#mihai viteazul
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
ancaxbre · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
Illustration for 'Poezii Patriotice-Culegere'(Collection of patriotic poems)
Illustrator: Elena Boariu-Chinschi
1976
21 notes · View notes
rygacripto · 2 years ago
Text
4 notes · View notes
laivinduroriginal · 24 days ago
Text
Drumul spre Marea Unire a României: din Evul Mediu până la 1918
Marea Unire a României, înfăptuită la 1 decembrie 1918, reprezintă punctul culminant al unei lupte seculare pentru unitate și identitate națională. Drumul spre acest ideal a fost marcat de numeroase evenimente istorice, sacrificii și momente de transformare socială și politică, de la Evul Mediu până la începutul secolului XX. În acest articol, vom explora etapele cheie care au condus la…
0 notes
romaniasweetromania · 1 year ago
Text
https://romaniasweetromania.com/2024/01/portrete-ale-voievozilor-romani-ajustari-si-controverse/
Tumblr media
0 notes
jurnaldeoltenia · 1 year ago
Link
0 notes
grecoromanyaoi · 8 months ago
Note
helloo since we're on the topic: top historical fiction (or adjacent) ? can be any time period I just really love your taste in shows/games/etc and am always on the lookout for history inspired media !
thank you!!! im rly glad im like. inspiring other ppl to engage w things im insane abt hudofajsdfdassfsad. anyways. i will probably expand that list bc i literally forgot every single thing i ever read. also i havent watched that many movies so far
ancient times: i havent really watched a lot of movies/series set in ancient times so far :(
rome HBO (2005-2007) (tv series) - OF COURSE. i personally think its one of the best series ever made. they combine political, miliatry history with the lives of every day people in an incredible way. they never let you once engage with the series through modern lenses. according to my teacher (a historian, archeologist & self described 'romaphile') its incredibly historically accurate, mostly the clothing, set designs, characterization, military practices, etc. except for the things they straight up made up, of course.
i really enjoyed gladiator (2000), i think its a masterpiece.
prince of egypt (1998) i guess?
all the asterix movies of course, all the animated ones and most of the live actions. but i wouldnt really call it historical fiction
ok i havent actually finished watching it for now but sebastiane (1976) - an erotic, x rated, gay interpretation of the martyrdom of st sebastian. its in latin also.
wait i cant believe i forgor about assassin's creed odyssey - so far the only one ive played. its so fun and incredibly immersive visually. especially pour moi who cries into the pillow about how ill never experience the ancient world. also you can b a faggot which is always fun. i have things to say about their portrayal of same-sex sexuality and slavery in classical greece but i get why they did that considering its supposed to like. appeal to a lot of people, and a more "historically accurate" portrayal (for example of pederasty or how common slavery was etc.) would b v difficult for a lot of their target audience. alas.
medieval and early modern era:
the name of the rose (1986) - my medieval history teacher literally showed us bits of this movie to teach us about monasteries and monks fhdosiasdjasd.
the borgias (2011-2013) - incredibly messy, lots of political intrigue, and so so fun to watch. about the history of the borgia family. filled to the brim with drama.
the three musketeers (1993) - my favorite adaptation, also coincidentally the one i grew up on. casting tim curry as richelieu was genius. he slays so hard.
i also like bbc's the musketeers (2014-2016) - a neat little series. very fun and entertaining to watch.
outlaw king (2018) - like i dont think most ppl heard of this movie. its about robert the bruce's fight to reclaim the throne of scotland. starring chris pine
vikings (2013-2020) - its fun. i havent watched the entire series tho. dont expect anything resembling historical accuracy
the northman (2022) - you will see something resembling historical accuracy
mihai viteazul (michael the brave) (1971) - a fun movie. very much romanian propaganda tho.
1670 (2023-) - such a fun series!!! incredible cast, shows respect to the actual history and the lives of historical people. really cute and funny.
caravaggio (1986) - a biopic about caravaggio.
wait i also forgor about pentiment - an intriguing, immersive, and incredibly beautiful video game! it has a lot of 'the name of the rose' vibes, with it being a medieval murder mystery taking place in a monastery. its incredibly touching and made me cry, and in the last few years i very rarely cry. also im 99% sure its an indie game? go support the creators!
vaguely-medieval/early modern fantasy:
mirror mirror (2012) - a retelling of snow white. a very fun movie imo, with incredible costume design. julia roberts plays the evil queen and she SLAYS. armie hammer is unfortunately in that movie.
stardust (2007) - one of my fave movies growing up. more modern-inspired but still.
the green knight (2021) - controversial i know but i actually loved this movie! i liked it both as a standalone movie but moreso as a 21st century adaptation to sir gawain and the green knight.
galavant (2015-2016) - !!!!!!! one of the most series ever! they manage to tackle such difficult concepts and conversations with a hilarious wit. so fun to watch. i listen to a lot of the songs still, and rewatch every once in a while.
disenchantment (2018-2023) - very fun to watch, especially the first season.
i also really liked the novel uprooted by naomi novik. its a polish-inspired fantasy.
modern era:
killers of the flower moon (2023) - of course. a masterpiece
aferim! (2015) - a romanian movie set in 19th century wallachia, about two officers, a father and son, who were sent by a nobleman to retrieve an escaped enslaved romani man. a lot of the people in the comments were calling the movie humorous and funny, maybe im missing smth (as im watching with subtitles n dont understand the original language) but it was a very difficult watch for me??
the handmaiden (2016) - need i say more
black sails (2014-2017) - a prequel to the famous novel 'treasure island'. not an easy series to watch. incredibly good.
the favourite (2018) - need i say more pt 2
the rabbi's cat (le chat du rabbin) (2011) - animated movie set in early 20th century algeria. a rabbi's cat learns to talk overnight.
the nice guys (2016) - a fun murder mystery set in the 1970s
o brother, where art thou (2000) - a retelling of the odyssey set in the southern us in the 1930s
victor/victoria (1982) - set in early 20th century paris. julie andrews pretends to be a man and takes on a job as a drag queen. extremely fun, extremely gay movie.
lady chatterley's lover (2022) - very much porn for moms but it was a nice watch imo
amulet (2020) - set in like. idk. sometime in the 20th century. this is a horror movie, deals a lot with misogyny, sa, and so on. i really like it, personally. a lot of people, mostly weird men, dont tho.
the great (2020-2023) - i have mixed feelings about this show. on the one hand, its really fun to watch. on the other hand, its basically ofmd for girls who have public mental breakdowns whenever someone claims corsets were oppressive. and theyre so weird about russians, jesus christ.
disses:
domina (2021-) - i just couldnt get into it, esp since i tried right after finishing rome hbo. it was kind of silly, and not in a good way. takes itself wayyyy to seriously.
i didnt like spartacus (2010-2013) - the dialogue was almost grotesque and the editing, especially the transitions, straight up killed me
damsel (2024) - holy fuck what a trainwreck of a movie. absolute waste of angela basset and robin wright. the only good thing were the costumes.
lancelot du lac (1974) - i just didnt like it at all. couldnt get into it. i guess it was way too french and artsy fartsy for me. a movie that was trying to say both too little and too much at the same time.
i didnt rly like bram stoker's dracula (1992) - i mean. it was a fine movie. it was definitely not the godfather. the movie itself was meh. the visuals tho? absolutely stunning
82 notes · View notes
vladdocs · 3 months ago
Text
CD SHORTS: explaining the IMPALEMENT punishment
"Remember, who started impaling people first!" (Corpus Draculianum, doc. no. 37)"
Vlad Tepes did not impale everyone he laid his hands on, as some propaganda sources have claimed, amplified beyond measure in the modern era by the Dracula myth, Hollywood, and gothic and pop culture. The first cases of impalement in Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages date back to the 13th century and involve the excesses of the Teutonic Knights in Livonia (present-day Lithuania). A document from 1480, almost 4 years after Vlad Tepes' death, is the first attestation of this type of execution in connection with a Wallachian voivode. In this document, Jupan Neagu threatens the Brasov citizens, reminding them of Vlad, who allegedly introduced impalement in the region, with which he punished them so cruelly in his multiple campaigns in southern Transylvania. Tepes respected the written and unwritten laws of the country and the privileges of the nobles. Therefore, no document attests that he ever impaled a boyar or a member of the Basarab dynasty. The elites had the privilege of being beheaded. However, this did not prevent him from impaling their people, as exemplified by the episode of the pretender Dan the Young, who had failed in his attempt to take the throne. Under Ottoman influence, this type of punishment became widespread in the 16th century, the one who used it most frequently being a contemporary of Mihai Viteazul, Alexandru the Bad, at the end of the century. Impalement was not only a punishment but also a grotesque spectacle of power. The condemned were subjected to a particularly painful and slower death than we would expect. The craft of impalement involved avoiding vital organs. The impaled person had to stay alive as long as possible, to struggle, to scream, to beg, so as to shake the onlookers, to terrify them, and to ignite fear in the heart of anyone who would dare to defy the authorities.
10 notes · View notes
romanmigracs · 1 year ago
Text
His movie Mihai Viteazul was considered the best of the Romanian historical movies and is one of the most appreciated world-wide of this kind (for example, considering imdb ratings) . The film was released in 1970 in Romania, and worldwide by Columbia Pictures as The Last Crusade. A TV sequence in Steven Spielberg's "E.T." (original, uncut version) show images from "Mihai Viteazul" (scenes with the Battle of Călugăreni).
a geci seggnyalója Ceauşescunak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergiu_Nicolaescu
2 notes · View notes
massmediatvnews · 1 month ago
Text
Programul Târgului de Crăciun din Craiova
0 notes
danagoian · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
Alături de cel mai fain om de Radio din România, Cristian Hrubaru la Trooper Simfonic: Lansare Album - Mihai Viteazul: Poemele Românilor
0 notes
bartholomaus · 5 months ago
Text
Cazul Posmus ca si celelalte castele si curii (NU "conace"!, Conace / cule sunt in Muntenia) din Ardeal arata ca istoria Ardealului e complexa, frumoasa, pe alocuri frustranta / dureroasa, dar intotdeauna surprinzatoare precum ...viata.
1. Sa incepem chiar cu termenii si cadrajul ("framing"ul): Termenul potrivit de CASTEL / CURIE ne aminteste subtil ca maghiarii (si sasii) au fost, implicit, grupurile care si ele au pastrat vie mostenirea LATINA / "LATINITATEA" in Ardeal - prin folosirea limbii latine in administratie, biserica, scoala, timp de secole. In tot acest rastimp (de secole), romanii / ortodocsii scriau cu caractere chirilice si la biserica li se vorbea in slavona - pana ce, la insistenta sasilor ptotestanti si a unor nobili maghiari, au fost tiparite carti religioase si manuale scolare in limba ...romana!
BONUS: Termenii de CONAC / CULA sunt si ele f graitoare, ele fiind de proveniente turca / orientala /kula = turn).
CONCLUZIE nr. 1: In Ardeal, latinitatea a fost pastrata etnolingvistic de romani, iar cultural-lingvistic de sasi si maghiari. Elemente de orientalism se gasesc etnic la maghiari, iar lingvistic si religios la romani.
2. Despre CONFLICT vs. COOPERARE intre grupurile constitutive din Ardeal: Intr-o societate ierarhica precum cea premoderna, inegalitatea (nobil vs. iobag; confesiuni recepte vs. tolerate / interzise) si el element constitutiv. Interesant ca si societatile moderne contin elemente constitutive si institutionalizate de inegalitate - in Ardeal sub forma etnocratiei, adica a dominatiei unei limbi si grupari etnice, carora celelalte grupuri 2musai" sa se supuna, pentru ca "altfel va fi bai"! Inainte de 1918 erau maghiarii, dupa 1918 sunt, pana astazi, romanii. A se vedea doar monopolul limbii romane ca singura limba oficiala, a colonizarii de etnici romani in zonele candva predominant nonromanesti cat si a drapelului Romaniei, fara dreptul de a przenta pe cladiri oficiale si alte drapele.
Deoarece istoria Ardealului este complexa, conflictele si cooperarile sociale sau interetnice de la noi au decurs in esenta foarte diferit de cum propaganda naationalista romaneasca le-a prezentat de la 1918 incoace. Astfel,
a.) Au existat si numerosi nobili de origine romana (si germana), nu doar maghiara, la fel cum au existat si iobagi maghiari si sasi, nu doar romani.
b.) In Tara Hategului exista o intrepatrundere deja istorica intre nobili maghiari si romani - prin care se estompeaza si delimitarile etnice clare dintre cele doua etnii - similar cu ceangaii din Moldova, supusi romanizarii fortate si care acuma formeaza o cultura romano-maghiara.
c.) Rascoalele taranesti au fost conduse de maghiari, nu de romani (Budai, Dozsa).
d.) Romanii isi datoreaza majoritatea demografica in Ardeal tocmai celor pe care au fost invatati sa-i urasca: nobililor maghiari. Acestia i-au colonizat in numar semnificativ pe mosiile si in satele lor, iar romanii au preferat sa vina in numar mare ca iobagi la groful ungur decat sa ramana iobagi la boierul roman din Muntenia sau Moldova. Mai ales dupa raidurile destructive ale lui Mihai Patrascu (zis si "Viteazul" - care, by the way, NU a unit ABSOLUT NIMIC, ci doar fusese temporar voievod in MT, MD si TS), deci dupa ale sale raiduri, jefuri si maceluri prin zonele sasesti si unguresti ale Ardealului, numeroase sate si mosii nobiliare / maghiare au devenit subit majoritar romanesti, in urma influxului de romani, adusi chiar de nobili, pt a relua productia agricola. Exemple notorii sunt satele de pe Valea Muresului in amonte si aval de Alba Iulia cat si in Campia Transilvaniei. Prin sporul demografic superior, romanii, la 1918 avea sau aiba acel procentaj de 4-10% in plus fata de nonromani (55% vs. 45% din totalul populatiei) - pretext "suficient" pentru Antanta si Guvernul Roman aflat a Iasi de a inscena la 1 decembrie 1918 la Alba Iulia acea reuniune a 1228 de reprezentanti ai romanilor care sa declare (unilateral) "unirea" cu Regatul Romaniei, omitandu-se astfel organizarea unui REFERENDUM care referendum f probabil NU ar fi produs o majoritate pentru "unirea" cu Romania.
CONCLUZIE nr. 2: Pentru a ascunde toate aceste adevaruri incomode despre cat de fraudulos a fost pasat Ardealul, Banatul si parti din Ungaria de Est ("Crisana") Romaniei, istoriografia romaneasca a inventat conflictul etern (in realitate unul foarte punctual si sporadic) dintre romani si maghiari.
QED.
0 notes
laivinduroriginal · 2 months ago
Text
Moștenirea Romană în Istoria României: De la Dacia la România Modernă
Istoria României este strâns legată de o combinație complexă de culturi și influențe, dintre care una dintre cele mai semnificative este moștenirea romană. Deși rădăcinile dacice sunt importante, cucerirea și colonizarea romană au modelat o mare parte din dezvoltarea culturală, lingvistică și politică a regiunii. Acest articol va explora cum stăpânirea romană a lăsat o moștenire de durată asupra…
1 note · View note
umorderas · 9 months ago
Video
youtube
👉😱ucigașul lui Mihai Viteazul!😁👌
0 notes
romanasuloriginal · 1 year ago
Text
Istoria României este presărată cu poveș... #Romania https://romanasul.ro/conducatorii-romaniei-tradati-si-ucisi-la-ordinul-puterilor-straine/?feed_id=952&_unique_id=65810d0934770
0 notes
barsand · 1 year ago
Text
Rolul lui Mihai Viteazul în unire românilor
Mihai Viteazul nu a jucat un rol direct în Marea Unire de la 1918. Este important să facem o distincție între Mihai Viteazul și Regele Ferdinand I al României, care a avut un rol semnificativ în realizarea unirii teritoriilor locuite predominant de români în timpul Primului Război Mondial. Mihai Viteazul a fost un domnitor al Țării Românești și al Moldovei în secolul al XVI-lea. În timpul…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
muzicafilmedivertisment · 2 years ago
Video
Mihai Viteazul Trailer #film #Istoric #mscastudiotim @mscastudiotim2023
0 notes