#i do not care lololol

[farmersfieldwolf]

To Don A Magnificent Crown

it's fox tiiiime babeeee

[t-w-i-l-l-e-r]

do u see my vision.

[mblue-art]

uweurgh///

[bunvehs]

been trying to *properly* get into the self ship community for over a year now and it’s just hit after hit

[parcai]

i b saying things like socially liberal, fiscally conservative just 2 fuck w ppl

[dotthings]

.

[saraminia]

Top 12 Favorite Albums Released in 2024

Cowboy Carter • Beyoncé

Samurai • Lupe Fiasco

In Search of the Antidote • Fletcher

Vertigo • Griff

Dopamine • Normani

Room Under the Stairs • Zayn

Alligator Bites Never Heal • Doechii

Chromacopia • Tyler The Creator

Megan • Megan Thee Stallion

Den jag kunde blivit - Den jag blev • Melissa Horn

Big Sigh • Marika Hackman

GNX • Kendrick Lamar

[iceeericeee]

I wonder how many tags i can add on to this

[elegyofthemoon]

kicking and screaming FREE ME ALREADY

[marcmorrigan]

i rlly cannot express enough how much love i have for the death note fandom... im fairly new to it obviously but everyone has been SO NICE ABOUT MY ART OH MY GOSH. ive been in a lot of fandoms where ppl were sweet abt my work, but the level of interaction and enthusiasm i have gotten since starting to draw death note art has been like incomparable tbh... i am always so excited when yall leave nice tags and stuff bc they ARE always SO nice

[aberooski]

Episode 41: A Reason to Win is my favorite Alexis-centric episode and one of my favorite episodes in the show I'm really excited to watch it again 😊

[kristsune]

Well friends, I’m back at it with yet another Alex cosplay, because I simply couldn’t help myself. This one is modeled after the second tma2 kickstarter stream.

[copiousloverofcopia]

How I'm sleeping tonight knowing I just got some "quality" time with the husband.

Inspo for fics 😅

[baejax-the-great]

So much of internet culture today boils down to, well if i can't make fun of that group, who can I make fun of (or harass or bully or mock)?

I don't think antis resulted only from purity culture--I think the human desire to spew vitriol and the ever-shrinking number of "morally acceptable" targets brings in recruits as much as anything. You can say whatever you want to a "pedophile" and it's morally justified.

It's one of the reasons leftists have clung so hard to mocking fat people. It's why people say, okay, you can't make fun of autistic people anymore, but I can make fun of people who aren't autistic but who have these traits that are associated with autism. Or why people obsess over others faking their illnesses so that they can trash them online. Or why there are seemingly more posts shitting on terfs than supporting trans people.

It's a natural mammalian urge to want to lash out at others, particularly others seen as having less social standing/power. I just wish people would think harder about why they want a "safe" category of people they can trash consequence- and guilt-free.

[skinsort]

Hello, I've been thinking about code and selling code and sharing code in the rpc because someone posed the question to me of what I'd want to happen if someone was heavily editing a skin I sold, and to be honest, my first instinct was 'take my name off it'. That was met with some surprise, but let me explain why.

Code, to me, is a largely democratic landscape. If you want to learn, hundreds of thousands of people and websites have come together to teach you. Masses of people share open source work on codepen, stack overflow etc. Code as a skill is like assembling an especially abstract puzzle where you can only think about the pieces, not really see them. But most puzzles have similar strategies to solve- start with the corner pieces, then the edges, then the most recognizable patterns etc etc etc working your way down to the more and more difficult details. Most of code- most of my job writing code- involves minimizing the amount of time working on those shared strategies so we can have more time to work on the the interesting bits, the hard bits. the bits that make the site we're working on unique and useful. Frankly, jcink is the easy part of code, by and large. Your data is already structured and provided to you in a very particular way. It is inefficiently, but largely documented. Many other people have solved all the problems you are likely to have trying to build a skin. Skinning is html and css for the vast majority of items. It is the easy stuff. If I sell code, that code is now the property of the person I sold it to. It is not shareable or redistributable. You can't take my code and resell it as your own, but as far as I'm concerned you can do whatever you want with it. If I solved problems that might otherwise feel difficult (accessibility and responsiveness come to mind) cool. You can solve the easy ones, like styling and colors and fonts you like. You can add or subtract things that vibe with what you want that code to do. Once it is sold, it is yours to do with what you like when it comes to personal use. This is true of almost all coding contracts that exist in the entire world. If it weren't, no one would ever hire external contractors to do any work for their company, and I can tell you now, even companies which could fully afford to do all their tech in house absolutely do not in 99% of cases if their business isn't selling their own tech. The rule is generally- you may do anything you like with this, except resell it to someone else. So why take my name off it? I don't endorse how other people code. Even in my professional life, I've taken projects off my portfolio because the client took a project I worked on and broke it (imo), often with other professional developers doing the breaking. If a prospective employer were to go look at it, I'd be embarrassed by what it looks like today. Tell me why I (and my team) created a website that was fully responsive, and they went back to make it adaptive in the year of our lord 2022 because they preferred to have pixel perfect views at 3 specific breakpoints rather than a responsive site. I don't know, it's infuriating. I can't cite that project as an example of my work anymore, because it isn't. I would never leave a site in that state.

So, my first instinct with the idea of people using a skin i sell them as a base is 'take my name off it.' I don't want to be associated if responsive/accessible features are lost due to others working on a skin I wrote. But at the same time, where is the line between using something as a base, and editing a few small features? I certainly don't want to be an arbiter of that, or have to field questions or navigate feelings about it. In fact, personally I would not feel upset at all if someone used a paid for skin as a base, and inviting that kind of discussion is the only way I possibly could get upset since people have weird attitudes about a lot of this stuff. So I think the more practical standard is just to put credit, but make it explicit that the work has been heavily altered. Don't resell or redistribute, and you're golden, imo. Anyway, those are my feelings as someone who writes code for a living. I'm interested to hear counterpoints - constructively of course.

[muirneach]

since everyones sharing family cheating stories i was gonna say i dont know any cheating incidents in my family but actually my great great aunt owned a pub in dublin and her husband was, forgive me for saying this, a malewife but also he would cheat on her all the time. she knew btw she just didn’t give a shit because she was busy running that pub like the navy. when my grandmother took the train down to see them as a kid her uncle would take her to the mistresses house for tea first 😭😭