#irrelevant personal rambling
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
fallowhearth · 11 months ago
Text
I had lunch with a friend today even though I really didn't want to (nothing against the person, just tired). Since I got home I've been lying on the couch becoming increasingly melancholy because I'm equally bored and unable to rouse myself to do anything. Strange to feel like I'm having to hold off friends who want to see me (and are making it very clear!) because I'm so exhausted, but also to feel so lonely.
3 notes · View notes
aingeal98 · 26 days ago
Text
More Jason and Cass thoughts (sorry but also not sorry) but if I was magically given full control over DC and could write what I'd want obviously I'd make Cass Batman but I've been thinking of what sort of reaction and role Jason would have in response. I think I'd write his version of "Congrats on the new job!" as a test, involving the Joker and civilians and gangs and Red Hood and a ton of explosives. Bruce failed me, and now he's given up. You're his successor, let's see how you handle this dilemma that freaked him out so badly he threw a batarang into my throat rather than let me avenge my own death in front of him.
So obviously Cass will overcome the traps and the puzzles. That's the fun part to show how competent both of them are and sprinkle in little character moments as we go. But then we reach the emotional crux of the matter, probably laid out as some sort of saw trap because it's Jason. Here I am, a victim of murder. You say nobody dies tonight but I did, and I want the man who did it dead. Not only did Batman fail to avenge me but he failed to stop the Joker from going on to create even more victims. What right do you have to stop me from getting justice for myself? What right does this man have to life after what he's taken from me and from countless others? I'm not trying to kill a random stranger, I'm specifically demanding justice for my own death that I never got while I was gone.
There are two ways this could go. The straightforward route if I knew my time on this run was limited would probably be a pyrrhic victory like the ones Cass's og series was so fond of. Just like Bruce in utrh, she acts on instinct and saves the Joker (and Jason this time) . A win technically, but she fails the test. Jason is once again vindicated but with nothing to show for it. The story ends with Cass sending the Joker back to jail and going back to the batcave, where the old Robin costume looms judgementally, highlighting her failure. It would be the most fitting end given their character molds, all tragedy and conviction and unstoppable force meets immovable object etc.
However... I think the option I prefer would be a little different. Cass levelling with Jason, a killer talking to a murder victim. She has no right to stop Jason from getting justice, she has no love for the Joker but she knows any death she allows to happen like this would devastate her, just like that death row inmate long ago she tried to break out but ended up letting go once the family of the victim talked to her and demanded justice. I think... In this specific situation, she'd just be honest. Morally she has no right sure. Personally she just really really doesn't want anyone to die. Give her one chance, please. Let her try it her way. Not demanding, not lecturing or insisting, just... Please. Don't do this. Let me try another way.
And then what? Jason asks.
In the end a deal is struck. Cass will take the Joker and lock him up, ensuring he never harms anyone again while also trying to rehabilitate him. But the second she fails and he gets free, Jason kills him and she won't stand in his way. It's the kind of deal that leaves both of them mildly disgusted and dissatisfied with themselves, neither of them naturally creatures of compromise when it comes to this specific topic. But Cass is willing to do anything to avoid death and Jason did not expect the new Bat to be so... Flexible? Kind of? Of course maybe she won't actually hold up her end of the deal and when the Joker gets loose she'll try and stop Jason from killing him and he'll get his miserable vindication, but right now this is something strange and new and he's mildly confused and curious about where it will go. He doesn't believe in her ability to contain the Joker forever but he's willing to let her try because her reaction to that future failure interests him. She's given him a sword of damocles to hang above her head and he didn't ask for it or expect it. It's the type of power he never thought the Bat would just... Hand to him.
The conflict ends with neither of them fully winning or losing. They both don't really know what to feel about this.
The thing is, the second Cass let's Jason kill the Joker she's hanging up the mantle. She's staking the Bat on this, because it's always go big or go home with her when it comes to saving others, even someone like the Joker. In this magical universe where I have unlimited power, Cass would lock the Joker in a secret bunker and have Leslie Thompkins talk to him daily, mostly because I think her pacifism speeches and debates in the comics would make a fun contrast to the Joker's evil sadism. (But what about his rights? Doesn't he deserve a trial and to be held in a regular prison? I'm going to be honest I think Cass would be very comfortable bending the rules on this specific situation. Morally questionable but I'd have fun with it. She's going to let Leslie treat Joker like her personal pet project to save his soul because yes she wants him to change but also she's got a city to save every night so go crazy Leslie, have fun.)
And the Batman series would continue with Cass as the lead, new challenges and new antagonists and every twenty issues or so for the first hundred we'll cut back to the Joker briefly if his chats with Leslie can help highlight some thematic element of the current arc. But bit by bit he'd slowly fade away onto oblivion, maybe getting referenced every hundred issues or so until eventually no one remembers or cares about him because there's so much else going on. Meanwhile Jason's got a good thing going as Red Hood, primarily based in Park Row and a tentative ally on the occasion when their vigilante work aligns. Unlike Joker he's a much more frequent character in the comics, and after say 10 years (this is my magical fantasy universe Cass's batman run is going to last for a very long time alright) when people think of DC characters they think of Red Hood long before they think of the Joker.
Is any of this realistic? Right now of course not. It's why I'd go with the pyrrhic victory if I actually got the chance, because it would be the best way to tell the story in the larger context of the Bat narrative. But it's my fantasy DC editor and writer daydream and I'm going to dream big. They're never going to be normal happy siblings, their personal demons will never fully let them be free and the looming possibility of losing everything they currently have narrative wise if Bruce comes back as Batman will always be there. But it's maybe the closest to peace they'll ever get. Unsatisfying and tame compromise that probably violates several laws and ethical codes but whatever. Cass has never read the Geneva convention and Jason's not going to shed tears over the Joker. Let him die relevancy wise if not physically.
#dc#cassandra cain#batfam#dc rambles#Jason Todd#In terms of the larger meta narrative ultimately whether the Joker dies or gets locked up is irrelevant#But Cass will never be willing to just let someone die without trying to the very end to make her case for their life#And I think it's entirely possible Jason would reject her proposal and we're back to square one#But I think the two main reasons to me that he'd accept is one. Cass betting her career on this. She doesn't need to do that.#She could save the Joker and fail Jason's personal test and that would be that. Her actually reaching out#Being willing to risk something precious just to try and compromise with Jason. It would be more than he expected#From a family that he understandably believes he does not matter enough to#And secondly is the long term consequence of the Joker fading into irrelevancy while Jason maintains his prominence as a character#A reverse of his death where he was turned into nothing but a footnote and a memorial for Batman angst#While the Joker went on to gain even more narrative power as Batman's Greatest Enemy#Now he is nothing. And Jason is alive and a solid part of the mythos#It would take time obviously but ultimately from a Doylist sense to me it's the most satisfying resolution#Maybe after like 10 years Cass can die again briefly the Joker gets out and Jason gets to kill him to give Maps some fun Robin angst#But ultimately it's very important to me that if Cass becomes batman the Joker must become irrelevant#He's just not useful enough thematically to be worth his current narrative weight when she's running the show
385 notes · View notes
mollysunder · 1 month ago
Text
One of the best examples of Piltover’s lack of genuine self-reflection is when Jayce decided to make hextech weapons for Caitlyn. I understand that he nay have been rattled by Renni's attack during the memorial, but the only reason Renni even had the place stormed was because Jayce killed her son... with a hextech weapon! Renni literally told Jayce to his face this isn't some random act of violence, this is about revenge for her child that he shot and left to die on a cold factory floor.
And instead of internalizing the series of events that caused this specific situation, which was an act of retaliation against Jayce's own aggression. Instead he just made more weapons for Caitlyn and her team, as if that wasn't the reason things escalated in the first place. Jayce may have been remorseful for killing that kid, but any feelings he had about it were largely irrelevant to how it informed his actions later on.
167 notes · View notes
heilos · 6 months ago
Text
I have come to the annoying conclusion that many search engines are becoming super useless in trying to track down historical research without bending over backwards for answers. The amount of garbage that shows up in the results is so incredibly aggravating and has nothing to do with my search terms or questions. I cannot in fact "just use X search engines" apparently.
241 notes · View notes
sebek-zigbolt · 10 months ago
Text
I don't think I'm strong enough not to pull for bday sebek even tho I want to save for ch 7 cards...... bcause yea........
10 notes · View notes
angelicsentinel · 5 months ago
Text
Not to yuck anyone's yum here, but I don't see how someone can do meta if they don't even have basic reading comprehension, much less do surface level critical analysis that says anything of substance.
4 notes · View notes
lazaruspiss · 11 months ago
Text
seeing content creator drama is so weird. like i would die. also people who try so hard for internet fame? like ur trying to get big on purpose?? thats literally one of my worst fears and i will never understand social media culture.
4 notes · View notes
jettreno · 2 years ago
Text
I assume it’s bc of the tv show but I’ve seen a couple posts randomly dunking on the last of us but for such dumb reasons. “I want to play lighthearted silly games instead of grimdark ones” “I want to play games that are more inextricable from the video game medium, games that are less cinematic” the good news is that those games exist! the last of us is in fact only two games out of the countless video games out there, so I would recommend not playing them if you don’t want to
#rambles#it’s an irritating example of ‘i don’t like this popular thing so it must be everyone and everything else that’s wrong’#like. it’s so funny I saw a post complaining that games are too dark bc of druckmann’s standard but like#they literally listed other big studio games in the post as counter examples#as like ‘studios SHOULD be making games like THESE’#but clearly….they are#so like. what’s the point here?#also possiblyhighly controversial opinion but i like the tlou gameplay#it can get boring when it’s like ‘pick up and move these planks’#but they rectified that in the second game#but like. what im saying is that just bc tlou is cinematic doesn’t mean it’s bad at being a game#it’s not trying to copy a film - otherwise it would have been a film to begin with#it’s particularly well suited to the screen and i am personally very excited for the tv show#but the tv show doesn’t render the game irrelevant#the experience of playing the game is excellent#honestly my hope is that the show will open the door for more people to examine viddy games and take them seriously#which would then ideally lead more people to appreciate the more unique and game-specific games out there that CANT fit the screen#uhhh what else. oh yeah - tlou also DOES take advantage of the game medium?#just in subtle and admittedly occasional ways#a standout is in part2 when the game won’t move forward until u as the player make ellie torture nora#now i have BIG issues with this scene but it’s for the (no pun intended) execution rather than the concept#basically if it were almost any other character than nora in this scene it would work better#BUT - that emotional turmoil and devastation and guilt and pain from pressing x and hurting someone until they give you what you want?#that’s not possible in any other medium#anyway hehe oops this is a long rant 🤪#my point is if u don’t like tlou then don’t worry u don’t have to play it 💕
53 notes · View notes
welcometogrouchland · 2 years ago
Text
What if I proposed the analysis that Belos actually has very little internal moral compass and that his veneer of righteousness has always been implied by the writers to be complete fabricated bullshit even before watching and dreaming basically confirms it.
#ramblings of a lunatic#^shes going in drafts untagged bc a) philip stans who insist on the morally misguided angle terrify me in their persistence#and b) i would have to actually rewatch episodes and whatnot#but i think i can build credence to the idea that him and caleb started off not invested in witch hunting for moral righteousness#but numb to it via cultural normalisation and THUS. had an amoral approach to the whole thing#and the only thing either of them as orphan outsiders ever really would've gained from witch hunting would've been careers and recognition#a sense that they're heroes- not in the moral sense but in the narrative sense. that they were protagonists#The Most Important Boys so to speak#the difference being Caleb at some point decided witch hunting was wrong (i.e like hunter did. grew a moral compass)#and philip still navigated the world amorally 400 years later only motivated by a petty grudge and deep buried guilt#the latter of which is nearly irrelevant to anyone who isn't philip bc clearly he priorities that grudge above it#this is just a personal petty opinion#but i honestly don't think the 'delusional and petty' angle is any less complex than the 'moral crusader' angle w/ his character#and it matches the whole 'hes a magic conservative' message way better than his motives being genuine#one day I'll rewatch that scene in WaD and see if Philip fans are onto something and I've been drinking the pond water#or if it's actually congruent with his character like I've since come to see it and like i know many saw it the first time round#anyway this is actually all for me. in drafts you go#edit: hi. it's the ladel of like. 3 weeks after i made this and put it in drafts. it's nearly 1 am rn and- in my delirium-#i have decided to publish it#i doubt it'll do much w/ regards to response bc fandom has been on the quiet side lately (tho that can always change(#plus I made a similar post insinuating the same notion and it got ZERO traction positive or negative#which tells me I'm good to just say shit for the most part (in a good natured way)#anyway. hits post cutely (i am so fucking tired)
13 notes · View notes
averlym · 1 year ago
Note
Wait so I’m kind of confused, are you still doing asks? Or just commissions since you’ve officially closed ur requests. Are you just gonna occasionally do asks with requests no longer being sent?
hi hi!! okay so:
1. commissions are open right now
2. requests are 'closed' - i can't stop you from sending them, but it's pretty unlikely that i'll draw them any time soon
3. i have quite a lot of old requests filling my ask box, so i'll do those asks occasionally
hope that clarifies a bit!
6 notes · View notes
villagewarlock · 1 year ago
Text
existing as a gender and being perceived is so weird..
been using the "women's only room" at the gym cause it's a much smaller space with way less people than the two main spaces and I am so very new and unsure of what I'm doing and having the fewest number of people watch me fumble through figuring out how machines work is ideal but also all of the other people in this space are Very femme like long hair and sports bras and workout leggings etc and there's me with chin hair and jeans and a tshirt. maybe I am overthinking and the other people there don't give a shit but I don't want to make people uncomfortable in a space that I think technically I should not be using? but also I have realized that I am still deeply tied to having been raised/socialized as a girl and assume that people read me as butch lesbian(?). but I think at this point that does not match the way that I look to other people and I like how masc I look and don't really want to change that so... idk??
2 notes · View notes
fallowhearth · 10 months ago
Text
I posted a few weeks ago about having an order of operations problem in my weekend housework. Anyway, I'm happy to report I've solved it through the simple solution of just doing everything Saturday morning rather than dragging my feet and putting off the annoying tasks until Sunday. Turns out it wasn't that hard to do. Many such cases.
I feel like this post should have some kind of lesson or joke or something to make it a worthy Post but no, it's just a diary entry. Also many such cases on this blog!
4 notes · View notes
caruliaa · 2 years ago
Text
theyre not roman and virgil from sander sides btw theyre virgil and roman from good at loving you || prinxiety animatic. if you even care
6 notes · View notes
mollysunder · 21 days ago
Text
The fact that Jinx killed Silco, or that he was specifically killed at all, is so irrelevant to s2 (for everyone including Sevika) is so weird to me. If I never watched Arcane and randomly started from s2, or if some marathon came on and I made it to the start of s2, I wouldn't even remember that Jinx killed him.
To be fair, Jinx did straight up tell Smeech and they included Silco's death in that awkward black and white clip show recap of silco in s1, but it's just so completely inconsequential to the plot. Actually, it's also a bit confusing because despite knowing Silco's dead, Caitlyn still lists one of her objectives as neutralizing "agents still loyal to Silco". Do these supposed loyal "agents" even know he's dead? Do they know Jinx killed him? Why didn't Caitlyn mention any of this to the general public?
Tldr: In s2 it's easy to forget that Jinx killed Silco because it doesn't matter to anyone, not her allies or enemies. If I was a casual viewer, like I watched it s1 during the premiere and came back post-hiatus to watch s2 without a rewatch and you quizzed about how Silco died, I'd probably get that answer wrong.
105 notes · View notes
oh-meow-swirls · 2 years ago
Text
i wrote a potential prologue for my rewrite of 2 months ago but it doesn't actually work thinking about it so here it is in screenshot form-
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
gynoidgearhead · 11 months ago
Text
[image caption: two books, one very thick and one very thin. the first is "the plot of mass effect 1" and the second is "the plot of mass effect 1 if the n7 armour had a helmetcam". end caption]
Tumblr media
my mass effect hot take ((fuck the council))
#i literally started a rpg campaign with the premise that basically the council actually believed shepard at the end of me1#and the alliance somehow discovered the crucible plans and started building it right away instead of much later in 2195#and shepard showed up at the alpha relay not to destroy it but to fire the now completed crucible at all the reapers arriving#(somehow they cut the catalyst out of the loop idk. probably because all the reapers were there in one place & it was simpler)#and then the premise of the campaign was ''okay now you have a galaxy full of people who still don't trust each other''#''they didn't have their unifying trauma and they never learned to cooperate as a result of it. there is factionalism and shit.''#shepard was basically backed into a corner by being made the human councillor & was a non player character#that game ended up falling apart because someone in my group tried to basically pothole the game into being about murdering salarians#(they were playing a member of a headcanon secret krogan clan that basically kind of made the other krogan irrelevant/redundant?)#(like there were so many things in the setting they effectively had to break in order to make these plot beats work)#(incl like. the entire narrative complexity of the rest of the krogan)#and it just got fucking exhausting to fight them on every single thing (which is what they basically demanded)#this person also systematically demolished my mental health and my confidence in my ability to be competent at anything though#by making me extremely dependent on them while claiming they wanted to help me become independent#and leveraging their psych degree to be ableist as fuck to me#so like. i'm probably saltier than i should be about their creative contributions. idk i'm not gonna feel bad for it though#op and prev i'm sorry about the ramble in the tags#mass effect#personal
3K notes · View notes