#like. i get it

[bklily]

The Wish Upon a Star event ends in such a jumpscare I'm still feeling the whiplash to this day.

Bonus:

[team-moonlark]

"it's fiction but that still means it's bad and you're a bad person for liking the fictional thing and i will yell at you and scream at you over this fictional thing--" bro do you even hear yourself?

[lovebunnie]

something something a nickel for every time ahsoka tano denied training a student when they were desperate to learn because she was afraid of continuing a legacy and organization that failed her… id have three nickels.. which IS a lot and its weird its happened thrice

[nightshade-anura]

do i think nico should be in a relationship in his current mental state? fuck no. do i also recognise that rick would get absolutely destroyed by his fans if the only major character who wasn't in a relationship or dead by the end of the books was also the only canonically queer major character? also yes.

[orange-cheetah]

i do not want to be here for kuroshitsuji 209 i do not want to be here

[400badrequest]

how. do i convince my parents to stop trying to convince me to job the defence force for retirement benefits

[sxilor-1010]

Would it be a terrible take if I said I don't like the ship megstar (Megatron x Starscream) in the transformers community- /genq

[puppets-are-overreated]

Okay I'm not the only one to say you shouldn't ship dreammare but just be mindful that Dream and Nightmare is someone else ocs who's very discomfortable with Dream and Nightmare getting shiped!!! Its like when someone uses your oc for hate art or for ai or just using your oc that you don't want it to be use for.

Honestly, if the utau community genuinely believes that characters like Swap can just be given away to the community because the creator is problematic, then who tf cares if I get a lil weird w some of my ships

[aphel1on]

getou suguru is like if gifted kid burnout came with a body count and honestly he's so real for that

[veil-of-lament]

the way my mother laughed at "you go too fast for me" i'm gonna--

[femmefitz]

I would think this post is fun but the girl careers are boring and football is kinda the worst sport around. Come on.

[biblicalhorror]

I personally think Anna Marks was not trying to villanize her for not coming out, nor was she attempting to force her out of the closet herself. I think, like many gaylors, Marks was operating under the assumption that Taylor had already effectively "come out" as much as she ever intended to. The article I read never said anything that, to me, was saying Taylor Swift is an evil person for not coming out. If anything, my interpretation of the article is that it was meant to be one of those "we see you (already effectively "out" celebrity) and we accept you" kinds of posts, which would be fine if she posted it on her personal Tumblr or Twitter or Tiktok or whatever. The issue is that she didn't do those things. She posted this article on one of the largest news publications in the world, essentially forcing Taylor (or in this case her "associate") to comment on it publicly. And if Marks is at all familiar with online gaylor dynamics, she should be well aware that pretty much any public statement from Taylor's camp regarding gaylor is the #1 way to flood social media with overt homophobia in the swiftie community, for which her queer fans (gaylor or not) will always be casualties.

I might be more charitable with this article than it deserves, but after a second read, I honestly don't think the intent was ever to be malicious towards Taylor. Through all of her musings over whether anyone is "owed" a coming out, she ultimately seems to come to the conclusion that it is simply the acknowledgement of the "possibility" of queer readings in Taylor's work that can bring the overall culture to a place of higher acceptance of all identities, regardless of what Taylor's actual identity may or may not be. Overall, I agree with that sentiment. I do, however, think it was irresponsible and careless to post this in the way that she did. I'm sure, in the long run, Taylor will be fine if someone in the NYT posts an article saying, "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if she was gay? We should all rewire our brains to try not to immediately cling to heterosexual messaging as the default." However, precisely because we live in a world that is NOT accepting of that possibility, posting an article like that in a publication that large, PARTICULARLY when focused on one of the biggest celebrities in the world, is inviting a shitstorm of epic proportions to the very population you claim to be liberating.

[chronicowboy]

do u remember when they dropped the chris is in the room pics but conveniently cropped out eddie's fucking devastation in the background? that was deranged.

[malikson]

the evil dead rise movie, or as i like to call it, having a category five girl moment

[theonlythingimfuckingisstupid]

why is getting a job only the beginning?

[lilbirdblu]

me, trying to create the egg's lullaby playlist on youtube VS youtube making it damn near impossible