#andrew yule
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
tavolgisvist · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Sondra Peterson & Deborah Dixon with The Beatles during a photoshoot for McCall's Magazine in the Bahamas, photo by Enrico Caruso, 7 March 1965
Photo robbed from
A hundred to one they are quite another beautiful women, but this set always reminds me about it:
The Beatles' first exposure to heroin is believed to have taken place in 1965. While filming Help! on Huntington Hartford's estate on Paradise Island in the Bahamas, director Richard Lester witnessed two women attempting to introduce Paul McCartney to the drug. [Lester] accidentally overheard two of the most beautiful women he had ever seen, dressed in identical, stunning black swimsuits, try to coax Paul into taking heroin. The combination of their sexual come-on and the enticement towards hard drugs was one of the most chillingly evil moments Lester has ever encountered … His sense of relief when Paul rebuffed the twosome was profound.​
(The Man Who Framed the Beatles: A Biography of Richard Lester by Andrew Yule​, 1994)
152 notes · View notes
bipanicoverthegravessiblings · 11 months ago
Text
Look- here me out—
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
These four as a friend group
79 notes · View notes
imalison · 1 year ago
Text
Okay, so can we talk about No Good Noelle for a second. This game wasn't explicit or detailed as Tcoaal, obviously, but I feel like its endings were headed in a similar direction
Tumblr media
We were given two choices, which led us to two contrasting endings.
Pretty similar to the decay and burial route.
In No Good Noelle
With the Ivy Route
If we choose to stay with her "best friend," no progress will be made in her life. She'll continue living in her shadows, working under her to make snowballs. Nothings new
Tumblr media Tumblr media
She's literally good for nothing and remains the same. The entire narrative is basically what the title was all about.
Tumblr media
She was given a choice
She could've gone with Yule
She could've made a change
But she chose to remain the same
Now, if we compare it with the Coffin of Andy and Leyley
There are two branches for this one as well. One will lead us to a brighter ending with questionable choices, and the other one will bring a closure to the story.
The coffin of Andy and Leyley
Basically them dying together
Again, nothing is new. It was already known from the start. They were simply following the title in a straight line.
It's like one step forward two steps behind
Basically, it brings us to the light that whatever we did in the game just gets thrown to waste in the end.
The progress we could've made with those little teasing moments and a hint of a new future gets shunned away, which is depressing
So, what I'm trying to say is that we are either basically doing something for a change or making zero progress what so ever
Either way, we got a glimpse of their story
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that there's a wrong choice.
One is just perfectly depicting their titles.
Noelle really proving that she's a no-good noelle,
Tumblr media
and the decay ending really closing the tale of The coffin of andy and leyley
Tumblr media Tumblr media
But the burial and yule route, both of them are chaotic, both of them emphasis on exploring another outcome
This time, all the interactions didn't go to waste
The choices led up to a change in the cycle. We broke out of it, and this new ending is progress in its twisted way.
It proves the title wrong, at least in some way
So now we can look at it from a metaphorical perspective
Noelle is still the same. She still can't make highly professional snowflakes, but when she teamed up with yule, she got out of the miserable life she was in. She refused to succumb under her mother or her best friend.
Tumblr media
She refused to follow the regulations and cheat. She chose to be deceitful instead
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Pretty similar to Ashley and Andrew not following the regulations of the society and burying their old selves figuratively.
This goes for the questionable route
Cause this is them growing as their own person instead of trying to fit in and following what's supposed to be right.
Denoting that the twisted path is actually the happiest one for the characters
—------------------—
Also, it's mind-blowing how well the titles fit both the routes. No good, noelle can also denote that she's bad. A warning sign that she might not be as nice as she seems after all. 'Oh, she is up to no good.' The same can apply for The coffin of andy and leyley, like I mentioned before.
Honestly, it's genius work.
68 notes · View notes
bughead-in-the-comics · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
From An Old School Yule, Archie Double Digest #223 (2011).
14 notes · View notes
melistrasus · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
it’s finally love actually season!!! also first post on tumblr i have no clue what to post ☹️
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
swampflix · 3 months ago
Text
Quick Takes: Ghosts of Yule
This hazy dead space between Christmas and the New Year finds the boundaries between this world and the next at its thinnest, even thinner than on All Hallows’ Eve.  That’s why Yule season is the perfect time to read, watch, and share ghost stories.  It’s a tradition most faithfully observed in annual retellings of Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol and in annual British television broadcasts…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
snowbairdd · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
A Yule log. It's a wonderful tradition. One log is chosen, and everyone in the house touches it and makes a Christmas wish.
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST: THE ENCHANTED CHRISTMAS (1997) dir. Andrew Knight
2K notes · View notes
hohohozier · 1 year ago
Text
Now that the Christmas season is over and I’ve listened to most of the songs multiple times, I have some specific requests, in order of most to least important (to me lol)
O Holy Night
The First Noel
O Come All Ye Faithful
Silent Night
Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas
I’ll Be Home For Christmas
What Christman Means to Me
Go Tell It On The Mountain
I’ve kept this thought to myself for years but I believe now is the time to manifest it: Hozier Christmas/Yule album
47 notes · View notes
gardenwalrus · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Within Andrew Yule, The Man Who “Framed” the Beatles: A Biography of Richard Lester (1994)
438 notes · View notes
getocurse · 2 months ago
Text
Dissecting harry and tom.
My headcanon of harry's height and physical appearance (I know it's been done too many times already but hmm sshhh).
James potter was considered tall by voldemort. The male average height by the 1970s - 1980s was 5'10" (courtesy of a Google search and reading a few articles). If he's tall, I hc him as 6'1" by the age of 21.
In the books, harry grew up a lot after 15 and stood as tall as his father at the age of 17, which indicates that harry was a late bloomer.
His food intake is not consistent. He was not given proper portions as a child. At Hogwarts, he had plenty of food but often neglected his food intake out of stress. His friends encourage him to eat by sending him food and molly fussed over his diet.
Even without proper nutrition, harry stood at james 21 years old height at 17. What could Harry's height be when he grows up more?
Harry has an active lifestyle from the start. Running away from his bullies and training for quidditch.
Quidditch practice and drills are not the usual gym weightlifting and excercise. There's a general idea in fanon that a seeker is of slight build which is contrary to Cedric diggory who was athletic and fit. As a seeker, harry needs to train his entire body to go as fast as he can, dodge bludgers, dive sharply, pull up his broom at the last minute and hone his reflexes.
His firebolt was very responsive to him and harry felt like it was an extension of himself. But he would've had to use his own strength against the g-force. No matter how responsive the broom is, ultimately harry is the one controlling it.
So harry probably had a toned body. Not muscular ofc but something close to Andrew Garfield in the Amazing Spider-Man. Not with visibly bulky muscles but wiry and lean.
After the war, harry would have more time to eat. He had his auror training, which could've involved more intense physical training with a proper regimen. He might've developed muscles with this and a better diet.
Harry's attractiveness is not described but he's implied to be quite the looker. He inherited Lily's almond eyes, his father's hair. His eyebrows are similar to james but his nose is smaller. His face shape might be a combination of both. As he grows up, his face would be more and more defined. Lily was gorgeous and james was attractive.
He had girls giggling around him, trying to ask him out for the yule ball and he dated the prettiest girls in Hogwarts. Parvati, cho and ginny were all described to be really pretty by the boys.
Now why am I playing the same record again? Because of the tomarry ship. Harry is so very often shown as the delicate, malnourished boy. Especially in the tomarry fandom. But he doesn't stay the same small and skinny boy forever does he?
The entire story revolves around Harry's growth.
Really, boys grow up. Especially a late bloomer like harry would definitely grow more. I've seen the tiniest boys around me shoot up like bamboos and it's very common among men to keep growing till they're 21.
Coming to physical strength, harry is pretty damn strong even by 17. He tackled his opponents, threw punches on draco enough to get banned from quidditch and wrestled his enemies. My most favourite of all is that he choked a grown man, pulled him upto his height and held him there in one hand. So, he's strong.
Personality wise, harry is a very complex character.
He grew up in a household shushing him. He's not the stereotypical talkative, brash and loud gryffindor.
He's in fact described to be brooding in general; more and more when there's impending doom. Only the readers get insight into his mind but the characters around him see him differently. He appears cold and closed off to the general population. Only with his friends and his chosen family, he's a bit vulnerable.
Harry is very discrete with his own emotions. He bottles up his feelings and is shown to be embarrased and aversive to emotional vulnerability. He cringed when cho cried. But he comforted his friends as best as his emotionally stunted mind could. So he's awkward with words and emotions.
His anger runs cold. He's described to speak coldly when angry. But when he's too frustrated and stressed, he lashes out with his words. Grabs and shoves people. He yells and throws objects. Specifically the scene in Dumbledore's office was heartbreaking. Because it was the culmination of all his rage, stress and sadness, just exploding.
Harry had some of the best retorts and comebacks. He's witty and has a charmingly dry humor. But it's not for humor, so much as a defence mechanism. He shows his sense of wit from his childhood to the final battle, where he engaged voldemort in a verbal fight too.
How loving was harry? He cared for his loved ones in wierd ways. He's not used to the love languages we know and it shows a lot. He understands people's situation and feels empathy for them but doesn't really know how to deal with their feelings. He offers reassurances and support when he can though.
So I find it really heteronormative and self insertive to constantly only show him as the same small boy. With the conventional trope of skinny bottom and big strong top. If that's your thing, it's your artistic rights and I have nothing against it. I only wish there was more canon appearance and traits though.
The usual brand of tomarry depicted with tom or voldemort being bigger is totally opposite to canon
Voldemort is described as tall and unnaturally thin. His height is frequently mentioned. I hc him as something around 6'3". So an experienced and mature harry going back in time would be of similar or the same height as tom riddle/ voldemort. Physically harry would be much stronger though. Tom's appearance is said to be gaunt and thin. Because tom was not the atheletic type (yes he flew but I rather think it was out of frustration with his first broom lessons) and he's depicted growing thinner and skeletal. In the resurrection scene, voldemort says he got his old body back meaning his appearance was a gradual descent over the course of his life.
Coming to Harry's courage, recklessness and his slytherin nature, Harry is so interesting. He's saddled with so many responsibilities but his resilience is his most brilliant virtue. No matter what, he survives.
What I don't like with tomarry is when harry is an utterly helpless child. Against all odds, harry survived. By circumstances, deus ex machina, convenient coincidences, or his own actions and strength, he was the victor through it all.
Voldemort was terrified of his prophecied enemy, enough to kill a small baby and constantly try to kill the kid again and again. His 16 years old horcrux screamed in terror when harry struck his diary, his adult self screamed in both rage and fear against harry in many instances. Contrary to the usual trope of harry shrieking and screaming in the fics, it's actually voldemort who does that a lot in canon. He's highly dramatic too.
The power imbalance tilts in the favour of voldemort too much in many fics. But they're equals. They are the antithesis and the parallels of each other. Why is this not portrayed more?
I don't mean it as a dark vs light, evil vs sunshine, dark lord vs cinnamon roll, manipulative tom vs oblivious harry, slytherin heir vs golden boy.
No I want the canon harry, who was so intuitive, perceptive, observant, charming, leading, talented and hardworking!
In magical power, voldemort was more experienced and had so much brilliance.
But harry had raw desperate power. His life is a constant motion of do or die. His magic doesn't work in the ways other's does. He's shown as incredibly powerful. He's capable of wandless magic, he doesn't really use his incantations properly in some scenes, his wand responds to him so well and his magic was definitely on par with tom riddle. He didn't need finesse or style. He didn't have to be showy. He's doing everything out of survival.
One scene I like is when Dumbledore who's growing weak after drinking that nightmare potion said he's not worried because he was with harry.
Not to mention by the end of the story, harry is the master of death. It's kind of implied that he might've been the MOD all along though.
Harry was a leader. He didn't want to be, but he was. People looked up to him. They had a sheep mindset flailing here and there but the acknowledgement of harry was always present. His words and actions had power and harry did wield it. He didn't shy away everytime. He knew his role.
He's the symbol of hope but not the paragon of light. He used crucio twice (bellatrix for killing sirius and some death eater for spitting at mcgonagall) and imperioed many times.
Another thing is Harry's love and empathy is blown upto astronomical levels. Harry's ultimate power was love but that was his parents' sacrifice too. It powered him and was the driving force.
Does that mean harry felt love, pity and empathy for every little thing and saved the world for it? Little bit yes. But I mentioned that harry kept a very close circle right? He cared for others and protected them yes, but it was all out of duty. He's not exactly a cinnamon roll. He's not forgiving. He's violent, has thoughts of harming and hurting people when looking at his enemies, even had such thoughts about Dumbledore. He was harsh to his own loved ones. Yelling at them, using blunt and cutting words in rage.
His feelings about murder is very clear. He's not scandalized about killing people. He didn't feel guilty about killing quirrel at 11 or the death eaters. He is a morally grey character. He knew that murder was a part of war. He was willing to put someone else in peril for his gains.
His mind is intuitive. He's also calculating and manipulative. He lies a lot, scares his uncle, scares his friends, takes the ultimate action in many situations, knows when to go with the flow, know how to try and get the best of any situation.
He's not flawless, but has many. He doesn't have a 2d personality. The layers he has and his complexity is what makes him so interesting to me.
His soul is described to be pure. But how pure is his mind after all he went through? Was he ever really as innocent?
Would such a person really submit himself to his tormentor? Harry would have more leverage on an equal foot. He'd be just as stubborn and brilliant as voldemort. He is an asshole, he is manipulative and cunning too.
The EQUALS part was the biggest factor which drew me to tomarry.
Hmmmmmmm. Hmmmmm. Hmm.
It changes the usual dynamics of the ship doesn't it. I want more of this take please please please.
It's the biggest reason why I prefer top harry or switching fics in general. I'm not much of a fan of bottom harry whose character doesn't align with canon. That's just me though. I don't have anything against bottom harry, but it's just not my thing. If the story doesn't mischaracterize him, I'll read it. Because this is fiction. Nothing to hold against anyone's expression of own interpretations.
In my head though, harry with his strong arms and skinny monster voldemort/ tom is delicious.
The amount of potential here is enormous.
67 notes · View notes
zsakuva · 3 months ago
Note
Hi saku! Since it's Christmas time, I have some Christmas related questions.
Which listener/s would go all out for Christmas?
Does Christmas exist in serula? If so is there something like a yule ball(yes I got this from Harry potter)?
Which character/listener would be the grinch of Christmas?
Pickle, SB, and Luca's.
No, Serulla has their own traditions.
I don't think any of them would be. The closest might be Andrew.
36 notes · View notes
percicosoftcore · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
andrew graves is my beloved sex symbol, walking red flag of a man who’s got a sister complex and i cherish him for it but, SINCE WE’RE APPRECIATING NEMLEI’S WORK CAN WE PLEASE TALK MORE ABOUT ‘BECAUSE LIFE WITH ME IS SO DIZZYING AND INTOXICATING’ YULE FROM NO GOOD NOELLE?
210 notes · View notes
creature-wizard · 10 months ago
Note
Hii genuine question. Are Christian holidays not actually from a basis of paganism? I felt like from what I’ve read about it before made sense to me
So like, a lot of people basically jumped to conclusions whenever a Christian holiday was either celebrated near the time of an old pre-Christian holiday, or its name sounded superficially similar to something pre-Christian, or its popular celebrations included elements that didn't seem quite Christian enough.
So, let's take Easter, for example. At one point, this guy Bede mentioned that the holiday got its name from "Eostremonath," IE, Eostre Month, which was named after an old goddess, Eostre. Now, that may very well be true, but it doesn't demonstrate that the holiday had pagan origins. See, when it comes to words for the holiday celebrating Jesus's resurrections, English is an outlier. Most European languages use words that derive from Pascha, which is ultimately derived from the Hebrew word Pesach, as in Passover.
There's also no evidence that Eostre's symbols included eggs or hares. In fact, everything we know about Eostre comes from Bede. Anything else is just guesswork. Dr. Andrew Henry of ReligionForBreakfast on YouTube, by the way, has a decent video on the topic of Eostre.
So why eggs, anyway? Well, back in the day, eggs were forbidden during Lent, so by the time Easter rolled around people had like a month's worth of eggs stacked up. So like, why not eggs?
And then of course, Alexander Hislop completely pulled the Easter/Ishtar connection out of his ass, because he was an anti-Catholic conspiracy theorist who did not care about scholarship, only about demonizing the Catholic Church.
Christmas has been claimed to have been derived from Saturnalia or Sol Invictus based on similarities in dates, but scholars have found that there was this belief that holy men died on the same day they were conceived. So if we start with Good Friday and fast forward nine months, that puts us either in December or January, depending on when exactly you believe Jesus was crucified. So Western traditions, which went for March 25, settled on December 25, whereas Eastern traditions, which went with April 6, got January 6. Dr. Andrew Henry talks about this here.
Christmas trees are also claimed to be pagan, but in reality they weren't a thing until the late medieval period. The earliest known reference to a decorated tree goes back to 1419. Or, it might be a tree; the word used ("Bom") could also mean a pole, as in a decorated pole like a maypole. It was shortly after this that people began erecting trees out in public squares. Again, Dr. Andrew Henry has a video on this.
And yes, it's true that Christmas is called something like Yule or Jol in other languages, but as we've determined from Easter, a name doesn't necessarily tell us where something came from. Most languages don't use anything like Yule; for example, English uses Christmas, as in, "Christ's Mass," while many languages use a word deriving from the Latin natalis, as in "birth," as in "Jesus's birthday."
Just about every attempt to link a Christian holiday to a pre-Christian one is operating on similarly poor methodologies. People just kinda drew conclusions based on things looking kinda similar without looking closer to see if they were really actually connected, or based on things not lining up with their personal ideas of how Christians ought to behave. (This whole idea that pure, true Christianity is sourced 100% from the Bible and the Bible alone is very Protestant, btw. It's also a position that would have baffled the earliest Christians, who didn't even have a New Testament and didn't regard things like the the epistles as holy scripture yet.)
Now of course, the Christianization of Europe didn't overwrite its cultures entirely, and local cultural beliefs and traditions ultimately did influence holiday traditions in some way; Christmas elves are a pretty clear example of this. But this whole idea that the Catholic Church just stole all these pagan holidays and remade them into Christian ones is pseudohistory.
54 notes · View notes
spaceyaceface · 2 years ago
Note
How do you think would Ominis Gaunt or Sebastian Sallow ask their favorite person to the Yule Ball?
(I'm salty that we didn't have an option to romance anyone, having the Yule Ball would have been a freaking fantastic way to introduce romance options 😂)
*slams hand down on table* WELL ANON LET ME TELL YOU I HAVE THOUGHTS.
The first is you’re so very right, we were robbed, and I’ll never forgive it.
Let’s start out with our dear Sebastian Sallow:
The boy likes to think he’s confident. And he is—in most aspects.
One of the ones he’s not so confident in is asking you to the Yule Ball.
That doesn’t stop him from pretending he is, though. Back in their dorm, he talks it up to Ominis, telling him, “Yeah, I’ll just ask them in Herbology, we’re next to each other anyways,” or “Tonight after dinner. A bit more private, after everyone else has cleared out.”
And he walks into each of those situations with the fullest intention of following through with his plans. But then he sees you and he can’t help thinking how daft he is for thinking you’d say yes. He still tries, though. He opens his mouth. He begins to speak. He even asks you something—it’s just never what he really wanted to ask.
Instead, what comes out is something like, “Want to play Gobstones in the Undercroft later?” Or “Think you could help me with my Potions essay?” And you say yes to that, so he’ll have to count that as enough for now.
Every time he goes back to his dorm knowing he’ll have to face Ominis’s exasperated sighs.
“Did you ask them?”
“Shut up.”
Again and again and again as the weeks melt away into days before the ball.
It’s when he hears someone else is planning on asking you that any inhibition vanishes in an instant. One second, his heart drops when Ominis tells him that Andrew Larson of all people is going to ask you, and the next he’s storming through the halls to find you. It doesn’t take long—you’re in a courtyard, chatting away to some other friends. He doesn’t even take the time to look around him.
“You’re going to the ball with me.”
Sebastian doesn’t even ask. He states it, eyes staring directly into yours.
You raise your eyebrow. “Since when?”
“Since I asked you.”
“And when did that happen?”
He has to think for a moment, realizing that technically, it still hasn’t, but this time, he’s quick to fix it.
“Will you do me the luxurious honor of going to the ball with me?” he finally asks, grinning.
You smile. “Yes, Sebastian. It’s about time you asked.”
When anyone asks him about it later, he’ll tell them it was a piece of cake. No big deal. Ominis will always roll his eyes at this, knowing full well that without his lie about Andrew Larson, it never would have happened.
As far as Ominis Gaunt goes:
He’s told everyone, including himself, that he doesn’t plan to go to the ball. He doesn’t want to, he claims. It’s not his thing.
Truth is, he just doesn’t want to go with anyone other than you. And he knows full well that won’t happen, as he has no intention of asking you.
You see, he doesn’t want you to feel obliged—that because he’s your friend, you have to say yes to the unpopular blind boy. He knows there are plenty other people who will ask you, so he decides to just leave it be.
Sebastian sees right through him, though, and does everything in his power to pester him until he changes his mind. It’s exhausting—which is saying a lot, because Sebastian is tiring enough on a normal day. Still, he refuses. But as the ball comes closer, he starts to feel small pangs of regret at his decision.
People talk about buying robes and dresses. Practicing dancing. There’s a contagious excitement in the air and he can’t help but get caught in it.
But he still convinced himself it’s for the best. It’s amazing you haven’t been asked yet—until suddenly, you have.
And you turned it down.
He’s shocked with Sebastian tells him, hearing the sky smirk in his voice. Garreth Weasley had asked you, and you’d said no.
It isn’t long until he goes off to find you, and soon he brings it up, his curiosity and maybe a little bit of hope getting to him.
“You said no to Garreth?” He asks.
You confirm this, and he’s baffled.
“The ball is only days away, what if you don’t get asked again?”
He’s shocked by the unworried tone in your voice when you respond. “There’s only one person I’d say yes to. Otherwise, I’m fine not going.”
Only one person… he can’t help bit frown, wishing he was the one who had captured your heart. “I suppose it’s for the best I don’t ask you and save you the trouble of rejecting someone else.”
He expects you to agree. To say sorry, but he was right. Maybe even to laugh at the mere idea.
What he doesn’t expect is for you to pause, voice going low when you finally say, “You’ll never know unless you ask.”
And it hits him that you want him to ask. That he is the one you were waiting for.
And when you say yes, he couldn’t be more overjoyed.
365 notes · View notes
ma-lark-ey · 6 months ago
Text
AFTG & scientific ideas/paradoxes i connect them with no elaboration
Originally this post was going to be all scientific laws & then I remembered the Irresistible Paradox & went down a paradox rabbit hole. I simply think about how 90% of scientif law/theory/paradox is deeply poetic.
Firstly, the Monsters (+Jean) all apply to: Hedgehog's Dilemma (despite goodwill, intimacy cannot occur without substantial mutual harm) and I mean that with my full chest.
Neil: Newton's First Law of Motion (an object in motion will stay in motion) Bhartrhari's Paradox (the idea that something can be unnameable conflicts with the notion that it is named by calling it unnameable)
Andrew: (OBVIOUSLY) The Irresistible Paradox (an unmovable object meets an unstoppable force)
Aaron: Newton's Third Law of Motion (when two objects interact, they apply forces of equal magnitude in opposite directions)
Nicky: The Catch-22 (having a need for something that can never be acquired on the basis of needing it)
Kevin: Hess' Law (the total change of a complete course of a chemical reaction is independent of the sequence of steps taken)
Jean: Hagen-Poiseuille's Law (liquid left in a vacuum will always rise)
Renee: The Law of Microscopic Reversibility (any chemical reaction can be undone if given enough energy & time)
Jeremy: Olber's Paradox (why is the night sky dark if there's infinite amounts of bright stars covering it?)
Wymack: Yule-Simpson Effect (a trend that appears in a group of data will disappear when similar groups are combined, and reverse trends will begin to appear)
Honorable Mentions:
Ferme's Paradox (the probable existence of alien life despite the complete lack of concrete evidence) (Neil)
I also think ship of theseus is very Renee coded.
Jeaneil: The Conservation of Energy (isolated systems can be found to be symmetries in time) Andrew, Aaron, Nicky: The Prisoner's Dilemma (people might not cooperate despite it being in their best interest)
The Young Sun Paradox (the evidence of liquid water early on earth despite equal evidence that the sun should not have been able to melt the ice yet)
17 notes · View notes
farm-fresh-hell · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
nemlei, queen of Healthy Family Dynamics
i love that this theme continues through her works: parentification of the children as a result of the adult's poor decision making. noelle herself points out that her mother never intended to have more than three children, but that she got pregnant anyway and is now unable to care for the lot.
there's no excuse for it. not really. it's childishness and selfishness in the extreme. noelle's father has yet to show up, but that in itself is indicative of what the parental relationship is like. i'm willing to bet that noelle's mother is having sex with him as a means of keeping him around. and even if i'm wrong... what's the rationalization? "we're in love"??? HAHA!
the blithe irresponsibility is giiiiiiiving mrs. graves. if you couldn't handle one "easy child", what the fuck made you think kid #2 would be okay????
it's just so fucking tragic because these kids never ASKED to be born. the responsibility lies solely with the parent.
even if, in this case, noelle's mom is being FORCED - a lack of autonomy isn't an excuse for shirking your responsibility as a decent human being. she has no excuse for essentially shunting her daughter into sex work should it come to that.
but what's more? noelle's agreement with yule.
she isn't choosing to "help" him because she's lazy or afraid of failure - though neither of those motives would suggest moral bankruptcy either; there's a real psychological toll attached to crashing and burning. but no. SHE'S making this deal with yule because she has no choice. because OUTSIDE CIRCUMSTANCES have forced her hand. kiiiinda like how outside circumstances have forced andrew and ashley to, you know, kill and eat people.
when the pipes break and everyone starts panicking it becomes clear just how ill-equipped noelle's mother is to handle adulthood and all it entails. she's a child asking a child to help her take care of other children. noelle has no fucking choice but to cheat in order to get her license. so she can get paid. because they need the fucking money.
even if it means making a deal with a devil to see it done.
it's really sad and REALLY relatable i REALLY appreciate nemlei for addressing this shit in their work. i sat down with the intention of playing a fun game and now i'm actually considering the themes of the work and whatever else. like damn.
57 notes · View notes