In Praise of the Real: Reforming the Humanities
Frederick Turner, 2009 (source; emphasis added)
Ironically, then, the sciences and the humanities have changed places. The humanities now profess a scientifically obsolete view of events, a power-based account of the world which is as incompatible with the values of human culture as Kant rightly declared the Newtonian universe to be. [...] Meanwhile the sciences, with their rigorous research methods, and beginning with presuppositions just as linear and deterministic as they were accused by the humanities of being, have disclosed to us a universe full of freedom and creativity, fertile ground for art and moral action.
Reality is legally defined as what is scientifically verifiable; hence we teach evolution in high-school biology, not scientific creationism. The humanities, however, are now teaching that reality is entirely relative to the culture and gender of the knower; our humanist professors are thus as far removed from fact as the most “biblical literalist” sect. That loss of contact with reality is also a loss of contact with the public–a failure to perform the mandate, bought and paid for fair and square by the people of our states and nation, of educating and civilizing the young, and acting as the repository and conduit of the cultural heritage.
I propose that we refound the humanities on the sciences. There are various routes by which we might recover the connection. The first is the anthropological path, retracing the roots of human arts and other activities through the oral tradition, folklore, cross-cultural anthropology, performance theory, ethnodrama, the study of human and animal ritual, archeology and human evolution. The second is the neuroscience route, the study of the neurobiological foundations of esthetic experience, language, meaning, perception, experience, etc. The third is the chaos theory route: using the powerful new sciences of complexity and nonlinear dynamics, we might develop a general vocabulary of creative emergence. The fourth is the information theory and cybernetic route: learning from the extraordinary difficulties and successes of computer science in modeling the human mind, we might develop a deeper theory of literary meaning. This approach might include game theory, and the information theory of Claude Shannon and John von Neumann. The fifth is the ecoscience route: the study of the humanities as a complex ecological system, recently emergent upon the planet, in the context of other living organisms, especially domesticated plants and animals.
If we seek for scientific foundations, there are those who would raise theoretical and political objections to foundations and foundationalism. [...] One maintains that since everything we can know depends on how we see it, there is no fundamental reality (phenomenology). A second reminds us of Wittgenstein’s dicta: “whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must remain silent” [...] and maintains therefore that since everything we say depends on how we say it, there is no fundamental reality (linguistic philosophy, deconstruction). A third points out that because everything is dependent on its context within a structure, there is no fundamental reality (structuralism). A fourth sardonically points out that whenever anyone says anything, they are naturally following their socioeconomic interests [...] (Foucauldian discourse analysis, neomarxism). A fifth reminds us that everything that is said is said in a determining historical context [...] (the new historicism). A sixth insists that the psyche that says anything is an illusory construction anyway [...] (the neofreudianisms of Lacan, Deleuze, and Guattari). A seventh denies the objectivity of science, because science is made up of a society of persons with ideological and economic interests [...] (the scientific antifoundationalism of Kuhn, Feyerabend, and Habermas). An eighth points out that whoever says anything has a sex and a gender, usually male, that irremediably distorts what is said [...] (feminist epistemology). And so on; and we can now add a ninth, that maintains that all human views of reality are only human views, and that since we cannot know how Nature sees things, there is no fundamental reality: the view of the radical Greens and Deep Ecologists, such as Arne Naess and George Sessions.
Of course the secret of all these antifoundationalisms is that they are really foundationalisms in disguise. [...] stated in their positive form these positions do not particularly contradict each other [...] And this conclusion might lead us, by an odd but perfectly legitimate turn of logic, to the positive assertion that all these implied foundations are indeed foundational–sensation, language, structure, power, history, psychology, legitimation, sex, and nature, and that probably there are dozens of other foundations as well. Foundations, then, need not be mutually exclusive; and the interesting thing might be to work out how all these foundations are related to each other. A universe crammed with partial foundations, that have not ceased to interact, and that thus leave open a huge future space where they are unpredictably going next–this is what we see if we escape the feverish loyalties of a particular ideological camp.
Consider a view of the world which is anchored, relatively fixed, and unitary at one end, and open-ended, changeable and multiple at the other–a tree structure. This would give us the benefit of a common deep language and a protean and creative surface language. This is what I propose–a past that is relatively fixed and knowable, though never absolutely, and a future that can grow in whatever direction we and all other desiring and imagining beings may desire or imagine.
If observers vote on the constitution of the world, I would simply extend–or rather, recognize–the franchise and observerhood of everything else in the universe, from animals and plants to atoms and elementary particles. Thus for beings like ourselves who like to see things as texts, the universe is to some extent a text, but there are many entities that do not experience the world in those terms, and if we ignore them, we will come to grief. Feyerabend thought that humans constructed atoms; I would reply, yes, and atoms construct us also. Indeed, there are cases, as when Feyerabend’s own world-constructing activity entered into contest with that of his and the world’s molecules, when human observers lose the vote and must, tragically, die. Reality is consensual, yes; but the consensus rather massively includes all the energy and matter in all the stars and galaxies. [...] Radical ethnic and feminist critiques of science remain valid but with a hugely reduced relevance, since the critics are always free to go canvass the nonhuman part of the real universe for themselves, and submit themselves to its arbitrement in the form of successful prediction; such postmodern critiques then become legitimate nitpicking. The new neuroscience shows us how subtly the human and animal brain compensates for any distortions in its perception, how the eye for instance corrects for perspectival errors; and evolutionary science shows how such a bias toward “objective” truth is dictated by species survival.
5 notes
·
View notes
“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”
Theodore Roosevelt
“Malthus has been vindicated; reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to
the village.”
Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, stated such,
ironically, in 1984:
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels.
Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get
the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population
is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian
government, even fascism, to reduce it....” “Our program in El Salvador didn’t
work. The infrastructure was not there to support it. There were just too
goddamned many people.... To really reduce population, quickly, you
have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill
significant numbers of fertile age females....” The quickest way
to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or
through disease like the Black Death....
Thomas Ferguson, State Department Office of Population Affairs
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like
would fit the bill.... But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of
mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human
intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can
be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider – Founder and Secretary, respectively,
TheClub of Rome, The First Global Revolution, pgs 104-105, 1991
A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an
uncontrolled multiplication of people.... We must shift our efforts from the
treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will
demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.
Stanford Professor ” Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per
day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier
I believe that human overpopulation is the fundamental problem on Earth Today”
and, “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”
Dave Foreman, Sierra Club and co founder of Earth First!
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion,
about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is
the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people
left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Mikhail Gorbachev
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore
order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that
there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that
threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to
deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When
presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the
guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
Dr. Henry Kissinger New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973
Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third
world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of
minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller
“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and
fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be
solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate
for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola
Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years.
“We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing
humans. Think about that. “You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who
survives, he will have to bury nine”
Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert,
showed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on
population control
“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity,
cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception,
sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of
numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”
Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER
“In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women
to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.”
Mark Earley in The Wrong Kind of Party Christian Post 10/27 2008
"Women in the Netherlands who are deemed by the state to be unfit mothers
should be sentenced to take contraception for a prescribed period of two years.”
Marjo Van Dijken (author of the bill in the Netherlands) in the Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/04/humanrights-women
“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”
Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones
“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to
lower human population levels.”
Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the
World Wildlife Fund
"Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents
hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use
contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for
childbearing.”
David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover
cutting the Fallopian tubes.”
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Rome was decided, there was concern
about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t
want to have too many of.”
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the
optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various
countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might
remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some
power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Obama’s Science czar John P. Holdren: From a book he helped write ‘Ecoscience’
“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world
government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent,
all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there
is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly
evil in intent.”
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that
was shot down by the Soviet Union
P.S. And there's this:
“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to
worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian
Initiation.”
David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations
(People will shortly be expected to line up to take the COVID vaccination, with its
Luciferase enzyme)
2 notes
·
View notes