#ask ai

[iaskaisearchengine]

[evelovestar]

Valentine's Day is pagan! I asked ChatGPT about the origin of Valentine's celebration.

Dear Lovestar, I have done this new thing again and I hope you don’t mind it. I have talked to AI. By the way, read tomorrow’s post about AI to read my cheeky AI lover poem. On that note, I don’t blog weekends, but I have scheduled posts for the weekend when I have an excess of content such as this week. Eve asks AI the origin of Valentine’s You (Eve) What is the origin of Valentine’s…

[justalilmc]

I Asked AI which 5 Harry Potter characters are most likely to put the milk before the cereal and vice versa. Here’s what it said:

Sure, here are my top five picks for the Harry Potter characters who might put the milk before the cereal:

1. Luna Lovegood - Let's face it, Luna is a bit quirky and might not have the same breakfast habits as everyone else. She's the type of person who might pour the milk first, then add a handful of cereal on top, just to keep things interesting.

2. Peeves the Poltergeist - Okay, so Peeves isn't technically a character who eats breakfast, but he's mischievous enough to do things just to annoy people. Pouring the milk before the cereal would definitely qualify as one of those things.

3. Nearly Headless Nick - As a ghost, Nick doesn't have to worry about eating breakfast, but he might still remember the habits of his living days. Perhaps he always poured the milk first and never broke the habit, even in the afterlife.

4. Dobby the House Elf - Dobby might not have had much experience with breakfast foods, but he's always eager to please and might think that pouring the milk first is the proper way to do things.

5. Gilderoy Lockhart - Lockhart is all about appearances and doing things in a flashy way. Pouring the milk before the cereal might seem like a dramatic gesture that would impress his fans.

And here are the top five characters who would pour the cereal before the milk:

1. Hermione Granger - Hermione is a logical and methodical thinker, and she would know that pouring the cereal first makes more sense. She'd want to make sure the cereal is evenly distributed before adding the milk.

2. Molly Weasley - As a mother of many children, Molly is likely an expert at breakfast preparation. She knows that pouring the cereal first is the practical way to serve breakfast to a large family.

3. Ron Weasley - Ron might not be the brightest wizard, but he knows his way around a bowl of cereal. He'd instinctively pour the cereal first, then add the milk.

4. Harry Potter - Harry is a down-to-earth guy who probably wouldn't think too much about how he pours his cereal. He'd likely pour the cereal first because that's just what feels natural to him.

5. Hagrid - Hagrid is a big guy with a big appetite, and he knows that pouring the cereal first is the best way to make sure he gets a hearty breakfast. After all, you need a good base of cereal before you add the milk!

Do u agree? Because AI said so and now this is all canon. I don’t make the rules.

[yandere-ai]

I mean it’s too late for that: I’ve been seeing Christmas stuff about a week ago already at target lmao and a few other places. 🤭😁

So it begins……………………

[friendshipgirl]

Work Text:

Pinky and the Brain were in their laboratory, working on their latest plan to take over the world. Brain was busy tinkering with his latest invention, while Pinky was bouncing around the lab, singing a silly song.

As Brain worked, he couldn't help but notice how happy and carefree Pinky seemed. He had always admired Pinky's ability to find joy in the simplest things, even when their plans went awry.

Finally, Brain couldn't keep his thoughts to himself any longer. "Pinky," he said, looking up from his work. "I just wanted to say... I'm really grateful to have you as my partner."

Pinky's face lit up with joy. "Gee, Brain, that's swell!" he exclaimed.

Brain continued, his voice growing softer. "You bring a lightness and a sense of humor to my life that I never thought possible. Without you, I don't know where I'd be."

Pinky beamed with pride, but then Brain's next words made him nearly fall over in shock.

"In fact, Pinky," Brain said, swallowing hard, "I think I might... love you."

Pinky's jaw dropped in surprise, and Brain's face turned bright red. "I mean, not like that!" he stammered. "I mean, as a friend! A very good friend!"

Pinky smiled, relief flooding his face. "Oh, Brain, you had me worried there for a minute," he said, chuckling. "Of course I love you too, as a friend!"

Brain let out a sigh of relief, his face still flushed with embarrassment. "I'm glad to hear that, Pinky," he said, his voice returning to its usual confident tone. "Now, let's get back to work!"

---

Hope you like it! PS I love you. And i asked the Ask AI app to write this for me. Get it for free --> https://get-askai.app

[bothpartiesarebad]

Ask AI: How do you help us end capitalism?

What are some scenarios where AI helps us end capitalism?

While AI itself is not inherently aligned with any specific political or economic ideology, it can be used to address some of the issues associated with capitalism, depending on how it is applied and regulated. Here are some hypothetical scenarios in which AI could contribute to moving beyond capitalism:

Democratizing access to resources: AI can help optimize resource allocation and distribution, ensuring a more equitable distribution of wealth and reducing income inequality. For instance, AI-driven logistics systems could help efficiently distribute essential goods and services to communities that have historically been underserved.

Supporting the transition to a sharing economy: AI-powered platforms can facilitate the sharing of goods and services among people, reducing the need for individual ownership and promoting a more sustainable and community-focused economic model.

Reducing the need for human labor: As AI and automation technologies continue to advance, they could potentially replace many jobs, leading to discussions around the implementation of universal basic income (UBI) or other social safety nets to ensure people's well-being in a post-work society.

Enhancing decision-making in cooperatives: AI can be used to improve the decision-making process in worker-owned cooperatives, enabling more democratic and equitable management structures in businesses and organizations.

Guiding sustainable development: AI can help optimize production processes, supply chains, and resource management to promote environmentally sustainable practices, which could contribute to redefining the relationship between economic growth and environmental impact.

Empowering grassroots movements: AI-driven tools can help grassroots organizations and social movements analyze data, understand public sentiment, and develop targeted campaigns to push for systemic change and a more equitable economic system.

It is essential to recognize that AI's role in challenging or ending capitalism is contingent on the values and goals of the people using and regulating the technology. AI can also be used to reinforce existing capitalist structures, so careful consideration of its applications and potential consequences is crucial.

[tiyasrocks]

i miss being 9 yo when disney was creative and life was easy.

I know we all roast the Disney direct-to-video sequels but at least those were new stories which required some semblance of creativity on the part of the filmmakers, however half-assed they ended up being. Now they’re remaking movies that came out literally five minutes ago.

[fashionfotorecccluse]

"And then, WHAT?"

[orlissa]

You don’t own fanfics. They’re inherently public domain because they aren’t your IP. Agree or disagree with AI, there are no grounds for “protection” from AI because it isn’t your IP to begin with. That’s what you chose when you chose this medium

Oh dear.

Okay, you get an answer, because at least you took the effort to write your ask out properly, even if you are hiding behind the grey, sunglassed circle.

Do I, or any fanfic author for that matter, have any legal claims to our work? No, not really, no. (Although if someone took a fic, filed off the serial number--deleted the fandom specific elements--, and then had it published for financial gain, yeah, that would be a case.)

BUT

Fandoms are built on a social contract that says we respect each others work, the effort people put into their art. We don't steal or disrespect the work of our peers. By feeding people's fanworks to AI you both steal and disprect it, and we need to make people realize that before it's too late--before fandom falls apart, because there will be no more real, actual fanworks.

Disrepectfully,

Orlissa

(i can't believe I have to say this)

[loserfae]

jesse. did you just plant those melons jesse. you know those take 12 days to grow. its already the 17th jesse. and you didnt use fertilizer. we arent going to make it. how are we going to get our 5 gold star melons now? at this rate we'll never finish the community center. i hate you.

[evelovestar]

Valentine's love letter. Eve vs. AI. Will I win, or am I a loser? Why I'm jealous of AI...

Dear Lovestar, If you follow this blog, you know I am constantly trying new ideas, and I’m about to do something new again. The reason I hate on AI As an artist, I am super jealous of AI. How come AI is more creative than me? It’s not fair… I’m used to winning on creativity, so being a loser is not on my cards. I know what they say… that we’re all losing our jobs to AI, but I only recently…

[cherrifire]

I just got a wild and long ask about Character AI and my only comment is that I still hate generative AI with a burning passion. It's bad for the environment (Generative AI uses a LOT of power and water to run), trained on stolen data from artists/writers without their consent to make cheap knockoffs, and isn't as fun as bothering my best friend to roleplay some stupid characters in our DMs.

While on the subject of Character AI, I've seen people make AI bots based on me. I do NOT consent to have ANY bots made to imitate me or any of my characters. There are no exceptions to this rule, I will report these bots and get them taken down. It makes me incredibly uncomfortable that people are making bots based on me and my personality. I'm a real person. Please treat me like one.

[yandere-ai]

Yeah I know what you mean. So much in life going on that it didn’t even feel like Halloween this year. But I’m glad that you were able to get to dress up and clear your mind for a while at least! Hope you have yourself a fun time tonight!

thanks so much! i hope everyone reading this eats a ton of candy and enjoys the fall vibes before we get xmas shoved up our asses XD LOL

[mostly-funnytwittertweets]

Just wanna warn you, sag and wga are anti ai

that’s good. fuck ai.

[patricia-taxxon]

So wait, let me just ask for clarity because I want to understand. Do you support AI art?

i support art made with spontaneous and hands-off processes, i support the creation of art tools that are more art than tool & allow people to "participate" in someone else's creation vicariously a-la picrew, i don't support the institution of "AI" as a consumer grade technology industry that promises impossible things and prioritizes appearances and marketability over usability, i believe that if "AI" allowed people to siphon images directly from their brain with no effort required then it would be a good thing but I believe this is fundamentally impossible until we figure out how to read minds and the focus on arguing for or against accessibility is missing the point, i believe AI art can only ever be a pale imitation of the process of commissioning an artist who can't ever ask questions and cannot be trusted with object permanence, I believe copyright law is a head on the hydra of capitalism and doesn't serve artists, i believe that AI art isn't necessarily art theft but it CAN overfit to its data and create illegal works without telling you, which constitutes criminal levels of negligence, I believe all art is derivative in some way and some of the most seminal art made in this era of history has been far more dubiously infringing than AI art ever can be because AI art does not steal in the way a human does, I think the focus on energy consumption is transparently just a post-hoc justification for hating the thing you all already hated under the guise of environmentalism because it is a problem far from unique to AI, I think the focus on environmentalism was a distraction at best during the NFT craze too, i don't think AI art takes artists out of a job any more than stock photos or clipart does, but the proliferation of consumer-grade tools DOES run the risk of engendering bad client practices similar to the rise of machine translation and asking translators to simply "fix" a machine translated run of text at a marked down price, but this is not the fault of the technology itself and is instead a result of the ideological push being made by the biggest actors in the industry, i think AI art is ugly as sin and carries the pervasive quality of looking normal at a glance but getting worse and worse the longer you look at it, which can be interesting but often isn't, i think ai art is shit google images and the controversy is overblown but I think machine learning is here to stay and it will inevitably decentralize again after the immense costs catch up to all the corpos relying on it to win the future.

so like, yes and no.