#industry applications

[techdriveplay]

Why Quantum Computing Will Change the Tech Landscape

The technology industry has seen significant advancements over the past few decades, but nothing quite as transformative as quantum computing promises to be. Why Quantum Computing Will Change the Tech Landscape is not just a matter of speculation; it’s grounded in the science of how we compute and the immense potential of quantum mechanics to revolutionise various sectors. As traditional…

[ai-innova7ions]

Video Automatically Generated by Faceless.Video.

Custom AI Models Transforming Industries!

Customizable generative AI is transforming how businesses operate by enabling the creation of tailored AI models that meet specific enterprise needs. These adaptable models can be fine-tuned for various tasks and industries, significantly enhancing their effectiveness across different applications. Imagine a generative AI model designed to provide customized product recommendations for an e-commerce platform, elevating the shopping experience for customers. This cutting-edge technology empowers businesses to deliver more personalized services, ultimately increasing customer satisfaction and engagement. Discover how these innovations are reshaping the future of business operations!

DeepBrain AI's comprehensive feature set empowers users to create professional-grade video content efficiently, democratizing the video production process and enabling creators to focus on storytelling and engagement rather than technical complexities.

What sets Krater AI apart from its competitors is its unparalleled ability to generate high-quality content with remarkable accuracy and efficiency. Unlike other AI products that focus on a broad range of applications, Krater AI hones in on content creation, making it an essential tool for writers, marketers, and content creators looking to streamline their workflow and boost productivity.

Synthesia AI democratizes video production, making it accessible to a broader audience than ever before. Small businesses can now create engaging marketing materials; educators can develop dynamic learning resources; and individuals can share their stories in new and captivating ways.

#GenerativeAI

#BusinessInnovation

[techninja]

Hydrogen Revolution: Electrolyzers Leading the Charge Towards Zero Emissions

Are you ready to delve into the future of energy? Buckle up as we explore the groundbreaking technology of electrolyzers and their pivotal role in reshaping the energy landscape. Understanding Electrolyzers: Unlocking the Power of Hydrogen In our quest for sustainable energy solutions, electrolyzers stand out as game-changers. These devices utilize an electrochemical process to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, offering a clean and efficient way to produce hydrogen gas. The Green Promise: Environmental Benefits of Electrolyzers One of the most compelling aspects of electrolyzers is their environmental friendliness. By harnessing renewable energy sources such as solar or wind power, electrolyzers can generate hydrogen with zero carbon emissions, paving the way for a greener future. Empowering Industries: Applications of Electrolyzers From transportation to manufacturing, electrolyzers have a wide range of applications across various industries. In the automotive sector, hydrogen fuel cells powered by electrolyzer-produced hydrogen offer a clean alternative to traditional fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating air pollution. Moreover, electrolyzers play a crucial role in industrial processes such as ammonia production and metal refining, where hydrogen serves as a key ingredient. Overcoming Challenges: Advancements in Electrolyzer Technology While electrolyzers hold immense potential, technological advancements are essential to overcome existing challenges. Improving efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing durability are among the primary focus areas for researchers and engineers working on electrolyzer development. By addressing these challenges, we can accelerate the adoption of electrolyzer technology on a global scale. Looking Ahead: The Future of Electrolyzers As we look to the future, electrolyzers are poised to play a central role in the transition to a sustainable energy economy. With ongoing research and innovation, we can expect electrolyzer technology to become more accessible, affordable, and efficient, driving widespread adoption and facilitating the shift towards clean energy solutions. Supporting Innovation: Join the Movement Are you passionate about shaping the future of energy? Join us on this journey towards sustainability by supporting initiatives that promote innovation and development in electrolyzer technology. Together, we can create a brighter, cleaner tomorrow for generations to come. In conclusion, electrolyzers represent a paradigm shift in energy production, offering a clean, efficient, and versatile solution to meet the growing demand for sustainable energy. By harnessing the power of electrolyzers, we can pave the way towards a brighter and greener future for our planet.  

[zeroneconsulting]

Predictive Coding: The Next Frontier in Software Development

In the rapidly evolving world of software development, predictive coding emerges as a significant advancement, reshaping how businesses approach problem-solving and innovation. This technology, leveraging generative AI, enhances computational power and cognition, allowing software to predict developer intents and automate coding tasks.

[allinhalf-store-blog]

Vuzix Blade, M100, Shield - Wearable Tech Revolution

Introduction Vuzix, a leading provider of wearable smart glasses and augmented reality (AR) technologies, has been at the forefront of this revolution, pioneering the development of cutting-edge devices that are reshaping the wearable tech landscape. The Vuzix Blade, Vuzix M100, and Vuzix Shield are three of its flagship products, each offering a unique set of features and capabilities to cater…

[bixels]

In the past, people in the Animal Crossing community would make fun of Tom Nook as a sleazy landlord. Since then, he's really rehabilitated his image as this 'heart of gold' businessman (he's the one who puts bells and furniture in trees for you to find! he adopted orphans! he donates to charity!), but New Horizons genuinely paints the most devious version of him.

He's successfully privatized settler colonialism: you pay HIM to move to a "deserted island" (which apparently the oceans in the AC world are just full of) and start a colony that he is directly invested in. At best he's running a weird vacation package scam (you arrive on the island with no money and in debt for "using his services"). At worst, he's using you to set up company towns. For god's sake, he literally has his own fake currency that he forces you to use to pay off your debt. But don't worry, he's repackaged it in a way that definitely doesn't sound like an MLM scam: the Nook Mileage Program!

You're no longer just his tenant or his temporary part-timer, you're his business lackey. The entire tutorial section of the game has you spending actual weeks running around completing tasks and doing hard labor to set up his colony. You're even tasked with preparing his properties and finding buyers for them. No, you aren't a tenant anymore. You work for the landlord. You are directly responsible for finding tenants for him. And he doesn't even fucking pay you. Not for setting up town hall and museum, or his nephew's shop –– which is the ONLY store on the entire island that sells necessities –– or bringing KK Slider to town, or helping populate his town. Not a single cent. No, actually, you have to pay HIM to BUY infrastructure like bridges and stairs and park benches. And all the while, he's telling you're the "resident representative"; you get to call the shots! That the reward is the community's progress. That what you're doing is in everyone's best interest (but most importantly, his).

Since NH's release, people have done a lot of legwork to say that Tom Nook isn't a capitalist while the game shows him at his very worst. He owns the only general store in town. You're forced to use a phone that he modified and branded as his own. Buy Nook-branded furniture and merchandise at the self-serve kiosk in the town hall, a governmental building! There's no conflict of interest here!

But hey, if you're tired of being the landlord/business mogul's goon, you can also find work as a deluxe resort home designer for a company that also pays you in their special company currency that can only be used to buy their products instead of a real salary! Because that's what the Animal Crossing franchise needs! More vacation homes!!!

[peachdoxie]

Your resume should include any relevant work experience and skills you have and it's good to include your volunteer work and internships (ideally four of them) as well as your multiple graduate degrees and the certifications you've earned during the process, and also your resume can only be one page in a font that's easy to read. This field is hard to break into because we have a lot of applicants for not a lot of openings and we'll keep them open for years until we find the perfect candidate. A great way to distinguish yourself is by taking any adjacent job you can find even if it means you have to work two or three part time jobs to make ends meet until a new opening is made. It's also good to tailor your resume to the companies and jobs you're applying for so that they know you researched the role and didn't send out mass applications, and oh, I highly, highly recommend that you keep your resume updated and a digital copy on hand so that you can email it to people at a moment's notice because it's good to keep an eye out for opportunities as they come up. Everyone around you has a master's degree and it's basically the new bachelor's and a PhD is the new master's and we really like seeing several years of work experience because there's a lot of stuff you can't learn in a classroom setting. It's a great field and I love working in it and you should pursue it if you're passionate about it!

[mantisgodsdomain]

Anyways, to those who have been wondering what we've been doing during our impromptu Tumblr Vacation or whatever we're calling it, we've been trying to find a playthrough of Baldur's Gate 3 that is made by someone who doesn't annoy the shit out of us, and also tormenting Karlach Cliffgate (as you do)

[soracities]

Hi! So I tried not to say anything about some anti makeup posts I saw on your blog but I need to say this. I think you're very wise and I agree it's very important for us to love ourselves as we are. But some people like myself doesn't care about 'empowering' of makeup or whatever but we just have fun with it and we just love it. I say we because I know there is a lot of people like me. Yeah, we are feeding capitalism or whatever, but world is beautiful and it's also terrible so people trying make themselves feel good, have fun, ect. I see a lot of people who don't wear makeup and i'm happy for them! I didn't wear makeup until i turned 20 i think and felt good.

One thing I wanted to add is in response of post about feminine girls. I think everything needs balance and sometimes people tend to overreact in their opinion and divide everything in black and white. Personally I never cared how women around me looked and what they were wearing. But I would like to have same treatment, and not to feel silly for wearing pink or feminine clothes.

Sorry, I don't know English very well so maybe I can't translate my idea entirely. What I'm trying to say i think everyone should do what they like and leave each other in peace.

Sorry for this essay, just wanted to share my point of view.

Hi, anon! I'm sorry for the delay in getting to this, but I appreciate you writing this (and your English was fine, don't worry)

I think the main argument of those posts (and my own feelings about this) is not about makeup on its own, or even judgement about who does and doesn't choose to wear it--what they are criticizing is a particular part of the society we live in which puts a huge emphasis on women's beauty and appearance in order to fulfill an idea of what a woman "should" be, and the role that makeup plays in that as a result. Because whether we like it or not, whether we believe in them or not, whether we feel pressured by them or not, these expectations do exist. How we personally respond to them does not change that.

I personally don't have an issue with makeup or the concept of it (in almost every culture on earth, humans have been using makeup of some kind for literally thousands of years)--but what I do have a problem with is when we treat makeup, or other traditionally "feminine" forms of expression as neutral things when they are not. A comb or a hair tie is neutral--it's just a thing. Lipstick and eyeliner are also just things, but only when they exist by themselves--and in reality they don't exist by themselves: they exist in a world where we value women on their physical appearance before we value them for anything else--lipstick and eyeliner exist to emphasise parts of your appearance, to make you look a certain way--and in a society where we put so much importance on women looking a certain way, they aren't just ordinary things you toy around with for fun. You can have fun with them, but it doesn't change their role. They can't be treated as exceptions from the world they are used in.

I think sometimes people assume that being anti-makeup is the same as being anti-women-who-wear-makeup, which misses the point (and also suggests a very dangerous idea which I think, sometimes, is why people respond so angrily to these criticisms: because if we believe that being anti-makeup = being anti-women, then therefore makeup = womanhood, and this is simply not true). Whether you wear these things just for fun and to enjoy yourself isn't what is being talked about because these criticisms are not about you on a personal level: they are about looking at a society that is as image-obsessed as ours, and asking why makeup has the role that it has when 1) it is almost exclusively aimed at women--women who, as a group, have been historically marginalised, and whose value, historically, has almost always been measured in terms of their beauty before anything else and 2) the makeup that is emphasized, the trends and styles that come and go, are often not so much about self-expression (if they were, people would be freely wearing all sorts of wild colours and styles: when we talk about "makeup culture" it's not the same kind of makeup used in the goth, punk, or alt scenes for example where makeup plays a very different role) but almost always about achieving or aspiring towards a type of beauty that is valued or expected: to make you look younger, to make your eyes brighter or larger, to make your lips bigger or sexier, your cheekbones more prominent etc--again, on their own, these things may not be a big deal, but they exist in a world where having these looks means you are valued in a certain way as a woman. And when this exists in our kind of world, where the power dynamics we have automatically mean women's perceived power is through beauty, and where we insist so much on women being a particular kind of beautiful (and this starts in childhood) we have to ask and investigate WHY that is--why this type of beauty and not another? why (almost only) women? who benefits from this? who suffers as a result?

The argument of "not all women" wear makeup for empowerment misses the point of these criticism, because it is focusing on a person's individual choices in a way that suggests our choices can define the world we live in, and they can't. We are deeply social animals. Therefore, how we appear to each other and to ourselves is a socially influenced phenomenon. This applies for race, for sexuality, and for gender. How women are perceived at large, in different social structures, is a social phenomenon influenced by the societies we exist in and the values of those societies. These criticisms are about the society we make those choices in and how that can affect us. For you, makeup may be something fun and enjoyable and that's fine. I'm not saying that's untrue or that people don't feel this way or that you are wrong for feeling this way. It's also not saying that you are brain-washed or oppressing yourself for it. But it doesn't change the world we live in. Someone feeling perfectly happy to go out with makeup or without makeup, and feeling no pressure to do either, is great--but it doesn't mean there aren't a lot of women who do feel pressured into wearing it, and that pressure is a social one. It doesn't change the inequality that exists between how women's physical appearances are judged compared to men's. It doesn't change the fact that almost every childhood story most kids hear (that aren't about animals) have a "beautiful princess" (and very little else is said about her except that she is beautiful) and a "brave" knight/prince/king/whichever: the princess (or maiden or whatever young woman) is defined by how she looks; the male in the story by how he acts.

It also doesn't change the fact that so many young girls grow up hearing the women around them criticize various parts of their bodies and that they carry this into their lives. It doesn't change the fact that we expect (in Western countries at least) for women to have criticisms about their appearance and they are "stuck-up" or "full of themselves" if they don't. It doesn't change the fact that magazines photos, red carpet photos, films, tv shows etc., feature actresses who are beautiful in a way that is absolutely above and beyond exceptional (and who either have had work done cosmetically, or are wealthy enough to be able to afford to look the way they do through top-class makeup artists, personal trainers etc) but who we think are within the "normal" range of beauty because faces like theirs are all that we see--how many famous actors / entertainers can you name who look like they could be someone's random uncle, or "just some guy" (writing this, I can think of 5). Now how many actresses, equally famous, can you think of that are the same? Very, very, very few.

The point of those posts, and why I feel so strongly about this, is that we have a deeply skewed view of beauty when it comes to women, because, as a society, we place so much on how they look in such a way that it is not, and was never meant to be, achievable: therefore anything that contributes to how women look, that markets itself in the way that the makeup industry does in this day and age, needs to be questioned and looked at in relation to that. No one is saying don't wear eyeliner or blush--what they are trying to say is that we need to be aware of the kind of world eyeliner and blush exists in, what their particular functions as eyeliner and blush do in the world that they exist in, that we exist in, and how this does impact the view we have on makeup as a result. Your personal enjoyment may be true to you and others, but this doesn't change the role of female beauty in the world because, again, our personal choices don't define the world in this way. Often, it's the other way around. And we cannot deny this fact because, while it may not affect you negatively, it does affect others.

I absolutely agree with you because I don't care how other women around me choose to dress or express themselves, either--that's their freedom to wear what they want and enjoy themselves and I want them to have that freedom. But my view is not the world's view, and it's certainly not the view of a lot of other people, either. I don't care if another woman loves pink and wearing skirts and dresses--but, like makeup, pink, skirts, and dresses, are not neutral things either. They're tied to a particular image of 'femininity' which means they are tied to a particular way of "being a woman" in this world. I'm not saying, at all, that it's wrong to wear these things. But I'm saying we can't treat them as though these are choices as simple as choosing what kind of socks to wear, because they aren't. They are choices that have baggage. If a woman is seen as being silly, childish, or treated unequally because she enjoys cute tops and ribbons and sundresses, that's not because we are demonizing her choices, or because being anti-makeup is being anti-woman (again, it is absolutely not): it's because we as a society demonize women for any choice. That isn't because of anti-makeup stances--that's because of sexism.

You mentioned that you want to be treated the same as anyone else for wearing feminine clothes--but the fear that you wouldn't be isn't because of the discussions critiquing makeup and other traditionally "feminine" things--it's because we live in a society where women are constantly defined by how they appear on the outside, and no amount of our personal choices will make this untrue. Whether you are a girly-girl or a tomboy, you'll always be judged. And, in reality, when women follow certain beauty standards they do get treated better--but this doesn't mean much in a society where the standards are so high you can never reach them, and where the basic regard for women is so low to begin with (not to mention the hypocrisy that exists within those standards). This is what all those criticisms towards makeup and "empowerment" are about: it's about interrogating a society that is built on this kind of logic and asking why we should insist on leaving it as it is when it does so much damage. It's saying that that if we want everyone to truly feel free in how they choose to present themselves we have to go deeper than just defining freedom by these choices on their own, and look at the environment those choices are made in. And that involves some deeply uncomfortable but necessary conversations.

Also, and I think this important to remember, views on makeup and the social place of makeup will also depend on culture and where you are, and the beauty expectations you grew up with. And when it comes to the internet, and given American dominance online, a lot of these posts criticizing makeup and the way makeup is being used to sell an idea that wearing it is "empowering" to the woman (which is basically saying: you are MORE of a woman when you wear it; you are stronger and more powerful because, in our society, beauty is portrayed as a form of power: it tells you, you can battle the inequality women face by embracing the role beauty plays in our lives but it doesn't tell you this emphasis on beauty is part of that inequality), are based on the way makeup is portrayed in mostly English-speaking Western countries. My views are shaped by what I grew up seeing, and while a full face of makeup (concealer, primer, foundation, mascara, highlighter, contour, blush, brow tint, brow gel etc) may not be daily practice or even embraced in a place like France or maybe other places in mainland Europe (but that doesn't mean they don't have their own expectations of feminine beauty), they are daily practice in places like the US and Britain, and this is what most of those posts and criticisms are responding to.

We can argue as much as we want about makeup, but when you grow up in a society where women feel the need to put on makeup before going to the gym there is something seriously wrong. Embracing makeup and enjoying makeup is one thing, but it cannot be a neutral thing when so much of it is about looking like you're not wearing makeup at all, or when we assume a woman is better qualified for a job or more professional when she wears it. It cannot be a neutral thing when a singer like Alicia Keys goes makeup-free for a red carpet event and it causes a stir online because people think she looks sick (what she looks like is normal--I would argue above normal--but wearing makeup to cover up "flaws" is so normal now that we genuinely don't know what normal skin is supposed to look like because the beauty of these celebrities is part of their appeal: they are something to aspire to). It is absolutely very normal for me, where I am, to see young girls with fake lashes and filled in brows: it's not every girl I pass, but it is enough. I'm not saying they are miserable, or brain-washed, or should be judged. I can believe that for them it's something enjoyable--but how am I supposed to see something like that and not be aware of the kind of celebrities and makeup tutorials that are everywhere on TikTok and YouTube, and that they are seeing everyday? How am I not supposed to have doubts when people tell me "it's their choice!" when the choices being offered are so limited and focused on one thing?

I never wore makeup as a teenager and I still don't, but a lot of that is because I grew up surrounded by people who just didn't. Makeup was never portrayed as anything bad or forbidden (and I don't see it like that either)--it was just this thing that, for me growing up, was never made to be a necessity not even for special occasions. I saw airbrushed photos and magazines all around me, for sure, and I definitely felt the beauty pressure and the body pressure (for example, I definitely felt my confidence would be better if I wore concealer to deal with my uneven skintone, and I felt this for years). But I also know that, growing up, I saw both sides. No makeup was the default I saw at home, while makeup was the default I saw outside. And that does play a part, not just in the choices you make, but in the choices that you feel you are allowed to make. No makeup was an option for me because it was what I saw everyday, even with my own insecurities; but if you do not see that as an option around you (and I know for most girls my age, where I grew up, it probably wasn't) then how can we fully argue that the decision you make is a real choice?

If I wanted to wear a cute skirt outside, for example, and decided to shave my legs--that isn't a real choice. And it cannot ever be a real choice, no matter how much I say "this is for me" or "I prefer it like this" because going out in public with hairy legs and going out in public with shaved legs will cause two completely different reactions. How can I separate what I think is "my choice" from a choice I make because I want to avoid the negative looks and comments? And how can I argue that choosing to shave is a freely made choice when the alternative has such negativity? If you feel pressured into choosing one thing over another, that's not a choice. Does this make sense?

This is how I feel about makeup most of the time, and what I want more than anything else is for us to be able to have a conversation about why we make the choices we do beyond saying "it makes me feel good" and ending the conversation there. Again, I'm not saying people need to stop wearing makeup or stop finding enjoyment in wearing it, but I think we tend to get so focused on our own feelings about this and forget that there is a bigger picture and this picture is a deeply unequal one. That is what this conversation is about. I hope this explains some things, anon, and if I misinterpreted anything please feel free to message me again. x

[mintowls]

everyday at work i hear something that makes me want to strangle rich people even more

[edwardratcliffegarthrussellevans]

Not sure if this is just a momentary lapse of faith but I'm starting to feel like maybe entertainment design and illustration really isn't for me in the long run compared to museum and archival studies

[13thpythagoras]

[parviocula]

Getting my high nostrils done next month and who would of thought this man inspired me to get all my piercings I have now.

[frank-olivier]

The Unseen Driver: Merck KGaA’s Behind-the-Scenes Impact on the Semiconductor World

Merck KGaA, a venerable company with a history spanning over 350 years, occupies a critical position in the semiconductor industry through its Electronics Business, led by CEO Kai Beckmann. With a background in Computer Science and Microelectronics, Beckmann's over 35 years of leadership within the company have equipped him with a deep understanding of the industry's intricacies. Merck KGaA's role in providing specialized materials and technologies for semiconductor manufacturing is foundational, supporting all top 100 semiconductor companies, including those with fabrication plants and fabless entities, as well as tool companies offering integrated solutions.

The company's contributions are not merely supplementary but constitute the building blocks of semiconductor architecture, including crucial layers on silicon substrates for insulation, conduction, and more. This multifaceted support underscores Merck KGaA's indispensable position in the industry. The current AI-driven surge in demand for sophisticated chips, particularly evident in data center applications and the training of large language models, has significantly boosted the company's growth trajectory. As AI's influence expands beyond data centers to edge devices, such as smartphones, in the form of Edge AI, the demand for Merck KGaA's advanced materials and technologies is expected to escalate further.

Navigating the semiconductor industry's complex dynamics, characterized by a historically cyclical nature now complicated by asynchronous technology cycles, requires foresight and adaptability. Merck KGaA is well-positioned to meet these challenges, leveraging its extensive experience and commitment to innovation. The integration of AI into material science, to accelerate the discovery of new materials, exemplifies the company's proactive approach. This strategic deployment of AI, both as a driver of demand and a tool for innovation, highlights Merck KGaA's pivotal role in shaping the industry's future.

As the industry evolves, with Edge AI poised to potentially redefine production and research paradigms, Merck KGaA's expertise will be crucial in addressing the heightened need for sophisticated materials. The company's ability to balance the stability afforded by its 70% family ownership with the agility of a publicly traded entity, listed on the German DAX index, further enhances its capacity to respond effectively to emerging trends. Through its innovative spirit, deep industry knowledge, and strategic adaptability, Merck KGaA is not only navigating the transformative impact of AI on the semiconductor industry but also playing a defining role in its future trajectory.

Kai Beckmann: Why Next-Gen Chips Are Critical for AI's Future (Eye on AI, December 2024)

Thursday, December 5, 2024

[selfchiller]

While I'm on the subject of the zoo industry it's pretty interesting to me that when I interned at the one unionized institution I've encountered, most of the (husbandry) staff that I met disliked it and considered it a great inconvenience.

[openeyesproject]

Contributor Applications Open!!

Contributor applications for The Open Eyes Project, a Troubled Teen Industry awareness zine, are now open! We're looking for both writers and artists who are survivors of the Troubled Teen Industry to contribute to our cause. Our goal is to uplift survivor voices by allowing them to share their stories in a fun and creative way, and proceeds from the zine will be donated to charities such as Unsilenced, The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, and The Trevor Project.

Applications will be open for the entire month of May, and final response emails will be sent out by the first week of June at the latest!

💜 WRITER & ARTIST APPLICATION 💜

💜 CARRD 💜

That's all! Thank you for reading, and please feel free to send in any questions you may have!

( Reblogs are greatly appreciated! @zine-scene @zineapps @all-zine-apps @zinecenter @fandomzines @anizines @zineforall @zinesubmissions )