#Transcendental Idealism

[tmarshconnors]

“A high degree of intellect tends to make a man unsocial.”

Arthur Schopenhauer was a German philosopher. He is best known for his 1818 work The World as Will and Representation.

[nonage4life]

Roses are red

Violets are blue

We can never know things as they are themselves

But only as they appear to you

[motylemanuel]

You serve Kant

[blueheartbooks]

Delving into Kantian Philosophy: A Review of "The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant's "The Critique of Pure Reason" stands as one of the most influential and enduring works in the history of philosophy, reshaping the landscape of metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind. Published in 1781, this monumental treatise seeks to provide a comprehensive account of the nature, scope, and limits of human knowledge, offering profound insights into the nature of reality, the structure of the mind, and the conditions of possibility for knowledge.

At the heart of "The Critique of Pure Reason" is Kant's revolutionary concept of transcendental idealism, which posits that the mind plays an active role in shaping our experience of the world. Kant argues that the mind imposes certain fundamental concepts and categories—such as space, time, and causality—on our sensory perceptions, organizing them into a coherent and intelligible framework. Through his rigorous analysis, Kant seeks to uncover the a priori conditions that make experience possible, shedding light on the fundamental structures of human cognition.

One of the key themes of "The Critique of Pure Reason" is Kant's distinction between phenomena and noumena, or appearances and things-in-themselves. Kant argues that while we can only know phenomena as they appear to us through the filter of our cognitive faculties, there exists a realm of noumena that lies beyond the reach of human knowledge. This distinction has profound implications for Kant's philosophy, shaping his views on the limits of human understanding and the nature of metaphysical inquiry.

Moreover, "The Critique of Pure Reason" is notable for its meticulous analysis of the nature of space, time, and causality, which Kant identifies as the fundamental categories of human thought. Kant argues that these categories are not derived from experience, but rather constitute the necessary framework through which we interpret our sensory perceptions. By elucidating the synthetic a priori nature of these categories, Kant lays the groundwork for his transcendental idealism and challenges traditional empiricist and rationalist accounts of knowledge.

In addition to its groundbreaking philosophical insights, "The Critique of Pure Reason" is also celebrated for its rigorous methodology and systematic approach to philosophical inquiry. Kant's meticulous argumentation, intricate terminology, and careful exposition of concepts make "The Critique of Pure Reason" a challenging but rewarding read for scholars and philosophers alike. Kant's influence extends far beyond the boundaries of philosophy, shaping the development of disciplines such as psychology, physics, and linguistics, and leaving an indelible mark on the intellectual landscape of the modern world.

In conclusion, "The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant is a towering achievement in the history of philosophy, offering profound insights into the nature of human knowledge, the structure of the mind, and the limits of metaphysical inquiry. Kant's rigorous analysis, groundbreaking concepts, and systematic approach to philosophical inquiry make "The Critique of Pure Reason" a timeless classic that continues to inspire and challenge readers with its depth, complexity, and intellectual rigor.

Immanuel Kant's "The Critique of Pure Reason" is available in Amazon in paperback 24.99$ and hardcover 31.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 516

Language: English

Rating: 10/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

[blueheartbookclub]

Delving into Kantian Philosophy: A Review of "The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant's "The Critique of Pure Reason" stands as one of the most influential and enduring works in the history of philosophy, reshaping the landscape of metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind. Published in 1781, this monumental treatise seeks to provide a comprehensive account of the nature, scope, and limits of human knowledge, offering profound insights into the nature of reality, the structure of the mind, and the conditions of possibility for knowledge.

At the heart of "The Critique of Pure Reason" is Kant's revolutionary concept of transcendental idealism, which posits that the mind plays an active role in shaping our experience of the world. Kant argues that the mind imposes certain fundamental concepts and categories—such as space, time, and causality—on our sensory perceptions, organizing them into a coherent and intelligible framework. Through his rigorous analysis, Kant seeks to uncover the a priori conditions that make experience possible, shedding light on the fundamental structures of human cognition.

One of the key themes of "The Critique of Pure Reason" is Kant's distinction between phenomena and noumena, or appearances and things-in-themselves. Kant argues that while we can only know phenomena as they appear to us through the filter of our cognitive faculties, there exists a realm of noumena that lies beyond the reach of human knowledge. This distinction has profound implications for Kant's philosophy, shaping his views on the limits of human understanding and the nature of metaphysical inquiry.

Moreover, "The Critique of Pure Reason" is notable for its meticulous analysis of the nature of space, time, and causality, which Kant identifies as the fundamental categories of human thought. Kant argues that these categories are not derived from experience, but rather constitute the necessary framework through which we interpret our sensory perceptions. By elucidating the synthetic a priori nature of these categories, Kant lays the groundwork for his transcendental idealism and challenges traditional empiricist and rationalist accounts of knowledge.

In addition to its groundbreaking philosophical insights, "The Critique of Pure Reason" is also celebrated for its rigorous methodology and systematic approach to philosophical inquiry. Kant's meticulous argumentation, intricate terminology, and careful exposition of concepts make "The Critique of Pure Reason" a challenging but rewarding read for scholars and philosophers alike. Kant's influence extends far beyond the boundaries of philosophy, shaping the development of disciplines such as psychology, physics, and linguistics, and leaving an indelible mark on the intellectual landscape of the modern world.

In conclusion, "The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant is a towering achievement in the history of philosophy, offering profound insights into the nature of human knowledge, the structure of the mind, and the limits of metaphysical inquiry. Kant's rigorous analysis, groundbreaking concepts, and systematic approach to philosophical inquiry make "The Critique of Pure Reason" a timeless classic that continues to inspire and challenge readers with its depth, complexity, and intellectual rigor.

Immanuel Kant's "The Critique of Pure Reason" is available in Amazon in paperback 24.99$ and hardcover 31.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 516

Language: English

Rating: 10/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

[penhive]

A Transcendental Narrative

Transcendental in the realm of Philosophy means something heavenly, spiritual and metaphysical. For the word transcendental I embody a fleshy, carnal and earthly realm of human consciousness. I would like to use certain terms for connecting them and they are:

(a Transcendental idealism

(b Transcendental metaphysics

(c Transcendental dialectics

(d Transcendental humanism

(e Transcendental aesthetics

Transcendental Idealism

Transcendental idealism can be defined as the living plane of reality which is subjective and cathartic.  It is the sublimation of life. It is the celebration of meaning. It is a carnival of fetish. It is an idea rooted in the self. It is a fantastical celebration of the self. It’s narcissism of euphoria. It is the transcendence of the idealized subjectivity. It’s an embarkation of Prometheus. It’s a life of Bacchanalian revelry. It’s a verbal jargon of the self.

Transcendental Metaphysics

Transcendental metaphysics is an intimate connection of God with the self. It’s the free will of choice aligned with God’s will. It’s an advent of mythical spiritualism.  Religion becomes an art with God and the self. It is the art of placing all our hopes, will, desires, aspirations with the will of God. God celebrates the present and luck’s the future.

Transcendental Dialectics

What is transcendental dialectics? It’s a compromise of earthly life with spirituality. A famous statement can be taken from the Lord’s Prayer: give us this day our daily bread. Daily Bread is a metonymy suggesting God’s ability to take care one’s material needs. Again there is a statement in the Bible: The blessings of God are wealth earned without toil. It is the economy and luxury of self-realization.

Transcendental Humanism

Transcendental Humanism is the pursuit of the self to ideal of becoming. It’s a relationship of interaction based on love and trust it’s a call to become an ideal self. It’s a poetic heart of feeling. It is the living of the self with the democracy of the world. It is Camus rebellion of the self. It’s the manipulation of the self to make an intentional reality. The will soars to Promethean heights. It is the unlocking of the psychological Minotaur and embracing a democratic freedom of the self.

Transcendental Aesthetics

Now what is transcendental aesthetics? Art is the mirror of life beautified with qualitative experiences. The idea of art is found in the Philosophy of meaning. Art celebrates the essence of meaning. From the producers hands art enters the realm of subjective experience. The role of philosophy is to question essence and the role of art is to enjoy essence. From the fetish of the creator art evolves into a labyrinth of subjectivity. Art metamorphizes into an elan vital of existence. We are becoming creatures of the cosmos while enjoying art. Art is a phantasmagoria of existence.

[salvaation]

Not me planning out a Transcendental DJ costume.

[lorawant2sleep]

lately all that brings me pleasure is food, games and short videos

help

i'm turning into what i'm afraid of

[meltorights]

@pleuvoire it's basically kant's response to hume showing that causation is not something we can perceive with "pure reason" because there's no logical contradiction in the opposite of an effect happening. so hume said technically you cant prove that anything causes anything and you should be skeptical.

kant responds by saying that it's true that we can't directly, with reason, prove things like cause-effect, but things like cause-effect, time, and space are necessary for us to have experience at all--pure sense perception would be unintelligible without it. so while we may not be perceiving things in the world in themselves, we are perceiving how they have to appear to us, and can do a "transcendental deduction" to infer that the real world exists and is causing us to have the sense experience we have because otherwise our experience would just be unintelligible.

so, we process the sense information we receive with categories we "impose" (causation, time and space), but these categories are necessary for the intelligibility of our experience. so we can talk about cause and effect and space and such things logically--even if we can't logically prove they exist in the real world, they are necessary universal preconditions for intelligibility and so conclusions based on them apply to all rational creatures.

tl;dr. there's the neumena, the "things in themselves," which we cannot directly experience, and the phenomena, things as experienced in an intelligible way by us, and we can only apply logic to the phenomena and so cant technically prove things about the neumena, but can (by "transcendental deduction") "transcend" as it were our ideas by saying "unless x is true, our experience is unintelligible"

[moonlitkat]

Anime really peaked with the Samurai X trust and betrayal OVA, huh

[troph4eum]

The Trophaeum Project

In this blog I will be exploring many ideas that lead into a larger concept called "Trophaeum" which I have been working on since October, 2022 that I plan on making an album about.

The idea of Trophaeum as a concept came from the manga Air Gear, where it's used as a metaphorical goal for the characters.

Where Air Gear got the concept was from ancient Greek/Roman structures built from the weapons, armor, etc. of their enemies from a battle or war. This is where the word trophy comes from.

Now what's really important is how I'm using the concept.

It used to be relatively simple. "The summit of your emotional state and place in your life; those who face adversity from either their own mind, or the things around them, seek this apex of physical and mental balance." That's what I wrote like a year ago as an updated definition.

It's not that this no longer holds true. It's just that it means more than that to me now. The relationship between the ego, mind, and the soul. Whether or not people can truly understand each other. Thoughts of how the world is and if this is even possible in my lifetime. All those thoughts have been embedded into my view of what Trophaeum is.

As of writing I'm starting to see the prerequisites for me reaching Trophaeum. It's a struggle to put it into words but I can see it in my head and I'm doing the work to translate it in a way people can understand. There's still a lot of work to be done so feel free to stick along for the ride if it interests you.

Above all else this is my life's work. I'm prepared to be working on this for the rest of my life. And honestly keeping it a thousand with you I probably will be working on this for the rest of my life. That's just the nature of the project. I'm still gonna do it though even if I never get all that I want from it hoping that one day someone either finds this or has the same idea as me and actually reaches that height.

If you're interested in the music I make or anything else here's my linktree :D

[tagitables]

4 November 2024,

There is a magical joy in experiencing life through diverse lenses, a celebration of the paradoxes that enrich our journey. This exploration transcends mere existence, deepening our understanding and enhancing our connection to the world around us. Embracing these contradictions invites us to appreciate the complexity of life, revealing beauty in the interplay of differing perspectives.

[aroomforarchitecture]

MODELS OF BEING: IMMANENT, TRANSCENDENT, AND TRANSCENDENTAL IDEA OF BEING: 

1. ON IMMANENCE: REALIST AND IDEALIST It would not be wrong or shorthanded then to conclude that all philosophies that are a partisan of absolute existence are, like Deleuze shows, immanent philosophies. The basic assumption here is the one put forward by Parmenides: there is nothing outside existence or there is nothing outside being. Everything, every change, is but only immanent inside the…

[transmutationisms]

what do u dislike plato

deeply uninterested in any position promising access to a higher, hidden, divine realm of truth ontologically in tension with the material existence of things and their relations to one another. it's a position that appeals to supra-natural handwaving in order to resolve a perceived disjunction between perception and reality without making any effort to historicise or problematise such a disjunction, say perhaps in relation to estranged labour. kant also does this but at least he has the decency to pretend it's constitutive of human psychology and not a regulatory principle of reality in itself. i also think the ethical positions plato expresses through socrates's mouth are laughably optimistic about the existence of a pure and unconditioned truth, the human ability to perceive such a thing, and the immediate rational acceptance of it, which leads most obviously to the deeply annoying socratic solution to "why do people act against their own interests" being "they are deceived, and i don't need to prove that or engage with expressed desires that are contradictory or self-destructive, because i can simply assume these people are deceived, because if they were not then they would do the transcendentally correct thing and be happy and experience no inner conflict". politically reactionary in the way all philosophical idealism is, and more than incidentally psychiatry minded, in the sense of the etymology ψυχή ιατρεία, 'soul healing' (cf nietzsche: socrates as the "mystagogue of science", who lived and died 'scientifically', namely, delivered from the fear of death by conviction in the mission to make existence appear comprehensible and therefore justifiable).

sucks hate him think the world needs more insane unruly people unashamed to exist bodily and uninterested in extolling the virtue of self-restraint. "socially contextualise that thang" --karl marx 1844

[hungwy]

What are you reading lately?

recently finished audiobooks:

the invention of nature: alexander von humboldt's new world by andrea wulf (5/5 stars, extremely based takes for an 1800s european on the immorality of slavery, rights for indigenous people in the americas, and the negative effects of colonization on the environment. basically THE blueprint for all naturalists after him. probably one of the most beloved scientists ever)

central asia: a new history from the imperial conquests to the present by adeeb khalid (5/5 stars, just a wonderfully researched and presented book. a [necessary] focus on the role of islam, nation-building, ethnicity, and communism in central asia)

when we cease to understand the world by benjamin labatut (4/5 stars, i will never get enough of the history of quantum theory)

the art of communicating by thich nhat hanh (3/5 stars, he writes the same book every book but i still like it every time)

a brief history of equality by thomas piketty (2/5 stars, some good history but essentially a "we must discuss these problems further" book with sometimes weird possible solutions to problems. overall one obviously good point: economic reparations are necessary in many, many places)

currently reading/listening/holding/sensually imbibing:

system of transcendental idealism by fwj schelling (pdf)

a short commentary on kant's critique of pure reason by ac erwing (book)

the case against the supreme court by erwin chemerinsky (audiobook)

next on the to-read list (not in order):

non-places: an introduction to supermodernity by marc auge (admittedly a shot in the dark for whether i like it or not)

immediacy or, the style of too late capitalism by anna kornbluh (zizek and so on podcast did an interview with her that i really liked)

views of nature by alexander von humboldt (hopelessly humboldtpilled)

essays on transcendental philosophy by salomon maimon (imo kant's greatest critic and also has a cool philosophy of difference)

[borderepisteme]

“Exceptionally gifted as a pedagogue, Kracauer made Kant come alive for me. Under his guidance I experienced the work from the beginning not as mere epistemology, not as an analysis of the conditions of scientifically valid judgments, but as a kind of coded text from which the historical situation of spirit could be read, with the vague expectation that in doing so one could acquire something of truth itself. If in my later reading of traditional philosophical texts I was not so much impressed by their unity and systematic consistency as I was concerned with the play of forces at work under the surface of every closed doctrine and viewed the codified philosophies as force fields in each case, it was certainly Kracauer who impelled me to do so. As he presented it to me, Kant's critical philosophy was not simply a system of transcendental idealism. Rather, he showed me how the objective-ontological and subjective-idealist moments warred within it, how the more eloquent passages in the work are the wounds this conflict has left in the theory. From a certain point of view, the fissures and flaws in a philosophy are more essential to it than the continuity of its meaning, which most philosophies emphasize of their own accord.”

Theodor Adorno, The Curious Realist: On Siegfried Kracauer