#disparities in appetite are very real

[robustcornhusk]

the instagram version of the post has an ingredients list, for the can't-wing-it-crowd (me)

i'm absolutely down to demolish a whole pan of that, no problem

Had a tiktok of someone making it bookmarked (probably accidentally tbh) so - made Lahsa. Because 'spicy tomato and egg based breakfast' was clearly the gaping hole in my cooking repertoire.

Anyway it was delicious (though made it shakshouka spicy and probably should have gone more menemen level tbh) but having made it I can in fact confirm that the guy in the video saying this egg-and-cream cheese dish is 'light' was talking entirely out of his ass.

[pseudowho]

Random question, during any of your pregnancy’s were you ever insecure about you body, how you were acting, or any of your cravings?

Me and my fiancé were talking about plans for future kids and i’m to scared to ask anyone else. could you give me a small run through of things to expect?

Thank you so much!!

Hey! I'll answer this both as a woman who has done pregnancy and birth three times, and as an experienced midwife. I don't like the 'horror story' sharing that many women do around pregnancy; it muddies the waters, and is supremely anxiety-inducing for anyone who is pregnant while hearing it.

You need to know I could write, and have written, essays on this.

As a midwife: Pregnancy is this period of unique physiological change in your body and mind, that even when it is normal (i.e. normal symptoms, not a sign of an unwell pregnancy) can be profound and lifelong.

These normal symptoms, including but not limited to nausea and vomiting (commonly referred to as morning sickness, though present at any time of day), weight gain, swelling, congestion, mood changes, appetite changes, stretch marks, heartburn and hip/joint pain, can range from barely present/absent, to severe.

Even severe pregnancy symptoms aren't always considered abnormal unless they're making you unwell (i.e. unable to keep any food or water down).

These symptoms can be altered by many of your pre-existing conditions; your weight and general health, your lifestyle and eating habits, your exercise habits, simple dumb luck/genetics, family history, mental health and body image/dysmorphia, etc.

So in that respect, in a normal pregnancy, I have seen some women who are extremely insecure and struggling to cope with the changes to their body and mind, and some women who absolutely breeze through it like pregnancy hasn't even affected them. Nowhere on this spectrum does it ever surprise me.

So now I'll talk about the average first pregnancy. As I said...the experience varies wildly.

Early on in your pregnancy (up to about 12 weeks) often feels like you're in an utter no-man's land. You feel like healthcare professionals aren't wildly interested in you; they'll take your history and 'book' your pregnancy in from (now this is based on the UK) about 8 weeks pregnancy (please note, your 'weeks of pregnancy' aren't calculated from the moment you fall pregnant, it is calculated from the first day of your last period, so in a woman with a regular 28-30 day cycle, there usually feels like there's a 'disparity' of about 2 weeks in your dates-- there isn't, this is how we calculate it). You may have an early scan or two. Essentially, we wait to see if the pregnancy is continuing; lots of miscarriages happen in the first 8 weeks. About 1/3 of pregnancies will miscarry here, in fact.

Tiredness is real at this stage. You may feel like you want to sleep constantly. It's shit that at this stage you often feel the worst, but feel like you're also just being expected to 'get on with it'. Please ask for help. If your partner isn't an equal partner pre-pregnancy, best of luck to you. You may feel utterly useless sometimes days from exhaustion, and this is normal I'm afraid.

Mid pregnancy drags, but you're usually starting to feel a bit better. The top of your uterus doesn't even begin to rise out of your pelvic brim until about 16 weeks, and the lower part of the uterus only begins to expand and form (creating that 'pregnant' belly look) from about 28 weeks, so don't try to force a bump that simply isn't there. Lots of women are very keen to look pregnant. Just chill. It's okay if you dont. Take it easy.

You do not need to eat for two; your pregnancy uses your intake more effectively when you're pregnant. Do take pregnancy specific multivitamins though. They don't need to be expensive or fancy ones; normal store bought are generally just the same, without all the fancy packaging.

Later pregnancy (the third trimester, 28 weeks onwards), you will likely notice that tiredness creeping in again. This is where your baby is largely formed structurally, and is maturing and gaining size and weight. Please ignore any and all comments from people who look at you and announce that you will have a big/small baby. They're idiots and likely wrong. Laugh it off. Here is where you may start to notice things like heartburn, hip pain, mood changes coming back again. You're heavy, and it's harder to move, and your organs are moving out of the way to facilitate a baby. Cut yourself some slack if at all possible.

So...now to me and what I had.

As Haitch: (tw/cw: suicidal ideations) So it's now a running joke, that my body was so 'good' at pregnancy, so utterly flooded with hormones, that while I became this perfect machine for growing and birthing babies, pregnancy broke me.

I spent every waking minute of the first 16 weeks nauseous and exhausted, bone deep exhausted. I had all the usual symptoms hit hard and early. I suffered severe pelvic separation, agonising pain, and @mrhaitch had to help me up from an early stage.

Thankfully, he was exquisite pregnancy support. Full is based on him, after all.

I ended up on some pretty strong medication for my heartburn, as it was severe enough that my stomach acid was damaging my vocal chords.

Worst of all was my mental health. From 26-28 weeks, your progesterone levels boom. This is normal. But this is where we discovered that progesterone is a very bad hormone for me. I developed severe antenatal depression and anxiety, and antenatal psychosis. I was paranoid, delusional, fragile and had active suicidal ideations. I had plans on how I would end my life. This is all utterly unlike me.

With my first pregnancy, our son was born at 42 weeks after a fast, normal labour, but I don't know how I didn't end my own life towards the end of my pregnancy. With my second two, we were more on it, and my lovely colleagues induced my labours from 38 weeks, purely because my mental health was so bad.

I was watched like a hawk in pregnancy 3. We knew I would lose my mind...and sadly, I did. I was medicated but It did little to help. It was at that point (October/November 2024) that I began writing on Tumblr...and here I am.

So as I have said...lots of things you could expect.

To this day in my 13 year Midwifery career, I have seen fewer than 10 women whose mental health was affected as badly my pregnancy as mine was. So I wouldn't worry too much about that.

Phew. If you have any more specific questions, I would be happy to answer.

Love,

-- Haitch xxx

[hekateinhell]

you already know why i’m here. our house chapter seven please please please i’m nothing

I do know LMAO. As soon as I wrote it, I knew if anyone asked for it, it was going to be you. 🥹 So this would have been the immediate next chapter after what's already up on ao3. I started writing this version I think September 2022 and I just never continued?

We've seen Armand explore his feminine side and his relationship to that a bit already, so in this chapter, I wanted to focus on his more masculine side just for a minute. I also wanted to illustrate a bit of their lives outside of each other. I'll just put everything I have in the doc here, just for you! ♥️

“I don’t want to talk about it.”

“You sure?”

“Positive.”

“Well, I think it’s cute,” Daniel bent down to press a kiss to Armand’s scruffy cheek, the first time in four years he’d ever actually seen the product of Armand forgoing shaving for an entire week.

It took a moment’s getting used to; not quite a five-o-clock shadow anymore, not quite a beard yet, darker than the auburn on his head by a couple tones.

Armand sighed, shifting so that his lips caught Daniel’s, more touching, resting in place, than kissing. “I wish you could work home from today,” he whispered. “I keep thinking something’s going to happen. I know I’m crazy but…” Armand trailed off, his forehead coming to rest against Daniel’s shoulder. Daniel gently rubbed his back, feeling the tension he was carrying.

“I know, baby,” hard for Armand not to be tense these days, given everything. “It’s a short day for me, and then I’ll meet you at Dr. Lydia’s at 3:30?”

He tangled his fingers through Armand’s wild hair, trying to soothe him as if he were one of the cats. Armand hadn’t felt the house in a week, and it showed. Decided he could delegate the physical tasks to a temp and do everything else virtually.

Daniel didn’t think it was depression, exactly. Armand certainly seemed happy and animated whenever Daniel was around. He still showered, ate, and slept. His appetite, in regards to food and sex, was as healthy as could be. He wasn’t starved for company either; in fact, Daniel hadn’t come home to an apartment with less than five people in it all week.

Some people he knew well, some he didn’t. Bianca, Laurent, Felix, Santiago. Armand’s European friends. As soon as Daniel’s key turned in the lock, the crew cleared out with an overlapping chorus of hellos and goodbyes — did nobody work anymore? Daniel had asked and Armand had shrugged and said, “They get by, I suppose.” Then he hurled himself at Daniel, demanding to be carried to the bedroom for a pre-dinner romp.

It seemed to Daniel he was getting laid a lot lately. There had always been a disparity in their libidos, once the honeymoon phase wore off. And to be fair, when they’d met, Daniel was trying and failing at AA and snorting conspicuous amounts of coke to compensate. He might as well as have been on Viagra those first three months. Set some very unrealistic expectations, bit of false advertising and all that.

They hadn’t clued right away after he’d started NA, because for the first time in his life, this wasn’t a relationship he wanted to escape from. He wanted to do better, see what might happen if he showed up as his best, sober self.

Only Armand’s whining and bouncing on his lap, overlappingly sleep-deprived and aroused because Daniel’s been fucking his brains out since midnight and it was 3 AM and couldn’t they go one more round please oh please? Just like last time and the time before that and the time before that!

What was different tonight?

It had been so weird to say, looking down at his limp dick that was doing most of the talking as it was, “It doesn’t wanna work, babe, I don’t know what to tell you.” Hadn’t run into this problem in years.

Armand gave him a childish pout that Daniel was sure was more real than fake. He’d rolled off him and curled by his side, pressing his face against Daniel’s neck. Giggling when he said, “I ought to give you a hickey,” like they were teenagers.

“Go for it.”

He did, sucking hard at the skin on Daniel’s throat, subconsciously and then not-so-subconsciously humping Daniel’s hip until he finished a fourth time with a low, deep moan, finally satiated and worn out.

Lucky it was January, seeing as Daniel had to wear turtlenecks for the next two days after Armand had massacred him. The little vampire.

“I’m not sure I can keep up with you,” he’d mumbled over the cereal the next morning.

“What are you talking about?” Armand’s smiling at him, having opted to bring his chair beside Daniel’s instead of staying at the opposite end.

It hurt a bit to say, “What if I can’t keep with you, like with your sex drive, and you just get bored of me?”

“You can’t be serious!” Armand laughed before the look on Daniel’s face stopped him cold. “Danny,” he reached for Daniel’s much larger hand, intertwining their fingers and pressing their palms together.

“Danny, look…” He stared down at the granola in front of him, as if it might grant him the strength to get through what he was about to say. “I like you. I am a lot, I know that! But I don’t need you to ‘keep up with me’. I’m perfectly capable of keeping up with myself.”

[originalstarfishcupcake]

The All-Consuming Food cravings: When the Giantess Consumes People

Introduction

The planet is a tapestry woven along with fallacies as well as legends, some thus bizarre they tarnish free throw lines between truth and dream. One such folklore that has captivated mankind for centuries is actually that of the giantess-- a substantial being whose appetite knows no bounds. The stories of the giantess consuming individuals stir up both are afraid and also fascination, stirring our imaginations as we reflect the implications of such hunger. Within this article, our team will dive deep right into the mythos encompassing the giantess, examining her wishes, inspirations, and the psychological reinforcements of these eye-catching stories.

This exploration is certainly not just an academic endeavor; it serves as a reflection on individual fears as well as desires. What persuades us to make such impressive figures? Why perform our team find our own selves enchanted by tales where giants walk our lands, devouring those smaller sized than themselves? Through this lense, our team can easily learn ideas regarding our very own weakness and longings.

The All-Consuming Cravings: When the Giantess Consumes People

When our experts listen to tales of a giantess eating folks, it's challenging not to experience a coldness run down our spines. The idea of going to the grace of a creature therefore tremendous and also pressing take advantage of primitive fears-- anxiety of fretfulness, fear of being actually overthrown. However why do these tales sound a great deal along with our company?

The Beginnings of Big Myths

The principle of giants is actually much from new. Historical societies all over continents have shared accounts regarding massive beings that strolled one of mortals. In Norse mythology, there is actually Jotunheim, home to the giants-- Jotunns-- who typically clashed with gods like Thor. In a similar way, in Greek mythology, we possess the Titans.

Cultural Significance

Giant folklores fulfill various functionalities in their particular cultures:

Moral Lessons: Numerous stories include giants as antagonists that work with chaos or even destruction. Personification of Nature: Giants usually symbolize organic forces past individual control. Social Commentary: The disparity between giants and mortals can easily mirror societal hierarchies. Psychological Underpinnings

What drives the story of "the giantess consumes individuals"? At its primary exists an allegorical exploration of power aspects-- the exchange between stamina and vulnerability.

Fear & Fascination

People are actually attracted to what intimidates all of them. The allure depends on:

Exploration of Power: The giantess symbolizes best electrical power over her victims. Vicarious Experience: Viewers may indulge their darkest worries without real consequences. The Giantess Wants Feet Worshipped

In many interpretations of giantess mythology, there's an interesting part relating to praise-- particularly feet praise. This facet discloses much deeper coatings within these narratives.

Symbolism of Tootsies in Mythology

Feet usually signify grounding--

[encyclopika]

Animal Crossing Fish Dish Friday - #18

Brought to you by a marine biologist with pen and ink...

CLICK HERE FOR THE AC FISH EXPLAINED MASTERPOST!

Squid Ink Curry

In ACNH: 1. Catch a Squid. 2. Cook at a stove with 3 Flour & 1 Squid

In Real Life: from India

Fish of Choice: There are two squid ink dishes in ACNH, but IRL, ink is usually collected from cuttlefish, although squid are sometimes used. Anyway, it is more accurately called "cephalopod ink".

Other Ingredients: The thing about curry is that it's defined by the "curry spices" used, and not really the base, which appears to be anything you want that will create some sort of sauce.

Here's a recipe that looks pretty good!

Mollusca is such a crazy group of animals. It's still hard to wrap my head around the fact that cephalopods - octopuses, squid, cuttlefish and all their various tentacled friends - are related to bivalves, like clams and oysters. They just...seem so distant from each other! And yeah, I've known this fact for 20+ years, but there's that magic that keeps driving me back to biology in general. To be honest, this relation is even more crazy to me than the cow and whale relation - at least those two both have eyes and are very mammal, y'know? Between a squid and a clam, they couldn't be more different - the disparity between their intelligence and body plans in crazy.

One of the most obvious differences is, of course, that one of them has a shell and the other one doesn't. That's so obvious, right?

WRONG*.

(*OK, not completely wrong - the majority of octopuses don't have shells, but the other cephalopods do!)

Just like with fish, you can clean and cut your own squid for dinner - very often, if you go to the fish market, you're going to see whole squid for sale. Get them. They are an extremely versatile (and sustainable!) protein (my friend at work makes a stuffed squid that is soooo good, but you can just make fried calamari, or throw some cut squid "noodles" into soup. Endless possibilities!). When you go to clean your squid, you'll notice that this soft-bodied animal has a stiffening rod in its body called the "pen". You'll obviously remove this, because no one wants to chew on toenail. And whoever named this structure was on fire - calling this thin structure the pen when squid make ink? Amazing. (It's also called the gladius, but pen is better. Sorry not sorry.)

Pens come in many shapes and sizes!

The origin of the pen is actually the remnants of the cephalopod shell in decapodiformes, the squid, and one octopodiforme, the vampire squid. Just like their cousins, the clams and the snails, cephalopods of the past had shells - just look at the ammonites and the still-alive nautilus. Squid traded their shell defenses for maneuverability and speed, but they didn't lose them completely! Same for cuttlefish which have a similar structure called a "cuttlebone".

And there you have it! Bon appetite!

[pacific-rimbaud]

Drabble #39: "Hey! I was gonna eat that."

by PacificRimbaud for @grangerdangerfics​ 

Rated M for language and sexual references

Pairing: Pansy Parkinson x Michael Corner

Tags: High School AU, Non-magical AU, discussion of teen sex

"Cocoa Puffs. Nice."

Michael, folded in half and pushing a half-gallon carton of Minute Maid aside to grab the milk, stood up quickly, cracking the top of his head on the ceiling of the refrigerator.

"Shit!" The gallon jug of milk hung from the index finger of one hand, and he rubbed the top of his scalp with the other.

He'd entirely forgotten that it had been Spirit Day, but he was reminded of it by the sight of Pansy closing his sliding back door behind herself, her twiggy legs poking out from the ass-grazing hem of her cheer skirt.

"Can you knock?" he asked, pulling the plastic seal from the cap of the milk. "Is that something you've got stashed away in your grossly under-tapped skill set? Or do you just do pom poms now?"

"Mom says I don't have to." She parked herself on the bar stool Michael had intended to sit on at the kitchen island.

"My mom or your mom?"

"Your mom."

He sat down at the opposite end of the bar, reached over to hook a fingertip into the edge of the bowl of Cocoa Puffs sitting in front of Pansy, and dragged it across the counter toward himself.

An enormous bow, purple with white polka dots, sat at the top of her head, crowning her blunt black bob. Her eyelids were shaded to match. Michael thought he smelled artificial grape, and wondered if it was her lip gloss.

"Why are you in my house, Minnie Mouse?" He poured milk over his cereal, then walked back to the fridge to put it away. Bent over again, he heard the distinctive sound of ceramic scraping across granite, and turned around to find Pansy with his bowl back in front of her and his spoon in her hand, chewing earnestly.

"Hey.” He gestured pointlessly at the bowl. “I was gonna eat that."

She waved at him. "Move on. I have a favor to ask you."

Michael pulled another bowl from the cupboard. "You mean besides letting you eat my cereal?"

She nodded, jamming a spoonful into her grape-flavored mouth.

"I need you to start fucking me after school."

Michael froze.

"Excuse me?"

As she waved her hand again, he fixated on her gleaming purple manicure. Each of her nails was a completely smooth oval.

"It's perfect. I checked, and cheer practice lines up almost exactly with robot group–"

"Robotics club."

"Fucking Legobots clubhouse, and mom doesn't get home until 6:15."

"My mom or your mom?"

"My mom. Your mom gets home at 5:45, so that’s another half an hour at my house, which we might need, I don't know. Anyway, like I said, you're right next door, it's perfect." She took another bite of Michael's cereal.

Carefully, deliberately, he set his new bowl down at his new spot at the island, and sat down.

Slowly, methodically, he filled it to the brim with Cocoa Puffs.

“Is this like a fake dating thing? Are you trying to get Draco back by pretending we’re sleeping together or something?”

Pansy shook her head. “No. It’s the opposite of that. We’re going to have real sex, but no one will know about it. And I’m still not talking to you at school.” She’d finished chasing the last globes of cereal around in her milk, and grabbed the box to top off her bowl.

Michael could feel himself glitching.

“Sex.”

“Yes, Michael.”

“With me.”

“Yes, Michael.”

He rebooted. “Why me?”

“It just makes sense. We’ve already seen each other naked,” she said. “Taken baths together. Slept in the same bed.”

“Yes, when we were two.”

He thought about the photo albums on the shelves in the TV room, and the series of photographs taken of her and Michael standing in a plastic pool in the backyard, arms looped around one another’s shoulders, wearing nothing but My Little Pony and Spider-man underpants, respectively, Michael squinting in the sun, Pansy in pink star-shaped plastic sunglasses, tongue out and hip cocked to one side.

“You can sleep with literally any guy at school. And not to be an asshole, like, get it, for sure, but my understanding is that you kind of do.”

She turned toward him with a look of unfiltered excitement and pointed the bowl of her spoon at him. “That’s exactly it. I don’t. But Cassius—”

“Cassius Warrington?”

“Mm hm.”

Cassius Warrington had graduated two years earlier, and now played college football in a very high-profile way.

“I’ve been texting with Cassius, and Daphne was messing around and said something to his sister who told Graham Montague who told Cassius that I’m incredible.”

Michael blinked. “Incredible at having sex?”

“Yes.”

His eyes narrowed. “Are you...not?”

“No! I’ve never done it.”

He looked down into the detritus of cereal powder floating in his now-brown milk, and suddenly short on appetite, dropped his spoon in his bowl.

“But I thought you and Draco, you know, for what, three and a half years…?”

He wondered why he’d felt the need to specify the half.

“His parents are so weird about all that purity stuff. He went down on me constantly, but that’s as far as it went. But no, I haven’t had intercourse.”

“So...you’re asking me to have intercourse with you, so you can have intercourse with your boyfriend?”

“He’s not my boyfriend yet, but basically, yes.”

Michael suddenly felt defensive.

“Why would you think I’d want to do this?”

Pansy stared at him, then waved a hand down the length of her body.

She was all soft, flawless skin and dark hair and big eyes and long legs and…

Michael breathed out.

“Because I’m me,” she said. “And you get intercourse, Michael. Until I’m good at it.”

“Isn’t that a big deal, though? Like don’t you want to have feelings with whoever you have sex with for the first time?”

“That’s exactly the problem. What do you think of when I say ‘virginity’?”

“I mean, it’s a social and not a biological construct, and there are some pretty gross gender disparities—”

“Exactly. That’s why you’re perfect. I don’t want some guy who thinks putting his dick in me is the equivalent of typing ‘First!’ in the comments.”

“And you think Cassius will be? Why date him then?”

“He’s 6’5”. But you’re an analytical nerd, you’re fucking hot, you’re definitely not going to tell anyone, you’re single—”

“What makes you think I’m single?” He paused. “You think I’m hot?”

She only rolled her eyes. “And yes, the double standards are unbelievably fucking annoying,” she said. “Did you?”

“Did I what?”

“Have feelings the first time?”

He swallowed, and pushed the cereal further away.

“I haven’t done it either.”

Pansy and her grape lip gloss stood up abruptly from the bar stool.

He wasn’t tall, exactly, and she wasn’t short, exactly, but when she and her tiny skirt stepped between his parted knees, something about the way she was still a little shorter than him while he was sitting down triggered a rush of adrenaline, and his gut promptly became a thriving butterfly preserve.

“Are you―what, like, right now?” he asked.

He’d been steadily leaning toward saying yes, but if he did, there was a lot of research he’d want to do between now and the actual opening ceremonies.

“No, fucking dork.” Pansy rolled her eyes, and patted her hands against his knees. “My parents are out of town next weekend, and Cassius is gone for an away game, so he’ll be too busy to text.” She smiled, and it was something less like the Cheshire smirk she flashed at her friends across the quad, and more like the way she used to look when they tore open their first Otter Pops in Michael’s back yard every summer, until they’d turned twelve and both moved on.

“We’re going to be so bad,” she said. “But that’s fine.”

“I hope not. I mean...if we...I’d try. Obviously. To not be bad.”

“It’s not like AP Calculus.”

“No, I don’t imagine it’s anything like AP Calculus.”

Michael glanced at her mouth, glistening and faintly purple, and Pansy’s eyes widened.

Fuck it, he thought.

He settled one hand at her hip and the other at the back of her neck, and then he kissed her.

They separated a full minute later, both breathless.

Oh, Michael thought.

“Oh,” she said.

“Next weekend?” he asked, hand tightening over her hip. “Like, what time?”

“I guess...” She stared at Michael’s lips, and her hips tilted forward. “Whenever.”

Oh, fuck.

[hormonalharmonyhb]

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Reviews

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Reviews - Does Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Really Work? ReviewHormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Reviews - Advanced Hormone Balance Support Ingredients For Both Men And Mens!! Read Real Customers Reviews Before You Try.

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Reviews - Hormone Balance Ingredients

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Reviews - Advanced Hormone Balance Support Ingredients For Both Men And Mens!! Read Real Customers Reviews Before You Try.

This is the 2021 updated Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement reviews report and where to buy Hormonal Harmony HB-5 pills; published by DietCare Reviews.

Click to Order Now

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Review

Hormones play a critical role in the well-being of men & women. A little hormonal imbalance will create disorder on women's health.

It's important to regulate these hormones. For this cause, after thorough research and testing, a well-known Hormonal Harmony company developed Hormonal Harmony HB-5 as a potent hormone help supplement. Built with Dr Woods' aid, it claims to regulate hormones and helps women lose weight, promotes general and skin health.

What is Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement

Users would know that dropping the excess pounds is tough if they try different diets and workouts. There are many reasons why users might not lose weight.

There are just those of them, overeating and lack of physical exercise. Dr. Woods supplement may answer another significant explanation for weight gain in this article: hormonal imbalance.

Besides, many people will speak to users about Hormonal Harmony HB5 and how it can help counteract hormone development that is inadequate or unnecessary. This easy-to-use stimulus may be the key to unlocking the hormones to make it easier to burn fat rapidly!

People struggle to lose weight as they hit the age of 30+. It's not like they don't try to. According to Dr. Woods, that's because of the hormones they get. They need a nutritional supplement that fixes the root cause to fix the issue.

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 is a nutritional supplement that resolves five hormonal barriers that stop weight loss in the body. HB5 is healthy for all since it is made from natural ingredients of high quality.

Reviews of HB5 Hormonal Harmony confirm that it is a supplement for fat burning that includes enhancements to improve metabolism. This suggests that the more energy users have the more calories users will burn during the day. As a result, users will very quickly lose a lot of weight.

Click to Order Now

How does Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement Work?

As the ideal hormone balance and a trusted and potent weight loss formula, Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement functions efficiently. Dr Woods adds that this supplement is based on the idea of the body's five hormonal blocks.

This formula increases the hormones' overall role that helps to give users the perfect shape they want. This powerful formula works for everyone of any age as it corrects the functioning of the hormones within the body.

This product enhances the complexion of the skin, which naturally brightens and softens the skin. It boosts the outlook and makes users feel energized.

For anyone of any age, this dietary supplement preserves hormonal equilibrium and encourages successful weight loss.

According to the official website, the five precise hormones that function exactly are as follows:

Thyroid-The hormones t3 and t4 that function in the metabolic process, plays an essential role in weight loss. This advanced hormone support helps to activate the metabolism that turns fat into energy more rapidly.

Insulin-This combination also increases insulin's active hormone, which quicker transforms sugars into glucose as an energy source. This supplement battles this problem because it restores the natural development of insulin.

Cortisol is the tension hormone that enlightens successful weight control strategies for users. It lowers excess cortisol output and lets users lose weight by reducing the production of cortisol by enhancing the mood by reducing anxiety and stress.

Estrogen is often present in the female body, where the receptors are balanced with estrogen, and estrogen is fucked up. This product strengthens the equilibrium of the two hormones and corrects estrogen's action to minimize weight gain.

Leptin is one of the hormones of fullness that is mainly responsible for signaling our brain, increasing the appetite for success and helping users pack on more weight. It regulates the appetite and, by enhancing the activity of the leptin hormone, suppresses the cravings.

The Major Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Ingredients Used

Within every single capsule of the supplement, users can find the specific and robust formulation of ingredients made natural and successful in unclogging the blocked hormones. After all, the Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement includes:

Kelp: It is high in iodine and aims to improve the T3 and T4 thyroid hormones. This stimulates the metabolism and boosts the cells.

African Mango: It aims to increase body weight and balance the amount of leptin.

Rhodiola Rosea: It has been known to prevent tension, release cortisol, and promote fat burning in the body.

Cinnamon: It aims to maintain safe levels of insulin, blood sugar and cholesterol. It will lower the BMI and regulate the levels of estrogen.

Red Ginseng: Depression and cortisol can be prevented by this root extract. It increases the results of weight loss as well.

Diindolylmethane (DIM): It is present in vegetables that can regulate estrogen and balance estrogen and progesterone, such as cauliflower and broccoli.

Click to Order Now

Benefits of Hormonal Harmony HB-5

All Hormonal Harmony HB-5 customer reviews are positive. Hormonal Equilibrium HB5 can guarantee that the path to weight loss will not be disrupted by hormonal imbalance. The changes it will carry will be life-changing if users plan to take this supplement.

Here are some of the advantages of HB5 Hormonal Harmony Supplement:

· Enhanced mood and overall quality of life

Users feel as young as ever with excellent weight loss and revitalized energy levels! This significant transformation would have beneficial impacts on emotional health and life outlook. · Maintains hormones at an optimum amount conducive to losing weight

A critical determinant of the rate of weight loss is hormonal imbalance. Hormone imbalance or overload can negatively affect the absorption of food nutrients and fat in the body. To encourage accelerated fat burning, HB5 makes sure that the body is loaded with the right hormones. No further efforts called to waste by hormone disparity of diets and exercises!

· Raising amounts of energy

More available energy can be produced by increased fat burning. It gives users more motivation to do the stuff users enjoy. Outside of striving obsessively to shed the stubborn weight, users will rediscover existence.

· Face Complexion improves

Estrogen modulates skin physiology, elasticity, and vascularity significantly. An estrogen deficiency can cause wrinkles and sag to grow in the skin. HB5 requires DIM, which is believed to raise levels of estrogen. Reverse the wheel of time and, with HB5, get glowing, youthful skin!

How to Use Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement

HB5 comes in a capsule form, and maybe a versatile form of a supplement. For consumption of this substance, no measurements or preparations are needed. All users have to do is pop a pill in the mouth, put it down with water, and users are all right to go!

For speedy results, the manufacturers suggest taking 3 small capsules per day. With or without meals, a buyer may accept this supplement.

On average, users affirm that they can note the medication's benefits just days after first use. It will help users burn more calories, boost their mood, and reduce brain fog by drinking 1 bottle of HB5. Engaging to take HB5 Hormonal Harmony for 30 days will give users outstanding performance. For years to come, the more users use HB5. The happier life can be.

The full 30-day supply is contained in of bottle of Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement. Three bottles of this supplement will turn the health and beauty for the better, amazingly. The product will replenish the hormones entirely with 6 bottles, and users will feel like young and fit human!

If this supplement is used along with a healthy diet and a great fitness regimen, it can have more impressive results. Suppose users want to tone the newly noticeable muscles due to fat loss. In that case, it will dramatically help users achieve the established physique by doing aerobic exercises such as lifting weights!

One could need a dietary adjustment to guarantee that the significant health effects of Hormonal Harmony HB-5 are maintained even through old age. Having healthy decisions will reduce the risk later in the life of contracting diseases.

Does the Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement really work? Find out here

Is Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Safe and Reliable?

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 is a potent fat-burning recipe for hormonal help, comprising thirteen powerful natural ingredients. To take off all the extra weight, users will find equilibrium in the hormones, and it also helps the skin tone better.

Without giving users some adverse effects, this supplement restores the mindset and revitalizes energy levels for better.This supplement helps to improve metabolism and protects the body from adding more weight.

It regulates the hormones and makes women shed more pounds, enhancing the skin's general health and function.

Pricing and Where to Buy Hormonal Harmony HB-5

At this time, Hormonal Harmony HB-5 is only available on the official website It comes in three different bundles, and users can pick the package that suits users. Place the order online, and the shipping will take place on the same day.

There are 90 capsules in one single tube, and they cost around $69.

If users order 3 bottles, $59 would be the price of each bottle.

The cost of a bottle comes down to $49 if users plan to buy 6 bottles.

Who Should Avoid Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Supplement?

HB5 is a reasonably safe replacement to take, but it does not suggest that only anyone can do it.

Best off refraining from HB5 are the following individuals:

This supplement is specially designed to help awaken the hormones in some persons. This supplement should not be used by people aged under 18 years old. The effects on children of this supplement are not thoroughly investigated.

Women who are pregnant and breastfeeding should refrain from attempting HB5. The consequences on both mother and baby of this supplement are not known.

This supplement could worsen the allergic reactions if users are allergic to any of the ingredients specified. Before agreeing to pursue this medicine, it is best to get the doctor's signal first.

It is best to refrain from HB5 while users are taking prescription medications. This supplement could mess with the drug's mechanism of action, and it may do more harm than good. Before buying HB5, check with the doctor first.

If users have severe medical problems, do not take HB5 without a doctor receiving approval.

Buyers need to refrain from trying this supplement if they believe that they have an undiagnosed condition. It is best first to seek medical advice.

Hormonal Harmony HB-5 Reviews - Final Thoughts

In solving the root cause of the problem, Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement is a unique weight loss solution. It regulates the hormones and protects users from health complications with hormonal dysfunction. With Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement, users could lead a happy, lean and energetic life. It is easy to use and gives users a decisive improvement.

Before using some new supplement in the diet, people should remember to contact the medical practitioner. As it is sponsored by the return scheme to get back the investment or the health outcomes, users should rely on the supplement.

For the first 180 days after the order, users get a fantastic privilege of using this 100% money return guarantee. If the product does not please users or does not benefit users, users will immediately claim the 100% refund.

The supplements are indeed worth a try with a money-back guarantee scheme!

Act now and take full advantage of the Hormonal Harmony HB-5 supplement today by

Click to Order Now

[96thdayofrage]

Even beyond the subject matter—a long-unsolved lynching of a Black man in Georgia—Wesley Lowery’s recent story in GQ was jarring. The July feature has the hallmarks of classic true crime: the ambitious investigator, the zealous prosecutor, the family that would not let the case be forgotten. It’s a great story, squarely in the vein of other cold case classics, including Pamela Colloff’s “Unholy Act,” Matthew McGough’s “The Lazarus File,” and Robert Kolker’s “A Serial Killer in Common.” And yet it is, in one profound way, extremely unusual. Lowery, a Pulitzer Prize winner, is Black. And the true crime genre is very, very white.

True crime is, relatively speaking, small. None of the Big Five book publishers bothers with a dedicated imprint. But the genre wields outsize cultural sway far beyond publishing, especially since the success of 2014’s “Serial” podcast—about the highly contested homicide conviction of Adnan Syed in the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee in Baltimore County, Maryland—and HBO’s “The Jinx,” the 2015 docuseries about real estate heir Robert Durst and several homicides he is suspected of having committed. (Durst will stand trial for the December 2000 homicide of Susan Berman next year.) So it matters a great deal that most true crime focuses on white police officers and detectives, white victims, and white prosecutors working to avenge them—aimed, said Lowery, “at a presumed white audience.” He believes, rightly, that this is effectively a judgment about what constitutes a sympathetic victim.

I called Lowery not long ago to talk about that whiteness, which swamps the genre across books, magazines, newspapers, and podcasts—and how the color barrier has influenced Americans’ impression of crime itself.

Lowery noted that Samuel Little, perhaps one of the most prolific murderers in American history—he credits himself with 93 victims —remains relatively unknown. Serial killer-related content is extraordinarily popular among Americans; is it not unreasonable, Lowery wonders, to credit this ignorance to Little’s alleged victims—disproportionately Black women? Little’s confessions have been met with skepticism from some in law enforcement and journalism. Lowery said Little remaining under the cultural radar “speaks to the extent to which the subjective decisions that are made about what to portray in true crime is a financial decision, made based on what is presumed a white audience will care about.”

It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy, and has been for many years. The racial disparity is hard to quantify, but it’s surely been evident for the last two decades, before which true crime was regarded as trash. During each of those years, Mystery Writers of America bestowed its Edgar Awards. Among the categories: Best Fact Crime. Five or six books are nominated each year.

In the last 20 years, few nonwhite writers have been nominated in the category, and none have won. (In 2018, the organization rescinded an achievement award to disgraced Central Park Five prosecutor Linda Fairstein.)

Journalist Sarah Weinman’s latest anthology, “Unspeakable Acts: True Tales of Crime, Murder, Deceit, and Obsession”—in which I have story—features only one nonwhite writer and no Black writers. Weinman is aware that this absence reflects the genre itself. “When pain and trauma is grist for the entertainment mill, certain stories are, still, valued over others,” she wrote in a July essay for BuzzFeed News.

The implications of that value judgment are staggering. Think about what it means to have white writers tell the world about crime that, most often, affects Black people—or that white editors get to choose what crime is worth a book, a feature, a podcast. Think about how this skews some people’s perception of what even constitutes a crime.

It’s hard to overstate how inaccurate and damaging the results and perceptions created by so much whiteness has been. Generations of readers have been led to believe that murder victims most often are women killed by men and that Black serial murderers are rare. Neither assertion is true. According to the FBI, the majority of homicide victims are men killed by other men, and the race of serial murderers is commensurate with the racial makeup of the U.S. as a whole.

The fallout extends beyond misperception into policy, and it has for decades. For example, as Rachel Monroe detailed in her 2019 book “Savage Appetites,” the rise of the victims’ rights movement, led by the mother of Sharon Tate—a white actress whose murder at the hands of Manson Family members has been documented ad nauseam—led directly to the rights of defendants being restricted. The severity of punishment is rarely even questioned. “[True crime] frames the justice system as inherently just, and it frames long prison sentences as something to aspire toward,” says journalist Rachelle Hampton. “It very much sets up a neat line between us—people who are not incarcerated—and them, people who are incarcerated.”

To this day, reporters enable law enforcement to spread misleading statistics—to suggest, with scant evidence, that major cities, including New York, are suffering through an unprecedented rise in crime. That, too, is false.

“We end up misrepresenting what the world actually looks like,” says Lowery.

Or as Jean Murley, author of “The Rise of True Crime,” puts it: “Modern true crime is almost a fantasy genre.”

How did this happen? And what, if anything, can we do about it?

[gdelgiproducer]

DOTV AU: An Exercise in Alternate History (Part VII)

Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI offer more detailed context. (To briefly sum up why these posts are happening: alt history – as in sci fi, not “alternative facts” – buff, one day got the idea that DOTV could have turned out hella different if Jim Steinman looked for a star lead in other places, decided to reason out how that might work.) This is still getting a good response, so I’m gonna keep the train rolling.

Parts of the AU timeline established so far:

Instead of stopping at recording two songs from Whistle Down the Wind on a greatest hits compilation, Meat Loaf wound up taking more of an interest in Steinman’s new theater work than he did in our timeline, and through a series of circumstances found himself volunteering to play Krolock in the impending DOTV when Jim poured out his woes to him about needing to find some sort of star to attract investors. At a loss for any better ideas, Jim accepted Meat’s impulsive proposal, but not without resistance from his manager, David Sonenberg, who proposed Michael Crawford as an alternate candidate. Through quick thinking on Meat’s part, and inspiration on Jim’s, Crawford left the room accepting an entirely different role than he walked in hoping to get, leaving Krolock still open for Meat.

There was a brief speed bump, when Meat disliked Jim’s English script for the show, but after meeting with the original German author Michael Kunze and convincing Jim to compromise, things were on the road to being back on track… at least until 9/11 occurred.

Following a brief hiatus, everyone involved met to re-assess their options. The current game-plan was to put the new script on paper, schmooze with potential investors or producers, and put together a new creative team. Preferably not all at the same time, but with the crunch on, they’d do whatever needed to be done.

So far, the schmoozing has gone well, but everybody that Meat, Jim, and the crew would like to be involved is tentative. The newest conclusion is that they need to show them there’s a working show, and a concert of selections from the score seems to be the route they’re taking, possibly financed by an unlikely source.

Continuing the alternate DOTV timeline, a little differently this time! This time we get a feature on the concert from the New York Post’s own Michael Riedel. Take it away!

VAMPIRES: NEW MUSICAL BLOOD by Michael Riedel

If you’ve heard the buzz on the Rialto of late, you’d be forgiven for wondering if you were having a particularly nasty acid flashback. Dance of the Vampires, a new $15 million musical of the macabre based on the 1967 Roman Polanski movie The Fearless Vampire Killers, is already a monster hit in Austria and Germany, and it’s starting to gather steam here in the States as well, with some... we’ll call it unlikely... star power attached. After all, what other musical (even in a preliminary concert presentation) can boast Courtney Love as an emcee slash investor, and such disparate names as Meat Loaf and Michael Crawford as co-headliners?

Admittedly, Meat Loaf’s presence is slightly less surprising, as the driving force behind the show is Jim Steinman, who wrote Mr. Loaf’s classic Bat Out of Hell albums as well as the lyrics for Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Whistle Down the Wind.  He has written the score and is co-adapting the book for Vampires with playwright David Ives (All in the Timing), who is also currently at work with Steinman for Warner Bros. on a musical version of Batman, from German dramatist Michael Kunze’s original script. He also co-directed this concert with Starmites composer Barry Keating, though early reports that Steinman would be co-directing the eventual Broadway run with Jane Eyre creator John Caird have ultimately been dismissed.

“Roman directed it in Vienna, but he can’t work here because of his legal problems,” Steinman said, referring to Polanski’s indictment for statutory rape in the 1970′s. “He may be the first director who can’t work over here because of a statutory rape charge.” When queried about who then would be directing the New York run, Steinman was tight-lipped, but among those in attendance at the evening’s proceedings was Urinetown’s Tony-winning helmer, John Rando, who is now rumored to be in talks for the slot. Said Rando of the new show, “It takes the vampire myth and pokes fun at it, but it also embraces it. Its message is about the excesses of appetite. It has wit and an edge to it. I’d love to be involved!”

The presentation (at the 499-seat Little Shubert Theatre, about half a mile west of Broadway; events like this cause us rightfully to wonder why it doesn’t see more use) for a by-invitation-only crowd was kicked off by Ms. Love, Hole rocker and widow of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain, in memorable form. Says a source in attendance, “You could sum it up in two words: too drunk. She was literally falling over. She wasn’t coherent at all.” Managing to gather herself enough to announce that Dance of the Vampires is a musical for people “who think musicals suck,” she didn’t manage to say much else of importance. “It just became a little too sloppy, and she was removed.” Insiders report that Steinman’s manager, David Sonenberg, who is also one of the show’s producers (and a first-timer at that), worried that those involved would be seen as taking advantage of a troubled addict. Ms. Love’s performance did little to dispel this perception. Lucky that representatives from noted L.A.-based promoter Concerts West, major music manager Irving Azoff (who numbers The Eagles, REO Speedwagon, Journey, Christina Aguilera, and Sammy Hagar among his clients), film and music mogul Jerry Weintraub, and Broadway’s own Barry and Fran Weissler were in attendance; a cash infusion from such sources may well be needed to save face if she can’t “live through this,” to twist a phrase from her 1994 album of the same name.

In addition to Sonenberg, already attached to Vampires on the producing side are Andrew Braunsberg (another first-timer, who also produced Polanski’s 1971 film version of Macbeth), Leonard Soloway, Bob Boyett (Sweet Smell of Success, Topdog/Underdog), Lawrence Horowitz (Electra, It Ain’t Nothing But the Blues), and Barry Diller and Bill Haber’s USA Ostar Theatricals. Boyett, a TV producer turned legit entrepreneur, used the phrases “trial by fire” and “going to war,” perhaps because while some novice producers just put up the money, get the credit and run, Boyett says he’s been taking the process very seriously: “I went to all the meetings and learned, like it was grad school.” While some Hollywood types find Broadway “less cutthroat,” Boyett finds it “more restrictive.” He mentions the sheer physical space of the theaters but also all the rules and regulations: "I’ve dealt with unions all my life, but I do find Actors’ Equity is very restrictive to the creative process.” Further, he regrets that Vampires will not have an out-of-town tryout. “I loved the experience of taking Sweet Smell of Success to Chicago,” he says with real enthusiasm, as if the project ended happily. “It was helpful to have the critics say what they did.” Not that Boyett thinks the right message from the critics got to the creative team. 

As for Boyett’s teammates, Bill Haber attended on behalf of USA Ostar, and although he wouldn’t consent to a formal interview, he couldn’t resist answering one question -- and it has nothing to do with Dance of the Vampires. Why is Haber’s other fall production, Imaginary Friends by Nora Ephron, being called a play if it has six songs by Marvin Hamlisch and Craig Carnelia? “It has nothing to do with how many songs there are,” he shot back. “It has to do with the fact that if you took all the songs out, it still works and you still have a play.”

And all this before we even get to the show itself. Vampires is your typical erotic musical about an innocent girl (played this evening by impressive newcomer Mandy Gonzalez, currently standing by for the role of Amneris in Aida and late of Off-Broadway’s Eli’s Comin’) choosing between two lovers, in this case an older, aristocratic vampire (Loaf, whose appearance here marks the first time he has worked with Steinman in theater since the early Seventies) and a hunky young grad student (Max von Essen, who reportedly also appeared in the Steinman/Caird-helmed reading in April 2001) under the tutelage of a rather intensely wacky vampire hunter (Crawford). Given the level of Loaf’s obvious commitment to the piece, it is surprising that his manager (Allen Kovac, of Left Bank Management) was a no-show, and in that light, rumors that Loaf has yet to formally sign on the dotted line for Vampires (in spite of previous announcements to the contrary, no less) prove even more curious. Calls to Kovac’s office were not returned. The rest of the cast, boasting some fine voices indeed, was filled out by assorted Broadway names and members of Meat Loaf’s long-time touring band, The Neverland Express, which also provided accompaniment for the evening under the crisp musical direction of veteran rock bassist Kasim Sulton (best known for his work with Todd Rundgren and Utopia, among others).

Speaking of the music: the score, as per Steinman’s usual style, is appropriately big and Wagnerian, with plenty of luscious, operatic melodies, including one familiar favorite that sticks out like a sore thumb: Steinman’s famous “Total Eclipse of the Heart,” under whose operatic pretensions I swooned as a teenager. “I couldn’t resist using it,” he says of a song that goes, ‘Once upon time there was light in my life / But now there’s only love in the dark.’ “I actually wrote it for another vampire musical that was based on Nosferatu, but never got produced.” Close listening to the CD sampler for interested investors also reveals a rehash of the vigorous “Tonight Is What It Means to Be Young,” his song for the film Streets of Fire, which I saw in Los Angeles in 1984 and sent me racing along Mulholland Drive to keep up with the propulsive beat.

As for the new stuff, maybe 50′s rock ‘n’ roll with a 70′s preen isn’t what the 80-year-olds who constitute Broadway’s audience want to hear (and Jim’s rock-mock-Wagnerian shtick admittedly tends to play better in London and Las Vegas than in Manhattan), but my sources say they knew from the first number --  an angelic trio with a beguiling (what did they used to call it?) melody and some expert (the Andrews Sisters used to do it) harmony -- that this would be my kind of score. Frankly I’m glad; since the prehistoric vinyl days, Steinman has been the guy I keep calling for to rejuvenate, or just plain juvenate, the Broadway musical, in a world where the musical theater establishment pronounces old ABBA records a hip pop sound.

The book, while reportedly in better shape than the April reading, is something else again. From the excerpts on display last night, the mix of bawdy humor and eroticism still needs fine-tuning. Says Sonenberg, “By the time we open, it will be a new version of the show, significantly changed with a view toward a New York audience, but right now it plays very much like the original in several respects.” Adds David Ives, “The German production is probably more faithful to the film, but it’s a fairly humorless show, with people getting hit on the head with salami. And I’ve been brought in to take out the salami and put in the chorus girls, without veering into camp in the process. Now it’s just a question of finding the balance, which, needless to say, isn’t easy. But I like what we’ve accomplished so far: Meat’s character is vastly different, a much more multifaceted, dynamic, complete figure. We’ve also made other changes and cuts and restructured the show into a book musical, with dialogue; the original is all sung. I think we’ve made it a much more interesting story.”

Time, as always, will be the ultimate arbiter of fate.

[feywildatheart]

Nenîth,

We had such a good time at our lunch! Of course, as soon as everyone started showing up, Elyn started calling it a party, like she knew that word would send a flock of butterflies flitting about in my stomach and she didn't want to use it until our friends had come and I couldn't flee without my absence being noticed. And she probably wasn't wrong. But in any case, it was nothing like the parties we attended on Rugira Prime, and I'm glad for it. Cloudleaper begged off of attending, unfortunately, because she'd come down with a sore throat, but Elyn and I went and there was such good food, and Drime wouldn't let us help with any of it, and as soon as the kids arrived Jesson started running around eagerly saying hello to everyone, and Squirt and I went over to greet him and let him get some scritches in.

While we were doing that, apparently Niko found Elyn and gifted her with the fabric we'd seen on the loom when we'd stopped by her place -- all that talk downplaying it, saying it wasn't much to look at, and it turns out it was a gift all along! Elyn's brother, Tyko, apparently got in contact with her, and between them and some help from one of the scientists Elyn befriended on Honione (my head positively swims thinking about all these friends, spread on separate planets in disparate parts of the galaxy, coming together to do this thing for Elyn, and she looked like her head was swimming at the thought of it, too), Niko wove that cloth to be conductive, so that Elyn could use it to upgrade her gloves. She came over to find me and show it to me after, I think, she'd finished exclaiming over it to Niko, and we spent a few moments just clamoring about how lovely and thoughtful it was, and the children and I listened eagerly while Elyn started telling us about the plans she had for it and the sort of things she could do with it. For as long as we've been traveling together, I'm afraid I still didn't understand half the things she was talking about, and she already looked like her thoughts were spinning off ten steps ahead of her mouth so I didn't want to stop her to ask her to explain anything, but it was nice just to see her so excited and enthusiastic about it all.

We spent some time just catching up with people, at the start, but Elyn noticed Lorraine looking a little haggard as she ran after Jesson, trying to corral him, and so Elyn swooped in and distracted him with a story about tiefling birthday party dances that she learned from Tyko. Jesson wanted her to teach him how to do them, and I chimed in that I'd love to learn too, although apparently they're at least related to the dance she taught me when we got drunk together on Sumula Station, so I had a head start on learning it and was glad for it. (Elyn, when I said as much, tried to protest that I was light on my feet and should be good at it, but I reminded her that no one who'd seen us trip all over ourselves with Daisy would believe so.) Jesson threw himself into it with more enthusiasm than grace, but it was delightful to watch, and it was good just to be dancing with friends and in a place where we didn't have the fate of a child or a city or a king's life hanging on the balance of whether we executed the steps right or not.

Elyn taught us another dance, too, an elven wedding dance called the Funky Griffin that was great fun, and had us all in peals of laughter, and then I encouraged Niko to share some of her people's dances with us. She seemed a little reluctant at first, and said that they really were better suited to her home plane, but she tried to give us a demonstration all the same, and if what we got was the less impressive version then I can't even imagine what the real thing looks like, because it was lovely and graceful and had my jaw on the floor right from the start, as she jumped and leaped about the place.

Elyn and I taught everyone one of the simpler Mashoy dances that we'd learned, too, though she was better at remembering the steps than I was, I had to take my cue from her more than once. And probably anyone at the Fesdi's party would have turned their nose up at what we managed, but everyone seemed to be having fun, and if there'd been balconies to watch from I'd wager that the patterns we all made across the floor of Drime's in would have been just lovely all the same, even if they weren't quite what they were meant to be.

We all wore ourselves out with all the dancing, and worked up an appetite, and so we were all glad to collapse into chairs at the tables and have our lunch, I think. Ren was rather idly plucking out a tune while we all ate, but when they shifted from that into the opening notes of the Ballad of Perrick Starstriker, of course I had to hop up from the table and go over to sit near them and listen. They nudged me with their boot until I joined in, though I daresay their voice is better than mine. But it's a folk song, anyway, and meant to be sung by anyone who cares to, not just those with a clear fine voice and a bard's training. Some of the others joined in, too, or tried their best to on the chorus, when it's clear most of them don't know a word of Halfling. They did their best, though, and it was charming and delightful and made my heart swell so full I thought it might burst right out of my chest. It reminded me of home, of you, of all those times we sat close to one another in the night where there was no work left to be done for the day and we sang it, the three of us together. It made me so glad, even as it made me a little bit homesick. You wouldn't think I would be, when that was the closest to home I've felt in months. You'd think I'd have been more so on Rugira Prime, surrounded by all that heat and sand and not a tree in sight as far as the eye can see. But it was like getting a bite of your favorite food, and remembering all the reasons why it's your favorite, but then only getting that one bite when you want to eat the whole plate. It made me feel closer to home, and to you both, but without the twilight sky above us and your arms wrapped around me, it's only going to remind me how far away you really are.

This probably makes me sound like I'm sad or like I regret what I'm doing and the choices I've made, but I don't. Please don't think that. I had a wonderful time at the party and I was so very glad for all of it, even the singing. Especially the singing. I just wish there was a way to do what I need to and be with you both, all at the same time. Writing these letters to you helps, and I pore over every word you send back to me, but I miss the sound of your voices, and your faces, and the way your hair smells when I hug you tight.

Anyway! Here I tried to make this all less maudlin, and I just made it more so. Please don't worry about me, nenîth, I really am happy. I can be happy and miss you at the same time. I've just had too much time to myself, too much time to think, these past few days while the Seles Emsel has been taking us back to Mir, because Elyn has spent most of it holed up with her new fabric, testing and experimenting so she can figure out how to use it to upgrade her gloves, and I've been loathe to interrupt her at it. And Cloudleaper's fine company, but she's prone to abruptly start yelling at her LICD, so mostly it's just been Squirt and me keeping one another company, and I think that's probably just given me too much time to think and reflect and miss you. We'll be back on Mir within the next day or so, though, and then we'll likely have information from Athan and Kian, and smugglers to hunt down, and I'm sure we'll be so busy that we'll be wondering why we ever left Nosirion-1 and our friends and our little mini-vacation behind.

I love you both, with all my heart.

Maliah

[patriotsnet]

Why Republicans Are Wrong About Everything

New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-republicans-are-wrong-about-everything/

Why Republicans Are Wrong About Everything

Why So Many Republicans Cling To Trump

Saagar Enjeti: Trump, GOP, On Wrong Side Of EVERYTHING Since Coronavirus Began

Ben Shapiro got part of it right. A toxic mix of status anxiety, persecution fears, and echoes of the Civil War helps explain why they follow Trump into the abyss.

On September 17, 1862, over 10,000 Confederate soldiers were killed, wounded, or went missing in a single day at the Battle of Antietam. Very few of them came from slave-owning families, so why did they agree to give their lives in defense of human bondage?

I was reminded of this question when I noticed that Politico Playbook had recruited conservative celebrity and author Ben Shapiro;to explain why the vast majority of House Republicans voted not to impeach President Trump on Wednesday for sending a murderous mob after them on January 6. Politico was slammed by liberals for opening its best-known section to a conservative whos been charged with being bigoted and intolerant. But Shapiros explanation of the rallying around Trump during his final days wasnt totally off base. He was on to something about how Republicans see the world.

With Trump leaving office within a week, defending his incitement of an insurrection doesnt seem to be in the long-term self-interest of Republican officeholders.;But the Civil War example helps explain why people sometimes do very self-destructive things out of spite or insecurity.

White supremacy was such a consensus view at the time that Lincoln felt compelled to defend it.

Like the rebels at Antietam, no one wants to die for nothing.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

Why Are Republicans So Mean

Let’s state right off-the-bat that conservatives indeed have much to offer. In fact, the very notion of conservatism itself keeps us grounded in tradition and prevents our society from spinning into the chaos of constant flux that would surely result if we were to impetuously pursue every new liberal idea to spring forth from our fertile minds. And conservatives admirably believe in America, established order, family, freedom, and success. This all sounds wonderful.

But when it comes to other people who happen to be different from the establishment, Republicans seem to be downright mean and nasty.

We are constantly reminded of the meanness of Republicans over and over again. One recent example is evident in the xenophobic remarks of the Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump, who recently referred to Mexican and other immigrants as rapists and murderers.

Basic common sense, however, tells us that human beings are not any more or less violent based upon where on a map they happened to have been born. And the evidence in studies bears this out as well by indicating that immigrants are no more likely to be violent than members of the overall population. Makes sense.

But Republicans seem to harbor some sort of a fear of foreigners and an aversion against other kinds of people who are not part of the established in-group. Their view seems to be that these other people are not like us, they pose a threat to us , and thus automatically they should be regarded as enemies.

There Arent Real Forces Within The Gop Leading Change

There is some appetite for change within the GOP. In those 2024 polls, at least a third of Republicans either were supporting a GOP presidential candidate other than Trump or were undecided.;

In YouGov Blues polling, only about 40 percent of Republicans identified themselves as Trump Republicans. A recent survey from Fabrizio, Lee and Associates, a GOP-leaning firm that worked on Trumps presidential campaigns, found that about 40 percent of Republican voters didnt want Trump to continue to be a leader in the party. Those numbers dont necessarily mean that those voters want the GOP to change drastically. But there is a substantial number of Trump-skeptical/ready-to-move-on-from-Trump Republican voters. But that sentiment isnt really showing up in the Republican Partys actions during the last three months basically everything GOP officials in states and in Washington are doing lines up with the Trumpian approach. So what gives?;

related:Why The Recent Violence Against Asian Americans May Solidify Their Support Of Democrats Read more. »

It is hard to see Republicans changing course, even if a meaningful minority of voters in the party wants changes, without some elite institutions and powerful people in the party pushing a new vision. And its hard to see real anti-Trumpism forces emerging in the GOP right now.;

Don’t Miss: Republican Flag Pins

Reality Check : Biden Cant Be Fdr

Theres no question that Biden is swinging for the fences. Beyond the emerging bipartisan infrastructure bill, he has proposed a far-reaching series of programs that would collectively move the United States several steps closer to the kind of social democracy prevalent in most industrialized nations: free community college, big support for childcare and homebound seniors, a sharp increase in Medicaid, more people eligible for Medicare, a reinvigorated labor movement. It is why 100 days into the administration, NPR was asking a commonly heard question: Can Biden Join FDR and LBJ In The Democratic Party’s Pantheon?

But the FDR and LBJ examples show conclusively why visions of a transformational Biden agenda are so hard to turn into reality. In 1933, FDR had won a huge popular and electoral landslide, after which he had a three-to-one Democratic majority in the House and a 59-vote majority in the Senate. Similarly, LBJ in 1964 had won a massive popular and electoral vote landslide, along with a Senate with 69 Democrats and a House with 295. Last November, on the other hand, only 42,000 votes in three key states kept Trump from winning re-election. Democrats losses in the House whittled their margin down to mid-single digits. The Senate is 50-50.

Most Republicans Said That President Obama Should Be Impeached Because Of The 2012 Attack On The Us Consulate In Benghazi

Their own investigations, however, proved them wrong. Every Congressional inquiry, including those by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee, concluded that the Obama administration did nothing wrong regarding Benghazi, that there was no stand down order given, and that neither the President nor anyone in his administration lied about it. Each and every Republican investigation has reached this same conclusion, but Republicans continue to exploit this tragedy for political gain.

You May Like: How Long Has Trump Been In Politics

Nominating Mitt Romney For President

Despite the failure to grab the Senate, the GOP was still riding strong anti-Obamacare sentiment and voter frustration over the slow recovery from the Great Recession. Much of this was fueled by the Tea Party movement, which added a rare Republican grassroots element to the GOP.

When you think about it now, all of that made former Mitt Romney an extremely odd choice for the Republican nomination for president in 2012. He embodied the establishment GOP in almost every way. Romney had years as a hedge fund manager at Bain Capital on his resume at a time when most Americans were still blaming Wall Street for the nation’s economic woes. Worst of all, his universal health coverage plan enacted while he was governor of Massachusetts looked eerily like Obamacare. In fact, “Romneycare” was seen as one of the models the crafters of the Affordable Care Act used when they wrote the law. If the GOP wanted to put up a candidate who invigorated its anti-Obamacare and increasingly anti-establishment base, they couldn’t have missed the mark much more than they did with Mitt Romney.

Bidens Bill Is More Popular

We live in the middle of an era of tremendous polarization, yet Joe Bidens American Rescue Plan is shockingly popular. Its one of the most popular, least polarizing pieces of legislation in recent memory. According to a recent Politico/Morning Consultpoll, 76 percent of voters support Bidens plan, including a majority of Republicans.

Its worth noting that most polls show that 70 percent or so of Republicans believe Joe Biden is an illegitimate president. Therefore, a large segment of people who think Biden stole the election also supports his COVID and economic recovery plans.

Obamas Recovery Act was never this popular. A January 2009 Gallup poll found that the public favored Obamas plan 52 percent to 38 percent.

These are good numbers but nowhere near the sky-high popularity of the Biden plan. At the time of this poll, Obamas approval rating was hovering around 70 percent. Bidens plan is more popular than he is Bidens job approval is 52.8 per FiveThirtyEight. That disparity is evidence of Bidens COVID plan’s political durability and the dangerous game Republicans are playing by opposing it. People who dont like Biden but like his plan are the exact people who the Republicans need to win over to take back Congress.

Read Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans

Times Republicans Were Wrong

It’s no secret that politicians tend to use exaggerated political rhetoric to get people to vote for them. In recent decades, Republicans have repeatedly made very ominous predictions about the horrors that will result from Democratic policies while painting a rosy picture of what will result from Republican policies. Now we have the luxury of looking back over the years to examine those predictions and policies. Below, you will find twenty-one examples of times Republicans were blatantly wrong.

Taking The Perspective Of Others Proved To Be Really Hard

Why both Democrats and Republicans are wrong on inflation

The divide in the United States is wide, and one indication of that is how difficult our question proved for many thoughtful citizens. A 77-year-old Republican woman from Pennsylvania was typical of the voters who struggled with this question, telling us, This is really hard for me to even try to think like a devilcrat!, I am sorry but I in all honesty cannot answer this question. I cannot even wrap my mind around any reason they would be good for this country.

Similarly, a 53-year-old Republican from Virginia said, I honestly cannot even pretend to be a Democrat and try to come up with anything positive at all, but, I guess they would vote Democrat because they are illegal immigrants and they are promised many benefits to voting for that party. Also, just to follow what others are doing. And third would be just because they hate Trump so much. The picture she paints of the typical Democratic voter being an immigrant, who goes along with their party or simply hates Trump will seem like a strange caricature to most Democratic voters. But her answer seems to lack the animus of many.;;

Democrats struggled just as much as Republicans. A 33-year-old woman from California told said, i really am going to have a hard time doing this but then offered that Republicans are morally right as in values, going to protect us from terrorest and immigrants, going to create jobs.

Don’t Miss: What Color Ties Do Republicans Wear

Reality Check #: The Electoral College And The Senate Are Profoundly Undemocraticand Were Stuck With Them

Because the Constitution set up a state-by-state system for picking presidents, the massive Democratic majorities we now see in California and New York often mislead us about the partys national electoral prospects. In 2016, Hillary Clintons 3-million-vote plurality came entirely from California. In 2020, Bidens 7-million-vote edge came entirely from California and New York. These are largely what election experts call wasted votesDemocratic votes that dont, ultimately, help the Democrat to win. That imbalance explains why Trump won the Electoral College in 2016 and came within a handful of votes in three states from doing the same last November, despite his decisive popular-vote losses.

The response from aggrieved Democrats? Abolish the Electoral College! In practice, theyd need to get two-thirds of the House and Senate, and three-fourths of the state legislatures, to ditch the process that gives Republicans their only plausible chance these days to win the White House. Shortly after the 2016 election, Gallup found that Republican support for abolishing the electoral college had dropped to 19 percent. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a state-by-state scheme to effectively abolish the Electoral College without changing the Constitution, hasnt seen support from a single red or purple state.

Surrendering Before The Battle

The midterm elections of 2014 gave the Republicans control of the Senate that they should have won in 2010. But even before the new members took their oaths of office, then-Senate Majority Leader-elect Mitch McConnell promised never to trigger a government shutdown. That effectively took the sharpest arrow out of the GOP’s congressional quiver, and again relieved the greatest pressure the Republicans could have exercised against Obama.

Don’t Miss: Did Donald Trump Say Republicans Are The Dumbest Group Of Voters

Unified Republican Opposition To Obama’s Policies Helped Them Retake Congress In 2010 Here’s Why It May Not Work Again

When the House of Representatives passed President Bidens COVID-relief plan last weekend, every single Republican voted against it. Earlier this week, Senator John Thune, Mitch McConnells deputy, predicted that every Republican Senator would vote against the Biden plan. Thunes reasoning was typically cynical. He said the Republicans wanted to:

make the Democrats own a piece of legislation that I think is going to have long-term adverse consequences.

This was the latest example of Republicans saying the quiet part out loud. Thune is admitting they are making a bet that the Biden plan wont work, and Republicans can reap the political rewards of a sub-standard economy in 2022. This is the same bet the Republicans made in 2009 when they decided to oppose Barack Obamas efforts to address the financial crisis.

Politically, the 2009 bet paid off. The Republicans rode a wave of economic discontent to control of the House and a massive set of wins down-ballot that would impact politics for more than a decade. But just because it worked then doesnt mean it will work now. The Republicans may be making a massive miscalculation by re-fighting the last war.

Republicans Said President Obama Would Raise Taxes Sky High

It never happened. Income taxes for over 95% of Americans remained the same or lower than they were before Obama was elected. The only people whose income taxes increased were those who make more than $400,000 per year, and their taxes rose only 3%. For most Americans, taxes are still lower now than they were under Reagan.

Read Also: Trump Quote In People Magazine 1998

Blowing The Midterm Elections

The 2008 elections gave Barack Obama a clear win in the presidential election and the Democrats a filibuster-proof supermajority in Congress. They proceeded to spend that political capital almost entirely on passing Obamacare in a lengthy process that included a number of unusual compromises with their own party members, like the “Cornhusker Kickback” and controversial legislative tricks like the “deemed as passed” maneuver. All of this took place even as the Affordable Care Act failed to gain majority support in the polls.

That set the stage for a strong Republican advantage going into the 2010 midterm elections. On paper, the GOP did score a resounding victory, picking up 63 seats in the House of Representatives and a net gain of six seats in the Senate.

But Republicans blew a solid chance to retake the Senate. They put up weak candidates in several winnable races. They included Sharon Angle in Nevada, who was seen as too radical and managed to lose to then-incumbent Harry Reid despite his very weak approval ratings in his home state. Arch-abortion opponent Ken Buck won the GOP nomination in Colorado, . The biggest mistake of all was Christine O’Donnell in Delaware. O’Donnell lost after she became infamous for her revelation that she had once experimented with witchcraft.

As a result, the Democrats kept control of the Senate and the Republicans lost a chance to force Obama into what could have been a series of advantageous compromises over the next six years.

The Gop Is A Grave Threat To American Democracy

Unless and until Republicans summon the wit and the will to salvage the party, ruin will follow.

About the author: Peter Wehner is a contributing writer at The Atlantic and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He writes widely on political, cultural, religious, and national-security issues, and he is the author of The Death of Politics: How to Heal Our Frayed Republic After Trump.

The hope of many conservative critics of Donald Trump was that soon after his defeat, and especially in the aftermath of the January 6 insurrection, the Republican Party would snap back into its former shape. The Trump presidency would end up being no more than an ugly parenthesis. The GOP would distance itself from Trump and Trumpism, and become a normal party once again.

But that dream soon died. The Trump presidency might have been the first act in a longer and even darker political drama, in which the Republican Party is becoming more radicalized. How long this will last is an open question; whether it is happening is not.

To better grasp whats happening among 2020 Trump voters, I spoke with Sarah Longwell, a lifelong conservative and political strategist who is now the publisher of The Bulwark, a news and opinion website that is home to anti-Trump conservatives. She is also the founder of Republican Voters Against Trump, now the Republican Accountability Project.

Recommended Reading: Donald Trump People Magazine Article 1998

Prior To Going To War In Iraq Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld Optimistically Predicted The Iraq War Might Last Six Days Six Weeks I Doubt Six Months

What’s more, Vice-President Dick Cheney said we would be greeted as liberators by the Iraqi people after we overthrow Saddam.

They were both horribly wrong. Instead of six weeks or six months, the Iraq war lasted eight long and bloody years costing thousands of American lives. It led to an Iraqi civil war between the Sunnis and the Shiites that took hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives. Many Iraqi militia groups were formed to fight against the U.S. forces that occupied Iraq. Whats more, Al Qaeda, which did not exist in Iraq before the war, used the turmoil in Iraq to establish a new foothold in that country.

The Iraq war was arguably the most tragic foreign policy blunder in US history.

[falkenscreen]

“We’ve Seen A Real Appetite For Film” – Sydney Film Festival Online

“The response from our audience has been fantastic, we’ve seen a real appetite for film.”

With the Sydney Film Fest in full swing online Festival junkees and toe-dippers alike still get to enjoy the early-June staple amongst friends even if we’re a little further apart this year. With the annual ‘Europe! Voices of Women in Film’ strand now taking on an even stronger pride of place amidst a less expansive yet still premiere Program, with individual tickets and Fest passes now on sale, Sydney Film Festival Director Nashen Moodley sat down to talk 2020 and highlights.

“Europe! Voices of Women in Film, run in collaboration with European Film Promotion, showcases films from some of Europe’s most vital female filmmakers – many of whom we introduce to Australian audiences for the first time,” said Nashen. “From gripping Irish sci-fi thriller ‘Sea Fever’ to gritty German love story ‘Kids Run’ and daring Swedish drama ‘Charter,’ each film brings something unique to the Festival and enriches the overall program.”

Amidst the selection ‘Sea Fever,’ a flick that would likely have otherwise been programmed in the ‘Freak Me Out’ strand, stands out as a high point among both the retrospective and premiere selections. A mix of sci-fi, thriller, horror, fantasy and folklore set far off the west coast of Ireland (our full review here), there’s a fair amount of emerging talent behind and in front of the camera worth having on your radar.

‘Kids Run,’ covering the career and life of an amateur boxer and struggling father of three, hits a lot of the strides of many a familiar fight flick; notably excelling in it’s final, sport-centric stretch when a key contest turns on a beat novel to boxing dramas making much better use of the ring as an analogy for perseverance, as is commonly the case, than most.

‘Charter,’ likewise about a struggling parent, the fallout of a broken relationship and too benefiting greatly from well-cast child actors, navigates contentious and deliberately nebulous material sometimes to great effect and inevitably wildly different interpretations. One karaoke sequence, appearing at the outset as if characters are pointedly going to sing their feelings to the audience and all concerned, turns out to be one of the best in show; doing well to tease out the dynamic between the three family members (see here for further coverage).

‘Our Law,’ a highlight of the program and an Australian entry, has deservedly garnered much attention amidst rising awareness of racial prejudice and disparity in Australia and across the globe following the reported tragic deaths of Indigenous Australians, African Americans at the hands of Police Officers and the Black Lives Matter and related protests.

Created prior to most recent events (see here for our interview with Director Cornel Ozies), the film is instructive in how cultural sensitivity, knowledge of communities and use of language can be beneficial to law enforcement; chronicling examples of regular challenges and personal hurdles faced by two Western Australian Officers.  

“’Our Law’ explores the nature of Police work from the unique perspective of Officers working at Western Australia’s only Indigenous run Police Station,” said Nashen. “It is a particularly significant film as it explores whether Indigenous officers are the key to dismantling prejudiced Police culture from within – a topic that is both very relevant and underexplored.

“In light of the Black Lives Matter movement, the film’s overarching themes are particularly pertinent in today’s socio-political climate.”

Having gone wholly online for the first time ever, amidst numerous Festivals doing so, SFF achieving such to date represents within Australia a unique undertaking given the scale of the project, breadth of the audience and extent and nature of premiere features on offer.

“We are exceptionally grateful for the continued support of filmmakers, Government funders, partners, donors and our audience for helping make the virtual Festival such a success,” continued Nashen.

“We do not currently have plans for an online component in future years. The Festival very much looks forward to seeing our audience in cinemas next year for a fully immersive and connected Sydney Film Festival.”

on Film Fight Club

on Festevez

[tipsycad147]

Five hard truths about magick

Posted by Michelle Gruben on Mar 29, 2019

Of the many laws of magick, there are a few that you’ll never see on a T-shirt or affirmation board. Here, we’ll cover some of the tough stuff: The harsh, the unsettling, the ambiguous facts of living an enchanted life.

This article was inspired by some recent discussions of false positivity—that is, the habitual repetition of encouraging words and images. In short, false positivity means well, but it does harm by shutting down discussion of anything problematic. You can’t hide the truth forever—and when you try, it seeps out in sneaky and unexpected ways.

There are certain aspects of magick that are difficult to come to terms with. The purpose of airing them is not to discourage anyone from their path, but to counter some of the shallow advice and empty promises that the witchy blogosphere churns out.

It’s time for some straight talk about magick—some Swords to go with your Cups, some Rue with your Roses.

1. It's not for everybody.

Can anyone become a Witch? Any honest answer to this question is complicated. In some ways, yes—the magickal arts are open to all who seek them. In other ways, no. Some people lack the gifts, the learning—but most often, the dedication—to become effective practitioners of the Craft.

These two are the fundamental magickal skills: The ability to alter reality through will. And, the ability to perceive things beyond the normal senses. These experiences are part of our natural state of being. They are, in a sense, the birthright of every conscious creature.

Yet these abilities are constrained on our earthly plane and must be located and cultivated. You need a strong will to accomplish this. It takes repetition. It takes humility. It often requires help from others—partners, spirits, plants, disparate parts of self—whose cooperation you must earn.

In short, excelling in magick is just like excelling in business or music or athletics. Not every aspirant will have what it takes. Talent only gets you so far. Hard work isn’t always enough. Sometimes you do everything right and still don’t get the results you want.

It’s not easy. It’s not for everyone (or at least, not all of the time).

2. Real witchcraft isn't photogenic.

Thick black eyeliner, a bespoke cloak, moon tattoos, and a table full of Amethysts—that’s what magick is made of, right? Sure, if you believe the internet. Like so many other things, witchcraft has been co-opted in recent years by lifestyle bloggers and taste makers, advertisers and influences. Super-stylish, just-edgy-enough witchy pics go hand-in-hand with the idea that magick is a piece of cake.

What’s wrong with enjoying all these highly preformative images of witchcraft? Nothing! There’s no reason a person can’t be genuinely magickal and also extremely good at self-presentation. Visual art is a kind of magick, too. However, let’s not make the mistake of confusing Instagram witches with the real thing.

It’s even possible for personal magick and social media to work at cross-purposes. Oversharing violates the principle of magickal silence—the idea that talking about your workings can dilute or disperse their energy. People who endlessly photograph their working tools, altars, and ritual garments are arguably siphoning off some of their power for the sake of likes and followers.

Thinking back about the most powerful magick I’ve witnessed, much of it has been in the dark, among old or shabbily dressed people, with nary a smartphone in sight. The most eye-opening books I own are crappy dog-eared paperbacks that would look terrible in a tableau with a crystal pendant and a sprig of Rosemary. Pinterest offers no altar porn for the third eye…you’ll have to find those goodies on your own.

3. Magick is dangerous.

The Satanic Panic of the 1990s was in full swing when I first embarked on my magickal studies. The media often reported on the addiction, insanity, and death that were the obvious consequences of dabbling in the occult. Religious tracts and books warned against the dangers of “gateway” activities like drum circles and Harry Potter books. I used to hoard these writings and snicker at them. What a quaint idea—that devils stalk the earth, seeking the ruin of souls through Ouija boards and zodiac pendants!

With more experience, I see a grain of truth in those zealous warnings. It’s not all rainbows and butterflies out there, folks. Different magicians have different opinions about whether spirit entities have an external reality or only dwell within the mind of the magick worker. I can’t prove it either way, of course. But my own instinct says that entities are real, they have independent consciousness, and not all of them have your best interests in mind.

Not scared of spirits? Fine—let’s go to the energy model of magick. Playing with spiritual technologies—meditation, invocation, astral travel—can cause extreme and rapid shifts in your energy body. They can wreck your appetite and mess with your sex life. They can effect changes in your mood and sleep cycle that will disrupt every aspect of your daily existence.

Other hazards of the occult are more pedestrian: You can become arrogant (common!). You can turn into a colossal bore who only talks to plants (and even the plants wish you would shut up). You can invite the scorn of people who don’t approve of your path, people who formerly respected you. It’s hard to keep your spiritual and mundane lives in balance—but it’s absolutely necessary if you want to make magick a lifelong quest.

Anything worthwhile carries some risk. With magick, we are talking about nothing less than the rapid evolution of the soul…so it only makes sense than the risks would be commensurate with the reward. Only you can weigh the dangers and decide if it’s worth doing. (See #1: It’s not for everybody.)

4. You (probably) need tools for effective spellwork.

“Cast spells without tools!”

“The secret of mental magick!”

“Advanced witchcraft!”

There’s a whole slew of authors and teachers offering instruction in tool-less spellcraft. And yeah, technically they’re correct: The only tool you really need is your focused, unadulterated Will.

But therein lies the problem. How many of us actually possess a focused, unadulterated Will? We’re human! Our thoughts are always mixed with distractions, mental noise, memories, and misgivings. Magick without tools is theoretically do-able…but in practice, it’s rarely as effective.

It’s true that intention is the most important component in spellwork. It’s true, also, that the more practised you become with certain skills (visualisation and trance induction), the less you tend to rely on the externals. However…

Magickal tools—and I’m not just saying this as a shop owner—tools play a very important role. Several roles, actually. That’s why Witches—yes, even “advanced” ones, have employed them for centuries.

What do tools accomplish that thoughts alone do not? Here’s a sampling:

1. Anchoring: Tools link your intention in the physical plane (which is where you want the results to manifest, right?) Most magick spells can be conceived as a kind of cycle—from earthly need to thought/will and back to physical action. Tools complete the loop by grounding your petition in the present time and place.

2. Distraction: Tools subvert the less-magickal parts of the brain (mental chatter, worries, skepticism) by engaging the older, more primal parts. Tying knots, lighting incense, and dressing candles are all classic ways to activate spells. You could say these actions let your magickal self do its work by keeping the mind and body busy.

3. Correspondence: Spell ingredients like herbs and candles contribute allied energies to your spell. The magickal brain is both literal and sensual. To a person who is very familiar with lemons, the thought of a lemon is enough to invoke Solar energy. But if you have an actual lemon—bright and yellow and soaked in the summer sun—that’s better, you know? I refer to Randall Garrett’s maxim: “The best symbol for a sharp knife is a sharp knife.”

4. Effort: The extra work of using tools is a gatekeeper that separates the worthy spells from the unworthy ones. When you go through the trouble to acquire and prepare materials, you’re signalling to your unconscious that this spell actually matters—and that will generally translate to better results.

Magickal tools don’t have to be complicated, and they don’t have to be expensive. (See our list of cheap and free witchcraft tools.) A candle and some oil. A pen and a piece of paper. Keep it focused: An over-encumbered spell is just as a bad as a flimsy one.

Unless you are a super-adept—like, the kind of master that comes along once in a zillion years—you probably can’t just speak or dream your desires into being. Spells without tools are more akin to…wishes. It’s fun to make a wish, but they usually don’t come true on their own.

5. There are no experts.

“We’re all apprentices in a craft where no one becomes a master.” Ernest Hemingway was referring to writing, but the same can certainly be said of the metaphysical arts.

Magick is a vast and mysterious topic. There’s a natural instinct to look up to people who have been at it longer than you, or who seem to be more sure of themselves. But while some people are objectively more accomplished, there’s nobody who’s got it all figured out. We are all grappling with the inexplicable mystery of consciousness. We are all grasping at forms we can’t possibly see the shape of.

It’s scary to realise that everybody else is basically flying blind. But it’s liberating, too. When you stop relying on others to show you the way, you can begin to truly explore your own power.

And there you have it...five tough nuggets. I don't expect that this will become one of my most popular blog posts ever, but I'm happy that I published it. What are your hard-won magickal truths? Share with other readers in the comments!

https://www.groveandgrotto.com/blogs/articles/five-hard-truths-about-magick

[conversci]

People Conducting Research - Jake Valentine

Meet Jake Valentine – PhD student and researcher at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the collaborative NHMRC-funded National Centre for Infections in Cancer (NCIC). Though relatively new to the research scene, Jake is already looking to be an absolute powerhouse in the biosurveillance field. His research aims to improve the ways we monitor and detect infections in cancer patients and to evaluate the sustainability of federal funding schemes in healthcare using ‘big data’.

Jake has always been interested in science, studying biology and chemistry at high school and beginning a Biomedical Science degree at Monash University soon after. Initially intending on pursuing medicine, Jake realised that research underlies much of the ‘behind the scenes’ in the clinic, and instead majored in Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Jake got his first taste of wet lab research during his third year as part of a research project working on the bacterium Clostridium difficile, which ‘hijacks’ the human immune system upon infection.

Though passionate about microbiology, Jake decided wet lab work wasn’t his calling. The frustrations of day-to-day negative lab results (including a few too many ‘disappointing’ Western Blots!) caused him to reassess his research interests. Keeping his passion for infectious diseases central, Jake seamlessly transitioned to the dry lab for his Honours year, working at the Monash Central Clinical School within the Alfred Hospital, where he was the recipient of the Bachelor of Biomedical Science Honours Prize. His project involved working with big data to characterise epidemiology of infections in cancer patients - specifically, invasive fungal diseases in patients with hematological malignancies, or cancers of the blood1.

Because of the immunosuppressive implications of cancer treatment and care, cancer patients are more susceptible to infections than the general population - whether bacterial, viral, parasitic or fungal. Jake’s research involved migrating disparate health data from clinical and administrative datasets and using these ‘big data’ to look at the rates of fungal infections in cancer patients, and how and why they occur. Analysis of these data then informs how invasive fungal infections may best be addressed in the clinical setting. Jake also investigated the cost burden of these infections using data from the Victorian Government’s Department of Health and Human Services. These datasets can then be linked, providing insights into the bigger picture of invasive fungal infections in blood cancer patients across Victoria. We can then determine the most efficient use of cost and hospital resources to achieve better health for patients through prevention and earlier detection of these infections.

Using epidemiology and biostatistics in a clinical setting Jake says ‘wet [his] appetite’ for something more. In early 2018 he commenced PhD studies at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne working on a similar project2 within the National Centre for Infections in Cancer (NCIC). The government (NHMRC)-funded NCIC is a collaborative effort across the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) and partners to “address a critical need for informed strategies to reduce infections in cancer”. They aim to use surveillance, implementation and innovation to improve patient prognoses and better manage infections in people with cancer. Jake’s role within this team is primarily within the surveillance arm. He broadly aims to improve surveillance of infections in patients with cancer using big data, and to ensure federal funding models are equitable and sustainable for hospitals managing these healthcare-associated infections in cancer patients. Using patient data from the Peter Mac and beyond, he aims to create new technological solutions to audit and assess these data to have the greatest impact on patient outcomes. The biggest killer of cancer patients, aside from the cancer itself, is infection – and using data systems that Jake is developing, we can work towards detecting these infections earlier, or preventing them from occurring altogether, all whilst ensuring hospitals are appropriately funded to do so.

 Image 1:  Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of haematology-oncology patients diagnosed with and without an infection

It can often be difficult to imagine what a scientist does when they aren’t in a lab coat all day - but Jake assures that being a dry lab scientist is almost more difficult as you can work ‘whenever and wherever’ you like! A typical day for Jake involves lots of emails, reading (or writing!) literature, and all the statistical work that is required to look at patient data. The datasets that Jake uses in his work are complex and diverse, and ‘cleaning the datasets’ (i.e. preparing them for analysis) often takes up more of Jake’s day than the research itself!

Image 2:  Heat map of infection incidence (per 10,000 occupied bed-days) stratified by cancer type

Working with hospital and patient data can also be difficult at times, and frustrations can arise from ‘red-tape’ when getting access to databases. To access data, researchers must go through lengthy processes of obtaining ethics approvals, which are time consuming and involve lots of paperwork. However, for Jake, this is a great reminder that the patient data he is analysing comes from ‘a real person’ - and is not just a number. The ‘beauty of working with big data’ for Jake is that he can ‘see improvement in patient outcomes’, and that the work he is doing is making a real difference. Connecting the research to the patient is absolutely crucial, and Jake urges all researchers to take a step back and ‘understand the significance of your findings in a clinical setting’.

Very much still at the beginning of his research career, Jake doesn’t see himself moving down the academic path, favouring working in a government or corporate health setting to make high-level changes to health systems. Establishing both national and international collaborations during his PhD is a priority, to ensure his research is translated appropriately to key stakeholders. Jake is also a big believer in public engagement and networking, agreeing that we should be training our students to communicate their science from the start. This extends to the wider community, and that getting patients ‘on board’ with research is ‘fundamental’ to a positive public perception of science. Fluent in German, Jake is also a huge believer in using the ‘other side of [our] brains’ to ‘bridge the gap’ between science and language (or something else!) to improve the way we approach our research.

We at the Convergence Science Network will be following Jake’s journey as he completes his PhD studies, and are excited to see how his project influences infection rates in cancer patients at the Peter Mac and beyond. You can follow Jake on Twitter @jakevalentine95, and follow @NCICancer for updates on the NCIC’s mission for greater strategies to reduce infections in cancer.

Bethany Davey | Science Communication Officer | Convergence Science Network

References:

1. Valentine, J. et al. A population-based analysis of invasive fungal disease in haematology-oncology patients using data linkage of state-wide registries and administrative databases: 2005 – 2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3901-y.

2. Valentine, J. et al. Sepsis incidence and mortality are underestimated in Australian intensive care unit administrative data. Med J Aust. 2019 Mar; 210(4):188-188.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50017

This is Jake’s most recent article discussing hospital funding models for Australian hospitals: Valentine J. Demystifying casemix funding and hospital-acquired complication penalties: the coding continuum. https://cancerandinfections.org/ncic-blog. National Centre for Infections in Cancer. 2019

[douchebagbrainwaves]

THE OTHER 95% OF LISP DIFFERENT

In other fields, companies regularly sue competitors for patent infringement till you have money, people will sue you for patent infringement is like a sort of flow. It seemed odd that the outliers at the two ends of the spectrum from a coding job at a company, but this apparently verdant territory is one from which few startups emerge alive. But again, the problem that has afflicted so many previous communities: being ruined by growth. Even with us working to make things happen for them on purpose rather than by accident, the frequency of helpful chance meetings in the Valley aren't automatically impressed with you just because you're starting a company. The only thing technology can't cheapen is brand. Market mechanisms no longer protect you, because the only potential acquirer is Microsoft, and when there's only one acquirer, they don't seem as impressive as complex ones. In some fields it might be as much as half. The best way to generate startup ideas is also the most unlikely-sounding: by accident. In an essay I wrote for high school students think they need a little more information, and that will convince any investor. You have certain mental gestures you've learned in your work, and when you're not paying attention, you keep making these same gestures, but somewhat randomly.

Understanding all the implications—even the inconvenient implications—of what someone tells you is a subset of a more general technique: making things easier, but now a third type has appeared halfway between them: the most successful startups seem to be the case in most types of business; they are rarely killed by competitors. One thing I do feel pretty certain of is that if you cut investors' appetite for risk. That's the whole point of technology. A round they often don't. I'd been granted four patents. He found they were one of the problems I hope to focus on, it will only evolve at big company rates instead of startup rates, whereas alternatives will evolve with especial speed. For example, they'll almost always start with a lowball offer, just to see if you'll take it. But the founders contribute ideas. For example, in 2004 Bill Clinton found he was feeling short of breath. Most startups that succeed do it by getting bought, should you make that a conscious goal?

Startups live or die on morale. But it was not till the Industrial Revolution that wealth creation definitively replaced corruption as the best way to come up with your real idea. They don't sue till a startup has 3 founders than 2, and better when the leader of the company. Ambitious people already move halfway around the world to further their careers, and startups should simply ignore other companies' patents. Why do they do it and you don't. In the software business happens in startups, and it will be a great thing—so great that people in 100 years will still be living in the same problem, they start to lose interest. I found spam intolerable, and I predict that will be true of startups in general.

Their tactics in pushing you down that slope are usually fairly brutal. If you make people with money love you, you didn't call the police. In a startup you have lots of worries, but you can't create instant customers. Let's rehearse the chain of argument so far. Often to make something people want. It's part of the compensation is in the form of powerful, inexpensive computers, and programmers immediately set to work using it to create more. If you're benevolent, people will sue you whether they have grounds to or not. The reason they like it when you're ramen profitable. You get the opposite of the damping that the fear/greed balance usually produces in markets.

Making a new search engine means competing with Google, and recently I've noticed some cracks in their fortress. If you're going to optimize a number, the one-click patent, for example have been granted large numbers of people will change the way they make a living, it would arguably be immoral not to. It takes experience to predict what other people will want. Maybe it would be for the company to build their own: if you already have if you can't raise the full amount. There's a real difference, because an assertion provokes objections in a way that leads to more ideas. Whereas if the speaker were still operating on the Daddy Model, and saw wealth as something that flowed from a common source and had to be embodied as companies to work. We inserted him as a ringer in case some competitor tried to spam our web designers. The numbers on the Y axis will take care of. If a post has a linkbait title, editors sometimes rephrase it to be more jobs for Americans, because the good suppliers are no longer worth taking if the maximum return is decreased. Curiously enough, it's the same reason Facebook has so far remained independent: money guys undervalue the most innovative startups. Or the would-have method with startup founders, I did it to get rich.

The principle applies for adults too, though perhaps it has to be open and good is what Macs are again, finally. They were even more contemptuous when they discovered that Viaweb didn't process credit card transactions we didn't for the whole first year. It seems obvious. Oops. But Apple created wealth, in the same position I'd give the same advice again. This is especially necessary with links whose titles are rallying cries, because otherwise they become implicit vote up if you believe such-and-forget in the sense of being very short, and also on topic. All the super-angels don't like.

And that seems bad for everyone. In thirty years, the patent office may understand the sort of thing you'd expect Google to do. Some of the attention people currently devote to watching movies and TV can be stolen by things that are superficially impressive. How lucky that someone so powerful is so benevolent. It The second reason we tend to find great disparities of wealth alarming is that for most of human history the usual way to accumulate a fortune by creating wealth. This is my attitude to the site generally. A rounds later. We've even had a twin study: West Germany, on; East Germany, off. I'm hopeful things won't always be so awkward. Northern Italy in 1100, on. That combination—making big decisions about things we don't understand, and more often than competitors hurt them, for example.

[anhed-nia]

3/9/17: LADY IN THE WATER...

I’ve been sitting on this review for a long time now, and it’s a little difficult for me to explain why. LADY IN THE WATER is one of the all time worst professionally produced films I’ve ever even heard of, from a director about whom ridicule has become a beloved international pastime. This should see me running-not-walking to fire off my latest round of self-important vitriol at this broad-side-of-a-barn target, and yet, here I am three months later with seemingly nothing to say. The truth is, as far as I’m able to articulate it, that this movie just makes me feel terrible.

To be a little fairer to myself, one of the major problems is that I have a very hard time retaining what even happens in M. Night Shyamalan’s lifeless, unmagical “bedtime story” (as per an especially self-satisfied tagline). In fact, I think I watched it three times and change just to see if there was something stimulating that I had just blinked and missed. I failed to find any such inspiration, but I’ll do my best to map it all out. Paul Giamatti plays the stammering super of a rural Pennsylvanian apartment complex that houses a “colorful cast of characters”, including:

- Out of work film critic Bob Balaban (WHY); - Just some lady Marybeth Hurt (it’s the PARENTS reunion you never wanted!); - A gang of irritating stoners who are so unlikely (Jared Harris?) that I couldn’t help assuming Shyamalan is so uncool that no one would ever consider offering him drugs; - A multigenerational household full of loud tacky Korean women, the direction of whom has a bit of a “one of my best friends is Korean, they’re just like this!” vibe to it; - Freddy Rodriguez with just one gigantically muscular arm for no discernible reason other than pissing me off; - …worst of all, worse than in my wildest dreams, M. Night himself as a frustrated but promising young writer about whom the less said the better, but I’m going to have to get to it eventually whether I like it or not.

There are also a bunch of other people too, but as you’ll see, NONE of these people matter all that much as individuals, contributing substantially to my LADY aphasia. Anyway, what happens is that one strange night, Paul Giamatti extracts from his pool sylphy Bryce Dallas Howard, who magically cures his stammer (that he only had for like 5 minutes before this happens)(and it was mainly in a scene where a big spider is scaring everyone so it didn’t really read as a speech impediment)(but WHATEVER). You find out quickly that Bryce is a water sprite, and she can’t return home because there’s an evil wolf made out of lawn waiting to kill her, but there’s like an ancient prophecy or something that that can save her if Paul can figure out how it applies to his life—specifically, he has to identify among his tenants “a Symbolist, Guardian, Guild, and Healer”. Let me be very clear about how this happens: There is no cursed treasure or forbidden scroll or heavenly vision or anything that imparts this information in a fantastical OR CINEMATIC way. All there is, is Bryce is magically prevented from speaking explicitly about this stuff, so the group devises an annoying yes/no guessing game to get information out of her, even though it turns out she doesn’t know very much about this shit to begin with. Therefore, the various mythical mantles are applied totally arbitrarily and unceremoniously to various randos in the building, and then when the secret ritual doesn’t work THAT way, they reshuffle the deck pretty arbitrarily again, and THEN the mystical giant eagle comes and makes a lot of embarrassing cat noises and helps Bryce go home. Also there’s something I never managed to focus on about how the mythical world of magical creatures is normally held in check by monkeys who were born so evil that they killed their own parents right out the womb. It’s not clear to me why such anarchically evil monsters would be interested in enforcing laws or preserving taboos, we’re just supposed to accept that they do, and like, for now something is wrong about them so the grass wolf is on the loose and everything. It’s so fucking stupid.

I hope that at this point, it’s pretty clear why this dreary vaguery of a film failed to capture my imagination. It still should have invited my sadism a little more readily. A bunch of pretty disgusting shit happens in between the meaningless plot points described above. The film insists on trying to kindle an icky paternalistic romance between Paul Giamatti and the often-nude nymphette that he frequently finds in his arms, awake or asleep. Of course, he needs a little depth to make this “work”, so Bryce Dallas Howard rudely reads his secret diary to him out loud, as if he doesn’t know what’s in it, to reveal to us that he used to be a brilliant doctor until his family was killed and then he got sad. The Korean caricatures are the ones who impart to us the nature of Bryce Dallas Howard’s character, through the pointlessly drawn out recitation of a completely nonsensical folk tale with all kinds of reeeeally toooootally Korean-sounding words in it like “narf” and “scrunt”. Meanwhile, Bob Balaban only exists for the director to take out his pent up rage against the army of film critics who have been nobly shitting all over his movies for the duration of his career, in an assortment of spirit-crushing comic relief scenes leading up to a dull and predictable death. As if this weren’t enough moral signaling, Shyamalan inserts himself into this tale in a fashion that will astonish even the most hardbitten cynic. I guess it’s time to talk about it.

I wish I had a way of recording here how long I sat at the keyboard trying to formulate this. The director has cast himself as a brilliant young man who, in the face of criticism and rejection and ignorance, is collecting in a tome called “The Cookbook” (?) his revolutionary ideas about changing the world. And, as Bryce Dallas Howard informs him, he WILL change the world. He is the central character in his own prophecy, in which he delivers unto humanity his life-altering wisdom, which are so profoundly rattling that he will be martyred for them. When I first saw this movie, and it first became clear what is happening with this character, my heart sank. Instead of the usual convulsion of derisive laughter, or the salient whetting of my predatory appetite, I just felt awful. Where before, I had joined the rest of the world in regarding Shyamalan as a modern, much less likable but no less hilarious Ed Wood, I suddenly felt that I was witnessing some real deal Emperor’s New Clothes shit. Narcissism and persecution complexes aren’t exactly a new invention, but usually, people live enough life to know that they shouldn’t go around saying EXACTLY what they think of themselves; on the rare occasion that someone does, their very behavior usually ensures that they don’t gain an audience wide enough for it to cause a real personal catastrophe. This was really grim. I couldn’t believe that this man was calling himself Jesus Christ with a typewriter, out loud, in front of me. Isn’t there anyone who cares about what happens to him, who would protect him from himself? Isn’t there anybody in his life who loves him enough to have been guiding him, all along really, not to build himself such a ferocious trap and walk right into it deliberately? What the fuck happened here? How is this real?

Basically, the whole movie is a real “who hurt you” moment, with chest-pounding declarations of relevance existing alongside a bizarre and persistent disconnect with reality. The story is bad, the effects are bad, the characters are ugly and insulting, and the world in which it takes place—the “real” human world, not even the “Blue World” of the narf and the scrunt—just doesn’t seem to make any sense. The setting itself, which looks much more like a Southern Californian or even Southeast Asian environment than the gritty Northeastern American location that it really actually is, doesn’t seem to gel. It’s hard to understand how any of these disparate people, who you see in a single eyeful during a huge party that’s the centerpiece of the film, have come to roost here. We not only mix feckless burnouts with (THREE) professional authors, but somehow there is also an entire spandex-clad glam band with amp stacks and everything that they keep god knows where. The aforementioned party brings a curious thing to light, too, that’s just a drop in the bucket of this awfulness, and yet it is emblematic of the film’s basic nature. The band is featured playing exactly one bar of a rockin’ version of “Maggie’s Farm”. At first I thought, “Well, that’s probably affordable”, but then I began to realize that Bob Dylan covers seem to flow insistently throughout the whole movie. The ending credits threaten to never end, as an infuriatingly slow version of “Times They Are A-Changin’” smolders but refuses to be extinguished, with such languor that it’s hard not to shout through the screen at the singer to SPIT IT THE FUCK OUT ALREADY, THEY ARE “A-CHANGING”, WE KNOW WHAT YOU’RE GOING TO SAY. There may be some connection to make between the film’s obsession with prophecies, and Dylan’s identity as something of a modern prophet himself, but the whole thing just gives one the sense of a mid-mid-life crisis dad who has suddenly rediscovered the Beatles, whose regular guests start to dread every visit’s inevitable, multiple, embarrassingly serious playthroughs of Sergeant Pepper’s . If you know what I’m saying. I’m not sure what I’m saying. All I can say really conclusively is that none of this makes any sense to me, and I’m a little surprised that this shockingly narcissistic movie isn’t more notorious, and I’m a lot surprised that this shockingly narcissistic director was allowed to make another movie after this. Which I suppose I’ll have to deal with as soon as it comes out in a more hatewatchable format than the theaters to which it was confoundingly distributed. See you then, if I ever manage to live through this.

Hey here’s a picture of an Olympic figure skater at the premier, that’s weird.