#i endorse the thought

[rosemarytrash]

someone said ftm crocker and i

[meshimellow]

jimmy jimmy cocoa puff jimmy jimmy ride jimmy jimmy cocoa puff jimmy get me highh

[terra-feminarum]

A 19 year old woman stabbed a 40 year old man during sex. They had known each other for a week. The woman admits having planned the stabbing the whole time.

She told the court she had waited for a long time she would meet a man who exploits young women so she could kill him. She declared she didn't want such men to exist.

She had planned her actions beforehand and during sex she grabbed a knife she had hidden previously and slashed the man's throat and then stabbed him.

The man survived and has told the press this experience destroyed his life. He is now afraid to date anyone and is too afraid to return to his home because the woman knows his address.

Rough translation from Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sanomat.

[luigifan1998]

here's an ask for you :)

luigi teaching you how to cook his favorite italian dish! it'd be super cute and romantic and he'd do that little lip pout thing he does because he's so focused

ahhhh this is so cute. love that my first ask wasnt about hardcore nasty sex LOL

he would absolutely be the one to gather everything the recipe requires. it matters to him to get ingredients that only he would know of, things that hes seen in his mother and grandmothers cupboards since childhood. things he has to go to hole-in-the-wall stores for, with shopkeepers hes familiar with. employees that greet him by name and ask how hes doing, how his family is doing. to him, this is part of the love that goes into making a nurturing meal

thinking about his little pout is killing me im going to squish his cheeks telekinetically through the concrete and steal bars wahhhhh but he wouldnt even know how often he does actually pout, soft lips falling downward at the corners, making him resemble that boy in the photos lining his parents foyer as opposed to the ones youd find on his many, many friends social media pages. you wouldnt even want to tell him about his proclivity for the childlike habit because that could interfere with how often he allows you to witness him at ease. he does it in his sleep too, though only when hes exhausted which is more often than not

he would get carried away in explaining the methods hes using to make the pasta itself, the sauce, all while talking about the women in his family with a reverence that would make you feel like hiding behind your hair. slipping into aphorisms and using lovely words in a language you cannot understand. his tanned fingers look softer as they work dough than when hes with the more unforgiving materials he is usually surrounded by. you'd call his hands beautiful while leaning too far over the counter, studying him in opposition to what hes trying to teach you. he would get so flustered, so boyish, unable to make eye contact. he'd just smile and shake his head before sliding behind you to guide you into understanding what he wants you to know. he doesnt have to try to be romantic, he simply is

also im impossibly upset over his selective shyness. one trillion heart breaking emojis

[a-very-tired-jew]

Thank you again for putting anon on for me so I could send this. I didn’t want the harassment that would happen otherwise if I put it on main.

So I am the person that sent STA the call out ask that got Cecil/Spot harassed. I felt bad about it and sent a follow-up ask a few days later to STA to say so.

I said that I was a non-Zionist Jew who had been following this whole thing since STA made their first blog months ago, the contradictions in their posts, and the hard and fast change they did.

STA never published it.

I waited a week or so and sent another one and STA still didn’t respond.

They instead doubled down on their tete-a-tete with Spot. It’s almost obsessive that they think any and all negative asks are from them.

I will admit in my follow-ups I did say that it doesn’t matter if they, STA, don’t consider themselves antisemitic, the people they are friends with are. The blogs that they reshare from and interact with are some of the most antisemitic blogs on this site. Many of them are well known tankies and there’s no denying their antisemitism, it’s been well established. Many of their “friends” on here have a long history of harassing Jews. There is a history of them going into the jumblr tag and Jewish communities and harassing Jews. It’s well documented and their past actions speak for themselves.

I’ve even seen everyone’s favorite Jew hater Spaceship, aka Trudge, as a frequent flyer on their blog.

I will also admit that I put in there that I remember when they tried to present as an Israeli and got caught using a translator to speak Hebrew. That they changed their story to being an Israeli living in CT, and then when that didn’t work out, they arrived at their current iteration of an ethnic Jew living in CT. I don’t believe them to be any of what they claim for a second. The whole debacle of them pretending and getting caught shows that they’ll lie and obfuscate for their goal(s).

But STA won’t share an ask that outs them, lists their past actions, or clears the air regarding Spot and them. They also won’t post anything that calls out their fanbase and friends. They’ve made a name as the token anti-Zionist Jew in their antisemitic clique and had a post about how they won’t address any other form of antisemitism except their Zionism=antisemitism position.

I did also send another ask to them to clarify what a pogrom actually is since they denied that Amsterdam was one. It’s like your artist friend, they don’t actually have an answer and instead will either delete or ignore any asks that want them to clarify their positions.

Since I sent that ask and looked at their blog, I noticed that they really only respond to certain types of anons. They are either praising them, are extremely negative and attack-y so as to bang the “look at how bad the anti-Zionists are!” drum, taken out of context screenshots, or simple enough that they can dismiss the claims with their talking points and sources that agree with their bias.

You’ll notice any ask they get that is trying to address antisemitism that is within the anti-Zionist movement is extremely short and not exactly well thought out. You’ll see ones that are full of insults and curse words attacking them that STA gets to point to and go “see how bad the Zionists are?!”.

You know I’m not a conspiracy theorist or one to jump to conclusions, our work does not endorse that kind of thinking, but it does seem suspicious that those are the only ones they will respond to.

And their friends and followers eat it up. STA, IMO, is disingenuous in their intent and their actions, and is a really bad representation of an anti-Zionist Jew in all respects. If they are one at all.

An IRL friend asked me to throw anon on so they could post this. I only throw anon on for folks I know or ones who ask me to do so. They didn't want to send it to Spot, vents, or anyone else since they, you know, actually know me.

I've had STA blocked for a long ass time so I haven't seen this pattern of only responding to certain types of anons. But taking a quick look? Yeah, seems like it.

Who knows, maybe they will actually post them now?

I doubt it (and they were likely deleted, but who knows?). And we're all very well aware of their social circle. It's a who's who of antisemites that they turn a blind eye to because they're all "anti-Zionists". It's old hat at this point, but I thought my friend added some insight into some of the shit going on.

Unfortunately they've recently broken containment and I've seen their shit across my dash. I saw that they went after applesauce a few days ago, took a screenshot out of context, and them and their followers harassed applesauce even after there was a clarification and correction regarding the post. Targeting a Jew over an out of context screenshot is antisemitic harassment, plain and simple. They keep saying that they were going after a Nazi apologist, then why not show the entire thread where applesauce clarified and apologized for what they said? Why show the singular post out of context unless the point was to harass a Jew you inherently didn't agree with because suddenly their words didn't convey what they were actually trying to say in a singular occurrence?

But they definitely fight antisemitism right?

They're also going after transmascpetewentz because they have the "audacity" to actually take into account the full context of what applesauce said and clarified. We all know what went down, what they were saying, and what they had to clarify. To which that entire thread had apologies and clarification as we would expect.

But again, we're talking about an account that rabidly goes after Zionists, or those they've labeled Zionists, and gets their followers to harass them. We're talking about an account that has only focused on "Zionism = antisemitism" and done everything it could to push the "Zionists = Nazi" narrative in some way or another.

They're definitely stopping antisemitism though.

I also saw their stuff going after cree-n-jewish (because once containment is broken it seems like the algorithm likes to keep it broken) and I can't help but shake my head at the hypocrisy. An outgroup person going after an in-group minority member by finding members of the larger minority group who agree with them. It's disingenuous at best and reminds me of all the times we had to combat anti-science misinformation online and people would be like "Well I found this one group of doctors who agrees with me so I'm right" when talking about vaccines or the 3 out of 97 scientists who disagree with climate change.

I have a pet hypothesis that they're not Jewish at all, but actually a goy who made a fake account and pretended to be their concept of Zionist all those months ago. The likely intent was to post what they thought Zionists would post and get people to agree with it. Then they'd turn around and go "See! Look how evil they are!" and have screenshots as "proof". Problem is their concept of Zionism was actually Kahanism, everyone called them out for it, as well as called them out for their ever changing origin story (Israeli to Israeli ex-pat to Jew in CT, which was fun to watch them backtrack and retcon).

Then suddenly overnight they became a raging anti-Zionist that fully embraced antisemitic rhetoric and has continuously justified it "as a Jew"? Yeah, something is off there.

There was absolutely no "hey, I'm reading these books or writings that stand opposed to Zionism and I'd like to talk about them with the greater Jewish community". There was no discussion on the subject at all. It was a sudden about face that was entirely outside of the norm, and if you know anything about our people and culture it's that we like to talk and discuss things ad nauseum amongst ourselves. The fact that there was nothing like that and their journey from Kahanist to anti-Zionist happened overnight is extremely out of the norm. Especially as they went from posting Kahanist shit to raging antisemitism and justifying violent terrorism in the blink of an eye (part of why they got their first account nuked).

So yeah, all of that plus the refusal to post your anons to them (even the ones asking for clarification and explanation) and other patterns of behavior leads me to my conclusions about them.

[artbyblastweave]

Many years ago J. Michael Straczynski wrote a miniseries for Marvel's MAX imprint called Supreme Power, which was itself a spin on the classic Marvel Faux Justice League The Squadron Supreme. And in this miniseries you've got a Flash Expy, The Blur, who in a very compelling way is like the inverse of A-train from The Boys. They're both black speedsters from impoverished backgrounds who use their powers to become walking billboards instead of going directly into conventional superheroism- at least in part because there isn't actually a lot of call for conventional superheroism. They even share a color scheme.

But unlike A-Train, whose moral core is thoroughly corroded by celebrity, Blur's apparent crass commercialism ends up being thematically linked to the fact that he's easily the most moral and considerate of the entire first wave of superheroes, because he's literally the only one of these people who's ever had to work any kind of day job, and thus the only one who's really in any way beholden to the logic of human society and its associated common courtesy.

[akumahoshojo]

descriptions from the Rondo of Blood manual's unofficial English translation

[mlobsters]

severance s1e8 what's for dinner?

man, what is going on at waffle house these days

[malscare]

Heyyyy I literally don't care enough to get into a whole thing about (hence, anon) but since you have like pronouns in bio and stuff I'm guessing you're probably not down with the many hateful bigoted right wing people jeremy fragrance has consorted with in the past. I'm sorry I know this is like an annoying ask to get but like I keep seeing people post him like he's a harmless little funny boy but he literally makes my nape hair stand on end like literally a fell wind blows on the horizon when I see him. I have prophetic powers btw so basically I'm pretty sure there will be some kind of dark cataclysm related to his activities. I actually had this sense from before I even knew he was rubbing cocks with right wing nutjobs like I kept getting these visions of him in a misty grove of pine trees surrounded by women wearing white robes and they stepped forward one by one and stabbed him with knives carved from the jaw bone of a giant megalithic carnivore. Anyway have a Gouda day ✌️🧀

what if in my vision he was mommy's perfect little pogchamp princess

[mokeonn]

I fucking love sowing it's so rad I hope I don't have to reap this later

[ingravinoveritas]

So, in honor of David hosting the BAFTAs this year, The Guardian is soliciting questions for him to answer, and I just needed to share a selection of them...

(Sharing this last one only because the secondhand embarrassment is so strong, and why would you even ask David this. Also agreeing with someone else who said this question is so clearly made for Michael Sheen...)

[incorrect-hs-quotes]

GT: Roxy.

TG: ya?

GT: Roxy have you been stealing my estrogen?

TG: .

GT: Roxy where is my estrogen.

TG: ..

GT: Roxy.

TG: im the girliepop now, english

TG: ur x chromeosoms are mine

[andichoseyou]

im heartbroken. all positivity has left me. im just so full of disappointment. disappointment in those who deliberately chose not to vote, who decided to vote third party, and especially in those who voted for the convicted felon. disappointed in this country. disappointed by the people around me. disappointed in myself. nothing seems okay right now. this guilt and anger i'm feeling is all consuming. i'm hoping to feel a bit more hopeful in the morning. i want to say that we will be okay, that everything will turn out alright. but i can't. not yet.

[florallylly]

im sorry but eddie munson ur not allowed to EVER be mean to steve harrington's face. ur ass talks a big game behind his back but be so fr u dropped ur pants once u got within 3 ft of him

[devilledminion]

WHAT WE DO IN THE SHADOWS (2019) | 5.03 (Pride Parade)

[artbyblastweave]

So, something I heard pointed out: Both Marvel and DC, ESPECIALLY the latter love the idea of "legacy heroes". Superheroic identities that are passed on from one person to another, like the many different Robins, Flashes, Spider-Men, ETC. But I think there's a notable lack of superVILLAIN legacies. Am I just looking in the wrong places or is that a real trend and, if so, why, do you think?

Legacy Villains are definitely a thing, albeit to a lesser degree than Legacy Heroes.. At DC there have been at least three Clayfaces and two Captain Boomerangs. At Marvel there have been at least two Beetles, two Electros, at least one would-be successor to Doctor Octopus in the form of Lady Octopus, a slew of goblins (hob or otherwise) Bullseye and Lady Bullseye, three Razor Fists, multiple Titanium men. Actually, according to TvTropes almost every Spider-Man villain you'd recognize has gotten an understudy at least once. This isn't exhaustive by any means but I'm not transcribing everyone I dug up on the TVtropes page for Legacy Character when I can just link the fucking thing. So it's pretty common, but it doesn't hit the same in the popular consciousness- you didn't have it as part of your internal map of the dynamic- because these villains don't headline. At least, they don't do this with the ones who headline. There isn't some critical mass of people who are superfans enough of Max Dillon or Mac Gargan for it to be parade-worthy when they swap them out for some new guy. When they killed Captain America during Civil War, that got in the news. The real life, dead-tree newspaper ran articles about that, because apparently nobody told them how death works in comic books. But do you think any newspaper ran an article when they killed Hobgoblin? I don't even know if they actually killed Hobgoblin or not, I'm just assuming that they must have killed at least one because TvTropes lists about. five or six hobgoblins