#law enforcement software market | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

ict-marketresearch-reports · 2 years

Text

Law Enforcement Software Market Strategy and Remarkable Growth Rate By 2026

According to a research report "Law Enforcement Software Market Trends by Component, Solution (Digital Policing, Computer-Aided Dispatch, Jail Management), Service (Consulting, Training and Support, Implementation), Deployment Model (Cloud and On-premises), and Region - Global Forecast to 2026", size is expected to grow from USD 12.6 billion in 2020 to USD 22.1 billion by 2026, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.8% during the forecast period. The Increased demand for law enforcement solutions during COVID 19, rising numbers of crimes, increased focus on community-oriented policing, and growing investments for public safety measures in smart city projects are a few factors driving the growth of the law enforcement solutions and services.

The market is expected to be driven by the increased need to automate processes of law enforcement agencies

The law enforcement software solutions automate repetitive manual processes and workflows. The solutions segment is estimated to account for the largest market size in 2020. In today’s global business environment, the threats against government organizations, public safety agencies, and law enforcement agencies are greater than ever. Due to the increasing severity of crimes, law enforcement agencies need to be empowered with solutions backed with cutting-edge technologies. The increased investments by law enforcement software vendors in AI, ML, analytics, and IoT play an important role in the rise in the adoption of law enforcement solutions. Giants including IBM, Accenture, Axon, and Motorola Solutions are leveraging these technologies to offer better solutions. These solutions have gained traction due to several benefits such as enhanced departmental operations, better compliance, precise results due to automation, and safety towards critical data

Increased scalability and flexibility is driving the adoption of cloud-based deployment

Law enforcement agencies are moving from on-premises to cloud deployment, as cloud deployment reduces the overall costs, provides flexibility with advanced technology, offers scalable access to solutions, ensures the enforcement of security compliances, and enhances business efficiency. Law enforcement software solutions can be deployed as a SaaS-based offering, which enables multiple users to gain control of the cloud infrastructure through the internet. It is a standard model that enables service providers to grant public access to resources, such as applications and storage, through the internet. Cloud services may be offered free of cost or on the pay-per-use model, depending on the requirements of the end users. Public cloud is highly adopted among cloud storage providers due to the ease of access and faster deployment. This cloud deployment model offers various benefits to enterprises, such as scalability, reliability, flexibility, and remote location access. Cloud is more preferred by enterprises that have fewer regulatory hurdles and are willing to partially or fully outsource their storage facilities. The major concern with the cloud is data security, due to which many enterprises are shifting to private and hybrid cloud solutions.

North America to dominate the global law enforcement software market in 2020

North America has always been technologically ahead in terms of the adoption of advanced technologies. North American countries have sustainable and well-established economies, empowering them to invest in R&D activities and thus contributing to the development of new technologies strongly. Various government and law enforcement agencies in the US and Canada are taking initiatives to strengthen the security infrastructure. For instance, the Canadian government established the Canadian Cyber Incident Response Center to monitor cybersecurity incidents in the country and make plans to eliminate them. With terrorist organizations increasingly using the internet to aid their agenda of fundraising and propaganda activities, the Canadian Government is undertaking public awareness and outreach activities to educate citizens related to the potential dangers of cyberspace. The US and Canadian governments are continuously working with law enforcement agencies to prevent violent extremism and counterterrorism-related activities. The prominent law enforcement software vendors in the region include IBM, Motorola Solutions, and Axon. These vendors are investing heavily toward the adoption of cloud-based law enforcement solutions.

The major players have implemented various growth strategies to expand their global presence and increase their market shares. Key players such as IBM, Accenture, Motorola Solutions, Axon, and NICE have majorly adopted many growth strategies, such as new product launches, acquisitions, and partnerships, to expand their product portfolios and grow further in the law enforcement software market.

About MarketsandMarkets™

MarketsandMarkets™ provides quantified B2B research on 30,000 high growth niche opportunities/threats which will impact 70% to 80% of worldwide companies’ revenues. Currently servicing 7500 customers worldwide including 80% of global Fortune 1000 companies as clients. Almost 75,000 top officers across eight industries worldwide approach MarketsandMarkets™ for their painpoints around revenues decisions.

Our 850 fulltime analyst and SMEs at MarketsandMarkets™ are tracking global high growth markets following the "Growth Engagement Model – GEM". The GEM aims at proactive collaboration with the clients to identify new opportunities, identify most important customers, write "Attack, avoid and defend" strategies, identify sources of incremental revenues for both the company and its competitors. MarketsandMarkets™ now coming up with 1,500 MicroQuadrants (Positioning top players across leaders, emerging companies, innovators, strategic players) annually in high growth emerging segments. MarketsandMarkets™ is determined to benefit more than 10,000 companies this year for their revenue planning and help them take their innovations/disruptions early to the market by providing them research ahead of the curve.

MarketsandMarkets’s flagship competitive intelligence and market research platform, "Knowledgestore" connects over 200,000 markets and entire value chains for deeper understanding of the unmet insights along with market sizing and forecasts of niche markets.

Contact:

Mr. Aashish Mehra

MarketsandMarkets™ INC.

630 Dundee Road

Suite 430

Northbrook, IL 60062

USA : 1-888-600-6441

[email protected]

#law enforcement software market trends

0 notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 3 months

Text

Microsoft pinky swears that THIS TIME they’ll make security a priority

One June 20, I'm live onstage in LOS ANGELES for a recording of the GO FACT YOURSELF podcast. On June 21, I'm doing an ONLINE READING for the LOCUS AWARDS at 16hPT. On June 22, I'll be in OAKLAND, CA for a panel and a keynote at the LOCUS AWARDS.

As the old saying goes, "When someone tells you who they are and you get fooled again, shame on you." That goes double for Microsoft, especially when it comes to security promises.

Microsoft is, was, always has been, and always will be a rotten company. At every turn, throughout their history, they have learned the wrong lessons, over and over again.

That starts from the very earliest days, when the company was still called "Micro-Soft." Young Bill Gates was given a sweetheart deal to supply the operating system for IBM's PC, thanks to his mother's connection. The nepo-baby enlisted his pal, Paul Allen (whom he'd later rip off for billions) and together, they bought someone else's OS (and took credit for creating it – AKA, the "Musk gambit").

Microsoft then proceeded to make a fortune by monopolizing the OS market through illegal, collusive arrangements with the PC clone industry – an industry that only existed because they could source third-party PC ROMs from Phoenix:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/ibm-pc-compatible-how-adversarial-interoperability-saved-pcs-monopolization

Bill Gates didn't become one of the richest people on earth simply by emerging from a lucky orifice; he also owed his success to vigorous antitrust enforcement. The IBM PC was the company's first major initiative after it was targeted by the DOJ for a 12-year antitrust enforcement action. IBM tapped its vast monopoly profits to fight the DOJ, spending more on outside counsel to fight the DOJ antitrust division than the DOJ spent on all its antitrust lawyers, every year, for 12 years.

IBM's delaying tactic paid off. When Reagan took the White House, he let IBM off the hook. But the company was still seriously scarred by its ordeal, and when the PC project kicked off, the company kept the OS separate from the hardware (one of the DOJ's major issues with IBM's previous behavior was its vertical monopoly on hardware and software). IBM didn't hire Gates and Allen to provide it with DOS because it was incapable of writing a PC operating system: they did it to keep the DOJ from kicking down their door again.

The post-antitrust, gunshy IBM kept delivering dividends for Microsoft. When IBM turned a blind eye to the cloned PC-ROM and allowed companies like Compaq, Dell and Gateway to compete directly with Big Blue, this produced a whole cohort of customers for Microsoft – customers Microsoft could play off on each other, ensuring that every PC sold generated income for Microsoft, creating a wide moat around the OS business that kept other OS vendors out of the market. Why invest in making an OS when every hardware company already had an exclusive arrangement with Microsoft?

The IBM PC story teaches us two things: stronger antitrust enforcement spurs innovation and opens markets for scrappy startups to grow to big, important firms; as do weaker IP protections.

Microsoft learned the opposite: monopolies are wildly profitable; expansive IP protects monopolies; you can violate antitrust laws so long as you have enough monopoly profits rolling in to outspend the government until a Republican bootlicker takes the White House (Microsoft's antitrust ordeal ended after GW Bush stole the 2000 election and dropped the charges against them). Microsoft embodies the idea that you either die a rebel hero or live long enough to become the evil emperor you dethroned.

From the first, Microsoft has pursued three goals:

Get too big to fail;

Get too big to jail;

Get too big to care.

It has succeeded on all three counts. Much of Microsoft's enduring power comes from succeeded IBM as the company that mediocre IT managers can safely buy from without being blamed for the poor quality of Microsoft's products: "Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft" is 2024's answer to "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM."

Microsoft's secret sauce is impunity. The PC companies that bundle Windows with their hardware are held blameless for the glaring defects in Windows. The IT managers who buy company-wide Windows licenses are likewise insulated from the rage of the workers who have to use Windows and other Microsoft products.

Microsoft doesn't have to care if you hate it because, for the most part, it's not selling to you. It's selling to a few decision-makers who can be wined and dined and flattered. And since we all have to use its products, developers have to target its platform if they want to sell us their software.

This rarified position has afforded Microsoft enormous freedom to roll out harebrained "features" that made things briefly attractive for some group of developers it was hoping to tempt into its sticky-trap. Remember when it put a Turing-complete scripting environment into Microsoft Office and unleashed a plague of macro viruses that wiped out years worth of work for entire businesses?

https://web.archive.org/web/20060325224147/http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/newsinfo/collateral.aspx?cid=33338

It wasn't just Office; Microsoft's operating systems have harbored festering swamps of godawful defects that were weaponized by trolls, script kiddies, and nation-states:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EternalBlue

Microsoft blamed everyone except themselves for these defects, claiming that their poor code quality was no worse than others, insisting that the bulging arsenal of Windows-specific malware was the result of being the juiciest target and thus the subject of the most malicious attention.

Even if you take them at their word here, that's still no excuse. Microsoft didn't slip and accidentally become an operating system monopolist. They relentlessly, deliberately, illegally pursued the goal of extinguishing every OS except their own. It's completely foreseeable that this dominance would make their products the subject of continuous attacks.

There's an implicit bargain that every monopolist makes: allow me to dominate my market and I will be a benevolent dictator who spends his windfall profits on maintaining product quality and security. Indeed, if we permit "wasteful competition" to erode the margins of operating system vendors, who will have a surplus sufficient to meet the security investment demands of the digital world?

But monopolists always violate this bargain. When faced with the decision to either invest in quality and security, or hand billions of dollars to their shareholders, they'll always take the latter. Why wouldn't they? Once they have a monopoly, they don't have to worry about losing customers to a competitor, so why invest in customer satisfaction? That's how Google can piss away $80b on a stock buyback and fire 12,000 technical employees at the same time as its flagship search product (with a 90% market-share) is turning into an unusable pile of shit:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/21/im-feeling-unlucky/#not-up-to-the-task

Microsoft reneged on this bargain from day one, and they never stopped. When the company moved Office to the cloud, it added an "analytics" suite that lets bosses spy on and stack-rank their employees ("Sorry, fella, Office365 says you're the slowest typist in the company, so you're fired"). Microsoft will also sell you internal data on the Office365 usage of your industry competitors (they'll sell your data to your competitors, too, natch). But most of all, Microsoft harvest, analyzes and sells this data for its own purposes:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/11/25/the-peoples-amazon/#clippys-revenge

Leave aside how creepy, gross and exploitative this is – it's also incredibly reckless. Microsoft is creating a two-way conduit into the majority of the world's businesses that insider threats, security services and hackers can exploit to spy on and wreck Microsoft's customers' business. You don't get more "too big to care" than this.

Or at least, not until now. Microsoft recently announced a product called "Recall" that would record every keystroke, click and screen element, nominally in the name of helping you figure out what you've done and either do it again, or go back and fix it. The problem here is that anyone who gains access to your system – your boss, a spy, a cop, a Microsoft insider, a stalker, an abusive partner or a hacker – now has access to everything, on a platter. Naturally, this system – which Microsoft billed as ultra-secure – was wildly insecure and after a series of blockbuster exploits, the company was forced to hit pause on the rollout:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/microsoft-delays-data-scraping-recall-feature-again-commits-to-public-beta-test/

For years, Microsoft waged a war on the single most important security practice in software development: transparency. This is the company that branded the GPL Free Software license a "virus" and called open source "a cancer." The company argued that allowing public scrutiny of code would be a disaster because bad guys would spot and weaponize defects.

This is "security through obscurity" and it's an idea that was discredited nearly 500 years ago with the advent of the scientific method. The crux of that method: we are so good at bullshiting ourselves into thinking that our experiment was successful that the only way to make sure we know anything is to tell our enemies what we think we've proved so they can try to tear us down.

Or, as Bruce Schneier puts it: "Anyone can design a security system that you yourself can't think of a way of breaking. That doesn't mean it works, it just means that it works against people stupider than you."

And yet, Microsoft – whose made more widely and consequentially exploited software than anyone else in the history of the human race – claimed that free and open code was insecure, and spent millions on deceptive PR campaigns intended to discredit the scientific method in favor of a kind of software alchemy, in which every coder toils in secret, assuring themselves that drinking mercury is the secret to eternal life.

Access to source code isn't sufficient to make software secure – nothing about access to code guarantees that anyone will review that code and repair its defects. Indeed, there've been some high profile examples of "supply chain attacks" in the free/open source software world:

https://www.securityweek.com/supply-chain-attack-major-linux-distributions-impacted-by-xz-utils-backdoor/

But there's no good argument that this code would have been more secure if it had been harder for the good guys to spot its bugs. When it comes to secure code, transparency is an essential, but it's not a sufficency.

The architects of that campaign are genuinely awful people, and yet they're revered as heroes by Microsoft's current leadership. There's Steve "Linux Is Cancer" Ballmer, star of Propublica's IRS Files, where he is shown to be the king of "tax loss harvesting":

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/24/tax-loss-harvesting/#mego

And also the most prominent example of the disgusting tax cheats practiced by rich sports-team owners:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/07/08/tuyul-apps/#economic-substance-doctrine

Microsoft may give lip service to open source these days (mostly through buying, stripmining and enclosing Github) but Ballmer's legacy lives on within the company, through its wildly illegal tax-evasion tactics:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/13/pour-encoragez-les-autres/#micros-tilde-one

But Ballmer is an angel compared to his boss, Bill Gates, last seen some paragraphs above, stealing the credit for MS DOS from Tim Paterson and billions of dollars from his co-founder Paul Allen. Gates is an odious creep who made billions through corrupt tech industry practices, then used them to wield influence over the world's politics and policy. The Gates Foundation (and Gates personally) invented vaccine apartheid, helped kill access to AIDS vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa, then repeated the trick to keep covid vaccines out of reach of the Global South:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/13/public-interest-pharma/#gates-foundation

The Gates Foundation wants us to think of it as malaria-fighting heroes, but they're also the leaders of the war against public education, and have been key to the replacement of public schools with charter schools, where the poorest kids in America serve as experimental subjects for the failed pet theories of billionaire dilettantes:

https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/millionaire-driven-education-reform-has-failed-heres-what-works

(On a personal level, Gates is also a serial sexual abuser who harassed multiple subordinates into having sexual affairs with him:)

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/13/technology/microsoft-sexual-harassment-policy-review.html

The management culture of Microsoft started rotten and never improved. It's a company with corruption and monopoly in its blood, a firm that would always rather build market power to insulate itself from the consequences of making defective products than actually make good products. This is true of every division, from cloud computing:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/09/28/other-peoples-computers/#clouded-over

To gaming:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/27/convicted-monopolist/#microsquish

No one should ever trust Microsoft to do anything that benefits anyone except Microsoft. One of the low points in the otherwise wonderful surge of tech worker labor organizing was when the Communications Workers of America endorsed Microsoft's acquisition of Activision because Microsoft promised not to union-bust Activision employees. They lied:

https://80.lv/articles/qa-workers-contracted-by-microsoft-say-they-were-fired-for-trying-to-unionize/

Repeatedly:

https://www.reuters.com/technology/activision-fired-staff-using-strong-language-about-remote-work-policy-union-2023-03-01/

Why wouldn't they lie? They've never faced any consequences for lying in the past. Remember: the secret to Microsoft's billions is impunity.

Which brings me to Solarwinds. Solarwinds is an enterprise management tool that allows IT managers to see, patch and control the computers they oversee. Foreign spies hacked Solarwinds and accessed a variety of US federal agencies, including National Nuclear Security Administration (who oversee nuclear weapons stockpiles), the NIH, and the Treasury Department.

When the Solarwinds story broke, Microsoft strenuously denied that the Solarwinds hack relied on exploiting defects in Microsoft software. They said this to everyone: the press, the Pentagon, and Congress.

This was a lie. As Renee Dudley and Doris Burke reported for Propublica, the Solarwinds attack relied on defects in the SAML authentication system that Microsoft's own senior security staff had identified and repeatedly warned management about. Microsoft's leadership ignored these warnings, buried the research, prohibited anyone from warning Microsoft customers, and sidelined Andrew Harris, the researcher who discovered the defect:

https://www.propublica.org/article/microsoft-solarwinds-golden-saml-data-breach-russian-hackers

The single most consequential cyberattack on the US government was only possible because Microsoft decided not to fix a profound and dangerous bug in its code, and declined to warn anyone who relied on this defective software.

Yesterday, Microsoft president Brad Smith testified about this to Congress, and promised that the company would henceforth prioritize security over gimmicks like AI:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/06/microsoft-in-damage-control-mode-says-it-will-prioritize-security-over-ai/

Despite all the reasons to mistrust this promise, the company is hoping Congress will believe it. More importantly, it's hoping that the Pentagon will believe it, because the Pentagon is about to award billions in free no-bid military contract profits to Microsoft:

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/17/pentagon-weighs-microsoft-licensing-upgrades

You know what? I bet they'll sell this lie. It won't be the first time they've convinced Serious People in charge of billions of dollars and/or lives to ignore that all-important maxim, "When someone tells you who they are and you get fooled again, shame on you."

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/14/patch-tuesday/#fool-me-twice-we-dont-get-fooled-again

#pluralistic #microsoft #infosec #visual basic #ai #corruption #too big to care #patch tuesday #solar winds #monopolists bargain #eternal blue #transparency #open source #floss #oss #apts

275 notes · View notes

ezekiel-krishna · 5 months

Text

Your Planet and Careers (Vedic Astrology)💼

The 10th house in Vedic Astrology is known as the Karma Bhava. This celestial abode holds the key to one's career, profession, reputation, and public image. Now let's uncover the profound impact that planets residing in the 10th house can have on an individual's career path and their potential for success in the professional realm.

Sun (Surya)

When the Sun graces the 10th house, it signifies qualities of leadership, ambition, and a strong drive for success. Those with this placement may find success in government roles, politics, administration, management, or any field that demands authority and visibility.

Moon (Chandra)

The Moon in the 10th house suggests a career in nurturing, caregiving, or public service. Individuals with this placement may excel in professions like nursing, social work, psychology, or any occupation involving interaction with the public.

Mars (Mangala)

Mars in the 10th house indicates a competitive and determined nature, making individuals suitable for careers in sports, military, law enforcement, engineering, or entrepreneurship. They may thrive in dynamic environments that require quick action and initiative.

Mercury (Budha)

Individuals with Mercury in the 10th house possess strong communication skills, analytical abilities, and a flair for intellectual pursuits. This placement can lead to success in fields such as writing, journalism, teaching, public speaking, or any profession that involves critical thinking and problem-solving.

Jupiter (Guru)

Jupiter's presence in the 10th house is considered auspicious for career growth and success. Those with this placement may excel in areas like education, law, finance, spirituality, or advisory roles. They may also find success in positions of authority and leadership

Venus (Shukra)

Those with Venus in the 10th house may find themselves drawn to careers in the arts, fashion, or beauty industries. They could excel in fields like modeling, music, or event planning, showcasing their creativity and aesthetic sense.

Saturn (Shani)

Saturn in the 10th house signifies a strong work ethic and a disciplined approach to career goals. Individuals with this placement may thrive in professions that demand patience and long-term planning, such as engineering, government roles, or business management.

Rahu or Ketu (North Node / South Node)

When Rahu or Ketu are positioned in the 10th house, individuals may face unexpected twists and turns in their professional journey. They might need to navigate through unconventional career paths and industries, adapting to challenges and changes along the way.

it can bring a sense of unpredictability and sudden changes in one's career path. Individuals with this placement may have unconventional career choices and may find themselves drawn to unique or innovative fields. Rahu in the 10th house can indicate a strong desire for recognition, fame, and success, leading individuals towards careers in media, entertainment, technology, or research. However, it can also bring challenges related to deception, illusion, and unexpected twists in one's professional life.

You may find success in careers that involve innovation, technology, and creativity. Suitable career paths may include:

Technology: Fields such as IT, software development, cybersecurity, and digital marketing where creativity and innovation are valued.

Media and Entertainment: Careers in film, television, advertising, social media, or content creation that require a flair for creativity and a desire for recognition.

Entrepreneurship: Starting a business in a cutting-edge industry or launching a startup that offers innovative solutions to existing problems.

Research and Exploration: Pursuing a career in scientific research, space exploration, or cutting-edge technologies that push the boundaries of knowledge.

Occult Sciences: Delving into astrology, metaphysics, or other mystical practices that tap into hidden knowledge and unconventional wisdom.

Ketu [South Node]

Spiritual Guidance: Becoming a spiritual leader, counselor, or teacher who helps others on their spiritual journey and inner growth.

Alternative Healing: Practicing holistic therapies, energy healing, or alternative medicine to promote physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being.

Meditation and Yoga: Teaching meditation, yoga, mindfulness practices, or leading retreats that focus on inner peace and self-discovery.

Charity and Nonprofit Work: Engaging in humanitarian efforts, social work, or volunteering for causes that align with one's values and principles.

Psychology and Counseling: Pursuing a career in psychology, therapy, or counseling to support individuals in their emotional healing and personal growth.

Overall, the placement of Rahu or Ketu in the 10th house can bring both opportunities and challenges in one's career journey. By embracing the unique qualities and lessons associated with these lunar nodes, individuals can navigate their professional paths with resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to explore uncharted territories in pursuit of their true calling.

Remember This is a General Analysis , Whole Chart is to be consider for Accurate Personalized Predictions.

For Paid Personalized Analysis & Reviews ➤ Check Here

Masterlist ➤ Check Here

#vedic astrology #career #jobs #astrology #astro notes #astro observations #astro community #astroworld #astroloji #astroblr #10th house

125 notes · View notes

darkmaga-retard · 11 days

Text

Imagine your search terms, key-strokes, private chats and photographs are being monitored every time they are sent. Millions of students across the country don’t have to imagine this deep surveillance of their most private communications: it’s a reality that comes with their school districts’ decision to install AI-powered monitoring software such as Gaggle and GoGuardian on students’ school-issued machines and accounts. As we demonstrated with our own Red Flag Machine, however, this software flags and blocks websites for spurious reasons and often disproportionately targets disadvantaged, minority and LGBTQ youth.

The companies making the software claim it’s all done for the sake of student safety: preventing self-harm, suicide, violence, and drug and alcohol abuse. While a noble goal, given that suicide is the second highest cause of death among American youth 10-14 years old, no comprehensive or independent studies have shown an increase in student safety linked to the usage of this software. Quite to the contrary: a recent comprehensive RAND research study shows that such AI monitoring software may cause more harm than good.

That study also found that how to respond to alerts is left to the discretion of the school districts themselves. Due to a lack of resources to deal with mental health, schools often refer these alerts to law enforcement officers who are not trained and ill-equipped to deal with youth mental crises. When police respond to youth who are having such episodes, the resulting encounters can lead to disastrous results. So why are schools still using the software–when a congressional investigation found a need for “federal action to protect students’ civil rights, safety, and privacy”? Why are they trading in their students’ privacy for a dubious-at-best marketing claim of safety?

2 notes · View notes

odinsblog · 1 year

Text

(source)

In June 2019, three Israeli computer engineers arrived at a New Jersey building used by the F.B.I. They unpacked dozens of computer servers, arranging them on tall racks in an isolated room. As they set up the equipment, the engineers made a series of calls to their bosses in Herzliya, a Tel Aviv suburb, at the headquarters for NSO Group, the world’s most notorious maker of spyware. Then, with their equipment in place, they began testing.

The F.B.I. had bought a version of Pegasus, NSO’s premier spying tool. For nearly a decade, the Israeli firm had been selling its surveillance software on a subscription basis to law-enforcement and intelligence agencies around the world, promising that it could do what no one else — not a private company, not even a state intelligence service — could do: consistently and reliably crack the encrypted communications of any iPhone or Android smartphone.

Since NSO had introduced Pegasus to the global market in 2011, it had helped Mexican authorities capture Joaquín Guzmán Loera, the drug lord known as El Chapo. European investigators have quietly used Pegasus to thwart terrorist plots, fight organized crime and, in one case, take down a global child-abuse ring, identifying dozens of suspects in more than 40 countries. In a broader sense, NSO’s products seemed to solve one of the biggest problems facing law-enforcement and intelligence agencies in the 21st century: that criminals and terrorists had better technology for encrypting their communications than investigators had to decrypt them. The criminal world had gone dark even as it was increasingly going global.

But by the time the company’s engineers walked through the door of the New Jersey facility in 2019, the many abuses of Pegasus had also been well documented. Mexico deployed the software not just against gangsters but also against journalists and political dissidents. The United Arab Emirates used the software to hack the phone of a civil rights activist whom the government threw in jail. Saudi Arabia used it against women’s rights activists and, according to a lawsuit filed by a Saudi dissident, to spy on communications with Jamal Khashoggi, a columnist for The Washington Post, whom Saudi operatives killed and dismembered in Istanbul in 2018.

(continue reading)

#politics #spyware #nso group #israel #pegasus #surveillance state #mass surveillance #privacy rights #cyber warfare

15 notes · View notes

zerosecurity · 3 months

Text

U.S. Government to Ban Kaspersky Antivirus Software Amid Cybersecurity Concerns

To bolster national cybersecurity, the Biden administration announced plans on Thursday to prohibit the sale of antivirus software produced by Russia's Kaspersky Lab in the United States. The decision comes as concerns mount over potential Russian exploitation of the software to gather sensitive information from American computers.

Commerce Secretary Highlights Cybersecurity Risks

During a briefing call with reporters, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasized the risks associated with Kaspersky's software. "Russia has demonstrated both the capability and intent to exploit Russian companies like Kaspersky to collect and weaponize Americans' personal information," Raimondo stated, underscoring the urgency of the action. The software's privileged access to computer systems could potentially enable the theft of sensitive data or the installation of malware, posing a significant threat to national security. This risk is particularly acute given Kaspersky's large U.S. customer base, which includes critical infrastructure providers and state and local governments.

New Regulations and Trade Restrictions

The comprehensive new rule, leveraging broad powers established during the Trump administration, will be implemented alongside the addition of three Kaspersky units to a trade restriction list. This dual approach aims to not only limit the software's presence in the U.S. market but also to impact the company's global reputation and overseas sales. Key points of the new regulations include: - A ban on inbound sales of Kaspersky software, including updates and licensing, effective September 29, 2024. - Prohibition of new U.S. business for Kaspersky 30 days after the announcement - Restrictions on white-labeled products incorporating Kaspersky technology. - Addition of two Russian and one UK-based Kaspersky units to the entity list, limiting their access to U.S. suppliers.

Implications for U.S. Cybersecurity Strategy

The ban on Kaspersky software reflects the Biden administration's broader strategy to mitigate the risks of Russian cyberattacks and maintain pressure on Moscow amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. It also demonstrates the government's willingness to utilize new authorities to restrict transactions between U.S. firms and technology companies from "foreign adversary" nations like Russia and China. Senator Mark Warner, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed support for the decision, stating, "We would never give an adversarial nation the keys to our networks or devices, so it's crazy to think that we would continue to allow Russian software with the deepest possible device access to be sold to Americans."

Kaspersky's History of Regulatory Scrutiny

This is not the first time Kaspersky has faced regulatory challenges in the United States. In 2017, the Department of Homeland Security banned Kaspersky's flagship antivirus product from federal networks, citing potential ties to Russian intelligence and concerns over Russian laws that could compel the company to assist intelligence agencies. Media reports at the time alleged Kaspersky's involvement in the transfer of hacking tools from a National Security Agency employee to the Russian government, though Kaspersky denied any intentional involvement.

Enforcement and Implications for Users

Under the new rules, sellers and resellers violating the restrictions will face fines from the Commerce Department, with the possibility of criminal charges for willful violations. While software users will not face legal penalties, they will be strongly encouraged to discontinue use of Kaspersky products.

Kaspersky's Global Presence and Response

Kaspersky, which operates through a British holding company and maintains operations in Massachusetts, reported revenue of $752 million in 2022 from over 220,000 corporate clients across approximately 200 countries. The company's client base includes prominent organizations such as Italian vehicle maker Piaggio, Volkswagen's retail division in Spain, and the Qatar Olympic Committee. As of the announcement, Kaspersky Lab and the Russian Embassy had not responded to requests for comment. The company has previously maintained that it is a privately managed entity without ties to the Russian government. As the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, the U.S. government's decision to ban Kaspersky software underscores the growing importance of securing digital infrastructure against potential foreign threats. The move is likely to have far-reaching implications for both the cybersecurity industry and international relations in the digital age. Read the full article

2 notes · View notes

zimshan · 4 months

Text

Corporate greed is outta control and antitrust action is the best reason to vote for Biden this fall.

It’s time to declare the debate over. In 2021, the total corporate profit increase was $730bn, or a little over $2,100 a person. That’s a large chunk of the inflationary increase in costs. Moreover, the price-fixing in the oil industry, which contributed roughly $200bn of that, isn’t an anomaly.

Take post-Covid rent hikes. One software and consulting pricing firm for landlords, RealPage, specialized in telling its clients to hike rents more than they otherwise might. As of December of 2020, RealPage had nearly 32,000 clients, including “10 largest multifamily property management companies in the United States”. There are multiple antitrust suits accusing the private equity-owned firm of organizing a massive price-fixing conspiracy to inflate rents across the board.

Beyond rent, the Biden administration or private plaintiffs now have credible antitrust claims against firms engaged in price-fixing in meat, hotels and large online sellers like Amazon. Corporations in a range of industries have made comments similar to those of Sheffield.

Alex Cisneros, an executive for Red Roof Inn, told a trade outlet that Red Roof Inn was using a software package called STR from CoStar to systematically hike prices across the hotel industry. “Red Roof’s franchisees for the most part are making more money with less occupancy,” Hotel News Now explained. “Red Roof is now providing more data to franchisees to educate and get them comfortable commanding higher rates.”

According to a lawsuit, an unnamed executive at Smithfield, a pork processor, summarized the advice he got from Agri Stats, a consulting firm that coordinates production in the industry, as: “Just raise your price.”

Rent, meat, oil and hotels are big sectors, so criminal activity in the form of price-fixing to boost profits should bust through the illusions economists have about how our markets really work. There are also a number of concrete steps policymakers can take to respond to this price-fixing.

The first is to arrest or sue the offending executives for criminal activity.

The second is to strengthen price-fixing and merger laws, allow more private class-action suits, force judges to speed up cases and increase the budget of antitrust enforcers to make collusion more difficult.

The third is to reform the Federal Reserve so policymakers there stop using macro-economic models that avoid considerations of profits and price-fixing.

And the fourth is, frankly, political. One key reason there is action on these schemes is because Biden has prioritized antitrust enforcement. He hasn’t put enough into antitrust, and he doesn’t talk about it very often. But he should, or else Americans are likely to fall into the trap of thinking that what is good for big business is good for their pocketbooks, when the opposite is so often the case.

#joe biden #greedflation #antitrust #corporate greed #break them up #a decade ago i said if i could sit done with anyone and question them for any hour about anything #itd be the foremost expert on antitrust laws and why theyre not working anymore #turns out its about enforcement #hes going after a ton of this in every industry and very wealthy people arent happy #why do you think the news never tells you what biden did today #2024 #politics

2 notes · View notes

crystalmethshop02 · 6 months

Text

Where to Buy Crystal Meth in Queensland

Crystal meth is a synthetic drug that comes in the form of crystalline rocks or bluish-white shards. It is typically smoked, snorted, or injected, producing an intense euphoric rush and increased energy. However, the effects of crystal meth are short-lived and often followed by a crash, leading users to seek more of the drug to maintain the high.

The Dangers of Crystal Meth

The use of crystal meth can have severe consequences for both individuals and society as a whole. Chronic use can lead to addiction, psychosis, cardiovascular problems, and damage to the brain. Additionally, the production and distribution of crystal meth contribute to crime and violence in communities.

Legal Status of Crystal Meth in Queensland

In Queensland, crystal meth is classified as a dangerous drug under the Drugs Misuse Act 1986. Possession, trafficking, and production of crystal meth are criminal offenses punishable by law. Law enforcement agencies are actively involved in combating the illicit drug trade, including crystal methamphetamine.

Risks of Buying Crystal Meth

Purchasing crystal meth in Queensland poses significant risks to both buyers and sellers. Law enforcement agencies conduct operations to target drug trafficking networks, leading to arrests and prosecutions. Furthermore, the quality and purity of crystal meth obtained from illicit sources are often unknown, increasing the likelihood of harmful effects on users' health.

Where to Buy Crystal Meth in Queensland

Despite the legal and health risks, individuals may still attempt to procure crystal meth in Queensland. Several avenues exist for obtaining the drug, including:

Online Sources

Some individuals may attempt to purchase crystal meth through online marketplaces or social media platforms. However, this method is risky and illegal, as law enforcement agencies monitor online activities related to drug trafficking.

Dark Web Markets

The dark web provides a platform for anonymous transactions, including the sale of illicit drugs like crystal meth. However, accessing these markets requires specialized software and presents significant legal and cybersecurity risks.

Street Dealers

Street-level drug dealers may also offer crystal meth for sale in Queensland's urban areas. However, purchasing drugs from street dealers exposes buyers to the dangers of violence, robbery, and arrest.

Risks and Considerations

Regardless of the method chosen, buying crystal meth in Queensland carries inherent risks. Individuals may face legal consequences, including fines, imprisonment, and criminal records. Moreover, the use of crystal meth poses serious health risks, including addiction, overdose, and long-term damage to physical and mental health.

Alternatives to Buying Crystal Meth

Instead of seeking out crystal meth, individuals struggling with substance abuse can explore alternative options for help and support. These include:

Seeking professional treatment for addiction through rehabilitation centers and counseling services.

Participating in support groups such as Narcotics Anonymous (NA) or SMART Recovery.

Utilizing harm reduction strategies to reduce the risks associated with drug use, such as needle exchange programs and overdose prevention education.

While the temptation to buy crystal meth in Queensland may exist, the risks far outweigh any perceived benefits. From legal consequences to severe health effects, the dangers of crystal methamphetamine use are profound. Instead of succumbing to the allure of illicit drugs, individuals are encouraged to seek help and support to overcome addiction and lead healthier lives.

Address: 1569 Ave, New York,NY 10028, USA

Contacts: Email: [email protected] Mobile: +1(818) 714-0948

Visit Here: https://crystalmethshop.com/

2 notes · View notes

mariacallous · 2 years

Text

The senator tasked with overseeing federal antitrust enforcement is urging the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate whether a Texas-based company’s price-setting software is undermining competition and pushing up rents.

Amy Klobuchar, the Minnesota Democrat who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust and Consumer Rights, sent a letter to the DOJ’s Antitrust Division this month. It was also signed by two other Democrats, Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.

“We are concerned that the use of this rate setting software essentially amounts to a cartel to artificially inflate rental rates in multifamily residential buildings,” the letter said. It encouraged the DOJ to “take appropriate action to protect renters and competition in the residential rental markets.”

In mid-October, a ProPublica investigation documented how real estate tech company RealPage’s price-setting software uses nearby competitors’ nonpublic rent data to feed an algorithm that suggests what landlords should charge for available apartments each day. Legal experts said the algorithm may be enabling violations of antitrust laws.

ProPublica detailed how RealPage’s User Group, a forum that includes landlords who adopt the company’s software, had grown to more than 1,000 members, who meet in private at an annual conference and take part in quarterly phone calls. The senators raised specific questions about the group, saying, “We are concerned about potential anticompetitive coordination taking place through the RealPage User Group.”

RealPage did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

RealPage has said that the company “uses aggregated market data from a variety of sources in a legally compliant manner” and that its software prioritizes a property’s own internal supply and demand dynamics over external factors such as competitors’ rents. The company has said its software helps reduce the risk of collusion that would occur if landlords relied on phone surveys of competitors to manually price their units.

The DOJ declined to comment on the letter.

The department five years ago reviewed RealPage’s plan to acquire its biggest competitor in pricing software, but federal prosecutors declined to seek to block the merger, which doubled the number of apartments RealPage was pricing.

The senators noted that transaction, saying RealPage has made more than 10 acquisitions since 2016. They said in data-intensive industries, “the ability to acquire more data can result in the algorithms suggesting higher prices and can also increase the barriers to entry” for other competitors. The lawmakers encouraged the department “to consider looking back at RealPage’s past behavior to determine whether any of it was anticompetitive.”

The letter follows two others sent by lawmakers urging the DOJ or Federal Trade Commission to investigate RealPage. Since ProPublica’s investigation was published, three lawsuits have been filed on behalf of renters alleging that the software is artificially inflating rents and facilitating collusion. RealPage has denied allegations in a lawsuit filed in San Diego, and it has not responded to calls for comment about the other two legal actions, filed in federal district court in Seattle.

30 notes · View notes

kenresearchreport · 11 months

Text

Decoding Cybersecurity: Unveiling the Future of US Digital Forensics Excellence

What is the Size of US Digital forensics Industry?

US Digital forensics Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of ~% between 2022-2028 and is expected to reach ~USD Mn by 2028.

Escalating cyberattacks targeting individuals, organizations, and critical infrastructure underscore the need for robust digital forensics capabilities. The increasing frequency and sophistication of these attacks drive the demand for advanced tools and expertise to investigate and respond effectively.

Rapid technological advancements, including IoT, cloud computing, AI, and blockchain, introduce new avenues for cyber threats. Digital forensics services are crucial to understanding these emerging technologies' vulnerabilities and mitigating associated risks.

Furthermore, stricter data protection regulations and compliance mandates necessitate thorough digital evidence collection, preservation, and analysis.

Organizations across industries has invested in digital forensics to ensure adherence to legal requirements and regulatory frameworks.

Additionally Legal proceedings increasingly rely on digital evidence. Law enforcement, legal firms, and corporations require robust digital forensics services to gather, analyze, and present evidence in a court of law, driving market expansion.

Us Digital Forensics Market By Type

The US Digital forensics market is segmented by Computer Forensics, Network Forensics, Mobile Device forensics and Cloud forensics. Based on type, Computer Forensics type segment is emerged as the dominant segment in US Digital forensics market in 2022.

Computers are ubiquitous in modern society, utilized across industries, organizations, and households. As a result, a significant portion of digital evidence related to cybercrimes and incidents is generated from computer systems, driving the demand for specialized computer forensics expertise. Computers and their software environments evolve rapidly.

Us Digital Forensics Market By End User Application

US Digital forensics market is segmented by Government and Defence, BFSI, Telecom and IT, Retail, Healthcare and Other Government and Defence market is dominant in end user application segment in Digital forensics market in 2022.

Government and defense agencies handle highly sensitive information related to national security and intelligence. The increasing sophistication of cyber threats targeting these entities necessitates robust digital forensics capabilities to investigate and respond to cyber incidents effectively.

Government and defense entities are prime targets for cyberattacks due to their critical roles. Effective incident response through digital forensics helps in containing and mitigating cyber incidents swiftly, minimizing damage and preventing further breaches.

US Digital forensics by Region

The US Digital forensics market is segmented by Region into North, East, West, South. In 2022, the dominance region is East region in US Digital forensics market.

The East region has a dense population and a well-established digital infrastructure, making it a hotspot for cybercriminal activity. The higher frequency of cyber threats and incidents necessitates a strong emphasis on digital forensics to investigate and mitigate these risks effectively. Additionally, the East region often sees a proactive approach from regulatory and legal bodies, reinforcing the demand for digital forensics services to ensure compliance and assist in investigations. The proximity of key players in law enforcement, government agencies, legal firms, and corporate headquarters further fuels the need for robust digital forensics capabilities.

Download a Sample Report of US digital forensics Solution Market

Competition Scenario in US Digital forensics Market

The US digital forensics market is characterized by a competitive landscape with several key players competing for market share. Prominent companies offering a range of digital forensics solutions and services contribute to the market's dynamism.

The competitive landscape also includes smaller, specialized firms and start-ups that focus on niche areas of digital forensics, such as cloud forensics, memory forensics, and industrial control systems forensics.

The competition is further intensified by the continuous evolution of technology, leading to the emergence of new players and innovative solutions. As the demand for digital forensics continues to grow, companies in this market are likely to invest in research and development to stay ahead of the curve, leading to a consistently competitive environment.

What is the Expected Future Outlook for the Overall US Digital forensics Market?

Download a Custom Report of US digital forensics market Growth

The US Digital forensics market was valued at USD ~Million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach USD ~ Million by the end of 2028, witnessing a CAGR of ~% during the forecast period 2022- 2028.

The US digital forensics market is poised for robust expansion due to the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, technological advancements, and regulatory pressures. Organizations across industries will increasingly recognize the necessity of investing in digital forensics to safeguard their digital assets and ensure compliance.

As long as cyber threats continue to evolve, the demand for sophisticated digital forensic tools, services, and expertise will remain on an upward trajectory.

The US digital forensics market appears promising, characterized by a confluence of technological advancements, increasing cyber threats, and growing legal and regulatory requirements. As technology continues to evolve rapidly, so does the nature of cybercrimes, creating a persistent demand for digital forensics solutions and services.

Additionally, the escalating frequency and complexity of cyberattacks. As more critical operations and personal information are digitized, the potential attack surface expands, leading to a higher likelihood of security breaches. This dynamic compels organizations and law enforcement agencies to enhance their digital forensic capabilities to investigate, mitigate, and prevent cyber incidents effectively.

Furthermore, the rise of emerging technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain presents both opportunities and challenges. These technologies bring new possibilities for efficiency and connectivity but also introduce novel avenues for cyber threats. Consequently, the demand for digital forensics services is expected to surge as organizations seek expertise in unraveling incidents involving these cutting-edge technologies.

The market is also likely to see increased adoption of cloud-based digital forensics solutions. As more data is stored and processed in the cloud, digital forensic providers will need to develop tools and methodologies to effectively gather evidence from virtual environments, remote servers, and distributed systems.

2 notes · View notes

kudzucataclysm · 2 years

Text

organizations in SE

major organizations/groups in SE

Crimson Head Lanes

The new start-up criminal gang led by the infamous retired supervillain Carmine Keller. A bowling alley (Crimson Head Lanes) acting as a legitimate business front, they mostly deal in arms/drug trafficking, black market fencing, contract killing, general mercenary work, and counterfeit goods and services. They are usually considered “the middle men” or “the handymen” when it comes to their relationships with the surrounding community and larger criminal organizations of Necropolis. They are usually employed by the Terranovas.

Fontaine Industries

The world’s leading developer of energy weaponry and combat mechas, created and led by famed superscientist billionaire Maya Fontaine. Connected to multiple crime organizations, most notably Crimson Head Lanes.

The League

A guild, a former workers union, and now a semi-underground mass network of criminal organizations run by a litany of supervillains. Primarily allowed to exist by world governments because the organization somewhat ‘controls’ the severity of chaos its members tend to cause; it's generally acknowledged that if the League didn’t exist, crime would be much more widespread, destructive, and rampant. Big influencer in global politics and the economy. Main attraction of the League is its benefits that provide free healthcare and protection from law enforcement as well as other criminals for employees. The League is under the thumb of four different crime families: the Terranovas, the Slaughters, the O’Hara’s, and Antumbra.

The Promethean Society 🜂

An international coalition made up of the brightest minds of the new century, united in one goal: to help guide humanity to a better future. In recent decades however, an ideological schism has split this powerhouse of intellectualism into two, and it's only through sheer political will that the society remains together as it is now. The two ideologies that have broken out in this schism are “Faucherism (Humanz Rule)” and “Ortonism (Everyone Just Fucking Chill)”. Maintains the public face of being a non-political entity but it’s most likely worse than even the League.

ATLAS 🜃

A secret arm of the Promethean Society who answers only to the founder, Lupe Altena. Goal is seemingly the cooperation and survival of both Martians and humans, but otherwise members are left to their own dealings.

UHC (United Heroes Coalition)

A global organization of ‘superheroes’ directed by and belonging to the UN, as well as the Companies.

Administration of Mars 🜜

The ‘governing’ body of Mars, made up of those who took part in the killing and eating of the former King Aldebaran. The now so-called "rulers" of planet Earth.

CHARON

A shadowy syndicate of the remnants of the old US government that work as an independent intelligence agency.

Order of Antumbra

A not-so-underground guild of highly trained assassins, hitmen, and cleaners available for hire.

The Terranova Family

One of Necropolis’ most powerful crime families and the backbone of the US East Coast black market. Regularly employs the CHL.

The Slaughter Family

The Terranova Family’s embittered rivals in close association with Antumbra.

The O’Hara Family

A major drug trafficking organization on the US East Coast, in association with Joy Softwares.

Necropolis Police Department

Police department for the whole of Necropolis. Massively overfunded and overarmed, yet manage to be absolutely incompetant by every definition of the word. Fascist and corrupt, employed by the UN.

The Zoo

The Prison City, meant for imprisoning criminal chimeras and superpowered mutants. No one knows where it is. Once you’re taken here, you never leave, and you’re never heard from again.

Kuiper Corporations (aka ORCUS)

A multinational entertainment, media, and, more recently, space industry and satellite telecommunications conglomerate. Think retro-modern SpaceX-Disney, controlled (mostly) by Martians.

MoonGate + Joy Softwares (aka HYDRA)

A recent corporate team up between MoonGate, a rocket company, and Joy Softwares, an entertainment and electronic company, aiming to rival Kuiper Corps’ domination of the market.

Pfaff Corp

A German-Japanese Americana-inspired multinational fast food corporation. Monopolized food and profit off of nostalgic 1950s American fanaticism.

Sanguine Pharmaceuticals

A (and quite possibly THE only) major multinational pharmaceutical company. Owns your blood (and everything that comes with it).

AMAD (All Martians/Mutants Are Die)

An online far-right, mostly American and East Asian, political extremism movement that calls for the expulsion and even death of all alien life forms, including human mutants that resulted from the presence of G.A.

Croeseid

A mostly non-profit organization dedicated to peace and cooperation between all Bloodstocks, primarily with assisting young chimeras who are at higher risk of causing societal havoc.

Early Bird - “We Get the Worm!”

A public sanitation company dedicated to cleaning up extraterrestrial and extra-dimensional biohazards. Recently they have gone under a huge militarization campaign and are now the go-to organization for chimera ‘disposal’.

#shattered earth #worldbuilding

8 notes · View notes

impossibledeanmakerwombat · 2 years

Text

Energy Portfolio Management Market In-Depth Analysis, Growth Strategies and Comprehensive Forecast to 2022 - 2032

In 2022, it is anticipated that the global market for energy portfolio management will be worth US$ 3,579 Million. The increased use of smart grid technology and smart metres is essential for raising market value. The entire demand for energy portfolio management is anticipated to reach around 11,569 Million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 12.4% between 2022 and 2032.

The worldwide energy portfolio the board market is supposed to be esteemed at US$ 3,579 Million out of 2022. The developing reception of savvy meters and shrewd framework assume an essential part in upgrading the market esteem. The general interest for energy portfolio the board is projected to develop at a CAGR of 12.4% somewhere in the range of 2022 and 2032, adding up to around 11,569 Million by 2032

Download Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-5537

Energy Portfolio Management Market: Drivers and Restraints Owing to increasing awareness about energy management, coupled with the company are focussing on gaining carbon credits, which is together anticipated to drive the demand for Energy Portfolio Management solution. Further owing to strict government regulation on limiting the wastage of energy and to promote efficient energy management is the drivers piloting the growth of the market, during the forecast period.

The need for reduce the excessive consumption of energy, energy management and monitoring are the two major factor, which are into consideration by government, with increasing demand for energy monitoring system at industrial and residential sector are crucial factors driving the growth of noise monitoring device market. However, the lack enforcement of proper law implementation in emerging economies are the major factor restraining the growth of the energy portfolio management market.

Competitive Landscape

What are the Leading Players in the Energy Portfolio Management Market Up to?

In January 2022, Power management company Eaton Corporation PLC��announced it has completed the acquisition of Royal Power Solutions, a U.S.-based manufacturer of high-precision electrical connectivity components used in an electric vehicle, energy management, industrial, and mobility markets. Under the terms of the agreement, Eaton paid $600 million for Royal Power Solutions, which represents approximately 13.6 times the company’s estimated 2022 EBITDA.

In November 2021, ABB Power Products & Systems India announced its rebranding as Hitachi Energy India Ltd. to accelerate the clean energy transition in India. Hitachi Energy, which has focused its purpose on ‘advancing a sustainable energy future for all, views India among its top five markets for expansion.

In June 2022, Siemens further expanded its portfolio in the field of innovative predictive maintenance and asset intelligence with the acquisition of Senseye. The global industrial analytics software company is headquartered in Southampton, UK.

Ask an Analyst @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/ask-question/rep-gb-5537

Key Companies Profiled

Eaton Corporation PLC

ABB Ltd.

Siemens AG

Schneider Electric

International Business Machines Corporation

C.A Technologies

SAP SE

Emerson Electric Co.

Honeywell International Inc.

Watchwire

Key Segments Covered In The Energy Portfolio Management Industry Analysis

Energy Portfolio Management Market by End User:

Residential

Industrial

Commercial

Energy Portfolio Management Market by Deployment:

Cloud

On-premises

Energy Portfolio Management Market by Region:

North America Energy Portfolio Management Market

Latin America Energy Portfolio Management Market

Europe Energy Portfolio Management Market

Asia Pacific Energy Portfolio Management Market

The Middle East & Africa Energy Portfolio Management Market

Request Methodology @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/request-report-methodology/rep-gb-5537

2 notes · View notes