#defame

[defameart]

Graham Ingels inspired piece from 2022

[noorulhasan786]

The Spiritual and Moral Consequences of Slander: A Reflection on Hadith from Al-Kafi

بسمہ تعالی – الكافي: محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن محمد بن سنان، عن مفضل بن عمر قال: قال أبو عبد الله عليه السلام: من روى على مؤمن رواية يريد بها شينه وهدم مروته ليسقط من أعين الناس أخرجه الله من ولايته إلى ولاية الشيطان فلا يقبله الشيطانالكافي ج ٢ ص ٣٥٨.“Al-Kafi: Muhammad ibn Yahya, from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Isa, from Muhammad ibn Sinan, from Mufaddal ibn Umar, who said: Abu…

[rightnewshindi]

युवती का नहाते हुए बनाया वीडियो, शारीरिक संबंध बनाने की डिमांड, बोला, नहीं मानी तो कर देंगे बदनाम

युवती का नहाते हुए बनाया वीडियो, शारीरिक संबंध बनाने की डिमांड, बोला, नहीं मानी तो कर देंगे बदनाम #News #RightNewsIndia #RightNews #RajasthanNews #IndiaNews

Rajasthan News: कठूमर थाना अंतर्गत एक गांव की 23 वर्षीय युवती ने रविवार को रिपोर्ट दर्ज कराई कि गांव के ही करीब दो दर्जन लोगों ने मेरे परिजनों के साथ मारपीट की तथा गत वर्ष 2023 में नहाते समय उसकी वीडियो बना ली गई थी और उस पर शारीरिक संबंध बनाने के दबाव और छेड़छाड़ करते रहते थे. परिजनों द्वारा उलाना देने पर मारपीट पर जान से मारने की धमकी दी गई थी. उसी बात को लेकर दोपहर 7 सितंबर 2024 को 12:00 करीब…

[quietsphere]

✨Critical Role is a makeover show ✨

[hussyknee]

Wikipedia’s editors have voted to declare the Anti-Defamation League “generally unreliable” on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, adding it to a list of banned and partially banned sources. An overwhelming majority of editors involved in the debate about the ADL also voted to deem the organization unreliable on the topic of antisemitism, its core focus. A formal declaration on that count is expected next. The decision about Israel-related citations, made last week, means that one of the most prominent and longstanding Jewish advocacy groups in the United States — and one historically seen as the leading U.S. authority on antisemitism — is now grouped together with the National Inquirer, Newsmax, and Occupy Democrats as a source of propaganda or misinformation in the eyes of the online encyclopedia. Moreover, in a near consensus, dozens of Wikipedia editors involved in the discussion said they believe the ADL should not be cited for factual information on antisemitism as well because it acts primarily as a pro-Israel organization and tends to label legitimate criticism of Israel as antisemitism.

Imagine pouring millions into Hasbara for decades just to lose the information war this fucking badly lmaooo

Anyway, plugging my masterlist of Palestinian media and sources again:

[wombywoo]

civvies

[kropotkindersurprise]

Once again we're reminded: Fuck the ADL, its an Israeli supremacist group and nothing more.

[rebel-girl-queen-of-my-world]

The ADL is not a trusted source. Not on antisemitism. And not Palestine or Israel. An independent audit of the ADL’s antisemitism data, as well as the editors of Wikipedia, all agree.

The ADL mislabels antisemitism in service of the Israeli government’s hate campaign against Palestinians. It distorts its own data and manipulates its findings. In doing so, the ADL has caused incalculable harm to Palestinians and those who defend Palestinian rights. It has also chosen to minimize the terrifying growth of organized white supremacy, and ignored white nationalism’s increased threat to Jewish people. The ADL’s distorted data makes Jews less safe. We all deserve better.

On the same day that news broke that Wikipedia’s editors had declared the ADL unreliable on issues related to Palestine and Israel — and likely antisemitism as well — Jewish Currents published an investigation into the ADL’s data, pointing out that “serious statistical analysis [should be] done by an organization not beholden to Israel advocacy.”

The Jewish Currents’ audit of the ADL’s own data proves that, once the ADL’s anti-Palestinian and pro-Israeli government bias was removed, white nationalists are the driving force behind all forms of antisemitism. The audit also showed that the ADL’s reporting may “significantly undercount right-wing antisemitic incidents.” In short, the ADL’s attempts to smear the movement for Palestinian freedom not only provided cover for the real source of antisemitism (white supremacy), but actually minimized the “stunning growth of organized white nationalism.” None of this makes anyone safe.

On the same day, in a near unanimous vote, Wikipedia editors declared the ADL to be “generally unreliable” on Palestine and Israel, adding it to a list of sources of propaganda or misinformation that includes the National Inquirer and Newsmax. Wikipedia editors also said that “the ADL should not be cited for factual information on antisemitism as well because it acts primarily as a pro-Israel organization and tends to label legitimate criticism of Israel as antisemitism.”

[kdmiller55]

For the Sake of His Name

For the Sake of His Name

1 In the seventh year, in the fifth month, on the tenth day of the month, certain of the elders of Israel came to inquire of the Lord, and sat before me. 2 And the word of the Lord came to me: 3 “Son of man, speak to the elders of Israel, and say to them, Thus says the Lord God, Is it to inquire of me that you come? As I live, declares the Lord God, I will not be inquired of by you. 4 Will you…

[baroque-hashem]

This whole ADL vs. Wikipedia thing feels like it's part of a wider attempt by bad actors to use the I/P conflict as a convenient excuse to unfairly discredit Jewish advocacy groups, and that concerns me.

[defameart]

It’s been awhile! First post on here in years. I created this is 2018 for a PBR composition. Still got legs! 🍻

[shesnake]

Anatomy of a Fall (2023) dir. Justine Triet // Interview with the Vampire season 2 episode 7 (2024) dir. Emma Freeman

[swampthingking]

andrew’s definitely gotten in trouble with his pr manager for tweeting things along the lines of:

“no mania inducing medication will compare to the euphoria i will feel the day donald trump drops dead”

[destielmemenews]

The five men claim in a federal lawsuit that Trump knew he was acting with “reckless disregard” for the truth when he said during the September debate with Vice President Kamala Harris that they pleaded guilty to crimes connected to the beating and raping a woman in New York City, and that the five teenagers “badly hurt a person, killed a person” in the attack.

“Defendant Trump’s statements were false and defamatory in numerous respects,” attorneys for the men, now all in their 50s, wrote in the lawsuit filed in federal court in Philadelphia. “Plaintiffs never pled guilty to the Central Park assaults. Plaintiffs all pled not guilty and maintained their innocence throughout their trial and incarceration, as well as after they were released from prison.”

“None of the victims of the Central Park assaults were killed,” the lawyers for Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron Brown and Korey Wise wrote.

source 1

source 2

source 3

The Central Park Five and Trump, Explained by NPR

[melandolia]

just watched mclaren’s post gp interview and you have lando apologising AGAIN, for dragging that shitpile of a car within millimetres of the podium, only hindered by a penalty that wasn’t even his fault. and yet here he is, in his bare socks, thanking his fans, calmly explaining his side whilst holding himself accountable when he feels is necessary, holding out hope for the next gp despite it all.

so please enlighten me, where does the “lando is a childish whiny arrogant prick” consensus stem from exactly? and why do so many people push forward that narrative just for the sake of appealing to a larger audience?

[fake-married-my-dead-fiance]

Awwww. Hae-in wanted him to sue everyone who bad-mouthed her after she died and he's already on it

Ep 6: