#not included are disability protections and racial equality
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
wheelingwithgrace · 4 months ago
Text
I'm as pro-life, conservative, and Catholic as they come, but in this election, I'm voting for Kamala Harris. There is no doubt in my mind. Economically, financially, socially, I have to.
Looking at Trump's time in office and his administration vs. Kamala
Trump, on multiple occasions, tried to get rid of the affordable care act
Trump cut down on medicaid
Trump administration had proposals to reduce social security and supplemental security income
Trump's budget proposals included SNAP (food stamps)
Gave tax cuts to corporations
Trump opposed raising the minimum wage
Trump has had multiple sexual assault/harrassment allegations against him during and after his time in office
During covid-19, Trump downplayed the virus and resisted public health efforts
Although I am pro-life and I believe life begings at conception and many values align with those traditionally seen in Catholicism, I truly believe that the extremist bans many conservative politicians are proposing can and will affect not only healthcare access but also the quality which is already not the greatest for women in particular. For example, I am being Catholic, I do not particularly agree with using contraceptives. However, I myself do take birth control pills for medical reasons. I worry that my right to take them could be affected by bans that are being proposed by politicians.
Furthermore, I do not agree with Trump's actions or his character. Being a disabled woman, he has done harmful things.
In 2015, he mocked a disabled journalist, Serge Kovaleski
He has, on many occasions, compared women to "fat pigs" and "dogs"
Many or most of us are aware of his comment stating to "grab her by the p**sy"
He has referred to African nations has "shithole countries"
During his time in office, he prevented transgender people from serving in the military
Let's look at some of the things Kamala has done and supported
Advocated for healthcare access and protecting disability rights
Supported economic policies aimed at the working class
Addresses racial inequality, police and criminal justice reforms
Advocates for women's rights, including but not limited to childcare, workplace equality, and gender equality
I'm not saying that Kamala is the greatest politician in existence. Her track record as a district attorney can most certainly attest for that. She's had her problematic moments, but we can find that in essentially every politician. Not a single one of them will be perfect. But if we look at the bigger picture and compare them, I'd rather take my chances on Kamala.
28 notes · View notes
buttacake80 · 18 days ago
Text
I wanna expand on that 13% of the population that I am a part of.
Most Black Americans are the descendants of enslaved Africans stolen between 1618-1808.
Race is a social construct, and in our construction, possessing one drop of Black blood meant you were Black.
This man was considered Black.
Tumblr media
He served as the leader of the NAACP at one time. He posed as white to infiltrate racist organizations. Of his 64 great-great-great-great-grandparents, 5 were Black.
To white folks, we are perceived as lazy & and stupid, yet it was their ancestors who went to a foreign land to steal millions of people to do manual labor.
Slavery existed for centuries. Ending in 1865 after a Civil War. There was a period of Reconstruction in which there was a genuine effort to make things equal, but the white folks rebelled and started burning down our neighborhoods and lynching us for minor transgressions.
There were laws & policies in place to try to redress that wrong, but Trump has taken steps to remove those protections.
Despite being only 13% of the population, Black folk are the main constructors of American cultural identity. It's our music, slang, food, mannerisms, humor, etc. that folks associate with Americans. We dominate in sports.
We use our own language called African American (vernacular) English. Even Elon Musk uses AAVE in his speech.
We are vilified while also emulated. White folks have stolen aspects of our culture then taken active steps to remove us from it. Re: Country Music
A lot of white people feel that because of their white skin, they deserve preferential treatment. That a white dude with no college education should have every opportunity to thrive.
Sadly, a lot of white Americans have "Temporary Broke Billionaire Syndrome" or TBBS. They will vote for billionaires, despite not having a million, because they believe they are one lottery ticket away from becoming a Billionaire. 🙄
Meanwhile, Black folks buckle down and get our degrees.
Let me address Affirmative Action because a lot of white folks are just plain ignorant.
The largest group to benefit from Affirmative Action has been white women.
The current largest groups include VETERANS and the DISABLED. Note that there are no racial categories there.
White folks spun it that unqualified Black folk were stealing their spots.
As someone who sat on a college admissions committee and drafted a Native American student recruitment plan, that's not how it works.
Affirmative Action does not take the least qualified Black person to put in a spot that was reserved for a white person, but that is how white folks viewed it.
Instead, Affirmative Action refers to taking affirmative action to build a workplace or educational institution that reflects greater American society. Quotas are illegal which means no employer or college was allowed to say, there are 13% Black folk so we must have 13% student population. That was illegal but white folks believed otherwise.
So they mobilized to strike down Affirmative Action in education which impacts veterans, rural white folk (who were also part of Affirmative Action plans), disabled, LGBTQI, and first generation Americans.
Now, they are destroying every "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" or DEI programs just to remove Black folk from spaces. If they had their way, they would strip us of our citizenship and put us back into shackles.
This is all to say that white folks voted against Harris simply because she was a Black woman. They wanted a fascist because he would do the dirty work of putting us in our place.
7 notes · View notes
cosmicluci · 4 months ago
Text
Weird rant-y post, because I was just thinking about it.
But you know International Crimes? They’ve been a sadly very recent topic, showing up on the news a lot. They appear in fiction all the time. People talk about them.
They are Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, and Crimes of Aggression. They’re also the crimes tried by the International Criminal Court, and defined in the Rome Statute. We’ve all heard about them.
The thing that annoys and concerns me is that a whole lot of people tend to mix them up, and I think it’s important to know the differences.
First, Crimes of Aggression are basically starting a war. One country attacking another country. That’s different from War Crimes, but I’ll talk about those later.
Big confusion people make is between Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity:
Genocide is acts taken purposefully to destroy in whole or in part a group. The international definition lists National, Ethnic, Racial, and Religious groups, but based on a consideration made during one of the trials in the ICTR all the way back in 1998, about the spirit of that law, it’s reasonable to consider it as encompassing any group that is similarly “Stable and Permanent”. This means it does necessarily include, say, regional groups, disabled people, and any part or all of the LGBTQ+ community. But it is purposefully about destroying a group, and it is always directed and specific.
Crimes Against Humanity, on the other hand, is about widespread and/or systematic attacks directed at a civilian population. This doesn’t always require specific intent, and it can be a lot more generalized. It also includes political persecution, and group persecution that isn’t necessarily about destruction. Apartheid is a Crime Against Humanity.
An important detail is that in no way is a Crime Against Humanity less severe, less heinous, less serious, than a Genocide. They’re both heinous. They’re often at equal levels of horror. Heck, a Crime Against Humanity can often have its own special types of cruelty. This is where you most commonly (though not exclusively) get state-sanctioned torture, or oppression lasting for decades or even hundreds of years. So let’s also not treat this as a lesser crime. It’s super duper not.
The next big difference is that Genocide and CAH are not War Crimes. I’ve seen a lot of people calling them that, or saying that people convicted for Genocide and CAH were convicted for war crimes. This one is troubling because it also creates the mistaken impression that those things happen in war, or that they’re always tied to war. That’s a HUGE mistake. As much as they’re often covered up with war, or people use war as an opportunity or justification to commit those crimes, they can just as much happen when there’s no war. And even when there is a war, those crimes don’t favor or are necessary for a war effort (of course, the perpetrators do like framing it as such, but we really shouldn’t put a lot of trust into what perpetrators say to justify their atrocities).
War Crimes are acts committed in violation of the rules about means and methods, and about protected persons, places, and objects, in a context of armed conflict. That’s a specific set of rules. This is also different from starting the war. A country can technically start an aggressive war (Crime of Aggression) and not commit war crimes, just as a country can take part in a war legally (for example, in self defense), but take actions that constitute War Crimes.
Another quick detail is that an act can be more than one thing. And similar acts taken in different contexts can be different crimes.
I doubt anyone will read this post, or read it this far. But if someone does, keep all of this in mind when looking at real world news. Israel, for example, hasn’t committed a Crime of Aggression against Palestine, but is committing Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, and Genocide. Some of those for way longer than the current conflict. Russia, on the other hand, committed a Crime of Aggression, and I’d argue all the others as well (long story about Genocide. We don’t usually hear about that, or about the hate rhetoric coming from Russia about Ukraine. Won’t go into it now. But there’s some troubling evidence that there very much is also a Genocide there).
Also think about it when we see it in fiction! Thanos in the MCU didn’t commit a genocide. His attack was generalized, unspecific, and undirected. He killed indiscriminately. It’s a Crime Against Humanity (or, I guess, in that case, not humanity? Maybe a Crime Against Sentiency. Not a Genocide, though).
In Star Wars, the Empire commits multiple genocides (in that case, a planetary group can be considered), as well as Crimes Against Sentiency in its oppression of populations. The Jedi Purge was a genocide as well. Meanwhile, we see Republic forces committing War Crimes (such as when they use the tactic of false surrender to lull CIS forces into a massacre, or the use of an enslaved army, or the recruitment of children), and even Genocide against the Geonosians. We do also have CIS forces committing international (or…interplanetary?) crimes, mind you. Especially Crimes Against Sentiency, attacking and oppressing civilian populations, or War Crimes as they use torture.
In Star Trek DS9, when the Cardassians enact a systematic and widespread oppression of the Bajorans, that’s a Crime Against Sentiency. But when they decide they should exterminate them, that’s Genocide. The Dominion trying to exterminate Cardassians is also Genocide. And when the Romulans hid weapons in their hospital base, that’s a War Crime.
10 notes · View notes
ryanthedemiboy · 7 months ago
Text
I knew Project 2025 was bad. I knew that going in.
I'm on page 5 of 900.
This is so much fucking worse than I thought.
Within the first year, they want to remove all bills involving gender, sexuality, reproductive care, contraception of all kinds, all equality bills (gender/women's, sexuality, disability, racial, removing non-white men's right to vote, everything), ban everything trans, convict educators and librarians who even mention transgenderism as sex offenders, lock up anyone trans and who mentions transgenderism, and on.
Again: I'm on page five
You. Need. To. Vote. We need to put everything into getting people to vote. It is so fucking bad. Your voice matters. Even if it doesn't, oh darn you wasted your time.
Oh, Biden's genocidal? Yeah, Trump is going to roll back every protection for everybody in the first year. Including the right to protest.
With Biden, we can protest. If Trump gets elected, we can't.
Vote as if your life depends on it, because there is not an insignificant chance that it does.
17 notes · View notes
jeremyfuscaldo · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
Rest in Power, Jimmy Carter (1924-2024), During his Presidency, he gave the American People the Department of Education to protect generations of students & teachers. He was also known for his advocation to protect the environment and strengthen Climate Change prevention policies, emphasized humanitarian and peace efforts throughout the world, including efforts to help both the Israeli and Palestinian communities around the world. And after his Presidency came to an end, he continued the good work of helping make the world a better place. The Department of Education was especially one of his greatest achievements because it helped lead the way for other Presidents lead bipartisan efforts to improve educational quality for students and teachers of all genders, disabilities, racial communities. According to it's article on wikipedia, it's main functions are as follows:
Establishing policies on federal financial aid for education and distributing as well as monitoring those funds.
Collecting data on America's schools and disseminating research.
Focusing national attention on key educational issues.
Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.
With the Trump Administration's plan to shut it down-- now is the time to protect it for future students. Without both these safeguards or the Department of Education, generations of children will be neglected and will be put at risk. The Department was such a vital safe guard of education that even previous Presidents of both Political parties understood it's role and the need to preserve it for future students. Please do what you can to honor Jimmy Carter's memory and save the Department of Education!
5 notes · View notes
insert-witty-user-name-here · 8 months ago
Text
10+ Good Things Biden has Done: Education & Immigration Edition
Just a list of 10+ good things Biden has done in the last 4 years because I’ve been hearing too much rhetoric that it doesn’t matter who you vote for. It does make a difference. 
Find more good things here, here, and here.
Canceled over $140B of student debt for nearly 40 million borrowers. (x)
Strengthened protections for sexual assault survivors, pregnant and parenting students, and LGBTQ+ students in schools through an updated Title IX rule. This updated rule strengthens sexual assault survivors rights to investigation– something that had been gutted under the Trump administration, strengthens requirements that schools provide modifications for students based on pregnancy, prohibits harassment based on sexual orientation or gender identity, and more. (x) 
Revoked an order that limited diversity and inclusion training. (x)
Cracked down on for profit colleges. (x)
Reaffirmed students’ federal civil rights protections for non-discrimination based on race, national origin, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender in schools. Specifically, the Department of Education made clear students with disabilities’ right to school, limiting the use of out of school suspensions and expulsions against them. (x) (x) 
Enhanced the Civil Rights Data Collection, a national survey that captures data on students’ equal access to educational opportunities. These changes will improve the tracking of civil rights violations for students, critical for advocates to respond to instances of discrimination. 
Provided guidance on how colleges and universities can still uphold racial diversity in higher education following the Supreme Court decision overturning affirmative action. (x)
Designated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) status for immigrants from Cameroon, Haiti, ​​El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua, Sudan, and more. (x) 
Ended the discriminatory Muslim and African bans (x). 
Provided a pathway to citizenship for spouses of U.S. citizens that have been living in the country without documentation. (x) 
Expanded healthcare to DACA recipients (x) 
This one is… barely a win but not by fault of the Biden Administration. The Department of Homeland Security as of Feb 2023 has reunited nearly 700 immigrant children that were separated from their families under Trump’s Zero Tolerance Policy. From 2017-2021, 3,881 children were separated from their families. About 74% of those have been reunited with their families: 2,176 before the task force was created and 689 afterward. But that still leaves nearly 1,000 children who remain tragically separated from their families from under the Trump Administration. (x)
(okay this one is maybe only exciting for me who’s a census nerd) Revised federal standards for the collection of race and ethnicity data, allowing for federal data that better reflect the country’s diversity. Now, government forms will include a Middle Eastern/ North African category (when previously those individuals would check “white”). Additionally, forms will now have combined the race & ethnicity question allowing for individuals to check “Latino/a” as their race (previously Latine individuals would be encouraged to check “Latino” for ethnicity and “white” for race… which doesn’t really resonate with many folks). (x) (I know this sounds boring but let me tell you this is BIG when it comes to better data collection– and better advocacy!).
Rescinded a Trump order that would have excluded undocumented immigrants from the 2020 Census which would have taken away critical funds from those communities.
Has proposed investments in a lot of programs including universal pre-k, childcare, mental health programs in schools, a national medical leave program for all workers and more. (x) 
Last… let’s also not forget all the truly terrible things Trump did when he was in office. If you need a reminder, scroll this list, this one mostly for giggles + horror, for actual horror about what a Trump presidency has in store, learn about ‘Project 2025’ from the Heritage Foundation. I know this post is about reasons to vote FOR Biden but let’s not forget the many, many reasons to vote for him over Trump.
Looking for more?
10+ good things Biden has done in climate and labor
10+ good things Biden has done in healthcare and housing
10+ good things Biden has done in the justice and courts system
A few other notes
Voting for Biden or Trump shouldn’t be the only reason you vote. You know what elections have more power over your life? LOCAL elections. If you’re not feeling jazzed about Biden… vote for someone really cool running for mayor, or your rep, or on your school board and then begrudgingly vote for Biden. 
A reminder that if someone online is trying to discourage you to vote there’s a good chance they are a paid actor to do so. Voter suppression was a well-documented tactic during the 2016 election and I’m sure the trolls are out in force again. 
Check your voter registration here, make a plan to vote, and encourage your friends to vote as well. 
All in all, yeah… there’s a lot of shitty things still happening. There’s always going to be shit but things aren’t going to change on their own. And that change starts (it certainly doesn’t end) with voting. 
Go vote in November.
6 notes · View notes
blumlawfirm · 25 days ago
Text
Understanding Employment Discrimination Lawsuits: Protecting Your Rights with Blum Law Firm
Employment discrimination lawsuit play a critical role in ensuring fairness and equality in the workplace. Discrimination based on race, gender, age, religion, disability, or other protected characteristics is not only unethical but also illegal under federal and state laws. At Blum Law Firm, we specialize in representing individuals who have experienced workplace discrimination, helping them secure the justice they deserve.
What Is an Employment Discrimination Lawsuit?
An employment discrimination lawsuit is a legal action taken by an employee or job applicant who has been subjected to unfair treatment in violation of anti-discrimination laws. These lawsuits often arise when an employer’s actions adversely affect an individual’s hiring, promotion, pay, or work environment based on discriminatory reasons.
Federal laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) provide protections against such injustices. State laws often expand on these protections, offering additional avenues for legal recourse.
Common Types of Employment Discrimination
Discrimination can take many forms, including:
Racial Discrimination: Treating employees differently based on their race or ethnicity.
Gender Discrimination: Unequal treatment or harassment based on gender or sexual orientation.
Age Discrimination: Bias against employees aged 40 or older.
Disability Discrimination: Failure to provide reasonable accommodations or unfair treatment of individuals with disabilities.
Religious Discrimination: Harassment or unequal treatment due to religious beliefs or practices.
If you believe you’ve been a victim of any of these forms of discrimination, Blum Law Firm can help you determine whether you have grounds for an employment discrimination lawsuit.
How Blum Law Firm Can Help
Navigating the complexities of an employment discrimination lawsuit can be overwhelming, especially when dealing with the emotional toll of workplace injustice. Blum Law Firm offers experienced legal guidance to help you:
Assess Your Case: We will evaluate your situation to determine whether your rights have been violated.
File a Complaint: If necessary, we will assist in filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the appropriate state agency.
Pursue Legal Action: Should your case proceed to court, we will provide aggressive representation to secure the compensation and remedies you deserve.
Why Choose Blum Law Firm?
At Blum Law Firm, we are committed to fighting for employees’ rights and holding employers accountable for discriminatory practices. With a proven track record of success, our team understands the nuances of employment discrimination lawsuit and is dedicated to achieving favorable outcomes for our clients.
If you’ve experienced workplace discrimination, don’t wait to seek justice. Contact Blum Law Firm today for a consultation. Let us help you take the first step toward restoring your dignity and protecting your rights.
0 notes
news365timesindia · 2 months ago
Text
[ad_1] There have been some misleading foreign media reports about a resolution in the United Nations General Assembly, sources in the Ministry of External Affairs said on Wednesday, adding that it is an annual resolution tabled by Pakistan in the Third Committee. The resolution was adopted without a vote. The sources also said that the resolution does not bear any mention of Jammu and Kashmir. “We have seen misleading foreign media reports about a resolution in the UNGA. This is an annual resolution tabled by Pakistan in the Third Committee. It is adopted without a vote. This resolution has no mention of Jammu and Kashmir ,” MEA Sources said. The Third Committee of the General Assembly at its seventy-ninth session, is chaired by Zephyrin Maniratanga, Permanent Representative of Burundi. As in previous sessions, an important part of the work of the Committee will focus on the examination of human rights questions, including reports of the special procedures of the Human Rights Council which was established in 2006. The Committee will hear and interact with special rapporteurs, independent experts, and chairs of treaty bodies and working groups as mandated by the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly. The Committee discusses questions relating to the advancement of women, the protection of children, indigenous issues, the treatment of refugees, the promotion of fundamental freedoms through the elimination of racism and racial discrimination, and the right to self-determination. The Committee also addresses important social development questions such as issues related to youth, family, ageing, persons with disabilities, crime prevention, criminal justice, and international drug control. The UN General Assembly (UNGA) is the main policymaking organ of the Organization. Comprising all Member States, it provides a unique forum for multilateral discussion of the full spectrum of international issues covered by the Charter of the United Nations. Each of the 193 Member States of the United Nations has an equal vote. The Assembly meets in regular sessions from September to December each year, and thereafter as required. It discusses specific issues through dedicated agenda items or sub-items, which lead to the adoption of resolutions.   [ad_2] Source link
0 notes
news365times · 2 months ago
Text
[ad_1] There have been some misleading foreign media reports about a resolution in the United Nations General Assembly, sources in the Ministry of External Affairs said on Wednesday, adding that it is an annual resolution tabled by Pakistan in the Third Committee. The resolution was adopted without a vote. The sources also said that the resolution does not bear any mention of Jammu and Kashmir. “We have seen misleading foreign media reports about a resolution in the UNGA. This is an annual resolution tabled by Pakistan in the Third Committee. It is adopted without a vote. This resolution has no mention of Jammu and Kashmir ,” MEA Sources said. The Third Committee of the General Assembly at its seventy-ninth session, is chaired by Zephyrin Maniratanga, Permanent Representative of Burundi. As in previous sessions, an important part of the work of the Committee will focus on the examination of human rights questions, including reports of the special procedures of the Human Rights Council which was established in 2006. The Committee will hear and interact with special rapporteurs, independent experts, and chairs of treaty bodies and working groups as mandated by the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly. The Committee discusses questions relating to the advancement of women, the protection of children, indigenous issues, the treatment of refugees, the promotion of fundamental freedoms through the elimination of racism and racial discrimination, and the right to self-determination. The Committee also addresses important social development questions such as issues related to youth, family, ageing, persons with disabilities, crime prevention, criminal justice, and international drug control. The UN General Assembly (UNGA) is the main policymaking organ of the Organization. Comprising all Member States, it provides a unique forum for multilateral discussion of the full spectrum of international issues covered by the Charter of the United Nations. Each of the 193 Member States of the United Nations has an equal vote. The Assembly meets in regular sessions from September to December each year, and thereafter as required. It discusses specific issues through dedicated agenda items or sub-items, which lead to the adoption of resolutions.   [ad_2] Source link
0 notes
mananjyot · 3 months ago
Text
Discrimination: A Persistent Challenge in Society
Discrimination has been a long-standing issue that continues to affect individuals and communities across the globe. Whether it’s based on race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, or socio-economic status, discrimination creates divisions, reinforces inequality, and undermines the principles of fairness and justice. Despite decades of progress in civil rights and social justice, the problem of discrimination remains pervasive, manifesting in various forms, both overt and subtle. This blog delves into the nature of discrimination, its impact, and the ongoing efforts to combat it.
Understanding Discrimination
At its core, discrimination is the unfair or unequal treatment of individuals or groups based on characteristics such as race, religion, gender, age, sexual orientation, disability, or other distinguishing traits. Discrimination often stems from biases or stereotypes, which can be rooted in cultural, historical, or personal factors. While prejudices are attitudes or beliefs, discrimination involves actions that disadvantage certain groups, whether it’s through exclusion, unequal opportunities, or outright hostility.
Discrimination can take different forms:
- Direct Discrimination: This occurs when someone is treated unfairly or less favorably because of their race, gender, or another characteristic. For example, a qualified candidate being passed over for a job simply because of their ethnicity.
- Indirect Discrimination: This happens when a policy or practice that seems neutral has a disproportionate negative effect on a particular group. For example, a workplace requiring all employees to work night shifts could indirectly disadvantage parents or caregivers, who are predominantly women.
- Institutional Discrimination: This type of discrimination is built into the policies, practices, and procedures of institutions, including schools, workplaces, and legal systems. For example, laws that disproportionately impact certain racial or ethnic groups or educational systems that do not accommodate students with disabilities.
- Microaggressions: These are subtle, often unintentional, discriminatory comments or behaviors that reflect prejudices or stereotypes. For example, a comment like “You speak English so well” can be a microaggression that subtly reinforces stereotypes about a person’s race or background.
The Impact of Discrimination
The consequences of discrimination are profound and far-reaching. On a personal level, individuals who experience discrimination often suffer from psychological distress, anxiety, and a reduced sense of self-worth. They may feel marginalized, rejected, or powerless in the face of systemic inequality. The emotional toll can lead to long-term mental health issues such as depression, stress, and trauma.
On a societal level, discrimination perpetuates inequality, limiting access to education, healthcare, housing, and employment opportunities for certain groups. This creates a cycle of poverty, lack of opportunity, and social exclusion, which can affect generations. Moreover, discrimination fuels division and tension, making it harder for communities to come together and address common challenges.
Combating discrimination requires both individual and collective action. At the individual level, fostering awareness and challenging our own biases is a crucial first step. Recognizing and confronting prejudices can help individuals become more inclusive and supportive of others, regardless of their background or identity.
On a broader scale, societal change is essential. Laws and policies need to be continually reviewed and amended to ensure that they promote equality and protect vulnerable groups. The civil rights movements of the 20th century, for example, led to important legal changes, such as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act in the United States, but there is still much work to be done.
Educational initiatives are also vital in raising awareness about the harmful effects of discrimination and promoting diversity and inclusion. Schools, workplaces, and communities should encourage open dialogue, celebrate cultural differences, and create safe spaces where discrimination is not tolerated.
Conclusion
Discrimination is a persistent societal issue that undermines the core values of equality and justice. While progress has been made in the fight against discrimination, significant challenges remain. It is only through continued efforts—both at the individual and societal levels—that we can hope to create a more inclusive, equitable world for all people, regardless of their race, gender, or background. By confronting discrimination in all its forms, we move closer to building a society where everyone can thrive without fear of bias or exclusion.
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
humanrightsupdates · 3 months ago
Text
10 Principles for Protecting Human Rights in US Elections
Tumblr media
The following principles are based on international human rights law, which offers valuable standards for protecting fundamental human rights during elections. Relevant law can be found in the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Articles 2, 6, 9, 21, 22, 25), ratified by the United States in 1992; the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Articles 1, 4, 5), ratified by the United States in 1994; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 20, 21), which is considered reflective of customary international law. Many of these provisions are reflected in US constitutional, federal, and state law.
Ensure the right to vote without discrimination or discriminatory effects
Given the long US history of discrimination against Black and brown people in their ability to exercise the right to vote, the authorities throughout the United States should ensure that voting procedures do not have discriminatory effects, particularly on Black, Native American, and other people of color, and people with disabilities, among others.
The authorities should end the disenfranchisement of people with criminal convictions, which disproportionately effects Black and brown people, as well as facilitate voting in jails and prisons. Due to existing disenfranchisement laws, voting rights should be restored for people under probation or parole supervision, or who are being barred from voting because they may owe fines and fees.
Ensure that all eligible voters are able to exercise their right to vote, by effectively communicating about voting procedures, making various voting options readily available and accessible, and adopting additional measures as needed
Election officials in the United States should counter any misinformation about polling procedures or locations promptly, consistently, accurately, and using languages and methods of communication designed to reach all eligible voters, including those with disabilities. Officials should offer a range of in-person and other voting options that would ensure that all eligible voters are able to exercise their right to vote. This includes anticipating the possibility of address changes, especially for people facing eviction and other housing transitions.
Officials should anticipate problems people may have voting if they do not have time off from work, lack dependent care, or have no access to safe, accessible, or affordable transportation.
Voters with disabilities, older people, and those unable to vote without assistance must have full and equal access to the ballot box. These measures include ensuring all polling places are fully accessible, that accommodation is provided if requested, and that all election and voting information is available in different formats. [Full article at source link]
1 note · View note
steeringlaw · 4 months ago
Text
Protecting Your Rights The Role of a Civil Rights Attorney in California
Civil rights are fundamental freedoms that every individual in the U.S. is entitled to, ensuring that all people are treated fairly under the law. These rights protect against discrimination and abuse by government entities and other organizations. In California, a civil rights attorney plays a crucial role in safeguarding these liberties. Whether you're facing discrimination in the workplace, racial profiling, or violations of your constitutional rights, a civil rights attorney can be your strongest ally in seeking justice.
Tumblr media
What Are Civil Rights?
Civil rights encompass a wide range of protections, including:
Freedom from Discrimination: Based on race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, disability, or national origin.
Freedom of Speech and Assembly: The right to express your opinions and peacefully assemble without fear of retaliation.
Right to Due Process: Protection against unlawful imprisonment or seizure of property.
Equal Protection Under the Law: Ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their background, are treated equally under state and federal law.
In California, the state’s robust civil rights laws further expand on federal protections, making it a favourable place for those seeking justice for civil rights violations.
Common Civil Rights Cases in California
Civil rights violations can occur in many settings, from the workplace to encounters with law enforcement. Some common civil rights cases include:
1. Employment Discrimination
If you have been denied a job, promotion, or equal pay based on your race, gender, or other protected characteristic, you may have grounds for a civil rights claim. California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act provides additional protection against workplace discrimination.
2. Police Misconduct
Excessive use of force, wrongful arrest, and racial profiling are just some examples of police misconduct. Civil rights attorneys help victims of police brutality seek justice by filing lawsuits against law enforcement agencies.
3. Housing Discrimination
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act also extends to housing, making it illegal for landlords or real estate agents to deny housing or charge unfair rent due to a person’s race, ethnicity, or other protected traits.
4. Disability Rights
People with disabilities are protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California law. This includes the right to access public spaces, fair treatment in education, and reasonable accommodations in the workplace.
5. Immigration Rights
As a sanctuary state, California has strong protections for immigrants. Civil rights attorneys in California often handle cases involving immigrant rights, including protection against unlawful detainment and deportation.
Why Hire a Civil Rights Attorney?
Navigating the legal system alone can be overwhelming, especially when your fundamental rights are at stake. A civil rights attorney brings valuable expertise and experience to your case. Here’s why you should consider hiring one:
1. In-Depth Legal Knowledge
Civil rights attorneys are well-versed in both state and federal laws. They can help you understand your rights and identify whether they have been violated.
2. Filing a Lawsuit
If your rights have been violated, a civil rights attorney will file a lawsuit on your behalf. This can be a complex process, requiring extensive paperwork and evidence collection, but an experienced attorney knows how to handle the details.
3. Fighting for Fair Compensation
In addition to holding the responsible parties accountable, a civil rights attorney can help you seek compensation for damages, including emotional distress, lost wages, and punitive damages.
4. Advocating for Systemic Change
Many civil rights cases go beyond individual circumstances and highlight broader social injustices. Civil rights attorneys not only advocate for their clients but also work to effect positive societal change.
How to Choose the Right Civil Rights Attorney in California
Choosing the right attorney is critical for the success of your case. Here are a few things to consider:
Experience: Look for an attorney who has a track record of handling civil rights cases similar to yours.
Reputation: Read client reviews and check the attorney’s standing with the California State Bar.
Personal Connection: Civil rights cases can be emotionally taxing, so it’s important to find an attorney you feel comfortable with and who understands the nuances of your situation.
Standing Up for Your Rights
In California, civil rights violations are unfortunately still a reality for many individuals. But with the help of a skilled civil rights attorney, you can fight back. Whether you’ve experienced discrimination, police misconduct, or another violation, you deserve justice. A dedicated attorney will stand by your side, guiding you through the legal process and helping you reclaim your rights.
Take Action Today
If you believe your civil rights have been violated, don’t wait to seek help. Reach out to a Law Office of Jerry L. Steering in California who can provide you with the legal representation and guidance you need. Your rights matter, and with the right legal advocate, you can take a stand for justice and equality.
0 notes
reneehesano · 4 months ago
Text
Promoting Equality in Housing: The Essential Role of Fair Housing Laws in Property Management
Few issues in property management are as important as ensuring compliance with fair housing laws. These laws not only uphold the rights of tenants but also create a framework for property managers to follow, reducing the risk of legal repercussions. Understanding and adhering to fair housing laws is crucial for property management professionals, as these regulations are designed to prevent discrimination and promote equality in housing opportunities.
What Are Fair Housing Laws?
Fair housing laws in the United States were established to eliminate discrimination in renting, selling, and financing housing based on protected characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, and familial status. These laws are primarily governed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and its subsequent amendments, including the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, which added protections for people with disabilities and families with children.
Fair housing laws are enforced by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and provide a legal foundation to ensure everyone has equal access to housing. Property managers must be aware of these laws and their specific protections to maintain compliance and uphold ethical standards in their profession.
The Role of Property Managers
Property managers act as intermediaries between property owners and tenants, making them critical players in ensuring fair treatment throughout the housing process. Their responsibilities include marketing properties, screening tenants, and managing lease agreements—all of which must comply with fair housing regulations.
Advertising Properties: Property managers must be cautious when advertising rental units. Discriminatory language, whether intentional or unintentional, can lead to legal consequences. Ads that state preferences for certain races, genders, or family compositions violate fair housing laws. For example, wording like "ideal for singles" or "no children allowed" can be interpreted as discriminatory. A best practice is to focus on the features of the property itself rather than the perceived characteristics of a prospective tenant.
Tenant Screening: Tenant screening is another area where property managers need to apply fair housing principles rigorously. While it's legal to evaluate potential tenants based on financial qualifications (such as income or credit history), it is illegal to reject an applicant based on their race, religion, or any other protected characteristic. Consistency in screening practices is critical—property managers should apply the same standards to all applicants, ensuring that no group is unfairly excluded.
Lease Agreements and Terms: Once tenants are selected, property managers must ensure that lease agreements do not impose discriminatory terms. For instance, imposing different terms or conditions on tenants based on their national origin or disability status is prohibited. All tenants should have access to the same lease terms, regardless of their background or personal characteristics.
Critical Protections Under Fair Housing Laws
Protection Against Racial Discrimination: The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate against individuals based on race or color. This means property managers cannot refuse to rent or sell properties to someone based on their race or impose different terms or conditions on a tenant of a certain race. Racial discrimination in housing has a long and fraught history in the United States, and the law aims to address past injustices while ensuring equity moving forward.
Protection for People with Disabilities: The 1988 amendments to the Fair Housing Act added critical protections for people with disabilities. Property managers are required to make reasonable accommodations for tenants with disabilities. This could include allowing service animals in buildings that otherwise have a no-pets policy or modifying a rental unit to include ramps for wheelchair access. Failure to make these accommodations can result in severe penalties under the law.
Family and Marital Status: Families with children are another group protected under fair housing laws. Property managers cannot refuse to rent to families with children or impose restrictions that would disproportionately impact them, such as limiting families to certain areas of the property or refusing to rent certain types of units to them. The law also protects pregnant women and individuals in the process of securing legal custody of a child under the age of 18.
Religious Protections: Religious discrimination in housing is also prohibited. Property managers cannot refuse to rent to someone based on their religion, nor can they impose different rules or fees based on religious beliefs. Advertising rental properties as being more suitable for individuals of a particular faith or giving preferential treatment to individuals of the same religion as the property manager or owner would be considered illegal under fair housing laws.
Common Challenges in Fair Housing Compliance
Despite the legal framework in place, challenges to fair housing compliance still exist. Property managers must navigate a fine line between ensuring their property is secure and functional while also making reasonable accommodations. For example, concerns around safety and liability might arise when modifying a unit for a tenant with disabilities. Still, such concerns must not outweigh the property manager's responsibility to comply with the law.
Another common challenge is staying informed about the ever-evolving landscape of fair housing regulations. Local, state, and federal laws can vary and change over time, requiring property managers to stay updated. Regular training on fair housing laws can help property managers and their staff remain compliant and avoid costly lawsuits.
The Benefits of Fair Housing Compliance
Complying with fair housing laws is not just about avoiding lawsuits—it's about fostering a reputation for fairness and inclusivity. When property managers follow these laws, they create environments where tenants feel respected and valued. This can lead to higher tenant retention, positive word-of-mouth, and, ultimately, a more successful property management business.
Moreover, embracing fair housing principles can help reduce bias in the rental market. By treating all tenants equally, property managers can contribute to a more inclusive society where housing opportunities are available to everyone, regardless of their background.
Upholding Fairness in Property Management
Fair housing laws are a cornerstone of property management in the United States, ensuring that discrimination has no place in the housing market. Compliance with these laws is essential for property managers—not only to avoid legal repercussions but also to build trust with tenants and contribute to the greater good of society. By staying informed, applying the laws consistently, and fostering an environment of inclusion, property managers can play a crucial role in promoting equality in housing.
0 notes
karnsandkarns12 · 7 months ago
Text
Top Civil Rights Attorneys: Best Lawyers Fighting for Justice and Equality
Tumblr media
In the quest for justice and equality, Civil Rights Attorneys play an indispensable role. These top lawyers dedicate their careers to advocating for individuals and communities who face discrimination and injustice. Their work ensures that the principles of equality and fairness are upheld in society, making them essential figures in the legal landscape. Here, we explore the importance of civil rights attorneys, highlight some of the best in the field, and discuss their significant contributions to social justice.
The Role of Civil Rights Attorneys
Civil Rights Attorneys specialize in cases involving the violation of individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and other laws. These can include issues such as:
Racial discrimination
Gender inequality
LGBTQ+ rights
Disability rights
Voting rights
Police misconduct
Employment discrimination
Their work often involves representing clients in court, negotiating settlements, and working on legislation that promotes equality and protects civil liberties. By taking on challenging cases, these attorneys ensure that the voices of marginalized and oppressed communities are heard and that justice is served.
Top Civil Rights Attorneys Making a Difference
Bryan Stevenson As the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), Bryan Stevenson has dedicated his career to fighting racial injustice and mass incarceration. His work in challenging wrongful convictions and advocating for the poor and marginalized has made him a leading figure in civil rights law.
Sherrilyn Ifill As the President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Sherrilyn Ifill has been at the forefront of many significant civil rights cases. Her advocacy for voting rights and racial equality has been instrumental in shaping fairer laws and policies.
Ben Crump Known for his work on high-profile police brutality cases, Ben Crump has become a prominent voice in the fight against racial injustice. His representation of families in cases such as those of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor highlights his commitment to seeking justice for victims of systemic discrimination.
Vanita Gupta As the former head of the Civil Rights Division at the U.S. Department of Justice, Vanita Gupta has been a strong advocate for criminal justice reform and civil rights protections. Her efforts have focused on addressing police misconduct, hate crimes, and discrimination.
The Impact of Civil Rights Attorneys
The work of civil rights attorneys extends beyond individual cases; it influences broader societal change. By challenging unjust laws and practices, they help to set legal precedents that benefit future generations. Their advocacy raises public awareness about important issues and drives legislative reforms that promote equality and protect civil rights.
Civil rights attorneys also play a crucial role in empowering communities. Through education and legal support, they enable individuals to understand and assert their rights. This empowerment is essential for creating a more just and equitable society.
Conclusion
The Best Civil Rights Attorneys are not only skilled legal professionals but also passionate advocates for justice and equality. Their dedication to fighting discrimination and protecting civil liberties ensures that the principles of fairness and equality remain at the core of our legal system. As society continues to grapple with issues of injustice and inequality, the work of these top lawyers remains as vital as ever. By standing up for the rights of the marginalized and oppressed, civil rights attorneys help to build a more just and equitable world for all.
0 notes
best-local-services · 8 months ago
Text
The Vital Role of a Civil Rights Lawyer in Upholding Justice
Civil rights lawyers play a crucial role in ensuring that the freedoms and rights of individuals are protected. Their work spans various critical areas, from fighting discrimination to defending freedom of speech. In this blog, we'll delve into the essential functions of civil rights lawyers, the significance of their work, and how they contribute to a more just society.
Understanding Civil Rights
Civil rights refer to the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed to all individuals under the law. These rights include freedom of speech, the right to privacy, the right to vote, freedom from discrimination, and the right to a fair trial. Civil rights are enshrined in the Constitution, specifically within the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments, as well as various federal and state laws.
The Role of a Civil Rights Lawyer
Civil rights lawyers specialize in cases involving the violation of these fundamental rights. Their responsibilities include:
Legal Representation: They represent clients in court who have experienced violations of their civil rights. This can involve cases of discrimination based on race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, or religion.
Advocacy: Beyond the courtroom, civil rights lawyers advocate for policy changes and reforms to promote equal rights and justice.
Education: They educate the public about their rights and how to protect them. This can involve community outreach, seminars, and public speaking engagements.
Litigation: Civil rights lawyers file lawsuits on behalf of individuals or groups who have suffered from civil rights abuses. These cases can set significant legal precedents and lead to broader social changes.
Tumblr media
Key Areas of Focus
Civil rights lawyers handle a wide range of issues. Some of the key areas include:
Discrimination
Discrimination cases are among the most common in civil rights law. Lawyers fight against unfair treatment in employment, housing, education, and public accommodations. They work to ensure that everyone, regardless of their background, has equal access to opportunities and resources.
Police Misconduct
Instances of police misconduct and brutality have become a significant focus for civil rights lawyers. They represent victims of excessive force, unlawful arrests, and other forms of police misconduct, seeking justice and accountability.
Voting Rights
Voting rights are fundamental to a democratic society. Civil rights lawyers work to protect these rights, ensuring that all citizens can participate in the electoral process without facing discrimination or undue barriers.
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy. Civil rights lawyers defend individuals and organizations facing censorship or other restrictions on their right to free expression.
The Impact of Civil Rights Lawyers
The work of civil rights lawyers has led to significant societal changes. Landmark cases like Brown v. Board of Education, which ended racial segregation in public schools, and Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, demonstrate the profound impact of their work.
Promoting Equality
By challenging discriminatory practices and policies, civil rights lawyers promote greater equality in society. Their efforts help to break down systemic barriers that prevent marginalized groups from achieving their full potential.
Ensuring Accountability
Civil rights lawyers hold powerful entities, including government agencies and corporations, accountable for their actions. This accountability is crucial for maintaining public trust and upholding the rule of law.
Advancing Legal Precedents
Through their cases, civil rights lawyers contribute to the development of legal precedents that shape future interpretations of the law. These precedents can have far-reaching implications for protecting civil rights.
Challenges Faced by Civil Rights Lawyers
Despite their vital work, civil rights lawyers face numerous challenges. These can include:
Resource Limitations: Many civil rights organizations operate with limited resources, making it difficult to take on all deserving cases.
Political and Social Opposition: Efforts to advance civil rights can face significant opposition from powerful interests.
Complex Legal Landscape: Civil rights law is complex and constantly evolving, requiring lawyers to stay informed about new developments and precedents.
Civil rights lawyers are indispensable champions of justice and equality. Their tireless work ensures that the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution are protected for all individuals. By fighting against discrimination, advocating for policy changes, and educating the public, civil rights lawyers play a pivotal role in shaping a more just and equitable society.
0 notes
digitaldetoxworld · 8 months ago
Text
The Interwoven Threads How Social Justice Issues Intersect
Social justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses fairness, Environmental justice equity, and equality in all aspects of society, including economic, political, and social spheres.  At its core, social justice seeks to address systemic injustices and disparities, advocating for the rights and well-being of marginalized individuals and communities. It recognizes that certain groups face barriers and discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and ability, and aims to dismantle these barriers to create a more inclusive and equitable world for all.
Tumblr media
One of the fundamental principles of social justice is the recognition of privilege and the acknowledgment of the ways in which privilege can perpetuate inequality. Privilege refers to the unearned advantages that certain groups possess as a result of their social identity, such as being white, male, heterosexual, or wealthy. These privileges can manifest in various ways, from access to opportunities and resources to societal perceptions and treatment.
For example, white privilege is the societal advantage that white individuals experience as a result of their race. It allows them to navigate the world with greater ease and less scrutiny compared to people of color. White privilege can manifest in everyday situations, such as interactions with law enforcement, access to quality education and healthcare, and representation in the media and other institutions. Recognizing and addressing white privilege is essential for promoting racial equity and justice.
Similarly, male privilege refers to the societal advantages that men have over women simply because of their gender. This can include higher wages, greater representation in leadership positions, and fewer barriers to advancement in various fields. Male privilege perpetuates gender inequality and contributes to the marginalization of women in society. By challenging and dismantling male privilege, we can work towards achieving gender equality and empowering women to fully participate in all aspects of society.
It is also encompasses the fight against discrimination and oppression based on factors such as sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability. LGBTQ+ individuals often face discrimination and violence because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. This can manifest in many forms, including hate crimes, workplace discrimination, and lack of legal protections. Advocating for LGBTQ+ rights and creating inclusive spaces are essential steps towards achieving social justice for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Likewise, people with disabilities often face barriers to full participation in society, including lack of accessibility, discrimination, and stigma. Social justice requires us to challenge ableism and work towards creating a more inclusive society where people with disabilities have equal opportunities to thrive and contribute.
In addition to addressing individual forms of oppression, and also involves examining and challenging systemic injustices embedded within institutions and structures. This includes disparities in education, healthcare, criminal justice, and economic opportunity. For example, communities of color often face disproportionately high rates of poverty, unemployment, and incarceration due to systemic racism and discrimination. It is  requires us to confront these systemic issues and work towards creating a more equitable society where everyone has the opportunity to succeed.
Education plays a crucial role in promoting social justice by raising awareness, challenging biases, and empowering individuals to take action. By teaching about privilege, oppression, and systemic injustice, we can equip people with the knowledge and tools they need to advocate for change and work towards a more just and equitable world.
Furthermore, allyship is an essential component of social justice, as it involves using one's privilege and resources to support and amplify the voices of marginalized individuals and communities. Allies play a crucial role in challenging oppressive systems and advocating for change, whether through activism, education, or direct support.
Tumblr media
Ultimately, achieving social justice requires ongoing commitment and collective action from individuals, communities, and institutions. Disability justice it involves challenging systems of power and privilege, advocating for the rights of marginalized groups, and working towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society for all. By centering the voices and experiences of those most impacted by injustice, we can work together to build a better world for future generations.
0 notes