#brenneri
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Photo
Quick Sketch Concept of my Starfinder character. Still figuring out looks & need help with naming. She's an Operative/Hacker & working as a Correctional Counselor, helping rehabilitate prisoners.
#Starfinder#Pathfinder 2E#brenneri#SpaceOtter#Scifi#Space#otter#anthromorphic#furry anthro#ttrpg character
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
Madwheeler and Super-El: Max and Mike's perspectives on El as the (super)hero
working on another post pondering El's role as "the hero" vs the way the show really doesn't support that concept, and places huge importance on teamwork instead.
the hero is usually the strong/capable one expected to take all the risks and save the day, and other characters feel free to throw them at danger without fearing too much for their safety, especially if they also have powers. but when the hero is a little girl, that's harder.
so today I'm chewing on how El is viewed in that light by the two people closest to her - both of whom are prone to contextualizing her powers through a fantasy lens.
so, here comes one of my favorite El-Max topics, but also one where I've shortchanged Mike in the past. I need to revise some of the old stuff I've said about Bad Guy Mike identifying El as a superhero vs Good Guy Max identifying El as just a girl with superpowers. that was a pretty superficial read on both ends.
(I'm sure the Mike parts will be kindergarten review for his fans/analysts, but I don't usually pay him much attention; this is aimed more at the Mike-hater/ignorer elmax crowd I spawned from)
this is a long ramble, but a fun one I think!
let's start with Max.
for her, El begins as a mythological figure. she doesn't believe she exists as described by Lucas. but then El proves her existence via a very badass entrance, and it only supports Max's idea of her as some kind of invincible, superhero-esque figure.
Max scoffs at the idea of El needing Hopper's protection at the lab. actually, El does need it, bigtime! closing the gate takes all her focus, and without Hopper there to fend off demodog attacks, she probably couldn't have done it.
Max doesn't see that, though, and presumably spends little or no time around El between seasons, so her first impression goes unchallenged for almost a year.
we find s3 Max locked in HARD in her faith in El as the hero who can solo the baddie, take care of herself, and save everyone else. she seems to picture that having superpowers means El has nothing to fear.
the sauna is the first time Max actually sees El fight, and it doesn't go how she expects
El fights Billy, but gets overpowered at one point. everybody's stunned: this is the first time any of the party has ever seen El not decisively win a fight, so "uhhh... should we do something?" doesn't kick in instantly. Max and the others watch as El gets choked purple. only Mike intervenes to save her life and give her a moment to regain control of the fight.
"like she needs protection" and "you have super powers! what's the worst that could happen?" age like milk here. this is when Max sees that El is not invincible and needs help. lesson learned!
... ehh well.. actually what happens is, Max doubles down on her solo-hero-El stance after this and has a bigtime attitude about it.
and, okay, I'm ready to admit that Max's overconfidence towards El's abilities leads to her treating El more like she's a superhero than Mike does during this era. not her intent, but, what's said is said. (I'll get into it, bear with me)
when Mike worries about El endangering herself, Max accuses him of not respecting El's right to make her own choices. when Lucas suggests killing the MF with fireworks, she eyerolls him for thinking any non-El approach could be of value.
nobody was 100% right or wrong, but I see Max having the most crow to eat after all this. Mike was right to worry about El's limits and fear for brain damage: she loses her powers entirely (in the sense that this is later likened to the brain-scrambling of a stroke, can it not be said that El did take brain damage from the MF? not exactly how Mike meant it, but?). and Lucas is no dummy for the fireworks idea: it's all that stops El from getting flayed at one point.
El still helps save the day in s3, but as the big powerful solo hero? nah. least of any season. Max's repeated bets on her powers lose.
so why did watching El almost die in the sauna seem to have no effect on Max's perception of her? why does she still assert that El alone will kick all the flayed butts in 3x6, after she needed some nerd's help kicking (1) flayed butt in 3x4?
there is a visible effect! just not the one you expect right away.
mid-3 is Max's guilt and denial era
3 is when all the issues are coalescing that leave Max depressed in 4: she wished for something terrible to happen to Billy, and now it is, so it feels like it's her fault. she's not ready to cope with the guilt that comes from that, or any of the other dominos that are falling as a result.
"I just stood there and watched" is textually about Billy and the flesh monster. but if Max feels guilt for inaction, she would have similar feelings about El in the sauna, where she also took no action.
Max specified that her inaction with Billy wasn't because she was scared or weak, but because she didn't know if he deserved to be saved. It being a decision not to act is why she feels so terrible about it. I see no reason to think it was radically different in the sauna: I could completely buy that she somewhat chose not to act because she didn't think El needed to be saved.
I don't think either are cases of Max blaming herself for an uncontrollable freeze response, because we see multiple illustrations of her not having that response, whether it's herself or others in danger.
post-sauna, Max has plainly seen that El did need protection, and is struggling with the fact that she didn't provide any. the bathroom scene is when her guilt is the clearest, imo.
watch how she gets lost in the sight of El's bruises and stops what she's doing, and the way she asks if it hurts. you can imagine her logic in feeling like those bruises are her fault: both for "causing" the greater situation and for not making a move to help.
but what's really telling is the abrupt change of subject and tone from "are you in pain?" to "lol that Mike's a yapper amirite?". she has a lot of nerve putting Mike down after he's the one who just saved El's ass, right? but that's exactly why she does it. this is 14 year old coping with heavy feelings in an immature manner, as they'll do.
choosing Mike isn't just a random "lol madwheeler worsties" attempt to cheer El up. it's an attempt to bury her shame at her own inaction compared to his action in the sauna. by getting a laugh out of El at Mike's expense and shifting the theme of the scene towards making fun of the boys, she's steering into waters that reflect more favorably on herself, and her bond with El, than him/his.
so I think that's one big reason Max is doubling down on her confidence in El in mid-3: to absolve her guilt. she's trying to convince herself that El really CAN take care of herself despite what she saw. because if El is superheroically powerful, Max has nothing to feel guilty about (and in fact, is El's only good, supportive friend for having faith in her!)
season 3's war of the sexes
here's another reason I think Max doubles down. she has some male-specific trust issues at play behind the scenes in this season that have been messing up her relationship. as a result of El coming to her for advice, Max's private personal trauma-foibles get projected out into this "stupid boys" war of the sexes that clogs up most of the party's season.
why do I bring up trust issues? because Max does. her framing in the cabin argument is pretty bullshit: she spins Mike's concern for El's wellbeing into an issue of trust. which is a kinda odd word for the situation, especially considering it does not play to her advantage.
look at her regret that she let that word escape containment lmao:
Max thinks boyfriends can't be trusted, so it follows that girlfriends should always be trusted - and "trust" here means "trust El to save the day without killing herself". even though I trust it's been explained to her that that's classic El behavior.
she presents her case to Nancy and Jonathan, but a fair trial for Mike goes out the window when only Nancy weighs in. yep, the Nancy who's fresh off her own war with Jonathan about workplace misogyny and how he should've trusted her about the rat story. so Nancy's ruling (while none of it is wrong) has a heavy bias in the same direction as Max's, and totally glosses over the valid aspects of what Mike's saying. lmao at the way Jon mutes himself for this discussion. she's never wrong, son.
El's agency and ability prevail as the only real issues among the loudest voices in the room - neither of whom share the trauma of already having witnessed El exercise both to sacrifice herself.
oh, but then look what happens as soon as El starts losing another fight:
at least some of that was denial, because it ends abruptly right here. Max doesn't need it anymore, because she has something way better: another chance.
I think if the sauna truly hadn't changed Max's mind about El, then Max would've done the same thing here (stood and watched). but she doesn't. this time when El gets overpowered fighting the flesh monster and almost gets yoinked, Max jumps in to help pull her back.
(this is how we can be sure Max's inaction with Billy and the FM wasn't merely a freeze response. "I imagine myself running to you, pulling you away" - they showed her able and willing to do exactly that for El)
this is a huge step. but still, the anti-Lucas-fireworks stuff happens even after this. (she's a work in progress, okay?)
in fairness, El's powers are the more effective approach. she still has them here, and nobody foresees her losing them over a leg injury. if all had gone as expected, El would've probably done the heavy lifting in another FM fight at the mall. Max doesn't have to be so dismissive of conventional backup plans, but she's not wrong-wrong about this particular one, either: fireworks don't kill the FM. they're an invaluable distraction, yes, but not fatal.
by this point, Max understands now that El needs help/protection even though she has powers, but still places her faith in those powers above all else to handle the supernatural fighting. which I'd call a fairly reasonable, if sucks-to-be-El assessment.
more progress is made when El loses her powers:
this little piece of action is sooooo tasty as a bookend to the sauna scene.
this time, Max doesn't wait to see how the fight goes and then jump in for backup if needed. she takes the defensive lead this time, stepping out in front. none of these three have the physical strength to beat Billy, so she figures that as Billy's stepsister, the responsibility falls to her to try to stop him a different way. doesn't work even a little bit, but, credit for the effort to defend. (Mike too, full credit for trying)
s4 Max on El's power loss
we don't know of anything Max ever said TO El regarding her power loss. but during her curse era in season 4 she's still out there wishing for El to get her powers back.
this line was a rock in my shoe for awhile because I thought Max should've grown past the solo-hero-El mindset after s3. I wish the burden wasn't always on El, and I'd like to see Max express that too, and spend more time helping think of conventional solutions instead of just relying on El's powers to save the day.
but actually I just misinterpreted the line.
she doesn't say this during the discussion about how they're gonna stop Vecna. this is specifically in reply to Nancy pointing out that they need to find a way into the UD in order to do that. so Max isn't saying she wishes El would come kill Vecna / rescue her / save the day, she's just saying she wishes El could poke a hole into the UD for them so they can do it. opening a portal is the part the kids really can't do on their own. shooting/stabbing a guy, sure.
once a gate presents itself, Max never wishes for El's help again. she volunteers as bait while the others kill Vecna, which is an entirely conventional solution.
so, this still fits a general trend away from regarding El as a solo/super hero. as always, Max looks to El for the stuff that can only be accomplished with superpowers; what's really changing is that her perception of "things that can be accomplished without superpowers" is expanding. s3 to s4 shows an enormous decrease in her reliance on El for supernatural battle.
ooh but the final step (so far) is my favorite
Max really no longer expects El to solo, even when she shows up with powers and gives explicit instructions to let her solo. ("stay back" -> so, "just stand there and watch"? mm tasty)
Max does listen, initially, but when things go south, she tries to stab Vecna in El's defense (or more realistically, tries to distract him for a second).
the interesting piece of character growth here is not that Max tries to protect El even though El has powers. that's not new.
it's the implications of Max growing past volunteering her protection unasked, all the way to insisting on protecting El even after she said not to.
a very interesting choice from little miss trust-El-who's-saved-the-world-twice.
[Regina George voice:] so you agree? it is possible for El to overestimate her own limits? and her decisions should sometimes be challenged or overridden for her own protection?
like. Max and Mike are the only ones El has ever "stay back"ed. I mean, she's fought for everybody, but they're the only two people she's ever explicitly, individually, fought instead of. are we seeing it?
are we seeing how Mike's feelings in that s3 argument had a lot to do with watching El fight the demogorgon after keeping him back for his own protection - and that the instant Max has the vaguely-equivalent experience of watching El fight Vecna after keeping her back for her own protection, her actions get a bit more Mikey?
where will this go in s5?
unless we get an amnesia plot, s5 Max ought to have a specific brand of El-loss trauma very similar to Mike's, considering she most likely died thinking El had already been killed trying to protect her. (I'm 100% sure she never saw and 90% sure she never heard El in the mind lair with her so it probably looked like she was dead or at very least "gone")
seems very safe to say s5 will require El to endanger herself in order to save Max, and I'm very eager to see how this arc plays out in terms of Max's reaction to that (will we get a scene where Max actually tries to dissuade her?) and whether we'll get any kind of madwheeler handshake type moment about that.
I'm not saying Max and Mike will or should reach equilibrium in the end, but I am enjoying that they've both ended up sliding towards the middle ground since their argument. Mike has learned to better respect El's agency and independence, and now Max has learned that sometimes she too prioritizes El's safety.
so! Max starts out all starry-eyed over El, thinking superpowers are the solution to everything, only to become more and more inclined to help and protect the girl she originally thought of as a superhero. can't tell you how much I love this progression.
.
now let's talk about Mike
unlike Max, Mike never expected El to be invincible or save the day all on her own. it might have a lot to do with first impressions (which looks like she needs taking care of: the rainsoaked nonverbal child lost in the woods, or the MTV punk who just hurled a monster through the window?)
Mike does encourage El to use her powers to find Will (after she volunteers her ability and willingness), but just the void-searching, screwing-with-electronics type stuff. he never encourages her towards telekinetic battle; she does all that unasked. he never expects her to fight for them in any way that seems to seriously endanger her. in fact, he makes effort to protect her at those times.
season 2, he worries for El when she goes off to the lab to close the gate, in contrast to Max figuring she can take care of herself. Mike formulates the plan to draw away the demodogs to make it safer for her.
season 3 is the big argument where Mike's seemingly the only one concerned for El's safety, accusing everyone of being careless with El's powers and treating her like a machine. (intriguing that the actual word "superhero" wasn't invoked in this scene)
although Max makes valid points in this argument, bias from her trust issues causes her to take her points a bit too far. the same thing is going on with Mike. he makes valid points, but has bigtime loss issues that cause him to err in the other direction (arguing El is risking her life "for no reason" when literally the world is at stake).
in fact, throughout the series, his concern for El's safety looks chiefly motivated by his own fear of loss.
"I don't want her to die looking for the flayed"
oh boy does that line tell us a lot. he says "looking for". not "fighting". y'all see the size of the can of worms?
Mike worries about her dying not in combat to save the day, but from searching the void for too long and dying from strain of power overuse. which raises the question:
if Mike is worried about power strain... shouldn't it have been a concern when she had to close the gate last year, which was 1000x more strenuous?
El's battery-drainage has been common knowledge since s1, so either:
s2 Mike didn't realize closing the gate would take lots of power (doesn't make sense; Hopper told them the gate had gotten huge), OR
is there some reason Mike would've become even more El-loss-motivated by 3 than he was in 2, even though he got to "keep" El at the end of 2?
yes! the reason is Will.
in s2, Will was in jeopardy. Mike's response to the El-gate-closing plan wasn't "oh no, El, don't! you might die or get brain damage!" it's "okaycool but let's make sure Will is safe first." when he does fret for El's safety, he specifies that it's the demodogs he's worried about. he makes no mention of power strain.
in s3 the world is at stake again, but suddenly now Mike is all "oh nooo we can't let El strain herself" regarding a comparatively extremely-low-power-intensity task (plus El is older and presumably stronger since s2). the key variable is that this time, Will is fine.
Mike has always cared about El's safety, but back when Will was at stake, he was able to overlook power strain on her as regrettable but necessary. right now, with Will's safety a non-issue, Mike is free to make El's safety his top concern, even to the point of judging all the others for acting basically like he did in s2. priorities.
anyway, back to the greater subject:
none of his behavior in the first few seasons looks much like the way someone would treat a superhero.
if Mike has always understood that El needs help and protection, why does he get all superhero-y about her by season 4?
has he grown increasingly awed by her powers as they've strengthened? is Mike's arc the inverse of Max's, with him regarding El as more of a superhero over time? I don't think that's it.
I think framing this the same way for Mike as for Max is wrong, and misses what's really neat about this contrast.
we have to think about why each of them liken El to a superhero in the first place. it's not for the same reasons.
Mike and Max admire different qualities in their favorite superheroes.
Max superhero name drop: Wonder Woman Max is a girl from a broken home who's felt abandoned, rejected, or abused by every male figure in her life, so we can see the obvious appeal in a strong, independent super-woman. (isn't WW's Lasso of Truth also just what a girl with trust issues would want?)
things like relative invincibility (I know WW isn't literally invincible but like, compared to a regular person), female independence, and ability to defend herself (esp from men) are defining superhero qualities to Max because they're a mix of what she has to be, and what she wishes she could be. she probably imagines that if she were WW, she wouldn't have to worry about anyone or anything that's making her life suck the way it does. WW is MM upside down. coincidence????? (yes)
that's what Max thought El was, early on, hence genuinely thinking El could take care of herself in the sauna.
so does Max just stop thinking of El as a superhero? not necessarily in every sense. right around the time Max is letting go of those preconceptions, another El-WW commonality becomes evident: El helps save the world not with superpowers, but with compassion for Billy.
a mainstay of the Wonder Woman character is the dichotomy of her dominant force aspect and her nurturing humanity: her overwhelming belief in love, empathy, compassion, and having a strong conscience.
I'm not sure whether to think El told anybody how she got through to Billy at the end. but if Max does know, then there are still Wonder Womanly things for her to admire about El's actual character, even if she doesn't think of her as a superhero anymore in the defining sense.
Mike superhero name drop: Superman invincibility is more of a Superman thing, but not one I see evidence that Mike esteems in Supes, wishes for himself, or expects from El.
the qualities I figure Mike admires in Superman are evidenced by the ones that reflect in his own character: things like loyalty, protectiveness, strong sense of justice. nobody thinks his powers aren't cool, but I sense the real allure for Mike is the way Superman uses those powers for good. that's how Mike would use powers if he had any.
I think such qualities are also what he likes about El. I'm giving him a huge benefit of doubt here, because he hasn't made this clear textually. but in the monologue, I see now how he's calling her a superhero for her character, not her actual powers. he admires her for her loyalty to her friends, her commitment to fighting for good, her constant choice of love over hate - all that jazz. stuff that really does apply with or without her powers.
Mike superhero name drop: X-Men when Lucas says El is a "weirdo, not a superhero" Mike doesn't deny her weirdo-ness, he defends it, in other words saying someone can be both.
the X-Men are outcasts due to genetic mutations, so their appeal is obvious among a group of nerds who are bullied and called freaks over a variety of prejudices. through an X-Men lens, Mike can find strength in the discrimination and struggle to fit in which the party faces in real life.
this all applies to El too, who faces definite struggles from not fitting in, getting bullied and called a freak as well.
two indicators that Mike meant it specifically in an X-Men way when he called El a superhero during their fight:
one: this conversation started with her talking about how she is different, doesn't belong, and everyone thinks she's a monster.
two, Mike's word choice. he's already referenced his bullying, but his use of "mouth breather," a s1 throwback word referring to Troy ("I was tripped by this mouth breather Troy") links his thought process back to the X-Men conversation specifically (which took place on the heels of Troy bullying the party).
Mike didn't call her a superhero like "they don't have telekinesis and you do, so you rule and they drool!" he meant "yes you are different from everybody else, and I know that sucks a lot of the time, but the way you use your unique qualities to fight evil is what makes you awesome, like the X-Men!"
Mike superhero name drop: Mister Fantastic
the first person whose superpowers Mike praises isn't El. it's Dustin! he thinks the hyper-flexibility Dustin gets bullied for is cool, kind of like the stretching powers of Mister Fantastic.
I don't know Mister Fantastic so I had to look up what his deal is, and was intrigued to find this:
.. although his cosmic ray powers are primarily stretching abilities, his presence on the Fantastic Four team is defined by his scientific acumen, as he is officially acknowledged as the smartest man in the Marvel Universe.
rather reminiscent of Dustin, the genius child who's always explaining magnets and the plot to everyone else? looks like his "superpower" is not the only reason Mike likens Dustin to Mister Fantastic. just like El's isn't the only reason he likens her to Superman.
anyway, Mike thinking of El as a superhero isn't the problem per se. the problem is him never articulating that he doesn't mean it in the hurtful way
Mike's had two big scenes where he REALLY needed to make this clear to El, and didn't (if I'm even on the right track here).
El doesn't know jack about superheroes except that they have powers, so when Mike calls her that, she has no idea he could be referring to anything other than her powers. you can't tell me she ever read a comic for him or listened to him talk about Superman. I can't remember El ever even politely feigning interest in Mike's interests.
the only time she's ever listened to anyone lore dump about superheroes was Max about Wonder Woman, and if my above reading is accurate, early s3 Max probably focused on superpowers more than character.
the closest we ever came to E listening to Mike talk about a "superhero" he likes is:
it's not like he extolled Yoda's bravery or anything. just telekinesis. so it's little wonder what her takeaway is here. all she has to go by is what he says out loud.
and when Mike reassures her, unprompted, that she'll get her powers back at the end of s3, it just reinforces her notion that telekinesis is really important to him.
when actually, I think Mike just says that because it's important to her. she's lost a part of herself and he wants her to feel whole. (whether El truly wants her powers back for her own sake or because she fears she's not valuable to others without them is another conversation - point here is, Mike saw her try, fail, and look upset about it, so he reassures her.)
ps, I do like how reaching that teddy bear for her serves as a micro illustration of the way he's willing to help reach goals in conventional ways instead of relying on her powers.
but yeah, again, clearly she thinks he means her powers when he calls her a superhero and she answers "not anymore".
which leads to a question I've yelled at the tv more than once: why didn't he just clarify as soon as El said "not anymore"? this whole thing could've been nipped in the bud?
I think he doesn't even realize the miscommunication.
his intent with the superhero "compliment" might just be so obvious to him that he doesn't realize it needs clarification for her.
"but how could he miss the miscommunication? what else than her lost powers could she mean by "not anymore"?" maybe Mike thinks she DOES already understand that he means the superhero thing in terms of admirable character. so, when she says "not anymore", maybe he thinks she's referring not to her lost powers, but to her lost standing in his eyes since hitting Angela?
I've pondered before about how maybe Mike's admiration of El's Supermanly "unwavering moral code" is why he was so upset that it apparently wavered after Rinkomania.
he didn't say anything to clarify after "not anymore" because he is still sorting out those feelings.
I'm not sure Mike realizes even after the "I have gone to become a superhero again" note (which he reads after finding out El is in training to get her powers back).
his reaction to the note isn't "oh no, I didn't mean superhero like that!" but rather seems all about his regret about El leaving him behind as a result of his failure to force an "I love you". (ah, the old fear of loss disguised as romantic love again)
I don't believe he'd fail to apologize/clarify if he realized the way that this hurt El. he can be an ass, he can be stupid, but he does reliably own up to his mistakes and apologize.
I used to think the "with/without your powers" line in the monologue meant he was aware of the miscommunication, and was trying to clarify. but he did such a bad job clarifying that it makes a lot more sense if he actually still hasn't clocked the issue at all. I gotta think he couldn't have been dumb enough to say the superhero thing again unless he still didn't get how it was hurtful in the first place.
he does have El on a pedestal. it's just not because of her powers.
the monologue is largely selfish, and doesn't land well for El, but it's not the worship-of-superpowers Mike is so often accused of. he's locked onto the "I love you" thing, caught up in his own fear of loss, and completely missing the optics for her.
the superhero thing can be cleared up with a single conversation. the true underlying issue, which would still persist, is this "extraordinary vs. ordinary" dynamic in his mind which isn't serving either of them well. he's got low self esteem from viewing himself as some useless loser compared to her; and the last thing she wants is another guy considering her extraordinary, which has been a horrific liability all her life, and she just wants normalcy.
reason #7519 why 🦴.
in conclusion: Mike and Max having different Super-El arcs is the good arc for both of them
as Max sees El needing protection, she comes to realize that powers don't grant the kind of freedom/safety that she daydreamed would go along with being a superhero in real life. so for Max to decreasingly regard El as a superhero is a positive thing.
as Mike sees El continue to loyally fight against ever-greater forces of evil and the social struggles that come with her uniqueness, he continues to admire the same qualities in her that define his favorite superheroes. so for Mike to still/increasingly regard El as a superhero is a... well-intentioned, potentially positive thing. (it can be, if he takes her off the pedestal and explains this in a way she can understand.)
#mike wheeler#max mayfield#anyone who tags this 'same person different fonts' will be fined five dollars btw#givehimthemedicine analysis#character analysis#I had to watch the monologue for this post. it's been a while#I understand better now but at what cost#admiring qualities of your friends' personalities is good. Mike can and should still do that. he just needs to say that's what he's doing#because it's so easy to come off as Brennery to her otherwise
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
Eiktyrne Småfat 2012/2016 #1045 (51 %)
Det norske brenneri i Grimstad har produsert whisky siden 2009, men er kanskje like mye kjent for akevitt og gin så langt. Denne whiskyen ble destillert den 4.7.2012 og tappet den 2.3.2016; den har ligget på et lite cognacfat (40 liter) som ga 69 flasker. Før cognacfatet lå den på et eks-sherryfat.
På nesen fikk jeg vått korn, råsprit, sagmugg, litt anis og gummi, vanilje og sjokolade. Smaksmessig fikk jeg malt, litt karamell, eiketre, krydder og trebitterhet. Avslutningen var preget av trebitterhet, litt mentol og karamell. Middels lang. Med vann kom det til mer treverk på nesen, malt og et hint av appelsinskall. Smaken fikk et tydeligere spritstikk, med krydder og sitrus. Avslutningen ble bitrere og kortere.
Nyere destillerier har en tendens til å eksperimentere en del med små fat; noen ganger lykkes det, andre ganger kan det være riktig så motbydelig. Dette er vel et sted midt imellom for min del. Helt ok, men ikke veldig mye mer; som man kan forvente av en tre år gammel whisky med ekspresslagring på et minifat, kanskje. Det kunne utvilsomt vært verre.
Karakter: 77/100
(Takk til Kjartan!)
0 notes
Note
brennery or creelarke?
In canon? Always creelarke, no question.
Brenner and Henry in canon are like…equivalent to watching The Passion of The Christ. Great narratively, but awful emotionally, and you can’t exactly look away because it’s lowkey entrancing in a way that makes you a little sick to your stomach.
Creelarke are the sad, separated gay boy besties. It’s got that wholesome kick to it that would be really good irt Henry’s character, and it’s got that sweet sweet ability to tie Scott directly into the supernatural plot (which they’ve been slowly doing for years now).
In fanon? They both have their own brand of like. pure crack cocaine.
Creelarke is great in how wholesome it is, just based on who Henry and Scott are as people. Because of that, though, there’s a whole section of stories that just won’t work for them (darkfics, whump, hurt no comfort, etc. where one half of the ship is the perpetrator against the other half). Most conflict that would arise between them would be borne of a mistake or a trauma response on Henry’s side, and that doesn’t have the same Flavour.
Brennry isn’t constrained by that because Brenner is canonically not a good person/does not treat Henry well. A dark fic would not be outside of his characterization, nor would it be outside Henry’s re: a revenge plot. Brenner does have enough weird “I loved the children, yes, even Henry” in his character, though, that it can be molded into something more wholesome, especially when paired with Henry’s core goodness as a character.
It’s not part of the question, but I think I should mention hopcreel, (Jim and Henry). I’ve been talking about that one since the audition tapes for TFS came out in early 2023 >:3 It has the best of both worlds because a) Jim can be an unabashed asshole sometimes (and a bit of a slob), which would definitely rankle Henry, and b) Henry can be a bit neurotic, which would definitely frustrate Jim. Some degree of intentional conflict can arise while still maintaining an “unproblematic” ship.
So like…there’s nuance in all of it, but Creelarke is the only one I’m angling for as a potentially canon ship.
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
thank you for tagging me @vcaudley! back from holidays so time to get back into things :)
A scent you love: jasmine!
What's something you're looking forward to this week? my friend is hositng a starfinder game tomorrow and i'm excited to start playing! my character is a very nervous brenneri (otter-esque humanoid) and i love him. his name is safety pin.
What's a book you're currently reading? i am finally reading little women! i haven't really read a lot of classics for fun since university, so i thought that since i loved the film so much (and planning on watching the 1994 and 2017 adaptions) i would get the book on my kindle. have been tearing through it on the trains and so far adoring it.
What's a game you're currently playing? i am working my way (still) through assassin's creed: valhalla. with games, i do have to limit myself with times because i am apt to spend hours on them and forget that i should be doing other things, oops.
What's the most recent movie you watched? i watched the perfect find on netflix last night. absolutely do not recommend. it could have been so good, had workplace romance, age gaps, mid-life crises, and yet... i'm not an advocate for 3 hour movies, but i felt like this movie needed at least another hour to answer all the questions i had.
Are you watching anything on TV or listening to any shows? i have two shows i want to watch - good omens season 2 and heartstopper. i have been dodging spoilers like nothing on earth these past few days and i think i have to just turn my phone off and watch asap. i'm listening to the off menu podcast at the moment, surprisingly really engaging since i adore james acaster.
Favourite season? - autumn. dear god i cannot wait for the proper weather to wear cute outfits and jumpers. i would have enjoyed summer more if it hadn't been raining 24/7, but all it's doing is making me crave september.
What's something you've learned recently? i found out from a podcast recently that people actually live full time on cruise ships. not particularly mind-blowing, but it was to me. what do you mean you've turned travelling on the sea, not seeing land for multiple weeks at a time, the inherent homoeroticism of the bond between you and your crewmates, into something so entirely boring??
Have you had any water lately? yes i have, i am trying to fend off a cold and drowning the germs in the finest british tap water.
gently tagging: @sarah-sandwich-writes, @fleurtygurl and @silvertalonwritblr! hope you have more exciting facts than me
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Pervasive conservation of intron number and other genetic elements revealed by a chromosome-level genomic assembly of the hyper-polymorphic nematode Caenorhabditis brenneri
http://dlvr.it/T8wqX8
0 notes
Text
The Caenorhabditis #RNA-seq Browser – a web-based application for on-demand analysis of publicly available Caenorhabditis spp. bulk #RNA-sequencing data
The Caenorhabditis #RNA-seq Browser is an open-source Shiny web app that enables on-demand visualization and quantification of bulk #RNA-sequencing data for five Caenorhabditis species: C. elegans, C. briggsae, C. brenneri, C. japonica, and C. remanei... https://www.rna-seqblog.com/the-caenorhabditis-rna-seq-browser-a-web-based-application-for-on-demand-analysis-of-publicly-available-caenorhabditis-spp-bulk-rna-sequencing-data/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
Text
Technically a starfinder commission, but really just my buddy forcing me to draw him as a hypebeast furry smh
119 notes
·
View notes
Photo
After playing a basic character for my first campaign in years. I played in a Starfinder campaign. Here is Pema, My Solarian Brenneri
5 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Toon Ryder makes a splash!
#Ryder#cartoon#style#toon#otter#brenneri#Starfinder#sword#relax#anime#bento#female characters#Furry Art#cosmopunk#ysoki
68 notes
·
View notes
Text
The realisation that if you want artwork of one of your characters in Starfinder, you're probably going to have to commission a furry artist.
#she's a Brenneri#which are otter people#and I want art of her#but I'm bad at art#and people that are good at drawing anthro animals are almost exclusively furry artists#but in saying that#if you know someone who does like more gritty sci fi anthropomorphic animal art hmu#my art is potat tho
1 note
·
View note
Link
0 notes
Text
starting a new starfinder campaign and im a brenneri <3
1 note
·
View note
Text
Eiktyrne Quadruple Batch II (52,5 %)
Eiktyrne er maltwhisky fra Det Norske Brenneri i Grimstad, og nå i november kommer Quadruple batch II på polet. Dette er whisky fra fire forskjellige fat: American virgin (225 liter), bloodtub olorosofat (40 liter), brandy (300 liter), Jerez de la Frontera PX (500 l). Alderen er ikke oppgitt, men dette er ikke gamle greiene vil jeg tro, 3–4 år antagelig. Det er tappet 892 flasker (á 50 cl).
På nesen: malt, vanilje, litt sjokolade, svisker, pasjonsfrukt, bakt eple, treolje og et hint av mentol. Smaksmessig fant jeg malt, litt karamell, vanilje, litt bringebær, røde epler og litt hermetisert pære. Søt. I avslutningen fikk jeg malt, røde epler, en anelse brent karamell og/eller svidd malt, og litt krydder. Søt. Med litt vann tilsatt kom det mer malt på nesen, litt kanel, røde epler stadig, eiketre og et lite hint av råsprit. Smaken fikk et hint av fennikel nå, og mer eiketre. Stadig en ganske søt munnfølelse. Avslutningen fikk mer krydder, mer røde epler, vanilje, og et hint av sitrus. Litt tørrere, men den var stadig forholdsvis søt.
En svært bra whisky for alderen! Kompleks og interessant, og mye smak og utvikling i glasset – alderen til tross tror jeg faktisk ikke denne burde ha ligget så veldig mye lenger. Bloodtub-fatet som tidligere inneholdt sherry, drar antagelig en del av lasset her. Særlig avslutningen pleier å rakne litt i veldig unge whiskyer synes jeg, men her er også den godt utviklet og integrert, og faktisk litt Glenfarclas-aktig, med det litt svidde karamellpreget. Den klart beste Eiktyrne-tapningen jeg har smakt så langt.
Karakter: 86/100
Denne omtalen er basert på en smaksprøve som ble mottatt gratis. Ingen har betalt meg for å skrive denne omtalen, og heller ikke lagt noen føringer for hva jeg skriver eller stilt krav om at jeg skal skrive noe i det hele tatt.
0 notes
Text
Norsk kaffeteknologi i verdenstoppen
https://www.y6.no/norsk-kaffeteknologi-i-verdenstoppen/
Norsk kaffeteknologi i verdenstoppen
Dato: 23-06-2020 10:44 CEST Opprinnelig tittel på pressemeldingen: Norsk kaffeteknologi i verdenstoppen Kategori: , kaffebrenning Den prisvinnende norske prøvebrenneren Roest har vakt internasjonal oppmerksomhet. Nå lanseres en ny funksjon som registrerer kaffebønnenes «første crack» og avslutter brenningen automatisk. Dette er de alene om i verden.
Den prisvinnende norske prøvebrenneren Roest har vakt internasjonal oppmerksomhet. Nå lanseres en ny funksjon som registrerer kaffebønnenes «første crack» og avslutter brenningen automatisk. Dette er de alene om i verden.
På kaffebrenneriet forvandles råkaffe til velduftende brune bønner, klar for maling og tilberedning. Å brenne kaffen riktig er ikke preget av tilfeldigheter. Før man bestemmer seg for brenneprofil har man vurdert bønnene opprinnelse og egenskaper. Et viktig hjelpemiddel er prøvebrenneren. Med denne kan man brenne små mengder, variere på tid og temperatur helt til man er fornøyd. Så skal det gjenskapes på den store brenneren.
Lytter etter første crack
Lyd er en god indikator på bønnetemperatur under brenning. Det er to temperaturterskler kalt «cracks» som brenneren lytter til. Først vil bønnene sprake som popcorn gjør når det popper, bare roligere. Dette punktet kalles «first crack», og markerer begynnelsen på lysbrenningen. Bønnene har da øket størrelsen med 50%. Når bønnene er medium brent avgir de et «second crack.» Dette er midtpunktet mellom medium og mørk brenning. Mellom første og andre crack ligger de fleste brennerier i Norge.
Røst Coffee har, i samarbeid med universitet i Texas og et annet norsk oppstartsselskap, utviklet teknologi for å lytte etter first crack.
– Dette gir brukeren mer informasjon og det gjør også at kaffebrenneren kan avslutte brenningen automatisk til korrekt tid, forklarer Trond Simonsen. Han og broren Sverre står bak prøvebrenneren. – Dette vil våre kunder kunne spare store ressurser på, da operatøren ikke trenger å følge med under brenneprosessen lenger. Roest er først i verden med dette.
Støtte fra Innovasjon Norge
Trond og Sverre Simonsen er fra Kristiansund. Sverre er sivilingeniør fra NTNU, mens Trond er siviløkonom. Prosjektet startet som en masteroppgave, der planen var å lage en kaffebrenner for hjemmemarkedet. Etter en demonstrasjon for Tim Wendelboe og Morten Wennersgaard høsten 2013, gikk diskusjonen over på prøvebrennere, hvor det hadde skjedd lite utvikling de siste 50 årene.
Litt senere på kvelden hadde Sverre tegnet en grov produktskisse. Et halvt år senere sikret de etablererstøtte gjennom Innovasjon Norge og fikk produsert prototype 1.
Kunder i 50 land
Kundene befinner seg over hele verden med USA, Tyskland og Australia som de største markedene. Asia er på vei opp med utprøving av distribusjonsavtaler i Sør Korea og Thailand. Selskapet forventer å signere distribusjonsavtaler for flere land i løpet av andre halvdel av 2020.
Brenneren koster 5.500 euro, og 98 prosent av salget er utenfor Norge.
– Kundene finner vi blant kaffebrennerier, kafeer og kaffeeksportører, men også kaffeinteresserte privatkunder, sier Sverre.
Kontakt
Trond Simonsen Røst Coffee Tøyengt. 29c 0578 Oslo
[email protected] www.roestcoffee.com
Kilde: Pressekontor Norsk Kaffeinformasjon – PRESSEMELDING –
————
Norsk Kaffeinformasjon er et opplysningskontor for kaffe. Vårt formål er å arbeide for et høyest mulig kvalitetsnivå på kaffe i Norge i alle ledd, både på den ferdig brente råvaren vi kjøper i butikken, og på det ferdige brygget i kaffekoppen i hjem og på utesteder. Norsk Kaffeinformasjon er samtidig den norske fellesorganisasjonen for alle som arbeider med kaffe og kafferelaterte virksomheter. Kontoret fremmer kaffe som kvalitetsprodukt og er næringens nøytrale faginstans. Informasjonskontoret ble opprettet i 1962.
Hashtags: # #kaffebrenning kaffebrenning
0 notes
Text
There’s a new squid in town
Researchers in OIST’s Molecular Genetics Unit, in collaboration with a researcher from Australia, have identified a new species of bobtail squid inhabiting Okinawa’s waters — dubbed Euprymna brenneri. The scientists’ findings, published in Communications Biology, highlight the rich biodiversity in the seas near Okinawa, and may shed light on the genes, behavior, and development of bobtail squid. There’s a new squid in town syndicated from https://triviaqaweb.blogspot.com/
0 notes