#ios marketing

[navdurga32]

What are the best websites for buying app reviews and ratings for iOS apps?

In today’s highly competitive app ecosystem, getting visibility for your iOS app is more challenging than ever. Positive reviews and high ratings are essential to stand out in the crowded App Store, as they not only attract potential users but also improve your app’s ranking in the store's algorithm. This leads to increased organic traffic, improved download rates, and enhanced credibility. For developers and marketers looking to boost their app's reputation, buying app reviews and ratings has become a popular strategy.

While there are many platforms that promise app reviews and ratings, it's essential to select reliable and trustworthy sites to avoid potential pitfalls, such as fake reviews that could harm your app's reputation. Below, we explore some of the best websites for buying iOS app reviews and ratings and explain why ElanceMarket stands out as one of the top choices.

1. ElanceMarket

ElanceMarket has earned a reputation as one of the best platforms for buying app reviews and ratings for iOS apps. Known for its focus on delivering high-quality services tailored to the app development community, ElanceMarket offers a range of app marketing solutions that include genuine, organic reviews, and ratings from real users. Here’s why ElanceMarket is a top choice:

Authentic Reviews: ElanceMarket ensures that the reviews and ratings are not just random or fake accounts, but come from real iOS users. This authenticity helps maintain the integrity of your app, protecting it from potential penalties or removal from the App Store.

Targeted Demographics: One of the unique features of ElanceMarket is its ability to target specific demographics. If your app is designed for a particular audience, ElanceMarket can ensure that reviews come from users who match your target profile, thus increasing the relevance and appeal of your app.

Customized Review Strategies: ElanceMarket doesn’t just provide generic reviews; they work with you to craft personalized reviews that highlight the strengths of your app, enhancing its appeal and reliability. This level of customization makes it easier to align reviews with the user experience your app offers.

Safe and Secure: ElanceMarket ensures that all its activities comply with Apple’s guidelines, keeping your app safe from being flagged or penalized for using questionable promotional techniques. Their approach emphasizes organic, natural growth, which protects your app from future risks.

Comprehensive App Marketing Services: In addition to reviews and ratings, ElanceMarket provides a range of marketing services to enhance your app’s visibility and performance in the App Store. These include ASO (App Store Optimization), keyword installs, and app promotion strategies, making it a one-stop solution for app marketers.

2. AppSally

AppSally is another popular platform for purchasing iOS app reviews and ratings. They offer a range of marketing services specifically designed to boost app performance in the App Store. With AppSally, you can choose between various packages depending on your needs and budget. The company claims to deliver reviews from real users to ensure authenticity and reliability. AppSally also offers flexibility, allowing app developers to tailor review content according to their preferences, ensuring that feedback aligns with the app’s strengths.

However, one of the downsides of AppSally is the lack of targeted demographic options. While reviews may be genuine, they may not always come from users who represent your app’s target audience. This can reduce the impact of the reviews, especially if your app caters to a specific niche.

3. BuyAppReviews

BuyAppReviews is a platform dedicated to providing both Android and iOS reviews. It allows app developers to purchase reviews that can help boost their app’s ranking and credibility in the App Store. BuyAppReviews promises reviews from real users and ensures compliance with Apple’s guidelines, reducing the risk of penalties. The platform offers various packages, depending on the number of reviews and ratings you need, making it suitable for both small developers and large companies.

However, some users have reported delays in review delivery, and there is limited control over the content of the reviews. This lack of customization could be a drawback for developers who want more personalized feedback.

4. AppReviewSubmit

AppReviewSubmit offers comprehensive marketing solutions for iOS and Android apps, including app reviews, keyword optimization, and ASO services. They promise real and organic reviews from genuine users, which can help boost your app's visibility in the App Store. With competitive pricing, AppReviewSubmit is often a go-to platform for developers on a budget.

That said, AppReviewSubmit may not offer as much customization or targeting options as some of the other platforms on this list. While the reviews are real, they may not be as relevant to your app's target audience, potentially limiting their effectiveness.

5. ReviewLancer

ReviewLancer is another platform where developers can buy reviews for iOS apps. The platform emphasizes providing reviews from real users and focuses on delivering high-quality, positive reviews to enhance your app's reputation. One of the standout features of ReviewLancer is its ability to create customized review content based on your app’s specific features and user experience.

However, like many other platforms, ReviewLancer lacks targeted demographic options, which may not provide the best results for niche apps. Also, there have been some reports of reviews being delayed, which could hinder timely promotional efforts.

Why ElanceMarket Stands Out?

ElanceMarket’s success in the app marketing space stems from its ability to deliver high-quality reviews while maintaining strict compliance with Apple’s guidelines. Here’s why ElanceMarket stands out as one of the best platforms for buying iOS app reviews and ratings:

1. Unparalleled Quality Control

At ElanceMarket, quality control is a top priority. Unlike some other platforms where the source of reviews may be questionable, ElanceMarket thoroughly vets the accounts from which the reviews and ratings originate. This means that the reviews come from actual iOS users, and more importantly, users who are likely to continue using the app after they review it. This authentic engagement can lead to long-term benefits, such as increased app retention and organic growth.

2. Customizable Review Packages

ElanceMarket understands that every app has different marketing needs. As a result, they offer fully customizable review packages where app developers can specify the number of reviews they need, the timing of the reviews, and even the content of the reviews. This personalized approach ensures that the reviews and ratings reflect the actual value of the app, enhancing its credibility.

3. Comprehensive Marketing Strategy

Buying reviews and ratings is just one part of the equation. To achieve long-term success in the App Store, you need a comprehensive marketing strategy. ElanceMarket offers an all-in-one solution that includes not only reviews and ratings but also keyword installs, ASO, and user acquisition strategies. This holistic approach ensures that your app doesn't just gain short-term visibility, but continues to grow over time.

4. Focus on Safety and Compliance

One of the main concerns when buying reviews and ratings is the risk of violating Apple’s guidelines. ElanceMarket is fully aware of these risks and has developed a strategy that focuses on organic growth and compliance with all relevant regulations. This means that when you purchase reviews from ElanceMarket, you can rest assured that your app is not at risk of being penalized or removed from the App Store.

5. Affordable Pricing

ElanceMarket offers competitive pricing, making it accessible to both indie developers and larger app development firms. Their pricing plans are transparent, with no hidden fees, and they offer a range of packages to suit various budgets and needs.

Conclusion

In the competitive landscape of the App Store, buying reviews and ratings can give your iOS app the boost it needs to succeed. However, choosing the right platform is crucial. While several websites offer these services, ElanceMarket stands out due to its commitment to quality, authenticity, and compliance with Apple’s guidelines. With its customizable review packages, targeted demographic options, and comprehensive marketing solutions, ElanceMarket provides the tools you need to elevate your app’s visibility, credibility, and success.

[mechanical-artery]

its MY birthday and and I get to make everyone look at this old guy

[nr1-logo-design-inspiration]

Apple logo concept. What do you think? 👇😅

[thebeastofblackmoor]

not to brag but I do still have my ancient iPod touch from 2014 💎

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Web apps could de-monopolize mobile devices

Mobile tech is a duopoly run by two companies — Google and Apple — with a combined market cap of $3.5 trillion. Each company uses a combination of tech, law, contract and market power to force sellers to do commerce via an app, and each one extracts a massive commission on all in-app sales — 15–30%!

This is bad for users and workers. Many companies’ gross margins are less than 30%. In some categories, that means there’s no competition. Take audiobooks: publishers wholesale their audiobooks to retailers at a 20% discount, so a retailer that sells its audiobooks through an app, paying a 30% commission, will lose money through every sale.

This is why the only convenient mobile audiobook stores are Apple Books (a front-end for Amazon’s Audible) and Google Books: Apple doesn’t have to pay the Apple tax, and Google doesn’t have to pay the Google tax, and that means that Apple and Google can demand crippling discounts and preferential treatment from publishers and independent authors.

The app tax is a tax on the workers whose creative works are sold on mobile platforms, because creative workers have the least bargaining power in this monopolized supply-chain. Our publishers can squeeze us — and the editorial workers, narrators, and sound technicians who work on our books — to make up the difference.

Independent authors who sell directly on these platforms, meanwhile, have even less leverage and get even worse terms. Things aren’t much better at the other end of the supply-chain, either: while firms prefer to wring concessions out of their workers and suppliers, they’re not averse to raising prices on customers, providing that all the competitors do so as well.

Since every competitor is also selling through an app store and either paying a direct app tax or ceding margin to the mobile duopoly as a condition of selling in their in-house, pre-installed stores, they all have the same incentive to raise prices.

Economists call this the monopsony problem (or, since we’re talking about two companies, a duopsony or oligopsony problem). That’s an unwieldy and esoteric term, so Rebecca Giblin and I coined a much better one, and wrote a book about it: Chokepoint Capitalism:

https://chokepointcapitalism.com/

Theoretically, there’s a way to avoid the app store chokepoint: web apps. These are part of the HTML5 standard, and if a browser fully implements that standard, then developers can make a self-encapsulated “app” that’s delivered in the browser, complete with an icon for your home screen, capable of doing anything an app store app can do.

A company that wants to sell stuff without paying the app tax could hypothetically deliver a web app that the user could download and install via their browser. This doesn’t just avoid the app tax, it also overrides the app stores’ editorial control, like Apple’s decision to block privacy tools in China to aid in state surveillance.

But you can’t have a web app without a web-app-compatible browser, and you can’t get a web-app-compatible browser in Apple’s App Store. The only browsers permitted in the App Store are those based on WebKit, the browser engine behind Safari. This means that every browser on Ios, from Firefox to Edge to Chrome, is just a reskinned version of Safari.

That’s a problem, because Webkit suuuuuuucks. Without the discipline imposed by either regulation or competition, Apple has systematically underinvested in Webkit, so that major bugs remain unaddressed for years and years. Some of these bugs are functional — Webkit just doesn’t act the way its documentation says it does — but others represent serious security vulnerabilities.

This is an important point: app store proponents say that denying users the right to choose where they get their apps and excluding competitors is necessary, the only practical way to prevent security risks to users. But while app stores can prevent the introduction of insecure or malicious code, they can also block the introduction of code that fixes defects in the manufacturer’s own security.

Mobile companies don’t want insecure code on their platforms, but they also don’t want to erode their profits. An Iphone with a working VPN app is more secure than one that lacks that app, but if that Iphone is owned by a Chinese person, it endangers Apple’s access to low-waged Chinese labor and 350 million affluent Chinese consumers.

Likewise, a third party might create a browser engine that corrects the security defects in Webkit, but if Apple allows users to install such a browser engine, they will lose the ability to extract billions through the app tax.

Companies never solely pursue their customers’ interests. Instead, they seek an equilibrium that allocates as much value as possible to their shareholders. This allocation is limited by both competition (the fear that a bad service will drive customers to a rival) and regulation (the fear that a bad service will attract crushing fines).

The less competition and regulation a company faces, the more value it can take from its users and give to its shareholders. Here, mobile platforms have it easy: they don’t have to worry about competition because of regulation. Laws like Section1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Article 6 of the EU Copyright Directive (EUCD) make it illegal to jailbreak a phone to install third-party apps. Jay Freeman calls this “felony contempt of business model” — that is, the government will punish your competitors for trying to compete with you. Nice work if you can get it.

As the old joke goes, “if you wanted to get there, I wouldn’t start from here.” The rules that should promote better corporate conduct (through competition) instead encourage worse behavior, by putting companies in charge of who gets to compete with them, in the name of user safety.

Meanwhile, users are increasingly trapped inside walled gardens, because their media, apps, and data are locked up in mobile silos and switching to a rival means enduring the switching costs of leaving it all behind. Mobile companies claim to have built fortresses to keep bad guys out, but those high walls make fortresses into prisons that keep customers locked in.

But anything that can’t go on forever will eventually stop. The manifest unfairness and insecurity of the regulation-backed walled garden model has attracted the interest of new trustbusters, competition regulators from China to the EU to the USA to the UK.

The UK plays a key role here. The country’s Competitions and Markets Authority boasts the largest workforce of technical experts of any competition regulator in the world: the CMA’s Digital Markets Unit has 50+ full-time engineers, which allows it to produce the most detailed, most insightful market investigations of any nation’s competition regulators.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/digital-markets-unit

(Don’t get too excited, though: in keeping with the UK’s abysmal standard of government competence, Parliament has yet to pass the long-overdue secondary legislation that would give the DMU its own enforcement powers. Ugh.)

Last June, the CMA proposed a market investigation into cloud gaming and mobile browsers (gaming is the largest source of app store revenue and cloud gaming is a way to avoid the app tax, so it’s a closely related issue):

https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/mobile-browsers-and-cloud-gaming

There were many significant submissions over this proposal, including comments that EFF legal intern Shashank Sirivolu and I drafted:

https://www.eff.org/document/comments-electronic-frontier-foundation-cmas-inquiry-mobile-browsers-and-cloud-gaming

Many commenters (including EFF) proposed that the CMA should intervene to improve the state browser engines competition on Ios and Android (Android allows multiple browser engines, but doesn’t give them the same hardware access that Chrome and its Blink engine enjoy).

This argument seems to have landed for the CMA. Today, they announced that they would go ahead with a full-fledged market study into mobile browsers and cloud gaming:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63984ce2d3bf7f3f7e762453/Issues_statement_.pdf

The most obvious outcome of this study would be an order forcing the mobile vendors to open up to full-featured, alternative browser engines. This is compromise solution, between forcing open app stores onto the platforms — which would mean forcing Apple to allow sideloading and policing Google’s use of contracts to limit third-party stores — and doing nothing.

A browser engine mandate is less satisfying than open app stores, but it is also more achievable, and easier to monitor and enforce. With Android, Google proved that you don’t have to use hardware locks to prevent third-party app stores — you can use a hard-to-detect web of contracts and incentives to create an app store monopoly that’s nearly as airtight as Apple’s.

But policing whether a platform permits rival, full-featured browser engines — ones that enable web apps and cloud gaming without paying the app tax — is much easier. Also easier: developing objective standards for evaluating whether a browser engine is secure and robust. Open Web Advocacy’s criteria are a great starting point:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1118238/Open_Web_Advocacy_-_Consultation_response_-_Publication_version.pdf#h.q9nder968wzm

The CMA announcement is welcome, but has some gaps. It under-emphasises the importance of hardware access (for web apps to compete with native apps, they need full hardware access), and could leave new browser engines at the mercy of the existing review teams that review all the other apps in the app store (who reject rival browser engines out of hand).

Meanwhile, while I was writing this article, Mark Gurman published a jaw-dropping scoop in Bloomberg: Apple will open its Ios platform to rival app stores by 2024, in order to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA):

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-13/will-apple-allow-users-to-install-third-party-app-stores-sideload-in-europe I’m still absorbing this news, but I think this complements the CMA browser engine work, rather than rendering it redundant. Alternative app stores don’t necessarily mean alternative browser engines. Apple says it will have security standards for alternative app stores, and these standards could well include a ban on browser engines. At a minimum, it’s clear that different levels of scrutiny need to be applied to apps, app stores, and browser engines, as each one poses different threats and opportunities.

[Image ID: London's Canary Wharf, a high-rise business district that is home to the UK Competition and Markets Authority. The colours of the buildings have been inverted, and the sky has been filled with a Matrix 'waterfall' graphic. In the foreground is an ogrish giant, standing at a console, yanking on a lever in the shape of a golden dollar-sign. The console is emblazoned with the logos for Chrome and Safari. The ogre is disdainfully holding aloft a mobile phone. On the phone's screen is a Gilded Age editorial cartoon of a business-man with a dollar-sign for a head. The phone itself is limned with a greenish supernova of radiating light.]

[maredirabbia]

Party night, with my film agency

[tecdisha]

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Unbelievable AI Power at a Price That Amazes

Samsung’s Galaxy S24 FE has finally arrived, and it's making waves with its cutting-edge Galaxy AI capabilities and powerful Exynos processor. Packed with flagship-level features at a more affordable price, this Fan Edition smartphone offers the perfect balance between premium performance and accessibility. Let's dive into what makes the Galaxy S24 FE a standout choice for tech enthusiasts looking for value without compromise.

Read full update

[lonelysmile]

Prof Pessina 🧑‍🏫

[gelatinatremolante]

di dove sei?

(purtroppo)

[utlitsolution]

UTL IT Solution offers Digital marketing services to help businesses reach their online goals. Their services include social media management, search engine optimization, and online advertising strategies. They work with clients to create customized marketing plans that drive traffic and enhance brand visibility online.

[navdurga32]

Where can I buy iOS app reviews?

In the competitive landscape of the Apple App Store, user reviews and ratings play a pivotal role in determining an app's success. They not only influence potential users' decisions but also impact an app's ranking in the App Store's search results. A higher number of positive reviews can lead to better visibility, more downloads, and ultimately, increased revenue. However, garnering reviews organically can be a slow process, particularly for new apps. This is where the strategy of purchasing iOS app reviews comes into play.

Where to Buy iOS App Reviews?

When considering purchasing iOS app reviews, it's crucial to choose a reputable platform that provides genuine and high-quality reviews. Several platforms offer this service, but the quality, reliability, and ethical considerations can vary significantly. Below are some of the key options:

Elance Market: Elance Market is a leading platform where app developers and marketers can purchase iOS app reviews. The platform is renowned for its transparent process, high-quality reviews, and commitment to ethical practices. Elance Market ensures that the reviews are from real users, which helps maintain the integrity of your app and avoid penalties from Apple.

ASOeShop: Known for its app store optimization services, ASOeShop also offers iOS app review services. The platform focuses on providing reviews that are keyword-optimized, helping to improve your app's visibility and ranking on the App Store.

AppSally: AppSally offers a comprehensive range of app marketing services, including iOS app reviews. The platform emphasizes delivering reviews from genuine users, ensuring that they appear natural and beneficial for your app's reputation.

Buy Real Marketing: As the name suggests, Buy Real Marketing provides real user reviews for iOS apps. They have a straightforward process and offer customizable packages to suit different marketing needs.

GetAFollower: GetAFollower is another platform where you can purchase iOS app reviews. They focus on delivering reviews that are geographically targeted, which can be particularly useful for apps targeting specific regions.

While these platforms provide similar services, it’s essential to choose one that aligns with your app’s specific needs and goals. Among these, Elance Market stands out for several reasons.

Why Elance Market is One of the Best Websites to Buy iOS App Reviews?

Elance Market has established itself as a top-tier platform for buying iOS app reviews. Here’s why it’s considered one of the best:

1. High-Quality, Genuine Reviews

Elance Market is committed to providing authentic reviews from real users. Unlike some platforms that use bots or fake accounts, Elance Market ensures that each review comes from a legitimate user who has interacted with your app. This not only helps in building trust with potential users but also reduces the risk of your app being penalized by Apple for fraudulent activity.

2. Customizable Review Packages

Understanding that different apps have different needs, Elance Market offers customizable review packages. Whether you need a few reviews to boost your app’s credibility or a larger number to improve your app’s ranking, Elance Market provides flexible options to meet your requirements. The platform also allows you to specify certain aspects of the reviews, such as mentioning specific features of your app, which can be highly beneficial for highlighting key selling points.

3. Ethical and Transparent Practices

One of the biggest concerns when buying app reviews is the ethical implications. Elance Market operates with a high degree of transparency and ethics. They ensure that all reviews are compliant with Apple’s guidelines, which means you don’t have to worry about your app being removed from the App Store due to unethical practices. The platform’s commitment to integrity makes it a reliable choice for developers who want to enhance their app’s reputation without compromising on ethics.

4. Expertise in App Store Optimization (ASO)

Elance Market isn’t just about providing reviews; it’s about helping your app succeed in the highly competitive App Store environment. The platform’s expertise in App Store Optimization (ASO) means that the reviews are strategically crafted to include relevant keywords, enhancing your app’s visibility in search results. This dual focus on quality reviews and ASO gives your app a significant edge over competitors.

5. Comprehensive Support and Consultation

Elance Market goes beyond just selling reviews. The platform offers comprehensive support and consultation services to help you make the most of your purchase. Whether you need advice on how many reviews to buy or how to optimize your app listing, Elance Market’s team of experts is available to guide you through the process. This level of support is particularly valuable for new developers who may not be familiar with the nuances of app marketing.

6. Positive User Feedback and Reputation

The success of any platform can be gauged by the feedback it receives from its users. Elance Market has garnered positive reviews from a wide range of clients, from indie developers to large companies. The platform’s reputation for delivering quality and value has made it a go-to choice for many in the app development community.

7. Affordable Pricing

While quality often comes at a price, Elance Market offers competitive and affordable pricing for its iOS app review services. The platform provides various pricing tiers to cater to different budgets, ensuring that even smaller developers can access high-quality reviews. This affordability, coupled with the quality of service, makes Elance Market a cost-effective solution for boosting your app’s presence on the App Store.

8. User-Friendly Interface

Elance Market’s platform is designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for developers to navigate and purchase reviews. The process is straightforward, and the platform provides clear instructions at each step, ensuring a seamless experience from start to finish.

Conclusion: Why Elance Market is the Best Choice for iOS App Reviews

In the crowded and competitive App Store environment, having a robust strategy for gathering user reviews is crucial for success. While there are several platforms available for purchasing iOS app reviews, Elance Market stands out due to its commitment to quality, ethical practices, and comprehensive support. By choosing Elance Market, developers can enhance their app’s credibility, improve its ranking, and ultimately drive more downloads and revenue.

Elance Market’s reputation for delivering genuine, high-quality reviews, coupled with its expertise in ASO and affordable pricing, makes it one of the best websites to buy iOS app reviews. Whether you’re a new developer looking to establish your app’s presence or an experienced marketer aiming to boost an app’s ranking, Elance Market provides the tools and support needed to achieve your goals.

[ars-webtech]

Transforming Healthcare in Dubai: The Digital Revolution Through App Innovation

In the United Arab Emirates, the landscape of healthcare has undergone a transformative shift, predominantly propelled by the evolution of app development in the health sector. This exposition, with a particular focus on Dubai, elucidates the diverse ways in which these technological advancements have redefined aspects of patient care, access to medical services, and the overall dynamics of medical procedures.

Dubai stands as a pioneer in this transformative journey, leading the incorporation of cutting-edge healthcare applications. These digital solutions have revolutionized conventional healthcare delivery, encompassing a range of services from remote consultations to the simplification of appointment scheduling. This narrative aims to unfold Dubai's role as a leader in reshaping healthcare, underscoring advancements in access, patient engagement, and the overall efficiency of healthcare processes.

The rise of sophisticated and beneficial healthcare applications marks a significant shift in the UAE's approach to healthcare delivery. User-friendly and enhancing access and convenience, these apps have become fundamental to the modern healthcare system in the UAE. This examination delves into the influence of these applications on the national healthcare landscape, highlighting their contribution to the advancement of digital health solutions.

In the medical realm of Dubai, healthcare applications have emerged as indispensable tools for both healthcare providers and patients. Their functionalities vary, ranging from enabling appointment bookings to facilitating virtual medical consultations and ongoing health monitoring. The surge in healthcare app development in Dubai has democratized access to healthcare, making it more accessible and convenient for all. As these applications continue to refine the healthcare experience, Dubai is at the forefront of integrating technology into daily life, making healthcare an integral part of our daily existence.

The widespread adoption of smartphones in the UAE has been a catalyst for the rapid embrace of healthcare applications. This integration of healthcare apps into daily life has streamlined access to healthcare services, thanks to the increasing use of smartphones.

A notable revolution in healthcare in Dubai is the mainstreaming of virtual consultations. This paradigm shift allows patients to engage with healthcare professionals from the comfort of their homes, significantly enhancing accessibility and convenience. The significant role played by pharmacy delivery app developers in Dubai in facilitating this transition is noteworthy.

In terms of appointment scheduling and reminders, healthcare applications in Dubai have brought about a significant transformation. The emergence of Android app developers in Dubai has led to the creation of platforms that automate appointment reminders and simplify the scheduling process. This technological integration has enhanced the patient experience and contributed to improved health outcomes.

Personalized health information provided through healthcare apps empowers individuals to actively manage their health. These applications, developed with the expertise of IO developers in Dubai, focus on user-friendly solutions, making the healthcare system more efficient and centered on patient needs.

Medication management is a crucial aspect of patient care. Healthcare applications assist users in effectively managing their medications, providing timely reminders, and information about drug interactions and side effects. The synergy of virtual consultations and pharmacy delivery apps is transforming the healthcare delivery model in Dubai, increasing convenience for patients.

The integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) through healthcare applications has revolutionized the sharing of medical information among healthcare providers in the UAE. This significant development, supported by E-learning app development companies in the UAE, has enhanced the efficiency of healthcare delivery and strengthened patient safety.

Data analytics generated by healthcare applications provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals in the UAE. This approach, driven by data, facilitates evidence-based decision-making, leading to markedly improved patient outcomes. The analytical capabilities of these applications represent a crucial shift towards a more informed and efficient healthcare system.

While the adoption of healthcare applications raises concerns about the security of medical data, developers in the UAE are committed to implementing robust security measures. This dedication ensures the protection of patient information and aligns with strict data protection regulations, reinforcing user confidence in the use of healthcare applications.

In the UAE, the development of healthcare applications adheres to strict regulatory frameworks, such as the Health Data Protection Regulation. This commitment to compliance ensures the responsible handling of patient data, building trust among users. The emphasis on regulatory adherence highlights the dedication to maintaining high standards of data security and privacy in healthcare applications.

In conclusion, the advent of healthcare applications in the UAE has significantly impacted the healthcare sector. These applications have facilitated easier access to and interaction with healthcare services, becoming an essential part of modern healthcare. As technology continues to evolve, the UAE's healthcare sector is poised for further innovation. This future envisions a healthcare experience that goes beyond providing services, merging technology with compassionate care. Ars Webtech is at the forefront of this revolution, committed to pioneering innovative healthcare solutions and striving towards a future where healthcare is not just a necessity but a personalized journey towards well-being.

[nextdynamix]

Elevating Web Development: Exploring NextDynamix as the Best MEAN Stack Development Services Company in Australia

MEAN stack is a popular option for developing dynamic and scalable applications in the ever-changing web development landscape. MEAN stack, which consists of MongoDB Express.js Angular and Node.js offers a complete solution for full-stack web development. This allows businesses to easily create powerful, responsive applications. Businesses in Australia are turning more and more to MEAN stack services to stay on top of their game. NextDynamix is proud to be recognized as Australia's best MEAN stack company, providing unparalleled expertise and innovative solutions for our clients.

Understanding MEAN Stack Development

MEAN stack development is a powerful combination of four powerful technologies that delivers a smooth and efficient development environment. MongoDB is a NoSQL data store that offers flexibility and scalability. Express.js makes it easy to build robust server-side apps. Node.js is a server-side scripting language that allows developers to create fast and scalable networks applications. Together, these technologies create a powerful stack which empowers developers to build modern and responsive web apps that meet the changing needs of users and businesses.

Why choose NextDynamix MEAN Stack Development Services ?

NextDynamix is the leading MEAN development company in Australia. We bring a wealth experience and expertise to the table. Our experienced developers have a thorough understanding of the MEAN ecosystem. This allows us to maximize its potential and provide exceptional results for clients. We can bring your vision to reality with precision and finesse, whether you are a startup or an enterprise looking to launch a web application.

Comprehensive MEAN Stack Development Solutions

NextDynamix offers a complete suite of MEAN stack services that are tailored to meet the specific needs of each client. We work closely with clients from project conception and planning, to implementation and deployment to ensure their vision is fully realized. We can meet your requirements and expectations, whether you are looking to hire MEAN stack developers on a permanent basis or to engage our team to work on a particular project.

Harnessing MEAN Stack Technology

MEAN stack offers businesses the opportunity to create responsive and modern web applications that engage their users and deliver results. NextDynamix has expertise in all MEAN stack components, which allows us to maximize the potential of each to deliver exceptional results to our clients. We can build any type of application you want, whether it's a custom ecommerce platform, an enterprise solution or a consumer-facing app.

Driving Innovation and Growth

Staying ahead of the curve in today's digital world is a constant challenge. Innovation and adaptation are essential. NextDynamix is your MEAN stack partner. You can be confident that your web apps will be developed using the latest technologies, best practices and tools, helping you to stay ahead of your competition and grow your business. We can help you with any project, whether you want to optimize performance, integrate new features, or scale up your current infrastructure.

Conclusion

MEAN stack has become a popular choice among businesses that want to remain ahead of the curve. NextDynamix is your MEAN stack partner. With NextDynamix, you will be able to unlock new possibilities for your business and reach your goals with confidence. Call us to find out more about MEAN stack services.

[donotdestroy]

[mostlysignssomeportents]

How Apple could open its App Store without really opening its App Store

Last week, Mark Gurman published a blockbuster story in Bloomberg, revealing Apple’s plan to allow third-party Ios App Stores to comply with the EU’s Digital Markets Act. Apple didn’t confirm it, but I believe it. Gurman’s sourcing was impeccable:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-13/will-apple-allow-users-to-install-third-party-app-stores-sideload-in-europe

This is a huge deal. While Apple’s “curated” approach to software delivers benefits to users, those benefits are unreliable. As I explain in a new post for EFF’s Deeplinks blog, Apple only fights for its users when doing so is good for its shareholders. But when something is good for Apple shareholders and bad for its customers, the shareholders win, every time:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/12/heres-how-apple-could-open-its-app-store-without-really-opening-its-app-store

To see how this works, just consider Apple’s record in China. First, Apple removed all working VPN apps from its Chinese App Store, to facilitate state spying on its Chinese customers:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-apple-vpn/apple-says-it-is-removing-vpn-services-from-china-app-store-idUSKBN1AE0BQ

Then Apple backdoored its Chinese cloud servers, to further facilitate state surveillance of Chinese Iphone owners:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-censorship-data.html

Then, just last month, Apple neutered Airdrop’s P2P file-sharing in order to help the Chinese state in its campaign to stamp out protests:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/11/apple-limits-iphone-filesharing-feature-used-by-protesters-in-china

Apple claims that its App Store is a fortress that protects its users against external threats. But the Iphone is designed to block its owners from choosing rival app stores, which means that when Apple betrays its customers, the fortress walls become prison walls. Governments know this, and they rely on it when they demand that Apple compromise its customers to totalitarian surveillance:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/11/foreseeable-consequences/#airdropped

Now, there’s an interesting contrast here. When the DFBI demanded that Apple backdoor its devices to aid in the prosecution of the San Bernardino shooters, Apple took its customers’ side, bravely refusing to compromise its devices:

https://www.eff.org/cases/apple-challenges-fbi-all-writs-act-order

That was the right call to make. Does it mean that Apple doesn’t value privacy for its Chinese customers’ privacy as much as it values it for American customers? Does it mean that Apple respects the CCP more than it respects the FBI?

Not at all. It just means that China was able to threaten Apple’s shareholders in ways that the DoJ couldn’t. Standing up to the Chinese government would threaten Apple’s access to 350 million middle-class Chinese potential customers, and an equal number of Chinese low-waged workers who could be tapped to manufacture Apple devices under brutal labor conditions at rock-bottom prices.

Standing up to the FBI didn’t threaten Apple’s shareholders the way that standing up to the CCP would, so Apple stood up for its American users and sold out its Chinese users.

But that doesn’t mean that US Apple customers are safe. In the US, Apple defends its customers from rival commercial threats, but actively prevents those customers from defending themselves against Apple’s own commercial threats.

Famously, Apple took its customers side over Facebook’s, adding an amazing, best-in-class, one-click opt-out to tracking, which is costing Facebook $10 billion per year. You love to see it:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/facebook-says-apple-ios-privacy-change-will-cost-10-billion-this-year.html

On the other hand…Apple secretly continued to its customers’ clicks, taps, gestures, apps and keystrokes, even after those customers explicitly opted out of tracking, and used that data to build nonconsensual dossiers on every Ios owner for use in its own ad-targeting business:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

Apple defended its customers against Facebook’s predation, but not its own. When Apple’s shareholder interests are on the line, Apple’s App Store becomes a prison, not a fortress: because Apple controls which software you can install, it can (and does) block you from installing apps that extend its block on commercial surveillance to Apple itself.

Then there’s the app tax. Apple charges app makers a 30% commission on all their sales, which means that certain businesses literally can’t exist. Take audiobooks: audiobook sellers have 20% gross margins on their wares. If they sell their audiobooks through apps and pay a 30% vig to Apple, they lose money on every sale. Thus, the only Ios app that will sell you an audiobook is Apple’s own Apple Books.

Apple Books requires authors and publishers to wrap their books in Apple’s DRM, and the DMCA makes it a felony to supply your own readers with a tool to convert the books you published to a rival’s format. That means that readers have to surrender every book they’ve bought on Apple Books if you switch platforms and ask them to follow you. It’s not just social media that turns creators into digital sharecroppers.

It’s not any better when it comes to the businesses that can eke out an existence under the app tax’s yoke. These businesses pass their extra costs on to Apple’s customers, who ultimately bear the app tax burden. Because every app maker has to pay the app tax, they all tacitly collude to hike their prices. And because mobile is a duopoly, the app tax is also buried in every Android app, because Google has exactly the same app tax as Apple (Google will also be forced to remove barriers to third-party app stores under the DMA).

All this to say that it is a terrible error to impute morals or values to giant corporations. Apple and Google are both immortal colony organisms that view human beings as inconvenient gut flora. They are remorseless paperclip-maximizing artificial life forms. They are, in other words, limited liability corporations.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/paperclip-maximizer

“If you’re not paying for the product, you’re the product” sounds good, but it’s absolutely wrong. You can’t bribe a paperclip-maximizing colony organism into treating you with dignity by spending money with it. Companies’ treatment of you depends on what they can get away with — not their “personalities.” Apple doesn’t respect privacy — it thinks it can make more paperclips by giving some of its customers some privacy. As soon as Apple finds a way to make more paperclips by spying on those you (say, by starting its own internal adtech business), it will spy on you, and the $1000 you spent on your Iphone will not save you.

Once you understand that corporate conduct is a matter of power, not personality, then you understand that the way to prevent companies from harming you is to meet their power with countervailing power. This is why tech worker unions matter: organized labor has historically been the most important check on corporate power, which is why tech companies are so vicious in the face of union drives:

https://www.epi.org/publication/unions-decline-inequality-rises/

Beyond labor, two other forces can discipline corporate conduct: regulation and competition. The biggest threat to a business’s customers is that business’s own shareholders. A company might defend its customers against a rival, but they will never defend its customers against its own shareholders.

Regulation and competition both impose costs on shareholder who abuse their customers: regulation can punish bad conduct with fines that come out of shareholder profits, and competition can create a race to the top as businesses seek to poach each others’ customers by offering them progressively better deals.

Which brings me back to the DMA, the EU’s pending regulation forcing Apple to open its app store, and Apple’s leaked plans to comply with the regulation. This is (potentially) great news, because rival app stores can offer Apple customers an escape hatch from mandatory surveillance and price-gouging.

But the devil is in the details. There are so many ways that Apple can use malicious compliance to appear to offer a competitive app marketplace without actually doing so. In my article for EFF, I offer a checklist of fuckieries to watch for in Apple’s plans:

• Forcing software authors in Apple’s Developer Program. Not only does this force developers to pay Apple for the privilege of selling to Iphone owners, but it also forces them to sign onto a Bible-thick EULA that places all kinds of arbitrary limits on their software. It’s not enough for Apple to open up to rival app stores — it also must not sabotage rivals who produce competing SDKs for Ios.

• Forcing App Store criteria on rival app stores. Apple mustn’t be permitted to turn legitimate vetting for security or privacy risks into editorial control over which apps Ios users are allowed to use. Apple may not want to carry games that highlight labor conditions in high-tech manufacturing sweatshops:

https://venturebeat.com/games/apple-drops-uncomfortable-sweatshop-hd-game-from-app-store/

And it may object to apps that track US drone killings of civilians abroad:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/aug/30/apple-blocks-us-drone-strike-app

But those arbitrary editorial conditions shouldn’t be imposed on rival app stores.

• Taxing rival app stores for “security vetting.” Apple is not the only entity qualified to assess the security of apps:

https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2022/01/letter-to-the-us-senate-judiciary-committee-on-app-stores.html

and it’s just as capable as its rivals of making grave errors:

https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/apple-fixes-exploited-iphone-zero/

It’s fine to say that app stores must submit to third-party security certification, but they should be free to choose Apple out of a field of qualified privacy certifiers.

• Requiring third-party app stores to process payments with Apple. The app tax should be disciplined by competition. Allowing Apple to extract 30% from transactions in its rivals’ app stores would defeat the whole purpose of the DMA.

• Arbitrarily revoking third party app stores. It’s foreseeable that some third-party app stores would be so incompetent or malicious that Apple could revoke their ability to operate on Ios devices. However, if Apple were to pretextually shut down third-party app stores, it could sour Iphone owners off the whole prospect of getting apps elsewhere.

Apple must not be permitted to use its power to shut down app stores in an anti-competitive way, but distinguishing pretextual shutdowns from bona fide ones is a time-consuming, fact-intensive process that could leave customers in limbo for years.

One way to manage this is for regulators to dangle massive fines for pretextual shutdowns. In addition to this, Apple must make some provision to continue its customers’ access to the apps, media and data from the app stores it shuts down.

All of this points to the role that regulators pay, even (especially) when it comes to disciplining companies through competition. The DMA is overseen by the EU Commission, which has the power to investigate, verify and approve (or reject) the standards that Apple sets for privacy, security, and app stores themselves. The Commission should anticipate and fund the regulators needed to manage these tasks quickly, thoroughly and efficiently.

Finally, Europeans shouldn’t have all the fun. If Apple can do this for Europeans, it can do it for every Apple device owner. If you bought an Ios device, it’s yours, not Apple’s, and you should have the right to technological self determination that Europeans get when it comes to deciding which software it runs.

Image: Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/files/banner_library/eu-flag-11.png

CC BY 3.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/

[Image ID: An EU flag. The blue background has a fine tracery of etched circuitry.]

[perilegs]

I would love to get into more new farm sim and visual novel games, but I feel like a lot of them not only fail to create their own unique games, but present a very sanitized story and characters.

For the uniqueness aspect - it's not enough to create "stardew valley but 3d and in space" or something. It's still a stardew valley copy. Taking inspiration is one thing, but what new are you bringing to the table if your only source of inspiration is one game? I've already spent hundreds of hours with these exact mechanics on another game, why should I do that on something that is basically just a reskin of that?

And I feel like when it comes to characters and story, a lot of creators are afraid of negative feedback or doing something wrong, so they keep all of their characters very "morally good" and pure and sanitized so there's no real character development. Characters may have a troubled past or struggle with something, but god forbid if it affects them as a character in any negative way.

Idk something about marketability ruining creativity.