#countries where surrogacy is legal

[surrogacycare]

How the UK, Argentina and Colombia serves as perfect destination for same sex surrogacy?

The concept of same sex surrogacy is different across various parts of the world. While few rules out the possibility of any same sex surrogacy procedure, others have regulated this practice. Let's plunge into how same-sex surrogacy is practiced in three nations: the United Kingdom (UK), Argentina, and Colombia, investigating the legal systems, types, and considerations unique to each.

How Surrogacy for gay couples in UK works ?

The practice of surrogacy within the UK is more or less same like other parts of the world. Moreover, Surrogacy for gay couples in UK is legal but intensely regulated. Also, the law only allows for altruistic surrogacy, where the surrogate mother can only be compensated for medical costs. This applies similarly to hetero and same-sex couples. The key challenge for same-sex couples, particularly for male couples, is finding a surrogate, as commercial surrogacy agencies are not allowed to function here.

Legal system in UK

The legal system is slightly tricky in UK. That said, the legal guardians of the child at birth are the surrogate mother and, in case that she is married or in a civil relationship, her life partner or partner, unless they did not assent to the surrogacy program. Same-sex couples must apply for a parental order to get legal parenthood of the child born through surrogacy. Also, this process can commence after the child's birth and must be done within six months.

How the process goes on?

The crucial component here is the functioning of the surrogacy process. That said, same-sex couples regularly connect in with surrogacy through informal courses of action or through non-commercial surrogacy agencies that help match intended parents with surrogates. Also, the method includes legal understandings, in spite of the fact that these are not enforceable by UK law. After the child's birth, the same-sex couple applies for a parental order to exchange legal parenthood from the surrogate (and her spouse/partner in case appropriate) to themselves.

Surrogacy in Argentina for Same-Sex Couples

Surrogacy for same sex in Argentina functions quite differently. Moreover, the country is known for its dynamic position on LGBTQ+ rights, being the first nation in Latin America to legalize same-sex marriage in 2010. Surrogacy, be that as it may, works in a legal gray area; it's not unequivocally directed by law, but it's not disallowed either. This uncertainty permits same-sex couples to seek after surrogacy courses of action, regularly with the assistance of legal experts to explore the complexities.

Legal system in Argentina

Since there are no particular surrogacy laws in Argentina, the method depends intensely on the agreements made between the intended parents and the surrogate. Also, the need of direction implies that there's a noteworthy agreement on trust and legal contracts outlined to ensure the rights and duties of all parties included.

The functioning of the process

Surrogacy for same-sex in Argentina more often than not starts with counseling with a lawyer who specializes in reproductive rights and family law. These experts offer assistance in drafting agreements and exploring the surrogate's pregnancy and birth aspects. After the child is born, same-sex partners regularly ought to go through adoptions procedures to set up legal parenthood, in spite of the fact that this could change depending on the states inside Argentina.

Surrogacy for same sex in Colombia

A country like Colombia is surely a haven for all the same sex couples looking for same sex surrogacy. That said, Colombia stands out in Latin America for its favorable approach to LGBTQ+ rights and surrogacy. Moreover, surrogacy has been legal since 1988, and recent legal progressions have made the nation an appealing destination for same-sex couples looking to begin a family through surrogacy.

The functioning of the legal system

Colombian law permits for altruistic surrogacy, where the surrogate may only be compensated for medical and pregnancy-related costs. At the same time, commercial surrogacy isn't allowed. For same-sex couples, particularly male couples, the method to set up legal parenthood is clear compared to numerous other countries. The intended guardians can be pronounced the legal guardians before the child's birth, eliminating the need for adoption procedure post-birth.

On the other side, the process around surrogacy for same sex in Colombia includes making a surrogacy agreement with the help of legal professional to guarantee all parties' rights are ensured. That said, medical strategies for conception are carried out in fertility clinics that are acclimated to working with same-sex couples. Once the surrogate is pregnant, intended parents can begin the legal process to be recognized as the child’s guardians, making the post-birth process smoother.

Final words

If you are an intended parent looking for a hassle free experience regarding same sex surrogacy, these three countries could come as a great choice. Yet, the surrogacy journey within the UK, Argentina, and Colombia offers its own rewards and even the challenges. Moreover, each nation has its interesting legal system and process, but the basic guideline is the same: the urge to create a family. That said, with the right planning, legal process, and support, same-sex couples can explore these ways toward satisfying their dream of parenthood.

Source: https://surrogacycare.blogspot.com/2024/04/how-uk-argentina-and-colombia-serves-as.html

[giucomix]

I care about immigration law as much as anyone else, I care about citizenship law slightly more than average, and I care about surrogacy law way more than normal because I am petty

[gaiafertility]

How Legal Fees Drive Up the Cost of Surrogacy: A Country-by-Country Analysis

For many, surrogacy is a life-changing path with great possibilities for their parenthood journey. Yet, cost comes as a significant factor in the same journey. Although the most widely discussed costs are medical bills and surrogate compensation, legal fees silently account for a large portion of the surrogacy cost. That said, different nations have their unique legal systems controlling surrogacy, which can significantly affect the overall cost. Let’s examine how legal fees affect surrogacy cost in Greece, Colombia, the UK, and other nations, thereby separating the elements causing these increases in cost.

Knowledge about Legal Frameworks around Surrogacy

From those nations that forbid surrogacy completely to those with well-established, supporting legal systems, surrogacy laws differ greatly between countries. Legal surrogacy somewhere usually requires intended parents to negotiate a sequence of legal processes to safeguard the surrogate’s rights as well as their own. Legal fees here involve contracts, court orders, and parental rights, all of which can rapidly mount up.

Surrogacy in Greece: A Clearly Legal Route Not Without Cost

Thanks to its supportive and clear legal system, Greece has grown to be a preferred destination for surrogacy. That said, many overseas intended parents find surrogacy appealing as Greek legislation lets both residents and foreigners seek it. Though Greece provides a rather simple legal route, legal fees nevertheless play a major role in the surrogacy cost in Greece.

Before the embryo transfer may take place in Greece, the court has to approve the surrogacy arrangement. The intended parents of this legal process must pay a lawyer, turn in paperwork, and show up before courts. Though usually seamless, there is surrogacy cost in Greece involved in the process. The complexity of the case will determine whether these legal expenses run €3,000 or €6,000. Although at first look this might not appear excessive, it increases the whole surrogacy budget by adding to other expenses including agency fees, medical bills, and the surrogate mother cost in Greece.

Colombia: Affordable Surrogacy with some legality

Especially for international parents, Colombia is becoming a more reasonably priced surrogacy destination. The somewhat low medical and surrogate compensation rates are one of the main causes of the cheaper surrogacy cost in Colombia. The country’s surrogacy laws are less clear-cut, though, and legal questions might raise the general cost.

United Kingdom: High Legal Fees in a Strictly Regulated System

Among Europe’s strictest surrogacy laws are those in the United Kingdom. Although surrogacy is legal, the procedure is strictly controlled to forbid commercial surrogacy. Intended parents cannot pay the surrogate more than rehired expenditures, which helps to keep the surrogacy cost in UK under control on first glance. Legal fees, though, can greatly raise the overall cost.

Getting a parental order—which passes legal parenthood from the surrogate to the intending parents—is one of the primary legal obstacles in the UK. Legal counsel, court visits, and lots of paperwork are all part of this procedure. Depending on how simple or complex the matter is, legal surrogacy cost in UK may run from £5,000 to £15,000. Although the surrogate cannot benefit from the arrangement, the legal expenses nevertheless make the surrogacy cost in the UK somewhat costly compared to certain other nations.

Surrogacy Around the World: Variations in Legal Costs

Beyond Greece, Colombia, and the UK, several nations have their own particular legal obstacles that might greatly affect surrogacy expenses:

USA

Known for some of the most favorable surrogacy rules for intended parents, the United States also boasts among the highest legal fees. Legal fees by themselves can surpass $15,000 in areas like California, where surrogacy is strictly controlled and established. The U.S. is among the most costly countries for surrogacy given the already high medical and surrogate pay expenses.

Ukraine

Ukraine is a reasonably priced country with well defined surrogacy laws. But the war has complicated things, and the risk and difficulties of doing surrogacy domestically are driving legal bills up.

Canada

Like the UK, Canada just permits altruistic surrogacy, so surrogates cannot be paid more than what is appropriate. Legal expenses can still mount, though, particularly in relation to contract drafting and proving parental rights following birth.

What Causes increase in  Legal Fees?

Legal fees in surrogacy involve far more than just contract drafting; they also cover:

Protection of the intending parents as well as the surrogate depends on a strong legal contract. This covers everything from dispute settlement to surrogate pay and medical treatment.

Many nations have court orders requiring approval of the surrogacy agreement. Sometimes intended parents could have to show up in court several times, which increases legal costs.

Establishing parental rights upon birth is a vital (and expensive) step in nations like the UK. Though there is no genetic link, the surrogate stays the legal parent for the child without a legal system.

Particularly with regard to returning the child to the intended parents’ native country, international surrogacy sometimes entails further legal complications. Extra legal work can result from immigration laws, citizenship questions, and passport applications.

Final words

Although many people have the opportunity to fulfill their dreams of parenthood through surrogacy, the legal aspect of things might cause somewhat higher surrogacy cost. Whether you are thinking about surrogacy cost in the UK, Colombia, Greece, or Cyprus, it is important to know how legal fees will impact your whole expenditure.

[surrogacyconsultancy]

What are the future prospects of Surrogacy in France?

Surrogacy has always stayed as a lesser discussed topic across many parts of the world. While these countries may not permit any kind of surrogacy services, one still needs to stay updated and informed. Also, knowing the laws in their country is essential for many who want to use surrogacy to start or expand their families. The situation is especially complicated regarding surrogacy for couples in France. Let's examine the possibilities for surrogacy in France by simplifying the specifics.

The role of surrogacy laws in France

There are many complications in regards to the legal system in this part of the world. Also, it's critical to understand that France forbids the practice of gestational surrogacy. This ban stems from French law, which places a high value on the idea that human bodies shouldn't be sold. The French legal system is set up to safeguard the security, freedom, and dignity of surrogate mothers and the offspring born via surrogacy clinic in France. Therefore, under French law, surrogacy contracts of any kind—commercial or altruistic—are not recognized, and entering into one within the nation may result in legal ramifications.

People going overseas to achieve parenthood

With no clear laws regarding surrogacy, many people in the country choose to go overseas. Still, there are administrative and legal obstacles associated with this choice, particularly when it comes to the child's citizenship and legal status during surrogacy for gay couples in France. On the other hand, there are certain favorable conditions in the same regard as well. France has made progress in recent years in acknowledging the parent-child bond for children born via international surrogacy. Also, children born abroad through surrogacy are entitled to French citizenship and legal recognition of their parentage, according to rulings made by French courts. This means that even though surrogacy is still prohibited in France, the government recognizes the legal right to a relationship between the child born through surrogacy and their French parents.

What makes surrogacy related laws so complicated?

The complications around the surrogacy laws further add into the crisis situation regarding surrogacy for couples in France. There are various steps involved in obtaining legal recognition of parentage for children born via surrogacy overseas. Intended parents frequently need the help of legal professionals to navigate the complicated legal system. To establish legal parenthood in France, they might have to go through adoption procedures or other legal processes. Although the procedure can be time-consuming, expensive, and emotionally draining, it is an essential step in guaranteeing the child's legal rights and eligibility for French citizenship.

Importance of social and cultural aspects

France is very specific regarding its social and cultural ethics during surrogacy via surrogacy clinic in France. In addition to being a legal concern, surrogacy is a hotly debated ethical and social topic in France. Also, surrogacy opponents contend that surrogacy exploits and commodifies the bodies of women, especially in nations where surrogacy laws are less stringent. They also bring up issues with surrogate mothers' and kids' rights and welfare. This attracts further debates from the other side of the country. Moreover, proponents contend that everyone has a right to a family life and that surrogacy may be able to assist people and couples who are unable to conceive naturally. They support the creation of a morally and legally sound framework that would permit surrogacy in France while enforcing stringent rules to safeguard all parties.

Is there any hope for a change ?

It’s better to stay hopeful and positive regarding the future of the surrogacy for couples in France. Also, there has been a shift in France's surrogacy laws, especially with regard to the rights of children born abroad via surrogacy. That being said, the nation's basic ban on surrogacy has not altered. Legal frameworks and societal attitudes would need to change significantly for surrogacy to be legalized in France. On the other side, there are continuous discussions regarding key aspects like surrogacy cost in France. Lawmakers, legal scholars, and the general public are currently debating whether or not surrogacy laws in France should be implemented in the future. Any move toward legalization would probably be accompanied by strict guidelines to address moral issues, guarantee surrogate mothers' safety, and protect children's rights and welfare. At the same time, we can stay hopeful with the legal system of the country. That said, the French legal system currently in place encourages people who are thinking about surrogacy to explore other options. International and domestic adoption is still viable options for beginning a family. With its own set of rules and requirements for eligibility, France also provides a variety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to individuals and couples dealing with infertility concerns.

Final words

France has a lot to cover in regards to the changes in their approach towards the surrogacy via surrogacy clinic in France. For French individuals and couples who aspire to become parents, surrogacy offers a difficult route. Although surrogacy is illegal in the nation, recognizing the rights of children born via international surrogacy agreements is a crucial first step in recognizing the various ways in which families can be formed. For those in France considering surrogacy, the path to parenthood entails negotiating a complex web of ethical, legal, and psychological issues.

Source: https://surrogacyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2024/04/05/what-are-the-future-prospects-of-surrogacy-in-france/

[someone-will-remember-us]

Elton John and David Furnish have done it, and so have Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian and Kanye West.

There’s a bloke from Essex who recently joined the club via an undisclosed overseas location and a 72-year-old Scotsman has just been recognised as the legitimate owner of an American one he bought back in 2020.

What we are talking about here is surrogacy: the incubation and effective purchase of babies after the careful selection of their component parts.

The global market – already worth almost $18 billion (£14 billion) – is projected to rise to $129bn by 2032, according to the research firm Global Market Insights, with anywhere between 5,000 and 20,000 babies incubated to order annually.

This covers the whole caboodle in which you can DIY things with a friend at one extreme, or go for the full Lamborghini treatment where, in some countries, an agent will help you shop around the globe for the finest sperm, eggs and wombs money can buy.

For those opting for the international pick and mix route, there are BOGOF deals (two implants for the price of one), the option of sex selection and a pay-as-you-go plan.

And that’s because you, the customer, are always right. As one agency, New Life Conceptual Limited, based in Lagos, Nigeria puts it: “…it takes four ingredients to make a baby: an egg, a sperm, a womb to grow in, and a family to go home to. You have the last ingredient, but you need a place for your baby to grow, and that’s why you’re here.”

Some companies even offer legal guarantees around defective foetuses that have to be aborted.

If you think I’m making this up, think again.

In the UK, where commercial surrogacy is banned but international imports are not, there are now between 400 and 500 new surrogate-incubated babies registered each year, while globally the business is more than doubling in value every two years.

Some call it a “miracle” and point to the invisible hand of the market creating a profitable multi-billion dollar industry in which everyone wins; a benign system of supply and demand the libertarian economist Leonard Read might have called I, Baby.

And while there is no suggestion that the multi-millionaire celebrities who have used surrogacy, like Elton John and the Kardashians, have exploited the surrogate mothers who bore their children, for others – including feminists like myself – the global surrogacy trade reeks of false entitlement.

It has been sanitised by the liberal “rights” agenda and the same self-serving logic that brands prostitutes “sex workers”. If it brings to mind a book or essay, it is Brave New World, Aldous Huxley’s dystopian novel about social engineering and evil hiding in plain sight.

To what extent, for example, is the lack of regulation around surrogacy driving impoverished women into unsafe and unconsented arrangements, as it once did so extensively with domestic and international adoption?

And what do we really know of all those hundreds of Brits now shopping for children around the world.

Can it really be right that you can effectively buy a baby overseas but raise it in Britain where commercial surrogacy is supposed to be banned?

Just as in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s, when we thought of adoption as a favour to unsuitable mums whether they be “wayward” teens or impoverished Mexicans, surrogacy is being sanitised.

Delve into the subject on the Internet and you will find that almost everywhere you look, it’s celebrated. These babies, magicked into welcoming arms, are seemingly a modern miracle for childless couples of every stripe. TikTok is full of it.

Here in Blighty, we have only “ethical surrogacy”, says Surrogacy UK, a leading non-profit “providing a safe, supportive environment for surrogates, intended parents and families”.

Such organisations emphasise the benefits to infertile couples, and the “great gift” bestowed by women (aged 16 or older) who are happy to “altruistically” lend their womb to another for nine months.

Whilst such arrangements do work for some, there is no reliable data on what is really going on in the UK. This is because the sector is governed by a bizarre mish-mash of statute and common law, and because regulation, where it exists at all, is opaque.

Echoing the words of a Tarantino script, surrogacy is legal in the UK but not a hundred per cent legal.

It’s legal to enter into an agreement with a surrogate, it’s legal to pay her “reasonable expenses”, and, if you’re the owner of a womb, it’s legal to grow a child (made with your eggs or someone else’s) and give it away once it’s born.

But it’s illegal to advertise you are looking for a surrogate in the UK or solicit for business if you want to become a surrogate. It’s also an offence to arrange or negotiate a surrogacy arrangement as a “commercial enterprise”, but that doesn’t really matter because, get this: “reasonable expenses” can stretch beyond the average annual wage.

If money is still an obstacle, you can always rent a womb from a woman in a country like California, Cyprus or Greece where for-profit surrogacy is legal, before bringing the child back home to the UK.

Another oddity of the UK system is that, while it is a criminal offence to advertise surrogacy services, there are “some exemptions for not-for-profit organisations”. It is not clear how these agencies are selected but they are organisations that officials at the Department of Health and Social Care deem trustworthy. It is how agencies like Surrogacy UK and Brilliant Beginnings are able to proactively recruit and advertise a willing pool of surrogates in Britain.

“All our surrogates benefit from being a part of our thriving community and can enjoy a range of events and gifts along the way,” says the Brilliant Beginnings website. “Surrogate retreats” and “milestone gifts” such as chocolates, flowers and even bellybuds - speakers that allow mothers to play music to babies in the womb - are all part of the service.

Brilliant Beginnings says “expenses” payments to surrogate mothers in the UK typically range between £12,000 to £35,000. It is not known how well off the typical UK surrogate is in relation to the intended parents check, but there is potentially a stark economic divide.

“For surrogates who receive means-tested state benefits, it is important to be clear about whether benefits might be affected by any expenses received,” says the Best Beginnings website. “We would always recommend surrogates are upfront with their benefits office”.

Evidence for the benefits and harms of surrogacy in the UK are almost entirely anecdotal.

Disputes do occur but no one really knows their frequency or what they entail because they are heard in the secretive Family Court, which sits mainly in private and from which detailed reporting is banned.

An obvious problem in the UK, is that the flash point for disputes typically arises after the fact - that is, after a child has been born. This is the point at which the intended parents (or parent) must apply to the Court for a “transfer of legal parenthood” and, in most cases, will be the first time the state even becomes cognisant of the surrogacy arrangement.

An application for such a transfer can only be made with the surrogate’s consent but the decision hinges on what the Court considers to be in the best interests of the child, not the surrogate mother.

“The parental order process takes place after birth and involves the family court, and a court-appointed social worker,” says the DHSC website. “This provides a valuable safeguard for the best interests of the child”.

There is a growing recognition that the regulation of surrogacy in the UK is inadequate but the agencies who run it want legislative reforms that favour the would-be parents rather than the surrogate mothers.

They are especially exercised about the fact that written agreements between surrogates and intended parents are ultimately unenforceable in the UK courts.

Others, including myself, want the practice banned – as it is in many countries across the world. Miriam Cates, the former Conservative MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, caused a storm in January when she said surrogacy was “just ethically not acceptable”.

“Of course adults have a strong desire to be parents, both men or women. Of course it’s a sadness if that’s unfulfilled for whatever reason – they can’t conceive, don’t have a partner, whatever it is.

“But to deliberately bring a child into the world in order to separate it from its mother at birth I think is just ethically not acceptable,” she said.

Alan White, chairman of Surrogacy UK, told a webinar hosted by the Royal College of Midwives in February that those of us who see the practice as unethical and exploitative were limiting choice and free will because we failed to properly understand the motivations of surrogate mothers.

“Surrogates don’t see themselves as mothers, they see themselves as extreme baby-sitters,” he said. “[They are] doing that wonderful thing of doing the part of having children women or gay men can’t do for themselves”.

To survive the psychological impact of giving away a child, there is little doubt that this sort of thinking helps.

As Helen Gibson, the founder of Surrogacy Concern points out, surrogates are encouraged to see themselves as a bystander – just the “the oven” or “the microwave”, as some describe themselves.

But this sort of psychological dissociation doesn’t always work, and perhaps seldom does.

I spoke to one UK woman who feels deep regret at her decision to enter into a surrogacy arrangement. Sandra, whose name I’ve changed, was 32 with two children of her own. She had escaped a violent husband, and was struggling to make ends meet.

A friend suggested she could make money by carrying a baby for an infertile couple. And, after approaching a UK agency she found via Facebook, she was told that in return for having the baby, she could enjoy “unlimited expenses, within reason”.

She was introduced to a gay male couple who wanted her to carry an implanted embryo, engineered with selected eggs to give them the best chance of a “tall, blonde child”. Sandra, by contrast, is short and dark.

The embryo transfer failed three times, and the IVF process made Sandra extremely sick. Eventually, the couple decided to go to California, but not before admonishing her for wasting “their time, and a lot of money.”

“I felt like a broodmare,” she told me.

If the UK surrogacy market is a classic British muddle, the global market is the wild west.  

And because no UK Court or Home Office official can possibly check the provenance of all the elements that go to make up a child (the sperm, the eggs, the IVF, or, crucially, the free agency of the surrogate mother), anything goes for the unscrupulous.

Although most countries around the world still ban the practice, there are more than enough who don’t.

In Greece and various US states including California, Washington DC and Arkansas, commercial surrogacy is fully legal. In many other countries it is either unregulated or very lightly regulated, enabling the trade to flourish. Countries in this bracket include Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Argentina, Guatemala, Iran, Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines, Russia and Ukraine.

WFI Surrogacy, one of America’s biggest providers, offers its customers what it calls a “live birth guarantee” – the promise that a birth will occur once the process is underway.

“The high quality of our egg donors and surrogate mothers enables us to make this type of guarantee”, says WFI. “Our live birth guarantee programs are available for either: singleton or twins [or] one specimen source or two specimen sources”.

“All our surrogate mothers are medically and psychologically screened,” it adds.

This is Big Fertility, whose business model relies on the commodification of every aspect of pregnancy.

A healthy overall budget for a Brit using the US surrogacy route sits between £250,000 to £320,000, according to the UK agency Brilliant Beginnings.

Often freelance agents or “fixers” will shop around the world for their clients to increase choice and reduce costs. A surrogate mum in Los Angeles, California costs a whole lot more than one from rural Mexico, for example.

Denmark has long been prized for its sperm, its tall blond donors making the most of their viking heritage.

For eggs, there are also options galore – and all pushed with a good dose of fairy tale genetics.

Egg Donor number “241222_01” on the World Center of Baby website (motto: every person deserves to be a parent) conforms precisely to the modern notion of female beauty as defined by Instagram.

Weighing in at just 66kg, she’s also “an artistic soul with a flair for creativity”. If you would prefer a sporty one, just go for donor number 241222_02 – “an athletic enthusiast, deeply engaged in fitness and sports”.

Embryos can be made up from the customers chosen eggs and sperm in any number of IVF labs around the world. They are then frozen and shipped to wherever the chosen surrogate may be. Fixers facilitate the entire process, including the negotiation of complex legal agreements and the careful arbitrage of international and domestic laws and regulations.

The wording of commercial surrogacy contracts is telling, the text reflecting the economic disparity between carrier and client.

“If Gestational Carrier suffers a loss of her uterus as a result of the performance of her obligations under this Agreement, she shall receive $5,000.00 from Intended Parents”, stipulates one contract.

It continues: “If Intended Parents jointly request Gestational Carrier to terminate the pregnancy because of the Child’s medical condition(s), she will do so promptly. If Gestational Carrier refuses to terminate, Gestational Carrier will have materially breached this Agreement and Intended Parents’ obligations under this Agreement shall cease immediately”.

Natalia Gamble, a director at Brilliant Beginnings, says the agency made an active decision “to only facilitate people going to places that we felt were ethical, secure, and safe”.

Although Ms Gamble is adamant that her approach is ethical, she helps clients go to Nigeria, Cyprus, and Ukraine, where commercial surrogacy flourishes.

“We made the active decision at Brilliant Beginnings to only facilitate people going to places that we felt were ethical, secure, and safe – we have very much focused on the US, but through our law firm (NGA Law) we have helped people go into places like Nigeria, Cyprus, and Ukraine because our role is much more not to help them do it in the first place but to help them bring their children home and resolve all the legalities afterwards,” she said.

Northern Cyprus even allows sex selection, with several clinics there advertising the service on their websites.

“The cases that are happening in Nigeria or Cyprus where it’s very unregulated and there’s no legal framework are a very, very small percentage of the overall international surrogacy landscape,” she said.

“We do need to be very alert to the risks of exploitation and those risks are greatest in places where there is no legal framework regulating how surrogacy is run [...] but, it’s about not overinflating those risks when the majority of people are going to what you might call ‘good surrogacy destinations’.”

Ms Gamble is pushing for a change to UK law that would grant commissioning parent(s) legal rights to the child (embryo) at the point of conception.

“It’s in the best interest of the child,” she says. “If you speak to any surrogate mother they will say ‘Look, I am not the mother of this child, I’m always very clear that it’s someone else’s child that I’m carrying’ – no one wants the surrogate mother on the birth certificate, including her.”

But is that really true – are surrogate mothers really so detached?

I spoke to Liane, who said her own experience of surrogacy caused “a huge amount of grief and hurt”.

She described the market as being infected with a sort of “toxic positivity”.

She added: “It’s painted as a wonderful thing to do, a beautiful selfless act which can only bring joy when for me, I felt used, manipulated, and devastated”.

Ms Gibson of Surrogacy Concern says cases involving “coercion and regret” are not uncommon, even within the UK’s surrogacy model.

“Surrogacy prioritises the wants of the adults ahead of the needs of the child, and creates a societal sense of entitlement towards women’s bodies,” she said.

The practices of single men buying children abroad, white couples using black surrogate mothers, and the growing trend towards using cut price surrogacy destinations such as Mexico, Colombia, Kenya and Ghana are all on Surrogacy Concern’s radar.

Physical harms to surrogate mothers are real. Carrying a baby always involves serious risk but, for surrogates, those risks are often greatly magnified.

Linda Khan, an epidemiologist based in the departments of Paediatrics and Population Health at NYU, says surrogates run an “increased risks of all kinds of pregnancy complications, which lead to adverse outcomes for women and children”.

One factor, she says, is that the embryo is not biologically related to the woman and implanted via IVF. Another is that “many women are carrying multiples because it’s so expensive. They want two for the price of one”.

“Twinning is not safe, even when it occurs naturally. It is a huge burden on women’s bodies, it gets all the risks of complications sky-rocketing.”

Whilst it would be difficult (though not impossible) to ban or abolish surrogacy entirely – changing laws to ban the ‘womb traffickers’ as many campaigners refer to the brokers, should be a priority.

The marketing of surrogacy should also be made subject to tougher regulation, say some experts, although many others favour a blanket ban.

“Surrogacy is a trade that makes commodities of children, of embryos and of eggs, and reduces women to being seen as machines,” said Ms Gibson. “It should not masquerade as a progressive solution to the problem of infertility.”

Further, any legal protections introduced in the UK should be for the benefit of the surrogate mothers giving birth and the babies, rather than for the commissioning parents or agents, adds Ms Gibson. A commissioning parent should never have a legal right to remove a baby if a woman has changed her mind.

In March last year, experts from 75 countries signed the Casablanca Declaration, which calls for a global ban on all forms of surrogacy. And in April this year, an international conference was held in Rome with an aim to provide all States with a legal instrument banning the practice of surrogate motherhood.

Implicit within it is a rejection of the fanciful and dangerous notion that anyone, anywhere has an inalienable right to a child.

“The regulations of each country are not enough to stop human trafficking globally,” said Bernard Garcia Larrain, the Executive Director of the Casablanca Declaration for the Universal Abolition of Surrogacy.

“We need an international treaty to prohibit surrogacy because this is a global market that moves a lot of money and knows no borders,” he added.

[djuvlipen]

But as surrogate mothering is normalized, it is crucial to highlight the classist and racist premises on which it is founded and its destructive consequences for the children thus produced and for women. A worrisome one is the presence of a number of “suspended children,” who, having been denied, for various reasons, legal certification in the countries where the “intended” parents reside, or having been born with disabilities, are rejected by both the surrogate mother and the commissioning couple. A Reuters investigative report has also found that through the internet adoptive parents, at least in the US, can dispose of children adopted abroad, without any difficulty, through a practice called “private rehoming” that is totally unregulated. Even more worrisome is the evidence that some surrogate children are channeled to the organs market, for once the transaction has taken place no institutional oversight checks what happens to the children marketed this way, who in most cases are taken to other regions, thousands of miles away from the place of their birth. ... While defenders portray it as a humanitarian gesture, a gift of life enabling couples who cannot have children to experience the joys of parenting, the fact is that it is women from the poorest regions of the world who generally take on this task, and surrogacy would not exist except for the monetary compensations it fetches. Quite properly, then, in “Surrogates and Outcast Mothers: Racism and Reproductive Politics in the Nineties” (1993), Angela Davis has argued that surrogacy is continuous with the breeding practices that were enforced on the American slave plantations, with poor women in both cases being destined to forfeit their children, once born, for the profit of the rich.

-- Silvia Federici, "Surrogate Motherhood: A Gift of Life or Maternity Denied?" in Beyond the Periphery of the Skin

[coochiequeens]

Another country where 43.5% of the population lives in poverty is becoming popular with surrogacy agencies

"International Appeal: Understanding Why Families Globally Choose Surrogacy in Mexico

The international appeal of surrogacy in Mexico is rooted in several key factors. First, Mexico’s robust healthcare system, renowned for its high-quality medical services, has made it a primary choice for surrogacy.

Second, the country’s inclusive culture and open acceptance of diverse families provide a welcoming environment for all prospective parents. Lastly, the competitive costs of surrogacy services in Mexico have made it an attractive option for many families worldwide.

Mexico’s legislation around surrogacy is another significant factor contributing to its international appeal. Although certain states have more specific regulations, the country as a whole provides a legal framework that facilitates the surrogacy process. This provides reassurance to prospective parents, making Mexico a safe and viable choice for surrogacy.

The international appeal of surrogacy in Mexico also extends to the country’s geographical location. For North American and European families, Mexico’s proximity offers easy travel for appointments, legal proceedings, and the eventual birth of their child. This geographical convenience coupled with the country’s advanced healthcare infrastructure makes Mexico a prime destination for surrogacy."

Wow that sounds awesome for families experiencing Infertility. I wonder if there be other reasons couples are looking to Mexico?

"t was not all good news. The agency also reported that extreme poverty — defined as people who do not have enough income even to buy enough food — edged up from 7% of the population in 2018 to 7.1% in 2022. Because of the increase in overall population, that meant that extreme poverty cases rose from 8.7 million people in 2018 to 9.1 million in 2022."

[yuri-for-businesswomen]

genuinely curious because im new here, what do you mean by leftists wanting women to be a public resource?

this means advocating for things like paid surrogacy and sexual services where its essentially the female body that is being sold. so instead of women being a resource (for sex and childbearing) to her husband, she is available (for sale) to the public, which is what most modern/western leftists support. usually they argue since all labour under capitalism is coerced, that means any paid „service“ makes the exploited woman a worker who needs worker protection and rights. even though according to their own logic, since the sex/pregnancy is coerced (under financial duress in a capitalist society), its abuse. the law recognises this too until it comes to the sex industry.

for example, in my country germany, the left leaning center parties successfully pushed for the liberalisation of prostitution (womens „right“ to sell our bodies/mens right to buy us) over 20 years ago while abortion is still technically illegal (albeit decriminalised) and up until recently, gynaecologists were fined and even imprisoned for saying they do abortions on their website. surrogacy is not legal here, but wealthy couples just go to eastern european countries like ukraine to exploit impoverished women for it, because of course they do. of course they are more liberal but leftists consider surrogacy and sexual acts labour which makes the (female) body a resource, a means of production even. as far as i know marx was against prostitution so this is kind of ironic.

did this help? anyone feel free to add or correct me.

[ramithetradfem]

My prolife stance

1. If the mothers live is in danger and the baby is not viable out of the womb

If the baby is not viable then if the mom dies then the baby will die too. However, if the baby is viable then the baby should be removed and the mother should be treated.

2. If the child would not survive birth due to extreme defects

There are many defects that cause immense pain or extreme struggle for a child. Such as if they can't breathe properly, can't eat, don't have normal brain function. In these cases it's understandable that a parent would not want their child to suffer.

3. Babies conceived from assault are physical evidence of the act.

Getting rid of them only makes the case harder to prove especially with minors. I believe the woman should put them up for adoption if they do not wish to keep them and if they abort then refer to point 8

4. I'm completely against gamete donation and surrogacy and IVF.

Too many cases have come up where people are getting with their own siblings because of gamete donation. Everyone should have the right to know where they came from and many of these places don't want to give up the information of the people that donated the gametes. If someone wants to know who their biological mother is, then they should be allowed to. And with IVF many babies are needlessly aborted because they want to create as many eggs as possible. There's no point in having all of your other babies die just to produce one. It would be better to adopt. As for surrogacy It's completely and utterly not for the child. They don't care about mother and child bonds or about infant trauma. You wouldn't separate a puppy from their mother at birth yet you would separate a human being from their mother at birth and no one sees the problem with this. That baby doesn't know the surrogate isn't their "mother" yet she is the one that they look for when they are born. She is the one that they want and to remove her from that is so cruel to that child.

5. People should be allowed to get sterilized if they want

If someone wants to get sterilized then they should be allowed to. Just as with any other surgery they need to sign whatever paperwork that they need to do to show that this is the decision that they make and they need to stand on that decision. Once a person is a legal adult in their country then they should be allowed to sterilize themselves if they want to. If they regret it then that's on them.

6. Infant adoption should only occur if there are no biological family members that can take them in.

Infants adoption is already traumatic especially when many of these parents take the babies away as soon as they're born in the hospital, these children need their family members and if it's possible to have them go with family it's better for them to do that. Let's not add the fact that many of these families who are looking for babies are extremely manipulative, especially during covid, when many of them were angry that mothers were actually able to provide for their children and thus kept their babies.

7. Birth control and protection should be accessible

Banning birth control would not help mothers keep their babies. We should focus less on trying to stop people from not having children and more on promoting and helping families, especially mothers from preconception to postpartum. If someone does not wish to have children then that's fine, they should be taking the proper steps to not create a baby.

8. Deceased babies should be treated with respect regardless of if their mothers wanted them or not

If in the end a child has to be aborted then that should be treated with respect. They are not medical waste. They are not science experiments. They are babies. They are human beings and should be respected as such. They deserve to be cremated and at least have a small service for them. If you can't do that, then at least give a moment of silence. Small cremation urns like in the photo, or maybe a memorial plaque with each baby's name that can be added. They were not just a clump of cells, they were another human being and if you're going to end their life, at least respect them.

“I knew you before I formed you in your mother’s womb. Before you were born I set you apart and appointed you as my prophet to the nations.” Jeremiah 1:5

[theroyalsims]

BREAKING: EMPEROR KENJI AND EMPRESS ALEXANDRA NEW MUM AND DAD TO SURPRISE TWINS!

Months after their much-awaited wedding, Their Imperial Majesties The Emperor and Empress of Shang Simla have announced the arrival of their newborn babies!

The completely unprecedented news was shared via the official website of the Imperial Family, along with a brand new photo of the Emperor and Empress and their twin baby boys. The announcement is translated below:

“May the gods be kind upon us! 

Their Imperial Majesties The Emperor and Empress are delighted to share the safe arrival of their children, Prince Seoji and Prince Soobin. 

The royal twins were delivered yesterday via a surrogate, and the birth was witnessed by Their Imperial Majesties, and conducted under the supervision of the royal physicians at the medical wing of the Grand Palace.”

Interestingly, up until last year, surrogacy was not recognised in Shang Simla. However, a landmark legislation which deemed surrogacy “legal” was recently passed, in the hopes of giving equal rights and opportunities for couples or persons unable to get pregnant naturally, to become parents. Before said law was passed, surrogacy was banned in the conservative country, and children born via surrogacy were deemed illegitimate.

This supposedly happy announcement is already being met with controversy, even within the walls of the Imperial court. The use of the title “Prince” have raised quite a few eyebrows. The circumstance is currently without precedent, as the royal twins hold the unique distinction of being the first two members of the Imperial Family born via surrogacy. 

Another area complicated by the twins�� birth is the line of succession. Shang Simla follows agnatic primogeniture, where only male heirs may inherit. Because of this, the current heir presumptive to the throne is the Emperor’s nephew, Prince Akira. Will the arrival of Princes Seoji and Soobin shake up the line of succession? As children born within a valid marriage, but through a surrogate, will they even be allowed to inherit the throne?

We’re betting we’ll be hearing a lot more about these two little bundles of joy soon!

[avo-kat]

"In conjunction with its crackdown on the rights of same-sex parents, the Italian government has begun retroactively stripping same-sex parents of their legal connection to their children.

Michela Leidi told the Daily Mail that she “cried for ten days” after receiving a letter informing her she would be removed from her daughter’s birth certificate. “It was as if I did not exist.”

Liedi and her wife Viola are reportedly one of the first three lesbian couples to have their children’s birth certificates changed after the country’s right-wing government announced in March that state agencies should no longer register the children of same-sex couples.

[...]

While same-sex civil unions have been legal in the country since 2016, same-sex couples do not have the right to adopt, thanks in part to opposition from the Catholic Church. Surrogacy remains illegal in Italy and there are restrictions that prevent the adoption of “stepchildren” by one parent. Medically assisted reproduction, like in vitro fertilization (IVF), is only available to heterosexual couples.

Viola became pregnant through artificial insemination, and the couple had to travel to Spain to receive the treatment.

Until March, there were several Italian cities where same-sex couples could be listed as “parents”—as opposed to “mother” and “father”—on birth registrations. But the Interior Ministry began sending letters ordering an end to the practice. 

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, leader of the far-right Brothers of Italy party, made anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric a cornerstone of her campaign for office. She opposes allowing same-sex couples to adopt as well as marriage quality, calling civil union “good enough” for LGBTQ+ couples.

“Yes to the natural family, no to LGBT lobbies,” she declared last summer.

Under current Italian law, the member of a same-sex couple who is not legally recognized as a child’s parent could lose custody if the legally recognized parent dies or the relationship ends."

holy FUCKING shit!?

[cassiopeiacorvus]

Washington State Surrogacy Laws

So... The Billionaire's Baby is, uh, it's not good. Yeah, that about sums it up. I've decided to get pedantic about it just for fun. I need something to distract me from the sad excuse of a romance plot that this book is currently selling. In the United States, each state has its own surrogacy laws (because to paraphrase another Tumblr post we are fifty countries in a trench coat pretending to be one) and I was curious to see how closely TBB followed the laws of Washington state. The answer is not really.

The list of surrogacy requirements for Washington state (RCW 26.26A.705):

Have attained twenty-one years of age;

🟡 Unclear. We don't know how old she is yet, but she could very easily be 21 or older.

Previously have given birth to at least one child but not enter into more than two surrogacy agreements that result in the birth of children;

🔴 MC hasn't had a child, but she hasn't entered into a surrogacy agreement before either.

Complete a medical evaluation related to the surrogacy arrangement by a licensed medical doctor;

🟢 That's been mentioned.

Complete a mental health consultation by a licensed mental health professional;

🔴 Not been mentioned.

Have independent legal representation of her choice throughout the surrogacy arrangement regarding the terms of the surrogacy agreement and the potential legal consequences of the agreement.

🔴 No one's mentioned the law or legal representation at all.

The expectations for the intended parent(s):

Have attained twenty-one years of age;

🟢 Very likely that Callie/Cole and Daphne are over 21.

Complete a medical evaluation related to the surrogacy arrangement by a licensed medical doctor;

🟡If Callie is your love interest, they have a medical issue preventing them from carrying a child and if Cole is your love interest, it's Daphne who has the medical issue. We don't know if the evaluation where they learned that information was related to the surrogacy agreement.

Complete a mental health consultation by a licensed mental health professional;

🔴 A mental health evaluation hasn't currently been mentioned.

Have independent legal representation of the intended parent's choice throughout the surrogacy arrangement regarding the terms of the surrogacy agreement and the potential legal consequences of the agreement.

🔴 Again, legal representation hasn't been brought up at all, which considering how detailed Daphne has been about the situation, is unusual.

The requirements of the surrogacy agreement. (26.26A.710):

At least one party must be a resident of this state or, if no party is a resident of this state, at least one medical evaluation or procedure or mental health consultation under the agreement must occur in this state.

🟢 The MC, Callie/Cole, and Daphne all live in Seattle.

A woman acting as a surrogate and each intended parent must meet the requirements of RCW 26.26A.705.

🔴 Ha ha ha. No. They don't.

Each intended parent, the woman acting as a surrogate, and the spouse of the woman acting as a surrogate, if any, must be parties to the agreement.

🔴 We've not heard anything about the agreement.

The agreement must be in a record signed by each party listed in subsection (3) of this section.

🔴 Second verse, same as the first.

The woman acting as a surrogate and each intended parent must acknowledge in a record receipt of a copy of the agreement.

🔴 Third verse, same as the first.

The signature of each party to the agreement must be attested by a notarial officer or witnessed.

🔴 You get it by now.

The woman acting as a surrogate and the intended parent or parents must have independent legal representation throughout the surrogacy arrangement regarding the terms of the surrogacy agreement and the potential legal consequences of the agreement, and each counsel must be identified in the surrogacy agreement.

🔴 No one's mentioned their lawyers as of yet.

The intended parent or parents must pay for independent legal representation for the woman acting as a surrogate.

🔴 Again, no legal representation has been mentioned, but Callie/Cole is a billionaire and Daphne is a supermodel. They're already giving the MC room and board and a stipend, so this will not be a problem for them.

The agreement must be executed before a medical procedure occurs related to the surrogacy agreement, other than the medical evaluation and mental health consultation required by RCW 26.26A.705.

🔴 The MC's already been implanted by chapter two so that's a no go.

This is where we currently stand. If anything changes in the upcoming chapters, I'll update this post.

[surrogacyconsultancy]

Surrogacy Laws across the globe: Why having the right knowledge is important?

There is no doubt about the fact that Surrogacy laws play a crucial role in regulating and governing the practice of surrogacy. That said, surrogacy laws vary on country to country basis around the world. So, you need to carefully investigate and analyze these laws before putting a step further.

Why having a knowledge about Surrogacy laws matters?

Legal Protection: Surrogacy laws provide legal protection and clarity for all parties involved in the surrogacy process, including the intended parents, the surrogate mother, and the child. Moreover, these laws define the rights and responsibilities of each party, ensuring that their interests are safeguarded.

Enforceable Agreements: Surrogacy laws of country allow for the creation of legally enforceable agreements between the intended parents and the surrogate mother. Besides, these agreements outline the terms and conditions of the surrogacy arrangement, including financial compensation, medical procedures, and parental rights.

Parental Rights and Recognition: these laws determine the legal parental rights of the intended parents, ensuring that they can establish their legal relationship with the child born through surrogacy. Additionally, these laws provide a framework for the transfer of parental rights from the surrogate mother to the intended parents.

Ethical Considerations: Surrogacy laws address ethical considerations surrounding surrogacy, such as the protection of the surrogate mother’s rights and well-being, the prevention of exploitation, and the welfare of the child. Also, they set standards and guidelines for the ethical practice of surrogacy.

Conflict Resolution: These laws provide a framework for resolving potential disputes or conflicts that may arise during or after the surrogacy process. Moreover, they outline the legal procedures for handling disagreements and offer avenues for mediation or legal recourse if necessary.

International Surrogacy: Surrogacy laws also play a crucial role in international surrogacy, where intended parents and surrogate mothers may be from different countries. That said, these laws govern the legal aspects of cross-border surrogacy arrangements, including immigration, citizenship, and the recognition of parental rights.Intended parents must know that surrogacy laws vary significantly from country to country, and even within regions of a country. Hence, understanding and adhering to these laws is essential for ensuring a legally secure and ethical surrogacy journey. Moreover, it is advisable to consult with legal professionals or surrogacy agencies with expertise in the specific jurisdiction to navigate the legal complexities and ensure compliance with the relevant laws.

Surrogacy laws across the globe!

Surrogacy laws in Germany

Here are some key points regarding surrogacy laws in Germany:

Prohibition of Surrogacy: Surrogacy, both commercial and altruistic, is not legally permitted in Germany. Besides, the law prohibits the provision, undertaking, or mediation of surrogacy services.

Parental Rights: Under German law, the woman who gives birth is considered the legal mother of the child, regardless of any genetic connection. Also, the surrogate mother and her spouse or partner, if she has one, is legally recognized as the child’s parents.

Surrogacy laws in Colombia

Colombia has a legal framework that allows for surrogacy under certain conditions. Moreover, the country permits both altruistic and commercial surrogacy arrangements, with regulations in place to protect the rights and interests of all parties involved.

Surrogacy Regulation: Surrogacy in Colombia is regulated by Law 1788 of 2016, which sets out the legal framework for surrogacy arrangements.

Requirements for Intended Parents: To pursue surrogacy in Colombia, intended parents must meet specific requirements. That said, they must be Colombian citizens or legal residents, be of legal age, have a medical indication for surrogacy, and demonstrate their ability to provide for the child’s well-being.

Altruistic and Commercial Surrogacy: Surrogacy laws in Colombia allow both altruistic and commercial surrogacy arrangements. Besides, altruistic surrogacy involves the surrogate mother receiving only reimbursement for medical and pregnancy-related expenses. Also, commercial surrogacy allows for additional compensation to the surrogate mother.

Surrogacy Agreements: Surrogacy agreements in Colombia must be approved by a family court. That said, the agreement outlines the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of the parties involved and ensures the protection of the child’s best interests.

Parental Rights: After the birth of the child, intended parents must go through a legal process to establish their parental rights. Besides, this typically involves obtaining a judicial declaration of filiation or adoption.

Surrogacy laws in Greece

Greece has established clear and comprehensive laws to regulate surrogacy. The country permits both altruistic and commercial surrogacy arrangements, providing a legal framework that safeguards the rights and interests of all parties involved.

While looking at the following points, you can have a clearer understanding regarding surrogacy laws in Greece:

·  Surrogacy in Greece is regulated by Law 3305/2005, which sets out the legal requirements and procedures for surrogacy arrangements.

·   Greece allows both traditional surrogacy (where the surrogate uses her own eggs) and gestational surrogacy (where the surrogate carries an embryo not genetically related to her).

·   Intended parents must meet specific requirements to pursue surrogacy in Greece. Moreover, they must be a heterosexual couple or a single woman, have a medical indication for surrogacy, and be under a certain age limit.

·   A written surrogacy agreement is required between the intended parents and the surrogate mother, outlining the rights, obligations, and financial aspects of the arrangement. Also, the agreement must be approved by a family court.

·   Following the birth of the child, the intended parents must apply to a family court for a judgment establishing their parental rights. The court decision transfers legal parenthood from the surrogate mother to the intended parents.

·   On the other hand,  Greece allows international surrogacy, meaning that foreign intended parents can pursue surrogacy arrangements within the country.

Surrogacy Laws in Italy

·   Surrogacy Laws in Italy prohibits all forms of surrogacy, including both traditional and gestational surrogacy, with the intention of protecting the dignity of women and the family unit.

·   The Italian Civil Code states that any agreement that aims to transfer the custody of a child from the birth mother to another person is void and against public policy.

·   Engaging in surrogacy arrangements, either within Italy or abroad, can have legal consequences in Italy. Moreover, Intended parents who enter into surrogacy agreements may face legal challenges in establishing their parental rights.

·  Under Surrogacy Laws in Italy, those involved in surrogacy arrangements, including intended parents and surrogate mothers, can face criminal penalties and administrative fines.

Final words

As mentioned earlier, Surrogacy laws vary from one country to another. Hence we would advise you to consult with a professional legal expert or a surrogacy agency before initiating your surrogacy journey.

Source: https://surrogacyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2023/06/08/surrogacy-laws-across-the-globe-why-having-the-right-knowledge-is-important/

[phoenixyfriend]

SW Masterlist: In the Big Leagues

Navigation Post

Fun fact, tumblr allows 250 links on the old editor and 100 in the new. So. Network of masterlists

This post is for tumblr posts I've made that are specifically about one fic or another that made it onto AO3, including those that were previously on the Wider AUs masterlist.

Order:

One-offs

Sandstorm Verse (Flip the Hourglass)

Anakin and the Jedi Babies

Dimension Hopping to an Omegaverse (Bare Your Teeth, Soldier)

Commander Buir (This is Where the Story Starts)

Rex and Anakin Raise a Family

Fake Spontaneous Training Bond

Uncle Ben and Little Luke (Journey to the Center of the Galaxy)

Fake Sith TCW

Obi-Wan Declares Himself Dad-Shaped

TCW Leverage AU

ObiSabe AU (When the Bodyguards Hook Up)

Sticky Fingers AU

The Sexbot AU (Human Pleasure Droid)

Tread Upon the Wind

King, Soldier, Spy

Weapon Women

Parole Officer Fulcrum

System’s Scourge

Legally Horny

Jango Breaks Into Satine’s House

Fake Affair to Cover Up the Real Affair

Fett vs. Kamino Fertility Clinic and Sperm Bank

One-offs

A Candle in the Night - Anakin/Luminara (original)

Crossover between my Lumakin and Windwalker fics - Pt 2

The Way to a Boy's Heart is Through Violent Defensive Measures - Rex has difficulty with whiny AotC-flavor Anakin, a terrible flirt

Not Quite as Clever as a Fox - "I would kill for you.” “Great, here’s a list.”

Fett vs. Kamino Fertility Clinic and Sperm Bank - How this fic even happened, original post

In Which Anakin's Soulmate is a Lot Like Him, But More, and Worse - Adding some Pantress

Alert! Hot Young Single Dads in YOUR Area! - Street names are puns

Anakin Gets Pregnant and Causes a Scandal in Defense of the Jedi - Obi-Wan is just barely alien enough to have mating cycles (original)

Well, That's Not According to Plan - Rexanidala ft. pregnant transmasc Anakin (original)

General Kenobi and the Twins - General Kenobi and the Twins (original)

[redacted] - Hypnosis vs meditation

Amicable Anidala Divorce - Anidala Amicable Divorce (ft. whiny gay Anakin and “I can fix her” Padme/Ventress)

-

Sandstorm Verse: (chrono) (AO3) Anakin, Ahsoka, and Rex time-travel to pre-TPM Tatooine, Anakin and Rex have to be fake married for Ahsoka's safety

Base Post

Fake Marriage Shenanigans

Wouldn't It Be Easier

Various Thoughts on Anakin Needing Therapy

Interaction exploration: - Dooku - Maul - Maul&Soka - Shmi - Anakin&Anakin - Mace

-

Anakin and the Jedi Babies: (chrono) (AO3)

* Anakin and the Jedi Babies

AatJB Addendum - whatever the fuck this was

* Jango Meets Soka (1.5k words)

* Names and Faces (6.5k words)

* Anakin, Shmi, and the Jedi Babies (3k words)

* Anakin and the Jedi Babies: Knightmares (1.6k words) - Ben just really loves banthas

* Anakin Introduces his Jedi Babies (and Himself) (5.8k words)

Winds of Change

The Conspiracy (of Anakin and his Jedi Babies)

JangoShmi and Jedi-Mando relations - Shmi finds out

Cultural comparison of Jedi/Mando/Tatooine

How doth yonder baby brain work

Ylliben Skywalker (hair and tattoos) - various related thoughts - * A Child’s Ink - Hi there’s art now! It’s by the amazing @shukruut - This is the outline btw

And this is the outline of the whole ‘verse (so far)

Pronunciation of names

The Kidnapping of Pre Vizsla

* Where There’s a Whill, There’s a Windu (2k words)

From when I was writing Child’s Ink - The same - Ibid. - New subplot

Why is Anakin not aging?

A specific fanart I plan to commission

I forgot Depa has a sister orz

-

Dimension Hopping to an Omegaverse: (nsfw) (Chrono) (AO3)

Base Post

Surrogacy, Worldbuilding, Obi-Mom

How to Build an Army - The Clone Risk

Soap Operas

Tatooine (2.2k words)

Meet the Generals

Interior Design

Country Dyke

“Assigning” Dynamics

Rexwalker Nonsenses

No Way Home

Warfare 101

Quinlan and the Interdimensional Ingenues (except not really)

Random thought about Omegaverse pregnancies

The Spikes Thing (nsfw, noncon mention, body horror)

Gland Guards

“Weren’t you dead?”

Padme’s marriage to someone who is not Anakin

Churning his brain like butter

Chandrila, Mon Mothma’s pronouns

-

Commander Buir: (chrono) (AO3) An excuse to let Cody be dad-shaped

Initial Brainstorming

Worldbuilding for the AU

Cody & Shmi Talk About General Kenobi

Qui-Gon Jinn enables Skybaby crimes

The Jango Incident - Just some age stuff

Rexsoka and the Quinlan thing

New Mandalore

Cody deserves to be petty

-

Rex and Anakin Raise a Family: (Chrono) (AO3)

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

TPM Era

-

Fake Spontaneous Training Bond: (chrono) (AO3)

Original post

gay

overbearing dad

undercover

various musings

Discussion of Fulcrum’s skills (see notes)

-

Uncle Ben and Little Luke: (chrono) (AO3)

Uncle Ben and Little Luke (3k words, basically a fic)

Auntie ‘Soka and Little Leia (and Rex) (25k words)

Thoughts on “Auntie Soka and Little Leia” (jokingly, a director’s cut)

Rex, Pint-Sized Battlemaster

Twins, meet TCW plots

Planned continuations

Why not Han+Vader

The process of writing Auntie Soka - Addendum

“Luke rolls his eyes”

Headcanon meme

Ben pins the dilf radar

-

Fake Sith TCW Trio: (chrono)

Fake Sith TCW Trio (7.5k words)

Thoughts, and perhaps feelings

Padawan Kenobi puts up with a lot

Writing this was a JOURNEY

GRITTY?

Why did I set this in Space!1930s NYC

Plotting the route from Rattatak to Tatooine

-

Obi-Wan Declares Himself Dad-Shaped: (chrono) (AO3)

Obi-Wan Declares Himself Dad-Shaped

More of “Obi-Wan Declares Himself Dad-Shaped”

“Game’s over you son of a bitch! Tell me where she is!”

Requested Headcanons

-

TCW Leverage AU: (chrono) (AO3)

TCW Leverage AU

The bit with Korkie

The Family Tree is… a Disaster (ficlet)

Family Tree charted out (with excerpts)

1970s Dooku/Sifo-Dyas by @uraaniuum

-

ObiSabe AU (AO3)

ObiSabe

Palpatine

Face Blindness among clones

-

Sticky Fingers AU (AO3)

Hondo Saves the Galaxy

Anakin the Distraction

Manipulating Anakain

-

The Sexbot AU: (chrono) (AO3)

The Sexbot AU

Rex and Boytoy Anakin

Pregnancy

Writing process jokes

Not a slowburn, but a raging inferno someone’s aiming a fire extinguisher at

Poor Quinlan

Wanna Smash

-

Tread Upon the Wind (and Chase the Sky)

Mace and Fives

Jaster’s opinion on swearing

Adventures in AO3 Tagging

Does this count as a Freedom Trail

Qui-Gon and Feemor

The King, the Soldier, and the Spy

Original version: The King, the Soldier, and the Spy

Writing the Intro

Time-travel or a break with reality?

Alas, poor Satine

Not Very Nice to Ahsoka 

Weapon Women in a Galaxy Far, Far Away

WandaVision/SW Prequels (original brainstorm)

Widows on Kamino (original brainstorm)

Reader response to Anakin getting a civics lesson in Witch’s Favor

Parole Officer Fulcrum Steals Three Million Babies

Ahsoka Steals Three Million Babies

Ahsoka with baby clone Glitch (art by @amikoroyaiart, commissioned work)

Ahsoka is Anakin’s Parole Officer

Systems' Scourge

Systems’ Scourge (original)

Addendum

Ahsoka’s helmet in time-travel AUs

Legally Horny

Legally Horny AU (original)

Fox and Padme need to talk about the politics before you guys can Bang

Reactions to Jango Breaks Into Satine’s House (And Criticizes Her Security)

the weird S*ltcoats thing

Using the fic as shorthand with discourse

Fake Affair (To Hide the Real Affair

Fake Affair to Cover Up the Real Affair (original)

Sexy Addendum, feat. baby twins folllowup

Shiny Rainbow Knife

Transfemme Anakin (original)

Shipping Musings

Fett vs. Kamino Fertility Clinic and Sperm Bank

Kamino Sperm Bank (original)

An additional Fertility Clinic joke, now with lawsuits

Modern AU Hardcase’s deadname

[vro0m-but-not-cars]

how's switzerland in regards to trans people and/or poc? asking for a friend

Switzerland is a traditional right wing country, with a rising far right ideology especially in the youth like everywhere else. Our majority party is a right wing party. They are super duper fucking anti immigration racists. It's extremely hard to emigrate here, extremely hard to find a job when you're not Swiss, and extremely hard to become Swiss. The easiest way is by far to marry a Swiss.

Something you have to understand about European racism though is that it's less about your skin color (although yes very much about your skin color) and more about being an immigrant in the first place, where you come from, and especially how much money you have. A black American with an american passport will get by better at least on the institutional level than a black person from any African country. Islamophobia is widespread and rampant, and your supermarket cashier isn't allowed to wear her headscarf at work but we are oh so happy about Saudi princes living in our hotels, hiding their money in our banks, and buying our watches. Poor white eastern Europeans are treated worse here than rich POCs.

Now how life is for POCs and queer people also depends immensely on where you live, granted that there's a level of racism and queerphobia everywhere anyway. Urban areas are way way chiller than rural areas, obviously. (Once my train had an issue and I had to change trains in a small town's station about 30 minutes away from the capital. I went down the stairs to change platforms and the entire length of the underground tunnel I had to walk through was painted with a gigantic DEATH TO LGBT graffiti). The Swiss Germans are by far more right wing than the French speaking Swiss and Italian speaking Swiss although the Ticinesi are also very anti immigration, because it's the poorer area of Switzerland and they get a lot of Italians immigrants. But of course you'll still get by easier in Swiss german second most expensive city in the world Zürich than in Sion, despite Sion being the French speaking largest city of the mountainous canton of Valais.

There are discrimination laws in place but they are barely enforced. You can change your gender but there's no nonbinary option. POCs get killed by the police here as well (justice for Mike, Lamin, Nzoy, Hervé, we don't forget). A large proportion of the population is still opposed to same sex adoption although it is legal. I just read this morning that a law we voted on in 2021 and that makes it illegal to hide your face in public and was purposefully created against muslim women wearing the burqa will start being enforced next year. Surrogacy is illegal so if no one in your relationship has a uterus you can't have biological children. Every time they ask the population about their acceptance of queer people the numbers go down, especially in young people. We vote on making it even harder to emigrate it about once every two years and the results are always very very close. The president of the majority right wing party called urban leftists "parasites" during his national day speech. The other day, one of our seven ministers publically declared that he was more in favour of Trump than Harris. Only half of the population got entirely vaccinated against covid. 40% never even got the first dose.

What I mean is, things might be marginally better here or there, but there's nowhere that's great right now. We all have to fight to make where we are better.

[coochiequeens]

Finally someone in office calling out international surrogacy for being a new form of human trafficking.

By Joshua Solano Nov 02, 2024, 4:13 am

THE Bureau of Immigration (BI) is sounding the alarm over the increase in human trafficking cases involving women recruited for illegal surrogacy abroad, following the repatriation of seven victims on October 23, 2024.

These women, aged 20 to 30, were recruited to work as surrogate mothers for unknown clients abroad, the BI said in a press release on Saturday, November 2, 2024.

Merriam-Webster defines a surrogate mother as a "woman who becomes pregnant by artificial insemination or by implantation of a fertilized egg created by in vitro fertilization for the purpose of carrying the fetus to term for another person or persons."

The BI said three of the victims left the country under the guise of visiting relatives but fell victim to deceptive promises of surrogacy. The remaining four had no records and likely exited through unauthorized means, the BI added.

BI Commissioner Joel Anthony Viado said investigations reveal a scheme where traffickers recruit online, then arrange complex travel through multiple borders to avoid detection.

“The Philippines is being targeted by traffickers who lure women with surrogacy offers. We urge Filipinos to avoid these offers, as surrogacy abroad often carries serious legal risks,” Viado said.

In October, 20 Filipino women were rescued by authorities after reportedly being trafficked to become surrogate mothers. Of the 20 women, 13 were pregnant through artificial means.

The pregnant women were supposed to be transferred to another country where they would give birth. The seven others were deported by the Cambodian government over immigration law violations. BI officers also intercepted a 37-year-old woman recruited for surrogacy and headed to Georgia on October 15.

Senator Risa Hontiveros, who chairs the Senate Committee on Women, Children, Family Relations and Gender Equality, has earlier sought the conduct of a congressional inquiry into this "new form" of a human trafficking scheme victimizing Filipino women. (JGS/SunStar Philippines)