#berlinsky

[dtpnews]

Eyes Global - di Claire Berlinsky

Ho cercato di inviarti un’edizione di Global Eyes per tre giorni di lavoro completo, ma alla fine di ogni giorno, mi sono reso conto con sgomento che non era ancora fatto e sono andato a letto pensando che avrei dovuto finirlo al mattino. Poi mi sono svegliato per vedere quella metà di ciò che avevo incluso il giorno prima era già stata superata dagli eventi. Il ritmo delle notizie ora sfida la…

[preporodbn]

ISELJAVANJE BOŠNJAKA U TURSKU

Uvod U Berlinu je od 13. juna do 13. jula 1878. godine, pod pokroviteljstvom carevine Njemačke i pod predsjedavanjem njenog prvog bundes kancelara Ota von Bizmarka, održan kongres velikih sila. Odluke tog kongresa su za duže vrijeme odredile sudbinu naše domovine. Razlog za održavanje Berlinskog kongresa je bilo veliko nezadovoljstvo zapadnih sila, prvenstveno Velike Britanije i Austro-Ugarske,…

[preacherman316]

Not All Scientists are Evolutionists

Not long ago my Canadian facebook friend, Rob DE Man, posted a quote from the renowned physicist, David Berlinski. It’s from his book “The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions.” Berlinski, who appeared in Ben Stein’s 2008 documentary, Expelled, which exposed the silencing of educators who questioned the theory of macro evolution, has long been a fierce opponent of the…

[mariacallous]

In a product demo last week, OpenAI showcased a synthetic but expressive voice for ChatGPT called “Sky” that reminded many viewers of the flirty AI girlfriend Samantha played by Scarlett Johansson in the 2013 film Her. One of those viewers was Johansson herself, who promptly hired legal counsel and sent letters to OpenAI demanding an explanation, according to a statement released later. In response, the company on Sunday halted use of Sky and published a blog post insisting that it “is not an imitation of Scarlett Johansson but belongs to a different professional actress using her own natural speaking voice.”

Johansson’s statement, released Monday, said she was “shocked, angered, and in disbelief” by OpenAI’s demo using a voice she called “so eerily similar to mine that my closest friends and news outlets could not tell the difference.” Johansson revealed that she had turned down a request last year from the company’s CEO, Sam Altman, to voice ChatGPT and that he had reached out again two days before last week’s demo in an attempt to change her mind.

It’s unclear if Johansson plans to take additional legal action against OpenAI. Her counsel on the dispute with OpenAI is John Berlinski, a partner at Los Angeles law firm Bird Marella, who represented her in a lawsuit against Disney claiming breach of contract, settled in 2021. (OpenAI’s outside counsel working on this matter is Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati partner David Kramer, who is based in Silicon Valley and has defended Google and YouTube on copyright infringement cases.) If Johansson does pursue a claim against OpenAI, some intellectual property experts suspect it could focus on “right of publicity” laws, which protect people from having their name or likeness used without authorization.

James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and internet law at Cornell University, believes Johansson could have a good case. “You can't imitate someone else's distinctive voice to sell stuff,” he says. OpenAI declined to comment for this story, but yesterday released a statement from Altman claiming Sky “was never intended to resemble” the star, adding, “We are sorry to Ms. Johansson that we didn’t communicate better.”

Johansson’s dispute with OpenAI drew notice in part because the company is embroiled in a number of lawsuits brought by artists and writers. They allege that the company breached copyright by using creative work to train AI models without first obtaining permission. But copyright law would be unlikely to play a role for Johansson, as one cannot copyright a voice. “It would be right of publicity,” says Brian L. Frye, a professor at the University of Kentucky’s College of Law focusing on intellectual property. “She’d have no other claims.”

Several lawyers WIRED spoke with said a case Bette Midler brought against Ford Motor Company and its advertising agency Young & Rubicam in the late 1980s provides a legal precedent. After turning down the ad agency’s offers to perform one of her songs in a car commercial, Midler sued when the company hired one of her backup singers to impersonate her sound. “Ford was basically trying to profit from using her voice,” says Jennifer E. Rothman, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who wrote a 2018 book called The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public World. “Even though they didn't literally use her voice, they were instructing someone to sing in a confusingly similar manner to Midler.”

It doesn’t matter whether a person’s actual voice is used in an imitation or not, Rothman says, only whether that audio confuses listeners. In the legal system, there is a big difference between imitation and simply recording something “in the style” of someone else. “No one owns a style,” she says.

Other legal experts don’t see what OpenAI did as a clear-cut impersonation. “I think that any potential ‘right of publicity’ claim from Scarlett Johansson against OpenAI would be fairly weak given the only superficial similarity between the ‘Sky’ actress' voice and Johansson, under the relevant case law,” Colorado law professor Harry Surden wrote on X on Tuesday. Frye, too, has doubts. “OpenAI didn’t say or even imply it was offering the real Scarlett Johansson, only a simulation. If it used her name or image to advertise its product, that would be a right-of-publicity problem. But merely cloning the sound of her voice probably isn’t,” he says.

But that doesn’t mean OpenAI is necessarily in the clear. “Juries are unpredictable,” Surden added.

Frye is also uncertain how any case might play out, because he says right of publicity is a fairly “esoteric” area of law. There are no federal right-of-publicity laws in the United States, only a patchwork of state statutes. “It’s a mess,” he says, although Johansson could bring a suit in California, which has fairly robust right-of-publicity laws.

OpenAI’s chances of defending a right-of-publicity suit could be weakened by a one-word post on X—“her”—from Sam Altman on the day of last week’s demo. It was widely interpreted as a reference to Her and Johansson’s performance. “It feels like AI from the movies,” Altman wrote in a blog post that day.

To Grimmelmann at Cornell, those references weaken any potential defense OpenAI might mount claiming the situation is all a big coincidence. “They intentionally invited the public to make the identification between Sky and Samantha. That's not a good look,” Grimmelmann says. “I wonder whether a lawyer reviewed Altman's ‘her’ tweet.” Combined with Johansson’s revelations that the company had indeed attempted to get her to provide a voice for its chatbots—twice over—OpenAI’s insistence that Sky is not meant to resemble Samantha is difficult for some to believe.

“It was a boneheaded move,” says David Herlihy, a copyright lawyer and music industry professor at Northeastern University. “A miscalculation.”

Other lawyers see OpenAI’s behavior as so manifestly goofy they suspect the whole scandal might be a deliberate stunt—that OpenAI judged that it could trigger controversy by going forward with a sound-alike after Johansson declined to participate but that the attention it would receive from seemed to outweigh any consequences. “What’s the point? I say it’s publicity,” says Purvi Patel Albers, a partner at the law firm Haynes Boone who often takes intellectual property cases. “The only compelling reason—maybe I’m giving them too much credit—is that everyone’s talking about them now, aren’t they?”

[santoschristos]

Vessel of the Cosmic Eye

Santiago Licata

“Within the blink of a cosmic eye, a universe in which all was chaos and void came to include hunches, beliefs, sentiments, raw sensations, pains, emotions, wishes, ideas, images, inferences, the feel of rubber, Schadenfreude, and the taste of banana ice cream.”

--David Berlinski, The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions

[lesser-known-composers]

Alexander Borodin (1833-1887) - String Quartet No 1 in A

Borodin Quartet : Mikhail Kopelman, Andrei Abramenkov, Dimitri Shebalin, Valentin Berlinsky

[prasa-koval]

30) City Journal - magazyn poświęcony polityce publicznej i witryna internetowa, wydawany przez konserwatywny think tank Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, który porusza szereg tematów dotyczących spraw miejskich, takich jak policja, edukacja, mieszkalnictwo i inne kwestie. Czasopismo publikuje również artykuły na temat sztuki i kultury, architektury miejskiej, kultury rodzinnej i innych zagadnień. Czasopismo zaczęło ukazywać się w 1990 roku.

City Journal został założony w 1990 roku przez Richarda Vigilante, dyrektora redakcyjnego Manhattan Institute, który pełnił również funkcję pierwszego redaktora magazynu. Vigilante pierwotnie chciał uruchomić magazyn jako przedsięwzięcie nastawione na zysk, ale ostatecznie przekonał Williama M. H. Hammetta, szefa konserwatywnego Manhattan Institute do przyjęcia projektu. Vigilante pozycjonował City Journal jako bardziej umiarkowaną i bardziej kosmopolityczną alternatywę dla ugruntowanych prawicowych instytucji. Magazyn początkowo publikował artykuły promujące prywatyzację, dyscyplinę fiskalną, redukcję zatrudnienia w rządzie i bony edukacyjne. Inne tematy związane z Nowym Jorkiem poruszane w magazynie obejmowały krytykę otwartej rekrutacji na CUNY i promowanie policji „wybijającej szyby”.

Na początku lat dwudziestych XXI wieku czasopismo City Journal przyciągnęło powszechną uwagę w kraju ze względu na swoją rolę w podnoszeniu poziomu debat na temat krytycznej teorii rasy, tematów LGBTQ+ w edukacji i podobnych kwestii w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Szczególnie popularny stał się współpracownik Christopher Rufo, który napisał wiele artykułów do czasopisma, często skupiających się na tych kwestiach. W artykułach opublikowanych w City Journal, Rufo oskarżył Biuro Praw Obywatelskich w Seattle o „popieranie zasad segregacjonizmu, poczucia winy opartego na grupie i esencjalizmu rasowego”; zwrócił uwagę na pracowników Disneya i Twittera skazanych za wykorzystywanie seksualne dzieci; zasugerował, że w szkołach publicznych występuje znaczny poziom „przygotowywania”, pomijając przy tym, że cytowane przez niego badanie wykazało, że „ogromna większość” amerykańskich szkół jest bezpieczna; oskarżył kalifornijskiego projektanta programów nauczania o chęć zmuszenia dzieci do „śpiewania pieśni ku czci bogów Quetzalcoatl, Huitzilopochtli i Xipe Totek” — stan Kalifornia zapłacił później 100 000 dolarów honorariów prawnych i zgodził się usunąć pieśni ku czci bogów azteckich; i porównał szkolenie na temat różnorodności przeprowadzone przez miasto Seattle do „programowania kultowego”.

Czasopismo jest wydawane przez konserwatywny Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, krajowy wolnorynkowy think tank z siedzibą w Nowym Jorku. Redagowali je Richard Vigilante, a następnie Fred Siegel na początku lat 90. Myron Magnet, redaktor w latach 1994–2006, jest obecnie redaktorem naczelnym. Obecnym redaktorem City Journal jest Brian C. Anderson, który został mianowany pod koniec 2006 r. po 10 latach pełnienia funkcji starszego redaktora. Wśród współpracowników czasopisma znajdują się eksperci, tacy jak starszy pracownik naukowy Heather Mac Donald, Edward Glaeser, Steven Malanga, Nicole Gelinas, Kay Hymowitz, John Tierney i Joel Kotkin. Chociaż City Journal ma siedzibę w Nowym Jorku, jego zasięg jest krajowy, a często międzynarodowy, dzięki wkładowi autorów, w tym Theodore'a Dalrymple'a z Wielkiej Brytanii, Claire Berlinski i Guya Sormana z Francji oraz Bruce'a Bawera z Norwegii.

Większość odbioru City Journal na przestrzeni lat była podzielona według linii politycznych. Konserwatywny komentator Jay Nordlinger, pisząc w National Review, nazwał City Journal „latarnią cywilizacji”. W 2016 r. City Journal zajął drugie miejsce na liście „20 najlepszych witryn urbanistycznych” Global Grid i ponownie znalazł się na liście w 2017 r., zajmując czwarte miejsce. Alice O'Connor, profesor na Uniwersytecie Kalifornijskim w Santa Barbara, napisała, że ​​City Journal „nie jest wzorem ideologicznego umiarkowania”, a jego współpracownicy są „uwikłani w urbanistykę lat 60. i 70. XX wieku”.  Krytykowała wielu autorów City Journal za przywracanie „nieustępliwie negatywnego obrazu czarnej patologii kulturowej w celu wezwania do podjęcia surowszych środków w celu ukrócenia urodzeń pozamałżeńskich”, po artykułach chwalących książkę Daniela P. Moynihana The Negro Family: The Case For National Action.  Konserwatywny autor Sol Stern, główny współpracownik magazynu od momentu jego powstania,  opublikował artykuł w liberalnym czasopiśmie Democracy w 2020 r., oskarżając City Journal o odebranie niezależności redakcyjnej współpracowników i krytykując związek powierniczki magazynu Rebeki Mercer z prawicowym portalem Breitbart.

Znani współpracownicy:

Brian C. Anderson - redaktor City Journal

Steven Malanga - starszy pracownik naukowy i redaktor naczelny

Claire Berlinski - współpracowniczka

Coleman Hughes - redaktor współpracujący

Theodore Dalrymple - redaktor współpracujący

Edward Glaeser - starszy pracownik naukowy i redaktor współpracujący w City Journal

Victor Davis Hanson - redaktor współpracujący

Howard Husock - współpracownik

Kay Hymowitz - starszy pracownik naukowy i redaktor współpracujący w City Journal

Andrew Klavan - redaktor współpracujący

Joel Kotkin - współpracownik

John Leo - współpracownik

Heather Mac Donald - starszy pracownik naukowy i redaktor współpracujący

Myron Magnet - redaktor naczelny

John O. McGinnis - współpracownik

Judith Miller - adiunkt i redaktor współpracujący

Lance Morrow - współpracownik

Ian Penman - współpracownik

Fred Siegel - starszy pracownik naukowy i redaktor współpracujący w City Journal

Guy Sorman - redaktor współpracujący

Harry Stein - redaktor współpracujący

Sol Stern - adiunkt i redaktor współpracujący

John Tierney - redaktor współpracujący

Michael J. Totten - współpracownik

John Stossel - współpracownik wideo.

[king-hussein-al-bukhari-18-green]

People of Berlin, these satellites are C5N, Komona, Simut, Berlinski, Sermeciak, Bobby, and this is garbage that was trampled on. This is their whole story, Berlin. There are 9 days left.🙂

[bloodstaineddarling]

september 2024 book wrap up

The Girl Who Slept with God by Val Berlinski ☆☆☆☆☆

Sunburn by Chloe Michelle Howarth ☆☆☆☆☆

Let's be honest: I'm not going to read anything else this month, so let's just wrap it up.

There are just two books—two really good books. Both 5/5 added to favorites. Incredible, showstopping, immaculate, amazing, etc.

I honestly don't have much to say. They both broke me. The amount of things I underlined is insane. Go read it.

Sunburn... I have no words. I saw a TikTok recently that it's kind of like normal people but for lesbians and I can see it. I looooved the way it was written. Absolutely beautiful. Read it!

I wish I had more to say about those but I don't sorry.

[futuramb]

The New Caesars Part I

The advent of the Internet has also given the New Caesars something their predecessors could not have hoped to have: the ability to bypass or marginalize traditional custodians and gatekeepers of public knowledge—the established media, academia, and other authority figures—without imprisoning or killing all that many of them.

Claire Berlinski call this new class of authoritarian leaders the New Caesars and not fascist because the term fascist is historically incorrect. A agree with this and much of her analysis even if I think we need to find a better term for them.

The New Caesars Part I

[math1089]

Age Calculation Trick - Calculate your age in Seconds!

The nature of mathematics itself is in a certain sense eternal, and that’s why it’s so closely connected to the notion of time and age. David Berlinski Welcome to the blog Math1089 – Mathematics for All. Imagine a scenario where you want to guess someone’s age, but instead of asking directly, you use a clever mathematical trick. This trick will allow you to calculate their age based on their…

[themonsterp]

The idea that science is the only way to understand the world is itself a piece of dogma.— David Berlinski

[radiogornjigrad]

Romano Belković: 🆉🅸🅴🅶🆁🅽🅸🅺 A 🅴🅵🅴🅺🆃

🆉🅸🅴🅶🆁🅽🅸🅺 🅴🅵🅴🅺🆃 Zasigurno jedan od najpoznatijih našijenaca u Berlinu slikar je Lovro Artuković. Sreli smo se nedavno, na odlasku iz Berlina u Zagreb, i to je naš jedini berlinski susret. Poznajemo se kratko, par godina, a upoznali samo se prilično neobično: raspitujući se o mogućnosti kupovine njegove slike „Spavaćica“, sredinom 2006. napisao sam Lovri mail čije je sadržaj bila analiza njegova…

[fofoqueaqui]

Novela no streaming HBO Max inicia gravações de ‘Dona Beja’ com Grazi Massafera no papel principal

[doorsblacksea]

DOORS MML goes ahead in Ukraine!

On 1st of September, DOORS 1st Mutual Mobilisation Learning Workshop was organised in Ukraine. 26 representatives of local stakeholders responded affirmatively to the invitation of Odessa State Environmental University (OSENU).

The goal of the first round of MML workshops was to bring together experts and users of marine products, to raise awareness and share knowledge and skills, using Responsible Research and Innovation principles. A first step in setting the scene for the introduction of DOORS SoS was made by presenting the beta version of the System of Systems.

Video: A short working demo of the Systems of Systems interface. © DOORS Black Sea

The main objective was to engage Black Sea citizens and stakeholders in highly participatory training and co-creation activities to ensure suitability of existing and future Research Infrastructure services to the Black Sea region.

Sessions include plenary expert talks, round table discussions and hand-on practical exercises to explore an effective pan-European marine data infrastructure: Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service and Euro-Argo ERIC.

Image: The workshop was led by the OSENU team including Nikolai Berlinsky, Youseff El Hadri and Mariia Slizhe. © DOORS Black Sea

The participants were trained about the functionalities and how to work on the Ocean data visualisation tool MYOCEAN PRO of the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service and how to independently obtain input data for calculations from the Argo platform using of EuroArgo Selection Tool.

The Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) workshops give a voice to regional and local stakeholders, including regional and local authorities, business or members of civil society and an “ecosystem” of stakeholders in Responsible Research and Innovation.

[kathor]

David Berlinski on Sam Harris' Philosophical Blunder