#dairy farming cruelty

[devoted1989]

Anti-suckling braces are attached to the nostrils of cattle. The anti-suckling brace prevents calves from nursing with mothers or other cattle.

The prevention device clamps on the nose by means of a screw. Some have spikes to ensure that the cow rejects the calf's efforts at suckling.

If you search for “anti-suckling device calves” online you will find dozens of these for sale.

Image found on Pinterest.

[morethansalad]

No one told me Sorsha moved to TikTok! 👑 (@/sorshamorava)

[oca-rinn-a]

The Ethics of What We Eat, Singer and Mason, published 2006

[superfuxkinghungry]

We hear your cries, we feel your pain, and we are fighting to stop the absolute evilness of the human race, putting you through torture and not regarding your life at all, inflicting extremely unneeded abuse and neglection upon your desparate, suffering, helpless, and loving souls. We will never stop fighting to end the demand and supply of animal products and slaughterhouses globally and save you from a world of pain, that has happened to trillions of animals at the bloody hands of every slaughterhouse worker and animal product consumer! FUCK NON VEGANS WHO ACTIVELY PAY FOR ANIMAL PRODUCTS KNOWING THE SUFFERING THAT COMES WITH IT!!! Anyone can make a difference! 💓💓💓💓

[terminabense]

  "Factory Farming: Cruelty Impacting Humans, Animals, and the Planet"

Factory farming, the industrialized production of livestock, has dire consequences for humans, animals, and the planet. For animals, it means a life of suffering in overcrowded, unsanitary conditions, often without access to natural behaviors or environments. Chickens, pigs, and cows endure unimaginable stress, injuries, and premature deaths, all for the sake of maximizing efficiency and profit.

For humans, factory farming poses significant health risks. The overuse of antibiotics in livestock to promote growth and prevent disease leads to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, posing a serious threat to public health. Workers in these facilities face dangerous conditions, exposure to harmful chemicals, and exploitative labor practices. Furthermore, communities near factory farms suffer from polluted air and water, leading to respiratory problems and other health issues.

Environmentally, factory farming is a major contributor to climate change, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. It generates large amounts of greenhouse gases, particularly methane from cattle, which significantly impacts global warming. Additionally, the industry consumes vast quantities of water and contributes to soil degradation and water pollution through runoff of animal waste and chemicals.

In summary, factory farming's quest for profit comes at an enormous cost to animal welfare, human health, and the environment. Sustainable and humane alternatives are essential for a healthier, more ethical future.

[engagedtobefree]

It's really strange to me how some people only criticize plastic through the lens of it being "vegan plastic", as if non-vegans aren't also using plastic products, including fake leather. The same with slave labor and crops. Like I've literally seen someone say how harmful vegan vegetables are in agriculture and I'm just like, do you only eat meat??? Do you not eat vegetables??? I just don't understand the whole "if you're vegan and not using animal products then you love slave labor and plastic". Consuming animal products doesn't automatically mean you're not using plastic or buying anything that was produced from slave labor in the same way that being vegan doesn't mean animals aren't getting killed somewhere along in the process of you getting food on your plate. Also, using animal products doesn't automatically mean good for the environment, cuz usually somewhere along the way there's some type of harmful process being used.

I think maybe people don't realize just how ingrained plastic is. It's not some evil vegan villain wearing head-to-toe pleather that is upholding the plastic industry. Take a look around the room and identify everything you see that is plastic. Then think about all the plastic you don't see. And is it really only vegans buying from shein, temu, forever 21, etc? For some people, that's all they can afford, but for so many other people that isn't the case. Is it really so hard to acknowledge that it's literally an exploitative, capitalistic world that has done all of this and NOT vegans? Is it so hard to acknowledge that we all take part in these harmful practices in some way because they've been so interwoven into our society that there's no way to avoid it? What is so difficult to understand about any of that? At this point, I'm half-convinced some billionaires got together and brainstormed on "Who can we blame" and then collectively decided on vegans, and unfortunately some people actually took the bait.

Also, these arguments constantly erase poor people unless it's framed in the context of the vegan diet not being affordable to everyone. Organic, sustainable, fair-trade etc etc products are not cheap. It's not only vegan products that can be non-affordable.

This whole moral superiority (and also flat-out cruelty to each other) can be on BOTH sides and it's really frustrating that the one side won't admit it. Eating meat doesn't automatically make you a saint and non-complicit in harmful practices in the same way being a vegan doesn't either.

It's just...people. People are the worst. The only way to save the planet is for us to literally go extinct.

[anamika7282]

10 Billion Lives

[tuhinnseo]

Live Export Suffering: The Hidden Cruelty of Global Animal Trade

The global trade of live animals for slaughter, known as live export, is a practice fraught with controversy and suffering. Every year, millions of animals are transported across long distances, often enduring appalling conditions that lead to immense physical and psychological stress. This article delves into the various facets of live export suffering, exploring the impact on animals, the ethical implications, and the growing calls for change.

The Journey of Suffering

The live export process begins on farms and ends in foreign slaughterhouses, with animals subjected to harsh and often inhumane conditions throughout their journey.

Inhumane Transport Conditions: Animals are typically crammed into ships or trucks where they have little room to move. Overcrowding can lead to trampling and injuries. The lack of ventilation, coupled with extreme temperatures, can cause heat stress, dehydration, and exhaustion. Many animals do not survive the journey.

Lengthy Voyages: Live export routes often involve journeys that last several weeks. During these prolonged periods, animals are deprived of adequate food, water, and rest. The stress of constant motion, noise, and confinement takes a severe toll on their health and well-being.

Disease and Injury: The close quarters and unsanitary conditions create a breeding ground for diseases. Injuries are common, and sick or injured animals often do not receive veterinary care. The spread of infectious diseases not only affects the animals but can also pose significant biosecurity risks.

Ethical and Welfare Concerns

The suffering endured by animals during live export raises significant ethical and welfare concerns.

Lack of Regulation and Oversight: Many countries involved in live export have insufficient regulations to protect animal welfare. Even when regulations exist, enforcement is often weak, and violations are rarely punished. This lack of oversight allows for ongoing cruelty.

Cultural and Slaughter Practices: Animals exported to countries with different cultural and religious practices may face slaughter methods that are not consistent with those in their country of origin. These practices can involve prolonged and painful procedures, compounding the suffering of the animals.

Psychological Stress: The psychological impact of live export on animals is profound. The fear and anxiety experienced during transport, coupled with the sudden changes in environment and handling, lead to immense psychological stress. Animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain and distress, making the ethical implications of live export particularly concerning.

Economic and Environmental Impact

While live export is often justified on economic grounds, it comes with significant economic and environmental costs.

Economic Inefficiencies: The financial benefits of live export are often overstated. The costs associated with animal losses, disease outbreaks, and the enforcement of regulations can outweigh the economic gains. Investing in local slaughtering facilities and processing can provide economic benefits while ensuring better animal welfare.

Environmental Degradation: The transportation of live animals over long distances has a considerable environmental footprint. The emissions from ships and trucks contribute to pollution and climate change. Additionally, the waste produced during transport can contaminate land and water sources.

For More Information Click Here : crueltyfarm 

Moving Towards Change

Addressing the suffering caused by live export requires comprehensive action from governments, industry stakeholders, and consumers.

Policy Reform: Governments need to implement and enforce stringent regulations to protect animal welfare during transport. This includes setting maximum journey times, ensuring adequate space, ventilation, food, and water, and holding violators accountable.

Alternative Practices: Encouraging the development of local slaughtering and processing facilities can reduce the need for live export. This approach not only improves animal welfare but also supports local economies and reduces environmental impact.

Consumer Awareness: Raising awareness about the suffering associated with live export can drive consumer demand for ethically produced meat. By choosing products from sources that prioritize animal welfare, consumers can help create a market that values humane treatment.

Support for Animal Welfare Organizations: Supporting organizations that advocate for animal rights and welfare can amplify efforts to end live export suffering. These organizations play a crucial role in raising awareness, influencing policy, and providing aid to animals in distress.

eventually

Live export is a practice that inflicts significant suffering on millions of animals each year. The inhumane conditions, lack of regulatory oversight, and ethical implications make it a pressing issue that requires immediate action. By advocating for policy reform, supporting local alternatives, and raising consumer awareness, we can work towards a future where animals are treated with the compassion and respect they deserve. Ending live export suffering is not only an ethical imperative but also a step towards a more sustainable and humane food system.

[seogoogle1]

Untold Stories of Factory Farm Cruelty: Shedding Light on Animal Suffering

In the bustling metropolis of modern society, there exists a hidden realm obscured from public view, where the silent cries of billions of voiceless creatures echo within the walls of industrialized confinement. These are the untold stories of factory farm cruelty, narratives of suffering and exploitation etched into the fabric of our food system. While the glossy veneer of supermarket shelves may obscure the grim reality, beneath lies a world fraught with unimaginable torment.

Factory farming, with its emphasis on efficiency and profit, has transformed the once pastoral image of agriculture into a dystopian landscape where animals are reduced to mere commodities, stripped of their inherent worth and subjected to unspeakable horrors. Behind closed doors, away from prying eyes, lies a labyrinth of confinement and cruelty, where the principles of compassion and empathy are sacrificed at the altar of mass production.

The first whispers of these untold stories emerge from the heart of factory farms, where overcrowded and unsanitary conditions serve as the backdrop for a life of perpetual suffering. In cramped cages and barren enclosures, animals are deprived of the most basic freedoms, condemned to a life devoid of sunlight, fresh air, and the ability to engage in natural behaviors. Pigs, confined to gestation crates barely larger than their own bodies, are forced to endure a living hell, unable to even turn around or lie down comfortably. Chickens, crammed into battery cages so small they cannot spread their wings, suffer from broken bones and feather loss, their lives reduced to a cycle of despair.

But perhaps the most harrowing aspect of factory farm cruelty lies not in the physical confines, but in the psychological torment inflicted upon these sentient beings. Denied the opportunity to express their natural instincts, animals are driven to the brink of madness, their spirits broken by a relentless onslaught of stress and despair. From the incessant clanking of metal bars to the overpowering stench of ammonia, every aspect of their environment serves as a reminder of their subjugation, leaving psychological scars that may never heal.

Yet, even in the face of such adversity, the resilience of these animals shines through in moments of quiet defiance. From the mother pig who fiercely protects her young despite the confines of her cage to the chicken who refuses to surrender her will to live, there exists a flicker of hope amidst the darkness—a reminder that even in the bleakest of circumstances, the spirit of compassion cannot be extinguished.

The untold stories of factory farm cruelty extend beyond the confines of the farm itself, casting a shadow that stretches far and wide across the landscape of our society. From the environmental degradation wrought by industrialized agriculture to the public health risks posed by the overuse of antibiotics, the ripple effects of factory farming are felt by all, regardless of whether or not they choose to acknowledge them.

It is a testament to the power of ignorance and complacency that these stories remain untold, hidden beneath a veil of secrecy perpetuated by an industry that profits from our collective apathy. Yet, as the demand for transparency and accountability continues to grow, so too does the opportunity for change. Through education and advocacy, we have the power to shine a light into the darkest corners of factory farming, exposing the truth behind the glossy facade and demanding justice for those who cannot speak for themselves.

In the pursuit of a more humane and sustainable future, it is imperative that we confront the untold stories of factory farm cruelty head-on, challenging the status quo and demanding an end to the exploitation of sentient beings. By choosing compassion over convenience and empathy over indifference, we can rewrite the narrative of our food system, creating a world where the untold stories of factory farm cruelty are replaced with tales of resilience, liberation, and hope.

In conclusion, the untold stories of factory farm cruelty serve as a stark reminder of the ethical and moral implications of our food choices. By confronting these narratives with courage and compassion, we have the power to spark a revolution rooted in empathy and justice—a revolution that transcends the boundaries of species and embraces the inherent worth of all living beings. Let us heed the call of conscience and stand in solidarity with the voiceless, for in their liberation lies the true measure of our humanity.

website: cruelty.farm

[rimaakter45]

नैतिक शाकाहारी भोजन: एक स्वस्थ, दयालु और अधिक टिकाऊ जीवन शैली

परिचय:

हाल के वर्षों में, नैतिक शाकाहार ने महत्वपूर्ण आकर्षण प्राप्त किया है, और अच्छे कारण से। पशु कल्याण, मानव स्वास्थ्य और पर्यावरणीय स्थिरता के बारे में बढ़ती चिंताओं के साथ, बढ़ती संख्या में लोग नैतिक शाकाहारी जीवन शैली का विकल्प चुन रहे हैं। यह लेख की अवधारणा पर प्रकाश डालता हैनैतिक शाकाहारी भोजन, आम गलतफहमियों को दूर करते हुए जानवरों, मानव स्वास्थ्य और ग्रह के लिए इसके लाभों की खोज करना।

पशु कल्याण

नैतिक शाकाहार के पीछे प्राथमिक प्रेरणा जानवरों को होने वाले नुकसान को कम करने की इच्छा है। नैतिक शाकाहारी मांस, डेयरी, अंडे और शहद सहित किसी भी पशु उत्पाद का सेवन करने से बचते हैं। इस जीवनशैली को अपनाकर, व्यक्तियों ने सक्रिय रूप से खाद्य उद्योग में जानवरों के शोषण को समाप्त कर दिया।

फैक्ट्री फार्मिंग, जहां जानवरों को भीड़भाड़, कैद और क्रूर प्रथाओं का शिकार बनाया जाता है, एक बड़ी चिंता का विषय है। नैतिक शाकाहारी इन उद्योगों से अपना समर्थन वापस लेने का विकल्प चुनते हैं, सक्रिय रूप से एक दयालु विकल्प को बढ़ावा देते हैं। पशु उत्पादों का बहिष्कार करके, नैतिक शाकाहारी लोग जानवरों की पीड़ा को कम करने में योगदान देते हैं, एक ऐसी दुनिया की वकालत करते हैं जो सभी संवेदनशील प्राणियों का सम्मान और महत्व करती है।

स्वास्थ्य सुविधाएं

आम धारणा के विपरीत, नैतिक शाकाहार कई स्वास्थ्य लाभ प्रदान करने वाला सिद्ध हुआ है। एक सुनियोजित शाकाहारी आहार इष्टतम स्वास्थ्य के लिए आवश्यक सभी आवश्यक पोषक तत्व प्रदान कर सकता है। शाकाहार व्यक्तियों को फलों, सब्जियों, साबुत अनाज, नट्स और बीजों का सेवन बढ़ाने के लिए प्रोत्साहित करता है, जिसके परिणामस्वरूप पोषक तत्वों से भरपूर आहार मिलता है जिसमें संतृप्त वसा और कोलेस्ट्रॉल कम होता है।

अध्ययनों से लगातार पता चला है कि शाकाहारी लोगों में हृदय रोग, उच्च रक्तचाप, मोटापा और कुछ कैंसर की दर क��� होती है। पौधे-आधारित आहार पाचन तंत्र पर भी हल्का होता है, जिससे ऊर्जा का स्तर बढ़ता है और समग्र स्वास्थ्य में सुधार होता है। इसके अलावा, पशु उत्पादों को खत्म करने से मांस और डेयरी उपभोग से जुड़ी खाद्य जनित बीमारियों का खतरा काफी कम हो जाता है।

पर्यावरणीय प्रभाव

पशु कृषि के पर्यावरणीय प्रभाव को कम करके नहीं आंका जा सकता। पशुधन खेती को ग्रीनहाउस गैस उत्सर्जन, वनों की कटाई, भूमि क्षरण, जल प्रदूषण और प्रजातियों के विलुप्त होने में महत्वपूर्ण योगदानकर्ता के रूप में पहचाना गया है। नैतिक शाकाहारी जीवनशैली अपनाकर, व्यक्ति जलवायु परिवर्तन से निपटने और भावी पीढ़ियों के लिए ग्रह को संरक्षित करने में सक्रिय भूमिका निभा सकते हैं।

यह सिद्ध हो चुका है कि पशु उत्पादों से भरपूर आहार की तुलना में पौधे आधारित आहार में कार्बन फुटप्रिंट कम होता है। कृषि पशुओं को खिलाने के लिए आवश्यक फसलों के लिए बड़ी मात्रा में भूमि और जल संसाधनों की आवश्यकता होती है, जिससे अंततः वनों की कटाई और पानी की कमी होती है। पौधों के स्रोतों से सीधे उपभोग करके, नैतिक शाकाहारी पानी के संरक्षण, ग्रीनहाउस गैस उत्सर्जन को कम करने और जैव विविधता की रक्षा करने में मदद करते हैं।

गलतफहमियों को दूर करना

नैतिक शाकाहार के पक्ष में ढेर सारे सबूत होने के बावजूद, कई गलतफहमियाँ बनी हुई हैं। शाकाहार के खिलाफ सबसे आम तर्कों में से एक यह धारणा है कि पौधे-आधारित आहार में आवश्यक पोषक तत्वों, विशेष रूप से प्रोटीन और विटामिन बी 12 की कमी होती है। हालाँकि, उचित योजना और ज्ञान के साथ, शाकाहारी लोग विभिन्न प्रकार के पौधों पर आधारित खाद्य पदार्थों को शामिल करके अपनी सभी पोषण संबंधी आवश्यकताओं को आसानी से पूरा कर सकते हैं।

यह भी ध्यान रखना महत्वपूर्ण है कि नैतिक शाकाहार प्रतिबंधात्मक भोजन या अभाव का पर्याय नहीं है। शाकाहार की बढ़ती लोकप्रियता के साथ, कई स्वादिष्ट पौधे-आधारित विकल्प सामने आए हैं, जो नैतिक शाकाहारियों को उनके मूल्यों से समझौता किए बिना, उन स्वादों और बनावटों का आनंद लेने की अनुमति देते हैं जो उन्हें हमेशा से पसंद रहे हैं।

निष्कर्ष:

नैतिक शाकाहार केवल एक आहार विकल्प से कहीं अधिक है; यह एक ऐसी जीवनशैली है जो करुणा, स्वास्थ्य और स्थिरता को बढ़ावा देती है। पशु कल्याण की रक्षा करके, व्यक्तिगत स्वास्थ्य में सुधार करके और पर्यावरणीय क्षति ���ो कम करके, नैतिक शाकाहारी सक्रिय रूप से एक दयालु, स्वस्थ और अधिक टिकाऊ दुनिया के निर्��ाण में योगदान करते हैं। ��ैतिक शाकाहारी भोजन को अपनाने से न केवल व्यक्तियों बल्कि हमारे ग्रह के सामूहिक भविष्य की भी सेवा होती है।

[jinjeriffic]

ARTE uploaded a haunting documentary on factory farming. Audio is French or German, subtitles are available in English, Spanish, Italian.

[devoted1989]

In commercial dairy systems cows are usually slaughtered at around 6 years old.

Image found on Pinterest.

[reasonsforhope]

"This week was a big win for animals across Mexico.

On December 2, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum signed a set of constitutional reforms that will pave the way for a comprehensive federal animal welfare law. The changes represent the first-ever mention of nonhuman animals in the Mexican Constitution, marking a milestone achievement for Mexico’s animal rights movement, which has for years been drawing attention to pervasive animal cruelty and extreme confinement in the country’s growing meat industry.

“This is huge,” says Dulce Ramirez, executive director of Animal Equality Mexico and the vice president of Animal Equality’s Latin American operations. These constitutional changes come after two years of campaigning by animal advocacy organizations, including Igualdad Animal Mexico, Humane Society International/Mexico (HSI/Mexico), and Movimiento Consciencia.

These reforms are internationally unique. While national animal protection laws aren’t uncommon, most countries have no mention of animals in their Constitutions. Constitutions are “a reflection of socially where we are,” Angela Fernandez, a law professor at the University of Toronto, told Vox, making any constitutional reform symbolically a big deal.

Beyond Mexico, nine countries include references to animals in their Constitutions, but those mentions have generally been brief and open to interpretation. “Mexico is different,” Kristen Stilt, faculty director at Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Program, told Vox. “It’s longer, it’s more specific. It’s in several provisions. It’s not just a general statement.”

Plenty of countries have laws against animal mistreatment, including the US, where all 50 states have an anti-cruelty law, but that doesn’t mean they’ve been particularly effective at stopping violence against animals. Part of the problem is that these laws very often exempt farmed animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens, thereby excluding from protection the overwhelming majority of animals that suffer at human hands. That’s where Mexico’s reforms stand out: They’re intended to protect all animals, including farmed animals and other exploited species.

The reforms in Mexico, the world’s largest Spanish-speaking country, represent a major advancement in the status of animals globally. It could set a precedent for other countries in Latin America, where a vibrant animal rights movement has emerged in recent years, said Macarena Montes Franceschini, a fellow at Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Program.

Still, as one of the world’s top producers of beef, chicken, pork, dairy, and eggs, Mexico has an intensive animal agriculture industry much like the US, says Antón Aguilar, HSI/Mexico’s executive director. Business interests will undoubtedly want to influence the writing of animal welfare laws that could impact their bottom lines, as they have in the US and elsewhere. The question now is what changes the constitutional reforms will really bring to animal law in Mexico, and how effective they will be.

What will these reforms do?

The reforms comprise changes to three separate articles of Mexico’s Constitution. The most foundational change amends the Constitution’s Article 73, which dictates what Congress has the authority to legislate on. The article now gives the federal government the power to issue laws on animal welfare and protection.

Previously, animal welfare was largely left up to local and state authorities, and the result has been uneven laws and enforcement across the country. While all states in Mexico have animal protection legislation, just three include farmed animals: Hidalgo, Colima, and as of last month, Oaxaca, following pressure from animal advocates. And though Mexico does have a federal law on animal health that focuses on farmed animals and includes some broad mentions of animal welfare, it was created to protect human health rather than animals. The same goes for Mexico’s federal wildlife law, which was written with a focus on sustainability and conservation, rather than on protecting individual animals from cruelty.

Perhaps the most significant part of the reforms is an amendment to Article 4 of Mexico’s Constitution prohibiting the mistreatment of animals and directing the Mexican state to guarantee the protection, adequate treatment, and conservation and care of animals. The language is broad, Ramirez says, but she sees it as a substantial improvement over existing animal welfare laws. She and other advocates worked to ensure that no animals were excluded, particularly given that farmed animals have historically been left out of animal protection.

“It’s really, really important in Mexico to start with this first step — but a big one — because now it’s all animals” that are covered, Ramirez said.

The changes to Articles 4 and 73 tee up the creation of federal legislation on animal welfare. Under these reforms, Mexico’s Congress has been directed to write a first-of-its-kind General Law of Animal Welfare, Care, and Protection, a comprehensive bill that would address and develop regulations preventing the mistreatment of all types of animals, including farmed animals, wildlife, animals in laboratories, and companion animals, Aguilar said.

This general animal welfare law will need to consider animals’“nature, characteristics and links with people,” according to the reform decree released last week. What does this actually mean? Ramirez gave the example of chickens: Part of the natural behavior of these animals is to be able to spread their wings and move around. But if chickens are stuck in cages, as is standard practice on egg factory farms, they can’t do either of those things. Now, the idea is to develop legal criteria that would consider the ability to express these natural behaviors as part of their welfare. (The language could also be interpreted to prioritize human needs, however — particularly the reference to animals’ “links with people.” Animal Equality said it would interpret this through an animal welfare lens, and with the word “link” invoking what humans owe animals.)

Finally, Article 3 of Mexico’s Constitution, which pertains to the education system, was also amended to require that animal welfare be included in school curricula for grade school and high school students. Aguilar said this change could help “attitudes shift and change in a very enduring, long-term way” for future generations. But the new constitutional language is unspecific, and the devil is in the details.

What’s next for animal welfare in Mexico

Advocates in Mexico have two focuses going forward, Ramirez and Aguilar said: shaping the general animal welfare bill into a strong piece of legislation, and working with the Ministry of Education to get meaningful implementation of animal welfare into the national curriculum."

[superfuxkinghungry]

People think that animals are less than us and that they were put on this earth to eat, but that was simply not true at all. They don't willingly let you torture them to death and slit their necks while they're still alive, thrashing desperately in agony and fear. If animals were put on this planet to eat, then why do they cry real tears and cry out in distress and fear on their way to being killed? If they were put on this earth to eat, why do they feel the same pain we do and express their terror when being abused, tortured, and slowly killed in slaughterhouses? There will never be an excuse to eating animals, dead OR alive. Because either way, the animal suffered greatly, and never got an apology, because of the total selfishness of the consumers, government, and slaughterhouse workers. To fix the world, we must start with our hearts, and know that what we eat, drink, and use isn't for ourselves, but for the animals that are forced to suffer terribly everyday until their death, the ones that have their children ripped from them at birth, and the ones that get gas chambered alive to suffer so you can eat your nasty piece of bacon! Veganism rules!!! 💓💓💓

[netscapenavigator-official]

People usually seem to understand that removing a wild animal from its wild habitat and placing it in a domestic one (like your home) is very bad, very dangerous, and very much animal cruelty.

Which makes it even more perplexing that so few people seem to understand that removing a domestic animal (like cats, dogs, some birds, domesticated horses, farm chickens, dairy cows, etc.) from its domestic habitat and placing it in the wild is very bad, very dangerous, and very much animal cruelty.

[ramshacklefey]

Dear Person who Loves Hating on Veganism,

Not all vegans are white, USian, or wealthy. In fact, those demographics aren't remotely representative of people who practice veganism.

Most vegans aren't obnoxious fucking idiots, and we hate the idiots as much as you. They're just louder, and people see them because they're obnoxious fucking idiots who won't shut the fuck up.

We're very aware of the fact that the agribusiness industry exploits and abuses workers who are disproportionately immigrants and people of color. There's a big overlap between people who are vegan and people who try to buy local produce that we can confirm is made ethically. Unfortunately, this is expensive, and see above point about most vegans not being wealthy.

It's impossible to buy fucking anything these days without it being made by exploited workers. It is possible to avoid buying products that are produced by both worker exploitation and unimaginable cruelty to animals. Harm reduction.

Many of us also try to avoid buying stuff (Palm oil, quinoa, etc) that causes massive ecological harm.

Vegan "replacements" for animal products are not necessary for being vegan.

We know that eating eggs doesn't hurt chickens, that taking wool doesn't hurt sheep, and that eating dairy doesn't hurt the animals it comes from. Those of us who aren't idiots are fine with animal products that come from animals who are well-treated.

The animals that produce eggs, wool, and dairy for mass consumption live in conditions that would be illegal to keep a pet in.

Opinions vary on killing animals for meat if they're otherwise well-treated through their lives.

Eating vegan is straight up cheaper than not as long as you don't insist on buying luxury items to replace every single animal product in your diet.

Plant-based milk is only more expensive than dairy in the USA because of the extent to which the US government subsides the dairy industry.

The amount of meat that USians eat is fucking insane, unhealthy, and ecologically unsustainable. If we enacted laws that required farmers to give their animals the space and care needed for them to be remotely healthy and kept up the current rate of meat and dairy production, something like 70% of the available arable land in the country would be going to animal farming.

Cattle farming is the largest source of methane emissions on the planet. Methane is far more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2. Reducing cattle farming would have a huge impact on global warming.

Humans are not carnivores. We aren't even omnivores, strictly speaking. We are primarily frugivores with a limited ability to digest animal products.

There is no nutritional benefit you get from animal products that is not available from plant-based food. Often, your body will obtain the nutrients more readily and efficiently from plants than from animal products.

The only exception to this I'm aware of is vitamin B12. This is because this vitamin doesn't come directly from plants, but from the soil they grow in, and most plants are washed too thoroughly and grown in unhealthy soil. Vitamin supplements can easily replace this.

There are innumerable health benefits to plant-based diets, even if you aren't fully vegan.

Most of us have pets. Most of us support caring, sustainable animal husbandry.

Whether or not you are vegan, you should, imo, be aware of the reality of how the animals you consume are treated. What you do with that information is your own business.

We would also like to launch PETA into the fucking sun.

Sincerely,

A Vegan Who Is Fucking Tired of This Bullshit.