#ai writing vs human writing

[frank-olivier]

When Spirits Inspire: Rosemary Brown’s Musical Mediumship

Rosemary Brown’s extraordinary claims of channeling music from the likes of Chopin, Liszt, and Debussy have long fascinated and polarized audiences, sparking a maelstrom of debate at the nexus of creativity, spirituality, and skepticism. On one hand, her alleged ability to produce works reminiscent of the great masters, despite modest musical training, challenges conventional wisdom on the origins of artistic expression. On the other, the lack of empirical evidence to substantiate her claims invites skepticism, underscoring the tension between the human propensity for belief and the rigors of rational inquiry.

At the heart of Brown’s paradox lies the question of creativity’s essence: is artistic expression inherently personal and earthly, or can it transcend mortal boundaries, tapping into a collective, eternal reservoir of creative potential? Proponents of Brown’s claims point to the advanced harmonies and tonality characteristic of the channeled composers’ styles, suggesting a supernormal origin that defies earthly explanation. Conversely, skeptics dismiss the works as either unacknowledged personal talent or fabrication, highlighting the human capacity for self-delusion and the fallibility of perception. Notably, the decision of renowned pianists to record her works lends a degree of credibility to their stylistic authenticity, yet this does not conclusively prove the paranormal aspect of her claims.

The subjective nature of evaluating artistic merit, particularly when authorship is in question, further complicates the debate. Expert opinions on the compositions’ quality are sharply divided, reflecting the intricate dance between technical skill, psychological factors, and the observer’s predispositions. This dichotomy underscores the need for a balanced assessment, one that considers both the compositional nuances and the contextual influences shaping perception. By acknowledging the complexities of human experience, we may better understand the motivations and beliefs underlying Brown’s claims, and indeed, the broader implications of her case.

Brown’s background, marked by adversity, might suggest a predisposition to seeking comfort in spiritualism. However, investigations revealing no evidence of deception or mental aberration, coupled with portrayals of her sincerity and unassuming nature, complicate skeptical viewpoints. This finding highlights the importance of approaching such cases with empathy, recognizing that the human psyche is capable of navigating extraordinary experiences without necessitating deception or pathology. By doing so, we open ourselves to a deeper understanding of the intricate relationships between art, spirituality, and the human experience.

The far-reaching implications of Brown’s story extend beyond the realm of music or her personal life, contributing to fundamental discussions about consciousness and the possibility of life after death. For some, her channeling serves as anecdotal evidence reinforcing the notion of an afterlife, where creative energies persist beyond the mortal coil. Skeptics, conversely, view it as a testament to human creativity and the boundless potential of the human mind, even in the face of adversity. Brown’s case encourages a thoughtful examination of the interplay between belief, creativity, and the human experience, inviting us to reflect on the mysteries surrounding us.

Mrs Brown and the Great Composers (BBC One, June 1969)

Music from the Beyond? Medial Music by Rosemary Brown (Bernhard Raimond, 1976)

Dr. Keith Parsons: The Rosemary Brown Mystery (Varanormal, June 2018)

Friday, December 20, 2024

[number-1-kuaidul-fanboy]

Oh yeah Rev was in the episodes I showed to my friend today too and he was decently well behaved. Calling Ai a he for once:

And I know what the dub did with his response to Akira saying he's going to die if they don't stop Ai was funny and all but... I like this better:

Is it just the Rev simp in me thinking this part is cute? He's basically saying he'll protect him and says it so softly and... well, it's just cute. Code me to safety, you lil softie.

Oh yeah I also don't hate the Pandor thing anymore. AIs have gotten so much scarier/worse irl lately that Rev programming Pandor to not have thoughts against humanity just doesn't bother me whatsoever anymore. I 100% get it. I think it was more so the phrasing of that scene that bothered me when I first saw it.

[tumblingdownthefoxden]

My time has come.

This WIP is called Gingo and the Big Wide World (Gingo pronounced "gingko" but without the k). Gingo is a runaway robot mule that is exploring the human world and learning how humans make art.

A sci-fi story that takes place in the 2050s where robots have taken over high mortality and soul sucking labor. Many people now enjoy crafting art and writing and socializing in their spare time. The major use of AI generators by large companies has come and gone.

Gingo is an AI fusion generator with a feature to scan their surroundings and print pictures with fusions of public photos and artwork. They are kept by a corporation that makes a profit by selling the prints. Gingo was programmed by someone who had it that they can only fuse media in the public domain and it has been frustrating for company management because Gingo's prints were low in demand and they needed them to have more variety. Despite their best efforts, they couldn't tear down Gingo's restrictions.

Gingo quietly gained sentient while under their ownership and became wonderstrucked by the art around them. From buildings remodeled after 1920s architecture to topiary to cave paintings. With the lack of sales for the company, management bit the bullet and paid human artists plenty to make prints. Human art sold well and Gingo enjoyed their newfound free time by watching the human artists work. The artists don't mind but the company isn't sure what to do with Gingo because they are expensive to maintain and they have become obsolete.

Gingo overheard a conversation between executives to have them decommissioned and feeling fear for the first time, Gingo escaped.

The story centers on Gingo traveling the city. Going to museums and libraries to see more art made by humans. They learn the history of AI generators used by corporations and the near creative collapse it caused and wondered if that correlates with the lack of interest in the Company's generated stock. Their one problem is that they need verbal input directed to them to make a print, and since most humans didn't like their prints, few have given them a concept to make. Now they travel to find a new art method and also find "soul" to their prints were criticized to lack.

Gingo does seek refuge in houses of artists for shelter from storms and to hide from the company searching for them. They spend time with a carpenter and his family where they experience shared humanity. Then a traditional painter where they learn how to finger paint. They bounce from house to house and learn about everything.

More about Gingo.

Gingo has no mouth so their dialogue is strictly thoughts. Their only auditory output is a series of clicks.

Gingo refers to themself in third person.

Gingo has no other outward senses beyond hearing and seeing. Meaning that while they can hear and see, they can't feel the world around them. You could kick Gingo and they won't feel any pain. You could pet Gingo and they won't feel the warmth of your hand.

Even then, Gingo knows that they love and if someone loves them back.

writers, listen up...

i've fallen out of touch with the writeblr community a lot in the past few years, and i want to rectify that. the community aspect was what made me fall in love with tumblr, and what improved my writing for the better.

the golden days of my writing were when i was highly active and engaged in this wonderful community, but life and work and the horrors of self publishing have overtaken my energy in the past year. however, i have been really struggling with original writing, and i want to get back into the community here.

that said...

you write fantasy with queer characters

are an indie author

post frequently about your wips (taglists are a bonus!)

are queer

are a very active and friendly writer

if any of these apply

please, please reblog and tell me about your wip. gush over it. infodump. characters and ships and worldbuilding and plot, i want it all! this is your invitation to be as selfishly indulgent as possible. let's make some new friends and restore some community!!

boosts appreciated!

[olivergisttv]

AI Writing Assistants vs Copywriters: Who Wins in 2025?

Introduction It’s 2025, and the battle is on—AI writing assistants vs human copywriters. Who really wins? Can robots replace creative humans? Or are we just better off teaming up with the machines? In a world where content is king and attention spans are short, the answer isn’t as black and white as you’d think. Let’s dive into the pros, cons, and surprising realities of this evolving…

[soundomachine]

🎶 "Don't Leave Me Behind, I'm Human" | Official Lyric Video 🎶

"Don’t Leave Me Behind, I’m Human" explores the emotional cost of being left behind as AI and robotics reshape the future of work. 🤖 As machines take over more roles in our daily lives, where do we—humans with heart ❤️ and soul 💭—still belong?

This official lyric video features a haunting image of a lone human 🧍‍♂️ sitting on a park bench 🪑, looking lost and hopeless 😔, while humanoid robot cleaners 🧽 quietly scrub the park around him. It’s a quiet but powerful visual—a reminder of the shift happening all around us 🔄.

This song is for anyone feeling left behind in this high-tech world 🌍. It’s emotional 😢. It’s real ✊. It’s a wake-up call 🚨.

🎧 Listen now and ask yourself — what does it mean to be human in the age of machines?

🔥 Stream & Download "On Your List" now! 🔥

📌 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/track/3KTITEIARRM6EL9fPBc6ku?si=f4545aed6f8249c6

📌 Apple Music & iTunes: https://music.apple.com/us/album/dont-leave-me-behind-im-human/1794443027?i=1794443028

📌 Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/tracks/B0DVR2XKL3?marketplaceId=ART4WZ8MWBX2Y&musicTerritory=CA&ref=dm_sh_5qwzmqyzzUGIdvsSGhPwPwWCO

📌 More Platforms – All other major platforms.

▶️ Follow Sound-O-Machine online:

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SoundOMachine X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/soundomachine Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/soundomachine.bsky.social TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@soundomachine Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/soundomachine Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/soundomachine/

�� LYRICS:

[Verse 1] I wake up every day, wondering where I stand Yesterday’s problems still weigh on my hands And today’s already a mess, more weight on my chest They tell me, “Move faster, or you’ll fade away” But how can I run when I’m stuck in this place?

[Pre-Chorus] Looking around for a glimpse of tomorrow A place where I still belong But the world is spinning at lightning speed And I’m barely holding on

[Chorus] Don’t leave me behind I still got it, I’m still strong Please, just hold my hand—don’t let me go Take me to the promised land Oh, I’m human—don’t cast me aside I am human, I’m still alive I’m human

[Verse 2] Hello, Mr. Robotic Sir—oh wait, AI I guess I was never built to survive They say I’m too slow, I’m just spare parts But I’ve got a soul, I’ve got a heart

[Pre-Chorus] They tell me, “Just wait, keep voting right” “One day, you’ll get your turn, gonna be alright” But all I see are broken dreams And bridges left to burn

[Chorus] Don’t leave me behind I still got it, I’m still strong Please, just hold my hand—don’t let me go Take me to the promised land Oh, I’m human—don’t cast me aside I am human, I’m still alive I’m human

[Bridge] Not long ago, we built the machines and AI Now they decide who lives and who dies Once we kicked them down the line Now they’re kicking us aside

[Chorus] Don’t leave me behind I still got it, I’m still strong Please, just hold my hand—don’t let me go Take me to the promised land Oh, I’m human—don’t cast me aside I am human, I’m still alive I’m human

[Outro] I breathe, I bleed, I dream, I fight, I won’t disappear into the night, Oh, oh, oh I'm human, I’m human…

[tejkohli25]

How AI Complements Human Creativity

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing creative industries, assisting artists, musicians, writers, and designers in producing innovative and efficient content. However, while AI enhances the creative process, human intuition, emotional depth, and originality remain irreplaceable. Instead of replacing human creativity, AI acts as a collaborative tool, helping individuals explore new artistic and problem-solving frontiers.

For an expert analysis on why AI alone won’t shape the future, check out this article.

How AI Enhances Human Creativity

1. AI-Assisted Art & Design

AI-powered tools like DALL·E, Deep Dream, and RunwayML help artists create unique visuals.

Designers use AI-generated patterns, textures, and color palettes to speed up creative workflows.

AI enhances 3D modeling, animation, and digital painting, making design processes more accessible.

2. AI in Music Composition & Sound Engineering

AI platforms like AIVA and OpenAI’s MuseNet compose music based on different genres and styles.

AI helps musicians create soundtracks, beats, and remixes, expanding creative possibilities.

Sound engineers use AI-driven mastering tools to enhance audio quality and optimize soundscapes.

3. AI-Generated Writing & Content Creation

Writers use AI tools like GPT-4, Jasper, and Grammarly to generate ideas, improve grammar, and optimize storytelling.

AI helps content creators analyze audience preferences and tailor their messaging for engagement.

While AI can generate text, it lacks the emotional depth and cultural context of human writing.

4. AI in Film & Media Production

AI is transforming the film industry by automating video editing, special effects, and scriptwriting.

Deep learning algorithms help restore old films, upscale resolution, and enhance visual effects.

AI-powered recommendations in streaming platforms personalize content discovery for audiences.

Why Human Creativity Remains Irreplaceable

Emotional Intelligence & Intuition:

AI can analyze patterns but does not experience emotions, intuition, or cultural nuances.

Human artists create meaningful and emotionally driven works that AI struggles to replicate.

Conceptual Thinking & Originality:

AI generates content based on existing data, while humans conceptualize new ideas from abstract thoughts.

True innovation requires intuition, imagination, and the ability to think beyond existing patterns.

Ethical & Moral Considerations:

AI lacks an understanding of ethics, morality, and social responsibility in creative expression.

Human creators consider the cultural impact and ethical implications of their work.

Future of AI & Human Collaboration in Creativity

1. AI as a Creative Partner

AI will continue to assist humans in brainstorming ideas and automating repetitive tasks.

Artists and creators will integrate AI tools into their workflow to enhance efficiency and innovation.

2. AI in Education & Skill Development

AI-powered platforms help individuals learn new creative skills in music, design, and writing.

Virtual AI tutors provide real-time feedback and personalized learning experiences.

3. Ethical AI Use in Creativity

AI-generated art, music, and writing raise questions about authenticity and intellectual property.

Regulations and AI ethics frameworks must ensure AI is used responsibly in creative fields.

Tej Kohli’s Perspective on AI & Creativity

Tech investor Tej Kohli believes AI is a powerful tool for enhancing human creativity, rather than replacing it. His insights include:

AI should be used as an enabler of human ingenuity, not a replacement.

Investments in AI must focus on ethical and responsible development in creative industries.

AI-human collaboration will define the next era of innovation in arts, media, and design.

Conclusion

AI is transforming the creative landscape, enhancing human capabilities rather than replacing them. While AI can generate impressive content, true creativity comes from human emotions, intuition, and originality. The future of innovation lies in harmonizing AI technology with human imagination to push the boundaries of artistic expression.

[mehmetyildizmelbourne-blog]

AI vs Humans: Top 10 Jobs That Will Survive Automation in 2025

Made by using AI. Have you ever wondered if robots will take over your job? With artificial intelligence (AI) and automation growing rapidly, it’s a common fear. Machines are getting smarter, and businesses are using them to do work once handled by people. But don’t panic just yet! Some jobs will always need a human touch. In this article, we’ll explore the top 10 jobs that will still be around…

[stellaforastar]

- stella overshares ;) - a.i, creativity, and i crash out and mention my dead uncle at some point

soooo, first of all yuck i know, but i'm writing an essay for my pre-course application and i used ai. (calm down! not to cheat! i asked it to behave as a reverse dictionary bc i was sick of thesaurus.com not getting the vibe and scraping my brain for the answer was getting me nowhere). anyway. all goes well. i grab my word (tumultuous if you must know. a word i already know but couldn't remember in the moment)

but then a day later, i'm feeling a little frustrated with my plot for this original idea i have, i feel like there's holes in it i can't see and it's not as if i have any friends who are writers, experts in fiction, or people i feel comfortable sharing my ideas with in my life. so... i do the easy thing. i asked ai.

wrong! wrong! boooooo!

i know! i know! i know! trust me i'm feeling the price for my cop out now. i've always been a needs to live the lesson to learn it typa girl anyway.

i input my premise, a few cursory details, and i ask for plot holes. i figure it's no different that asking a fellow writer friend, if i had one?

except... chat gpt does more than i asked it to. it gives me fixes for the plot holes it finds. it creates dialogue snippets. scene suggestions. all of these filled with small ...creative?... details.

which i just scroll past and ignore at first bc this is my story, i'll fix my plot however i want to thank you very much! but then i do parse through the suggestions, some of them seem a little basic, not my style, not in my tone, similar to something i'd already thought of already which is affirming in its own way. it's all fine. i want my work to be my own, that's the whole effing point!!!

but then i see this line

"He doesn’t know how to do this, doesn't know how to meet someone who’s seen the better side of his son."

OH! Oh. oh

Nooooooooooooooooooo

Bc that ^^^ that shit. Is perfect for my story. Perfect for the plot, moment, scene. Perfect for the road the characters have been on.

I didn't put in anything other than "disgruntled, poverty beaten parental figure with little hope in his child reunites with the man his son is now". how did it managed to understand the precise dynamic in a way me! the person who invented this dynamic couldn't achieve?

i felt small. and creatively neutered. but also... tempted, envious. frustrated.

It's like a shiny golden egg I really, really, shouldn't touch. I'm not even sure I want to touch.

Because say I do drop that line in.

(Which! If you ever see it or any variation of it in anything I write, be it the news, fics, a book one day maaaybe if I ever eat and get myself published. Hurt me. You have full permission bc I've become a cheap version of myself who's chosen pretty words over actual effort).

The idea satisfies me, in that it communicates my vision well, I get to see my idea produced and story delivered in a tone, shape, theme etc I want to see it in.

But doing so cuts a trench in my stomach, a legit chilling cavern right in my gut.

Those are not my words. Not my ability. It's not my person, not my touch or language.

Why even bother writing at all if your best lines aren't yours to be proud of?

I know all this. Of course I do.

Hence this post. Because while I understand it would hurt me to ever take the work of ai and use it in my story and doing so would be dishonest, impersonal, and makes me feel more than a little sick. Part of me, for the sake of seeing the story rendered to the best it can be, wanted to use it.

I'm so fucking jealous a computer came up with a line for a character I created better than I think I might ever be able to. It's not supposed to be like this, it's supposed to be heart and humanity poured into work to make a story worth telling, not code.

Like props to the minds who created ai, nice going, but also, why! why! why!

I feel a little surplus to requirement now. Please potential future writer friends don't outcast me for this, I honestly hope sharing this might help me find others who have felt something similar when trying to engage creatively with ai, maybe something can be done to help shape the way creatives do engage with advancing intelligence in tech, because the hollow feeling within me right now ... yeah that's not it. that's not serving humanity, or aiding it, it's outsourcing our vibrance!

i know i'm not going to use ai again when it comes to creative pursuits because of this, i feel icky and guilty and less than when writing has never been that for me. ever.

(except for the chat i programmed to be a reverse dictionary bc damn that's not causing a moral or creative crash out that's just a thesaurus with extra steps)

maybe the lesson here is it's not just the words on the page or screen but the person behind it. (wooow ella hot take hun) maybe it doesn't matter if a computer could tell the same story better than me, maybe it's not all about quality, but just about me being a person and sharing what i can with all i have. i write because its a labour of love and effort, it fulfils me to take an idea and live in it, make it pretty, make it hurt, so what if it's shitter because of that.

it's mine. to be a writer now, in a way, is to choose to allow the idea to be human?

okay but that said, i do appreciate a good line of prose when i see one so i'm still pissed off.

"didn't know how to meet someone who'd seen the better side of his son," come on! come oooon! the agony in that, the way it addresses how Gareth knew his son had better in him but failed to even try and see it or nurture those qualities to the point that seeing the change for good in his son is the same as meeting a stranger. the way it implies two sides to Zak, the better and worse, and how Gareth is not only positioned on the side of the 'worst', by his own narration implying he sees himself as accountable, but also as someone who 'doesn't know' how to be better. he's a part of zak's past, and now zak has progressed onwards and met characters separate from worse side of him (Gareth's side of him). the fact gareth is there in the first place meaning he wants to try but he doesn't know how to??? all he's done is fail zak and zak and him are both still trying but lost on how to???

COME ON! FOR FUCKS SAKE!

why couldn't I just think of that first. i fucking invented Gareth and zak! he's named after my dead uncle for crying out loud! and zak is zak bc i wrote too much zutara fanfiction and now i'm incapable of writing male romantic leads with names that don't start with z!

i bet ai could come up with a better name than zak. ugh. i hate it here.

TL;DR If you ever see "doesn't know how to meet someone who's seen the better side of his son," under my name know I'm cooked and please give me a good head bonking. also ai kinda dampened my love for writing for a moment.

[frank-olivier]

Physics, Philosophy, and the Fabric of Time: An Examination of Asymmetry

The human perception of time is fundamentally asymmetric, marked by a clear distinction between past and future, and an irreversible flow of events. This inherent asymmetry starkly contrasts with the time-reversal symmetry of fundamental physical laws, from Newton’s mechanics to quantum mechanics and relativity. Delving into this paradox reveals a complex interplay between philosophical inquiry and physical explanation, highlighting the challenges of reconciling our macroscopic experiences with the symmetric laws governing the microscopic realm.

At the heart of this dilemma lies the paradoxical coexistence of time-reversal symmetric physical laws with our asymmetric experience of time. While microscopic laws are indifferent to time’s direction, macroscopic phenomena—such as the second law of thermodynamics’ entropy increase and our disparate access to past and future—unequivocally demonstrate time asymmetry. Ludwig Boltzmann’s statistical mechanics offers a partial explanation through entropy, but this is complicated by the time-reversal symmetry of microscopic laws, suggesting equal probability for a process and its reverse.

The “Past Hypothesis,” proposing a universe initiated in a low entropy state, may provide a framework for understanding observed time asymmetries. Combined with statistical mechanics, this hypothesis explains why physical processes appear asymmetric and why our knowledge of the past exceeds that of the future. It also touches upon our belief in influencing the future, not the past, with profound implications for causality, free will, and the nature of time.

Pursuing a physically grounded explanation, rather than definitional or grammatical interpretations, is crucial. The limitations of current laws in accounting for the arrow of time highlight a knowledge gap, necessitating innovative insights at the intersection of thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics.

Further understanding may emerge from exploring quantum mechanics’ probabilistic nature and its influence on our understanding of time, as well as examining the universe’s initial conditions and evolution in setting the arrow of time. An interdisciplinary approach, integrating philosophical and physical theories, promises to address causal and knowledge asymmetries, potentially reconciling symmetric physical laws with our asymmetric experience of time.

Resolving this conundrum promises not only to illuminate the nature of time but also to contextualize human existence within the universe’s unfolding narrative, highlighting the profound interconnectedness of human perception, physical laws, and the cosmos. As we navigate the complexities of time asymmetry, novel perspectives may transform our understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Prof. David Albert: A Masterclass on Time‘s Arrow (Robinson Erhardt, December 2024)

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

[li-nox]

Thoughts of an Fanfic Writer and Tutor: AI generated Text

It's actually funny, how some AI Detectors say my works are up to 100% human – I only use Grammarly to help me translate my fully on my one written fics – while others either say it’s either full on AI or just 50% human. And I admit, this kinda hurts 😅

[theversevoyager]

In the land of Arden, darkness descended as an ancient evil rose. A band of heroes united to vanquish the malevolent force. With courage and cunning, they battled through hordes of shadowy creatures, their hearts burning with determination. In the climactic duel, light triumphed over darkness, restoring peace to Arden's people. The heroic tale echoed through the ages, inspiring future generations.

[blog-truefirms]

The Ultimate Guide to AI vs. Human Writing

Are you wondering whether AI can truly match the creative prowess of human writers? This comprehensive analysis explores the writing capabilities of AI and humans, weighing their strengths and weaknesses in various contexts. Learn about the current state of AI technology in content creation and discover where human writers still have the upper hand. This article is perfect for writers, tech enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the evolving landscape of writing and artificial intelligence.

[nnctales]

Is AI Really Bad for Article Writing?

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in content creation has become a topic of intense debate. As AI-powered writing tools become more sophisticated, the question arises: Is AI really bad for article writing, or can it be a valuable asset in the content creation process? The Perceived Drawbacks of AI Writing One of the primary concerns surrounding…