#galwan

[shuksrp]

Only Pirates do this Phillipines to China

[jobaaj]

UPDATE: Is China preparing for another war with India? The US thinks it is!! According to a recent report by the US Pentagon, China has continued to build new roads, helipads, bridges, airports, and even new villages along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India! Moreover, China has also reportedly deployed more troops in the region and the same is expected to continue throughout 2023!!

Read full: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/casakshamagarwal_china-india-lac-activity-7122865677853425664-2bZr?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Follow Jobaaj Stories (the Media arm of Jobaaj.com Group) for more.

[rayhaber]

Çin ve Hindistan Arasındaki Sınır Geriliminde Yeni Gelişmeler

Çin Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü Lin Cien, iki ülkenin 2020 yılındaki anlaşmazlığın ardından gerilimlerin azaltılması yönündeki çabalarının olumlu sonuçlar verdiğini ifade etti. Lin, “İki taraf, ilgili meselelerde anlaşmaya varmıştır” şeklinde bir açıklamada bulundu. Bu açıklama, Çin ve Hindistan’ın diplomatik ve askeri kanallar aracılığıyla uzun süredir sürdürdüğü yakın iletişimin bir yansıması…

[jasminewilson143]

India and China Agree on Disengagement and Patrolling Arrangements Along LAC: A Step Towards Border Stability

India and China Agree on Disengagement and Patrolling Arrangements Along LAC: A Step Towards Border Stability In a significant development in India-China relations, the two nations have reached an agreement to disengage their troops and establish new patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This decision, announced by India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, marks a crucial…

[merisarkar]

India-China Agree to Disengage at Ladakh Border: MEA

India-China Agree to Disengage Troops in Ladakh: In a significant step towards easing tensions along their disputed Himalayan border, India Monday announced on that it has reached a mutual agreement with China to disengage their troops from several friction points in the Ladakh region. The decision, based on a statement made by India’s External Affairs Secretary, Vikram Misri, marks a crucial…

[kimskashmir]

Two incidents of skirmishes between Indian, Chinese troops along LAC come to light

NEW DELHI — At least two previously unknown incidents of skirmishes between the Indian and Chinese troops along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) have come to light with citations for gallantry awards conferred on Indian Army personnel mentioning them. The citations, read out at an investiture ceremony by the Army’s Western Command last week, provided brief details of how the Indian troops…

[kashmirmonitor]

Galwan hero's wife becomes Army officer, posted in Ladakh

New Delhi :Rekha Singh, wife of Naik Deepak Singh who was killed in the Galwan Valley clashes in 2020, has been commissioned into the Indian Army as a Lieutenant, officials said on Saturday.She has been posted to a frontline base along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, they said Lt Singh on Saturday completed her one-year training at the Chennai-based Officers Training Academy…

[theindiantribal]

Sepoy Ganesh Hansda’s life was extinguished too soon, but his story lives on in the hearts of Jharkhand’s tribals. SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA meets the movie crew that intends to tell this soldier’s tale to all Indians,  

Visit now : https://theindiantribal.com/2022/07/28/variety-entertainment-jollywood-film-on-jharkhand-tribal-teen-martyred-at-galwan-set-for-september-release/

[collapsedsquid]

Just found someone referring to a new “wolf’s fang“ mace that China is now developing, seems like we’ve got a full on arms race going on where they can’t use firearms

[beardedmrbean]

India says it has lodged a "strong protest" with China over a new map that lays claim to its territory.

Indian media have reported that the map shows the north-eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh and the disputed Aksai Chin plateau as China's territory.

It was released by China's ministry of natural resources on Monday.

"We reject these claims as they have no basis," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said.

He added that such steps by China "only complicate the resolution of the boundary question".

Beijing has not officially responded yet.

India's Foreign Minister S Jaishankar also called China's claim "absurd".

"China has even in the past put out maps which claim the territories which are not China's, which belong to other countries. This is an old habit of theirs," he told TV channel NDTV on Tuesday.

India's protest comes days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the sidelines of the Brics summit in South Africa. An Indian official said afterwards that the two countries had agreed to "intensify efforts at expeditious disengagement and de-escalation" along the disputed border.

Shadow of 60-year-old war at India-China flashpoint

The Indian monastery town coveted by China

India has often reacted angrily to China's attempts to stake claim to its territory.

The source of the tension between the neighbours is a disputed 3,440km (2,100 mile)-long de facto border along the Himalayas - called the Line of Actual Control, or LAC - which is poorly demarcated. The presence of rivers, lakes and snowcaps means the line can shift in places.

Soldiers on either side come face to face at many points, which can spark tensions - the last time being in December when Indian and Chinese troops clashed along the border in the town of Tawang.

China says it considers the whole of Arunachal Pradesh its territory, calling it "South Tibet" - a claim India firmly rejects. India claims the Aksai Chin plateau in the Himalayas, which is controlled by China.

In April, Delhi reacted sharply to China's attempts to rename 11 places in Arunachal Pradesh, saying the state would always be "an "integral and inalienable part of India".

Relations between India and China have worsened since 2020, when their troops were involved in a deadly clash at the Galwan valley in Ladakh - it was the first fatal confrontation between the two sides since 1975.

[todayworldnews2k21]

Ajit Doval to visit China tomorrow for key talks on LAC border truce: Sources

National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval is scheduled to visit China tomorrow on December 17 to hold Special Representatives (SR) level talks with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, according to a source. The discussions aim to address the long-standing tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This marks the first SR-level dialogue since the Galwan Valley clash in 2020 and the first such…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Ashok Kantha, a retired diplomat and former Indian Ambassador to China, has raised concerns about a recent Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement regarding the India-China border situation. He suggests that the MEA’s readout on the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) meeting contradicts what External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said in Parliament just days earlier. In a multi-part post on X, Kantha has essayed how the Working Mechanism – WMCC – meeting’s official version gives rise to apprehensions of India losing control of the situation at the Line of Actual Control with China in eastern Ladakh. The indented portion’s are Kantha’s posts, edited slightly for clarity. 1/n Intrigued by MEA readout on India-China WMCC: both sides have “positively affirmed” that implementation of disengagement agreement has “completed the resolution of the issues that emerged in 2020”. This contradicts @DrSJaishankar statement in Parliament on 3 Dec. My doubts: pic.twitter.com/o9QKPlyHrm — ashokkantha (@ashokkkantha) December 6, 2024 “Intrigued by [the] MEA readout on India-China WMCC: both sides have “positively affirmed” that implementation of disengagement agreement has “completed the resolution of the issues that emerged in 2020”. This contradicts [S. Jaishankar’s] statement in Parliament on 3 Dec. My doubts: “[Jaishankar] noted that talks will now shift to “de-escalation as well as effective management of our activities in the border areas”, issues which emerged in 2020. There is continuing entrenched deployment of troops with heavy weapons. Does this become “new normal”? In May 2020 a military standoff between the India and Chinese forces led to a June skirmish at Galwan Valley, leading to the deaths of at least 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers. “[Jaishankar] referred to “steps of a temporary and limited nature” in several pockets of Chinese intrusions. This reportedly involves denial of patrolling by Indian troops and grazing by Indian graziers in areas they were accessing until April 2020. Another “new normal”? The foreign minister stated in parliament that the disengagement measures at four friction points were implemented to prevent further friction, describing them as “temporary” and open to being “revisited,” though he did not specify the conditions for such a review. EAM Jaishankar was following up on an announcement by India in October 21, that a “patrolling agreement” had been finalised between the two neighbours. “Army Chief on 23 October: “We want to go back to status quo of April 2020”. Is this requirement of restoration of status quo ante no longer an issue (though stemming from Chinese intrusions of 2020) which remains to be addressed, despite its territorial implications? “This categorical conclusion in MEA statement that “all issues that emerged in 2020” have been resolved is baffling to someone who was a border negotiator with China for nearly a decade. Clearly, I am out of touch with “new normal”. “Finding it difficult to shake off apprehensions that this premature declaration of victory, a la Doklam, will have serious implications. Humble advice: Let SRs address these and other unresolved issues as part of border peace & tranquility mandate given to them at Kazan. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Ashok Kantha, a retired diplomat and former Indian Ambassador to China, has raised concerns about a recent Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement regarding the India-China border situation. He suggests that the MEA’s readout on the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) meeting contradicts what External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said in Parliament just days earlier. In a multi-part post on X, Kantha has essayed how the Working Mechanism – WMCC – meeting’s official version gives rise to apprehensions of India losing control of the situation at the Line of Actual Control with China in eastern Ladakh. The indented portion’s are Kantha’s posts, edited slightly for clarity. 1/n Intrigued by MEA readout on India-China WMCC: both sides have “positively affirmed” that implementation of disengagement agreement has “completed the resolution of the issues that emerged in 2020”. This contradicts @DrSJaishankar statement in Parliament on 3 Dec. My doubts: pic.twitter.com/o9QKPlyHrm — ashokkantha (@ashokkkantha) December 6, 2024 “Intrigued by [the] MEA readout on India-China WMCC: both sides have “positively affirmed” that implementation of disengagement agreement has “completed the resolution of the issues that emerged in 2020”. This contradicts [S. Jaishankar’s] statement in Parliament on 3 Dec. My doubts: “[Jaishankar] noted that talks will now shift to “de-escalation as well as effective management of our activities in the border areas”, issues which emerged in 2020. There is continuing entrenched deployment of troops with heavy weapons. Does this become “new normal”? In May 2020 a military standoff between the India and Chinese forces led to a June skirmish at Galwan Valley, leading to the deaths of at least 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers. “[Jaishankar] referred to “steps of a temporary and limited nature” in several pockets of Chinese intrusions. This reportedly involves denial of patrolling by Indian troops and grazing by Indian graziers in areas they were accessing until April 2020. Another “new normal”? The foreign minister stated in parliament that the disengagement measures at four friction points were implemented to prevent further friction, describing them as “temporary” and open to being “revisited,” though he did not specify the conditions for such a review. EAM Jaishankar was following up on an announcement by India in October 21, that a “patrolling agreement” had been finalised between the two neighbours. “Army Chief on 23 October: “We want to go back to status quo of April 2020”. Is this requirement of restoration of status quo ante no longer an issue (though stemming from Chinese intrusions of 2020) which remains to be addressed, despite its territorial implications? “This categorical conclusion in MEA statement that “all issues that emerged in 2020” have been resolved is baffling to someone who was a border negotiator with China for nearly a decade. Clearly, I am out of touch with “new normal”. “Finding it difficult to shake off apprehensions that this premature declaration of victory, a la Doklam, will have serious implications. Humble advice: Let SRs address these and other unresolved issues as part of border peace & tranquility mandate given to them at Kazan. [ad_2] Source link

[darkmaga-returns]

Ted Snider

Nov 6, 2024

The United States’ struggle to preserve the unipolar world slipped another step back when India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the People’s Republic of China’s President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the 2024 BRICS summit.

India and China’s already strained relationship strained even more in 2020 when 20 Indian troops and four Chinese troops were killed in hand-to-hand combat along their disputed border in the Galwan Valley of the Western Himalayas.

The U.S. has long exploited the animosity between the world’s two largest countries, using India as a counterbalance to China, containing the PRC and driving a wedge between it and the Global South.

In America’s geopolitical battle to maintain a U.S.-led unipolar world over a multipolar system preferred by Russia and China, India is the giant with one foot in each world. The world’s second-largest nation’s choice of sides will determine whether the unipolar world survives or evolution favors multipolarity.

But what the U.S. struggles to see—to the detriment of its own foreign policy and its own self-interest—is that India, and much of the Global South, no longer sees itself as having to make a choice between blocs. The choice of a multipolar world means not having to choose sides. In his book, The India Way, India’s foreign minister, S. Jaishankar, explains that multipolarity means that countries can deal “with contesting parties at the same time with optimal results” for their “own self-interest.” 

[globalresourcesvn]

Airtel mang đến sự kết nối ở Galwan và Daulat Beg Oldie

Airtel đã hợp tác với Quân đội Ấn Độ trong một sáng kiến ​​đột phá nhằm đưa mạng 4G của mình đến một số địa hình xa xôi và đầy thách thức nhất trên thế giới. Điều này bao gồm Galwan và Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO), tiền đồn quân sự ở cực bắc nằm ở thị trấn biên giới, ở độ cao đáng kinh ngạc 16.700 feet so với mực nước biển. Airtel hiện là nhà cung cấp dịch vụ viễn thông tư nhân duy nhất cung cấp dịch…

[the100th-monkey]

Today's News 26th October 2024

The US Was Inadvertently Responsible For The Sino-Indo Border De-Escalation Deal The US Was Inadvertently Responsible For The Sino-Indo Border De-Escalation Deal Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, India announced earlier this week that it and China agreed to patrol their disputed border area in the way that it was before June 2020’s lethal Galwan River Valley clashes. This was made…