#human osteology
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
er-cryptid · 11 months ago
Text
The hyoid bone is the only bone not attached to another bone.
17 notes · View notes
bonewraith · 2 months ago
Text
i was not made to sit in a vape shop for 6-7 hours a day being incredibly bored and understimulated.
i was made to work in a zooarchaeology and/or osteology lab at a university where i don't have to worry about being bored or over/understimulated or dealing with customers. can someone Please give me a pile of bones and pay me to catalog them. and/or money for grad school
2 notes · View notes
ingloriousgigi · 2 years ago
Note
It is so interesting to hear from someone who has expertise in this field. I often get frustrated by news articles who cherry pick findings and then slap a gender on the remains of a historical figure. In hindsight, I should have been more clear on my frustrations. But I thank you so much for enlightening me on this subject. I always love to learn new things.
why do you think a lot of historians don't think that alexander (and, by extension, other people in history) was gay? sorry if this is worded strangely by the way
Anon I’m not yelling at you I love you but I have to yell because everyone on tumblr spreads such bad misinformation. NO HISTORIANS THINK ALEXANDER WAS STRAIGHT. NOR ANY OTHER OLD TIME GAYS. LITERALLY NONE. THIS IS A MYTH PERPETUATED ON TUMBLR AND IT ISNT REAL STOP BELIEVING IT IM LOSING MY MIND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Okay. Now that I am. Calm. Sorry. Even tho plenty of historians were homophobic back in like last century — no one currently writing, period — they still could not DENY that Alexander who kept a MALE CONCUBINE , FUCKED MEN. Even the MOST homophobic ones were like “it was his worst vice” but they couldn’t DENY it. NOBODY EVER sorry normal volume nobody ever denied it in the whole history of the world never. Never. No one. That is fake. People who say that do not know what they are talking about.
On the OTHER hand , historians will say that for example Hamilton was “straight” because there IS NO DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE OTHERWISE. no, a few gay letters are not hard evidence. YES, male friendship mores were WAY DIFFERENT in old times, and it’s WAY too much extrapolation to assume from a few gay sounding TO US letters that he was fucking that twink Laurens. That is BAD METHODOLOGY. that is not homophobic it is BAD METHODOLOGY. you cannot publish that kind of thing cuz it’s simply not got enough evidence. I don’t care if they probably were, there is EMPIRICALLY NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE.
Okay. Also. Last point. l hate the misinformation on this hell site. Last point.
Gay and straight were not labels that existed until the late 1800s. Historians do not write about sexuality in terms of gay and straight because gay and straight did not exist as we know them to people prior to the late 1800s. We can only judge how people in history had sex based on their actions. If a historian says Alexander wasn’t gay or bi it isn’t because they’re saying he didn’t fuck men. It’s because they’re saying it’s extremely reductive and bad scholarship to ascribe modern definitions of sexuality and modern sexual mores to the ancient world. When we’re just hanging out and talking one on one or casually, no problem saying gay and straight! It helps us conceptialize how they lived! It’s something we understand. But in a PAPER you are trying to PUBLISH, you CANNOT say that because it misinterprets the workings of their society.
Okay. Thank you. I hope this clears things up for every dumbass who makes those posts and misinforms my innocent fellow classics people who are new and do not know. I hate y’all. Not you anon. Y’all who peddle this ….. homophobia nonsense. Stop it
3K notes · View notes
therandomfandomme · 6 months ago
Text
Just saw this poll and as an archaeologist I've touched some old shit, but I've also held human remains and I only just now realized that might not be common so:
(im thinking urn doesn't count, sticking your hand in the ashes does)
25 notes · View notes
et-excrucior · 7 months ago
Text
So I’m going to highlight something I’m not sure people who like skeletons and curiosities think about often:
the human skeletal remains you see for sale in oddities shops were invariably grave-robbed.
I worked with human remains in an academic research context in the US for more than a decade. One of the first things I tried to teach my students was respect for the remains in our collections, not only because they were people, deserving of dignity in their death, but also because most of the skeletal remains in academic teaching collections were not donated voluntarily. In most cases, we have no idea exactly where they came from or to whom they belonged.
Historically, there has been a huge international trade in human skeletal remains for teaching medical students. The trade reached its peak in the 19th Century and continued for much of the 20th, and while ostensibly the practice was banned in India in 1985, it does still exist illegally. In the US and Europe, most of the remains in teaching collections were sourced from India through bone traders. Bone traders were (are) lower caste people charged with disposing of human remains—often by cremation, but also by interring in graves—but instead of doing so, sold the remains on to medical schools in the US/Europe through the intermediary of anatomical and medical supply companies. These anatomical specimens are the remains of people who were, unknowingly and without consent of their loved ones, denied their humanity in death to satisfy the appetite of the West for anatomical specimens, despite the remains of their own people being considered largely sacrosanct.
Which leads me to my next point: this practice originated under British Colonialism in India. I hope I don’t need to draw this point out, but objectification of these remains by medical students and researchers is a furtherance of the Western colonial project and othering of people of colour. As medical students, we’re trained to divorce ourselves emotionally from the remains we learn from in the name of professionalism. Medicine can often be confronting, and it serves patients and doctors alike to be able to continue working calmly and objectively in the face of those challenges. But in a world where empires and scientific disciplines have been (and continue to be) built on a legacy of scientific racism and dehumanisation, it behooves us to consider exactly how those teaching specimens were acquired—and how they came to be for sale.
Any human skeleton or human bones you see for sale in oddity stores are invariably retired teaching specimens, or were otherwise originally purchased through an anatomical specimen supply company that leveraged bone traders for acquiring their wares. In other words, those remains were grave-robbed, or stolen from funeral pyres and morgues. It is vanishingly unlikely that they are remains of known, ethically-sourced provenance like informed donation. If they were, they would not have been relinquished to the general public to be sold for profit. There would be contractual obligations that dictate how those remains would be managed once they need to be retired from teaching/decommissioned.
Please keep this in mind when you see human remains for sale in oddity shops. Buy plastic or ceramic teaching models instead. Don’t unwittingly continue creating a market for stolen human remains.
8 notes · View notes
bambithearchaeologist · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Love being an archaeologist
31 notes · View notes
fixomnia-scribble · 1 year ago
Text
*supersonic shrieking*
3 notes · View notes
vijayadworld · 10 months ago
Text
Human Osteology Introduction
2 notes · View notes
aberghdesigns · 2 years ago
Text
Skulls and Bones Procreate Brush Set - 34 Pieces
34 piece Skulls & Bones Procreate Stamp Set! Use alone or with my other stamp sets to create unique illustrations and compositions! I use my stamp packs to build the bases of my illustrations and the tattoo designs I create.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Set includes both human and animal skull stamps drawn from osteological references.
Skulls include:
8 Human skulls
1 Owl skull
1 Eagle skull
2 Canid (dog) skulls
4 Feline (cat) skulls
2 Deer skulls
1 Double Headed Calf Skull
1 Steer Skull
1 Ram Skull (not in list above, I just forgot it)
Bones include:
2 Human jaws
2 Human Humerus (thigh bones)
2 Human hands
1 Human pelvis
2 Human vertebra variations
2 Human vertebra types
2 Antler variations
These stamps can be used for personal or commercial purposes, however any piece of this set, or this set as a whole, cannot be shared, duplicated, or redistributed in any way.
Set comes as single procreate brush file for download immediately after purchase.
Due to the digital nature of this product, no returns or refunds will be accepted or issued, respectively.
Happy Creating!
PRODUCT LINK: https://alexisbergh.gumroad.com/l/skullsandbones
8 notes · View notes
exactlysizzlingdonut · 1 year ago
Text
guys I’m taking human anatomy rn I feel so Dr Tenma 😆😆
jokes aside tho it’s so fucking cool… legit resurfaced my hyper fixation on the skeletal system bc I LOVE BONES! YEAH!
2 notes · View notes
er-cryptid · 6 months ago
Text
Osteology
Tumblr media
Patreon
6 notes · View notes
thedustycat · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I took a short break from social media for my mental health, but I'm looking at $4k worth of medical bills so I'm going to start dipping into my collection and posting items for sale to help with that. Just in time for early Holiday shopping if you have friends or family with good taste 😀
Starting off with a loose collection of 13 foot bones and a loose collection of 10 vertebrae.
Neither set appears to be from a single respective specimen.
Foot bones - $250 shipped Vertebrae - $280 shipped
DM if interested.
Sales will go through PayPal. U.S. only. Absolutely no sales to TN, LA, GA.
0 notes
lovelyisadora · 2 years ago
Text
my prof just gave me a free physical anthropology textbook that isn’t for her class, and since it’s one I think I already own i might use it to collage…is that unethical idk I want the monkey pictures
1 note · View note
boirad · 5 months ago
Text
Honestly it’s one of the most fascinating things in the human body to me! Both teeth and bone are made of the same material, an inorganic hydroxyapatite matrix interspersed with an organic collagen/protein component, however bones are made up of ~65% inorganic matrix, while teeth are sitting at ~95% inorganic matrix. Like what happens if those ratios are messed with and at what point do we lose the ability to repair? At what point in evolutionary history did these ratios become the dominant trait? Idk the human body is SO COOL in how it works and I’m always mesmerized by the perfect set of circumstances that occurred to result in our bodies functioning the way that they do!
Sincerely, a biological anthropologist <3
Teeth weak as fuck why can't you be like bones
84K notes · View notes
lexa-griffins · 2 years ago
Text
Human Osteology manuals are like: give us 100€ for a book or buy the ones from the 19th century for 20€ with incorrect info we refuse to edit
1 note · View note
er-cryptid · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Patreon
6 notes · View notes