#jk rowling misoginy
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
Fleur es mujerón. Odio como la tratan los libros y el torneo de los tres magos.
Es que Fleur es una tía chulísima y guapísima y sabemos que Rowling y su misoginia internalizada no pueden soportar a las chicas chulísimas y guapísimas porque le da un colapso de hígado cuando una se le planta delante sin pedir perdón por existir y prometer que será una gran esposa y madre para redimirse por haber osado tener belleza y carisma. Es algo que básicamente pasa con todas las mujeres de su saga que no son unas pick me o unas incubadoras con patas y dice mucho de lo resentida que está con su propio género, honestamente.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why I am wondering if she censored the name just because, well, it was herself answering to her own tweet?
JK Rowling loves misogyny. Loves it. She loves it. Every woman who says “I am a feminist, I am ridding the world of misogyny", and spends all day tweeting mean things at trans people. Or gets on trans people's profiles and just says the most horrible, cruel things... That's not how you end misogyny. So we can all see from your actions that you don't actually want misogyny to go away. JK Rowling uses the fact that misogyny is real, it does exists, to be the constant victim. And in her warped, awful morality, she thinks being a victim entitles her to victimize anyone that she wants to. That bullying is what TERFs are addicted to. And they will do anything about misogyny.
... VAVUSKA'S TWO CENTS ...
J. K. Rowling not only was a survivor of domestic violence and sexual assault, but also faced misogyny im publishing field: explaining why she wrote under her initials, J.K. Rowling revealed: "My publisher, who published Harry Potter, they said to me, we think this is a book that will appeal to boys and girls. And I said, oh, great. And they said, so could we use your initials?" The author went on to explain that the publishers were basically trying to "disguise" the fact that she was a woman simply because her book "might appeal" to all genders. But, as J.K. noted, that didn't last for long. "The book won an award and I got a big advance from America and I got a lot of publicity," she added. "So I was outed as a woman."
It was a clear blink to classical fantasy authors such as J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis.
Apparently, those publishers never heard of Ursula K. Le Guin, Tanith Lee, Marion Zimmer Bradley...
Jeffrey doesn't deny those facts: doesn't invalidate victims painful statements and their struggle to finally be able to talk about the real horror they had to pass through.
Jeffrey is NOT mansplaining misogyny, as well. They (Jeffrey's pronouns are they/them) are NOT explaining misogyny (to women) or invalidating JK Rowling testimony as survivor of domestic abuse and sexual assault. Jeffrey is speaking about how JK Rowling uses the fact that she was an actual victim of misogyny to stifle criticism and to avoid being held accountable for her “hate speech”.
In the same way H. P. Lovecraft fans uses the fact he was one of the founding parents of horror literature to avoid an honest discussion about his rampant racism.
As well Marion Zimmer Bradley heirs use her life as lesbian feminist scholar and writer to hide from the large public the fact she was involved in the cover-up of her husband's, convicted child abuser Walter Breen, sexual abuse of children and purposefully avoided investigating, questioning, or notifying any authorities. Multiple accuses of child sexual abuse were raise by their daughter Moira Greyland, who in 2014 went public about physical and sexual abuses her mother and Breen inflicted on her and other girls. Breen ended up with a conviction because of it, though Bradley got away unscathed at the time and died in 1999 without facing justice for her crimes.
Helding authors and artists accountable for their actions is important, because it will show that they are not immune to law and justice. It also would open a discussion about their crimes and NOT talking about what they did is a big insult to their victims and to all victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault and hate crimes.
Links here: X and X and X and X
Some literary reviews about racism and bigotry in fantasy:
Deeper Cut: Spirits of Bigotry Past & Present: H. P. Lovecraft & J. K. Rowling
Deeper Cut: The Two Masters: H. P. Lovecraft, J. R. R. Tolkien, & Racism in Fantasy
#vavuskapakage#jk rowling#transphobia#transphobes#twitter#trans rights#trans lives matter#no thanks#tiktok#misoginy#Misogyny#marion zimmer bradley#hp lovecraft#c. s. lewis#j. r. r. tolkien#j. k. rowling#h. p. lovecraft#cs lewis#jrr tolkien#tanith lee#ursula k. le guin#lgbtq+ community#support lgbt+#lgbtq+#anti jkr#anti jk rowling#fuck jkr#fuck jk rowling#fuck j.k rowling#i hate jk rowling
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
censura
Me vi en la penosa necesidad de eliminar mis redes sociales, pues estoy a punto de terminar un libro y pienso publicarlo más adelante.
Debido a que soy alguien que critica a los t-word y todo su movimiento misógino, homofóbico y lesbofóbico, mismo que empieza a ganar sorpresivamente apoyo hasta por debajo de las piedras, sabía que eso sería suficiente para que me quisieran funar/cancelar y truncar mi trabajo por simplemente no pensar como ellos y no aguantar sus delirios.
Es increíble hasta qué punto llegó la censura que me da miedo incluso antes de vivirlo.
La censura nos lleva a esto, a callar. No somos libres, seguimos siendo perseguidas y acosadas aquellas que nos negamos a dar nuestros espacios a los h/t-word.
Sé que pronto también deberé de cerrar esta cuenta o al menos borrar todo lo que pueda decir quién soy. Cambiar nombres o algo. Pero es en la única que todavía puedo expresarme.
Es lamentable y así es esto. Si quiero que mi trabajo sea bien recibido y leído, debo callarme y reírle un rato la gracia a los que juegan con nuestra opresión. Yo no tengo una fanbase que me respalde como a mi amada Joanne Rowling, yo debo empezar desde abajo, besándole los pies a los demás.
#censura#radfem#feminismo radical#dolor#pensamientos#libertad de expresión#no a la censura#escritora#libros#jk rowling#misoginia#misoginy
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Case of Robin Buckley: how to subvert the Mandatory Hetero Romance Plot (MHRP)
The beginning was clumsy, but the ending was fantastic.
Warning: spoilers/discussions over the ships in Stranger Things, Brokeback Mountain, 50 Shades of Grey, Harry Potter, MCU, Star Wars, Now You See Me, The Mummy, It, The Vampire Diaries, Mad Men, La Casa de Papel (Mind Heist).
My other metas here
La maldición de las cuatro brujas here
Una novela romántica de esas con un macizorro sin camiseta en la portada here
Buy me a ko-fi!
Do you know one of the concepts that angers me most? The “forced gay character” bullshit.
Excuse me? ARE. YOU. FUCKING. KIDDING. ME.
Tell me just one book, movie, show or videogame that DOESN’T show a hetero romance. Problems thinking in one? Of course. Because the MHRP is so pervasive that even in stories when your Main Character is gay, of course there will be a MHRP, sometimes even involving said gay character. Or to attract chicks, because women won’t read/see anything without romance (hahaha, the gender gap in Captain Marvel’s reviews says hello with her female/male friendship, the female/female friendship, and the cat).
Real poster advertising Brokeback Mountain. You know, the movie about two cowboys in love with their wives.
You know the dynamic: your Male Character sees her, the only Smurfette in the thing and by the end of everything, they are together. Like most horror movies, you endure the forced scenes of the love story, wanting to (finally) be done with it.
The plot is always the same: they see each other, the female make some acid remarks about the male (because we are in the XXI century and otherwise the male fantasy would be so much blatant) but they got together in the end. The Female Character Version of the MHRP written by a female writer is (slightly) better: at least your female character is pining for someone who is more interesting than the Smurfette (slightly again, and not always, but a jerk is more interesting than Generic White Dude). This is a direct consequence of two reasons: most writers are male (the ones who has good PR, at least), misoginy (against female writers and a ratio of 50% of characters of both sexes), homophobia (because gay is not nooormaaal and perverts our childreeeen), and the check points of “how to create a best-seller” (even those check points are proven to be incorrect and not useful to sell long time ago).
The forced necessity to introduce the MHRP
The MHRP always follow this steps, so it is easy to spot:
1. The Cool Girl Factor
The Smurfette is younger, cooler, hotter and funnier than your male hero. But she falls in love with him because… I really don’t know. Sometimes the guy is not even a nice guy.
Look. I understand why Anastasia Steele wanted to fuck Christian Grey. After all, he’s the better version of Mediocre White Guy Protagonist, and she doesn’t know anything better. But come on. Don’t fucking tell me Ramona Flowers and Knives would want to fuck Michael Cera. And stay with him.
Or a twenty something would want to fuck a grey haired man old enough to be her father, because mature men are the hottesttm. Dear writers, the only who says that are women who are also grey haired, stop trying to project how much you want to bang your daughter’s friends, I assure you as a woman and a former daughter friend, we don’t find you attractive at all.
No example included but this chart.
Or the idea of the younger, cooler, hotter and funnier female character who simply ends attracted to… no one. Seriously. If you don’t pair your younger, cooler, hotter and funnier female character with someone in the end, is not the end of the world.
Remember when JK Rowling said she paired Hermione with Ron because she wanted to subvert the dynamic of pairing the main female character with the male protagonist? This was a baby step in the right direction, but not the right question. The right question was not which whom she should be paired, if Harry, Ron or even Draco, but why she has to be paired at all?
Victor Krum Team btw, bitches. Despite the age gap.
2. The No Homo Message
Your male character has meaningful conversations with his best (male) friend? They spend a lot of screentime together? They have a preestablished relationship before what is happening in the story? The chemistry of both actors is terrific? Ok, let’s going to pair her with the Smurfette who just happens to appear conveniently for the plot.
In the MCU movies they had to stream storylines of thousands of comics in barely 2 hours per movie, so of course details would be deleted. Peggy Carter was The One for Steve Rogers. But time passed, Peggy died and now you have Captain America having a full saga of angst over Bucky Barnes. Okay, you don’t want to pair Cap with the Winter Soldier? Well, you can leave Steve alone and not make him kiss Peggy’s niece, who most of us are not able to remember her name and appeared for like 2 uneventful scenes before having a Big Damn Kiss with our Commited Virgin Hero.
Most blatant was the case with Black Widow. The actress had chemistry with almost everyone in the cast, and meaningful plots with almost everyone. Black Widow was the only Smurfette for a long time and was in a lot of franchises. There are real reasons to ship her with said Captain America, Tony Stark, Hawkeye… and she gets in the end with Hulk. Because reasons.
They broke up in Endgame and no one really cried.
Oscar Isaac was onboard with the StormPilot ship. Finn was meant to be with Rey at first (or at least be the False MHRP in the Reylo ship, depending on your view), but Poe appeared and started to stare Finn. The actor trolled Lucas Arts/Disney/China bootlickers execs so much that they added that ultra side character (the whatever smuggler from whatever planet) to be Poe’s ex. You don’t want to lose your conservative audience? Ok, money is money, but at least don’t pair your blatant queer coded character with extra #174. This is exactly what “forced” means.
She barely has a face, ffs.
3. You can erase the MHRP and the story and characters are the same.
Hell, even if you do that, maybe the story and characters would improve. You will have time to develop better the plot, or at least your audience won’t be scratching their heads asking why those two are together (or even worse, why she deal with his bullshit). The Big Bad kidnapped the Princess? Okay, your Mario will be more heroic if the just rescue the Princess because is a person, not because she is the girl he wants to fuck. Remember: sex<friendship/some random. Your character will be better if he or she improve by themselves, not because they want to impress the Designated Love Interest. I know, love and OTPs are very subjective, but even the most fluffy shippers recognize that context matters.
Remember Now You See Me saga? In the second, the girlfriend of the protagonist has to go because reasons (the actress was pregnant) and they added a new Smurfette. Who (at least) ended with the only other character not old enough to be his father.
Sassy redhead old love vs Darkhaired sassy new love. But still unnecessary. We came here for the magic!
The Mummy had Rachel Weisz as Evelyn Carnahan in nº1 and 2, but for the threequel, they recasted the actress. Like. WTF. If you cannot have Evelyn, then kill her. But this is was “disposable” means, because we all ready know Rick cannot be alone. Because reasons.
The Mummy 3 doesn’t exist. Like Batman’s 3rd gf in the Dark Knight saga.
Do you remember the guy from the right in Deadpool? Yep, he did everything in the plot for his fridge dead wife and child. Do you remember the names of said women? Of course not. The writers didn’t even bother to give them a name!
This was the magic of Stelena. In The Vampire Diaries, Elena was the reincarnation (or something) of the lost love of Stefan. Stefan was new, mysterious and charming. They got together before the reveal of “I am a vampire”. Where is the magic then? They admitted they just were horny for each other, like most teens (I have the theory of vampires maintain the maturity of the age in which they were killed), and roll with it. They kissed and all that jazz and later became friends and reliable partners. Like a lot people do in real life. First bang, then partners. But admit you were in for the sexy times like Stelena did, damnit.
4. The time and timing
You can’t have a story that lasts less than a week and have said pairing declaring love forever. Shakespeare already parodied this in Romeo and Juliet that was… you know. A parody. You can’t have a demon possessing your house/zombie apocalypse/mafia war/meteor coming and having your pair invested in bang each other. Is just not the time. If you do that is just ridiculous.
I get why Kylo Ren would be rooting by Rey. After all, she resisted him, her actress is Daisy Riley, and he has abandonment issues. But why she rooted for him? I mean, just more abandonment issues (after all she adopted a robot) is not enough to feel taht much pity and sympathy to the point of “hey, this is The One”. From her POV, the guy tried to kill her (several times) in around seven hours, killed father substitute Han Solo, is a Nazi Emperor, when they meet they fight to death and the only redemption he had was help her to fight Zombie Palpatine. That’s not enough. Even if somehow they manage to survive both, I suppose Kylo would be in some martial court and send to prison forever for all the things he did. And most of us distance (and years) kill a relationship. The writers even invented the resurrection power of the Force to pull off Reylo. I know that “consistency” is not a word in Star Wars world, and both characters are the superpowered versions of their sides, but come on. I don’t even get why Kylo Ren would want Rey as his student. There are more people around... and he has a fucking army, he doesn’t really need her. Seems an unnecessary complicated evil plan to me.
It can happen but not like it finally happened.
The ending would have been better if they did a Rogue One: you saw the MHRP coming, but the movie ended before the protagonists could start something. And these protagonists were young conventional attractive people, who didn’t try to kill each other when they are together. Just for your information.
But hey, the MHRP was so forced in the Star Wars saga that we had Padmé losing her pants for a stalker whose pick up lines were about sand, and two 1st grade siblings kissing each other, so…
It doesn’t matter how hot John Hamm is, I seriously doubt there would those parade of women in the 60s ready to bang Don Draper. Specially during the times with the rampant misogyny and slutshaming, NS the almost inexistent birth control and legal abortion. Also, I doubt the sexually liberated hippies would fuck the Supreme Yuppie.
Of course, you can have a non Stockholm Syndrome love story during a robbery that last less than a week.
5. Actors’ chemistry
Rule number one: if you have actors, make them work with the chemistry as much as they can. Or write the things more smoothly. Just don’t give them the “romantic” interactions to other pairings.
There is a reason why the Jonsa shippers increased exponentially in the 2-3 seasons Jon and Sansa Stark were “together”, even with people who didn’t ship them before fell for them. And people who shipped Jonerys rolled their eyes to the back of their skulls when Jonerys occurred (and some of them jumped the ship). Kindly reminder this people of the gif above are brother/sister (well, cousins).
Hell, I thought Billy in his first scene was going to pull a Love Square with the Unresolved Sexual Tension between Teen Team (StevexNancyxJonathan), or force something on Nancy that will solve the UST finally, or start the dynamic NancyxBad Boy (even if wasn’t canon but you know how viewers are) and instead of that… you have the Sex Walking Machine shirtless and sweating grinding Steve in a basketball practice. Twice. And later in a shower. Writers, I know that shippers will ship what they want, and will take any hint, but try to don’t fuel the ship machine so caressly. I don’t want to know what would have happened if you put them in the coffee shop AU or the “and there was only one bed!” scenes. FFS, the scene above ended in Pornhub in the “Jock obliterating twink” category.
6. The dark side of the Smurfette: the Love Triangle
This is the usual ratio of male vs female in everything:
1 male, 1 female
2 males, 1 female
3-4 male, 1 female
4-5 male, 2 females (one of them usually is a sibling, but fucking your siblings is allowed since Game of Thrones became mainstream).
And so on. One of the deleted scenes of It was the gang bang (obviously), but yet we have Beverly, launcher of ships. At least here we have some more gay ships, and I’m not talking about the canon Reddie.
This is when we have with the MHRP2, the cancer version of the MHRP. Same everything, but even more forced, because you want the main female character to kill the other 2 males, to bang her best female friend instead, or have the male ones banging each other and dumping the female.
The Stranger Things Case
Stranger Things is not immune to this. We have Mileven. Mike chose her because she is the Smurfette. She chose Mike because reasons, because even in season 1, we can agree Dustin is an awesome scene stealer, Will is gay a cinnamon roll, Lucas is black in the 80s. So basically the writers make her chose the Generic White Guy (his name is fucking Mike even) instead of Anything That Can Subvert Expectations. Nancy had the Teen Love Triangle, and you knew since the beginning Joyce and Hopper will be something.
The MRHP was even more forced in season 2. Max arrived as (another) Love Triangle and to be the 6th ranger of the Party (see the ratio above). Because apparently, you cannot introduce a female character without being a love interest. Even if said character would be getting along with our protagonists anyway, because they share nerdy interests and she is also a misfit. Max could have been the Zoomer without the MRHP2 . The writers even forced Max in another Love Triangle with Mileven (combo, 2 MRHP with one character, where are my points?) with Eleven being jealous of her relationship with Mike. Not the Party, only with Max. Kali didn’t count since she didn’t interact with any main character or plot.
In season 3, we were introduced to Erica (sibling and still too young to have any action) and all the Love Triangles were finally resolved (except for the forced drama of Joyce ignoring Hopper for a second to stay with Mr Clarke).
Enter Robin, the MHRP for Steve. She has been working with Steve, who is at its peak of loser and also, single. She is a loser but a cool, smart, snarky one. She was supposed to exist in Hawkins since some time before, but conveniently was erased from existence by King Steve. She tried to help Steve to get girls, she mocked his Mom Status, and… that’s it. Then, she helped to enroll Erica in Scoops Troop, she resolved the Russian code, they break in, they get tortured, and they set the Mind Flayer on fire. I just listed all their scenes together during 8 hours of screentime, in the 5 days around the season 3 plot happened. And we were supposed to ship them because both are young, hot, white, and they shared 2 snarky scenes and later, a crazy plot about Evil Russianstm.
At least Suzie was a plot device, part of the “growing up” theme of the season, a Chekhov Gun and gave us an iconic scene.
But luckily for us, Joe Keery and Maya Hawke are millenials so hetero is not granted, they read their chemistry onscreen, Maya is a woman so she has already dealt with being the sexy lamp before disappear from lead roles because she will turn 35, they understand about writing, and how the tumor plot that is MHRP existed and convinced the writers midseason to stop the MHRP to happen (again). And instead of said MHRP, we received a beautiful (and meaningful) friendship in the show about friendship, and an organic and realistic coming out scene.
Thank, actors. We need more Joes and Mayas in the world. Or, at least, less MHRP. And this goes for you too, fellow writers and creators who are reading this.
How to troll your audience by subverting their expectations: Black Sails aka “Welcome to the Bi Island of fuck gender roles”, and also “this guy was dicked so hard and well that declared a war on England because of the death of his boyfriend”.
#writing#escritura#robin buckley#mrhp#romance#it#harry potter#mcu#the vampire diaries#twilight#now you see me#scott pilgrim#brokeback mountain#stranger things#stelena#crepusculo#ramona flowers#stormpilot#star wars#reylo#evelyn carnahan#the mummy#la momia#steve harrington#jonsa#game of thrones#juego de tronos#la casa de papel#money heist#captain america
92 notes
·
View notes
Text
im honestly shocked of the amount of feminist ig I followed that defend JK Rowling as if she was a feminist leader lol, I can’t believe I used to follow this amount of terfs. They even deleted my comments when I explained why transactivism is not misoginy
1 note
·
View note
Text
cis straight women need to understand that their experience and struggles with sexism or misoginy (that are valid ofc) can’t be compared to the experiences of wlw/straight trans women, especially because cis straight women too often ARE the enablers of transmisoginy (see: jk rowling’s disgusting ass)
As a lesbian i will always relate more to trans women than cishet women. Made to feel disgusting and predatory in women's spaces? Check. Berated and mocked for our relation to sexuality and womanhood? Check. Hated for our "deviancy from the norm"? Check. Every single essay about womanhood by a trans woman--and especially, especially by trans wlw--has spoken more to me than anything written by a cis straight woman ever could. T*rfs can take that to the bank.
148K notes
·
View notes
Note
cho and dean thomas are overhated because hinny is endgame
viktor and lavender are overhated because romione is endgame
tonks is overhated because wolfstar is more popular
snape is overhated because jily is endgame
and that shows a lot about the fandom. let people have their ships :( i ship some of these hated ships and it’s basically a crime; most of their arguments are “cho was a crybaby!” she was mourning her dead boyfriend who was so nice and literally did nothing to deserve that?? “lavender was obsessed” she was in love?? “18 and 14-15 is literally pedophilia!!!!1!!! i hope somebody grooms you!” WHAT?
basically, my rant was all about the fact you can’t like pairings of characters most don’t like.
Imagine validating an idea as horrible and problematic as a 15/16 year old girl who just lost her boyfriend being annoying because she cries in the midst of a terrible grieving process and post-traumatic stress. Imagine narratively complimenting another girl because that girl doesn't cry. Imagine you're JK Rowling and you say you're a feminist but all the teenage girls who behave like teenage girls in your books get a ton of criticism and bashing and you only treat positively those who fit within feminine standards or conform to men's fantasies. It's just fucking disgusting. I mean Lavender is a gossipy and normal teenage girl who likes basic teenage things and clearly she has to be an annoying creep because she likes Ron, because of course Ron is for Hermione who has more important things to do with her life like reading books and being the best in class. Because clearly, you can't be intelligent and hardworking and at the same time frivolous and feminine if you're a woman in Rowling's eyes; you have to be one or the other.
You also can't be a vulnerable teenager with emotions you can't control, or be in mourning, or be unable to know what you want after a traumatic event, or prefer to cover up for your best friend over whatever political shit you're stirring up, you have to be a tough chick who only has guy friends and who doesn't cry because big girls don't cry and who instead of solving things civilly casts spells violently and who has outbursts of a real rude bitch like Ginny, because that's what a real girl is, that's a cool girl that boys like, a girl who's not like the others, a warrior girl. In Rowling's world you can't have ovaries and feelings at the same time, it's impossible, it doesn't happen.
Y sí me encanta cómo olvidan convenientemente que Hermione es un año mayor que Ron y Harry, con lo que en el 4to libro tiene 15/16, no 14/15. Y cómo el hecho de que se lleve con Krum 2/3 años les parece fatal pero luego Fleur y Bill que se llevan 8 años y ella apenas tiene 18 cuando se conocen y Remus y Tonks que se llevan 13 y ella tiene como 22 o 23 cuando se conocen está todo bien o sea???
En fin que me da igual y que paso muchísimo, la misoginia que hay en esa saga y el tratamiento tan pobre de los personajes femeninos y cómo Rowling reduce a todas las mujeres que no se adaptan a las fantasías del male gaze o a la idea de las madres santas ultra sacrificadas a mujeres malas, inválidas o menos aceptables es para vomitar. En serio es que se podría hacer toda una tésis de lo mucho que esa señora odia a las mujeres en general y solo soporta a los estereotipos creados para que los hombres se hagan pajas en particular.
#jk rowling#jk rowling mysoginic#misoginy in media#misoginy in books#female in media#female in books#female in literature#feminism#feminism critic#hermione greanger#ron weasley#lavender brown#cho chang#harry potter#ginny weasley#viktor krum
21 notes
·
View notes