#at least by this blog's standards...

[manga-and-stuff]

Next up: BIBLIOMANIA

Story by Obaru Art by Macchiro

Big thanks to @burnt-tomato-slush for recommending this to me

[sk3tch404]

Yandere Glam time

Metal Family content. Come on now. I know y'all have SOMETHING.

PLEASE. Im barely getting by. Starving. Famished.

If ur wondering what he's saying in the back, Glam is running on about manners/eye contact and the history of cross walks.

[prettyfuckinhot]

my honest genuine #real opinion is that anyone who's ever had a serious problem with trans men saying tranny is an ignorant asshole. There's no good reason. Any variation of "it's not about you" is just genuinely wrong. Not only is there tons of historical precedent, there's also violent modern precedent if you paid any attention to trans men at all. Arguments like "look it up on Google images!" are so stupid because using Google images as to who is affected by a transphobic slur is a very, very dumb strategy to live by. Picking out trans men as the people who's language about transphobia you want to police is a bad joke.

[incorrectsibunaquotes]

tumblr glitched and spared you all the most heated rant of my entire hoa fandom tenure

[skrunksthatwunk]

[stuck-in-the-box]

Smash

@ruthie-just-for-once

...you know usually I'd be psyched to have a girl hit on me, but this is...just awkward.

I sincerely hope this isn't towards Tinky. If so...girl, you have some serious issues. And that's coming from Hatchetfield's local sleaze.

[theneighborhoodwatch]

whats ur beef with wh twitter

average experience scrolling thru welcome home tags on twitter:

regular fanart

misinformation

blatant misinformation

fanart for au i have no context for bc it’s from tiktok

blatant misinformation

au that looks kinda cool until i realize it exists solely to facilitate wally x y/n shenanigans - which, while not bad in and of itself, is a subject i personally have zero interest in

regular fanart

porn from guy who, despite having been given the easiest blanket excuse in the form of “all of the neighbors are adults,” can only experience arousal if at least one of them is six years old

misinformation

theorycrafting from guy who cannot let go of fnaf

guy who is probably way too young to be posting in the porn tag complaining about people posting porn in the porn tag that was created specifically for people to post porn in

misinformation

misinformation

blatant misinformation

regular fanart

more FUCKING misinformation

seriously it’s not like any of this shit is behind a paywall

au that actually features characters who aren’t wally in major roles but is wildly ooc

porn from guy who clearly is not into puppets at all, thus making the porn fail at its one job of illiciting arousal from the viewer bc of how palpable their disinterest in the subject matter is

regular fanart

regular fanart

the rare and coveted Halfway Decent Porn. check op’s profile and realize they are engaged to the kodocon guy from earlier

misinformation again

and then nobody actually talks about what the project is about unless it’s to call it an arg. which for the time being is, you guessed it, More Fucking Misinformation.

[diemon]

this is not the blog for me to talk about arcane spoilers of any kind ( and i won't on here ) , but arcane makes my runeterra brain go brrrr . just imagining all the stories to be told across runeterra . . . and the little easter eggs that do pop up that you'd recognize if you know league lore . . . its so fun to see and think about . so many conflicts, factions, dramas . . . and i'm starting to see a thread where we might be headed in future series .

[btsbs]

.

[aeide-thea]

die eigentliche Frage: wie viel Duolingo muss ich noch machen, bevor ich hoffen kann, hier auf Deutsch zu schreiben?

(viel mehr, bevor ich etwas Interessantes sagen kann! aber die Katze sitzt jetzt auf mir, was nicht interessant zu hören, aber ganz angenehm zu erleben ist. 😽)

[mermaidsirennikita]

I'm not even gonna lie a chill ran through me when I realized that Kresley was making edits to the A Hunger Like No Other trade release

[danikatze]

I blocked nearly 200 spam bot blogs (or whatever you call them) yesterday and I have 200+ more to scan through now.. I feel really bad if I blocked someone who wasn't a fake blog, but I don't have the mental capacity to check whether a blog is real or not.

[waterme-stories]

My entertainment tonight is window-shopping PetFinder and scoffing at the cats listed as colorpoints.

She's sweet, but her ass is NOT a lilac point!

[the-kipsabian]

idk if you are most known for this, but in my head i think of you as a hot wrestler curator. 10/10, only the hottest wrestlers on this blog

i mean i consider my tastes to be 10/10 lmao, but i know within the fandom overall its a questionable take, but hey its all subjective tbh. so i agree only the hottest ones in this blog LMAO

[yngai]

i think there's a lot of valid critique to make of how ada's character is portrayed & written especially with capcom's misogyny & their dependance on the cool sexy female character but i genuinely don't see how the remakes "fixed" ada's character by giving her a separate story/proper character motivation when those things already existed & were pretty heavy handedly given to the audience in RE4 (she tells them to the player verbatim) + the remake separate ways draws very heavily from ada's characterization in RE6 which was actually capcom's second/better executed foray into giving ada her own unique narrative that only scantly intersects with leon's, because the original separate ways was hastily put together & its story was relegated to ada interjecting her own thoughts between chapters. i'd argue the only appearance that fails ada the most is damnation because it's a rethread of 4 with less substance but even that movie gives the audience enough hints towards ada's purpose & the imbalance in her relationship with leon + the homoerotic fight scene with svetlana that there is at least something to enjoy

[skinsort]

Hello, I've been thinking about code and selling code and sharing code in the rpc because someone posed the question to me of what I'd want to happen if someone was heavily editing a skin I sold, and to be honest, my first instinct was 'take my name off it'. That was met with some surprise, but let me explain why.

Code, to me, is a largely democratic landscape. If you want to learn, hundreds of thousands of people and websites have come together to teach you. Masses of people share open source work on codepen, stack overflow etc. Code as a skill is like assembling an especially abstract puzzle where you can only think about the pieces, not really see them. But most puzzles have similar strategies to solve- start with the corner pieces, then the edges, then the most recognizable patterns etc etc etc working your way down to the more and more difficult details. Most of code- most of my job writing code- involves minimizing the amount of time working on those shared strategies so we can have more time to work on the the interesting bits, the hard bits. the bits that make the site we're working on unique and useful. Frankly, jcink is the easy part of code, by and large. Your data is already structured and provided to you in a very particular way. It is inefficiently, but largely documented. Many other people have solved all the problems you are likely to have trying to build a skin. Skinning is html and css for the vast majority of items. It is the easy stuff. If I sell code, that code is now the property of the person I sold it to. It is not shareable or redistributable. You can't take my code and resell it as your own, but as far as I'm concerned you can do whatever you want with it. If I solved problems that might otherwise feel difficult (accessibility and responsiveness come to mind) cool. You can solve the easy ones, like styling and colors and fonts you like. You can add or subtract things that vibe with what you want that code to do. Once it is sold, it is yours to do with what you like when it comes to personal use. This is true of almost all coding contracts that exist in the entire world. If it weren't, no one would ever hire external contractors to do any work for their company, and I can tell you now, even companies which could fully afford to do all their tech in house absolutely do not in 99% of cases if their business isn't selling their own tech. The rule is generally- you may do anything you like with this, except resell it to someone else. So why take my name off it? I don't endorse how other people code. Even in my professional life, I've taken projects off my portfolio because the client took a project I worked on and broke it (imo), often with other professional developers doing the breaking. If a prospective employer were to go look at it, I'd be embarrassed by what it looks like today. Tell me why I (and my team) created a website that was fully responsive, and they went back to make it adaptive in the year of our lord 2022 because they preferred to have pixel perfect views at 3 specific breakpoints rather than a responsive site. I don't know, it's infuriating. I can't cite that project as an example of my work anymore, because it isn't. I would never leave a site in that state.

So, my first instinct with the idea of people using a skin i sell them as a base is 'take my name off it.' I don't want to be associated if responsive/accessible features are lost due to others working on a skin I wrote. But at the same time, where is the line between using something as a base, and editing a few small features? I certainly don't want to be an arbiter of that, or have to field questions or navigate feelings about it. In fact, personally I would not feel upset at all if someone used a paid for skin as a base, and inviting that kind of discussion is the only way I possibly could get upset since people have weird attitudes about a lot of this stuff. So I think the more practical standard is just to put credit, but make it explicit that the work has been heavily altered. Don't resell or redistribute, and you're golden, imo. Anyway, those are my feelings as someone who writes code for a living. I'm interested to hear counterpoints - constructively of course.