#its just factually incorrect
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
3liza · 1 year ago
Text
only about 20% of donations to thrift shops are sold in retail locations. The remaining majority of used clothes are handled in numerous ways, including being exported to lower-income countries and landfilled. This contributes to environmental harm. This number is even higher when we consider the fact that large numbers of low-quality or damaged items are discarded at the first sorting.
[...]
What happens to secondhand clothes that don’t sell? Estimates from the United States show that only about 20% of textile donations are sold through thrift shops, while the remaining 80% are sold to resellers [editor's Note: by "reseller" this article is not referring to Depop sellers the top post is referring to, they mean commercial resellers], sorters, and graders, repurposed into low-quality textile materials for stuffing or rags, and sent for disposal. 45% of this remaining amount is domestically and internationally reused and resold, 50% is used for low-grade textile needs, and 5% is landfilled or incinerated. The fiber-to-fiber recycling only amounts to about 1% of this amount. (NIST, 2022, Facilitating a Circular Economy for Textiles Workshop Report) . Almost half of all second-hand clothing donations that don’t sell are exported to different countries. While African countries receive the majority of low-quality items, Latin America receives the medium-quality pieces, and the high-quality, branded items are exported to Japan which has a rich second-hand clothing market. (Hansen, 2010) . It is estimated that between 40-75% of textile donations that don’t sell are resold in bulk to textile sorters, graders, and brokers by charitable donations like thrift shops. These textile recyclers across the United States and Northwestern Europe transport their bulk second-hand textile purchases to warehouses and sorting plants, where the textiles are sorted according to different properties like fiber content, weight, quality, fabric type, and garment type. This intensive sorting labor is often done by underpaid immigrant workers in poor working conditions. (Hansen, 2010) . According to Southern California Goodwill’s vice president of retail operations Ray Tellez, Goodwill locations across the Southern Californian region track how long each piece is displayed for sale in the retail locations and the pieces that aren’t sold in 4 weeks are sent to Goodwill outlet stores. These outlet stores usually sell items for lower prices and per weight (i.e. 99 cents per pound of clothing) in an effort to keep donated and second-hand textiles out of landfills. While there are regional differences in how Goodwills across North America handle this process, this general outline of the process is the same in different regions. (Strutner, 2021) (Goodwill Outlet Store Locator) . According to Brittany Dickinson, who is the manager of sustainability for Goodwill Industries International, only half of all donated clothing is suitable for sale to retail customers through online or offline stores. The remaining half of donations are either sold to Goodwill outlets or to salvage dealers. Of the 50% that’s approved for sale to retail customers, only 38-48% of pieces are sold within the approved time frame. The rest is first sent to Goodwill outlets and later sold in bulk to salvage dealers. (Chiu, 2023) . Buffalo Exchange, which is another popular thrift store in North America, purchases second-hand clothes from their owners rather than accepting donations. For pieces that aren’t in a good enough condition to be bought by Buffalo Exchange and resold, they collect donations for local non-profits. The second-hand pieces that do not get sold in their regular retail locations are sent to their outlet stores in Texas and Arizona. (Porter, 2019)
there is so much unsold clothing from the secondhand market in the United States that we have collapsed the textile industries of several other countries by exporting unsold thrift store donations to the global south. there is no shortage of second hand clothing and never will be. resellers could not possibly buy enough donated clothing from thrift stores to ever make a dent in the global supply even if their market segment (which is borderline nonexistent) was double the size it is now. ask anyone who has actually worked at a Goodwill or Value Village about this, they'll tell you the vast majority of donated clothing goes straight to outlets/landfill/exports, and the majority of the remaining clothing that actually ends up on racks sits there until its time expires and it ends up at the outlet/export/landfill. there is no conspiracy of Etsy resellers taking all the good clothes away from you. it's an entirely invented moral panic from TikTok and I don't think the people I see posting about it ever actually shop secondhand, and if they do they've never been to a Goodwill outlet where they sell (yes, even plus size) clothing shoes and textiles for a dollar a POUND.
Becky who buys one XL sun dress a month to flip on depop couldn't budge the global export market if she got venture capital backing for it. it's just too big, and Americans buy and donate too many new clothes, for individuals to do anything about it in either direction.
thrift store resellers are like if landlords were egirls
32K notes · View notes
dreadfuldevotee · 7 days ago
Text
crazy to me how people tag and comment anecdotes about Anne Rice with "they could never make me hate you". Honey, we dont hate her because she eccentric, we hate her because she's addicted to characterizing the global south as Noble Savages
264 notes · View notes
dukeofthomas · 4 months ago
Text
I can't find it now but there's a post about suspension of disbelief and how it's broken when the story starts trying to excuse it. "character gets knocked unconscious for hours but there's no further issues from this" okay 👍 "and actually this makes perfect sense because of this and that" um no it doesn't why are you lying to me. like i am willing to ignore the holes and the discrepancies!! all you need to do is let me and not bring unnecessary attention to it!!!
and all that is my issue with the whole robin child soldier argument. like i am willing to ignore it i am willing to engage with the fantasy literally all you need to do is NOT try to convince me that Actually It's Fine Because They Want To Do It or whatever. like literally just shut up about it and i can engage with the fantasy!!
#my dc posting#dc#robin#batman#like. if you want to tell a story and not worry abt the child endangerement thing just DONT BRING IT UP ???#all you're doing when you bring it up is telling me this is something i'm allowed to think abt when it comes to the story#and then you tell me Um Actually It's Fine ?? no! what the fuck are you talking about!!#i am tryinggggg to just have fun n read fics your lil “isnt that child endangerement and kinda fucked up?” “no actually they wouldve done i#anyways bla bla bla batman couldnt have stopped them bla bla bla''#is COUNTERPRODUCTIVEEE#dick grayson#jason todd#tim drake#damian wayne#<- tagging the robins sorry#sorry this just. this topic annoys me so much#...also ''batman couldnt have stopped them/they wouldve done it with or without him'' are literally#just factually incorrect in jason's case. he did not in fact start on his own and the only thing batman wouldve#needed to do to stop him is literally just NOT make him robin BUT- at this point im just beating a dead horse on that topic#w how many times i bring it up lmao#like. in real life you cant just knock a person unconscious for hours with no consequences on them.#but i dont care when it happens in fiction despite being not realistic!! bc its fiction!!!#unless of course the characters out of nowhere do a lil sidequest PSA abt how actually doing that is fine#and completely safe with no risks#yknow??#like if that happened id be annoyed and like no its fucking not fine why are you trying to convince me. just move on and dont bring it up#and I wont bring it up#anyway. yeah these are just some thoughts im having rn sorry its not more coherent and put-together i cant be assed rn lmao
112 notes · View notes
freakinator · 12 days ago
Text
sorry if im what youd call "unbased" but heres some tags i wanted to add to the second latest confession on tge confessions blog lol
Tumblr media
like yeah lifesteals changed thats undeniable like for example the lsers arent trying to constantly one up each other with gimmicks anymore but i think some ppl would just be happier watching the vids rather than the streams like the pvp anon and this anon
11 notes · View notes
everlarkyuri · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
theres a poster of “women heros” in my ap world history class and i spotted katniss everdeen… that drawing is not my katniss everdeen dawg she is not pale like that😭 and the description is pretty ill fitting? It doesnt give justice as to why katniss was actually a hero… her volunteering was a selfless act and yes heroic, but she did start a revolution for the oppressed and took down two tyrants at 17 years old…. Maybe we should talk about that and not celebrate the fact that she participated in the killing of 22 kids when the whole point of the trilogy is that being a victor is NOT heroic😭
17 notes · View notes
thescreaminghat · 1 year ago
Text
anton fellner is such a weird little freak (affectionate). he's conventionally attractive and a platinum blonde so he could probably get away with anything if he really tried. he could probably have just worked a regular post in reinhard's new regime after making any excuse to transfer out from being obie's assistant. but the moment he gets in proximity to the aforementioned Older Man with Problems he's suddenly like "wow my new boss is such a gremlin. he's got the most flexible moral fibre this side of the universe---besides myself--- and he's probably also fucking insane. i want to observe him like i'm an entomologist tenderly dissecting a new species of bug. maybe i'll even kill him" (he doesn't). and then he just spends the next several years being emotionally invested in the drama caused by obie's various hypocrisies. he's so special to me
16 notes · View notes
tears-of-boredom · 10 months ago
Text
DecolonizePalestine -FAQ:
There is a common misconception, that in order to be objective you need to be neutral. These concepts can be connected but they do not necessarily follow from each other. Having two points of view does not automatically mean that both points of view are equally legitimate or based in reality, or that the truth has to be located somewhere in the middle. For example, you can of course bring two opposing sides to discuss if climate change is real or not, but treating them both as equally valid and of equal worth when one is backed by scientific consensus and the other isn’t is not a fair and balanced representation of reality. It is a false equation of two sides simply for being two different sides. This actually gives legitimacy to reactionary and anti-scientific positions. Similarly, Israeli colonialism and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians is an objective fact. Maintaining a neutral position on this war crime is not only immoral, but enables Israel to commit further heinous acts in the future.
12 notes · View notes
match-your-steps · 2 months ago
Text
just read a review of the lego movie from 2014 and it is genuinely a horrible piece of literature and through perusing the comments underneath the review, I have gained an intense dislike of the reviewer. it's not even that I liked the lego movie and he didn't it's just that a lot of the stuff he says is factually incorrect, really stupid-sounding, or he doesn't provide any real reason, and in the comments, he reacts to even the friendliest and politest constructive criticism as if it's a personal attack on him.
#listen I DON'T CARE THAT YOU DIDN'T LIKE THE MOVIE#I mean I'm slightly saddened because I did like it#but he straight-up says it's fully actual physical stop-motion animation at the beginning (factually incorrect)#then later says you won't appreciate the movie unless you like lego a lot and know all about it#specifically saying 'if you can tell the Lego Wild West town from its pirate ship from its spaceman set' (direct quote)#like um idk bro... are you saying you can't???#also this does insinuate that there is one specific set for each of these#which is also factually incorrect but I'm not really mad about that#and then in the comments he kept trying to defend himself by saying stuff about how the movie has a 90%ish rating on rotten tomatoes#and therefore 10% of people didn't like the movie#which is actually. an insane oversimplification of statistics. that's like saying if there are 10 children with an average of 4.5 apples#per child and each child can have a maximum of 5 apples#then 9 of the children must have 5 apples and the other 1 must have none#the 90% in fact includes a large number of people who rated it at 3.5-4.5 stars which is means a lot of them really actually did like it#and just didn't think it was the best movie ever ever in existence or maybe they just had some small qualm with it#the final straw was that someone left a very nice very kindly written piece of constructive criticism asking if maybe the reviewer would#consider saying what about the humor he didn't like (or what kind of humor it was) next time so that the viewer would know whether they#would like it or not as well and I read this and thought 'surely he will respond courteously to at least this one' and he said.#basically 'it's not that the kind of humor didn't suit my tastes. it just wasn't funny'#WHAT THE FREAK#WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT#ALL THIS GOING ON AND ON ABOUT WRITING A NEGATIVE REVIEW BECAUSE IT'S YOUR ACTUAL OPINION AND NOT BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO BE CONTRARY#BUT I THINK YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT AN OPINION IS??????#it's MY opinion that it was funny#it's YOUR opinion that it wasn't#you don't get to arbitrarily say that the only reason you disliked the humor was because it was 'bad'#even ethics aren't this black and white#there was another thread where a commenter pointed out that the reviewer seemed to assume there was such a thing as a universal definition#of a good movie and he repeatedly refused to explain himself. like in an 'are you stupid. this isn't worth my time' way#but I won't get into that
2 notes · View notes
0809sysblings · 1 year ago
Text
i think the most trivial, stupid thing i get irked (and i use this word in the LIGHTEST way possible, please understand) by when i see it is the "Mikoto calls himself a fashion designer when he tucks his shirt into his sweatpants" joke.
and i dont care when it comes to the making fun of him aspect. please by all means make fun of this man! i support bullying (affectionate) him.
the thing that "irks" me is... they arent even sweatpants!!!! theyre not sweatpants, you must believe me. i have a pair of pants Very similar to his (only differences being it has an extra set of pockets and its greener in color), and they are not sweatpants. i know, they look like them (sorta...). its mostly the drawstring part. but, and i do not know Why, it has become a bit of a trend in the recent years to give more pants that drawstring style of waist. so if anything the fact that he's wearing pants like that just gives him being a fashion designer more merit.
thank you for watching this episode of Jokebusters. proudly sponsored by Autism Spectrum Disorder
14 notes · View notes
iliveinprocrasti-nationn · 1 year ago
Text
“fiction by its nature cannot contain inaccuracies, only anachronisms” wrong. lie in the ground and bake bagels
10 notes · View notes
babybabymerrychristmas · 9 months ago
Text
it does NOT surprise me that there are SO MANY tabloid movies coming out being labelled as "documentaries" filled with "friend of a friend of a friend" claims or like heavily, heavily, heavily biased with a clear narrative the filmmaker wanted to push from the beginning that tells only one possible explanation of the truth.
usually if a documentary is trying really, really, really, really hard to make you think a certain way, it's a propaganda piece. you shouldn't have to force feed your audience the "right" opinion to take away from the film evidence. you should present the full story as accurately as possible with real historical evidence to back up the storyline and the audience will walk away with the right idea.
documentaries should not have an overly persuasive tone to them because you should be able to follow the facts to get to the right answer yourself. if you find yourself walking away from a documentary feeling nothing but "wow this proves exactly what i suspected to be true why arent more people angry about niche radicalizing viewpoint that most people find to be inaccurate" you should recognize that as the first step to being indoctrinated into extremist behaviors and thoughts.
#if someone starts telling me about how much they love watching documentaries and its all super emotional hit pieces on bad celebrities#im like BIG yikes and i stay clear from them emotionally like no fucking thank you#i am a snob about documentaries sorry and i have no idea if im right in my thinking i just think this is how it should be imo#yall should walk away from a documentary understanding how someone can come to the wrong conclusion about something#because the documentary should always present the opposing view point in as sympathetic light as possible#steel man the argument then use facts to demolize it#if a documentary about a controversial or political issue#documentaries that lie manipulate rely on emotional support rather thana factual support are bad imo#because it often radicalizes people to the wrong side once they find the steal man argument against ur position#there is a reason people believe certain things#for example my terfs are lying about the original definition of woman argument post#in it i accept the possibility that woman could be defined this way only if u insist on denying factual history#i explicitly state woman was a white female child because it forces well meaning terfs to investigate the truth of my claim#and it forces them to confront the fact that their argument against trans women can be applied to people they think are in fact real women#you have to be willing to engage with repulsive ideas to show why they're factually incorrect.#im not saying the tone has to be completely passive but you have to be FACTUAL with your documentaries.#i am genuinely of the opinion that the facts will convince anyone because all people just want to be right at the end of the day.
3 notes · View notes
florentium · 10 months ago
Text
Trying to keep my history thoughts on the matter to myself online so that I don't get turbo cancelled but I just have to point out that there is a huge difference between THE British Museum and A British museum.
For Christ's sake.
2 notes · View notes
bitegore · 10 months ago
Text
HUH. i think i just got, like attempted-converted but i did not notice LMFAO
6 notes · View notes
grellestie · 2 years ago
Text
people who think grelle would harm kids on purpose are cringe send tweet
20 notes · View notes
kurokoros · 1 year ago
Text
.
I'm not a patriotic person by any means, but there's no one more insufferable than a european or australian that shit talks america constantly. "your health care sucks" we know. "your education system sucks" we know. "blah blah blah insensitive jab about school shootings"
does that make you feel good, you insufferable, snobby little bitch?
3 notes · View notes
makerofmadness · 2 years ago
Text
I use Safari and I'm not gonna change that
me and my 500 tabs are happy
5 notes · View notes