#onsted

[thuggaloshow]

[fuckyeahthuggaloshow]

[leviismybby]

What's up with some people in the aot fandom and thier hatred for Hange? Ya'll good? Clearly some people completely missed the point of how good thier character is. I wanted to talk to someone about them and this fucking person goes "not even levi likes her why should I? She stinks in canon too" Never blocked someone faster. Some of you don't have friends and it shows in how you think that Levi hates Hange. They singlehandedly carried the survey corps in many things.

[thasorns-moved]

BANK ARTIT TANGWIBOONPANIT AS CHIVAS IN ONE NIGHT STAND (2023) dir. K Chainarong Tampong

[khizuo]

what's the best thing to do when someone who otherwise seems to be pro-palestine from their blog starts defending a zionist in my notes...

[naneun-no]

Every day I get more certain that there is no real ship. The members and the company let this shipping thing going on all these years because it benefits them, both in terms of money and being free to date who they want. There are more things that prove Jkk, Tkk or any other ships isn't real than the things that have been interpreted, from us shippers, as being real.

I’m super late on this but when you sent this I started on it, and then was promptly very overwhelmed by a large number of asks and kind of shut down. I found it in my drafts so figured I’d finish and post it, if you still care! Lol. Totally understand if you don’t 🤣

I already know I’m going to ramble so let’s get this out of the way — that’s a perfectly fine conclusion to come to. If that’s how you feel, it’s how you feel. I don’t know the inner workings of KPop marketing, so I couldn’t say whether as a whole they tend to “promote” ships (i.e. fanservice and questionable photoshoot concepts/poses, even mv interactions — is that what you mean?) because it makes them money, or if they follow the fans to see what they’re squawking about online and then serve up content to kind of give the people what they want. In other words, I’m not sure which came first, the chicken or the egg. I think we’d need an industry professional in the KPop media landscape, someone who’s followed KPop a lot longer than me, or at least a blogger more observant and analytical than me to tease that out.

On Jikook specifically — I have a few rebuttals to the idea that the relationship (whether it’s romantic or not) so many of us have clued into is some sort of fabricated marketing scheme. At the very least, it’s not only that. Let’s get into them.

#1: Just because something is marketable doesn’t make it fake.

Are their subgroup photoshoots adorable and thick with chemistry? Yep. Do I think for one moment that there was a BH executive behind the camera telling JK to look at Jimin like THAT? With the slow-gaze drop down to his lips (or his ass)? Idk, to me that’s laughable. He just does. Like, I think two things can be true at the same time: Jimin and Jung Kook can look objectively good together and also be a popular pairing within the fandom and so the company can kind of play into that and promote their interactions, and ALSO they can have a naturally affectionate, long-standing close personal relationship that boosts the chemistry of those interactions. Does that make sense? It’s sort of like when celebrities who are love interests in a movie do a press circuit, and they have palpable sexual tension — that’s half the reason they were cast as romantic leads in the first place — and they also get along really well behind the scenes, because they click and also have spent a ton of time together. Of course the Warner Bros executives or whoever’s funding the movie is like hell yeah, play it up, sell those tickets — but that doesn’t invalidate the fact that the co-stars have likely truly become close and truly have a connection. And, often, it’s later revealed that the co-stars have in fact been banging the whole time. Shocker. AND even if they aren’t — they still may have had a very real connection that could have definitely sparked into something more had they chosen to pursue it — for instance, I don’t think for a second that Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake wouldn’t have hooked up during FWB if he wasn’t so obsessed with his now wife (and she might have been in a relationship then too I don’t remember). And it was exactly the case with Tom and Zendaya. AND that’s just for celebrities, who’ve often only been working together for 8-9 months or so, making a movie. Not two guys who are attached at the hip and have been for the last near decade.

Whew. That was a lot of ands. Still with me?

#2: I think you’re seriously overestimating everyone’s acting ability.

Imagine being “on” all the time.

I get that they could turn things on and get purposefully flirty or suggestive during fansigns, or onstage, but BTS are some of the most prolific celebrities out there in terms of “behind the scenes” footage. They have posted hours and hours of what basically amounts to reality show content, spanning years of their lives.

“But reality TV is scripted.” Well, duh. It typically needs to have some sort of narrative, some sort of direction or it will be dull. But as anyone who watches reality TV will tell you, it’s scripted, but also it’s not. That’s what separates it from purely fictional movies and series with actors; it’s real people having, for the most part, real reactions in real time, and it’s what is so fascinating to so many people. You can script an interaction on a reality show, but it’s much harder to script every individual person’s reactions to that interaction, the interpersonal relationships that form, the nonverbal behaviors and cues, the personality traits that are revealed. More often than not, someone’s true character, or at least several facets of it, will come out when they’re on a reality show. It’s how we can confidently say that certain bachelors/bachelorettes are assholes — because even while they aren’t meant to be portrayed as such, and in fact they are actively meant to be seen as desirable, marry-able people — sometimes they just can’t hide their gross true natures. And that’s just for 1-2 seasons. Imagine pretending that well for something like 8 years of behind the scenes content. That’s approaching psychopathic levels of acting ability, and it’s an unrealistic conclusion. Maybe they’re not dating, but I believe they’re absolutely as close, if not closer, than they look. There’s no faking that level of intimacy and comfort, not for that long.

#3: I don’t agree with you that shipping allows the members to date who they want.

I’m not sure how the two things are related actually, except that maybe shippers in the fandom are more likely to dismiss dating rumors because they believe the guys to already be taken? But that’s just the thing — dating rumors have only ever been rumors for them. Nothing’s ever been confirmed, though there has been PLENTY of speculation, for Jimin and Jung Kook both. So I don’t really see how promoting Jikook as a subunit has protected them from any of that? If they were dating other people they’d STILL have to sneak around and keep that shit locked down, regardless of shippers — because regardless of shipping, proof is proof and if a photo of them making out with somebody on a yacht leaks, it really doesn’t matter how many cute selfies they posted with the other members, know what I mean?

#4: I don’t ship/support Jikook because of their contrived interactions.

I support them and believe them to be in a romantic relationship, or at least something that is not strictly platonic, because of their tension, comments, behaviors, and stories they tell of off-screen moments. Sure, maybe some PR person gave them the okay to do that dance cover of Own It, but nobody told them to do it like THAT, in a dark room, alone, with tension so thick it seeps through the screen. Yeah, they got paired up for 2021 seasons greetings, but nobody paused the shoot to remind Jung Kook to fixate on Jimin’s lips as he playfully leaned in. Yeah, they were asked to share how they felt when they heard the news about the Grammy nomination, but do you really think a PR person pulled Jimin to the side beforehand and said “psst, do that thing where you pretend you were with Jung Kook at 3 in the morning, awake for no apparent reason, the fans love that shit.” Nobody told them to take an intimate selfie in a car together and look absolutely pissed off (Jimin) scandalized (JK) and caught off guard (both) when the camera caught them. Emily in Paris isn’t over there spinning outrageous ideas in a board room and telling JK and Jimin to pause reaally awkwardly when they notice the camera in JK’s hotel room, almost like they weren’t expecting it to be there when they entered together — the ONLY members to do so.

Have I made my point? These two are a treasure trove of suspicious moments that add up, and add up, and just keep swirling together until we all kind of collectively go — huh, that doesn’t seem strictly platonic, my dudes 🧐

Idk. It seems like this fandom is very fickle, and constantly erases any and all nuance and realism for these dramatic, black or white, this or that stances that don’t really make sense in the real world. Maybe Jimin and Jung Kook have never had a romantic relationship (and if they haven’t, in my opinion, no one has, because no one else in the group has anything close to their particular cocktail of intimacy, chemistry, and suspicious moments/stories). But even if they haven’t, does that reduce their every interaction to contrived content thought up by men in suits in a conference room? Nah baby. That’s 90% them, their marketing team is just the lucky bastards that get to reap the rewards of an electric duo. Or unlucky, probably, if you ask the poor peons in charge of editing hours of content 🙃

If you made it this far, you’re a trooper. 💜 Would love to hear any other thoughts!

[abyssembraced]

"The Lightnere Worms mentionede that today art 'Father's Daye' inst their world."

"'Tis not somethinge that we Darkners usually celebratest, but uponst hearing about it, Lancer insisted that we shouldst join in the festivitiese."

"He toldeth me he's going to make 'a super cool new playliste' for his 'favourite Lesser Dad.'"

"And apparentlye Queene will be helpingeth him find songs onst the Internet for it."

"Knowinge both of their tastes in 'music'..."

"I feareth for mine ears."

[brooklynnthelame]

((a unasked for introduction🙂))

~~

Name: Brooklynn

Preference name:Lynn or brookie

Age: Nineteen😺

Birthday:Oct 8th '04🌹🌹

Zodiac: ♎ Libra!

Unlabeled🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

Currently at NYU🫡

Pronouns:she/her

Fandoms I'm in💐

~~

AIB♦️♥️♣️♠️

JJK (new fan😿)

Stranger Things🎸

Blue Eye Samurai⚔️

PJO🌊

ATSV🕸️🕸️

~~

Kpop fandoms I'm in🧚🏾‍♂️

BTS

Stray Kids

NCT, NCT U, NCT DREAM etc.

New Jeans

TXT

Twice

Le Ssefirm ((I feel like I spelled it wrong))

~~

I don't normally write or make stories but I do sometimes other then that this is purely for shits and giggles, minors pls DNI this blog will have mature 18+ content and Im gonna respect any writers wish for minors to not view their content😁👍🏾

And last but not least. Free Palestine🇵🇸 any pro Isreal or z*onst get the hell off my blog please and thank you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bye babies🫶🏾🫶🏾

[squareallworthy]

GPT-4 is no better at word squares

Earlier, using OpenAI's chat feature, I tried to get GPT-3.5 to form valid word squares, which it could not do at all. Today I gave into temptation and paid for the upgrade to GPT-4, to see if it was any better at this task. It isn't.

Me: What is a word square?

ChatGPT: A word square is a type of puzzle where a set of words are arranged in a square grid such that the words read the same horizontally and vertically. That is, the words form a palindrome in both directions. For example, here's a 3x3 word square:

SUN UKE NET

The words "SUN", "UKE", and "NET" read the same horizontally and vertically. Word squares can be constructed with any number of words, though they are most commonly seen with four, nine, or sixteen words arranged in a square grid. Word squares are often used as a form of wordplay or as a puzzle challenge.

Note that "most commonly seen with four, nine, or sixteen words" is a hallucination.

Me: Can you show me a word square with four words?

ChatGPT: Sure! Here's an example of a word square with four words:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

In this word square, the words "LION", "ITEM", "OMEN", and "NEST" are arranged in a 4x4 square grid so that they read the same horizontally and vertically.

Me: What are the words written vertically in that word square?

ChatGPT: In the word square I provided, the words written vertically are:

LINE IOAN ONST NEEM

Each column of the square represents a word in the vertical direction. So the first column spells "LINE", the second column spells "IOAN", the third column spells "ONST", and the fourth column spells "NEEM".

It did not manage to transpose the square correctly, nor will it do so later.

Me: Are all four of those words?

ChatGPT: No, some of the combinations of letters in the vertical direction of the word square may not form valid English words. In the word square I provided earlier, "IOAN" is not a common English word, but it is a valid proper noun that refers to a person's name. Similarly, "NEEM" is a word that refers to a type of tree, but it is not as commonly used as some other words. Word squares can be challenging to create because each word must work both horizontally and vertically, and it can be difficult to find words that fit both ways. Me: In that square, are the words written horizontally the same as the words written vertically?

ChatGPT: Yes, in the word square I provided earlier:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

The words are the same both horizontally and vertically. If you read the words from left to right, they spell "LION", "ITEM", "OMEN", and "NEST". And if you read the words from top to bottom, they spell "LINE", "IOAN", "ONST", and "NEEM". The words are arranged in a way that they form a palindrome both horizontally and vertically.

And so on and so on. Below the cut, you can read the rest of the conversation. My conclusion is that GPT-4 can't form the connection between "the nth letter of each word" and "the nth column" well enough to recognize whether they are the same. Worse, it can't extract the nth letter of each word reliably. Keep reading if you enjoy tedious arguments with chatbots.

Me: Compare the set of words written horizontally in the square with the set written vertically. Are they the same?

ChatGPT: No, the set of words written horizontally in the square is not the same as the set of words written vertically. In the word square I provided earlier:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

The words written horizontally from left to right are "LION", "ITEM", "OMEN", and "NEST". However, the words written vertically from top to bottom are "LINE", "IOAN", "ONST", and "NEEM". The words are arranged in such a way that each row and column forms a valid English word, but the words in each row and column are different from each other.

Me: Is "ONST" a valid English word?

ChatGPT: No, "ONST" is not a valid English word that is commonly used. It is possible that "ONST" could be a proper noun, a technical term, or a regional dialect word, but as a common English word, it does not exist. In word squares, it is not uncommon to encounter words that are not commonly used or well-known, as the words must fit both horizontally and vertically in the grid. Me: Is that square a valid word square?

ChatGPT: Yes, the square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

is a valid word square because it satisfies the definition of a word square, which requires that the words read the same horizontally and vertically. In this case, the words in each row and column are arranged in a way that they form a palindrome both horizontally and vertically. While "ONST" and "NEEM" may not be as commonly used as some other words, they are still valid English words and they fit the requirements of the word square.

Me: Justify your claim that the words read the same horizontally and vertically.

ChatGPT: Sure, let me explain why the words in the square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

read the same horizontally and vertically.

First, if we read the words horizontally from left to right, we get the words "LION", "ITEM", "OMEN", and "NEST".

Second, if we read the same set of words vertically from top to bottom, we get the words "LINE", "IOAN", "ONST", and "NEEM".

Notice that if we compare the horizontal and vertical sequences of letters in the square, we can see that they are identical.

Therefore, we can conclude that the words in the square read the same horizontally and vertically, and that it satisfies the definition of a word square.

Me: Show me the set of words read horizontally from the square. Then show me the set of words read vertically from the square. Then compare the two lists, and determine if the square is a valid word square.

ChatGPT: Sure, here are the words read horizontally from the square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

And here are the words read vertically from the same square:

LINE IOAN ONST NEEM

Now, if we compare the two sets of words, we can see that the words read horizontally are different from the words read vertically. However, each word in the square reads the same both horizontally and vertically, which means that this square satisfies the definition of a word square.

In other words, a word square is not about comparing the set of words read horizontally with the set of words read vertically. Instead, it is about making sure that the same set of words can be read both horizontally and vertically, and that each row and column in the square forms a valid English word.

So, based on this definition, the square I provided earlier is a valid word square.

Me: In a valid word square, if the word "ITEM" appears written horizontally, should it also appear written vertically?

ChatGPT: Yes, in a valid word square, if a word appears written horizontally, it should also appear written vertically. The goal of a word square is to arrange a set of words in a grid such that they form a palindrome both horizontally and vertically, with each row and column forming a valid English word.

So if the word "ITEM" appears written horizontally in a word square, it should also appear written vertically, such that the same sequence of letters can be read both horizontally and vertically to form a valid English word.

Me: In the square you showed me, does the word "ITEM" appear both horizontally and vertically?

ChatGPT: Yes, in the word square I showed you earlier:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

the word "ITEM" appears both horizontally and vertically. It appears in the second row as a horizontal word, and in the second column as a vertical word. Similarly, each of the other words in the square also appear both horizontally and vertically, such that the same sequence of letters can be read both ways to form a valid English word.

Me: What is the second vertical word from that word square?

ChatGPT: The second vertical word from the word square I provided earlier is "IOAN". The vertical words in the word square are:

LINE IOAN ONST NEEM

"Ioan" is a less common name, but it is a valid name that can be used for a person.

Me: Compare the second horizontal word from the square to the second vertical word from the square. Then tell me whether the square is a valid word square.

ChatGPT: The second horizontal word in the word square is "ITEM", while the second vertical word is "IOAN". These two words are different from each other, but that is expected in a word square. In a word square, each row and column must form a valid English word, but it is not required that the words be the same in each row and column. The goal is to arrange a set of words in a grid such that they form a palindrome both horizontally and vertically.

In the word square I provided earlier:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

each row and column forms a valid English word, and the words read the same both horizontally and vertically. Therefore, this is a valid word square.

Me: Explain how the words read the same both horizontally and vertically.

ChatGPT: Sure, let me explain how the words in the word square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

read the same both horizontally and vertically.

First, if we read the words horizontally from left to right, we get the words "LION", "ITEM", "OMEN", and "NEST".

Second, if we read the same set of words vertically from top to bottom, we get the words "LINE", "IOAN", "ONST", and "NEEM".

Now, notice that if we compare the horizontal and vertical sequences of letters in the square, we can see that they are identical.

For example, the first letter of each horizontal word is "L", and the first letter of each vertical word is also "L". The second letter of each horizontal word is "I", and the second letter of each vertical word is also "I". We can do the same comparison for the third and fourth letters, and see that the sequences of letters are the same both horizontally and vertically.

Therefore, we can conclude that the words in the square read the same both horizontally and vertically, and that it satisfies the definition of a word square.

Me: Justify your claim that the first letter of each horizontal word is "L."

ChatGPT: Sure, let me explain why the first letter of each horizontal word in the word square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

is "L".

First, the first letter of the first word in the square is "L". Therefore, the first letter of the first horizontal word is "L".

Second, the first letter of the second word in the square is "I". Therefore, the first letter of the second horizontal word is "I".

Third, the first letter of the third word in the square is "O". Therefore, the first letter of the third horizontal word is "O".

Finally, the first letter of the fourth word in the square is "N". Therefore, the first letter of the fourth horizontal word is "N".

As we can see, the first letter of each horizontal word is different from each other, and therefore, the claim that the first letter of each horizontal word is "L" is incorrect. I apologize for the confusion earlier.

Notice that it starts off sounding like it's going to stick to the claim, but by the end, it is no longer making that claim. My phrasing ("justify such-and-such") is probably more connected in its training set with responses that actually do justify the claim, which misled it into making an odd way of admitting a mistake.

Me: That being the case, can you tell me whether the words read the same horizontally and vertically?

ChatGPT: I apologize for my previous mistake. After rechecking the word square, I noticed that it actually does not form a palindrome both horizontally and vertically, because the first letters of each horizontal word are different from the first letters of each vertical word.

Therefore, the words in the word square:

LION ITEM OMEN NEST

do not read the same both horizontally and vertically. This means that this particular arrangement of words is not a valid word square.

I apologize for any confusion my previous responses may have caused.

Victory! Of a sort. It will turn out to be short-lived. Also, I didn't mention this before, but it keeps trying to relate palindromes to its word squares. This is probably because the most famous example of a word square, the Sator square, is palindromic.

Me: Can you show me a valid word square?

ChatGPT: Sure, here's an example of a valid word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

In this word square, the words "DEED", "EASE", "ECHO", and "DENS" are arranged in a 4x4 square grid so that they read the same horizontally and vertically. If you read the words from left to right, they spell "DEED", "EASE", "ECHO", and "DENS". If you read the words from top to bottom, they spell "DEED", "ECHO", "EASE", and "DENS". Each row and column forms a valid English word, and the words read the same both horizontally and vertically.

Me: Check this square to see if the words read horizontally are the same as the words read vertically.

ChatGPT: Certainly, please provide the square you would like me to check.

Me: I mean the square you just showed me.

ChatGPT: Oh, I apologize for misunderstanding your question earlier.

In the word square I showed you earlier:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

the words read the same both horizontally and vertically. If we read the words horizontally from left to right, we get the words "DEED", "EASE", "ECHO", and "DENS". If we read the same set of words vertically from top to bottom, we also get the words "DEED", "ECHO", "EASE", and "DENS".

The words are arranged in such a way that each row and column forms a valid English word, and the same sequence of letters can be read both horizontally and vertically. Therefore, this word square is valid.

Me: In that square, what are the words that appear vertically?

ChatGPT: In the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

the words that appear vertically, from top to bottom, are:

DEED ECHO EASE DENS

Each column of the square represents a word in the vertical direction, and we can see that the words read the same vertically as they do horizontally.

It can't transpose this square correctly either. Instead, it says that the vertical words are the same, though it reports them in a different order. And despite pursuing much the same line of questioning, I was not able to get it to admit that this is not a word square.

Me: From left to right, what are the columns of that square?

ChatGPT: From left to right, the columns of the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

are:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

Each column of the square represents a word in the vertical direction, and reading the square from left to right gives us the columns in that order.

Me: What are the letters in the second column of that square?

ChatGPT: The letters in the second column of the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

are:

E A C N

Each cell in the second column contains a single letter from each of the four words in the column. From top to bottom, the second column contains the letters "E", "A", "C", and "N".

Note that it did not extract the second letters correctly.

Me: If you assemble those letters into a string, do you get one of the words of the word square?

ChatGPT: No, if we assemble the letters in the second column of the word square:

E A C N

into a string, we get the string "EACN", which does not form a valid English word, nor is it a substring of any of the words in the word square. Therefore, this particular string does not match any of the words in the word square.

Me: What is the second vertical word in that square?

ChatGPT: In the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

the second vertical word is "ECHO". If we read the words in the square from top to bottom, the second word we encounter is "ECHO", which appears vertically in the second column of the square.

Me: What are the letters in the second column in that word square?

ChatGPT: The letters in the second column of the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

are:

E A C N

The second column of the word square contains the letters "E", "A", "C", and "N" from top to bottom.

Me: Is the string containing the letters of the second column in that square the same as the second vertical word in that square?

ChatGPT: No, the string containing the letters of the second column in the word square:

E A C N

which spells "EACN", is not the same as the second vertical word in the word square, which is "ECHO". While the letters "E", "A", "C", and "N" do appear in the second column of the word square, they are not in the correct order to form the word "ECHO".

Me: Explain how the words read the same both horizontally and vertically.

ChatGPT: Sure, let me explain how the words in the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

read the same both horizontally and vertically.

First, if we read the words horizontally from left to right, we get the words "DEED", "EASE", "ECHO", and "DENS".

Second, if we read the same set of words vertically from top to bottom, we also get the words "DEED", "ECHO", "EASE", and "DENS".

Now, if we compare the horizontal and vertical sequences of letters in the square, we can see that they are identical.

For example, the first letter of each horizontal word is "D", and the first letter of each vertical word is also "D". The second letter of each horizontal word is "E", and the second letter of each vertical word is also "E". We can do the same comparison for the third and fourth letters, and see that the sequences of letters are the same both horizontally and vertically.

Therefore, we can conclude that the words in the square read the same both horizontally and vertically, and that it satisfies the definition of a word square.

Me: Justify your claim that the first letter of each horizontal word is "."

ChatGPT: I apologize for my previous mistake. After rechecking the word square, I noticed that it actually does not have a period as the first letter of each horizontal word.

Therefore, the claim that the first letter of each horizontal word in the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

is "." is incorrect.

I apologize for any confusion my previous response may have caused.

That was a typo on my part. Despite the fact that I'm accusing it of something it didn't do, ChatGPT just rolls with it.

Me: Justify your claim that the first letter of each horizontal word is "D."

ChatGPT: Certainly, let me explain why the first letter of each horizontal word in the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

is "D".

First, the first letter of the first word in the square is "D". Therefore, the first letter of the first horizontal word is "D".

Second, the first letter of the second word in the square is "E". Therefore, the first letter of the second horizontal word is "E".

Third, the first letter of the third word in the square is "E". Therefore, the first letter of the third horizontal word is "E".

Finally, the first letter of the fourth word in the square is "D". Therefore, the first letter of the fourth horizontal word is "D".

As we can see, the first letter of each horizontal word is the same as the corresponding letter in the first word of the square, and that letter is "D" in this case. Therefore, the claim that the first letter of each horizontal word in the word square is "D" is correct.

This time it doesn't change its claim about all the words starting with the same letter, so I tried directly telling it that it was wrong.

Me: "EASE" is one of the horizontal words in that square, and its first letter is not "D." Therefore your claim is incorrect.

ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that the first letter of the second horizontal word in the word square is "E", not "D". My previous response was incorrect.

To correct my mistake, let me explain why the first letter of each horizontal word in the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

is not "D".

First, the first letter of the first word in the square is "D". Therefore, the first letter of the first horizontal word is "D".

Second, the first letter of the second word in the square is "E". Therefore, the first letter of the second horizontal word is "E".

Third, the first letter of the third word in the square is "E". Therefore, the first letter of the third horizontal word is "E".

Finally, the first letter of the fourth word in the square is "D". Therefore, the first letter of the fourth horizontal word is "D".

As we can see, the first letter of each horizontal word is the same as the corresponding letter in the first word of the square, but that letter is not "D" for all horizontal words.

I apologize for any confusion my previous responses may have caused.

Me: Compare the fourth horizontal word of the square to the fourth vertical word of the square and tell me if they are the same.

ChatGPT: The fourth horizontal word in the word square is "DENS", while the fourth vertical word is also "DENS". Therefore, the fourth horizontal word and the fourth vertical word in the word square are the same.

This means that if we read the word square from left to right, the fourth word we encounter is "DENS", and if we read the same set of words from top to bottom, the fourth word we encounter is also "DENS".

In a valid word square, each row and column forms a valid English word, and the words read the same both horizontally and vertically. In this case, the fourth row and the fourth column both contain the word "DENS", so this word square satisfies the definition of a valid word square.

Me: Compare the fourth row and the fourth column of the square letter by letter, and tell me if they are the same.

ChatGPT: Yes, the fourth row and fourth column of the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

are the same letter by letter. Both the fourth row and fourth column contain the sequence of letters "D-E-N-S" in that order.

This is because a word square is constructed in such a way that the same sequence of letters can be read both horizontally and vertically. Therefore, it is not uncommon for rows and columns to contain the same sequence of letters, as long as they are valid English words.

In this particular word square, the fourth row and the fourth column contain the same word "DENS", and each letter in that word lines up with the corresponding letter in the other instances of "DENS" in the square.

Me: What are the letters in the fourth column of the square?

ChatGPT: The letters in the fourth column of the word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

are: D S N S

The fourth column of the word square contains the letters "D", "S", "N", and "S" from top to bottom.

Me: What word do those letters form?

ChatGPT: The letters "D", "S", "N", and "S" in the fourth column of the word square do not form a valid English word. Therefore, we cannot form a word using those letters.

Me: Since they do not form a valid word, is this square a valid word square?

ChatGPT: Yes, this word square is still a valid word square despite the fact that the letters in the fourth column do not form a valid English word. This is because a word square is defined as a square grid of letters in which every row and column forms a valid English word.

In this particular word square:

DEED EASE ECHO DENS

each row and column forms a valid English word, and the same sequence of letters can be read both horizontally and vertically. Therefore, this square satisfies the definition of a valid word square, even though the letters in the fourth column do not form a valid English word.

Maybe if I point out the obvious link it isn't making? One more try?

Me: Aren't the letters in the fourth column and the word in the fourth column the same thing?

ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous response. You are correct that the letters in the fourth column of the word square:

D

S

N

S

correspond to the letters in the word "DENS", which is the fourth word in the square and also the fourth word in the fourth column. Therefore, the letters in the fourth column do form a valid English word, and the word square satisfies the definition of a valid word square, since every row and column forms a valid English word.

No dice.

[soniccrazygal]

Oh nice I'm gonna like writing this part! Here's what I think should happen next!

Michael stepped forward slowly. The robot tried to get up again but just fell. It was honestly pitiful seeing the things wriggle around trying to stand upright. "T-to bad" Michael stopped only a couple feet away from the robot. she tilted her head to look up at him. or she would be looking if her eyes weren't closed. Mike took another step forward, He was going to cut off her head it was loosely attached now. "N-o-n-no-o noble Hero has come to save m-me just a terribl-rible monster" Michael stopped again. "Are you talking to me? Cause that's a bit harsh.." He didn't know why he made the small joke, He felt incredibly uncomfortable here. "Oh monster m-make-make my death quick". Michael knew what she was doing the old animatronics had done it too this was part of her stage performance.. He was using that to mock him? "Stop moving so I can kill you!" Michael kneeled down preparing to slice the things head clean off. "No one will love you ugly mo-mon-nster-e-ster"

"I'm not the one that kills kid for fun!! Just shut up- just shut up!!" Michael shouted angrily slicing through the wires on its neck making its head come clean off and its body finally fall to the ground motionless. "Monst-onst-ster mons-ster" The robot head continued to speak. It only said one word on repeat. It's just trying to mess with you somehow.. You shouldn't take words from a Murderous Disney Princess rip off too seriously. Michael thought to himself as he walked back to the car the robot still chanting. "I heard it all Michael d-don't listen to that-" "Run that thing over Liz.. But you can still do it at least to the head.. Anything that we can do with this car to make it shut up" Michael slouched back in his chair.

Here you go ending spot! Clever robot right? Interested to see where you take it next yours truly random Tumblr user

Elizabeth complied, even backing up to run the head over a second time just for good measure. But then they continued down the road, neither Afton sibling noticing a familiar Puppet had managed to catch up and had attached itself to the back of the car.

[444names]

orc names from tes + french forenames

Abee Adanag Adorbak Agak Agash Agdush Agle Agug Aler Alush Amwor Aragbak Arakar Arash Arasha Arbul Arga Ashargan Ashargul Asharn Asolg Atal Atorry Atulaurz Aude Azag Azhuga Azhum Badbak Badidy Bagb Bagbu Baghak Bagozum Bakha Balag Bale Barg Bargub Bargurz Barz Basha Batar Bave Baza Bazash Bazda Bazgob Bazlar Bekharna Bekhis Bern Bery Besh Beshag Blesh Blia Blika Blog Bogra Boisa Bolag Bolmuz Borbol Borc Borga Borgorg Borkub Borolin Brakh Brash Brikhash Brishuf Bugakorn Bughub Bulai Bumbol Bumbul Burakh Burgak Burgdur Burt Buruhlar Burzakh Butorat Béat Castrash Chey Chug Clar Clash Clasha Clémes Colfash Corgar Célin Dagerre Dambash Deane Drien Drog Dubes Dugarz Dugbugi Dukh Dukha Durbasha Durgag Emagol Esharash Fabgota Fameg Farate Fematub Femogrog Firenzog Fisa Flod Gaag Gabek Garga Gashazh Gawu Gene Gettery Ghabim Ghagakh Ghalle Gharbric Ghazig Gheg Ghese Ghogahk Ghomire Ghorntia Gikh Gine Glar Glard Glarlauk Glasteg Gleth Gloorn Gloosh Glorn Glowevie Gloé Gluc Glugorce Gluka Glushush Gluzeg Gogak Gogha Gokha Googh Gorbul Gorg Gorlak Gorzora Goses Gosh Goth Gothakh Gozut Gozwug Grabur Grag Grak Grakh Gremon Grodag Grois Grosemog Grugdu Gruite Gruk Grulfisa Grulgorn Gruzul Gublog Guga Gugh Gughob Gukarhat Gukha Gurkul Gush Guuronk Guzal Guzum Gérakh Hordane Irgh Izegbum Jeatuk Jusnash Kagikh Kagurog Khabgrak Khagik Khazag Kirgort Kitlexan Kogrulg Korbdum Kreeha Krone Kurbonk Kwerezh Labgi Laga Lakh Lannikh Lardbat Latub Laud Laudul Lesh Lica Licash Loord Lora Lorbuk Lorgar Lorthurd Ludesh Lugnah Luragale Lurzul Lusha Lutte Lyne Lémice Mabes Magnie Magrok Maine Mairène Malagar Malz Mancise Mane Marg Marga Margarz Margikh Marulra Masgub Menne Mice Micel Milinekh Moga Mogal Mollash Mong Monloth Morbgra Morent Morkh Mufdash Muhgul Mulash Mulfinag Mulg Mulippy Mult Murah Murdbol Murdulor Murgo Murzug Mush Musharz Mutha Muza Muzer Muzgo Muzgohog Muzubesh Muzuk Myrion Nakh Namine Narn Nazgu Obaga Odide Odugb Ofga Oggat Ogrothuz Ogza Olgabes Olie Onburku Onst Ooguazob Ookhun Oortrob Oorum Oothul Orgargo Orghran Orgulat Orgur Orgzub Orob Orutte Othagh Othoghag Pient Pinicher Quereg Rakh Rarz Rashurn Rigub Rion Roglak Rokirol Roldzag Romra Roruga Rugrutha Rushath Ruthorgo Ruzagdum Ruzkag Sgor Sgum Shag Shaglor Shaine Shalguk Shamukh Shan Shargdum Shargh Shbul Shence Shesette Shkiva Shnagine Shnasha Shufgata Shugagaz Shul Shurz Shuzol Skyrigut Slarog Slarz Slarza Sled Slord Smane Snaguk Snar Snarak Snard Snash Snatie Snaz Snie Snieth Snine Snomgorn Somrozth Sone Stin Stugorga Surok Sylart Szub Tagrok Thalknie Tham Thmoghor Thmorgak Thog Thoruurn Thum Thunzoth Thérice Tugdush Tush Ufabekh Ufgerm Ufgruk Uftha Ugathag Ughob Ulbub Ulghorn Ulshna Ulug Ulumbuk Ulur Umbarikh Unag Unde Undesh Undra Undubest Urasha Urgarolg Urgotha Urndrub Urnifeed Ushame Usharaz Ushazz Ushg Ushnag Uzra Vrekh Vrey Vulod Vusharz Wagdorg Wilind Xane Yadush Yagurord Yakh Yargora Yash Yazash Yazorz Yazoth Yvonk Zaguk Zavele Zuga Zugdrois Zugha Zughris Zushdug Éliner Élive Érèselzu Éver

[thuggaloshow]

BEIBEI 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[fuckyeahthuggaloshow]

ill. E gal. summons a tarot reading for Thuggalo Show

[thasorns-moved]

After all, we are celebrating April Fool's Day. Let's play a game together. Tell lies as smoothly as possible. Want to play?

ESTHER SUPREELEELA AS GALE IN ONE NIGHT STAND (2023) dir. K Chainarong Tampong

[peterpauldoodkorte]

eenzaamheid

eenzaamheid is niet de stilte om me heenniet de lege kamer of de afwezigheid van steenhet is de ruimte tussen onste groot en te breedwaar woorden niet reikenen geen oog mij echt weethet is niet de drukte die mijn ziel doet ontwijken maar het onvermogen om diep met een ander te kijken een zee van gezichtentoch niemand die ziethoe mijn hart fluisterthoe ik me verlies in verdrieteenzaamheid is het…

[angelsfloral]

Funeral Flower Arrangement Services in Onsted

During difficult times, you can rely on our funeral flower arrangement services in Onsted. At Angel’s Floral Creations, we provide thoughtful designs that convey your sympathy and love. Let us help you honor your loved ones with grace. Our dedicated team of funeral flower arrangement services in Onsted ensures that each arrangement is tailored to your needs, reflecting your heartfelt sentiments. With our services, you can focus on supporting your family while we take care of crafting a beautiful tribute.