#galwan

[shuksrp]

Only Pirates do this Phillipines to China

[jobaaj]

UPDATE: Is China preparing for another war with India? The US thinks it is!! According to a recent report by the US Pentagon, China has continued to build new roads, helipads, bridges, airports, and even new villages along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India! Moreover, China has also reportedly deployed more troops in the region and the same is expected to continue throughout 2023!!

Read full: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/casakshamagarwal_china-india-lac-activity-7122865677853425664-2bZr?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Follow Jobaaj Stories (the Media arm of Jobaaj.com Group) for more.

[rayhaber]

Çin ve Hindistan Arasındaki Sınır Geriliminde Yeni Gelişmeler

Çin Dışişleri Bakanlığı Sözcüsü Lin Cien, iki ülkenin 2020 yılındaki anlaşmazlığın ardından gerilimlerin azaltılması yönündeki çabalarının olumlu sonuçlar verdiğini ifade etti. Lin, “İki taraf, ilgili meselelerde anlaşmaya varmıştır” şeklinde bir açıklamada bulundu. Bu açıklama, Çin ve Hindistan’ın diplomatik ve askeri kanallar aracılığıyla uzun süredir sürdürdüğü yakın iletişimin bir yansıması…

[jasminewilson143]

India and China Agree on Disengagement and Patrolling Arrangements Along LAC: A Step Towards Border Stability

India and China Agree on Disengagement and Patrolling Arrangements Along LAC: A Step Towards Border Stability In a significant development in India-China relations, the two nations have reached an agreement to disengage their troops and establish new patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This decision, announced by India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, marks a crucial…

[merisarkar]

India-China Agree to Disengage at Ladakh Border: MEA

India-China Agree to Disengage Troops in Ladakh: In a significant step towards easing tensions along their disputed Himalayan border, India Monday announced on that it has reached a mutual agreement with China to disengage their troops from several friction points in the Ladakh region. The decision, based on a statement made by India’s External Affairs Secretary, Vikram Misri, marks a crucial…

[kimskashmir]

Two incidents of skirmishes between Indian, Chinese troops along LAC come to light

NEW DELHI — At least two previously unknown incidents of skirmishes between the Indian and Chinese troops along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) have come to light with citations for gallantry awards conferred on Indian Army personnel mentioning them. The citations, read out at an investiture ceremony by the Army’s Western Command last week, provided brief details of how the Indian troops…

[kashmirmonitor]

Galwan hero's wife becomes Army officer, posted in Ladakh

New Delhi :Rekha Singh, wife of Naik Deepak Singh who was killed in the Galwan Valley clashes in 2020, has been commissioned into the Indian Army as a Lieutenant, officials said on Saturday.She has been posted to a frontline base along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, they said Lt Singh on Saturday completed her one-year training at the Chennai-based Officers Training Academy…

[theindiantribal]

Sepoy Ganesh Hansda’s life was extinguished too soon, but his story lives on in the hearts of Jharkhand’s tribals. SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA meets the movie crew that intends to tell this soldier’s tale to all Indians,  

Visit now : https://theindiantribal.com/2022/07/28/variety-entertainment-jollywood-film-on-jharkhand-tribal-teen-martyred-at-galwan-set-for-september-release/

[collapsedsquid]

Just found someone referring to a new “wolf’s fang“ mace that China is now developing, seems like we’ve got a full on arms race going on where they can’t use firearms

[beardedmrbean]

India says it has lodged a "strong protest" with China over a new map that lays claim to its territory.

Indian media have reported that the map shows the north-eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh and the disputed Aksai Chin plateau as China's territory.

It was released by China's ministry of natural resources on Monday.

"We reject these claims as they have no basis," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said.

He added that such steps by China "only complicate the resolution of the boundary question".

Beijing has not officially responded yet.

India's Foreign Minister S Jaishankar also called China's claim "absurd".

"China has even in the past put out maps which claim the territories which are not China's, which belong to other countries. This is an old habit of theirs," he told TV channel NDTV on Tuesday.

India's protest comes days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the sidelines of the Brics summit in South Africa. An Indian official said afterwards that the two countries had agreed to "intensify efforts at expeditious disengagement and de-escalation" along the disputed border.

Shadow of 60-year-old war at India-China flashpoint

The Indian monastery town coveted by China

India has often reacted angrily to China's attempts to stake claim to its territory.

The source of the tension between the neighbours is a disputed 3,440km (2,100 mile)-long de facto border along the Himalayas - called the Line of Actual Control, or LAC - which is poorly demarcated. The presence of rivers, lakes and snowcaps means the line can shift in places.

Soldiers on either side come face to face at many points, which can spark tensions - the last time being in December when Indian and Chinese troops clashed along the border in the town of Tawang.

China says it considers the whole of Arunachal Pradesh its territory, calling it "South Tibet" - a claim India firmly rejects. India claims the Aksai Chin plateau in the Himalayas, which is controlled by China.

In April, Delhi reacted sharply to China's attempts to rename 11 places in Arunachal Pradesh, saying the state would always be "an "integral and inalienable part of India".

Relations between India and China have worsened since 2020, when their troops were involved in a deadly clash at the Galwan valley in Ladakh - it was the first fatal confrontation between the two sides since 1975.

[odnewsin]

Whatever was done in Galwan shouldn’t get repeated: Army chief

Pune: Army Chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi Wednesday said the situation along the northern border is stable but at the same time sensitive, asserting that “whatever was done in Galwan should not get repeated”. He also said that his force is fully ready and capable to deal with any situation. In his address at the 77th Army Day celebrations here, the Army chief underlined that special attention has been…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 6th Jan. In the midst of escalating tensions over China’s new administrative divisions in Aksai Chin, the Congress party has unleashed a barrage of criticism against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, a closer look at history reveals the irony of this blame game: much of the territorial loss that Congress now decries occurred during the tenure of its own leader, Jawaharlal Nehru. The recent announcement of “He’an County” and “Hekang County” by China is merely the latest chapter in a story that began with diplomatic failures and strategic miscalculations under Nehru’s leadership. This political blame-shifting raises important questions about accountability, historical legacy, and the politicization of national security issues. While it is easy for the Congress to point fingers at the present government, its criticism risks exposing the cracks in its own historical record. Understanding China’s Move: The Aksai Chin Context China’s creation of He’an County and Hekang County in the disputed Aksai Chin region has once again drawn global attention to the unresolved territorial disputes between Bharat and China. The announcement underscores China’s intent to consolidate its hold over the region, which has been under its control since the 1960s. He’an County, in particular, holds strategic importance for China due to the G219 Highway, a key supply route connecting Xinjiang and Tibet. This highway was constructed by China between 1956 and 1957, and its existence was formally acknowledged in the Bharatiya Parliament by then-Prime Minister Nehru in 1959. Despite clear evidence of Chinese advances in the region, Nehru’s government failed to take decisive action to reclaim the territory, allowing China to solidify its position. Nehru’s Himalayan Blunders: A History of Strategic Failures The Congress’s current critique of PM Modi ignores the inconvenient truth of its own legacy. Key areas of Aksai Chin, now part of He’an County, were occupied during Nehru’s tenure as Prime Minister. This includes strategic locations like: Haji Langar, seized by China in 1959, following an incident in 1958 where an Bharatiya patrol was detained. Qizil Jilga, captured during the 1962 Sino-Indian War. Chung Tash, another casualty of the 1962 conflict. Dehra Compas, taken over in 1961, marking yet another failure to secure Bharatiya territory. Shamal Lungpa, occupied in 1959, where a Bharatiya patrol was attacked by Chinese forces. These losses were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of Nehru’s diplomatic and strategic missteps. Despite early warnings about Chinese intentions, Nehru’s “Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai” policy prioritized diplomatic appeasement over military preparedness, leaving Bharat vulnerable to Chinese aggression. The Politicization of National Security The Congress party’s attempt to pin the blame for China’s actions on PM Modi reflects a worrying trend in Bharatiya politics: the politicization of national security. By ignoring the historical context of Aksai Chin’s annexation and focusing solely on current developments, Congress undermines the unity required to address such challenges. The Modi government, for its part, has taken a firm stance on China’s provocations. From the 2020 Galwan clash to the current diplomatic protests against China’s administrative changes, the government has demonstrated a commitment to safeguarding Bharat’s territorial integrity. The construction of border infrastructure, bolstered troop deployment, and increased surveillance in the region are steps that reflect a proactive approach—far removed from the inaction that characterized Nehru’s tenure. A Lesson in Accountability The Congress’s criticism of PM Modi over Aksai Chin exposes its selective memory and political opportunism. While it is fair to scrutinize the actions of the present government, doing so without acknowledging the historical context erodes credibility. The party’s failure to accept

responsibility for Nehru’s missteps suggests a lack of introspection and an unwillingness to engage in constructive dialogue on national security. For voters, this episode serves as a reminder of the importance of historical awareness in political discourse. Bharat’s territorial disputes with China are not the result of recent developments but decades of strategic miscalculations. Addressing them requires unity, vision, and a commitment to learning from the past—qualities that must transcend party politics. Conclusion: Moving Beyond Blame The Chinese government’s establishment of He’an County and Hekang County is a provocative move that underscores the ongoing challenges Bharat faces in securing its borders. However, the Congress’s attempt to blame PM Modi for these developments rings hollow in light of Nehru’s legacy of inaction in Aksai Chin. Bharat’s political leadership, irrespective of party lines, must prioritize national security over partisan attacks. As the Modi government continues to navigate these challenges, it is incumbent upon all political actors to support policies that strengthen Bharat’s territorial integrity and bolster its strategic position. Ultimately, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty demands accountability not only for present actions but also for historical decisions. Only by acknowledging the full scope of its past can Bharat chart a course for a more secure and united future.   The post Congress’s Political Amnesia: Blaming PM Modi for Nehru’s Himalayan Missteps appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 6th Jan. In the midst of escalating tensions over China’s new administrative divisions in Aksai Chin, the Congress party has unleashed a barrage of criticism against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, a closer look at history reveals the irony of this blame game: much of the territorial loss that Congress now decries occurred during the tenure of its own leader, Jawaharlal Nehru. The recent announcement of “He’an County” and “Hekang County” by China is merely the latest chapter in a story that began with diplomatic failures and strategic miscalculations under Nehru’s leadership. This political blame-shifting raises important questions about accountability, historical legacy, and the politicization of national security issues. While it is easy for the Congress to point fingers at the present government, its criticism risks exposing the cracks in its own historical record. Understanding China’s Move: The Aksai Chin Context China’s creation of He’an County and Hekang County in the disputed Aksai Chin region has once again drawn global attention to the unresolved territorial disputes between Bharat and China. The announcement underscores China’s intent to consolidate its hold over the region, which has been under its control since the 1960s. He’an County, in particular, holds strategic importance for China due to the G219 Highway, a key supply route connecting Xinjiang and Tibet. This highway was constructed by China between 1956 and 1957, and its existence was formally acknowledged in the Bharatiya Parliament by then-Prime Minister Nehru in 1959. Despite clear evidence of Chinese advances in the region, Nehru’s government failed to take decisive action to reclaim the territory, allowing China to solidify its position. Nehru’s Himalayan Blunders: A History of Strategic Failures The Congress’s current critique of PM Modi ignores the inconvenient truth of its own legacy. Key areas of Aksai Chin, now part of He’an County, were occupied during Nehru’s tenure as Prime Minister. This includes strategic locations like: Haji Langar, seized by China in 1959, following an incident in 1958 where an Bharatiya patrol was detained. Qizil Jilga, captured during the 1962 Sino-Indian War. Chung Tash, another casualty of the 1962 conflict. Dehra Compas, taken over in 1961, marking yet another failure to secure Bharatiya territory. Shamal Lungpa, occupied in 1959, where a Bharatiya patrol was attacked by Chinese forces. These losses were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of Nehru’s diplomatic and strategic missteps. Despite early warnings about Chinese intentions, Nehru’s “Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai” policy prioritized diplomatic appeasement over military preparedness, leaving Bharat vulnerable to Chinese aggression. The Politicization of National Security The Congress party’s attempt to pin the blame for China’s actions on PM Modi reflects a worrying trend in Bharatiya politics: the politicization of national security. By ignoring the historical context of Aksai Chin’s annexation and focusing solely on current developments, Congress undermines the unity required to address such challenges. The Modi government, for its part, has taken a firm stance on China’s provocations. From the 2020 Galwan clash to the current diplomatic protests against China’s administrative changes, the government has demonstrated a commitment to safeguarding Bharat’s territorial integrity. The construction of border infrastructure, bolstered troop deployment, and increased surveillance in the region are steps that reflect a proactive approach—far removed from the inaction that characterized Nehru’s tenure. A Lesson in Accountability The Congress’s criticism of PM Modi over Aksai Chin exposes its selective memory and political opportunism. While it is fair to scrutinize the actions of the present government, doing so without acknowledging the historical context erodes credibility. The party’s failure to accept

responsibility for Nehru’s missteps suggests a lack of introspection and an unwillingness to engage in constructive dialogue on national security. For voters, this episode serves as a reminder of the importance of historical awareness in political discourse. Bharat’s territorial disputes with China are not the result of recent developments but decades of strategic miscalculations. Addressing them requires unity, vision, and a commitment to learning from the past—qualities that must transcend party politics. Conclusion: Moving Beyond Blame The Chinese government’s establishment of He’an County and Hekang County is a provocative move that underscores the ongoing challenges Bharat faces in securing its borders. However, the Congress’s attempt to blame PM Modi for these developments rings hollow in light of Nehru’s legacy of inaction in Aksai Chin. Bharat’s political leadership, irrespective of party lines, must prioritize national security over partisan attacks. As the Modi government continues to navigate these challenges, it is incumbent upon all political actors to support policies that strengthen Bharat’s territorial integrity and bolster its strategic position. Ultimately, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty demands accountability not only for present actions but also for historical decisions. Only by acknowledging the full scope of its past can Bharat chart a course for a more secure and united future.   The post Congress’s Political Amnesia: Blaming PM Modi for Nehru’s Himalayan Missteps appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[darkmaga-returns]

Ted Snider

Nov 6, 2024

The United States’ struggle to preserve the unipolar world slipped another step back when India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the People’s Republic of China’s President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the 2024 BRICS summit.

India and China’s already strained relationship strained even more in 2020 when 20 Indian troops and four Chinese troops were killed in hand-to-hand combat along their disputed border in the Galwan Valley of the Western Himalayas.

The U.S. has long exploited the animosity between the world’s two largest countries, using India as a counterbalance to China, containing the PRC and driving a wedge between it and the Global South.

In America’s geopolitical battle to maintain a U.S.-led unipolar world over a multipolar system preferred by Russia and China, India is the giant with one foot in each world. The world’s second-largest nation’s choice of sides will determine whether the unipolar world survives or evolution favors multipolarity.

But what the U.S. struggles to see—to the detriment of its own foreign policy and its own self-interest—is that India, and much of the Global South, no longer sees itself as having to make a choice between blocs. The choice of a multipolar world means not having to choose sides. In his book, The India Way, India’s foreign minister, S. Jaishankar, explains that multipolarity means that countries can deal “with contesting parties at the same time with optimal results” for their “own self-interest.” 

[globalresourcesvn]

Airtel mang đến sự kết nối ở Galwan và Daulat Beg Oldie

Airtel đã hợp tác với Quân đội Ấn Độ trong một sáng kiến ​​đột phá nhằm đưa mạng 4G của mình đến một số địa hình xa xôi và đầy thách thức nhất trên thế giới. Điều này bao gồm Galwan và Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO), tiền đồn quân sự ở cực bắc nằm ở thị trấn biên giới, ở độ cao đáng kinh ngạc 16.700 feet so với mực nước biển. Airtel hiện là nhà cung cấp dịch vụ viễn thông tư nhân duy nhất cung cấp dịch…

[the100th-monkey]

Today's News 26th October 2024

The US Was Inadvertently Responsible For The Sino-Indo Border De-Escalation Deal The US Was Inadvertently Responsible For The Sino-Indo Border De-Escalation Deal Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack, India announced earlier this week that it and China agreed to patrol their disputed border area in the way that it was before June 2020’s lethal Galwan River Valley clashes. This was made…