#multilateralism
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Chinese Senior Diplomat Calls To Resist Cold War Mentality At BRICS Security Meetings
— Global Times Staff Reporters | July 25, 2023
Photo: BRICS. VCG
Cyber security as well as other threats in traditional and non-traditional security fields have taken the spotlight at the ongoing meetings of BRICS countries in Johannesburg, South Africa, as analysts said that amid growing global uncertainties, more developing countries are seeking to improve solidarity to jointly tackle challenges to their development under the auspices of the BRICS mechanism.
While attending the 13th Meeting of BRICS National Security Advisers and High Representatives on National Security in Johannesburg, South Africa on Tuesday, senior Chinese diplomat Wang Yi said that after more than 10 years of development, the BRICS has become an important platform for emerging market countries and developing countries to unite and self-development.
Under the new situation, we must grasp the future development direction of the BRICS countries, further strengthen political mutual trust and strategic coordination, continue to provide international public goods that meet the requirements of the times, and strive to translate the BRICS spirit of openness, inclusiveness, and win-win cooperation into practical actions, and polish the "golden brand" of BRICS cooperation, Wang said.
To deal with the current global security challenges and solve the security dilemma, Wang also called for countries to resist unilateralism, hegemony and oppose "decoupling" and "double standards" and oppose Cold War mentality and zero-sum game.
Analysts said that the ongoing meetings for security advisors and senior diplomats from BRICS countries and "Friends of BRICS" underscored the security concerns of developing countries and new emerging economies over the destructive activities, "color revolutions" and cyber attacks plotted by some countries who have posed great threats to the stable development of developing countries and global peace.
Aside from expressing their concerns over traditional and non-traditional security fields, BRICS countries and developing countries are seeking to improve solidarity to jointly tackle development challenges under the BRICS mechanism, which will also be part of the build-up to the 15th BRICS Summit in South Africa to be held from August 22 to 24, they noted.
On Monday, a meeting, which was held under the theme of "Cyber security is increasingly becoming a challenge for developing countries," is also being attended by Minister in the Presidency of South Africa Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, Chief Adviser of the Presidency of Brazil Celso Luiz Nunes Amorim, Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval of India and representatives of Belarus, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Burundi, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, Cuba and other countries.
Security Concerns Under Spotlight
During the Tuesday meeting, Wang, member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and also director of the Office of the CPC Central Commission for Foreign Affairs, said that the "Global South" is a collection of emerging market countries and developing countries, reflecting our collective rise on the international stage. Countries in the "Global South" face the important mission of resisting the external intervention and maintaining political security and regime security.
Wang Yi said that unity is strength, action is direction, and openness is motivation. China is willing to work with BRICS partners to support each other's efforts to maintain national security and stability, and to carry out more practical cooperation in dealing with international security challenges, so that the world can hear more BRICS voices and witness a greater role of the BRICS.
Senior officials on security from BRICS countries also exchanged in-depth views on issues such as current security challenges, anti-terrorism and cyber security, food and water security, and energy security, and reached broad consensus, according to a release from Chinese Foreign Ministry.
The issue of cyber security has been discussed at length at the ongoing BRICS meeting as some Western countries have intensified using the internet to conduct destructive activities in other countries, including inciting domestic riots, fooling the public or organizing cyber attacks on governmental departments, which have posed threats to developing countries' stability and development, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and TV commentator, told the Global Times on Tuesday.
The meeting on security, together with other meetings in various fields, will lay the groundwork for the leaders' summit in August, as the BRICS mechanism is a cooperative mechanism beyond economic and security fields, and whether it is regarding traditional or non-traditional fields, it would safeguard development and cooperation in other areas, Song said.
This year's BRICS summit will focus on improving cooperation between BRICS members and African countries in technology, economy and other fields, and security would also be the basis for cooperation, said Song.
South Africa has invited the heads of state of all African countries to the summit, which is themed as "BRICS and Africa: Partnership for Mutually Accelerated Growth, Sustainable Development, and Inclusive Multilateralism." The summit is anticipated to discuss how BRICS countries can better work with African countries, media reported.
Security is the core concern for the financial cooperation of BRICS countries and other developing countries. This is also why BRICS countries are studying the potential use of alternative currencies to the US dollar, analysts said.
For the past months, many media, especially those from the West and the US, have reported that BRICS countries are seeking to shift from the dollar in mutual trade to avoid becoming "victim" to sanctions. For example, in April, Bloomberg reported that Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called on BRICS countries to come up with an alternative to the dollar in foreign trade.
South Africa, the BRICS chair, has put the stability of the global financial system as a priority for the BRICS meetings, as BRICS countries and developing countries have been put in an unfavorable position that would be affected by global financial hegemony, Wang Lei, director of the Center for BRICS Cooperation Studies at Beijing Normal University, told the Global Times.
However, de-dollarization is not the core mission of BRICS countries and what they want is to make the global financial system fairer and more inclusive, and to better reflect the major changes that have happened in the global governing system, Wang Lei said.
Against the backdrop of the continuous Russia-Ukraine conflict and drastic global changes unseen in a century, developing countries are seeking to inject more stable and secure impetus to the world and to promote the international governing system to be more inclusive and better reflect their interests. However, the US and some Western media have smeared their efforts, analysts said.
What BRICS countries are working toward is not to compete with the US for its hegemony, but to build a multipolar world in which each country's concerns on security, economy and developments can be respected by others - this may also be the reason for the US and West's increasing worries of the growing influence and attractiveness of BRICS, Song said.
#BRICS#South Africa 🇿🇦#Cold War Mentality#Decoupling#Double Standards#Cyber Security#Global South#China 🇨🇳#Mutually Accelerated Growth#Sustainable Development#Multilateralism#Bloomberg#Brazil 🇧🇷#President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva#Global Times#Alternative Currencies#US Dollar 🇺🇸
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
MULTILATERALISM
Multilateralism has been fundamental in maintaining peace and prosperity since the end of World War II. International organisations like the United Nations have played a central role in preventing conflicts and promoting stability.
Financial Stability: Multilateral cooperation has been critical in addressing global financial crises and promoting international financial stability. Institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) work to stabilize the global economy through multilateral efforts.
The article focuses on Multilateralism, where several countries are involved in pinpointing similar problems and making cooperative steps to eradicate these problems. It contains the involvement of at least 3 countries or more than that. Our respected faculty have observed and approved this article.
Access all the news and current affairs updates through the Plutus IAS website’s Current Affairs section. Undoubtedly Plutus IAS is giving the best IAS coaching in Delhi NCR and supporting candidates to attain high scores in the UPSC exam.
#ias coaching in delhi#upscaspirants#upsccoaching#civil services examination#upsc exam preparation#best ias coaching in delhi#education#ias#iascoaching#plutus ias#multilateralism#upsccurrentaffairs#currentaffairs#upscexam#upsc#upsc aspirants#ias preparation#ias institute in delhi#ias academy
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
RULES BASED INTERNATIONAL ORDER - IMPLICATIONS & ALTERNATIVES
https://rumble.com/v5xu0jn-rules-based-international-order-implications-and-alternatives.html
This video explores the nebulous "Rules-Based International Order," critiquing its lack of formal legal basis and its alignment with Western interests. The selective application of these rules, often favoring Western agendas, has led to debates about their legitimacy. The BRICS summit in Kazan, expanding to include new members like Egypt and Iran, showcased a shift towards a more sovereign and multilateral global approach, contrasting with the perceived Western imperialism. This event highlights criticisms of the order's selective enforcement, promotion of Western ideals, and cultural superiority, increasingly questioned in global forums. Emerging powers advocate for a world where international law is universally applied, promoting economic cooperation and cultural diversity without Western dominance.
#RulesBasedOrder#InternationalLaw#BRICS#GlobalPolitics#WesternImperialism#SelectiveEnforcement#Multilateralism#GlobalCooperation#CulturalDiversity#Geopolitics#Sovereignty#EconomicCooperation#Legitimacy#GlobalSouth#WesternDominance
0 notes
Text
(Panel 2) The challenges of francophonie in peacekeeping – Observatory Boutros-Ghali for peacekeeping.
This French-language seminar will look into the state of play of the contribution of French-speaking troop- and police-contributing countries to peace operations, and discuss future prospects for their involvement in this multilateral tool.
(Panel 2) The challenges of francophonie in peacekeeping – Observatory Boutros-Ghali for peacekeeping
#peacekeeping#peacekeepers#military police#uniformed personnel#military personnel#peace operations#future prospects#panel discussion#unhq#Multilateralism
0 notes
Text
youtube
#youtube#militarytraining#economic cooperation#APEC 2023#Lima Peru#Antony Blinken#U.S. Secretary of State#CEO Summit#foreign policy#leadership#international relations#APEC Summit#diplomacy#global economy#trade#global trade#international summit#international cooperation#Peru events#US Secretary of State#summit highlights#global leadership#economic development#political commentary#Multilateralism#Economic Cooperation#Secretary of State#Economic Summit#US Foreign Policy
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Economic Impact of a Kamala Harris Presidency: U.S. and Global Perspectives
The prediction that Kamala Harris could win the U.S. elections has sparked discussions across various fields, including politics, economics, and international relations. While predictions, particularly those based on astrology, are not grounded in empirical evidence, it is an interesting exercise to explore the potential impacts that a Kamala Harris presidency could have on both the U.S. economy…
#2024 U.S. Elections#Climate Change#Corporate Tax#Environmental Policy#Global Financial Markets#Global Trade#Green Economy#Healthcare Reform#Income Inequality#Infrastructure Investment#International Relations#Job Creation#Kamala Harris#Multilateralism#National Debt#Renewable Energy#Social Welfare#Tax Policy#U.S. Economy#U.S.-China Relations#World Economy
0 notes
Text
Women's Leadership in Multilateral Diplomacy.
Watch the Commemorative Event to mark the International Day of Women in Diplomacy 2024!
Theme: Women's Leadership in Multilateral Diplomacy.
#Multilateral Diplomacy#Women's leadership#united nations trusteeship council#unhq#diplomacy#diplomatic relations#women's role#multilateralism
0 notes
Text
Analysis of: "The 2023/24 Human Development Report - Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world" (UNDP)
PDF-Download: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2023-24reporten.pdf
Summary of the key points discussed:
The document provides a balanced assessment of persistent global ties and ongoing challenges of global interdependence.
It argues economic, digital, cultural, climate and other ties ensure interdependence remains a defining feature despite some slowed integration.
Concentrated risks, socio-political polarization, slowed cooperation and planetary pressures pose challenges.
Better cooperation is needed to manage interdependence through global public goods, reframing issues, and renovating institutions.
Climate change is framed as an opportunity for cooperation through its technological and developmental implications.
Geopolitical tensions complicate cooperation required to collectively manage interconnected challenges.
Beyond GDP metrics and planetary perspectives are needed given Anthropocene dynamics.
The document demonstrates principled and evidence-based reasoning while accounting for multiple perspectives.
Ideas centered on pragmatic solutions, nuance, long-term thinking and global collaboration.
Widespread acceptance could foster an adaptive, holistic, cooperative and responsible global culture.
Genre of the document
Based on the content and style of writing, this document appears to be an analytical piece intended to inform and analyze a topic, rather than to simply report facts or tell a story. Key indicators that point to this genre include:
The use of an objective, somewhat detached tone without much emotive language.
Presenting arguments and reasoning to support key points, rather than just narrating events.
Referencing other research and literature to support the analysis and arguments being made.
Explaining concepts and framing issues for consideration, rather than just listing details.
Drawing conclusions and implications from the analysis presented.
Discussing macro-level trends and forces rather than just recounting specific events.
Therefore, I would classify the genre of this document as analytical. The purpose seems to be to examine and explain the dynamics of global interdependence in a reasoned, evidence-based manner, rather than just to report facts or tell a story.
Summary of the key points
Global interdependence persists despite a slowdown in economic integration. Hyperconnectivity through flows of information, people, ideas, and culture linking vast geographic distances is a defining feature of our time.
Planetary changes of the Anthropocene - pandemics, climate change, biodiversity loss - transcend borders, as do advances in digital technologies which shift economic structures.
While policy choices shape certain flows, the Anthropocene reality is that impacts like climate change cannot be managed through controlling at-border flows. We must embrace managing interdependence.
Digitalization links vast distances, enabling real-time collaboration and information sharing among billions. Digital services exports account for over half of commercial services trade.
The persistence of global ties comes despite concerns over concentrated global value chains increasing vulnerabilities to disruptions. Risks arose from liberalizing without effective safeguards.
If interdependence is inevitable, choices center on harnessing it or retreating behind borders. Neither fully avoids reshaped interdependence like climate change. managing interdependence better is key.
Anthropocene epoch
According to the document, the Anthropocene is:
A proposed new geological epoch characterized by unprecedented human impact on Earth systems.
Humans have become geological-scale drivers of planetary changes through activities like greenhouse gas emissions, land use change, etc. that alter the climate, biosphere, etc. at a planetary scale.
This ushers a new set of planetary challenges in addition to economic globalization, including pandemics, climate change, biodiversity loss that transcend borders and cannot be contained or directly managed by curbing flows at borders.
Under the Anthropocene the connections between social, economic and ecological spheres have been made inseparable, requiring a joint framing of issues.
Technological development and choices, like digital technologies and efforts to decarbonize, are profoundly reshaping interdependence in multiple ways that will persist far into the future.
So the Anthropocene provides a planetary lens to understand deeply interlinked human-nature interdependence that continues to evolve through human activities on a shared planet, demanding new approaches to global cooperation.
Persistent global ties
According to the document, despite a slowdown in the pace of economic integration, several key types of global ties remain at historically unprecedented levels of interdependence, making it an ongoing characteristic of the current era:
Economic interdependence: While trade in goods as a share of GDP appears to have plateaued, total trade (goods and services) remains at very high absolute levels. Financial interdependence also remains historically high, though is a smaller share of GDP than pre-2008 levels.
Cross-border flows of people, finance, information: Migration levels continue setting records, remittances approach the scale of foreign direct investment, and digital connectivity enabled huge growth in cross-border data flows despite plateaus in goods trade.
Planetary interdependence: Challenges like climate change and future pandemics cannot be circumscribed or escaped through restricting flows given their planetary scale impacts that transcend borders.
Technological drivers: Digitalization, clean energy shifts, continuing innovation ensure new forms of interdependence persist and intensify existing connections between economies.
Conceptual infrastructure: Ideas, knowledge, cultural influences spread globally almost instantaneously through digital communication networks.
In summary, despite slowed economic integration, multiple established and emergent drivers still characterize the world as one of unprecedented sustained overall interdependence well into the future.
Destabilizing dynamics
The document identifies several destabilizing dynamics that are reshaping global interdependence in problematic ways:
Concentration in global value chains and markets increases vulnerabilities, as disruptions can propagate through integrated systems. This was highlighted by COVID-19 supply chain disruptions.
Policy preferences regarding globalization have become more polarized in many countries, fueling the discontent that feeds populism and challenges international cooperation.
Societal polarization is on the rise, complicating collective action on shared challenges like climate change that transcend borders.
Geopolitical tensions among major powers are escalating for the first time since WWII, complicating multilateral cooperation.
Loss of control over economic flows that underpin populist discontent, as seen in heightened profit shifting to tax havens by multinationals.
Planetary changes like climate change intensify inequalities in human development impacts between societies.
Economic shifts tied to digitization may disrupt labor markets and development prospects without adequate policies.
Pandemics and conflicts spill over borders, surging amid gridlock in collectively managing interdependence.
In summary, changes in the scale and speed of interdependence alongside societal polarization and geopolitical tensions are destabilizing in multiple ways that complexity collective action.
Societal polarization
Here are the key points the document makes about the effects of societal polarization:
Rising populism and polarization of views on globalization in many countries complicates the ability to take collective action on issues requiring international cooperation.
When domestic public opinions are at opposite ends of the spectrum on global challenges, it fuels discontent and makes consensus difficult within and between nations.
This polarization of policy preferences regarding economic integration and the costs/benefits of interdependence clouds opportunities for partnership.
Issues like climate change that require a global response become more politically contentious as tensions rise within societies.
Divided publics are harder to unite behind joint efforts and make collective sacrifices or changes in behavior needed to tackle planetary-scale problems.
Polarization challenges the framing of shared global issues as opportunities rather than just obligations or risks.
So in essence, growing societal divisions hamper multilateral progress by fueling the "globalization of discontent" and limiting political will for internationally coordinated solutions.
Geopolitical tensions among major powers
According to the document, geopolitical tensions among major powers have been rising for the first time since the end of the Cold War:
Large-scale conflicts involving major powers such as the US, China, Russia are escalating, reversing the decline in conflicts between states witnessed after the Cold War ended.
The involvement of major powers in the wars in Ukraine, Yemen, Syria, etc. indicates how geopolitical interdependence is playing out through aligned military and funding support for combatants.
While countries depend on each other to break out of conflicts, it is not evident that external involvement helps achieve solutions more quickly or ends wars.
The document notes major powers' competing interests make cooperation limited on specific policy issues, evidenced in failures at international institutions where certain proposals have been tabled over the years to reform governance arrangements.
Growing strategic competition/distrust between the US, China and Russia complicates addressing shared global challenges through international cooperation including for providing global public goods.
So in summary, rising tensions among major powers are seen as complicating international collective action needed to manage global interdependence.
Managing interdependence
The document argues that fully retreating from or unwinding interdependence is not really an option, given the drivers that will persist well into the future, like:
The planetary challenges of the Anthropocene (climate change, pandemics, biodiversity loss) which transcend borders and require global cooperation.
Digital technologies and their intensifying global flows of data/information, reconfiguring economies.
Instead, the document emphasizes the need to embrace and manage interdependence better through:
Addressing drivers of the "globalization of discontent" like unequal distribution of costs/benefits.
Framing shared global challenges like climate change as opportunities for cooperation.
Providing global public goods to cooperatively manage interdependence in an equitable way.
Considering planetary public goods to navigate dangerous planetary changes.
Harnessing interdependence through digital technologies in ways benefiting all.
Renovating multilateral institutions and governance to better address 21st century challenges.
The focus is on managing interdependence positively through globally coordinated approaches and institutions, rather than attempting to withdraw from or contain interdependence through border controls.
Digitalization
The document does not provide extensive details on the effects of digitalization, but it does mention a few key points:
Digital technologies are reshaping global interdependence and economic flows in deep and ongoing ways that will persist far into the future.
They are intensifying existing cross-border flows of data, connectivity, and information in unprecedented ways that reconfigure economies.
If harnessed appropriately with policies supporting societies, digitalization has potential to help decarbonize economies and shift interdependence toward more sustainable patterns.
However, digitization may also disrupt labor markets and development prospects without adequate policies to manage the changes and ensure widespread benefits.
New forms of global connection and economic interaction enabled by digital technologies will persist and further embed global interdependence, requiring governance of issues like data and AI.
So in summary, while not the core focus, the document recognizes digitalization as a defining driver that is both intensifying interdependence but also could help transition relationships in a positive direction if harnessed cooperatively through globally coordinated efforts.
Global public goods
According to the document, global public goods are characterized as:
Anything - an object, action, inaction, idea - that when provided, everyone around the world can enjoy.
Non-exclusive, in that one person's use does not reduce availability to others.
Non-rival, meaning use by one does not reduce use by others.
Hard to exclude people from access and enjoyment.
Diverse - include both tangible outputs as well as intangibles like knowledge.
Can be provided fully with contributions from one country (best-shot) or cumulatively from multiple countries (summation).
Weakest-link type depends on the contribution of the least able country.
Examples discussed include climate change mitigation, pandemic control, open knowledge/ideas.
Providing them goes beyond making something available to devising ways for universal access and enjoyment.
Can be determined once provided, or purposefully established and made available by countries through coordination.
The document frames global public goods as pertaining to challenges of shared interest where approaches are needed to manage cross-border spillovers and interdependence.
Climate change as opportunity for cooperation
The document frames climate change as both a profound global challenge stemming from mismanaged interdependence, but also as an opportunity for cooperation. Some key points made:
Positive framing: Climate change mitigation reframed from an obligation to a technological opportunity, through clean energy innovation. This could help crowd in support.
Accelerating clean technologies shifts interdependence in a potentially positive direction, toward more digital, less emissions-intensive economies.
Very high and high HDI countries have made improvements to their HDI without increasing planetary pressures, showing decoupling is possible.
Framing climate action as providing best-shot global public goods like transformative clean technologies could mobilize cooperative ambition.
Emphasizing mutual benefits of climate solutions could help build support beyond those directly impacted.
Renewable energy "moonshots" have potential to inspire global cooperation the way Apollo program inspired collective will in 1960s.
The document suggests a positive vision highlighting shared interests and mutual benefits has potential to build momentum and catalyze collective action to scale, where a focus only on obligations fails. However, it acknowledges ongoing political challenges and uncertainties remain. Overall the assessment is that climate change can be repositioned from primarily an obligation to additionally an area of cooperative opportunity.
Renovating the multilateral institutions and governance
The document argues that renovating multilateral institutions and global governance is important to better manage evolving global interdependence in the 21st century. Some key points:
Current institutions reflect post-WWII power dynamics and global context, but the world has changed substantially.
Governance arrangements remain unrepresentative and face legitimacy challenges restricting cooperation.
Achieving development requires institutions aligned with expanding what we value in human development (beyond GDP/outcomes to include agency/freedoms).
Institutions have tools to foster cooperation (frame issues, aggregate actions, distribute burdens/benefits fairly).
Weak capacity to deliver planetary public goods for navigating the Anthropocene is a governance gap.
Financial architecture requires complement to traditional aid, supporting global public goods provision.
Digital technologies require discussion of appropriate governance for AI, data flows and new challenges.
Focus is shifting to "Beyond GDP" metrics and planetary/intergenerational thinking versus short-term growth.
The document argues reshaping multilateral cooperation based on an analysis of how interdependence is evolving could better promote managing global challenges through collective action.
"Beyond GDP" metrics and planetary/intergenerational thinking
According to the document:
"Beyond GDP" metrics refer to expanding what is valued in development beyond just economic growth indicators like GDP, to also include well-being achievements and other aspects like agency and freedoms.
This recognizes limitations of GDP/outcomes metrics alone in fully describing development progress in the 21st century context.
Planetary/intergenerational thinking acknowledges the interdependence between human societies and the planet, requiring consideration of longer term impacts on future generations from current actions.
It represents a shift from short-term growth priorities to accounting for effects on the biosphere that sustains all life and on what will be inherited by coming generations.
The document argues expanding metrics and perspectives in this way is important given:
Intensifying planetary challenges from human impacts like climate change in the Anthropocene epoch.
Recognition that development should increase capabilities, beyond production to well-being aspects like agency.
Emerging limitations of existing metrics to address new inequalities and uncertainties.
This framing helps reorient institutions to better reflect what humans truly value in development and guides transitioning to sustainability given global interdependence.
Key stakeholders affected
Policymakers and governments: The document evaluates how governments can better manage interdependence through global cooperation and public goods. It aims to inform policy approaches.
Researchers and analysts: The analysis advances understanding of evolving global interdependence and options to manage associated challenges.
Citizens globally: All people are affected by how global interdependence is shaped, through its impacts on things like conflicts, forced migration, climate change and pandemics.
Businesses: Firms are profoundly affected by policies governing global economic integration, flows of information, and sustainability transitions.
Evaluation:
The document takes a global perspective, seeking to understand interdependence comprehensively rather than privileging some stakeholders.
It identifies both opportunities and risks of interdependence, considering implications for well-being, agency and human security across groups.
By framing shared challenges rather than differences, it aims to inform cooperation among stakeholders with diverse interests and preferences.
However, it does not engage stakeholders directly, making the arguments and analysis but not consulting those affected.
On balance, while taking a balanced view, the analytical nature of the document means it informs but does not directly engage the range of stakeholders affected by choices on managing interdependence.
Evaluation of the situation
The document provides a generally positive evaluation of the current situation of global interdependence, while also highlighting some ongoing challenges:
Positive aspects:
Global interconnectedness through information, digital, economic and movement links remains high overall, despite slower trade/financial integration. This reflects the deep roots and persistence of global ties.
Economic interdependence remains at historically unprecedented levels, stabilizing after hyperglobalization, indicating integration is not unraveling.
Digital connectivity in particular continues intense growth, shrinking distances between places through real-time online collaboration and communication.
Challenging aspects:
Concentration in global supply chains increases vulnerabilities to disruptions from any one actor/region.
Anti-elite populism exploits discontent with uneven distribution of globalization gains.
Slowed trade and potential trade barriers may curb economic opportunities in some places.
Planetary changes like climate change intensify cross-border interdependencies and risks through pandemics, displacement and market/financial volatility.
Overall, while the deep roots and persistence of global ties are acknowledged, the document points to challenges from concentrated global risks and slow policy adaptation to emerging drivers of interdependence like the Anthropocene. On balance it depicts the situation as a complex mix of persistent global ties alongside destabilizing dynamics warranting better cooperation to manage.
Type of culture that would result from widespread adoption of the ideas
Globally cooperative/interdependent: By emphasizing shared global challenges and opportunities for partnership, it would foster a culture of cooperation between nations accustomed to seeing issues through an interdependent lens.
Forward-thinking and adaptive: Focusing on long-term sustainability, emerging trends and modernizing institutions promotes flexibility, innovation and preparedness for future changes.
Holistically prosperous: Broader view of development prioritizing well-being, freedoms and responsibility to future generations encourages fulfilling lives on a preserved planet.
Evidence-based and pragmatic: Relying on fact-driven analysis to find workable solutions rather than ideology encourages realism balanced with hope.
Collaborative problem-solving: Emphasis on managing interdependence cooperatively rather than confrontation fosters partnership on complex issues.
Respectful of complexity: Appreciation for multiple valid viewpoints and uncertainties reflects tolerance rather than simplistic thinking.
Responsible stewardship: Recognition of humanity's planetary impacts motivates ethical restraint and caretaking of shared natural resources.
Overall, this culture would be globally-minded, future-oriented, solutions-focused, empirically-grounded and driven more by cooperation than competition or unilateralism. It prioritizes sustainable prosperity through nuanced, collaborative problem-solving.
Key wisdoms reflected
Complex interdependence persists - Recognizing interdependence is multifaceted and not subject to simple containment reflects wisdom in understanding connectivity cannot be simplified.
Balance opportunities and risks - Weighing both positive and negative dynamics of globalization shows balanced, nuanced perspective over optimism or alarmism.
Frame shared interest not just obligations - Framing climate change cooperative opportunity, not just threat, recognizes appeal encouraging collective will.
Consider long-term and indirect impacts - Accounting for future generations and biosphere impacts displays forward-thinking about consequences beyond immediate horizon.
Innovate cooperative solutions - Solutions-focused angle on managing interdependence through cooperation rather than conflict reflects practical problem-solving approach.
Represent multiplicity of human development - Holistic perspective on development beyond GDP acknowledges diversity of what progress means.
Embrace change and evolution - Recognizing dynamics evolve and institutions require renovation to remain relevant rather than resist all change.
Overall, the document demonstrates practical wisdom through its balanced, nuanced and adaptive understanding of globalization - recognizing complexity rather than oversimplification, considering multiple perspectives and long-term impacts, and seeking cooperative solutions through principled yet flexible representation of shared challenges.
Quality of reason
The document presents a logical and evidence-based argument for its main conclusions regarding the nature and drivers of global interdependence. Some strengths in the quality of reasoning include:
It clearly outlines the empirical evidence supporting key claims about the persistence of various dimensions of global ties despite a slowdown in some aspects of economic integration. References credible data sources.
Provides theoretical framing around concepts like the Anthropocene to help contextualize evidence and root conclusions in a deeper understanding of dynamics.
Uses multiple examples and case studies to illustrate broader arguments, giving a sense of concrete real-world impacts.
Qualifies some conclusions by noting uncertainty in aspects or acknowledging contradictory evidence, showing nuanced consideration of different perspectives.
Logically draws out implications of evidence presented for how global challenges should be approached going forward.
References other research and literature to supplement analysis and situate within peer-reviewed discourse.
Potential weaknesses are relatively minor, such as not always explicitly stating assumptions underlying some conclusions. But on the whole the quality of reasoning is strong, leveraging empirical observations and logical argumentation to build and support its primary thesis. While individual claims could spur constructive debate, the overall case presented is evidence-based and cogently argued.
Evaluation of potential biases
Ideological/country bias: The analysis takes a relatively impartial, global perspective without undue focus on any one nation, ideology or set of interests.
Confirmation bias: Multiple forms of evidence and perspectives are considered. While certainly aiming to support its central thesis, the assessment does not ignore contradictory evidence.
Financial bias: No direct financial interests are apparent that could bias shaping of arguments. The analysis is presented in academic/informative tone.
Selection bias: A wide range of perspectives on globalization are discussed, not just those fitting a certain viewpoint. The framing acknowledges both opportunities and risks of interdependence.
Anthropic bias: Planetary impacts are given due considerations alongside human-centric factors like economics, showing no bias ignoring environmental dimensions.
Optimism bias: Both positive and negative dynamics of interdependence trends are weighed without just optimism or pessimism about the future state of global ties.
Overall, while any analysis inevitably reflects some viewpoints, I did not find strong evidence of systematic biases skewing the framing, fact-selection or conclusions in ways that would seriously undermine the credibility of the arguments presented. The analysis takes a balanced, evidence-based approach.
Key criteria for evaluating analytical genres and assessment of how this document meets each criterion
Thesis/central argument: The document clearly establishes its central argument that global interdependence persists despite a slowdown in economic integration, and is being reshaped by planetary change and digital technologies.
Evidence/reasoning: The analysis provides empirical evidence and logical reasoning to substantiate its claims about the persistence and reshaping of interdependence.
Objectivity: The tone is reasonably objective without emotive language, focusing on presenting arguments over narrative.
Contextualization: Issues are framed within discussion of macro trends and drivers like the Anthropocene and Digital Revolution.
Implications: The chapter draws implications about better managing interdependence through a global public goods lens.
Referencing: Arguments build on cited research, statistics, concepts from other sources to support points.
Overall, the document performs well against standard evaluation criteria for analytical genres. Its clear thesis, evidence-based reasoning, objective tone and contextual framing, implications drawn, and references used suggest it achieves its aim of analytically examining and explaining dynamics of global interdependence.
#globalization#internationalcooperation#sustainability#climateaction#environment#beyondegrowth#planetaryhealth#futuregenerations#multilateralism#geopolitics#worldpolitics#globalchallenges#geoeconomics#globaleconomy#developmentgoals#sdgs#digitalgovernance#trade#migration#populism#publicpolicy#diplomacy#leadership#research#academia#public policy#human development#UNDP
0 notes
Text
Highlight the crucial role of international collaboration and solidarity in addressing social justice within the framework of multilateralism.
The Permanent Mission of the Kyrgyz Republic to the United Nations and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are pleased to convene the commemorative meeting of the 2024 World Day of Social Justice. In support of the Global Coalition for Social Justice, a ground-breaking initiative aimed at intensifying collective efforts to urgently address social justice deficits and accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Decent Work Agenda, the 2024 World Day of Social Justice commemorative event will highlight the crucial role of international collaboration and solidarity in addressing social justice within the framework of multilateralism. Moreover, it will be a timely opportunity to emphasize the prioritization of social justice at key intergovernmental milestones of the United Nations this year. This includes the Fourth International Conference on Small Island Developing States, the Third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries, the Summit of the Future, as well as preparations for the World Social Summit.
#Fourth International Conference on Small Island Developing States#Third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries#the Summit of the Future#social dialogue#social justice#international labour organization (ilo)#the World Social Summit#multilateralism#international collaboration#international solidarity
0 notes
Text
Building a Better World: Davos Unites Leaders for Climate, Equality, and Innovation #cleanenergyresearchanddevelopment #climatechange #COVID19pandemic #creativity #cuttingedgetechnology #Davos #economicinequality #economicrecovery #multilateralism #NetZeroCarbonCities #positivechange #sustainablefuture #technologicalinnovation #TrillionTrees #vaccinedistribution #virtualparticipation #womenseconomicempowerment #WorldEconomicForum
#Business#cleanenergyresearchanddevelopment#climatechange#COVID19pandemic#creativity#cuttingedgetechnology#Davos#economicinequality#economicrecovery#multilateralism#NetZeroCarbonCities#positivechange#sustainablefuture#technologicalinnovation#TrillionTrees#vaccinedistribution#virtualparticipation#womenseconomicempowerment#WorldEconomicForum
0 notes
Text
Is The United Nations Equipped To Ensure Global Security?
In a world fraught with geopolitical tensions, armed conflicts, and an array of global challenges, the question of whether the United Nations (UN) is equipped to ensure global security is more pertinent than ever.
Since its inception in 1945, the UN has been entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining international peace and security.
However, as the international landscape evolves, so do the challenges faced by the UN in fulfilling this critical role.
The Role Of The United Nations In Global Security
The United Nations was established with the primary objective of preventing wars and conflicts that had ravaged the world during the first half of the 20th century.
Its founders envisioned an organization that would serve as a platform for diplomatic dialogue, conflict resolution, and the promotion of peace and security among nations.
To this end, the UN's cornerstone is the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which holds the primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security.
The Structure Of The United Nations Security Council
The UNSC consists of 15 member states, with five permanent members – the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom – and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms.
This structure, however, has faced criticism for being outdated and unrepresentative of the current global power dynamics.
The five permanent members, often referred to as the P5, possess veto power, allowing them to block any substantive resolution or action, even if the majority of the Council supports it.
This veto power has been a source of contention, as it can hinder the UNSC's ability to respond effectively to crises.
Challenges To UN Security Efforts
Several challenges cast doubt on the UN's ability to ensure global security:
Geopolitical Divisions: The divisions and rivalries among major powers on the UNSC often lead to gridlock and inaction in the face of crises. This was evident in the Syrian conflict and Ukraine crisis, where the P5's conflicting interests hindered meaningful intervention.
Complex Conflicts: Modern conflicts often involve non-state actors, proxy wars, and cyber warfare, which pose new challenges to traditional conflict resolution methods employed by the UN.
Humanitarian Crises: The UN is frequently criticized for its response to humanitarian crises, such as the Rohingya refugee crisis and the conflict in Yemen, where millions suffer due to lack of access to aid.
Resource Constraints: The UN relies on contributions from member states for its peacekeeping missions and humanitarian efforts. Financial constraints can limit its ability to respond adequately to security threats.
Erosion of Norms: The erosion of international norms and the rise of nationalism in some countries have made it more challenging to build consensus on global security issues.
Reforms And The Future Of UN Security
To enhance its effectiveness in ensuring global security, the UN must consider reforms. Reforming the UNSC, including the question of the veto power, is a contentious but necessary step. Expanding the permanent membership to reflect contemporary power dynamics and improving the transparency and accountability of the Council's decisions could bolster its credibility.
Additionally, the UN must adapt to evolving threats. Embracing new technologies, addressing cyber warfare, and developing strategies to counter non-state actors are crucial steps in this direction.
Furthermore, cooperation between the UN and regional organizations, such as the African Union and the European Union, is essential to address regional security challenges effectively.
Conclusion
The question of whether the United Nations is equipped to ensure global security is complex and multifaceted.
While the UN has played a crucial role in preventing large-scale conflicts and promoting peace, it faces numerous challenges in the modern world.
Reforms, increased cooperation, and adaptability to emerging threats are vital for the UN to fulfill its mandate effectively.
Global security remains a collective responsibility, and the United Nations, despite its imperfections, continues to be a central actor in the pursuit of a more peaceful and secure world.
#UnitedNations#GlobalSecurity#UNPeacekeeping#InternationalRelations#ConflictResolution#GlobalDiplomacy#PeaceAndSecurity#UNSecurityCouncil#Multilateralism#GlobalCooperation
0 notes
Text
Youth and Adolescent Girls Driving the 2030 Agenda: Building Collective Power, Securing Sustainable Funding, and Demanding Accountability.
Looking at the impact of the GEF as an innovative, multi-stakeholder approach to multilateralism and the crucial role of young feminist leadership to accelerate the achievement of the SDG agenda.
Side Event at the SDG Action Weekend organized by Young Feminist Europe, Young Feminist Caucus, GEF Action Coalition on Feminist Movements and Leadership, Canada, Malawi, UN Women, Plan International, Adolescent Girl Investment Plan (AGIP), Alliance for Feminist Movements, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), CREA.
To maximize the SDG Summit's impact, the Secretary General is convening an SDG Action Weekend, which will generate opportunities for stakeholders, UN entities, and Member States to convene inside the United Nations Headquarters and set out specific commitments and contributions to drive SDG transformation between now and 2030.
The SDG Action Weekend will consist of the SDG Mobilization Day on Saturday, 16 September, and the SDG Acceleration Day on Sunday, 17 September at UNHQ in New York.
The SDG Action Weekend includes a select number of high-level side-events identified through an open call that concluded in August. They are jointly organized by coalitions of Member States, UN agencies and other international organizations, and global stakeholder networks.
#United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG)#agenda 2030#sdg action#Side-events#Accountability#financing for development#sustainable development goals#multilateralism#sustainable fundings#sdg5#sdg10#multi stakeholder
0 notes
Text
Launch of the United Nations Joint Appeal for Counter-Terrorism in Africa (2023 Counter-Terrorism Week Side-Event).
Launch of the United Nations Joint Appeal for Counter-Terrorism in Africa, co-organized by the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact, the State of Qatar, Morocco, Nigeria and Tunisia. The Joint Appeal supports 10 United Nations inter-agency flagship initiatives across the continent to steer and incentivize a more visible, transparent and effective multilateral contribution to the Global Counter Terrorism Strategy in Africa.
#United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact#Global Counter Terrorism Strategy#Multilateralism#flagship initiatives#Africa#Joint appeal#multilateral contribution#unitetocounterterrrorism#counter terrorism week#side events#panel discussion
0 notes
Text
youtube
#youtube#news#defense#usmilitary#Multilateralism#International Partnerships#Peacebuilding#ANTONY BLINKEN#Diplomatic Relations#Global Development#Global Cooperation#U.S. Secretary of State#Global Inclusion#Human Rights#Global Challenges#Soft Power#International Relations#Foreign Policy#International Diplomacy#Global Governance#Conflict Resolution#United Nations#Diplomacy#Political Leadership#cultural diplomacy#multilateralism#peacebuilding#Antony Blinken#diplomacy strategies
0 notes
Text
A sustainable urban future through inclusive and effective multilateralism: achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in times of global crises.
The second session of the United Nations Habitat Assembly will be held from 5 to 9 June 2023 in Nairobi. Kenya. The theme of the session is "A sustainable urban future through inclusive and effective multilateralism: achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in times of global crises".
0 notes
Text
Global Fragmentation: Persistent Geopolitical and Economic Challenges and Their Impact
The world is facing a multitude of geopolitical and economic challenges, which are driving global fragmentation. This fragmentation is having far-reaching consequences, as it affects economies, politics, and societies. The fragmentation can be seen in various areas, including trade, technology, finance, and security. In this article, we will examine the key drivers of global fragmentation, the…
View On WordPress
#Climate Change#Economic Challenges#Geopolitical Challenges#Global Fragmentation#Income Inequality#International Institutions#Multilateralism#Technological Change
0 notes