expectations of what a ānormalā relationship is, because to most people, ānormalā = āthe only optionā, and that option is marrying a person of the opposite sex and keeping romantic and sexual intimacy with them and centering ur life around THAT and NOTHING ELSE. A straight marriage in which u owe sex to ONE person as long as u are together. To even the most vanilla cis gay person, thatād be denying them of their own sexuality and agency. Hell a lot of cishets would find that boring, restraining, and unpleasant! They too have the right to explore their sexuality and have whatever relationships they want (as long as no one gets hurt, granted).
if we want to fight against that, we have to understand that āweirdā relationships are an option, Too, just as Good as the ādefaultā! And QPPs are a BIG part of that!
so for your OWN SAKE, maybe learn what words mean and apply them accordingly before you go onto tumblr to bully other gay people for existing, OKAY?
TLDR: QPPs arenāt just friendships, the limits between different types of relationships are defined by the people who are in them and not others, QPPs are more common than it seems (some people could be in a QPP without noticing) but certainly arenāt normalized or accepted in cishet society, and exclusionists are ignorant (and racist and ableist) pieces of shit that are basically cutting off their noses to spite their face. Pushing other people out of the community to look better to cisallohets has very real drawbacks to everyone.
54 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
More Mary Thoughts
@wizardlysherlok replied to this post on AGRA/Agra parallels in Doyle-cannon and BBC-canon:
it feels like if AGRA was empty of full, it wouldnāt be right for john neither way: if it was full, it would the the great betrayal and also the āshe wasnāt supposed to be like thatā, the wife who lied immensely to her husband and(for god sakes) shot his bf. If it was empty it wouldnāt work either because it was boring and the same life john was trying to scape because it was making him unhappy...conclusion : Mary does not work for john in every wayĀ
Ooh, a chance to talk about Mary generally! Iāve apparently got just enough codeine still in my system, and itās close enough to the witching hour,Ā that this seems like a fun topic rather than the donāt-poke-the-bear dread that usually falls on me when I speak her name in this fandom. Hereās hoping I donāt regret this come tomorrow.
Even in Doyle canon, I never particularly liked Maryās story, which is meant as a judgment on Doyle and not some fictional woman. Sheās clearly introduced because Watson --being a romantic-- needs a romantic partner, and for a whole host of historical reasons Doyle felt like it needed to be a woman. Any woman would do, apparently. And even without getting into issues of whether this is akin to queerbaiting, it also just makes for a very boring character IMO. Mary is the equivalent of a Bond girl : more saintly than sex-appeal, perhaps, but who only really exists as an object the male characters get to react against. Thereās precious little of Mary specifically that makes any difference to SIGN.
I do like some of the grace notes Doyle gives her in later stories. I think thereās a reference in one of the stories that she had a reputation for being both kind and clever and women from her neighborhood came to her to help them solve their little problems, a sort of more everyday vision of Sherlock Holmes. But at least in SIGN sheās a walking trope and frustratingly little more.Ā
I think the Granada series was wise to leave her out almost entirely. (She only appears in the movie version of SIGN, and there is only a client.) She just would have been a distraction to the story they were trying to tell. In the RDJ/Jude Law movies sheās actually brilliantlyĀ done, somehow challenging and supporting their relationship at the same time. Sheās also witty and daring and would not seem at all out of place in a Jane Austen novel with all that witty back-and-foth, and all three of them have this great chemistry. If ever there was an adaptation that screamed both Johnlock and Johnlockary (and of course Warstan), itās this one.
Goodness, we need more fanfic about Kelly Reillyās Mary. I need to write her again. Sheās brilliant.
Which brings us to the BBC. Iām going to be very brave and say my biggest problem with her isnāt that she wedged herself into Johnās and Sherlockās relationship and somehow came away with the right to dictate its terms, even posthumously. Itās not even that she lied to her husband and manipulated him, endangering him and their child in the process; or that she shot Sherlock, or was an assassin who apparently went mercenary. All of that could be really interesting if done well! And really, I can think of storylines that would actually justify quite a lot of that. Even shooting, even killing Sherlock, even not being apologetic about it after the fact- I could write a story where that character made sense as a romantic opposite to John. I actually got about 10,000 words into one attempt, though I never finished or published it because the fandom was pretty toxic to anyone interested in a more shades-of-grey ersion of Mary at the time.
No, what really drives me up the wall with BBCās version of Mary is they donāt really settle on any one version of her. Actually in each of the five episodes she appears in, thereās this radically different version of who she are and what motivates her: supportive friend; bride; sociopath assassin; government agent; martyr. The most sympathetic take on that I can give is that Sherlock himself is trying to figure her out and canāt make sense of her so keeps trying one mold after another. But whatever the intent, the effect is that Maryās just ridiculously muddled for me, and I never really connected to her because I didnāt understand her. Iām not sure the show-runners did either. Seeing what Moffat in particular did with women characters in Doctor Who makes me think he genuinely struggles to find them interesting if they arenāt really... extra, for lack of a better word. John and Sherlock, being men, had their BAMF moments but also a psychology that actually made sense along somewhat normal terms; Mary had to be a super-sekrit assassin, and a rogue that was targeted by a media mogul, and the hero who saved Holmes and then did it again from beyond the grave. All of which would have been fine if it actually came from a coherent characterization. But BBCās Mary was all BAMF and stunning reveals and little to no coherence that made that make sense, so her character never really developed any kind of a reality for me. My brain couldnāt make sense of her, so my heart never latched on either. In the end I was just left confused and frustrated
Even all these years later! I still donāt know what to make of her, and thatās just bad writing. I would love to have a Mary who lied from start to finish with JohnĀ āTrust Issuesā Watson, or who shot Sherlock to the chest where it somehow made sense. That could be fascinating. Itās not what we got, though; at least itās not what I was able to get out of the show.
Hereās another thing that would be fascinating, and Iād really love to see in some adaptation; even this one, though I donāt think weāll get it. Mary Morstan in 1895 makes some sort of sense even with a suspiciously close friendship between Holmes and Watson, because male friendships operated in a very different realm than heterosexual marriages did. There were different kinds of intimacies in that time, I think. But when you bring the characters into the modern world, it eems like a super-close friendship like Holmes and Watson seem to have, one that seem to emotionally resemble marriage even if thereās no physical/sexual component, would be a challenge to what any self-respecting modern woman would tolerate from her husband. I donāt mean because it makes John gay, and of course married people can have friends, but thereās something about John and Sherlock that in the modern world strays damned close to emotional infidelity.Ā
I mean, how can you have that without either weakening the relationship between John and Sherlock, or making Mary cuckolded in some sense? Now throw into the mix in this particular adaptation, even before Mary, John and Sherlock had a ... unique relationship. John would date and have sex (or not), Sherlock would be stuck in seemingly perpetual celibacy, but if Sherlock dared to date (and I think this would be true for a man as well as a woman) John goes into a disbelieving jealous rage. This strikes me as not normal male friendship, though itās not romantic or sexual either. Itās queerplatonic af on Sherlockās side, increasingly stretching the bounds of what can be calledĀ āplatonicā, and for John, itās kind of a monodirectional monogamy in at least an emotional sense. I mean, the man went and got married, but we all saw his reaction when Sherlock dared to (seemingly) date someone else.
Now throw a modern woman into that mix, trying to marry and start a family with one half of a duo in that truly fucked-up dynamic. Imagine what it would be like for her to exist in that world. You can imagine polyamory of some variety, or jealousy, or a very altered view from what the mainstream imagnes are the expectations of married life, or whatever spin you like to put on it.Ā
I guarantee you -- if done well -- it would be fascinating. And Iād very much like to see it. Or read it, or something. If you want to make that woman as much of a danger junkie as John, as much of a skilled, professional killer, wehther on the governmentās payroll or a disillusioned former agent who refused to follow orders and was forced toĀ ābranch outā or even just a true psychopath who was utterly self-motivated and ruthless but still wanted to protect John or at least what John represented to her?Ā
Well, that could be fascinating, too. Even more so. Thereās just one catch: youāve got to actually tell the story. They never seemed to get around to that, and I think Iām still more than a bit bitter.
..... And apparently Iām rambling. Thanks for allowing me to talk about her a bit. Iāll shut up now. :-)
11 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
nothing seems to make sense- rant on my sexual/romantic/genderĀ identity, fanfiction, and a heteronormative world
I feel like whenever I seem to find some label or new identity that works for me, everything changes on me. I canāt figure out what I am or what I want or anything. (long rant post about self-identity)
All through my teenage years the idea of sex and stuff terrified me. I wasnāt interested in sexual pleasure or anything until I was 18 and actually tried stuff for myself.
Even then it only happened as anĀ āon-neededā basis because I was still so averse to my own genitalia and luckily my libido was so low that it was hardly ever a problem. I remember when I was 10 years old and my mother explained periods to me, I cried the entire car ride home because it terrified me.
I did have crushes and stuff growing up, and I acted on them a lot (like admitting feelings to them) but nothing ever really came of it. But every time friends talked about sexual exploits I would get nauseated just from the mere mention. Like anxiety-nauseated.
I remember being 14 and finding out the word ābisexualā and deciding right then and there that it applied to me. I liked girls and guys and it made sense at the time. I just figured maybe I was a late-bloomer.
By the time I was like 22, I started looking into asexuality but it didnāt make sense. Because to be asexual you have to not experience sexual attraction at ALL. And I realized I had before- but it had been fictional characters and celebrities I was a fan of that caused me to be sexually attracted.
And even now as Iām thinking about it, I canāt really remember if I had experienced sexual attraction to anyone I had a crush on. Like, I canāt look at someone and sayĀ āIām sexually attracted to themā unless... well, sometimes. I can rarely, I think. Itās almost always women I can be sexually attracted to without feeling connected to them first.
But my attraction has historically been mostly men, even if its been fictional or celebrity-based. Like Iāve been writing fanfiction for 10 years!!! I wrote and consumed a lot of sexual and kinky fanfiction that got my motor running, and I knew it was sexually driving to me. I am less interested in the sexual fanfiction than many other writers (I prefer nonsexual ones most of the time unless IāmĀ āin the moodā) but still, I consumed it and it was safe and I was sexually interested. And it was only gay male fanfiction (even if they were written with vulvas) that made me interested. I just couldnāt connect to sapphic fanfiction for the life of me, which didnāt make sense to me because I thought I was a bisexual woman.
I came to the realization that I was nonbinary when I was 18. I didnāt really experience dysphoria 99% of the time becauseĀ āfeeling like a boyā only happened once in a blue moon. But it happened often enough (since I was 14) that I took notice and realized that I am genderfluid. I didnāt really bother with it except occasionally dressing more masculine and, eventually, cutting two feet off my hair. I didnāt even think about transitioning until I was 22, and I really didnāt want to before then.
Now Iām 24 and Iāve been on testosterone for exactly 14 weeks and 4 days. In September I realized and came out as a nonbinary trans man. My body seems to function better- I donāt know how exactly, but I can feel it. My hunger increased first, and then my libido. Itās like my nonexistent libido fucking skyrocketed and I feelĀ ānormalā amounts of sex drive.
I still havenāt had sex. Iām still scared, but its slightly less so. Iāve been putting pressure on myself for almost a decade now that IĀ āshouldā be wanting sex and that I SHOULD have done it already. But I want to do it. But I also donāt. I donāt know, honestly.
I thought a while back that my feelings towards sex must have to do with me realizing Iām trans and that it has to do with bottom dysphoria. And I believe that has a good part of why I feel the way I do. That maybe if I was born AMAB I wouldnāt have these problems. But also now that Iām on testosterone, my bottom dysphoria has become less pressing and I realize the dysphoria is with the rest of me. So it canāt be part of it?
And then I realize that sometimes the feeling of being a woman comes back, once in a blue moon. Like how I felt when I first realized I was trans, but opposite. But this time I hate it because I donāt want to feel like a woman sometimes. So then my gender becomes another thing that I donāt know about, even though I feel happier and better on testosterone.
AND NOW I look back on my life and think about theĀ āromantic interestsā I had in life- was I really romantically interested?? Or was I just following how everyone else acted? But I remember having crushes as early as kindergarten. But even kids do what they think isĀ ānormalā so what if I was influenced?? I literally only chose the cutest guy in my class andĀ ādecidedā I had a crush on him and then it became true because I decided it was.
A few years ago, I discovered the aspec/arospec communities and I try those terms too. But as soon as a new term feels like it fits, I feel like something from my pastĀ āprovesā differently or something changes or I find someone I think is cute.
I find myself thinking that I am sexually attracted to personalities and not necessarily people. I mean, physicality is a HUGE part of it still for me, but I wonāt find someone physically attractive until I know their personality. But I can still look at someone and thinkĀ āthey would be my typeā- but how could I be demisexual, for example, if I know ahead of time that I could be attracted to someone? But also if I donāt like their personality, all attraction fades. So the personality does matter.
As far as arospec, I thought that would be no biggie for me. I had experienced crushes and romantic attraction I think. But like I said earlier, what if Iām wrong about myself?
I once talked to a friend about love and I told her that I donāt see why all the types of love are different. I donāt see where the lines blur for other people. I just either love someone or I donāt. And the more I love someone, the more intensely I want to be close to them. But also I love the idea of having a life partner or partners. Iāve also considered that maybe Iām just naive, because I have ADD and itās known to cause emotional maturity to be delayed by about 4-5 years and MAYBE I really just wasnāt ready or mature enough to know.
The idea of relationships always freaked me out. Any time someone showed interest in me, it made me paralyzed with fear and I donāt know WHY. I always assumed that it was because they would expect sex from me, and the idea of sex paralyzed me as well, so it made me averse to relationships.
Then I thought that maybe Iām polyamorous and that feelingĀ āstuckā with one partner scared me, because I need my freedom and room to breathe. And that maybe I need a triad or something to be happy.
And now maybe I need a queerplatonic relationship that I can be close to someone without the expectations that a heteronormative/allo-normative relationship have. But that canāt work either, because I might become comfortable enough to be romantically/sexually interested and then it wouldnāt exactly be queer-PLATONIC anymore, so that canāt work.
Every term I try seems to get close and I canāt find anything that hits the nail on the head that saysĀ āyes, this is meā. Asexual, aromantic, bisexual, biromantic, graysexual, demisexual, demiromantic, nebulasexual, omnisexual, panromantic, pansexual, abrosexual, abroromantic, NOTHING. I canāt seem to make anything work or fit for me because everything is too confusing and too much and I donāt know.
I donāt know myself. I donāt know what I want, or who I want, or when I might want whateverĀ āitā is. I donāt like hating myself because I canāt figure it out. I donāt know what I want and it angers me. And I donāt know how to find myself.
#lgbt#lgbtq#aromantic#asexual#aspec#arospec#queer#bisexual#biromantic#pansexual#panromantic#demisexual#omnisexual#literally just tagging things that I have identified with#abrosexual#abroromantic#maybe someone could help me#its a scary world and i dont know how to fix myself
10 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
Hello! I was wondering if you had any advice for my scenario: I don't think I am anything but heterosexual (most of my crushes have been women) but I think I might be potentially interested in my best friend (to give a description, he's gay himself)? I dunno, I think about the possibility and I'm not entirely adverse to the idea. I remember even cuddling with him and liking it. I don't know what to do or how to feel. Any advice?
Hi Nonny!
First of all, itās totally okay to be confused about who you are and what youāre feeling: despite what the media and bigots want you to believe, sexuality is fluid and sometimes it really isĀ āstraight with an exceptionā as cringy as some people make that out to be.Ā
Second of all, Iām not an expert, so this is my disclaimer to say that take my words with a grain of salt; I have never had any serious relationship in my life, but Iāve spent endless hours consoling my friends with my thoughts, so hopefully that will help you <3
Finally, Iām assuming you are self-identified as a male since you do offer a pronoun for your friend, and given the context of the wording of this ask, itās the deduction Iām making here.
Now that thatās all done and done: ITāS OKAY. Sometimes, we discover things late in life about ourselves *coughs* either due to environment or our own ignorance, and when we take a moment to sit down and self reflect, the whole world suddenly clicks. It IS a scary thing to think youāre one thing but as our understanding of sexuality continues to expand pretty much daily, the more everything starts to make sense. Lovely, it could be anything from just feeling comfortable around your friend to actual attraction. I think with men, itās difficult to parse those feelings because you guys are forced to not engage in them because āitās not manlyā or āyouāre such a girl if you doā (which I donāt understand why thatās an insult but go off I guess). For that reason, my heart hurts for guys because societal norms dictate that you arenāt allowed to discover yourself. Itās slowly getting better, but thereās still a lot of work to do.Ā
So in that sense, Nonny, I understand why you may be confused and unsure, especially if you may have been brought up to bottle up those feelings or to not be allowed to self-reflect. Iām here to tell you: ITāS OKAY. Be emotional. YOU ARE HUMAN, and as such, we are emotional creatures. Iād rather you cry and talk about them than bottle up your emotions to a point where they convert into anger and bitterness.
So, back to your question after my little tangent there. Iām NOT going to label you, Lovely, thatās not my place, but many-a-people Iāve talked to mention similar feelings when realizing that they were bi- or pan- romantic/sexual, and only realized it later BECAUSE they were in similar situations or escaped confining lives that shunned anything other than the heteronormative.
Sexuality is a GINORMOUS scale that ranges fromĀ ānot at allā(sexuality) toĀ āvery veryā(sexuality) and thereās so much in between that, that itās PERFECTLY NORMAL to possibly beĀ āstraight with an exceptionā if THATāS the label YOU choose for yourself. Iām not going to tell youĀ ānope, youāre bi, sorryā. Thatās not my place. You know yourself better than some rando blogger on the internet, LOL. THAT SAID Lovely, I am going to encourage you to at least sit down and do a LOT of internal self-reflection, and reading up on sexuality on Wikipedia, or, just doing a bit of Googling I found the Bisexuality Resource CentreĀ and I donāt know what its reputation is amongst other bis, but just like AVEN helped me as a STARTING POINT to understanding who I am, perhaps that site will also help you as you begin this journey. From there, like I did, youāll find some terms and other books you can read and Google and begin to formulate your own opinions and understanding about you.Ā Hereās an interesting article on wikiHow that talks about trying to define friendship from romantic feelings. And another one here from Psychology Today on Platonic love.Ā
So, where does that leave you with your friend, then? I think itās important for me to note here that itās VERY IMPORTANT that through your journey, you NEED to also take your friendās feelings into consideration; PLEASE donāt lead him on if you have no intention of following through. Itās very possible that you and your best friend are just SO comfortable with each other that seeking physical contact is yāallās way of expressing your appreciation and platonic love for each other. Chances are good, depending on where you live, that he feels constantly on-guard when heās in public and when heās with his family, so letting his guard down around you is a high honour that you should NOT exploit. Cuddle and hug, thereās nothing wrong with that; there IS such a thing and queerplatonic life partners / relationshipsĀ (my best friends have this very thing, in fact), and you guys could love each other very much and get everything you need out of a relationship without sex.
Hereās where it gets tricky and scary, though, Lovely, and it may be better to address it before it morphs into something that will irreparably damage your friendship. I think in this case it may be worth talking to your friend about your confusion, but donāt necessarily say itās because of him. Express to him that youāve been having some feelings lately that youāre not sure about, and youāre currently trying to learn about yourself and his opinions and strength will be valued. If he is your best friend, he will encourage you and be a shoulder for you while you navigate your emotions. He should be able to provide you with thatĀ āin the knowā knowledge of how you can understand yourself so that you will be happier and less confused. Men so often donāt talk about their feelings, and trust me, it will be beneficial to you in this case, I think. Talking makes it REAL. Keeping it to yourself only internalizes it and can fester wrong conclusions.
Will it become awkward between yāall? Maybe, possibly, or not. The cuddles may stop, if only so that you guys donāt get your feelings mixed up with your friendship. But know that everything will be OKAY at the end of it all. My self-discovery journey took 4 years, so itās NOT an overnight thing. But having someone you trust to talk about it, and to acknowledge it makes you feel more valid. And in the end, if it becomes something else or not, at least you know a lot more about you and about where you want to stand in your relationship with your best friend.
Now, Iāve avoided saying this next bit up until this point because the important thing to focus on is YOU, BUT. Thereās ALSO the slight possibility that you guys got yourself into a Sherlock-and-John situation where heās ENDLESSLY pining for his only-dated-women-since-weāve-been-together best friend, and heās keeping quiet because he loves you and your friendship is more important to him than losing you⦠which is why he allows the cuddles with you. IF that scenario is the case, AGAIN, you guys NEED to talk about it so youāre not leading each other on. A strong friendship will survive an emotional upheaval / revelation like that, and even if nothing comes of it, you guys will still be besties.
Bah, sorry it took me so long to answer this, Lovely. I was crying the whole time I wrote this because Iām a sap and it reminds me of my own āoh shit Iām not brokenā moment. That and I am SO worried that your friendship will break, but you guys seem to be very close so the TL;DR version of this is: TALK. Honestly, many problems are solved with open and honest communication, and having someone close to you hold your hand on your journey will be a welcome thing to have.
In the end, this is YOUR decision to make, so have a think on it, weigh your options, and do what your heart feels is right.
If any of my followers experienced something similar, or if I have erred anywhere, please feel free to add your own, Lovelies, so that Nonny doesnāt feel so alone and so that they can know that everything will be alright.
#steph replies#my advice#life advice#friendship vs relationship#friends#chatting with nonnies#Anonymous#sexuality
41 notes
Ā·
View notes