#category-classic
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
your tags. yeah. it's not that they are progressive or feminist or even written by women -- but they are doing something with women that is complex and worth paying attention to, and in many cases they are the reason we have a version of a particular woman's story at all
yeah that's one of the marketing conceits of the myth retelling novel industrial complex that bothers me, it's the framing as if no one has ever paid attention to these female characters who are buried unnoticed in the myths when often the most complete or the most authoritative version of the character's story that survives from antiquity is in tragedy, a genre that is notoriously interested in bringing female characters out of the house and putting them on stage in active roles, and in using those female characters to explore issues of gender and the place of women in contemporary society.
like to a certain degree it makes sense for the homeric women who don't appear in (extant) tragedy, like briseis or the hanged women in odyssey 22, but we have stories where clytemnestra and deianira and medea insist on make narrative space for themselves to tell their own stories from their own perspectives, refusing to be silent about the violence their society inflicts upon women and the lasting damage it does. they're called aeschylus' agamemnon and sophocles' trachiniae and euripides' medea. and maybe you want to retell those stories for modern audiences, changing things or emphasizing different aspects of them! and that's great! but framing it as if they've been ignored and their stories are as-yet-untold is just not accurate, and it's a cheap way to paint your work as innovative and subversive.
#interestingly the exception is medusa. who really is never given her own voice in antiquity *because she's never imagined as a person*#so like. the same way there nobody in antiquity wanted to look at the labors of heracles from the perspective of the hydra.#but (following ovid) modern reception tends to understand medusa as a person with interiority and her own perspective#in a way that i dont think would have made sense to anyone in archaic or classical greece#and medusa is often put into this category of 'misunderstood women' for the purposes of retellings#mine#ask#wizardysseus#retellings#reception
965 notes
·
View notes
Text
Here's how to spot a Mad Scientist:
Is very smart in a specific field
Probably hasn't slept in the past 4 days
Depressed
Slowly decends into madness/spirals/gets obsessed over something to the point where they destroy their lives over it
Here are other minor signs you might want to look out for (doesn't apply to all Mad Scientist):
Very pathetic. A loser, if you will
Is gay
Wears glasses
Has a best friend who is extremely friendly and also a poet
Graying hair despite their relatively youthful appearance
Can be a little bit silly (as a treat)
Note that not all Mad Scientists are actual scientists. The Mad Scientist can be disguised as something else and may try to trick you; do not be fooled. Look for these traits to identify a real wild Mad Scientist.
Now you are ready to go out into the wild and find your very own Mad Scientists to hyperfixate on for the next month! Hope this helped❤️
#jekyll and hyde#frankenstein#viktor arcane#jonathan sims#the strange case of dr jekyll and mr hyde#victor frankenstein#the magnus archives#arcane#dr jekyll and mr hyde#henry jekyll#edward hyde#yes i am hyperfixating on them#yes i simp for them all#yes I am also including c!Wilbur in this category#what are you gonna do about it??#I WILL HYPERFOXATE ON ALL THE MAD SCIENTISTS AND NO ONE WILL STOP ME#mad scientist#mad science#character trope#character tropes#maybe the real hyperfixation was the simp i became along the way#gothic literature#classic literature memes#classic literature#frankenstein or the modern prometheus#autism#adhd#ALSO STANFORD PINES!!!#it's more of a gender#ROBOTNIK TOO
2K notes
·
View notes
Text

#they should all be under murder tbh#and a lot of other categories too#doctor who#dw#classic who#dr who#new who#first doctor#second doctor#third doctor#fourth doctor#fifth doctor#sixth doctor#seventh doctor#eighth doctor#ninth doctor#tenth doctor#eleventh doctor#twelfth doctor#thirteenth doctor#memes#dw memes#doctor who memes
964 notes
·
View notes
Text
with regards to clara the changeling, i am running on the idea that greater and powerful beings take on more approachable forms like that of a child's to be less intimidating
#one could argue that a teenager does not apply in this category but they all describe clara as a charming girl#some sarcastic but most are genuine#mind control powers or no she is in the form of a child#honestly i have so many thoughts about clara#the clara i am talking about here in particular is classic hd clara#pathologic classic hd#pathologic#clara the changeling#bean talks
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
this comment was made in response to a bunch of terf bs and I don't tend to like sharing their stuff directly but I desperately wanted to preserve this line on my blog. sorry for stealing your post ms doubleca5t.
#one of their lines of argument was like#'sex isn't a social construct humans aren't a social construct animals and land aren't social constructs'#and like. comrade. I have some really bad news about the history of the construction of 'humanity' as a category.#'people are not a social construct' says person who sees no problem in calling everyone 'males' and 'females' as nouns#marina marvels at life#id in alt text#anyway I think this line is going to live in my head in a similar place as my classic#'me when I haven't been banned from my local lgbt center' litany for when I see weird exclusionism
189 notes
·
View notes
Text
Potential January Reads
A Brilliant Night of Ice and Stars by Rebecca Connolly
Rhododendron Pie by Margery Sharp
So Big by Edna Ferber
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
Vibrant Paradoxes by Bishop Robert Barron
The Diary of a Country Priest by George Bernanos
Doctor Thorne by Anthony Trollope
Katherine Wentworth by D.E. Stevenson
#monthly reading lists#books#i have so many specific books that i've been lining up#(especially since at the end of the month i was saving new books for the new year)#that i don't need the wider categories#the january categories are still represented#we have lots of vintage fiction (including an american one)#the first book is the story of the carpathia's rescue of the titanic#soon as i saw that premise i was like 'yes please'#it will cover january's category of a book with a cold setting#i read the first couple of chapters and a novel from the perspective of real people is very weird but i like the story so i'll keep going#i also started 'rhododendron pie' and it seems delightful#it's about someone straddling the worlds of normal grounded people and artsy people#and as someone from the world of normal grounded people who likes artsy stuff but still has the perspective that a lot of it is quite silly#i think it will be nice and relatable#i think i'm going to succumb to jane-eyre-ry#every time i consider a different classic reread my brain's just like 'what about jane eyre though?'#'vibrant paradoxes' is a book of essays that i got for free along with my book of church fathers#it's a very thick book to give away for free and looks good#i love essays and these are nice and short#it'll be good to dip into through the month#(i also want to read the church fathers book but that's not something to put on a monthly reading list)#(just something to read through thoughtfully like the bible)#'diary of a country priest' caught my attention months ago#and now that the library hold came in i have zero interest#but maybe putting it on a list will convince me to try#i'd kind of like to keep this one-barchester-a-month thing going and 'doctor thorne' is next#'katherine wentworth' is exactly the kind of vintage fiction that january is made for and i'd like to try and get it off my unread shelf#oh and i forgot to mention someone recommended ferber's first book#but when i downloaded that one i also figured maybe i should read the famous pulitzer-prize-winning one
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
nine books to read in 2025 📖









ty for the tags @static-radio-ao3 @blackberry-sunset @frank-lilac
tagging @twisted-tales-told @itsjaywalkers @a-fiery-fox @angel-daydreams @wdcmaxy @moongays @emlovessid
#here's my logic guys#top row cateogry : new releases this year#middle row category: neglected books that have been rotting on my shelf for months/years crying out to me for love and attention#last row: a classic - a play - and a nonfiction on my list!#yay 2025 book wish list lets see if i literally do anything i say i will#nine books to read in 2025
26 notes
·
View notes
Text

i’m right and i should say it
#this and pillow book belong in a category i like to call#he did softcore corn but called it indie film instead#anyways#classic ewan wish he did it again
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
Was Ingo a true tumblr sexyman???? (Poll)
Ok so i have seen many debates over what makes a tumblr sexyman and i want to know what the consensus is on Ingo's sexyman status. Here are some points of discussion to think about:
is he weird-looking enough?
clothing/silhouette
tumblr sexyman vs blorbo vs babygirl culture. which one fits best?
personality. are tumblr sexymen required to be fucked up freaks?
was the fandom insane/horny enough to qualify him as a sexyman? How inexplicable was his fandom popularity/portrayal?
popularity in terms of scope and legacy. And do other sites cultures count? ex. jpn fandom on twit
twink death????
And to anyone who may come across this and don't know anything about Ingo, feel free to vote based on visuals alone lol

#warden ingo#subway boss ingo#submas#pokemon#poll#im curious to see what people think#personally i feel like he overall qualifies but warden ingo was a little bit more of a popular blorbo rather than a true sexyman#ingo classic would absolutely be a sexyman imo but i think warden ingo was overall more popular on tumblr fandom so its hard to say#also this isnt a competition im just curious to see what ppls thoughts are so the poll isnt designed to maximize votes into any category#sorry if this is formatted weird this is the first poll ive made lol
93 notes
·
View notes
Text
I do see fan work and stuff off by having the Rms having free will and it sorta rubs me in a weird way. It’s not to say it’s wrong just…it sorta makes X’s existence feel…insignificant. Probably a skill issue at my end probably-
Ngl I do have an interpretation of the Classic series when it comes to the RMs in pretty sure someone has done it before. So basically an idea is that three key traits of what makes a robot master different compared to other typical Robots as I like to call them the 3 traits:
Purpose
Personality
Interpretation
Purpose means that a Robot is built and made with a purpose. They are completely programmed with a purpose in mind and they must follow that purpose whenever they like it or not.
Personally, a Robot has their own individuality (kinda), it’s their likes and dislikes, traits that make them who they are in a sense. Their identity basically
Interpretation, this is the best part. While an RM is built to follow that purpose in mind they can interpret how they approach it. They still follow that purpose regardless of the actions that they take it’s how they do it
Like an example is Rock and Roll, they are both made to help and assist but because of their personality they interpret it differently. For Rock when wily programmed the RMs to be evil, his personality being more in a Righteous side allows him to interpret that in order to assist people he must fight them (and choose to be a hero) to save people. In the definition of his purpose is to *Help* so he’s still following that directive.
Roll on the other is still assistance but she takes a more of a supporting role. Helping dr. light, doing domestic work and keeping everyone safe and happy. Because her personality is softer (she also shares that same sense of justice like her brother but lacks the drive, however she can still wreck ya with the broom).
Blues is sorta interesting while in this case you could say that he lacks purpose and only has personality and interpretation. But fundamentally speaking he has all three
Since blues is a “Prototype”, my idea that perhaps he made his own purpose in the form of by being an *Example* for other robots in his own way. We can sorta see that of how he “Mentors” Rock in a sense. He has a more loose interpretation but his personality dominates even more. Having more “Free will” but still holding in the 3 main laws of robotics.
It also connects the idea that maybe Rock's attempted attack on Wily was not him breaking the laws per se but rather attempting to find a loophole in his programming. As an attempt to solve the problem in his own way, Wily has been actively harming people, endangering them. Being extremely frustrated that Wily doesn’t stop endangering his family and innocents. So in his programming came to the conclusion that in order to help and protect innocents is by destroying him. So this results in his programming clashing with the 3 laws of robotics.
This also can apply to all the Other RM and Bass himself.
But at the end of the day they are robots who just happen to emote and have their own personality but still bound by their programming. Just smart toasters who are trying their bests-
#megaman x#megaman#megaman classic#Rockman#Mm#but I will say this the only advanced Rms that are their own category is Shadow man and the stardroids#+ Duo#these fuckers are from space so they are their own league#subscribe for more Shit take- *Gunshots*
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Shortlisted: Felicity Jones, The Brutalist / Laurie Babin, Red Rooms / Danielle Deadwyler, The Piano Lesson / Sophie Okonedo, Janet Planet / Michelle Buteau, Babes / Mahsa Rostami, The Seed of the Sacred Fig / Divya Prabha, All We Imagine as Light / Isabella Rossellini, La Chimera / Anna Baryshnikov, Love Lies Bleeding
THE NOMINEES ARE:
CAROL DUARTE, LA CHIMERA
as "Italia"

JULIA FAURE, COMA
as "Patricia Coma"

JACK HAVEN, I SAW THE TV GLOW
as "Maddy"

TILDA SWINTON, PROBLEMISTA
as "Elizabeth"
AND THE CRISTAL GOES TO...
MICHELE AUSTIN, HARD TRUTHS
as "Chantelle"
#Apologies to Jack Haven for placing them in this category#But my Oscarphilia has left me with an unfortunate attachment to the classic gendered acting categories#And their work was too good not to nominate so I slotted them here since they are playing a female character#Though I suppose even that could be up for debate so fuck me I guess#❤️#2024 Film#Best Supporting Actress#Michele Austin#Hard Truths#Carol Duarte#La Chimera#Julia Faure#Coma#Jack Haven#I Saw the TV Glow#Tilda Swinton#Problemista
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
I could elaborate on said negative feelings but that would require not having a runny nose
#but tldr hinduism isn't even a religion in the classical sense like islam or judaism#it's just a category the british pulled out of their asses to group disperate traditions from all over the subcontinent cause they thought#the gods looked similar enough luhmao it's a recently named misnomer and the only thing keeping said misnomer 2gether is caste#abolishing hinduism means doing away with this category and eradicating caste not wiping every “dharmic practice” that originated#in the subcontinent off the planet cuz like it's also just randomly appropriated indigenous traditions too which hmm#<- im eepy and i didnt know how to phrase that...hopefully you get what i mean. historical brahmanism is aaj ka hinduism only just be honest#and say brahmanism wont u. that way you're signalling who it's really for#there are so many practices from all over the subcontinent that are Not casteist please i am on my knees you dont have 2 do that janeu shit#i could go on 4ever but i'll stop i'm actually sad now#but ye it's colonial to label disperate practices for the sake of clerical ease abolishing hinduism doesn't involve the destruction of gods#okay i will explain that part one day. that day is not today i'm going 2 sleep fr#ਰੇਵਾ
20 notes
·
View notes
Note
why does l apologize so much during the foot drying scene? seems ooc
Hmmm, I agree wichu, I feel it's a bit out of character for the original manga!L to do something like that. In some ways the anime versions of the characters are a bit different than the manga ones, and the manga ones are the ones I'm usually thinking about when I'm thinking about characterization 'n' such.
My best guess about it is that anime!L is going through something like the first hints of character development at this point? It's definitely an emotional change to how he's been acting and interacting with Light up until this scene (which is kinda a little bit of a gripe I have with episode 25... I certainly don't hate it, and I'm very fond of the rain scene and think it's iconic and interesting in its own way. I just think that they didn't build up to it super well in the previous episodes, and that it therefore feels a bit out of nowhere and emotionally out of sync with how they've been setting everything up between L and Light until this point).
Anyway, I think L is feeling sad and worried about how things are going to go from here on out (as Light has regained his memories and suddenly been acting very ominously like Kira again, and from what I remember I think L pretty much knows that after they do this next test on the notebook one or the other of them are probably going to actually die/lose?) And based on some of the stuff he says I think he is realizing that he doesn't actually have any close relationships or people he can truly trust and open up to in his life, which seems to be a bit of a regret of his now. I think he obviously felt some sort of a kinship with Light that he'd genuinely never felt before as well (as imo the "first ever friend" scene is both sarcastic/ironic and sincere at the same time, if that makes sense). And I think even though he is dropping the mind games for a moment and trying to have an actual heart-to-heart with Light that Light can't actually reciprocate it due to the circumstances, which maybe just reaffirms to L how alone he really is (that even the one person he actually felt something like a friendship with still can't be trusted or be somebody he can have an honest conversation with). I feel like L sort of just moves things to some sort of symbolic physical way of connecting with Light instead (which seems to be a biblical reference to Jesus washing Judas' and the other disciples' feet, like saying "I know you're going to betray me / but I forgive you anyway" or some such thing?) And maybe the apology is just because he's genuinely feeling a bit awkward and unsure of himself and humbled and like he's actually going to lose to Light soon, but idk.
Even if it's not REALLY something I can picture manga!L doing, and even though I genuinely prefer manga!L's characterization in most ways, I also think it was interesting of the anime to put a moment in where one of them tries to temporarily drop the games for a little bit, and where they both seem to be genuinely feeling a bit soft with each other and regretful that they hadn't met another way.
#if you have ever heard of that category of characters that i think is called 'iconic characters'#where they can stay interesting and likable to an audience even despite having no character development from episode to episode#like idk james bond or any of the super famous classic detectives in literature/tv. they're kinda supposed to never change#or never think that they truly need to change. and i think L is actually one of those kind of characters#so giving him character development isnt REALLY the point of his character or always an improvement of his writing to me#however idk i still like that scene as its own thing#l lawliet#ask#anon#death note#p
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
idk if this is even really a bad thing in fan spaces but i think that a lot of people are just not very genre savvy when it comes to engaging with the media that they enjoy
#i see it a lot with horror and comedy but idk if that's just my limited sphere of personally also enjoying horror and comedy#obviously it's easy to see with horror when people just do not want to engage with horror on any level#but there's something about the way some people engage with comedy series that i can't quite put my finger on why it bother me so much#like maybe it's the difference between taking the story seriously vs. making everything in the story serious#especially in hybrid genres like tragicomedy#i've seen people be like 'how is the bear a comedy? how is succession a comedy?' etc. i think because of awards show categories lol#and it's like okay. i think we are not reading tone or we have a very limited scope for how we define comedy#like that is a classic dramedy#there are moments of dry or dark humor but also just genuinely funny moments despite a pretty serious premise#so maybe it's tricky sometimes when there's a thin line like that or when shows switch tone or have a lot of pathos for their characters#but. idk. sometimes we are making everything so serious#or on the flip side of horror. making everything so un-serious lol#again i don't think this is totally a bad thing in fan spaces which are a place for exploration and engagement with many angles of a story#which sometimes means getting into the implications of a throwaway joke or highlighting the humor of a situation framed seriously in canon#of course. we all do it. classic fan engagement behavior#but sometimes i think it bleeds over a little too much into interpretation of actual literal canon#anyway just a thought#maybe it's also like a 'i think people are being fake deep' thing which is not genre specific#people can be fake deep about shit that actually is narratively 'serious' too#it might also be a question of self awareness? idk
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Potential December Reads
Barchester Towers by Anthony Trollope
Last Christmas in Paris by Hazel Gaynor and Heather Webb
The Unselected Journals of Emma M. Lion: Volume 8 by Beth Brower
Prudence and the Romantic Poet by Nina Clare
A Christmas-related book
The Cricket on the Hearth and/or The Haunted Man by Charles Dickens
The Christmas Blossoms by Priscilla Smith McCaffrey
One of the American Girl books
A religious book
Church Fathers: From Clement of Rome to Augustine by Pope Benedict XVI
Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis
St. Francis of Assisi by G.K. Chesterton
Arriving at Amen: Seven Catholic Prayers Even I Can Pray by Leah Libresco
A middle-grade book
Impossible Creatures by Katherine Rundell
Insignificant Events in the Life of a Cactus by Dusti Bowling
The Happy Prince and Other Stories Oscar Wilde
The Wanderer by Sharon Creech
Mandy by Julie Andrews
#monthly reading lists#books#trying a new format#because most of my categories are so vague#and i have so many things on my reading list clamoring for attention within those categories#that i need to feature them all as options without committing to any particular one#most of the options are things that were impulse purchases or library picks sitting on my reading piles#if anyone wants to campaign for a particular one (or suggest something different within one of the categories) go for it#after loving 'the warden' i saved 'barchester towers' as a december book#because i wanted to save the big book for a new month#and this would fulfill my december need for a new cozy-yet-crunchy classic#'last christmas in paris' fits for the christmas vibes and also i have a desire for epistolary fiction#emma m lion came out early!#it's a priority but also i don't want to be done with it too soon#i didn't even realize the nina clare book was coming out until a couple days before release#they're not great lit but i've found that after clunky beginnings these books turn out to have surprisingly depth and complexity#(still on a regency romance scale)#i've sometimes wondered if i might like her better than heyer because the servants are people#the dynamics may not be historically accurate but seeing the loyal servants in gaskell it's accurate enough#and it's not like heyer didn't build her own flavor of regency fantasy world so i like one that includes the lower classes#and anyway after last month's poetry escapades this premise will be extra fun
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
assad zaman pls accept my friend request on spotify
#i need NEED to know what kind of fucked up 8tracks emo shit is going on in that playlist.#my gut says its prob a lot of classical music but thats such a vast category. i need the specifics???? and does he imagine that this is#music armand listens to or is it music that is about armand. LETS TALK!!!#my armand song of the day is sans titre by jean-michel blais. i associate him w like neoclassical minimalist piano stuff#this is ofc influenced by the soundtrack. “amadeo” + whatever keeps playing in 2x05 with the heavy slow piano notes#iwtv
21 notes
·
View notes