#chatgpt ;)

[pansnovidinnia]

i used it when it just came out to chat and say funny things to it. idk how ppl can use it for serious shit. the only thing it helped me with was an idea for a short story 🤷🏻

we need to make using chatgpt embarrassing bc sorry it really is. what do you mean you can’t write an email

[fairyminnie444]

Hi girl idk if u'll post this or not but i think it will help many people including me so one day I was scrolling through tumblr and saw a post regarding chatgpt for loa so in that Post it's says you can ask many things about loa from chat gpt and it will help you and the bloggers too cuz they are definitely tired of answering same questions again 😮‍💨 you can ask anything like explain manifestation from logical side or explain loa to a 5yr old kid something like this so and I am not into robotic affs that much but whenever I affirm I get a thought that it will not work I get that thought from inside but nvm leave that so I asked chatgpt for any solution and i think it will def help u all so he said you should rather than speaking I am confident speak I am learning to be confident and after some days gradually change the affs to back again the same that i am confident and i tried that once and it helped literally helped me and i didn't get any doubt

Yes, it works!

Tips:

Before asking your question, program the chat:

"Answer me as Neville Goddard"

"Answer me as someone who has studied the law of assumption for over 10 years and knows everything about it"

"Answer me as someone who has studied everything about Neville Goddard, Edward Art, Abdullah, Joseph Murphy and as someone who truly believes in the law and has had success stories"

[drlinguo]

Chomsky on “AI”

Their deepest flaw is the absence of the most critical capacity of any intelligence: to say not only what is the case, what was the case and what will be the case — that’s description and prediction — but also what is not the case and what could and could not be the case. Those are the ingredients of explanation, the mark of true intelligence.

Here’s an example. Suppose you are holding an apple in your hand. Now you let the apple go. You observe the result and say, “The apple falls.” That is a description. A prediction might have been the statement “The apple will fall if I open my hand.” Both are valuable, and both can be correct. But an explanation is something more: It includes not only descriptions and predictions but also counterfactual conjectures like “Any such object would fall,” plus the additional clause “because of the force of gravity” or “because of the curvature of space-time” or whatever. That is a causal explanation: “The apple would not have fallen but for the force of gravity.” That is thinking.

Source

[going2hell4everythingbutbeingbi]

chatgpt is the coward's way out. if you have a paper due in 40 minutes you should be chugging six energy drinks, blasting frantic circus music so loud you shatter an eardrum, and typing the most dogshit essay mankind has ever seen with your own carpel tunnel laden hands

[lunarcat982]

Remembering the time I asked ChatGPT to summarise the plot of portal 2 and it made the oracle turret (a random one off ‘character’) the main antagonist 😭😭

what is HAPPENING

[mostly-funnytwittertweets]

[animentality]

[thesecretuncle]

Baltimore is a beacon of hope in the war against The Machines

[chin-chillax]

One of the best uses for ChatGPT too

some people think writers are so eloquent and good with words, but the reality is that we can sit there with our fingers on the keyboard going, “what’s the word for non-sunlight lighting? Like, fake lighting?” and for ten minutes, all our brain will supply is “unofficial”, and we know that’s not the right word, but it’s the only word we can come up with…until finally it’s like our face got smashed into a brick wall and we remember the word we want is “artificial”.

[softwaring]

this reply kills me 😭 article link

[whydidisavethistomyphone]

[probablyasocialecologist]

A group of Wikipedia editors have formed WikiProject AI Cleanup, “a collaboration to combat the increasing problem of unsourced, poorly-written AI-generated content on Wikipedia.” The group’s goal is to protect one of the world’s largest repositories of information from the same kind of misleading AI-generated information that has plagued Google search results, books sold on Amazon, and academic journals. “A few of us had noticed the prevalence of unnatural writing that showed clear signs of being AI-generated, and we managed to replicate similar ‘styles’ using ChatGPT,” Ilyas Lebleu, a founding member of WikiProject AI Cleanup, told me in an email. “Discovering some common AI catchphrases allowed us to quickly spot some of the most egregious examples of generated articles, which we quickly wanted to formalize into an organized project to compile our findings and techniques.”

9 October 2024

[imaginarythingys]

See folks, that’s one reason why I’m anti-AI

The problem here isn’t that large language models hallucinate, lie, or misrepresent the world in some way. It’s that they are not designed to represent the world at all; instead, they are designed to convey convincing lines of text. So when they are provided with a database of some sort, they use this, in one way or another, to make their responses more convincing. But they are not in any real way attempting to convey or transmit the information in the database. As Chirag Shah and Emily Bender put it: “Nothing in the design of language models (whose training task is to predict words given context) is actually designed to handle arithmetic, temporal reasoning, etc. To the extent that they sometimes get the right answer to such questions is only because they happened to synthesize relevant strings out of what was in their training data. No reasoning is involved […] Similarly, language models are prone to making stuff up […] because they are not designed to express some underlying set of information in natural language; they are only manipulating the form of language” (Shah & Bender, 2022). These models aren’t designed to transmit information, so we shouldn’t be too surprised when their assertions turn out to be false.

ChatGPT is bullshit

[k9effect]

Want to hear something funny? Akinator would have been called AI if it was released today. None of this "AI" bullshit is actually anything intelligent. It's programs and algorithms and computer mimicry. It learns nothing. Chatgpt and openai and midjourney are just Akinator. The term "AI" is just a marketting ploy thats working painfully well with the people who don't understand that this tech has been around and in use for YEARS. Akinator was relased in 2007. Its just slightly more advanced Akinator tech, but its not anything artificially intelligent. I really wish we'd stop calling it "AI"

[postmodernmulticoloredcloak]

anyway in case you don’t know it yet