#economic viability

[tenth-sentence]

Copper ores often have concentrations of copper less than 1% by mass, so achieving economic viability requires mining operations on a huge scale.

"Chemistry" 2e - Blackman, A., Bottle, S., Schmid, S., Mocerino, M., Wille, U.

[howdoesone]

How does one create sustainable and resilient architectural solutions that respond to regional challenges?

Creating sustainable and resilient architectural solutions that respond to regional challenges is a critical aspect of modern design practice. Regions around the world face unique environmental, social, and economic challenges that require innovative and context-specific approaches. This article explores the significance of creating sustainable and resilient architectural solutions, discusses the…

[rkassociates]

Making Informed Decisions: The Advantages of TEV Study Services in Project Planning

In today’s dynamic business landscape, the need for informed decision-making during project planning is crucial. Successfully transforming an idea into a viable project requires a careful assessment of feasibility, sustainability, and profitability. Techno Economic Viability (TEV Study Services) provide essential insights that facilitate effective navigation of these complexities.

Defining Techno Economic Viability

Techno Economic Viability involves a comprehensive evaluation of both technical and economic aspects of a project to determine its feasibility. This multifaceted approach combines engineering assessments with financial analyses, allowing organizations to ascertain whether a proposed project is practical and financially viable. A thorough TEV analysis typically encompasses several critical components:

Technical Assessment: This element evaluates the technological requirements and capabilities of the project, including existing technologies, availability of skilled labor, and necessary infrastructure.

Economic Analysis: This focuses on financial feasibility by examining cost structures, potential revenue streams, market demand, and competitive positioning to evaluate profitability.

Risk Evaluation: TEV studies assess various risks associated with the project, including market, operational, and environmental risks. Identifying these risks early allows organizations to develop effective mitigation strategies.

Market Assessment: A thorough understanding of market dynamics is vital. TEV services analyze market trends, target demographics, and competitive landscapes to ensure the project addresses genuine needs and opportunities.

By integrating these components, TEV Study Services offer a holistic view essential for informed decision-making.

The Significance of Informed Decision-Making

The importance of informed decision-making in project planning cannot be overstated. Poor decisions can lead to wasted resources, project delays, and failures. Key reasons for the importance of informed decision-making include:

Resource Allocation: Effective decision-making ensures optimal use of time, capital, and human resources, thereby minimizing the risk of overspending and mismanagement.

Stakeholder Confidence: Transparent decision-making supported by thorough research fosters trust among stakeholders and investors. When stakeholders see a well-structured plan, they are more likely to support the project.

Adaptability: Informed decisions enable organizations to remain agile. By understanding market conditions and potential risks, businesses can pivot or adjust strategies as needed to maintain competitiveness.

Long-Term Success: Ultimately, informed decision-making lays the foundation for sustainable growth. By considering all relevant factors, organizations can pursue projects that align with their strategic objectives, enhancing overall performance.

Benefits of TEV Study Services

TEV Study Services offer numerous advantages that significantly enhance project planning:

Comprehensive Analysis: One of the primary benefits of TEV Study Services is their holistic approach. By integrating technical and economic evaluations, these services ensure that all critical aspects of a project are thoroughly examined, reducing the risk of oversight.

Risk Mitigation: Early identification of potential challenges and risks enables organizations to develop strategies to manage these risks, leading to more secure investments.

Resource Optimization: A detailed TEV analysis helps businesses allocate resources more effectively, ensuring that time and capital are utilized efficiently.

Strategic Alignment: TEV Study Services assist in ensuring that projects align with broader organizational goals, guaranteeing that every initiative supports the company’s vision and strategic direction.

Enhanced Credibility: A well-structured TEV analysis boosts a project’s credibility with investors and stakeholders, facilitating smoother approvals and support.

Data-Driven Insights: In an increasingly data-driven world, TEV Study Services leverage both quantitative and qualitative data to guide decision-making, ensuring choices are based on solid evidence.

Practical Applications of TEV Study Services

To illustrate the effectiveness of TEV Study Services, consider the following applications:

Renewable Energy Projects: With the increasing focus on sustainability, TEV studies play a critical role in evaluating the feasibility of renewable energy initiatives. By assessing technological capabilities and market demand, these studies guide investment decisions in solar, wind, and other energy sources.

Infrastructure Development: Large-scale infrastructure projects, such as highways and bridges, require substantial investment. TEV studies provide essential insights into the technical and economic dimensions of these projects, assisting both government and private entities in making informed funding and execution decisions.

Technology Startups: For startups seeking investment, a TEV study can effectively outline the viability of their innovative products. Presenting a comprehensive analysis of market potential and technical feasibility enhances their attractiveness to investors.

Conclusion

In the complex field of project planning, making informed decisions is vital for success. TEV Study Services uniquely combine technical and economic insights, empowering organizations to navigate challenges and seize opportunities with confidence. By leveraging these services, businesses can ensure their projects are not only viable but also positioned for long-term success. Adopting this approach is a proactive step toward informed decision-making and sustainable growth, ultimately enhancing a company’s competitive position. As the demand for data-driven strategies continues to rise, the significance of TEV Study Services will only grow, solidifying their role as an invaluable asset for organizations dedicated to excellence in project planning.

[rkassociatess]

Techno-Economic Viability Studies Are Essential for Modern Businesses

Techno Economic Viability Study: In today's corporate world, informed decisions are essential. Companies today face global competition, fast technical breakthroughs, and changing market dynamics. To overcome these challenges, businesses must guarantee their ideas are technically and commercially viable. Techno-Economic Viability (TEV) studies help.

Techno-economic viability studies assess projects' technical and economic elements. TEV studies help firms make strategic decisions that boost growth and sustainability by evaluating project design, technology selection, cost-benefit analysis, and risk management. TEV studies are crucial to modern businesses, and this blog post will discuss their importance, vital elements, real-world applications, and rising trends. Discover how TEV studies may transform your business.

Technoeconomic Viability Studies—What Are They? A Techno-Economic Viability study is a comprehensive assessment of a project's technical and economic viability. It has three main parts:

Technical Feasibility: This evaluates if the project's technology meets operational standards and is efficient. Economic viability: Cost-benefit analysis, revenue projections, and profitability indicators like ROI, NPV, and IRR are used to assess the project's financial prospects. Risk Analysis: Identifies project hazards and suggests mitigation solutions.

Modern Businesses Need TEV Studies Technoeconomic viability (TEV) studies are crucial to modern business decisions. They're essential because: Strategy and Investment Choices Making informed investment selections is vital in today's corporate world of limited resources and tough competition. TEV studies analyze projects' technical and economic feasibility, helping businesses allocate resources. Enterprises can strategically invest in technology to maximize returns and reduce risks by evaluating its costs and advantages. Risk mitigation and sustainability Technical and economic hazards are inherent in any undertaking. TEV investigations identify dangers early and provide mitigation techniques. Risk management in advance ensures project viability and sustainability. Businesses can avoid costly overruns and delays by anticipating and planning for probable issues, improving project execution and stability. Optimizing Operations and Competitiveness TEV studies help firms optimize operations in an era of efficiency and competitiveness. TEV studies help companies streamline and eliminate waste by examining project technical factors including resource use and operational effectiveness. This boosts productivity and market competitiveness. TEV investigations also reveal market trends and demand forecasts, helping organizations adjust to changing market conditions. Maintaining competitiveness in a changing corporate environment requires adaptability.

Practical Uses and Success Stories TEV studies have been used in many industries, proving their applicability and value. TEV studies help manufacturers assess the viability of new production lines or facilities. Wind farms and solar power facilities use TEV studies to determine their viability. TEV studies help IT companies evaluate new software or technological infrastructure changes. TEV studies help healthcare practitioners evaluate new medical technologies and facility expansions. These real-world applications demonstrate the importance of TEV studies in assuring technically sound and economically profitable projects. Business Future-proofing Adaptability and innovation become more vital as technology and market conditions change. TEV studies give companies the knowledge and insights to future-proof. By analyzing new technology and economic models, organizations may stay competitive and ahead of industry trends. TEV Study Key Elements: Technical Assessment Project Design and Technology Choice: Choosing the correct technology is crucial for project success. TEV studies evaluate technologies and choose the best. Operational Efficiency and Resource Utilization: Evaluation and optimization of resource use and operations are crucial for success. For economic evaluation, a cost-benefit analysis is used to compare project expenses and predicted benefits to estimate its overall value. Economic viability is assessed by estimating future revenues by using profitability indicators like ROI, NPV, and IRR. Manage Risk Risk Identification and Analysis: TEV studies identify and assess project risks. Implementing Mitigation measures: Risk mitigation measures improve project execution. Practical Uses and Case Studies Industries that have effectively used TEV research include: Manufacturing: TEV studies assess the technical and economic viability of new manufacturing lines or facilities. Renewable Energy: TEV studies evaluate wind farms and solar power facilities. Information technological: TEV studies evaluate new software and technological infrastructure enhancements in IT. TEV studies help healthcare practitioners evaluate new medical technologies and facility expansions. A manufacturing organization may utilize a TEV analysis to choose a new automation system that is technically sound and lucrative. Best Practices for TEV Studies Consider these key strategies for an engaging TEV study: Techniques for Data Collection and Analysis: Gather and evaluate data using trusted sources and powerful analytical tools. To get varied viewpoints and insights, collaborate with experts and stakeholders. Advanced Tools & Software: Use contemporary software to simplify and improve TEV research accuracy. Issues and Limitations Despite their benefits, TEV studies confront problems like: Common TEV Study Obstacles: Predicting market developments and gathering accurate data are tough. Tips for Overcoming These Issues: Utilizing strong data collection methods and adapting to market dynamics can overcome these challenges. Future TEV Research Trends New trends in TEV research bode well: Technology will make TEV research more precise and efficient. Economic Models and Market Dynamics: As markets change, TEV studies will incorporate new economic models. Sustainability and Environmental Considerations: TEV studies will include environmental effect evaluations as sustainability becomes more important.

Conclusion Techno-Economic Viability studies are essential for modern businesses. They assess project feasibility from technical, economic, and risk perspectives. Businesses may make informed decisions, manage risks, and grow sustainably with TEV research. Any organization that wants to succeed in today's changing market must understand TEV studies.

[farmerstrend]

Pomelo Fruit Farming in Kenya: A Complete Cultivation Guide

Pomelo (Citrus grandis) is a greenish, tropical and subtropical fruit originally that is larger than any other citrus fruit on the planet (thus the species name – ‘grandis’). Though it is the ancestor of the commonly cultivated grapefruit (citrus x paradisi), the pomelo has a thick, hard-to-peel rind and doesn’t have a lot of juice. This Delicious fruit is used as fresh and is also used for…

[etccsy]

Nuclear Energy Between Peace And War: The story of destruction in the Middle East or its resurrection

In "Nuclear Energy Between Peace And War," Issam Khoury skillfully navigates the intricate interplay of nuclear energy, geopolitics, and environmental challenges in the Middle East. Meticulous in dissecting dual energy applications and geopolitical tensio

In a world where energy sources and geopolitical dynamics intersect, “Nuclear Energy Between Peace And War” by Issam Khoury stands out as a comprehensive guide. This book offers a deep exploration of the complex issues surrounding nuclear energy, shedding light on its peaceful and military implications and its impact on regional and international peace. In this article, we examine this…

[engineersnvaluerz]

What are the benefits of Chartered Engineer certification

Chartered Engineer certification offers a range of benefits to engineers, their employers, and the engineering profession as a whole. Here are some of the key advantages:

Professional Recognition: Chartered Engineer status is a globally recognized mark of professionalism and competence in engineering. It demonstrates that an engineer has met the rigorous standards set by a professional engineering institution.

Career Advancement: It can significantly enhance an engineer's career prospects by opening doors to higher-level positions, increased responsibilities, and better job opportunities. Many employers prefer or require chartered status for senior roles.

Global Mobility: Chartered Engineer status is often accepted and respected internationally. This allows engineers to work on projects and in countries around the world, offering greater career flexibility.

Increased Earning Potential: Chartered engineers tend to earn more than their non-chartered counterparts due to their advanced qualifications and expertise.

Enhanced Credibility: Clients, employers, and peers have greater confidence in the abilities and knowledge of chartered engineers, which can lead to more opportunities and trust in their work.

Continual Learning and Development: Chartered engineers are required to maintain their competence through ongoing professional development. This ensures that they stay up-to-date with the latest industry trends and best practices.

[reasonsforhope]

"Environmental groups are claiming victory after Mitsubishi Chemical Group dropped plans for a $1.3 billion plant in the heart of Louisiana’s industrial corridor. 

In the works for more than a decade, the chemical manufacturing complex would have been the largest of its kind in the world, stretching across 77 acres in Geismar, a small community about 60 miles west of New Orleans. Tokyo-based Mitsubishi cited only economic factors when announcing the cancellation last week, but a recent report on the plant’s feasibility noted that growing community concern about air pollution could also hamper the project’s success. 

“The frontline communities are fighting back, causing delays, and that amounts to money being lost,” said Gail LeBoeuf with Inclusive Louisiana, an environmental group focused on the industrial corridor along the Mississippi River known as Cancer Alley.

The nonprofit group Beyond Petrochemical declared the project’s failure a “major victory for the health and safety of Louisianans.”

According to Mitsubishi, the plant could have produced up to 350,000 tons per year of methyl methacrylate, or MMA, a colorless liquid used in the manufacture of plastics and a host of consumer products, including TVs, paint, and nail polish.

The plant was expected to be a major polluter, releasing hundreds of tons per year of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and other harmful chemicals, according to its permit information...

In July, a report on the plant’s viability warned that a global oversupply of MMA and fierce local opposition made the project a “bad bet.” 

Conducted by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, the report said that credit agencies are paying more attention to “community sentiment” about petrochemical projects, particularly in Louisiana. In Geismar and other parts of Cancer Alley, there’s a “disproportionately heavy concentration of polluting industrial facilities” and Mitsubishi could become “entangled in a decades-long dispute involving issues of racial inequality and environmental justice,” the IEEFA report said. 

Geismar residents are surrounded by about a half-dozen large chemical facilities that emit harmful levels of air pollution. Of the more than 6,000 people who live within the 3 miles of the planned project site, about 40 percent are Black or Hispanic, and 20 percent are considered low-income, according to federal data. 

“The air here is already so dirty that the kids can’t play outside anymore,” said Pamela Ambeau, Ascension Parish resident and member of the group Rural Roots Louisiana.

The proposed plant is the latest in a string of failed industrial projects in Cancer Alley. Since 2019, local activism was instrumental in halting the development of two large plastics complexes in St. James Parish and a grain export terminal in St. John the Baptist Parish. All three projects would have been built in historically Black and rural communities."

-via Grist, January 16, 2025

[technofeudalism]

What's New Experts are warning of a looming increase in grocery prices as agricultural soil becomes increasingly unproductive. In a concerning trend that could impact households across the globe, the combination of overfarming, climate change and insufficient sustainable practices has left vast swaths of farmland degraded and unproductive, threatening food supply chains and driving up costs. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that 33 percent of the Earth's soils are already degraded and more than 90 percent could become degraded by 2050. Why It Matters According to the FAO, soil erosion "occurs naturally under all climatic conditions and on all continents, but it is significantly increased and accelerated by unsustainable human activities (up to 1,000 times) through intensive agriculture, deforestation, overgrazing and improper land use changes. "Soil erosion rates are much higher than soil formation rates," the FAO said. "Soil is a finite resource, meaning its loss and degradation is not recoverable within a human lifespan." A map previously published by Newsweek predicts that 95 percent of America's soil will be degraded in less than 30 years. Only a 5 percent area is marked not degraded.

i absolutely love (/s) how this story is being framed as further price inflation and economic woes being the primary thing to worry about. the worst part of barren food stores isn't related to high prices.

the soil of our earth, our home planet, is dying/being killed by industrial agriculture, and as such we are now struggling to produce food. what this describes is imminent global famine within most of our lifetimes (~30yrs). sticker shock is not the biggest threat. that award goes to malnutrition and starvation.

it's possible to recover from this. but the solutions involved cost money and also winds up reducing overall crop yield, so many farmers aren’t going to pursue these solutions as frequently because they just aren’t feasible. the biggest concern for the average farmer is economic viability. point blank.

thus, any efforts at taking even baby steps to solve this problem will require centralized governments, particularly in the west, to enact direct, formative changes. unfortunately, all of them happen to be collapsing at this very moment. so... hang on tight, i suppose.

[psychotrenny]

There's a real unearned confidence to the way that Social Democrats talk about their ideology, like they've cracked the code and found the perfect way forward and the only reason people disagree is because they're misguided or evil. Like they'll correctly point out problems within Neoliberal Capitalism before spouting some absolute nonsense about how uniquely evil and dysfunctional Communism was (nearly always in the past tense too; they take it for granted that the end of the USSR was the end of all Communism) and then going "Don't worry though, there's a third way; a mixed regulated economy. We can have a free market in consumer goods while making sure that corporations pay their fair share in wages and taxes that can fund the welfare that looks after everyone". And like putting aside the fact that such a model relies on the super-profits of imperialist exploitation to actually function, and the inherent instability of an arrangement where the Bourgeoisie make concessions even while maintaining ultimate control of the economy, there's the simple fact that much of the Imperial Core did indeed had Social Democracy but does not anymore.

Like these Social Democrats never think about why that might be, why their ideology failed and what they can learn from it going forward. They just act as though some dumb individuals (i.e. Ronald Reagan, Milton Friedman etc.) managed to slip into power and make bad decisions and like the best way to fix this is to vote good people in who'll change it back. Like hell a lot of these people take the previous existence of these policies as like a good point, the whole "We had them before so we aren't being radical by wanting them back. We don't want anything crazy we just wanna bring back The New Deal or Keynesian Economic policy or whatever". There's never any thought about why those policies failed (how often do you hear these people even talk about "stagflation" or "the oil crisis" let alone the impact of the fall of the soviet union) and what implications this might have on the viability of bringing it back. They also love talking about how Social Democratic institutions are still largely intact in the Scandinavian countries, but rather than even consider what specific factors in their political-economic situation led to this these people just go "Damn isn't Sweden great. Why aren't we doing exactly what they do?"

And sure some people might compare this to Marxism-Leninism, the whole "trying to bring back a defeated ideology", but for one it's stupid to treat the dissolution of the USSR as the end of Communism as a global political force. It may have been a major blow, but even if you write off like Cuba and Vietnam as too small and insignificant to matter you can't just fucking ignore that over 1/6 of the world's population continues live under a Marxist Leninist party. Whatever concessions these countries may have made to global Capitalism, it's just plain ignorant to act as though Communism suffered anywhere near the humiliating loss of global power and credibility that Social Democracy has. Sure the latter may be more politically acceptable to toy with in "The West", but "The Western World" ≠ The Entire World. Also, nearly every ML on the planet is painfully aware that Soviet Communism collapsed and that it collapsed for a reason. There might be plenty of contention about why exactly it died and what exactly we can learn from this, but nearly everyone agrees that we need to learn and ideologically grow. No serious Communist wants to "bring back the USSR" in the same way that many Social Democrats want to "bring back The Welfare State". Far from being a form of "best of both worlds" mixed economy, Social Democracy is nothing more than a flimsy tool to stabilise Imperialist Capitalism at its moments of greatest strain. And if people are still gonna promote it wholeheartedly as the best possible solution, I wish they'd be a little less arrogant about it. It's not as though they have history on their side

[lets-steal-an-archive]

Under the six-week ban, providers could not perform abortions if they detected fetal cardiac activity, which emerges at about six weeks into pregnancy. Many women, McBurney wrote, do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks.

“For these women, the liberty of privacy means that they alone should choose whether they serve as human incubators for the five months leading up to viability,” McBurney wrote. “It is not for a legislator, a judge, or a commander from The Handmaid’s Tale to tell these women what to do with their bodies during this period when the fetus cannot survive outside the womb any more so than society could – or should – force them to serve as a human tissue bank or to give up a kidney for the benefit of another.”

In a footnote, McBurney added: “There is an uncomfortable and usually unspoken subtext of involuntary servitude swirling about this debate, symbolically illustrated by the composition of the legal teams in this case. It is generally men who promote and defend laws like the Life Act, the effect of which is to require only women – and, given the socio-economic and demographic evidence presented at trial, primarily poor women, which means in Georgia primarily black and brown women – to engage in compulsory labor, ie, the carrying of a pregnancy to term at the government’s behest.”

[covid-safer-hotties]

SARS-CoV-2 impairs male fertility by targeting semen quality and testosterone level: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Published Sept 9, 2024

Abstract Background Since the discovery of COVID-19 in December 2019, the novel virus has spread globally causing significant medical and socio-economic burden. Although the pandemic has been curtailed, the virus and its attendant complication live on. A major global concern is its adverse impact on male fertility.

Aim This study was aimed to give an up to date and robust data regarding the effect of COVID-19 on semen variables and male reproductive hormones.

Materials and methods Literature search was performed according to the recommendations of PRISMA. Out of the 852 studies collected, only 40 were eligible for inclusion in assessing the effect SARS-CoV-2 exerts on semen quality and androgens. More so, a SWOT analysis was conducted.

Results The present study demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 significantly reduced ejaculate volume, sperm count, concentration, viability, normal morphology, and total and progressive motility. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 led to a reduction in circulating testosterone level, but a rise in oestrogen, prolactin, and luteinizing hormone levels. These findings were associated with a decline in testosterone/luteinizing hormone ratio.

Conclusions The current study provides compelling evidence that SARS-CoV-2 may lower male fertility by reducing semen quality through a hormone-dependent mechanism; reduction in testosterone level and increase in oestrogen and prolactin levels.

[rkassociates]

Key Factors Assessed in a Comprehensive TEV Study

Techno-Economic Viability (TEV) studies are essential tools for evaluating the feasibility and potential success of projects across various sectors. By examining both technical and economic aspects, TEV studies provide a comprehensive assessment that informs decision-making for investors, stakeholders, and project managers.

Here are the key factors typically assessed in a comprehensive TEV study:

1. Technical Feasibility

Technical feasibility is a foundational component of any TEV study. This assessment examines whether the proposed technology and processes can be implemented effectively. Key aspects include:

Technology Assessment: Evaluating the suitability and maturity of the technology to be used in the project. This includes examining whether the technology has been successfully implemented in similar projects.

Design and Engineering: Reviewing project designs to ensure they meet technical specifications and standards. This involves assessing architectural plans, equipment specifications, and infrastructure requirements.

Resource Availability: Analyzing the availability of necessary resources, such as skilled labor, raw materials, and equipment, to support the project.

2. Market Analysis

A thorough market analysis is crucial to understanding the project's potential demand and competition. This involves:

Demand Forecasting: Estimating the future demand for the project’s output, taking into account market trends, consumer behavior, and economic conditions.

Competitive Landscape: Analyzing competitors, their market share, and pricing strategies to determine the project’s positioning within the market.

Target Audience: Identifying the primary customer segments and understanding their preferences and purchasing behavior.

3. Financial Viability

Financial viability is at the heart of any TEV study, as it assesses the project's potential to generate profits. Key financial elements include:

Capital Expenditure (CapEx): Evaluating the initial investment required to set up the project, including costs for land, equipment, and construction.

Operational Expenditure (OpEx): Analyzing ongoing costs, such as labor, utilities, maintenance, and materials, to determine the project's sustainability.

Revenue Projections: Estimating potential income from the project based on market analysis and demand forecasting.

Financial Metrics: Calculating key indicators such as Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), and payback period to assess profitability and investment attractiveness.

4. Risk Assessment

Risk assessment is a critical aspect of a TEV study, as it identifies potential challenges that could impact project success. This includes:

Technical Risks: Evaluating the risks associated with the technology and processes used, such as reliability issues or potential obsolescence.

Market Risks: Analyzing uncertainties in market demand, price fluctuations, and competitive pressures that could affect revenue.

Financial Risks: Assessing factors like funding availability, interest rates, and currency fluctuations that could impact financial performance.

Regulatory Risks: Identifying any legal or regulatory hurdles that could affect project implementation or operations.

5. Environmental and Social Impact

Assessing the environmental and social impacts of a project is increasingly important. This includes:

Environmental Assessment: Evaluating potential environmental effects, such as resource depletion, pollution, and habitat disruption. This often involves compliance with environmental regulations and standards.

Social Impact Analysis: Understanding how the project will affect local communities, including job creation, social equity, and community well-being.

Sustainability Considerations: Assessing the project’s alignment with sustainable practices and long-term environmental goals.

6. Regulatory Compliance

A thorough TEV study examines compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and standards. This includes:

Permits and Approvals: Identifying necessary permits and licenses required to operate legally and understanding the timeline for obtaining them.

Health and Safety Regulations: Ensuring the project adheres to health and safety standards to protect workers and the community.

Industry Standards: Evaluating compliance with industry-specific regulations and best practices.

7. Implementation Strategy

Finally, a comprehensive TEV study outlines the strategy for project implementation, including:

Timeline and Milestones: Developing a project timeline with key milestones to track progress and ensure timely completion.

Resource Allocation: Identifying the resources required for each phase of the project and ensuring their availability.

Monitoring and Evaluation: Establishing mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to track project performance against objectives.

Conclusion

A comprehensive TEV study provides invaluable insights into the feasibility and potential success of a project. By assessing technical feasibility, market dynamics, financial viability, risk factors, and compliance requirements, stakeholders can make informed decisions that enhance project outcomes. As projects become increasingly complex and multifaceted, the importance of thorough TEV studies cannot be overstated. Investing the time and resources into a detailed TEV analysis ultimately sets the foundation for successful project execution and sustainable growth.

Looking for TEV Report Services Do visit here.

https://www.rkassociates.org/OurServices/viewPage/MjM=

[tanadrin]

I think Democratic complaints about the media are in some sense correct. Even the Democratic media ran endless stories casting every positive economic indicator under Biden in a negative light, and I think that helped fuel discourse about how the economy was Bad, Actually, which helped fuel anti-Biden sentiment, even long after the economy started to improve in a substantial way for most people. I think the “liberal” media has been harangued for decades into doing this weird both-sidesism that, even while they explicitly endorse and support Democrats on their editorial pages, forces them to try to symmetrically cover people like Harris and Trump, though they are not symmetric candidates (e.g. “sanewashing”). It is indeed possible to report on somebody like Trump in ways which are substantively not totally incorrect but which are tonally deeply misleading, you know?

And yet I don’t know about the viability of trying to build Liberal Fox News to counter this; the liberal/Democratic coalition in the US just isn’t constructed in the same way as the conservative one. Fearmongering and paranoia, which have made conservative media commercially successful, are inherently activating of conservative politics, not liberal politics. Democratic messaging just doesn’t function in the same way as Republican messaging, especially these days. There may be things the Democrats can do to improve their media game—and I think Stancil is right that they have not sufficiently grappled with the implications of the fragmented media environment and social media in particular!—but it can’t be to try to make a mirror image of conservative media. I’m not sure that will work.

[najia-cooks]

[ID: Sweet potatoes with black, charred skin on a decorative plate. One has been opened to show bright orange flesh, sprinkled with sugar. End ID]

بطاطا حلوة مشوية / Batata hiluwa mashwiyya (Roasted sweet potatoes)

Sweet potatoes are considered a traditional and nostalgic food in Palestine—a gift from the land, a seasonal delicacy, a potentially profitable crop, "red gold." Every fall and winter, as they are grilled in taboon ovens throughout Gaza, their smell fills the air.

This recipe uses a method of preparation common in rural Palestine, which applies direct heat to char the potatoes; the black, crackly skin is then peeled off, leaving tender, steaming, sweet flesh with a roasted aroma. The peeled sweet potato is eaten on its own, or sprinkled with sugar.

The recent history of sweet potatoes in Gaza is a microcosm of Israel's economic control of the region during that time. Though they grow well in Gaza's soil, they are a risky commitment for its farmers, as the seeds or seedlings must be imported from Israel at considerable expense (about 40 shekels, or $10, per plantlet), and they need to be weeded every day and irrigated every other day. Water for irrigation is scarce in Gaza, as Israel drains and contaminates much of the supply.

Nevertheless, the crop would be a profitable one if Gazan farmers were allowed to export it. In the shmita year of 2014, for the first time since the Israeli military's deadly 51-day invasion two months prior, restrictions briefly eased to allow Gazans to export some agricultural products to Europe; the first shipment contained 30 tons of sweet potatoes. However, an estimated 90% of the sweet potato crop was at that time unsuitable for export, having been damaged by Israeli shrapnel. The Gazan Ministry of Agriculture estimated that damages of this kind cost the agricultural sector about 550 million USD during this year.

Gazan economist Maher al-Taba’a holds that Israel temporarily allowing export of a token amount of sweet potatoes “is nothing more than media propaganda which is meant to confuse international audiences" by giving the impression that the siege on Gaza was looser than it had been before the 2014 ceasefire agreement; meanwhile, the number of allowed exports had actually decreased since before the invasion occurred. Gazan farmers, in fact, were not even allowed to export produce to Palestinians in the West Bank until 2017.

The next shmita year (an agricultural sabbath during which ultra-Orthodox Jews allow their fields to lie fallow) began in September of 2021, around the same time as the beginning of the sweet potato harvest. In anticipation of the shmita year, and in keeping with the trickle of Gazan exports that had been allowed into Israel in the intervening years, many farmers had planted more than they otherwise would have. But Israel delayed accepting the imports, leading many farmers to throw away rotting produce, or to sell their produce in the local market for far lower prices than they had been expecting.

Israel's habit of closing off Gaza's exports arbitrarily and without notice recurred during the harvest season of 2022. When Israeli former MK Yaakov Litzman called on Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Oded Forer to import sweet potatoes from Gaza due to a shortage of the produce in Israel, Forer refused, citing Israeli soldiers whom Palestinian resistance fighters had taken hostage as rationale for his decision. Other officials were surprised at the linking of an agricultural matter to a political one.

Farmers had no choice but to enter the harvest season hoping that the decision would be reversed and that their time, labor, money, and scarce water resources would not go to waste. With these last-minute decisions that cause Gazan farmers to be unable to fulfill their contracts, Israel damages the future viability of Gazan exports to European markets.

Support Palestinian resistance by calling Elbit System’s (Israel’s primary weapons manufacturer) landlord and donating to Palestine Action’s bail fund.

Equipment:

A fire, wood-burning oven, gas stove, or broiler

A baking sheet

Ingredients:

Sweet potatoes. Choose a variety with red or orange skin and orange flesh, such as garnet or jewel.

Sugar, cinnamon, date syrup, or tahina, to serve.

Instructions:

1. Wash sweet potatoes. Place them at the bottom of a taboon oven, or on a baking sheet or griddle laid over a cooking fire or gas burner. You may also place them on a baking sheet or cast-iron pan inside an oven with a broiler setting.

2. Turn the gas burner on medium-high, or the broiler on low. Heat the sweet potatoes, occasionally rotating them, until their skin is blistered and blackened in multiple places and they are tender all the way through.

3. Remove potatoes and allow them to cool slightly. Slice each potato open lengthwise, or peel away its skin, and eat the interior.

Roasted sweet potatoes may be eaten on their own, or sprinkled with sugar or cinnamon-sugar, or drizzled with date syrup, tahina, chocolate sauce, etc.

[lordadmiralfarsight]

Tarrifs, shmariffs, what do ?

Grrrrreeeting my dear Tumblr users, it is I, random economy oriented Tumblr User that was onces convinced his blog was gonna be about ships (and not those on water).

I come to you bringing explanations on tarriffs, what they do, what they bring and what their consequences are, since they are kind of a big topic right now, what with Trump and all. "But Mr. Rando, I already know!" you say, and I believe you, and I am proud of you, but much like in my irl class, not everyone has the same knowledge base, so even if it's a bit tedious for you, we have to cover the topic so everyone is on the same page. Alright ? Swell.

So, what is a tarriff ? A tarriff is a tax levied on importations. AKA, you buy something from out-of-country and get it into the country, you pay the tarriff. Many of you will have seen the memes and viral posts, and will triumphantly point at the part where I say the importer pay the tarriffs. And you are right to do that, it's kind of very important. It's the main point, even.

Why is it the main point ? Easy : if outside stuff cost more, inside stuff better choice. Or, in non-caveman speach : the increase in cost on foreign products and resources will either increase the competitivity of domestic products and resources, or level the playing field. At least that's the idea.

"So", I hear you ask, "are you going to be the Nth user here to tell us that tarriffs are going to fuck the average US citizen over? Because we already know that."

Well, yes, but also know. Also, I'm not sure you have the nuance on the topic, and I do love me some tasty, tasty nuance. And custard. But alas, custard is not the topic of today. Economic nuance is. Now, onto the topic :

The main question to ask here is "what is getting hit by the tarriffs ?" Because the impact will vary a lot depending on what gets hit. To give a simplified framework, there's 3 types of economic goods : raw resources, transformed goods and finished products.

Raw resources are ... raw. Iron ore, lumber, clay, wheat grain, lithium ore, water, dirt, raw oil, you get the idea. Those resources tend to have razor thin profitability margins, because so much is produced.

So, what would be the goal of tarriffs on raw resources ? Well, that would be protecting or developping in-country extraction/production facilities, whether those be mines, farms, fishing fleet or lumber mills.

And that's where a tiny little factor comes into play : economic viability, AKA whether a given activity in a specific region is economically interesting.

Like I said, raw resources tend to have razor thin profitability margins, this means that overwhelmingly, raw resources are extracted in regions that allow lower costs.

Some of those costs can be reduced in costlier economies, like environmental or safety costs, with some good ol' deregulation ... up to a point. Even the notoriously protest-averse USA would face some degree of protests if all safety regulations disappeared and industrial accidents jumped 5000%. Poorer countries tend to be more lax on those regulations, and/or not really enforce them, or both.

On the other hand, there are costs that can't be reduced all that much in a given economy, like the cost of manpower. Due to the cost of living, there's a limit to how low you can go with your offered wages. For instance, offering $12 a day in the USA will yield fuck all in terms of recruitment, but $6 a day in the poorer parts of Africa will cause a flash mob of eager-to-work candidates.

And these are the two big factors of the equation : can the reducible costs be lowered enough that the irreducible costs aren't that much of an issue anymore ? And when the answer is inevitably no, can the tarriffs bridge the gap ? Well, uh ... that's gonna depend a lot. But overall, I would lean more on "no". African iron will be cheaper than US iron every day for the foreseeable future, unless you impose a fucking ungodly amount of tarriffs.

Some resources that cost more will see better results from tarriffs, but far from all. Like, tarriffs on iron, copper, tin, etc ? Bad idea. Tarriffs on helium, lithium or other rarer and costlier resources ? Could protect or help the national production indutry.

In the cases where, even with tarriffs, outside product remain more competitive, there's just going to be an increase in cost down the line, and wealth is just going to exist the country more. In the cases where the inside product becomes more-or-as competitive, then perhaps wealth can remain in the country and help the economy. But, well, we'll get to it later.

Raw resources, done. Two more to go.

Transformed goods (henceforth TG for simplicity) ! They are everywhere and they make up the bulk of international trade. Phone parts ? TGs. Flour ? TG, mostly. Tires ? Eyup, TGs. Radars ? TG. Ink? Oh you bet it's a TG.

So, what would be the aim of tarriffs on TGs? Protecting national industry, giving it room to develop or maybe even forcing multinationals to relocate/create the industry inside the country.

So, TGs are where globalization starts clashing really, really bad with tarriffs. Because you see, with globalization, there's been a global dispatching of production facilities. So you'll have part A that's produced in Italy with resources from Greece, part B that's made in Australia with Indonesian resources, part C that's made in Brazil with stuff from Zambia, etc.

the funky stuff happens when you need to combine parts A and C in a US plant, but then have to send the result over to Mexico to weld part B on top. And then you have to get it back into the US. Double tarrifs, you say? Yepperino, my dear student, double tarrifs. On this incredibly simplified exemple. Imagine what that looks like when there's 3 or 4 more parts involved.

At that point the question is : is it cheaper to pay the tarriff conga line or to just send the US parts of the production line overseas ?

"That sounds like the opposite of the stated goal" you say, with the blazé impassivity of someone that saw it coming a hundred miles away. Yes, yes it does. That's why tarriffs have to be manipulated very, very carefully, especially on transformed goods and intermediate steps of the production process, because it can stack up real fast, real bad.

Sometimes though, paying the tarriff conga line IS the better option, especially for sensitive processes that require a well-trained workforce with in-depth theoretical knowledge of very specific fields and access to training for cutting-edge machines, which is only found in the United Staaaaa ... what do you mean, Europe ?

So yeah, very sensitive, tarriff with care. And in either case, expect cost increases, which WILL be recouped with increased sale prices, leading to a domino effect.

And now, the finished products. The end of the line. The consumer targeted stuff. What you buy online and in shops.

What's the aim of tarriffs here ? Same as before, protect native industry, give it room to develop and force multinationals to relocate the production plant into the country.

At this level, you'll see similar considerations as with the TGs, with one tiny added funky detail : the costs of the two previous steps pile up here. Indeed, the tarriffs on TGs and raw ressources are liable to eat up the profit margins of the finished products, and since profit margins are sacred and must be preserved at all costs, well the simple solution is to simply increase the price of the end product in proportion to the other cost increases. And that means shit costs more for people.

"Well, that's awful" you say, and you are right. But we're getting started. It's time for another trip through early 2000s deviantart, say it with me : INFLATION !!! Except instead of your favourite character being turned into a balloon, we're talking about the content of your wallet losing value. And it's going to hit every industry that has to suffer those tarriffs. At which point the entirety of society faces a dillemma : do we increase salaries accross the board (with the associated widespread price increases) or are we chill with a global reduction in the amount of shit people can buy ?

And that's where it starts getting funky (derogatory, fear inducing), because if enough industries are hit with tarriffs, either choice is bad.

Increase salaries ? You speed up inflation and reduce confidence in your money, making exports admitedly more interesting but imports far less so, and when you are a globalized economy where there are imports everywhere at various levels, it gets spiky really fast.

Going the "tough luck fucko" route ? Well first off, rude, second off : congratulations, you are reducing the overall economic activity in your country, creating unemployment and poverty, reducing confidence in your economy and, if things go really, really poorly, starting a recession (WHOOOOO!!! Who wants to sleep under a bridge ?).

Now, is this a doomer prophecy ? No. No it's not. We have to keep in mind that systems, including economic systems, can adjust their course after starting in a new direction. It's rather unlikely that everything will consistently go bad in the worst way possible. But.

A lot of that is dependant on precision political decision-making, and the person soon-to-be in charge of these decisions in the USA has made it clear that he does not intend to listen to outside opinions or do precision. And considering his last go at it, I believe him. So I'm not optimistic. I don't think the US economy will collapse, that would be absurd, but I don't see the US having a good time either.

It's going to be very, very complicated, and it will depend a LOT on what fields are actually affected, in what proportions, etc.

And keep in mind, I haven't even talked about retaliatory tarriffs (from the people whose products you put tarriffs on). Or political tensions inside the US, that's something I don't feel qualified to talk about. Or the non-economic effects on geopolitics. Or the effects on the global economy.

If I had to make a prediction, I would guess that quite a few production lines will be reorganized to either have long stretches inside the USA or to be entirely divorced from them for as long as possible. Some products may become economically non-viable when it comes to the USA. Some US companies may find themselves no longer economically viable due to reliance on tarriff-affected outside goods and resources. It's hard to guess how large the impact will be, but there WILL be an impact, and most of it will likely be felt by the USA. Because tarriffs aren't paid on expedition, they're paid on reception.

So, as a French, all I can say is : bonne chance.