#jeanne du barry movie

[my-deer-friend]

Jeanne du Barry: A review

I watched it, so you don’t have to!

There was a preview screening of Jeanne du Barry that coincided with a presentation on 18th century fashion and hygiene, so I figured that would make for a pleasant Sunday. The lecture by Marta Veil was splendid.

The movie was… not.

I wasn't expecting greatness, really, but I also wasn't expecting it to fail in quite so many ways. Shall we count them?

First, it falls flat as a piece of cinema. The ponderous shots just scream second-year-film-student-auteur. The narration, usually a gimmick, is critical because the directorial vision seems to have been “tell, don’t show”. It’s all glamour with no heart, a faux-profound fashion parade that fails to let its consequential story beats resonate on any emotional or narrative level. Despite being told about the constant danger than Jeanne is in, we never feel it. Despite witnessing her tragedies, we don't empathise.

The lead actor-director gives du Barry none of the wit, charm or depth you would expect of the subject of a biography, and most characters are either outrageous caricatures (the evil, Alice in Wonderlandian step-daughters, complete with heart-shaped perms) or have the nuance and magnetism of an untoasted slice of white bread (the Dauphin, a key side character, shows not a single discernible character trait besides “aloof”).

Second, it fails as a biography. Maïwenn, the woman responsible for this mess, has apparently been trying to bring this story to life for over a decade - and then manages to give us nothing more than the blow-for-blow you can get from the du Barry Wikipedia article - dryness and all.

(It’s also exceedingly clear that Maïwenn got more than a little 'inspired’ by Sofia Coppola’s Marie Antoinette, and ironically - given their historical rivalry and the way Coppola's Antoinette was lifted wholesale from her film - the Dauphine outshines du Barry completely here.)

Despite being a biography, the movie devotes very little attention to Jeanne’s coming of age - and almost no time (literally, a 30-second narration) to the 12+ years of her life after Louis’ death, which include such dramatic things as her being betrayed by her servants, tried and executed in the wake of the French Revolution. Very little of her internal world is explored - so we don’t really understand what drives her, and even when she expresses her goals it comes across as insincere.

The bulk of the movie focuses on Jeanne’s time as Louis XV’s lover. That’s understandable, I guess - people want the sexy, sparkly intrigues, not the convent drudgery - but the movie doesn’t do any work to embrace the politics and scandal surrounding her on more than the meanest surface level. I mean - "this is Versailles!" (A line that’s cribbed verbatim from Coppola.) Where are the machinations, the manoeuvres? The only meaningful drama we get is domestic. Louis’ daughters don’t like his mistress. They’re mean to her. And… that’s it.

Most egregiously, the movie makes the unrecoverable error of losing grasp of its own point of view. We ostensibly follow Jeanne for most of the movie, in what is made out to be a limited first-person perspective. But when she’s banished from Versailles, we get to witness the unfolding events without her. After all, the death of Louis XV is surely more interesting than some woman bundled off to a convent (wait— who is this movie about…?) and so we stay with him - and miss the opportunity to follow Jeanne and empathise with her isolation, fear and grief.

If the goal of the movie was to humanise and rehabilitate du Barry, then maybe she shouldn’t have been made so vapid, boring and lacking in agency that her own biography lost interest in her.

Third, it fails as a historical piece. Not entirely - some of the men’s fashions are sumptuous and on point, Marie Antoinette is chef’s-kiss, and Versailles looks splendid on screen - but that makes the rest worse, somehow.

Again, we get Coppola plagiarism, in the form of Louis’ morning dressing routine (with the same comical play on the endless steps and bored attendants), as well as in many of du Barry’s fish-out-of-water moments.

But the movie forgets its own rules and context. For example, we’re told that “no one except the Dauphin is allowed to turn their back on the king” - a rule that’s respected until about midway in the movie, at which point, its plot purpose exhaused, it's forgotten entirely. Jeanne is also surprisingly enlightened about racial equality, showcased in painful scenes with Zamor, her black… servant? slave? Although it’s not really clarified on screen, the former is heavily implied, which would be gross revisionism.

Even Louis is treated with a strange sort of familiarity, left to mill around with his guests in the hall of mirrors or stroll the gardens with his hair undone.

As for the clothing… I can’t bear to deep-dive into the entirety of the mess, but here are a few examples of just how lazy the styling is.

Now, when he’s done up in his finery, Louis XV actually looks grand - and even (what a rarity) has very decent period men’s make-up. But then it’s clowns all the way down. Take this shot.

Just behind him is his daughter, sporting a top-of-the-pops 1980s crimped blowout, and beside her is the Dauphin of France - though you could be mistaken for thinking he’s some fella getting to pose for a romance novel cover in the world's most ill-fitting suit. (I don’t recall this man tying his hair up one single time for the duration of the movie.)

Some of the critique is a little nitpicky, yes - for example, du Barry wears this outfit to be formally presented to the king:

The big hair and ostrich feathers are a decade too early (stop trying to be Marie Antoinette: The Unauthorised Prequel already), the makeup is mid 2000s, and the necklace... the less said about it, the better. But at least an attempt was made!

But this?

And this???

0.5 out of 5 stars. It would have been zero on account of all the plagiarism, but a half-star is given for the cameo of Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun.

[freshmoviequotes]

Jeanne du Barry (2023)

[filmesbrazil]

[depp-1963]

Johnny Depp as King Louis XV in Jeanne du Barry

[bebx]

Johnny Depp as King Louis XV and Maïwenn as Madamn du Barry in their upcoming film ‘Jeanne Du Barry’

[yasaman2003]

Our legend looks great as always ❤👌👏

[the-marquis]

Maïwenn Le Besco as Jeanne du Barry

Jeanne du Barry 2023.

[flippityflaps]

the god returns, i'm so excited to see him once again on screen💗

[mascati-nucis]

Benjamin Lavernhe and Maïwenn

in JEANNE DU BARRY, 2023

[fierce-little-miana]

Not to be hater on main but in the new movie about Mme du Barry (Jeanne du Barry), the director in addition of casting D*pp in the main lead role, casted herself as du Barry.

Maïwenn (the director) is 47 years old. Jeanne du Barry was 25 when she became Louis XV’s mistress (he was 58 so at least casting D*pp is age appropriate). Born in 1743, she was younger than the youngest legitimate child of Louis XV (and he had 10 of them!). Jeanne du Barry was 31 by the end of their liaison, when Louis XV died at 64.

But I guess keeping the 30 years age gap would not have looked as good as trying to make historical figures more palatable.

[havithreatendub4]

New #JeanneDuBarry #trailer #scene #Jeanne Du Barry #King Louis XV #movie stills

#gif

[freshmoviequotes]

Jeanne du Barry (2023)

[filmesbrazil]

[nerdwonderland-1993]

Jeanne du Barry-La favorita del Re,al contrario del film precedente mi ha stupito e devo dire che l'ho adorato!Sono andata a vederlo principalmente per Johnny e ne sono uscita innamorata dell'interpretazione di Maïwenn. Mi ha fatto ridere,mi ha fatto arrabbiare,mi ha fatto emozionare e ho provato una forte empatia per Jeanne. Vi consiglio di vederlo. Voi lo avete fatto? Cosa ne pensate?

[lisystrata]

Jeanne du Barry - 2023

Today I watched "Jeanne du Barry" about the Rococo era - the times of Louis XV. At one time, Ludovic was played in film adaptations by John Barrymore and Jean Marais. Now it was Johnny Depp.

What can I say… quite a sad sight. It's not just about the casting of actors, which led to the fact that only Depp looked the most adequate to the historical prototype.

Now it has become almost bad manners to discuss the appearance of actors, although, it would seem, what could be more important for such a visual field of art as cinema? But no, here the requirements have gone down to the “school theater” mark. I won't risk talking about it so as not to have been "canceled" if, due to my poor command of the English language, I inadvertently blurt out something that is unacceptable by the standards of political correctness. But, damn it, why not add more suspense into the plot? Wasn't it possible to add more action, add multi-storey and logical intrigues, with which the courtiers of Versailles so amused themselves from idleness? What I saw is characterized by one epithet: despondency. And even the great Depp does not pull the plot out of the quagmire. It's impossible to get it out of there. And if we add to this an inappropriate, exaggerated caricature (daughters of Louis, for example), then we get an even more sad spectacle. In general, of course, it cannot be said that the film is categorically bad. But I can't even call it good.

I apologize for grammatical, syntactical, stylistic and punctuation errors.

[bebx]

Johnny Depp as King Louis XV in his upcoming movie, Jeanne du Barry

He literally comes back as a king