#cromossomes

[cyberfemboyfungusprince]

Just found out I might be intersex and so much stuff is starting to make sense to me. I'm still unsure about it however and also scared to claim the label for myself since I'm not sure that my kind of variation would be accepted as inter by the community. I also plan on doing a cromossome exam next semester.

[hello-nichya-here]

I have a question that might be offensive, and I'm sorry in advance for any hurt it may cause. I've been trying to search for an answer online for a while but I'm not able to find a proper one, and hoped you could help me.

From what I have gathered, autistic people do not wish for there to be a cure for autism, which I understand because well, it would change your brain and the way you view the world. Some even insist it cannot exist (which I'm not so sure about but whatever). My main question is, there are thousands of people out there who are affected by some kinds of ASD so severe that they can never lead a proper life, will never mentally develop beyond a child, and often have to live through agonizing pain and overstimulation. When it comes to these cases, would they not prefer a cure? So wouldn't it be more ethical for a cure to exist, but taking the cure not be compulsory? Those people are obviously not on social media, so their voices go unheard. But wouldn't they and their loved ones not want them to be in pain?

Thanks in advance.

First off, here's why a "cure" is indeed impossible: autism is a neurotype, not a disease. It's not the brain or any organ/system doing something it shouldn't or being damaged by some internal and/or external factor. An autistic brain functions DIFFERENTLY, not DEFECTIVELY, though obviously there is a variety of ways in which it manifests, and it is very rare for an autistic person to be ONLY autistic, there's often one, or more, conditions affecting them at the same time (anxiety, ADHD, schizophrenia, depression, OCD, etc). It is also likely a result of multiple cromossomes working in atypical ways (unlike with Down Syndrome, which is a result of cromossome 21 and ONLY 21 working differently) - and we still don't know which ones, or even how many said cromossomes are.

What does all of that mean for a cure? It means that:

1 - To make an autistic person non-autistic it'd need to be possible to discover it when they're still a fetus and somehow force their brain and entire nervous system to form differently - both things modern science can't do and that we're not sure will EVER be possible.

2 - It is very likely that even if a cure is possible, it will NOT be a one-size-fits-all kind of deal, and it will work on some cases and be useless in others.

So it is already a far, far, FAR more complicated deal than just "If we put enough money, time and effort into it, we can find a cure." Part of the reason why many autistic people are sick of nearly every fucking charity about autism being focused on a cure is because, instead of that money going directly to us or to our caretakers (be it family or any form of hospice/home) and having a very real positive effective, that money goes into searching for a something that might genuinely not be biologically possible.

This is sadly the common history for nearly every group under the large umbrella of Disabled People. Sign Language was discouraged and even made ILLEGAL in some countries long before there were was a reliable, safe way to allow deaf people to hear. There are THOUSANDS of horror stories about people with any form of paralysis or mobility issues being just let root and die in their beds, even after all kinds of mobility aids were invented because "it's a burden to the caretakers" and a "miserable life to live anyway." A disabled athlete in Canada has recently complained about lack of accessibility and was offered EUTHANASIA as a solution because God forbid someone has to build a ramp.

The sad reality is that many non-disabled people are only interested in helping us if the help is guaranteed to make us 100% "normal." If it will gives us a decent, and sometimes fully/mostly independent life, but not make us able-bodied/neurotypical it is NEVER considerd "good enough", and is often talked about as a "set-back for the cure." Giving us ways to communicate our needs, find emotional support, employment, or at the very least multiple sources of aid that will allow our families to not be on "caretaker mode" 24/7 and to not fear what might happen to us once they pass away is considered A SET BACK. Because we're not "cured", but are also not dead.

They're focused on trying to "solve the mystery that will totally lead us to the cure IN THE FUTURE", but never on hearing our VERY basic requests for stuff that would greately improve our lives NOW - Autism Speaks, the largest autism "charity" (hate-group that literally uses "therapy" created by nazis to "help" us) literally popularized the myths that we don't know ANYTHING about autism, how it happens or how to help people with it, and making the "official autism symbol" be a fucking puzzle piece.

The "finding a cure is more important than anything" narrative talks over the needs of EVERY autistic person in existence, including the ones that cannot express their opinion or understand their own condition enough to HAVE an opinon, and yes, including the ones that actively WANT to be "cured."

And speaking of people who do genuinely want to be "cured" of their autism: it is extremely naive of you to think there's any change a cure wouldn't be made mandatory if it existed, and that the choice would be left to the individual, or even to a parent/caretaker on the more "extreme" cases.

Like I said before, things like Sign Language were made ILLEGAL in many countries for the crime of helping disabled have a better life without curing them. We still have cases of doctors operating deaf babies/toddlers without the parents consent. Wheelchair users constantly complain that people just randomly decide to "help" them by pushing their chair towards where they assume the person wants to go, without saying a word to them, without letting them change direction and sometimes even being careless enough to fuck up the chair.

Disabled people CONSTANTLY get called stupid or selfish for not opting for long, expensive treatments that will often only TEMPORARELY make them abled-bodied because being "normal/not a burden" should be more important than anything, including the completely unnecessary and often brutal emotional turmoil of getting used to a "normal" life just go then have to get used to being disabled again. And yes, autistic peoplel, from the completely indepent ones to the ones that need constant care, who have said they would NEVER take a cure for it if one existed, ALREADY get condescending, and sometimes openly hateful, comments about it all day, every day, everywhere. For saying we don't want to take the IMAGINARY pill that can "fix" us.

Our lives are already considered lesser, our opinions are already disregarded, and our bodily autonomy is already denied constantly (see the more "harmless" things like people that think it's funny to force hugs and kisses on those of us who hate most physical contact, to doctors that have injured or KILLED us through unnecessary, often violent means of restraining us during meltdowns). If a cure existed, we'd be straight up forced, or at least constantly pressured, to take it. There's a reason WE are the only ones discussing how unethical it'd be to force us to be "cured", while most neurptypicals have not even heard of that objection, and half would get mad at us for being "ungrateful" - after all, they spent so much time, money and effort on this thing (that we've been rejecting from day one), we can't just refuse it like that!

I know you probably mean well, anon, but the sad reality is that nearly every talk of "curing" autism (and almost anything that is considered a disability) is often rooted on nothing but society's very open disgust and disdain towards our very existence, not a genuine desire to make sure we're safe and happy - and as you can imagine, we're mad that we constantly have to justify our right to be alive and actually listened to, not spoken over by people who are "trying to help" by telling us to shut up and be glad that they're trying to make us "normal."

[lungfishpoem]

I won't google it rn because I'm lazy but how do we even decide what is a male and what is a female in different species? Like, it isn't just "this one gets pregnant" because of seahorses and such. And I don't think cromossomes work the same in every species. How does that work.

[wiki-identidades]

Intersexo

Intersexo ou intersex, que significa "sexo intermediário" ou "entre os sexos", é o grupo de todas as pessoas cujas características corpóreas relacionadas ao sistema reprodutor estão entre os dois extremos legitimados e normatizados (corporalidade de Sistema Reprodutor "Feminino" OU corporalidade de Sistema Reprodutor "Masculino").

São pessoas que nasceram naturalmente com anatomia, genética e/ou conjunto hormonal que não se encaixam facilmente nos padrões típicos de mulher cis ou de homem cis. São pessoas que nasceram naturalmente com: (1) genitais ambíguos, parciais, duplicados ou ausentes, (2) órgãos sexuais internos ambíguos, parciais, duplicados ou ausentes, (3) composição hormonal que difere dos padrões típicos, (4) variações genéticas e cromossomais que diferem dos padrões típicos e (5) caracteres sexuais secundários ambíguos.

Existem mais de 30 categorias diferentes de intersex; alguns exemplos mais comuns são: Insensibilidade Androgênica, Hiperplasia Adrenal Congênita, Variação de Klinefelter, Hipospádia, Variação de Turner, Variação de Swyer, Variação da 5-alfa-redutase, Variação de MRKH, Mosaicismo Cromossomal, Ovotestes, Virilização Induzida por Progestina, Variação de La Chapelle. A proporção de intersex varia muito conforme o tipo: pode ser uma proporção de 1 em 66 nascimentos ou até de 1 em 130,000 nascimentos. Intersexos sofrem as discriminações chamadas intersexofobia e diadismo.

As variações intersexo são formas naturais da biologia humana, porém são patologizadas e marginalizadas.

Pessoas intersexo não são consequentemente trans. Elas podem ser cis ou trans. Intersexo não se refere a gênero, refere-se somente à corporalidade (anatomia, genética e conjunto hormonal).

Links externos:

[raytyger]

Can we talk about how gender specification in language is dumb? Like, almost always.

The only theoretical usefulness would be to explain a person or animal gender, but just saying it afterwards should be enough.

I don't know someone's appearance nor personality based on their names. Why the "*.:';" should I know their gender?

And then there are several languages that use gender for things without gender. Why would a chair be female and the floor male? That's just non-sense.

turns out a bunch of legal code specifically refers to people as “he or she.” the implication being that as a nonbinary individual i am clearly ungoverned by law

[zsphoenix]

Good morning for you! I hope you have a great weekend! ♡

[ehud1564]

Blocklist from the notes of this post: https://gogh-save-the-bees.tumblr.com/post/184609013268/terfs-do-not-interact-banners-reblog-is-you

sakurapawprint

alive1999

sailorterf

terfvenus

gaymgrl

symphony-inblue

tra-nonsense

lilleisak

feral--bog--witch

somegirls-blog

searchingforproofsthatimwrong

cromossomes

yooterus

sappho-the-witch

mukuroikusaaba

selesbiangomez

assignedferalatbirth

terven-tea

sammyclassicyonicfan

witch-of-versailles

yonicgoddess

spookyterf

evil-wrongthink-lesbia

clito-ria

malehater

riotgirlboss

terfqueen-miku

radkanna-2

terfiewerfie

ms-gay-frogs

0----0----0----0    

[mionemymind]

I’m super waiting for Nat to be the first to apologise, first because I love her, second because she dont have a Y cromossome

What if she doesn't apologize? Just curious on how you would react

[vibranium-coochie]

Ok first of all kin. And in light of that new kinship. Idk anymore :/

We all know who Prudence’s mother actually was

[heroesarelife]

Replying and debate

@luzonmfjel asked:

Hey! About your quirk genetics post, it was a really interesting read on a topic I've been thinking a lot about too. Now all of my genetics qualifications come down to 9th grade biology so this probably doesn't make much sense, but I was wondering if it was possible that quirks were passed on like blood types, with multiple different alleles existing? Not about if you have/don't have a quirk, but more about what that quirk would be. For example, Todoroki. Say his dad’s genotype was Aa, and his mom’s was Bb. With A being fire and B being ice, of course. So put on a punnett square, the possible outcomes would be Ab, Ba, and AB. Ab would mean either a partial or full dominance of fire, Ba of ice. That would result either in someone having a quirk that’s entirely one, or mostly one, like Shouto’s siblings, and AB would be the half and half codominance that we see with him. Those are just the genotypes though, and the way that those genes would present themselves in phenotype could just vary. I'm sorry if that was less than coherent, just thought I'd offer my two cents. ^^ 

Hell yeah, debate debate. I love so much <3

Don’t fret at all, mate. Let’s see if I understood you right. Like as I see it, you said pretty much the same thing I did (?). It’s just that you chose to use different letters instead of only A’s. Using A’s was just a personal choice, not an avoidance of distinction between quirks. When I described Todoroki’s case... well here, let me just reiterate:

One way it could go is that if a child ends up being dominant homozygous (AA), then they should probably inherit “both” the quirks - and how those genes would express themselves is another point entirely. It could also happen (perhaps more rarely) with the child being heterozygous (Aa), in which one of the parent’s quirk is recessive homozygous (aa). So here are the options:

Mother: Aa

Father: Aa

Possibilities: AA (25%), Aa (50%), aa (25%)

Or:

Mother/father (vice versa): Aa, aa

Possibilities: Aa (50%), aa (50%)

In that description, for Todo’s case, the father “A” would mean Fire, and the mother “A” would mean Ice (or their aa would mean Fire/Ice on the second choice). The possibilities are the punnett square results of that. Besides that I fail to see what the argument here is, as it seems like a pretty good sum up of what I described on that meta. Like, what you said is exactly what I meant in it, so I do apologize if it wasn’t clear and made it sound like I was talking again about quirk vs no-quirk (the intention was to had moved on from the quirkless argument by this point of the meta). I tried not to say which was Todoroki’s genotype, because I wanted to leave it more open, and give more freedom for the whole thing (it had inferences and, in the end, it’s a fiction thing).

However, if you do want to get very realistic I reckon that the correct answer for Todoroki would be that he is an heterozygous (Aa). And the second option is the correct one for the parents. That’s because, as far as I know, Codominance is usually a trait observed on heterozygous. Whereas Partial Dominance is a trait usually observed in homozygous (AA/aa).

About the multiple alleles point (ABO blood type)... That’s not the direction I chose on my Meta, because I thought would make it a bit overcomplicated, and also because I didn’t think it likely that quirks have multiple alleles (which doesn’t mean is not the case). But determining factors for quirk inheritance can involve maybe more than one pair of chromosomes, as well.

I hope this helps, I mean, assuming that’s what you wanted to know. Let me know if you meant something else /o/

@masterlazywriter reblogged your post and added:

Hi! I want to say that I am a biology major and your genetics analyses are on point! I’m very surprise your include epigenetic at the end! :o cause I was thinking about epigenetic for a while while I read it. 

THANK YOU! Epigenetic has logic for this situation, doesn’t it? <3 so interesting.

@roquelg replied toy our post “Quirks and Genetics”:

Oh, I love your analysis. It is very well structured. Only one question, aizawa is able to neutralize the alpha factor (the ability to use a quirk) the bullets are the same or do they work also eliminating the quirk? ... Thanks for sharing your ideas 

Oh thank you, mate! I’m that glad you liked it! <3 took some time and effort, so this feedback makes me quite happy actually :3

I do need to disclaim that the logic I used for the meta regarding the quirk factor is the hugest leap I did, the largest inference, and it may very well be wrong (regarding the relationship between quirk, quirk factor, plus alpha. I mean, the explanation was confusing and it may be that these 3 terms are interchangeably talking about the same thing, for example. There are other hypothesis as well, but I needed to settle for one to move on with the rest of what I wanted to say).

So, Aizawa says that Erasure “doesn’t attack the quirk itself”, then proceeds to say that Plus Alpha is a mechanism added to a normal human body, and that the collection of these are called Quirk Factor. And then he says that Erasure halts the Quirk Factor. I took that to mean that he affected the response between the Plus Alpha and the Quirk. A friend interpreted it as a neurotransmitter inhibitor and I think that’s a pretty accurate metaphor to how Erasure seems to work. If my hypothesis is correct, that is.

The bullets are a whole other problem. So, in the beginning we are led to believe that they cause damage to the Quirk Factor. In Mirio’s case, a permanent one. However, we now know that Eri’s quirk is that of Rewind, not really the same thing as a quirk that erases quirks. It seems that the bullet formula is using Eri’s blood/quirk to attack specifically the Quirk Factor and Rewind only that part of the body. In theory, the same aspect can be rewinded back to before the person took the bullet. So I wouldn’t say that it’s the same as eliminating the quirk per se.

Applying my theory, it would seem that the bullets rewind the Plus Alpha mechanism to either a time in a person’s life before they developed enough to be able to use their quirks (4 years old in canon), OR to a time in evolution where the Plus Alpha did not exist yet (?). This is all highly hypothetical though, so have that in mind. I hope this answered your question XD let me know if it didn’t.

@sarahhaley101  replied to your post “Quirks and Genetics”:

This analysis is super good and thorough!! However I’m not sure that Todoroki’s quirks is the perfect example of typical codominance. It is not just his quirk that has two expressions — his hair color and eye color do as well, and these multiple alleles at different foci are split right down his center. He could be a chimera! So, he has two completely different sets of chromosomes, not just two alleles at one foci. Chimerism has never been recorded in humans to this degree, but this is anime so! 

Thank you so much, mate! <3 This means a lot, I’m very happy with the positive response *was lowkey expecting to receive hate* /o/

Well yeah, but codominance is an expression on different cromossomes and in fact hair colour can have a codominance expression (and todo hair seems to be that). All in all he’s all a codominance isn’t he? I would like to point out that  heterochromia is not a result of codominance though. So have that in mind. All in all it might as well be chimerism, so I can’t say you are wrong. I mean, this is an anime afterall. I just tried to bring real world genetics to the whole thing so talking about that didn’t even cross my mind, to be perfectly honest. It is a thing to consider, of course. Thanks for introducing the idea, mate :3

@bakushima-ima replied to your post “Quirks and Genetics”:

Wait Bakugou was born out of a quirk marriage??? Did I miss this in the manga????? 

Awesome analysis though, I love seeing people analyse the scientific side of bnha because it's so well thought out and planned 👍

Why, thank you <3 I’m really glad you enjoyed it, thank you kindly for letting me know! o/

It’s not stated anywhere in canon that Bakugou was born out of a Quirk Marriage. Like, I use the term quirk marriage just to mean the same as quirk fusion. In canon the term “quirk marriage” means a social behaviour in which people marry just so their offspring would have their quirk combined. The fandom has been using that word to also mean a “fused quirk”, so the quirk itself is married, say. It’s just a collective choice, really. So Bakugou’s quirk is a “marriage” between his parent’s quirks, but his parent’s marriage was not a result of a quirk marriage objective (as far as we know). Two different things, then, yeah?

I hope this was your question XD let me know if that was not the case and I misunderstood :3

[scarlet-blues]

“I’m not ‘glitched’, i was just born with a couple of problematic cromossomes...”

[hello-nichya-here]

Why is the topic of curing disabilities/mental illnesses so controversial?

Simple: the conversation often excludes the very people that would suposedly benefit from said cures, and whenever we point out some pretty serious flaws in most people's ideas of how a "cure" for these conditions would work, we get yelled at and called ungrateful and/or stupid.

For exemple, plenty of organizations (like Autism Speaks) are always going on and on about how everyone needs to work together to find a cure for autism. Unfortunately, they do that while:

1 - Ignoring that pretty much any serious research into autism shows that it CAN'T be "cured" since it would need to AT THE VERY LEAST completely alter a person's nervous system (not just the brain, but every single nerve too), and that is sort of fucking impossible.

2 - Ignoring that autism is a genetic condition, and likely comes from anomalies in multiple cromossomes. Instead, they focus on stupid shit like soy milk, or vaccines, or something the mother did while pregnant supposedly causing it - things that have been proven false decades ago. Not only does that result in a HUGE waste of money, it often spreads misinformation about the condition (and does some serious damage, like a ton of diseases that had been previously erraticated coming back because of the anti-vax movement).

3 - Ignoring that plenty of autistic people DON'T WANT A FUCKING CURE. If you offered me a miracle cure for my anxiety, I'd take it, because this illness brought me literally nothing good ever. If you offered me a cure for my autism, I'd instantly reject it. Now, if I could get rid of just a few traits (like the sensory issues and meltdowns), I would accept it, but only if I was sure it would be JUST these traits that bring me difficulties, not stuff like hyperfocus or not liking it when people I don't know get too touchy with me.

4 - Trying to "cure" autistic people things like ABA "therapy", that was literally invented by the same guy who created gay conversion therapy and said that autistic people are not human, andwas proven time and time again to give patients PTSD + to not actually "cure" them, just make them mask their traits as much as possible, which led to many patients getting depressed and suicidal.

Now, you might be thinking "Okay, a cure for autism is a lost, pointless cause, but what about other stuff, like a blind person getting surgery so they will be able to see?"

That might sound much easier to do, but it can often be just as complicated. For some people, it would be just a few quick surgeries and then it's done, they can see for the rest of their life.

But say someone is blind because an accident that really damaged their eyes, to the point that, sure, maybe the surgery would be a complete, life-long success - or only help for a few years, then they'd be blind again, assuming it worked at all. And in some other cases, the possibility of complete, lasting success is just out question.

Is it that hard to imagine that some people would not want to risk the disappointment of it not working at all , or only working at first, then they'd end up blind again, forcing them go to the entire process of getting used to it once more after it was supposedly already over?

On that same kind of situation, there's also stuff like people getting MANY super complicated, super expensive surgeries that they'd take a long time to recover from and could have mixed results, like say someone who had a serious spinal injury - sometimes they'll be able to walk by themselves, other times they'll need a cane, and other times they'll need a wheelchair.

That kind of stuff can be a brutal process that would be very stressful, and once again, super expensive, and one could easily decide it's just not worth it, and just stick to being on a wheelchair all the time.

Since I mentioned money, that is unfortunately a factor many people ignore in pretty much anything related to medicine - if it is so expensive that basically nobody can afford it, then it might as well not exist.

There's also the problem of people spending all their time focusing on trying to find some miracle cure, and completely neglecting to do basic stuff that would assure disabled people would have a good life regardless. I lost count of how many "inclusive and accepting" schools I've seen (including the one I went to for most of school-life) or even HUGE hospitals that don't bother to have a fucking ramp or doors whide enough that would allow someone in a wheelchair to enter the room. Couldn't at least some of the budget from governments and charities go to that?

And to end the money talk, there's also the fact that some disabled/mentally ill people DO have money. So much money in fact, that they can just deal with life with barely any struggles, since there's a ton of people and resources they can turn to. Not that hard to imagine why they aren't spending every second of every day dreaming of a way to be cured.

And on that same vein, there's also situations like people who were born blind or deaf and plenty of them don't really want to be "cured" because... well, they might know other people's lives are different from theirs because of their disability, but they never really experienced the world in any other way, so what someone else could see as a tragedy or at the very least a really radical change in their own life is just some mundane shit to them. And even people who became disabled later in life can sort of go through the same if they are used to it and don't really see a point in trying to fix something that, if they're lucky enough to have proper support, isn't really a problem to them anymore.

Basically this topic could be way less of a mess, and more importantly way less condescending/ableist, if the goal was on helping each individual in whatever way would work best of them, instead of just lumping all the disabled and mentally ill into the same "tragic" group that can ONLY ever be "helped" by becoming "normal" so the rest of the world doesn't have to deal with the fact that some people are different and *gasp* that doesn't have to be the end of the fucking world.

[searchingforproofsthatimwrong]

Haven't you Heard ? Bioligists are the one studying cromossomes

TERF: Trans women aren't women because they weren't born with a uterus! It'S BaSiC BioLogY.

Actual bioligist: The binary is a construct. Gender is a construct. Leave trans women alone.

TERFS: *conveniently hear nothing*

[veterinaria16]

Formas das bactérias: Cocos, bacilos, espirilos, vibriões e cocobacilos

São seres procariontes e unicelulares, não possuem retículo endoplasmático

Estruturas essenciais: Componentes com qual a bactéria não consegue viver sem, encontrado em bactérias não patogênicas e nas mais agressivas

Estruturas facultativas: Promovem características para a bactéria, a tornando mais agressiva ou mais resistente, só nas patogênicas

Parede celular: Ajuda na ligação da bactéria aos tecidos do hospedeiro, além de protege-lá, composição gram + ou gram - 

Membrana citoplasmática: Regula a entrada e saída de substâncias, responsável pela síntese de ATP, presente nas gram + e gram - 

Citoplasma: Local onde estão diversos componentes e onde as reações químicas acontecem

Ribossomos: Faz a síntese de proteínas

Mesossomos: Ajuda na divisão bacteriana, separa a bactéria em dois e dps suas enzimas a clivam no meio

Grânulos de energia: Reservas de ATP para serem usadas durante momentos de dificuldade

Nucleóide: Onde fica localizado o DNA cromossomal

Flagelos: Proteínas que promovem movimentação em ambientes líquidos para facilitação de uma invasão num hospedeiro ou na circulação do tecido do animal

Pili bacteriano: Proteínas que facilitam a passagem de pequenos pedaços de DNA para outras bactérias

Fímbrias: Promove adesão nos tecidos do hospedeiro facilitando a colonização

Cápsula: Recobre a bactéria tornando-a mais difícil de ser detectada e fagocitada, bactérias com cápsula são consideradas mais violentas

Plasmídeo: Pequenos fragmentos de DNA, carrega informações genéticas

Esporo bacteriano: A própria bactéria mas em condições desfavoráveis, ela sofre transformação, diminuí seu tamanho e metabolismo, forma camadas de proteção que a tornam mais resistente

Multiplicação: Necessário presença de muitas bactérias, elas fazem divisão binária

1) Estímulo: Condições nutricionais e ambientais favoráveis

2) Aumento de volume celular: Aumenta seu tamanho para poder se dividir

3) Separação das estruturas: Metade das bactérias ficam de um lado e metade fica em outro pros mesossomos poderem fazer a separação

4) Separação das duas bactérias: Ela se divide em duas geneticamente iguais

Tempo de geração: Tempo necessário para as bactérias duplicarem as suas células, quanto mais rápido se duplicam mais difícil pro sistema imune combatê-las

Curva de crescimento bacteriano: Replicação e morte da bactéria num ambiente novo

1) Fase lag: Momento de adaptação no novo ambiente, verificação se o ambiente fornece as condições necessárias para a sobrevivência dela

2) Fase log: Inicia o processo de multiplicação aumentando seu número

3) Fase estacionária máxima: Quando ela para de se multiplicar, pode ser por causa do esgotamento de nutrientes ou pelo acumulo de substâncias tóxicas liberadas por elas mesmas 

4) Fase de morte: As bactérias começam a morrer devido ao ambiente que começou a se tornar desfavoráveis, as substâncias liberadas por elas podem ser utilizadas por outros, e caso a bactéria não se esporule todas irão morrer

[legalblogue4-blog]

Estalagem De Sites

Você quer estudar igualmente minúcia associados revisão, saiba mais neste local É essencial lembrar que qualquer bebê é único. revisão É uma nova versão do já publicado ICSI (Injeção Intracitoplasmática do Espermatozoide), técnica esta que vem sendo utilizada desde 1992 e indicada para casais com infertilidade masculina como, por ex, baixa quantidade de espermatozoides ou homens com vasectomia. Por mais que haja estresse durante esse processo de desligamento e ocorram diversas mudanças na rotina, é fundamental que a família entenda que a separação não afetará paixão e relacionamento entre pais e filhos sentimento de culpa dos pais com a decisão pode ser um extensa vilão, e é preciso ter em mente que tentar sustentar um conúbio apenas pelos filhos deve fazer com que a menino cresça com um modelo equivocado de família e paixão. SANDELOWSKI (1993) ainda nos relata que a gestação depois infertilidade para as mulheres envolvidas em inversões na transição normal para a maternidade, oscilar para na frente de e para trás entre as identidades como ainda inférteis e como finalmente grávidas. Para engravidar de moçoila ideal manter relações 2 dias de antemão ou 1 dia depois do dia mais fértil, isso porque os espermatozoides com cromossomal é manter relações 1,mo XX são mas lentos, mas também mas resistentes para permanecer aguardando” em útero pela chegada do óvulo. Este post me chamou muita atençao, não costumo comentar nenhum, espero que com meu glosa vc reflita e quem sabe no futuro pense em ter mais filhos, porque ser mãe é a maior donativo que Deus deu a nós mulheres, é com certeza a maior e melhor realização na vida de uma senhora. Ideal é estrear 3 meses antes de tentar engravidar e continuar a ingestão durante todo primeiro trimestre da prenhez 2 Se sua dieta for saudável, você já obtém parte do ácido fólico necessário de alimentos como cereais fortificados no café da manhã, feijão, verduras e suco de laranja, mas ainda é essencial tomar os suplementos, porque é bastante difícil conseguir toda a quantidade necessária de ácido fólico somente com a dieta. Belsky (1981 apud SILVA et al, 2008) observa que, por ser a família ambiente imediato de contatos da criança, contexto das relações pai e mãe e pais-criança funciona como indicações que influenciarão os futuros destinos e papéis do tipo na sociedade. Minha bebê possui 2 meses e não consigo com que ela faça está pega profunda… Além de não furar muito a boca, ela sente ânsia toda vez que abocanha parte extensa do mamilo… Aí ela vai forçando a carola pra escorregar a boca e permanecer com uma parte menor só peito na boca.

[mirai9]

tumblr user cromossomes, let's make up, i apologize for calling u crusty and i forgive you for boasting about your vagina in the tags we can leave it all behind us 🥰

deleted the t/erf stuff cuz honestly it’s just not the kind of thing i want on this blog like the amount of just grody crusty people reblogging that one is just annoying like i don’t want to attract a bunch of people who dedicate their entire online life to arguing on tumblr it’s kind of just sad, the minute i posted it terf discourse blogs responded it’s like they’re just sitting here scouring the terf tag sniffing out anyone who mentions them i literally have 30 followers