#defer

[thejsacco]

Deferring Happiness

I’ve recently written about various ways to foster more happiness in your life including yoga, meditation, expressing gratitude, and caring for your physical health. All of these things are wonderful ways to be happier, but still we are not as happy as we could be. Most of us are trapped in thinking that happiness is something we defer until we retire, buy that new house, find a better job,…

[kumpulanjurnalmakalah-blog]

[solved] How do I defer or async this WordPress javascript snippet to load lastly for faster page load times?

[solved] How do I defer or async this WordPress javascript snippet to load lastly for faster page load times?

In order to defer or async a JavaScript snippet in WordPress to load lastly for faster page load times, there are a few steps you can take. This will help to prioritize the loading of essential content on your website first, and then load the JavaScript snippet afterwards. Here’s how you can do it: Identify the JavaScript snippet: The first step in deferring or asyncing a JavaScript snippet is to…

[worldgoit]

WordPress: Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources for a Faster Website

In today's fast-paced digital world, a slow website can be a major turn-off for visitors. It's not just user experience that's at stake – search engines like Google also consider website speed as a ranking factor. One common issue that can slow down your WordPress website is render-blocking resources. In this article, we'll delve into what render-blocking resources are, why they matter, and most importantly, how to eliminate them to ensure your WordPress website performs at its best.

Originhttps://worldgoit.com/archives/posts/software-development/wordpress-eliminate-render-blocking-resources-for-a-faster-website/

Table of Contents

- Introduction - Understanding Render-Blocking Resources - Impact on Website Performance - Identifying Render-Blocking Resources - Best Practices for Elimination - 1. Asynchronous Loading - 2. Deferred JavaScript - 3. Browser Caching - 4. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) - 5. Minification and Compression - 6. Prioritize Above-the-Fold Content - 7. Modern Web Development Tools - Implementing Solutions Step-by-Step - Conclusion - FAQs

Introduction

When a user visits your WordPress website, their browser needs to load various resources like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Render-blocking resources are JavaScript and CSS files that prevent the page from loading until they are fully processed. This can significantly slow down the rendering of your web page, leading to a poor user experience.

Understanding Render-Blocking Resources

Render-blocking resources act as roadblocks for your website's rendering process. Browsers pause rendering to fetch and process these resources, delaying the display of the page content. JavaScript files, especially those placed in the header, are major culprits. CSS files can also impact rendering if not handled properly.

Impact on Website Performance

Website speed matters more than ever in a world where attention spans are shrinking. Studies show that visitors tend to abandon sites that take more than a couple of seconds to load. Additionally, search engines consider page speed as a ranking factor, meaning slower websites might rank lower in search results.

Identifying Render-Blocking Resources

To tackle this issue, you must first identify which resources are causing the delay. There are various online tools and plugins available that can analyze your website and provide a list of render-blocking resources. This step is crucial in understanding what needs to be optimized.

Best Practices for Elimination

1. Asynchronous Loading By loading resources asynchronously, you allow the browser to continue rendering the page while fetching the resources in the background. This can greatly improve the perceived loading speed. 2. Deferred JavaScript Deferring JavaScript means postponing its execution until after the initial rendering. This prevents JavaScript from blocking other resources and speeds up the page load. Recommendation Plugin and Youtube Async JavaScript Autoptimize https://youtu.be/ElpcjGBgTGk?si=ue1rvzQPs0YI971R 3. Browser Caching Leverage browser caching to store static resources locally. Returning visitors will then have these resources cached, resulting in faster load times. 4. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) CDNs distribute your website's resources across multiple servers worldwide. This reduces the physical distance between the user and the server, leading to quicker resource retrieval. 5. Minification and Compression Minify your CSS and JavaScript files by removing unnecessary characters. Additionally, compressing these files reduces their size, making them quicker to load. 6. Prioritize Above-the-Fold Content Load essential resources first, especially those needed for above-the-fold content. This way, users can see and interact with the main content sooner. 7. Modern Web Development Tools Consider using modern build tools like Webpack or Rollup. These tools can bundle and optimize your resources, reducing the number of requests made by the browser

Implementing Solutions Step-by-Step

- Start by analyzing your website's current performance using online tools. - Identify the specific resources causing the delay. - Update your WordPress theme and plugins to their latest versions. - Utilize asynchronous loading for non-essential resources. - Defer JavaScript where possible and optimize CSS delivery. - Leverage browser caching and consider a reliable CDN. - Minify and compress CSS and JavaScript files. - Prioritize above-the-fold content for faster initial rendering. - Explore modern web development tools for advanced optimization.

Conclusion

A fast-loading website is a key factor in retaining visitors and achieving higher search engine rankings. By understanding and addressing render-blocking resources, you can significantly improve your WordPress site's performance. Implementing the strategies mentioned in this article will help you create a smoother, more enjoyable user experience while boosting your website's SEO efforts.  

before after  

FAQs

Q1: What are render-blocking resources? Render-blocking resources are JavaScript and CSS files that prevent a webpage from rendering until they are fully loaded and processed. Q2: How do render-blocking resources affect my website? Render-blocking resources can slow down your website's loading speed, leading to a poor user experience and potentially lower search engine rankings. Q3: How can I identify render-blocking resources on my WordPress site? There are various online tools and plugins available that can analyze your website and provide a list of render-blocking resources. Q4: What is asynchronous loading? Asynchronous loading allows the browser to continue rendering a webpage while fetching resources in the background, improving perceived loading speed. Q5: Can using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) help with render-blocking resources? Yes, a CDN can distribute your website's resources across multiple servers, reducing the distance between the user and the server and speeding up resource retrieval. Read the full article

[fulltacs]

PriceGaz x Reader something something Gaz tells you to thank daddy for being so nice to you but when you turn to Price the younger man scruffs your neck—“wasn’t talking about him, baby”

[whatareyoureallyafraidof]

[b0tster]

If someone gave you a Tesla Cybertruck for free, how would you destroy it?

exoding hammer

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Marshmallow Longtermism

The paperback edition of The Lost Cause, my nationally bestselling, hopeful solarpunk novel is out this week!

My latest column for Locus Magazine is "Marshmallow Longtermism"; it's a reflection on how conservatives self-mythologize as the standards-bearers for deferred gratification and making hard trade-offs, but are utterly lacking in these traits when it comes to climate change and inequality:

https://locusmag.com/2024/09/cory-doctorow-marshmallow-longtermism/

Conservatives often root our societal ills in a childish impatience, and cast themselves as wise adults who understand that "you can't get something for nothing." Think here of the memes about lazy kids who would rather spend on avocado toast and fancy third-wave coffee rather than paying off their student loans. In this framing, poverty is a consequence of immaturity. To be a functional adult is to be sober in all things: not only does a grownup limit their intoxicant intake to head off hangovers, they also go to the gym to prevent future health problems, they save their discretionary income to cover a down-payment and student loans.

This isn't asceticism, though: it's a mature decision to delay gratification. Avocado toast is a reward for a life well-lived: once you've paid off your mortgage and put your kid through college, then you can have that oat-milk latte. This is just "sound reasoning": every day you fail to pay off your student loan represents another day of compounding interest. Pay off the loan first, and you'll save many avo toasts' worth of interest and your net toast consumption can go way, way up.

Cleaving the world into the patient (the mature, the adult, the wise) and the impatient (the childish, the foolish, the feckless) does important political work. It transforms every societal ill into a personal failing: the prisoner in the dock who stole to survive can be recast as a deficient whose partying on study-nights led to their failure to achieve the grades needed for a merit scholarship, a first-class degree, and a high-paying job.

Dividing the human race into "the wise" and "the foolish" forms an ethical basis for hierarchy. If some of us are born (or raised) for wisdom, then naturally those people should be in charge. Moreover, putting the innately foolish in charge is a recipe for disaster. The political scientist Corey Robin identifies this as the unifying belief common to every kind of conservativism: that some are born to rule, others are born to be ruled over:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/08/01/set-healthy-boundaries/#healthy-populism

This is why conservatives are so affronted by affirmative action, whose premise is that the absence of minorities in the halls of power stems from systemic bias. For conservatives, the fact that people like themselves are running things is evidence of their own virtue and suitability for rule. In conservative canon, the act of shunting aside members of dominant groups to make space for members of disfavored minorities isn't justice, it's dangerous "virtue signaling" that puts the childish and unfit in positions of authority.

Again, this does important political work. If you are ideologically committed to deregulation, and then a giant, deregulated sea-freighter crashes into a bridge, you can avoid any discussion of re-regulating the industry by insisting that we are living in a corrupted age where the unfit are unjustly elevated to positions of authority. That bridge wasn't killed by deregulation – it's demise is the fault of the DEI hire who captained the ship:

https://www.axios.com/local/salt-lake-city/2024/03/26/baltimore-bridge-dei-utah-lawmaker-phil-lyman-misinformation

The idea of a society made up of the patient and wise and the impatient and foolish is as old as Aesop's "The Ant and the Grasshopper," but it acquired a sheen of scientific legitimacy in 1970, with Walter Mischel's legendary "Stanford Marshmallow Experiment":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experiment

In this experiment, kids were left alone in a locked room with a single marshmallow, after being told that they would get two marshmallows in 15 minutes, but only if they waited until them to eat the marshmallow before them. Mischel followed these kids for decades, finding that the kids who delayed gratification and got that second marshmallow did better on every axis – educational attainment, employment, and income. Adult brain-scans of these subjects revealed structural differences between the patient and the impatient.

For many years, the Stanford Marshmallow experiment has been used to validate the cleavage of humanity in the patient and wise and impatient and foolish. Those brain scans were said to reveal the biological basis for thinking of humanity's innate rulers as a superior subspecies, hidden in plain sight, destined to rule.

Then came the "replication crisis," in which numerous bedrock psychological studies from the mid 20th century were re-run by scientists whose fresh vigor disproved and/or complicated the career-defining findings of the giants of behavioral "science." When researchers re-ran Mischel's tests, they discovered an important gloss to his findings. By questioning the kids who ate the marshmallows right away, rather than waiting to get two marshmallows, they discovered that these kids weren't impatient, they were rational.

The kids who ate the marshmallows were more likely to come from poorer households. These kids had repeatedly been disappointed by the adults in their lives, who routinely broke their promises to the kids. Sometimes, this was well-intentioned, as when an economically precarious parent promised a treat, only to come up short because of an unexpected bill. Sometimes, this was just callousness, as when teachers, social workers or other authority figures fobbed these kids off with promises they knew they couldn't keep.

The marshmallow-eating kids had rationally analyzed their previous experiences and were making a sound bet that a marshmallow on the plate now was worth more than a strange adult's promise of two marshmallows. The "patient" kids who waited for the second marshmallow weren't so much patient as they were trusting: they had grown up with parents who had the kind of financial cushion that let them follow through on their promises, and who had the kind of social power that convinced other adults – teachers, etc – to follow through on their promises to their kids.

Once you understand this, the lesson of the Marshmallow Experiment is inverted. The reason two marshmallow kids thrived is that they came from privileged backgrounds: their high grades were down to private tutors, not the choice to study rather than partying. Their plum jobs and high salaries came from university and family connections, not merit. Their brain differences were the result of a life free from the chronic, extreme stress that comes with poverty.

Post-replication crisis, the moral of the Stanford Marshmallow Experiment is that everyone experiences a mix of patience and impatience, but for the people born to privilege, the consequences of impatience are blunted and the rewards of patience are maximized.

Which explains a lot about how rich people actually behave. Take Charles Koch, who grew his father's coal empire a thousandfold by making long-term investments in automation. Koch is a vocal proponent of patience and long-term thinking, and is openly contemptuous of publicly traded companies because of the pressure from shareholders to give preference to short-term extraction over long-term planning. He's got a point.

Koch isn't just a fossil fuel baron, he's also a wildly successful ideologue. Koch is one of a handful of oligarchs who have transformed American politics by patiently investing in a kraken's worth of think tanks, universities, PACs, astroturf organizations, Star chambers and other world-girding tentacles. After decades of gerrymandering, voter suppression, court-packing and propagandizing, the American billionaire class has seized control of the US and its institutions. Patience pays!

But Koch's longtermism is highly selective. Arguably, Charles Koch bears more personal responsibility for delaying action on the climate emergency than any other person, alive or dead. Addressing greenhouse gasses is the most grasshopper-and-the-ant-ass crisis of all. Every day we delayed doing something about this foreseeable, well-understood climate debt added sky-high compounding interest. In failing to act, we saved billions – but we stuck our future selves with trillions in debt for which no bankruptcy procedure exists.

By convincing us not to invest in retooling for renewables in order to make his billions, Koch was committing the sin of premature avocado toast, times a billion. His inability to defer gratification – which he imposed on the rest of us – means that we are likely to lose much of world's coastal cities (including the state of Florida), and will have to find trillions to cope with wildfires, zoonotic plagues, and hundreds of millions of climate refugees.

Koch isn't a serene Buddha whose ability to surf over his impetuous attachments qualifies him to make decisions for the rest of us. Rather, he – like everyone else – is a flawed vessel whose blind spots are just as stubborn as ours. But unlike a person whose lack of foresight leads to drug addiction and petty crimes to support their habit, Koch's flaws don't just hurt a few people, they hurt our entire species and the only planet that can support it.

The selective marshmallow patience of the rich creates problems beyond climate debt. Koch and his fellow oligarchs are, first and foremost, supporters of oligarchy, an intrinsically destabilizing political arrangement that actually threatens their fortunes. Policies that favor the wealthy are always seeking an equilibrium between instability and inequality: a rich person can either submit to having their money taxed away to build hospitals, roads and schools, or they can invest in building high walls and paying guards to keep the rest of us from building guillotines on their lawns.

Rich people gobble that marshmallow like there's no tomorrow (literally). They always overestimate how much bang they'll get for their guard-labor buck, and underestimate how determined the poors will get after watching their children die of starvation and preventable diseases.

All of us benefit from some kind of cushion from our bad judgment, but not too much. The problem isn't that wealthy people get to make a few poor choices without suffering brutal consequences – it's that they hoard this benefit. Most of us are one missed student debt payment away from penalties and interest that add twenty years to our loan, while Charles Koch can set the planet on fire and continue to act as though he was born with the special judgment that means he knows what's best for us.

On SEPTEMBER 24th, I'll be speaking IN PERSON at the BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY!!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/09/04/deferred-gratification/#selective-foresight

Image: Mark S (modified) https://www.flickr.com/photos/markoz46/4864682934/

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

[foldingfittedsheets]

My mundane super power is that I love blue heelers so much that every time I see them I ask to pet them and their owners always warn me they’re not overly friendly which I know because my boy Sly was also very aloof but every time the dog feels my infinite love and always greets me warmly.

[bemusedlybespectacled]

I don't understand the chevron law thing, could you explain it like I'm five? Should we be working towards fixing whatever the courts just fucked up?

So, okay, I am condensing like a semester of a class I took in 2017 into a very short explanation, but:

It would be really annoying for Congress to individually pass laws approving every new medicine or listing out every single poison you can't have in tap water, so instead there are agencies created by Congress, via a law, to handle a specific thing. The agencies are created by Congress but overseen by the executive branch (so, the president), which is why we say things like "Reagan's EPA" or "Biden's DOJ" - even though Congress creates them, the president determines how they do the thing Congress wants them to do, by passing regulations like "you can't dump cyanide in the local swimming pool" and "no, you can't dump strychnine, either."

However, sometimes people will oppose these regulations by saying that the agency is going beyond the task they were given by Congress. "The Clean Air Act only bans 'pollutants,' and nowhere in the law does it say that 'pollutants' includes arsenic! You're going beyond your mandate!" To which the experts at the EPA would be like, "We, the experts at the EPA, have decided arsenic is a pollutant." On the flip side, the EPA could be like, "We, the experts at the EPA, have decided that arsenic isn't a pollutant," and people would oppose that regulation by being like, "But the Clean Air Act bans 'pollutants,' and it's insane to say that arsenic isn't a pollutant!" So whose interpretation is correct, the government's or the challengers'?

Chevron deference basically put heavy weight onto how the agency (i.e. the government) interpreted the law, with the assumption that the agency was in the right and needing pretty strong evidence that they were interpreting it wrong (like, blatantly doing the opposite of a clear part of the law or something). If there was any ambiguity in how the law was written, you'd defer to the agency's interpretation, even if that interpretation was different depending on who was president at the time.

(Note: there are other ways of challenging regulations other than this one, like saying that they were promulgated in a way that is "arbitrary and capricious" – basically, not backed by any evidence/reasoning other than "we want it." Lots of Trump-era regulations got smacked with this one, though I think they'd be better at it if Trump gets a second term, since they've now had practice.)

Chevron deference wasn't all good – remember that the sword cuts both ways, including when dickholes are in power – but it was a very standard part of the law. Like, any opposition to a regulation would have some citation to be like "Chevron doesn't apply here" and every defense would be like "Chevron absolutely applies here" and most of the time, the agency would win. Like, it was a fundamental aspect of law since the 80s.

The Supreme Court decision basically tosses that out, and says, "In a situation where the law is ambiguous, the court decides what it means." That's not completely insane – interpreting law is a thing judges normally do – but in a situation where the interpretation may hinge on something very complicated outside of the judge's wheelhouse, you now cannot be like, "Your Honor, I promise you that the experts at NOAA know a lot about the weather and made this decision for a good reason."

The main reason it's a problem is that it allows judges to override agencies' judgements about what you should do about a thing and what things you should be working on in the first place. However, I don't think there's really a way of enshrining that into law, outside of maybe adding something to the Administrative Procedure Act, and that would require a Congress that isn't majority Republican.

I will say that kind of I expected this to happen, just because IIRC Gorsuch in particular hates Chevron deference. IMO it's a classic case of "rules for me but not for thee" – Scalia and other conservatives used to rely on Chevron because they wanted their presidents to hold a ton of unchecked power (except for the EPA), but now that we've had Obama and Biden, now conservatives don't like Chevron because it gives the presidents they don't like unchecked power.

[blorbologist]

"Drowning in guilt won't bring you what you want"

"And what is it I want?"

👀

[inter-volve]

[royaltea000]

Been binging the 1986 series again and drew my ver in some of his slays

[doyouknowthisactor]

By "roles" I mean playing a different character, and in a different piece of media; someone playing one character across a franchise only counts as one thing for the purposes of this poll, as does playing multiple characters in one franchise/piece of media

Below are some of this actor's roles. Please only check after voting!

Don films as Mark 'Don' Donald

My Name is Khan as Rizvan Khan

Devdas as Devdas Mukherji

Fan as Gaurav Chandna / Aryan Khana

More roles

[elialys]

ANNA TORV as Olivia Dunham (Fringe) | 2.04 Momentum Deferred

[laurapetrie]

The girls were addicted to perfumes, and when they bathed at night, the water was perfumed and softened with almond bran. They always used Coty. Tatiana favoured Jasmin de Cors; Olga, Rose Thé; Marie constantly changed her perfumes, but was more or less faithful to Lilas, and Anastasia never deviated from Violette.

Lili Dehn, The Real Tsaritsa (1922)

[trailerparkbubbs]

Julian being nervous + Ricky talking them out of situations