#cedric evans

[cherryblossomssmash]

[cinnamoodles]

smut is great but do you know what’s better? heart wrenching, soul twisting angst that makes you want to cry (take my money)

[blac-ivy]

Bitches complain about fandoms being dead but don't post about it themselves. Or even encourage the 4 or 5 writers breaking their backs carrying that fandom, with a like, a reblog or comment. You just want to consume the work and energy of others and can't even replenish their energy by showing your appreciation. The very least you can do for someone who provides entertainment or comfort or joy through their posts is give them a little ❤️

[alliwantforchristmasislou]

So at the beginning of this little project I decided I didn’t want to pressure the significant number of international viewers into donating to an American organization. So, I gave everyone the option to donate to a different charity as long as it stayed on theme. Mostly this meant queer charities across the world but there were donations to Animal Shelters (in celebration of Lou and Oliver’s love of animals), Women’s shelters (in honor of Maddie Han) and even medical organizations like Doctors Without Borders and UNICEF’s vaccination fund (in the theme of 911 in general)

There were so many organizations that were donated to and I wanted to spotlight them by country so without further ado:

International:

UNICEF

Médecins sans frontiers (2 donations)

Rainbow Refugee Support

SPCA (2 donations)

Aotearoa:

Rainbow Youth

Australia:

Minus18

VACCA

BlaQ

Black Rainbow

Brazil:

Casa Um

Eternamente Sou

Somos

Canada:

Rainbow Railroad (4 donations)

Czechia:

Konsent Initiative

Germany:

LSVD

Projekt Johanniter Luftretung

Queeres Netzwerk

Queeres Zentrum Mannheim

Netherlands:

COC (5 donations)

Dierenbescherming

Poland:

Grupa Stonewall (2 donations)

Romania:

Mozaiq LGBT

Singapore:

Ooga Chaga

Türkiye:

AFAD

Ukraine:

Ukrainian Firefighter Foundation

UK:

AKT (2 donations)

BLKOUT Foundation

Fighting With Pride

Kaleidoscope Trust

Just Like Us

LGBT Foundation

LGBT Health and Wellbeing

Outside Project

US:

ACLU (2 donations)

Ali Forney Center

Center on Halstead

Fortaleza Familiar

Gender Odyssey Alliance

Lambda Legal (7 donations)

MAGSD

Stonewall Community Foundation (2 donations)

SAGE

Tennessee Equality Project

Texas Litter Control

William Way Community Center

[atlasdoe]

IF I HAVE TO SEE ONE MORE "DUMBLEDORE WHERE HAVE YOU BURRIED ALL YOUR CHILDREN" TIKTOK WITH A BUNCH OF CHARACTERS WHOS DEATHS DUMBLEDORE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH I AM GOING TO LOSE MY GODDAMN MIND

[191angel]

me after saying ‘that’s my man’ to ten different people in the same show

[samijey]

A-Town Down Under are NOT scared of Kevin Owens and how dare you say otherwise!!!

[lumillsie]

ˏˋ°•*⁀➷ harry potter masterlist. ੈ✩‧₊˚

╰┈➤ godric gryffindor, salazar slytherin, rowena ravenclaw, helga hufflepuff, newt scamander, theseus scamander, tom marvolo riddle, abraxas malfoy, barty crouch jr, regulus black, severus snape, evan rosier, james potter, sirius black, remus lupin, peter pettigrew, lily evans, marlene mcckinnon, pandora lovegood, xenophilius lovegood, bill weasley, charlie weasley, fred weasley, george weasley, ron weasley, draco malfoy, theodore nott, blaise zabini, hermione granger, harry potter, oliver wood, cedric diggory

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ godric gryffindor. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ salazar slytherin. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ rowena ravenclaw. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ helga hufflepuff. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ newt scamander. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ theseus scamander. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ tom marvolo riddle. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ abraxas malfoy. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ barty crouch jr. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ regulus black. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ severus snape. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ evan rosier. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ james potter. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ sirius black. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ remus lupin. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ peter pettigrew. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ lily evans. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ marlene mckinnon. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ pandora lovegood. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ xenophilius lovegood. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ bill weasley. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ charlie weasley. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ fred weasley. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ george weasley. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ ron weasley. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ draco malfoy. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ theodore nott. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ blaise zabini. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ hermione granger. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ harry potter. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ oliver wood. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

˚₊· ͟͟͞͞➳❥ cedric diggory. ੈ✩‧₊˚

tba.

[angeldiarybook]

Hey yall… send request please 😼

Mostly for scream 1996 cast,the outsiders and TWD😭but I’ll take any request for these prompts

[themoonandthedogstar]

shout out the “(character) lives” tag on ao3, gotta be my favourite tag

[maxdibert]

Hi, I really like your blog. I have two questions. Why is Gryffindor supposedly "good" and Slytherin supposedly bad?

What about the other Hogwarts houses?

I think Rowling didn't anticipate that her saga would become so popular and probably had an idea of how she wanted to approach it at the beginning, which revolved around classic English children's literature, heavily inspired by Dickens or Dahl. We can see this in how the characters are initially presented in a completely one-dimensional way, with the magical world serving as a backdrop, a fantasy lacking depth, simply meant to make not only Harry but also the readers (who are children too) dream through Harry's eyes. The good characters are very good, and the bad characters are very bad—there's not much more to it. This is where Slytherin comes in as the rival house, the nemesis, the representation of the place where the bad guys go, like Voldemort, Draco (who is the typical character that irrationally antagonizes the protagonist, the rich bully), or Snape (the teacher that the protagonist hates because he has it out for him). It’s a concept that works for a children’s book because you don’t expect children’s literature to delve much deeper into the dichotomy between good and evil, as that’s how children’s literature is. This works in the second book as well, which maintains the tone, and even in the third. But starting from the fourth, this becomes quite problematic because Rowling begins to give her work, her world, and her characters a greater depth. Rowling transitions from children’s books to young adult books, and as the plot thickens, that complexity should also extend to the characters and worldbuilding. However, this is an area where Rowling fails miserably because she has laid down very solid foundations regarding the world she has created. Breaking those foundations and making them more complex would require a lot of work, and I simply believe she wanted to move forward, finish the saga more or less as she had conceived it, and that was it.

There are many things that fail, such as the fact that the dichotomy between good and evil is so present, with "gray" characters that are not fully developed, alongside the insistence on portraying characters who are not good or ethical (James, Dumbledore, Sirius) as if they are. This creates a constant cognitive dissonance. For example, I firmly believe that Rowling did not plan for James and Sirius to be so utterly unpleasant, disgusting, and violent at first, but she needed the reader to feel sympathy for Snape somehow or to understand where his hatred came from. So, she turns them into despicable bullies, the same ones she previously presented as examples. At the same time, we have to believe that Lily, who is the epitome of goodness and morality as presented at the beginning of the saga, ended up marrying a bully. These are plot holes; they don’t make sense at all. These are things she could have justified by giving those characters more nuances, more personality, and providing us with more references, but she chooses not to because that would break certain foundations she established in the early novels that she doesn’t want to touch. Thus, we are left without coherent explanations for certain events.

The same thing happens with the houses. I mean, it’s understandable that a child Harry would see Slytherin as the worst hole in the world, but a teenage Harry, a 15 or 16-year-old Harry, should have a broader perspective. Rowling doesn’t do this because she already had in mind who the bad guys would be from the start; including good characters in that house would mean having to change the very rules she established at the beginning of the story or even having to alter the course of some of her characters. While this is perfectly possible, attainable, and can be done, it requires a lot of work and development of the world and the characters, and we are talking about someone who doesn’t stop to complicate those things. She follows her narrative course to the end, even though there are issues that we have to accept despite their multiple inconsistencies.

Gryffindor is supposed to be the good house because they are brave, but the reality is that most characters who truly exemplify Gryffindor qualities are complete jerks. James and Sirius are bullies, Remus is a coward who goes around impregnating twenty-somethings and abandoning them, Peter is a traitor, Dumbledore is a manipulator who doesn’t give a damn about his students unless they serve a purpose in his plans, Hagrid is an irresponsible figure for his students, Ginny ends up being something like the popular girl, and in reality, she’s a resentful brat who martyrs everyone who says something she doesn’t like. I know you love the twins, but their pranks are terrible; I wouldn’t have tolerated people like that in my class, and many of them are dangerous.

In Western culture, there has always been that ideal of the hero, the knight who goes to war and either dies or triumphs, always wielding a sword. This is a bit like Gryffindor. I understand using that at the beginning of the saga because it was for children, but it ages very poorly. And it does because Rowling doesn’t want to step out of her dichotomy of good versus evil. There are Gryffindors who are just as bad or worse than many Slytherins, but their actions are never condemned, nor does the narrative treat them as something completely negative (because they make excuses or justifications) simply because Rowling established from the beginning that those characters were good, and therefore they had to remain good until the end, even though many of their actions are inconsistent with that discourse. On the other hand, Rowling herself was surprised when Draco Malfoy ended up having several fans because she had established that Draco was horrible, was bad, and had no redeeming qualities. But at the same time, she presents a 16-year-old boy terrified because a psychopath is threatening his family and he feels compelled to kill (something he doesn’t want to do) because otherwise, they will kill his parents, and Rowling expects us not to feel empathy? That we think that boy is a horrible monster? That’s what I mean by the cognitive dissonance with her own rules and characters; it simply doesn’t make sense.

The characters from other houses are merely extras or barely matter until almost the end of the saga (Luna doesn’t appear until the fifth book) because clearly, Rowling didn’t give importance to the other houses; they weren’t part of her good versus evil dichotomy; they were just part of the decoration. Then she realizes she has to give them something, so in the fourth book, we have Cedric, and in the fifth, we have Luna and Tonks, because, of course, the story is no longer for children; the story is no longer just about Gryffindor vs. Slytherin (although it still is), but she again fails because she is not able to turn around the established foundations, and her attempt remains just that: an attempt.

[depressedcoffeeobsess]

I need you guys to give me requests! Wether you are a writer or not. Cause I'm literally sulking in the corner , with my blankets on my body , eating fresh oreo icecream , watching Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban like the loner I am for the 12th time. Pretty please with a big cute strawberry on top for Joy? 🍓 🍰 🍓 🍰 🍓 🍰 🍓 🍰 🍓 🍰

[mrsbarnesxxx]

Me asking you guys to please send requests my way because I can't possibly work on one of my 30+ drafts.

[rosemarycovet]

characters I write for

twilight

Edward Cullen

Alice Cullen

emmet Cullen

Jasper Hale

Rosalie Hale

Bella Swan

SCREAM

(Mostly billy and Stu)

Billy Loomis

Stu Macher

Randy Meeks

Sidney Prescott

Tatum Riley

Dewey Riley

Mickey Altieri

Roman Bridger

Jill Robert

Ethan landry

Tara carpenter

Sam Carpenter

Chad meeks

Amber Freeman

gilmore girls

(chilton) Rory Gilmore

Dean Forester

Jess Mariano

Tristin Dugray

Dave Rygalski

Lane Kim

Finn Wolfhard characters

Mike wheeler

Boris pavlikovsky

Miles Fairchild

Richie Toizer

Harry potter/wizarding world

Theodore Nott

Mattheo Riddle

Tom Riddle

Draco Malfoy

Cedric Diggory

Harry potter

Ron Weasley

American Horror Story

Tate Langdon

Violet Harmon

kit walker

Zoe Benson

Kyle Spencer

Madison Montgomery

Jimmy darling

James march

Euphoria

rue bennett

Jules vaughn

maddy perez

cassie howard

lexi howard

kat hernandez

Fezco

Elliot

Nate Jacobs

chris mckay

Scott pilgrim VS. The world

Scott pilgrim

Ramona Flower

wallace wells (x male reader)

Envy Adams

Knives Chau

Kim Pine

Random

Rodrick Heffely-Diary of a wimpy kid

Patrick bateman-American Pyscho

Jesse Pinkman-Breaking bad

Peeta Mellark-hunger games

Finnick Odair-hunger games

Nanno-Girl from no where

Danny Jenner-Jeepers Creepers

Kat Stratford-10tihay

Patrick Verona-10tihay

Cameron James-10tihay

Dave Lizewski-Kick ass

Charlie-the perks of being a wallflower

jennifer check- jennifer’s body

Tim LaFlour-senseless

Robin Buckley-stranger things

glen glantz-nightmare on elm street

Request are open

[nuninho2000]

attractive hp characters?

Attractiveness is somewhat subjective but in canon the male characters are ( no order) : Sirius, young Tom Riddle, Bill Weasley and Cedric Diggory and Lockhart .

As for Harry ( my favourite character) i think Harry was a damn good-looking kid who grew into a really handsome young adult, but he was so badly groomed and appallingly dressed in school that nobody noticed that for quite a long time. He himself still didn't have a clue by the end of the series, which also kept people from noticing his looks.

But Harry's father was handsome and his mother was beautiful, and he grew out of being short and skinny in his mid-teens. If he'd had an untroubled youth, Harry Potter might have been a school heartthrob like his father, but well. His youth was troubled enough to keep him from ever once thinking about how he looked.

Having said that, I’ve always imagined Ron to be slightly above average looking.

I think there’s a lot of factors in being attractive. Let’s say Ron is relatively good looking. He’s still pretty insecure, which shows, and a Weasley, so snobby girls aren’t going to be into him right off the bad. He’s also argumentative, which some people are going to love and others are going to hate. He’s really very funny, and once he gets the hang of it, he does well on the Quidditch team. He’s a generally nice, well-liked person. I would assume that made him the source of some crushes from younger girls and a few interested parties in his own year and the years directly below and above him.

For the female characters are ( no order) : Lily , Fleur, Cho , Ginny , Pattil twins , Bellatrix ( before Azkaban) and Madame Rosmerta.

For Hermione she had a bit of a glow up by Goblet. I don't think she was ever supposed to be Emma Watson level attractive, but I think she was supposed to be very pretty. Her looks are not as talked up as the other attractive characters in the books because the books are largely told from harry's perspective and he is not personally attracted to her. We do however see that characters like Ron, Viktor, Cormac, and a few others (particularly at the Yule ball) think she is very attractive.

In my opinion, attracting women for me are : Fleur, Madam Rosmerta , Lily , Tonks , Ginny , Tonks , Hermione , Bellatrix ( before Azkaban ) and Cho

For the men - Sirius , Bill ,Cedric, Harry , Charlie , James , Ron and Tom