#defame
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text

Graham Ingels inspired piece from 2022
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Muslim Brother Faults
Hide the faults of your Muslim brother, do not defame him.
مسلمان بھائی کے عیب چھپائیں بدنام نہ کریں
For more info: https://dawateislami.net/

0 notes
Text
The Spiritual and Moral Consequences of Slander: A Reflection on Hadith from Al-Kafi
بسمہ تعالی – الكافي: محمد بن ي��يى، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن محمد بن سنان، عن مفضل بن عمر قال: قال أبو عبد الله عليه السلام: من روى على مؤمن رواية يريد بها شينه وهدم مروته ليسقط من أعين الناس أخرجه الله من ولايته إلى ولاية الشيطان فلا يقبله الشيطانالكافي ج ٢ ص ٣٥٨.“Al-Kafi: Muhammad ibn Yahya, from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Isa, from Muhammad ibn Sinan, from Mufaddal ibn Umar, who said: Abu…
0 notes
Text
✨Critical Role is a makeover show ✨
#critical role#critical role fanart#essek thelyss#matt mercer#bells hells#cr 3#cr cast#kaawro art#kaawro comic#does this count as defamation lmao
10K notes
·
View notes
Text

#new york#democratic representative#alexandria ocasio cortez#aoc#ask#anti defamation league#elon musk
1K notes
·
View notes
Text

civvies
#call of duty#cod#simon ghost riley#john soap mactavish#john price#kyle gaz garrick#my art#this is just after Simon's bi-yearly haircut by an actual barber#and not over the kitchen sink#is it any surprise that Gaz has the most style? no#Soap is somehow the least-douchey douchebag north of the border#Price is contemplating where his marriage went wrong despite being an eternal bachelor#and if my only accomplishment in this fandom is to defame Ghost for his unequivocal lack of swag#so be it~
7K notes
·
View notes
Note
I just want you to know that I was rereading the PDMDZS comics yet again, and I finally caved and watched Legally Blonde because you're like a puppeteer that draws things and I'm like "well, guess I have to see it now." Now, after watching Legally Blonde, I must tell you that Elle Woods is love, Elle Woods is life, Elle Woods is everything to me. Elle Woods would have been able to save Wei Wuxian from the Jins all while looking sparkly and fantastic as she does it. (Obviously with her hype girlies in the background)
Her power and influence know no bounds!
#ask#elle woods#legally blonde#Of all medias to have indirectly convinced someone to see for the first time - I am so honoured to know one of them was legally blonde.#It's just a damn good movie about not letting other's bias limit you.#And to not let other people's shitty opinions of you define you!#It's also about how femininity is constantly regarded as something that is a 'weakness' but Elle shows up in pink! Stays true to herself!#Legally Blonde is the antithesis to Grease. That's a rant for another day#If you're willing to keep trusting me...There's a musical version of legally blonde that is very good.#Anyways. Elle Woods can't be in MDZS only because she would have solved so many problems that are essential for the plot to happen.#Elle would have lawyered the hell out of all of the defamation and war crimes going on.#Elle would have shown up with a big ass sword and won the war.#It's just me doing my part by having her be WWX phone lawyer as a running gag.
476 notes
·
View notes
Text
It’s been awhile! First post on here in years. I created this is 2018 for a PBR composition. Still got legs! 🍻
0 notes
Text
“The ADL refused to endorse Harris! The only reason the ADL didn’t endorse Trump is that they knew their Jewish base would be angry!”
The reason the ADL didn’t endorse Harris is the same reason they didn’t endorse Trump: the ADL doesn’t endorse candidates. They’re a 501(c)(3) organization.
411 notes
·
View notes
Text
This whole ADL vs. Wikipedia thing feels like it's part of a wider attempt by bad actors to use the I/P conflict as a convenient excuse to unfairly discredit Jewish advocacy groups, and that concerns me.
808 notes
·
View notes
Text
Anatomy of a Fall (2023) dir. Justine Triet // Interview with the Vampire season 2 episode 7 (2024) dir. Emma Freeman
#anatomy of a fall#justine triet#sandra huller#film#interview with the vampire#iwtvedit#iwtv#iwtv spoilers#jacob anderson#louis de pointe du lac#tv#*#q#dsg#emma freeman#*misc#women directors#it's likely there will be a more appropriate moment to parallel this with in the next episode but whatever I need the thought out of my hea#bc YEAH this WAS a defamation trial following IPV
723 notes
·
View notes
Text
She doesn’t like anyone but Xaden, and she only tolerates me, though I’m growing on her. Like a tumor.

fourth wing - ch. 36

iron flame - ch. 65

onyx storm - ch. 62
#you are so annoying i hate you i hate you *sgaeyl rocking violet back and forth patting her back humming a lullabye*#<- what they sound like to me#love how at first Vi was like I don't need your approval ☝️🤨 to haha really?you think i did good? you were so great as well haha😊😊😊#tairn violet sgaeyl xaden dynamic is really interesting to me#did tairn ask sgaeyl to look after violet? how did that conversation go? of course she'll do anything her mate asks her to but i love how#annoyed she is about it.#she hauled ass to the wrong direction. snatched Vi off the ground just in time. bashed and complimented her in the same breath. tossed her#in a raging storm so she can fly back to the OTHER pain in her ass�� because she can't leave Xaden for that long despite everything#that went down. the dragon known for not giving a fuck about any rule or anything or anyone won't risk xaden!!! won't risk violet!!!#don't even get me started on when tairn stayed behind to make sure xaden dont die *keels over convulsing frothing at the mouth*#***grabs your hand as we step into traffic***#sgaeylposting <3 this diva <3 her love language is words of defamation#violet sorrengail#sgaeyl#violet and sgaeyl#violet and tairn#tairn#xaden and sgaeyl#reread notes#the empyrean#fourth wing#iron flame#onyx storm#onyx storm spoilers#rebecca yarros#the empyrean spoilers#the empyrean series#xadenviolet
278 notes
·
View notes
Text
I was thinking about that one unused(I think?) poster
(discord words from @thespiusbf
#this is under the assumption inspekta drew the posters herself#great god grove#ggg spoilers#great god grove spoilers#transfem on transfem defamation#inspekta#king ggg#marart
228 notes
·
View notes
Text
On recent far-left attacks on the Anti-Defamation League
Before we start:
- I think the ADL is wrong about Musk's salutes.
- I think the ADL's Israel advocacy sometimes comes into conflict with their mission in the diaspora. I think their methodologies for data collection and reporting need improvement.
- I think that the ADL is flawed, imperfect and does much more good than harm.
---
Christopher Hitchens put into words what academics used to live by:
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence".
The burden of proof is on those making the claim, and the claims of droptheadl.org aren't supported with primary sources or evidence.
For example:
To support its claims about the ADL and SNCC, droptheadl.org offers a link, presenting it as a citation.

This is a link to a Google Books entry. There's no actual text, no citation, no chapter, no page, just the claim that somewhere in this 300-page book exists proof of the ADL denouncing SNCC as racist.
However, that's not in the book. Chapter two talks about this incident in detail, so I read it.
In reaponse to a SNCC newsletter (this is what a primary source looks like!) containing many factual errors about Israel,
...Morris Abram, president of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), summed up their outrage: “Anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism whether it comes from the Ku Klux Klan or from extremist Negro groups
[For those who haven't studied the era: at this point, "Negro" was still the word which the black community preferred. The transition to widespread identification as 'black' got going in the 60s and finished in the 70s. The use of the word 'Negro' here is not a slur. I state this in advance because I know how the illiberal left weilds its willful ignorance]
...
Abram was also careful to echo what the ADL had said: that SNCC’s article put it in the same anti-Israeli trench as the Arab world and the Soviet Union.
That's verifiably, unquestionably true. That's the position SNCC took, because that's where they got their information.
Droptheadl.org lied. This book doesn't say what they claim it says, which is why they didn't quote it or offer a specific citation. Why let facts get in the way of the narrative which makes them feel good about themselves?
The book, which I recommend reading, isn't about the ADL. It's a scholarly examination of the relationships between the wars the Arab world launched on Israel and the US Civil Rights Movement. This requires much discussion of the impact on the complex relationships between black communities and Jewish communities in the US in the context of their views on Israel and Palestine.
It's fascinating. Here's another excerpt illustrating why many Jews saw SNCC as taking an antisemitic turn:
One day in May of 1967, [Stokely] Carmichael and [H. Rap] Brown were in Alabama chatting with Donald Jelinek, a lawyer who worked with SNCC.
Jelinek, who was Jewish, expressed his positive feelings about Israel and his concerns about the Jewish state’s situation in that tension-filled month as war clouds were on the horizon in the Middle East.
“So it was a shock to me,” Jelinek later recounted, “when my SNCC friends mildly indicated support for the Arabs.” Mildly stated or not, their sentiments prompted Jelinek to reply, “But they may wipe out and destroy Israel.”
Carmichael adroitly changed the subject with some humor, and the men began laughing.
Jelinek thereafter overheard Brown quietly singing to himself, “arms for the Arabs, sneakers for the Jews.” When Jelinek asked him what that song meant, an embarrassed Brown explained that he had learned the song as a student in Louisiana. It implied that the Israelis would need sneakers (tennis shoes) to run from the Arabs, who were armed with weapons from abroad.
My qualms with this, my disappointment in and disagreement with both Carmichael and Brown doesn't make me a racist. It doesn't make the AJC or the ADL racist and it doesn't make Jelinek, the Jewish lawyer working with SNCC, a racist or a poor ally.
Zionism is the belief that Jews should have self-determination in their homeland.
Nazism was the belief that racially superior Aryans own the world, should be organized through fascist methods, and that the genocide of the Jewish people was explicitly required because they were the source of all evil and the obstacle to progress.
These are not the same. Suggesting they are the same, as Carmichael did, is morally and intellectually bankrupt. Pointing this out doesn't make me a racist. It makes me literate.
I still own a copy of Carmichael's book, Black Power. Carmichael (who later changed his name to Kwame Ture) was a complex person. Like every other historical figure, he was neither a saint nor a demon.
I can admire a lot about the Black Panthers without falsely claiming that nothing they ever did or said was troubling, poorly reasoned, or bigoted. The world is more complex than that.
There are no saints. Learn this important truth and use it to guide your understanding of the world around you. There are no saints.
Gandhi, for instance, was a great leader for Indian self-rule and a visionary of nonviolent protest. He was also a racist as a young man who said black people "...are troublesome, very dirty and live like animals." Read about his work in South Africa. He was also really weird about sex and slept naked with his grand niece, which we rightly recognize today as sexual abuse. He wasn't a saint or a demon, he was a person.
People are complex and flawed. If you want to understand people, history, and movements, wrap your head around this as keep it with you: People and their movements are complex and flawed.
But the depth of reasoning I see from the illiberal left is "ADL criticized SNCC, so they're Nazis."
No, child. The world is much, much more complex than that. Why did you go to college if you weren't going to learn anything there?
My 14yo is right. US leftists (not liberals, leftists) are allergic to nuance and discard the facts contradicting any narrative which makes them feel good about themselves.
Selah
Deep breath in, slow breath out.
The book is really delves into some of the factors contributing to the deteriorating relationship at the time between Jewish Americans and Black Americans. It points to this essay by James Baldwin, titled "Negroes Are Anti-Semitic Because They're Anti-White." I urge you to read it, it is a fascinating artifact of its time and place.
And this:
Jews had long advocated for black liberation by, for example, playing a role in the foundation of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909. Jewish support for blacks was well known; as early as February of 1942, the American Jewish Committee published a study titled “Jewish Contribution to Negro Welfare.” Having experienced the sting of anti-Semitism, many Jews believed they were fighting in the same trench against discrimination alongside African Americans. When the civil rights struggle grew to become a mass movement in the 1950s and early 1960s, Jewish moral and financial support was crucial, and Jews were disproportionately well-represented among those whites who lent their support to the cause. Jewish financial contributions to civil rights groups were also significant. Jews even were the subject of criticism from some southern whites for the high-profile role they played in helping blacks win their freedom. All this compounded a sense of betrayal by SNCC that was felt by many Jewish Americans.
It should not be surprising or taken as racist that Jews objected to SNCC's advocacy against Israel's existence and I maintain that any call for Israel to be destroyed is innately, inarguably antisemitic. No other nation endures calls for its destruction. Just the Jewish one.
There was unquestionably tension between SNCC and the entire spectrum of non-black Americans who supported SNCC when SNCC ejected non-black members. From our perspective, decades removed, I can understand both why SNCC members narrowly voted for this AND why non-black members of SNCC were hurt and disillusioned. All of those perspectives were (and are) valid.
When I was an undergrad studying African American Political Thought, we discussed these tensions head-on, using primary sources, and evaluated them dispassionately.
We concluded that there are no villains in this story. SNCC got a bunch of facts wrong about Israel, their staunch Jewish allies were profoundly disappointed, saw hypocrisy in SNCC's position, and said so.
I think that far left Americans overlaid their feelings about a domestic struggle on a foreign one where they don't fit...and then discarded the facts and the complexity which got in the way of a satisfying narrative which made them feel like the good guys instead of forcing them to grapple with an uncomfortably complex reality.
I think that's what the illiberal left still does. It doesn't like complexity, it doesn't like academic rigor, it likes stories it can tell itself about its moral purity and discards facts, complexity, or rigor which threaten their view of themselves as saviors.
The world is complex. People are complex. Movements are complex. Organizations are complex. History is complex. Justice is complex.
The ADL isn't perfect, its leaders haven't been and are not saints or tzadikim, but the good they do for all Americans radically outweighs their failings and I'm going to keep supporting them while yelling at them to do better.
If you're an ADL hater and have any actual evidence and primary sources on racism from the ADL, I really want to see it, because this weak sauce from droptheadl.org doesn't make the case the illiberal left thinks it makes. And they'd know that if they had learned anything in college about how scholarship works and how arguments are constructed.
The illiberal left perhaps forgets how the ADL responded when Trump called for requiring American Muslims to register.
“If one day Muslim Americans will be forced to register their identities, then that is the day that this proud Jew will register as a Muslim. ”
- ADL chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt
#illiberal left#sncc#Adl#leftist antisemitism#black panthers#jumblr#Black Power and Palestine#anti defamation league#elon musk#Nuance#History#Us history#Intellectual honesty#Intellectual integrity
215 notes
·
View notes
Text
just watched mclaren’s post gp interview and you have lando apologising AGAIN, for dragging that shitpile of a car within millimetres of the podium, only hindered by a penalty that wasn’t even his fault. and yet here he is, in his bare socks, thanking his fans, calmly explaining his side whilst holding himself accountable when he feels is necessary, holding out hope for the next gp despite it all.
so please enlighten me, where does the “lando is a childish whiny arrogant prick” consensus stem from exactly? and why do so many people push forward that narrative just for the sake of appealing to a larger audience?
#disliking him out of rivalry is one thing#but if you need to falsely defame a driver’s character to hold up your own#what does that really say about the nature of the driver you represent#lando norris#austin gp 2024#f1
186 notes
·
View notes
Text
Awwww. Hae-in wanted him to sue everyone who bad-mouthed her after she died and he's already on it
Ep 6:

403 notes
·
View notes