#at least by tumblr standards

[hearmeoutworthypoll]

For the ask me anything: what is YOUR taste like. What do you like. Not necessarily hear me outs, just characters you fancy:)

Dang that’s actually a good question🤔 I’m kind of all over the place tbh and I’m bad at favorites but I guess my pinned post with Lady Dimitrescu is some indication

And thanks for the ask 🥲

[idontmindifuforgetme]

friend wanted to see my tumblr, and when i told him i can’t show it to him bc it’s basically my personal diary he went “oh so I can’t see it but a bunch of strangers on tumblr can??” he literally does not get me. no one will get me like the people in my phone get me

[multifandomnonsense]

I love how unlike most fandoms, who get weird about which ship is better and picking side, the ninjago fandom was like “yeah no. We are not just picking one. Let’s all just multi ship or make them poly.”

[potato-lord-but-not]

(sees jarthur butt sex image) yeah ok i think i see why harlan blocked you

he blocked me before I started actually freaky posting on main so. jarthur butt sex is not the problem here

[menlove]

Now when did the other beatles grow from their sexism and/or abuse like acknowledge maybe but grow from it yeah no💀 Not excusing Paul’s actions back then but we’re not gonna pretend that the others are on a higher moral standing than him😭

FASDFASDF WAS THINKING THIS TOO like all love and light but george was cheating on olivia and treating like women like shit and john was strangling may pang in front of god and everyone let's not pretend any of them were good people here lmfaoooo they were all sexist douchebags and the sooner we can all get on board w this and not be like "well MY sexist douchebag was BETTER" the more peace and love and joy i will feel on planet earth

no hate to the person who left that tag but let's all take a deep look within on whether or not the beatles were good people bc the answer is a universal "WELL-"

[themoonstonechronicler]

I had a revelation

[td-brick]

I talked about this a while ago (I think) but it annoys me when people use the stupid "well if the roles were revered/if Sierra was a guy you wouldn't defend her" strawman when talking about Sierra and her relationship to Cody as if Sierra as a character would even exist if she was a guy. Her writing and how she acts is entirely driven by misogyny and the people who wrote her seeing women as more neurotic or whatever than men. And this document (which is really good and you should read) goes more in depth about how a lot of her writing and her being depicted as eager/perverted is racist as well but. yeah. And you can recognize this about her without "defending" her or whatever. Yeah she was creepy and weird but MANY other characters in td are and they don't have nearly as much discourse surrounding them as she does.

Anyways I digress... going off my first point I feel like people forget how much misogyny (and racism in sierra's case, what with her being a woc) affects how characters are perceived and written in things. Sierra's character would not be what it was if she was a white guy. You can write flawed female characters who might have traits similar to sierra without being misogynistic and its actually bad if all your female characters are 100% perfect angels because that's misogynistic in its own right. but like there are still stereotypes you have to be aware of and if someone is misogynistic and writing a female character their misogyny will show through in her writing, like sierra. Watching world tour/all stars it feels like they're not giving her any of her own charm or positive traits, it's only attached to other characters (namely cody) and when she exists on her own (barely) she's just doing stuff to make you hate her.

And in and of itself the fact that her character is literally ONLY attached to cody (or cameron in all stars) is misogynistic. She is clearly a really strong person on her own, especially in total drama. like physically she's super strong and agile, she has a good understanding of the contestants already because of watching TWO seasons of the show many times and she probably knows a lot about how the game itself works, etc. Clearly she's also good at finding information about people so she would probably know how to use certain contestants traits to her own gain (to form alliances and otherwise). But for some reason they never really elaborate on that and especially in world tour just attach her at the hip to a random guy who she drags super far through the competition without ever getting any character development of her own and its so UGHHH. And I wouldn't even have a problem with her being a huge fan of Cody in specific (although I do wish they would focus on her being a td superfan as a whole more) if they just handled it better. which they don't. and the shit with Cameron in all stars is just dumb as fuck I'm sorry I don't think I even need to elaborate on that

[ist-das-kunst-oder-kann-das-weg]

[thepunkmuppet]

decided to grow my shitty ass ratty ass hair out. gonna blame gerard way and his pesky gender when it inevitably looks god awful for a good couple months before I can start to look cool

[keeps-ache]

i'm on some sort of kick lol

[shatered-soul]

Shattered soul

[birdy-bird27]

Bruh I’m trying to make like a oc compilation post for my sideblog but like how do you make that? I want to put each characters likes and personality stuff but also the stories I made for each of them as well. how do you combine that? It’s so hard bruh I wish I could just beam the lore into viewers head when I post my artwork on there lol

[nonokoko13]

If I see someone else trying to defend Kalim/Jamil by attacking the other or their enjoyers and misreading and boiling down their characters by saying Kalim is stupid or how Jamil is the only one at fault in their situation I'll be the one overblotting. Why you pit two victims of an awful hierarchy system they weren't asked to be stuck with. Why you have to treat people who respectfully disagrees with you in something like a series or a character interpretation like they're criminals who must be shamed or punished with death. How do you play a game that relies on narrative without actually reading. Why can't you use the block/mute button instead of engaging in a conversation you know it will be unpleasant for all parts to make it a fight you want to win. And why I see so many mysoginy/misandry in a game that it's about a lot of male characters with a main character who can be the gender you imagine them to be

[theneighborhoodwatch]

whats ur beef with wh twitter

average experience scrolling thru welcome home tags on twitter:

regular fanart

misinformation

blatant misinformation

fanart for au i have no context for bc it’s from tiktok

blatant misinformation

au that looks kinda cool until i realize it exists solely to facilitate wally x y/n shenanigans - which, while not bad in and of itself, is a subject i personally have zero interest in

regular fanart

porn from guy who, despite having been given the easiest blanket excuse in the form of “all of the neighbors are adults,” can only experience arousal if at least one of them is six years old

misinformation

theorycrafting from guy who cannot let go of fnaf

guy who is probably way too young to be posting in the porn tag complaining about people posting porn in the porn tag that was created specifically for people to post porn in

misinformation

misinformation

blatant misinformation

regular fanart

more FUCKING misinformation

seriously it’s not like any of this shit is behind a paywall

au that actually features characters who aren’t wally in major roles but is wildly ooc

porn from guy who clearly is not into puppets at all, thus making the porn fail at its one job of illiciting arousal from the viewer bc of how palpable their disinterest in the subject matter is

regular fanart

regular fanart

the rare and coveted Halfway Decent Porn. check op’s profile and realize they are engaged to the kodocon guy from earlier

misinformation again

and then nobody actually talks about what the project is about unless it’s to call it an arg. which for the time being is, you guessed it, More Fucking Misinformation.

[keelanrosa]

terfs when a study shows literally anything positive about trans people/transitioning: 'hm i think this requires some fact-checking. Were those researchers REALLY unbiased? Because if they were biased this doesn't count and if they weren't knowingly biased they probably were unconsciously biased, woke media affects so much these days. Have there been any other studies on this? Because if there haven't been this could be an outlier and if there have been and they all agree that's a bit odd, why aren't there any outliers, and if there have been and any disagree we really won't know the truth until we very thoroughly analyze them all, will we? Were there enough subjects for a good sample size? Did every single subject involved stay involved through the whole study because if they didn't we should be sure nothing shady was going on resulting in people dropping out. Are we 110% sure all the subjects were fully honest and at no point were embarrassed or afraid to admit they didn't love transitioning to the people in charge of their transition? Are we 110% sure none of the subjects were manipulated into thinking they were happy with their transition? In fact we should double-check what they think with their parents, because if the subjects and their parents disagree it's probably because they've been manipulated but their cis parents have not and are very unbiased. How many autistic subjects were there because if there weren't enough then this doesn't really study the overlap between autistic and trans and if there were too many then we just don't know enough about what causes that overlap to be sure this study really explains being trans and isn't just about being autistic. How many AFAB subjects were there because if there weren't enough this is just another example of prioritizing AMAB people and ignoring the different struggles of girls and women and if there were too many how do we know sexism didn't affect the results. Was the study double-blinded? We all know double-blinded is the most reliable so if this one wasn't that's a point against it even if the thesis literally physically could not be double-blinded. Look i'm not being transphobic, i want what's best for trans people! Really! But as a person who is not trans and therefore objective in a way they cannot possibly be, i just think we should only take into account Good Science here. You want to be following science and not being manipulated or experimented upon by something unscientific, right?'

terfs when they see a study of 45 subjects so old it predates modern criteria for gender dysphoria and basically uses 'idk her parents think she's too butch', run by a guy who practiced conversion therapy, 'confirmed' by a guy who treated the significant portion of subjects who didn't follow up as all desisting, definitely in the category of 'physically cannot double-blind this', completely contradicted by multiple other studies done on actual transgender subjects, but can be kinda cited as evidence against transitioning if you ignore everything else about it: 'oOOH SEE THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKIN BOUT. SCIENCE. Just good ol' unbiased thorough analysis. I see absolutely no reason to dig any deeper on this and if you think it's wrong you're the one being unscientific. It's really a shame you've been so thoroughly brainwashed by the trans agenda and can't even accept science when you see it. Maybe now that someone has finally uncovered this long-lost study from 1985, we can make some actual progress on the whole trans problem.'

[blackheart-6]

Thank you to everyone who got me to 5000 likes!