#lily gladstone icons

[editfandom]

Jax - Fancy Dance, 2023

[bluemarinedoll]

oscars '24

[tokyicons]

[whamicon]

“This is a historic win, it doesn’t belong to just me… This is for every little rez kid, every little urban kid, every little Native kid out there who has a dream, who is seeing themselves represented and our stories told, by ourselves, in our own words.”

[tudojuntoemisturado]

{Lily Gladstone icons}

please like or reblog if you save :)

[gt-icons]

Random Actress icons

‒ like or reblog if you save

[inthemoodforicons]

Lily Gladstone as Mollie Burkhart in Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)

dir. Martin Scorsese

[snflwricons]

im so in love with lily gladstone and jacob elordi and cailee spaeny and

[midnightisquiet]

Hello, Sandra! I would love some icons of Lily Gladstone (in or out of character in Killers of a Flower Moon).

Sure:

like/reblog if you take, please! let me know if you want a different color

5 more icons under the cut

[pynkhues]

I love watching shows but never really follow the cast but with iwtv I am kinda doing it with Jacob and Sam now, in terms of watching interviews etc. and their chemistry and friendship is so good. I imagine a lot of that is like the forced proximity but it also feels very sincere idk if most casts are like this but im really enjoying them

It is! I've talked about it a little bit in another post which tumblr's search function is not being helpful with, haha, but I think there were a whole bunch of circumstances at play probably with Jacob and Sam forming the relationship they did. In particular, I think it was probably a perfect storm of the pandemic intensifying the circumstances, both being at similar points in their careers in that they'd been jobbing actors but were becoming established in their home countries and so IWTV marked a huge step up for them both professionally given they're lead roles / it's a high budget series/ a US production, and that they seem to have pretty similar ideas about not just what they're adapting, but the culture they want to create on set as the actors at the top of the call sheet, and their processes more generally.

I think it's the latter thing that often is a pretty major influence too? The last two fandoms I've been in were Succession and Good Girls, and those casts had very different dynamics. The Succession cast - particularly the actors playing the father+siblings I think fell into that family relationship a bit, which in my experience isn't all that uncommon, so while there was a lot of love (and Sarah seemed closest with basically everyone), they also as a cast pretty clearly annoyed each other in that sibling-way too (Jeremy was actually the one to say that they literally feel like a family for better and worse to which Kieran very much nodded, haha). I think it was compounded by the cast clearly having very different approaches to acting too (Brian Cox being traditional-Shakespearean, Jeremy Strong being method, Kieran Culkin increasingly improvising / trying to make the others break) which is lowkey funny to me, but I can understand why that would create friction. It probably wasn't helped by the fact that members of the cast knew each other before the show and that many of the leads were at very different stages of their careers.

They seem to talk a lot less in general, but also seem to still be supporting each other's new projects and a lot of them have been spotted at each other's theatre shows over the last year even, so I think the love is genuinely still there.

Good Girls there was like, one person (the fan favourite and half of the main ship at that, lol) who very much had a rift with the rest of the cast, but the three lead actresses had (and still have!) an extremely adorable friendship. Retta and Mae Whitman were even recently at Christina's wedding and they all even regularly post nostalgically about working together on Instagram even though the show ended three years, which is really cute.

But yeah, there are also a lot of casts who are just colleagues or even hate each other's guts, haha, so we've truly lucked out with this cast. Hopefully it stays that way!

[editfandom]

Mollie Burkhart - Killers of the Flower Moon, 2023

[tokyicons]

[sergeant-angels-trashcan]

Casually looking up Lily Gladstone to see if she is married and I--

UHHHHH?!?! Did someone say Icon???

[gemsofgreece]

Opinion on Poor Things (maybe unpopular):

I finally got to watch the movie a few days before the Oscars. From the rest of the nominees, I have also watched Barbie (won't get it), the Killers of the Flower Moon and I intend to watch Oppenheimer. I won't have time to watch any of the rest before the awards.

The funny conclusion I landed on after watching Poor Things is that I liked it for all the reasons that most others considered as only secondary virtues.

The acting is cool, including obviously Emma Stone's, but I am not exactly sure it's Oscar-worthy but then again I don't know how good the other nominees were, except for Lily Gladstone, whose performance was subtle yet amazing. However, this one which has also its own share of fan admiration, was in my opinion too subtle for its own good. Like, yeah, that perfectly accurate face of internal resignation but is it award worthy when it's the same face for nearly four hours? Back to Stone, I have this feeling her performance is more praised due to how risky and demanding it was (almost certainly the riskiest performance by a big name in Hollywood) rather than for how excellent it was in itself.

It's interesting how this movie did not pass the message to me at all. I got what it meant to explore; sexual liberation, freedom, living the moment, enjoying life, women taking their place in the world and fields gatekept by men, the fragile male ego but... for a movie that is so supposed to be about finding yourself, exploring the world and living your life, it's amazing that it did not generate a single (1) emotion in me. Ironically, I didn't get how Bella was better than other conventional ordinary people resigned in their misery and societal expectations. How was Bella happier or wiser than any of those? When she ate 100 pastries and then threw them up? When she drank so much, she passed out in a corner and had a headache? When she had countless sexual encounters that eventually were mechanical and made no difference to her? When her impulsiveness led her to the [SPOILER] man that she once killed herself to avoid? Where exactly do we see her being assisted by her lack of filter and inhibitions? Furthermore, her empathy is entirely unconvincing (regarding the injustice and misery in the world) because in most other scenes she seems to be totally capable of cruelty. I am making all these points, not so much as a critique to the movie but because I was baffled by so many people saying "Bella was an icon and she had figured out how to live life and we are all trapped and unable to follow her example". How many pastries and bad fucks it takes to find the meaning of life?! Um, no. In the end, Bella ends up [SPOILER] back in her home studying anatomy, things that she could have done anyway as she grew without ever leaving Baxter's side. I am not saying it was wrong of her to leave or to make those choices she made (although of course several were just stupid), I am just commenting on how surprising it was that many people viewed this as a new positive take in life when we weren't even rewarded with one deep emotion. Bella hardly loves, hardly hates, never truly connects with nature (apart from an one second long scene in the beginning and those walks in sunglasses which are still very superficial) and the sense of being and still basically does not "understand" the world despite all the philosophy she reads. There is nothing profound about her. She has grown in the end but she is not changed. She just likes anatomy and sex. That was the case in the beginning and that is in the end. Oh, plus she throws some wordy meaningless sentences with a totally expressionless face. I guess the pacing was a little off and a better one could have helped make these themes be explored more thoroughly. But it's unacceptable for a movie of such a premise to not provide any heartwarming feeling or any thrill. It's just a very bizarre comedy. It does that well. But Bella is not really an icon to me. Nobody in this movie is a role model about how to view life. Maybe for how to NOT live it. Just a lot of diverse clutter but no real happiness or living.

The funny thing is that the most Oscar worthy aspects of this film were the technical ones and the direction (and I don't say this because I am Greek). I found Lanthimos' direction ingenious, eccentric, gripping. The cinematography and the visual effects are truly beautiful. The music and the costumes are very interesting as well.

I expect Nolan to take the Oscar, even though I haven't watched the movie yet, because 1) America and 2) I bet his direction was conventionally flawless and this certainly is appealing to Hollywood. But I really wish Lanthimos got some acknowledgment for this. Then again Lanthimos should have done a better pacing in the third part of the film or explore emotions better. On the other hand, Nolan's movie is three hours. I need to watch to see how effortlessly those 3 hours pass. Scorsese with his effing 3,5 hours won't get it either, however I will say that the premise of the movie was far more heart-wrenching and shocking to me. I had no idea this was an actual thing happening there. Killers of the Flower Moon was for me far more thought-provoking than Poor Things (or Barbie but I consider Barbie far inferior to all the rest).

I still gave Poor Things an 8/10 because it is enjoyable to watch.

P.S It took a short of a few seconds to be certain Robert Downey Junior should take the supporting role oscar and not Mark Ruffalo with his far too cartoonish performance.

[betty-burnout]

can we talk about lily gladstone being on the verge of quitting acting and then getting a call from scorsese to be in KOTFM and now being nominated for the highest award in her category???? icon