#Supreme Court&

[googlynewstv]

پاکستان میں ایک آئینی عدالت کا قیام کیوں ضروری ہے؟

تحریر: حسن نقوی پاکستان کے عدالتی نظام میں اصلاحات کے لیے ایک اہم قدم آئینی عدالتوں کا قیام ہے۔ یہ عدالتیں وفاق اور صوبوں کے درمیان تنازعات کو حل کرنے کے لیے ایک غیر جانبدار فورم فراہم کریں گی، جو موجودہ عدالتی نظام میں ایک اہم کمی کو پورا کرے گی۔ پاکستان میں عدالتی نظام میں بہتری کی ضرورت ایک طویل عرصے سے محسوس کی جا رہی ہے، خاص طور پر اس وقت جب آئینی معاملات اور بنیادی حقوق کے تحفظ کے مسائل…

[wausaupilot]

Wisconsin Capitol Police decline to investigate leak of state Supreme Court abortion order

Investigations into the inner workings of the Wisconsin Supreme Court are rare and fraught.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Capitol Police have declined to investigate the leak of a state Supreme Court abortion order in June citing a conflict of interest, but the court’s chief justice told The Associated Press she is pursuing other options. Chief Justice Annette Ziegler told AP via email on Thursday that she continues “to pursue other means in an effort to get to the bottom of this…

[filosofablogger]

SCOTUS Screwed Up ... AGAIN!

Okay, so you’ve heard a lot of rumbling this week about ‘bump stocks’ and the Supreme Court decision killing the ban on them.  Let’s take a deeper look … First off, what exactly is a ‘bump stock’?  It is a device that can be attached to a semiautomatic firearm in place of a conventional gunstock, enabling it to fire bullets more rapidly.  Essentially, bump stocks assist rapid fire by “bumping”…

[carolinemillerbooks]

New Post has been published on Books by Caroline Miller

New Post has been published on https://www.booksbycarolinemiller.com/musings/findidng-the-golden-mean/

Findidng The Golden Mean

My U. S. Senator voted against the Ukrainian-Istreal aid package that Congress passed recently.  He said he opposed it because of  Benjamin Netanyahu’s conduct in the Gaza war.  I like my Senator. Nonetheless, I sent him an email that accused him of being long on principle, but short on common sense.  The bill he rejected included aid for the people of Gaza, victims forced to live in tents under a barrage of bombs.  We live in an imperfect world, so life requires compromises. People with pollen allergies, for example, accept that bees need clover fields to survive.       Sometimes, imperfection can […]

[laweducation]

उच्च न्यायालय एवं उच्चतम न्यायालय में अन्तर है? | High Court & Supreme Court

उच्च न्यायालय एवं उच्चतम न्यायालय भारतीय संविधान ने भारत में न्यायिक निकायों के रूप में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय और उच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना की है। भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय देश में सर्वोच्च प्राधिकार रखता है और अपील की अंतिम अदालत के रूप में कार्य करता है। दूसरी ओर, उच्च न्यायालय प्रत्येक राज्य या केंद्र शासित प्रदेश के लिए मुख्य न्यायिक निकाय के रूप में कार्य करता है। अब, आइए सर्वोच्च न्यायालय और उच्च…

[kimskashmir]

Security beefed up across Kashmir ahead of SC verdict on Article 370

SRINAGAR — Security was beefed up across Kashmir on Monday ahead of the Supreme Court’s verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution that gave a special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, officials said. Security forces have been deployed at many places in the valley to maintain law and order, they…

[lexlawuk]

Supreme Court Upholds UK Immigration Financial Requirement Threshold

In a significant ruling, the UK Supreme Court recently upheld the government’s £18,600 income threshold for foreign spouses of British citizens, deeming it a lawful requirement. However, the court also acknowledged that this policy continues to impose “significant hardship” on thousands of couples. This threshold, originally introduced during Theresa May’s time as Home Secretary, has been widely…

[nando161mando]

[legalstudiesin1]

"Bhagwandas Kedia v. Girdharilal & Co (1959)

Bhagwandas Kedia v. Girdharilal & Co is a notable case in Indian contract law. It was decided by the Supreme Court of India in 1959. In this case, the plaintiff (Bhagwandas Kedia) entered into a contract with the defendant (Girdharilal & Co) for the purchase of certain goods. The contract provided for the delivery of the goods within a certain time frame. However, the defendant failed to deliver…

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Nick Visser at HuffPost:

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a First Amendment petition filed by InfoWars host Owen Shroyer, who was sentenced to two months in prison over his role at the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

Shroyer was in Washington with InfoWars founder Alex Jones on Jan. 6 and led chants at the foot of the U.S. Capitol as hundreds of rioters listened on. At times he called Democrats “tyrants” and said the group gathered that day had declared “death to tyranny!” and “death to tyrants!” While Shroyer himself didn’t enter the Capitol, prosecutors argued during his prosecution that he ignored calls to leave and said his behavior justified a conviction. They also noted he was under a court order to stay away from the building at the time of the Jan. 6 attack. Shroyer pleaded guilty to illegally entering a restricted area on Capitol grounds last June, a misdemeanor. He was later sentenced to two months in prison with a judge noting he played a role “in amping up the crowd,” leading chants of “1776!” as the riot took place. But Shroyer asked the nation’s highest court to review his case in hopes of overturning it on First Amendment violations. He said at the time he was a “martyr for free speech.” The court did not explain its decision, which came amid a group of orders issued this week. There were no dissents or recusals noted.

SCOTUS rejects petition from far-right InfoWars employee Owen Shroyer, who was sentenced to a 2-month jail term over his role in the Jan. 6 Insurrection on 01.06.2021.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Invictus in the UK & Markle going to Manchester. Some reflections. by u/ElectricalAd9212

Invictus in the UK & Markle going to Manchester. Some reflections. The wonderful Lost Beyond Pluto in her latest video noted one thing about the RAVEC court case.Behind the words of Harry, its clear that the indignant, raging, furious, petulant, crybaby, hysterical voice of Markle is speaking.All his demands are clearly her demands. You can hear her shrill voice behind them, the outrage that she should have 24/7 security paid for by the British taxpayers because she is so supremely important.A petulant, foot stomping, arrogant narcissist who thinks the world should bow down to her.And then it happens.Harry says they had to suffer the indignity of travelling to Manchester in the train, where they would come into contact with the British publicThat is so obviously Markle speaking.She thinks it is an indignity to her to have to take public transport with the British people.She thinks she should be ferried about like Cleopatra and not have to sully herself with the filth of the lower British orders.Really telling moment of how vile she is.Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth used to catch the scheduled train to Norwich from London when she was staying in Sandringham.There are many pictures and videos of her getting off the train with the people on the platform blinking twice because Queen Elizabeth is walking on the platform.And William and Catherine use the train often.Once, a journalist went to use the bathroom on the train and when he returned his little son said he was chatting to a nice lady and he pointed to the lady and it was Catherine Princess of Wales!The other thing is Invictus.First of all, it is said Birmingham is going to host it.Really?Birmingham Council has just gone bankrupt and is cutting back services for the people, vital services like mental health provision and other things to the tune of half a billion.And they're goin to spend millions of their peoples needed money as a bankrupt council to fluff for Meghan Markle?Are they mad?And of course Harry wants the money of a city that is bankrupt, he has no consideration of the suffering of ordinary people.But that is only one thing.The main thing in their calculations is to harass the Royal Family.They will want to force the Royal Family to attend the Invictus Games.Vile psychopathic schemers and malevolent narcissists.Most of all they want William there.No way.The govt should intervene and tell Birmingham to back out and spare their taxpayers.But if they do, William should stay away and have nothing to do with it.The British people support him over the psychotic stalkers.And if tickets are available I'm sure lots of good loyal Britons can make their feelings known about Harry and Markle in their presence if the farcical events occur in BirminghamGod Save The King.Her Late Majesty Queen Elizabeth alighting at Kings Lynn train station with her beloved people post link: https://ift.tt/Gh90cPt author: ElectricalAd9212 submitted: March 01, 2024 at 10:17PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit

[r0bita]

There is an ongoing petition to limit the term of Supreme Court Justices.

Not certain how far it'll go, but a push on this could be for the better anyway.

[wausaupilot]

Wisconsin Supreme Court will decide whether mobile voting sites are legal

The state Supreme Court announced Friday that it will decide whether mobile voting sites are legal without allowing any lower appellate courts to rule first.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The state Supreme Court announced Friday that it will decide whether mobile voting sites are legal without allowing any lower appellate courts to rule first. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative law firm, sued in December 2022 on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chair Ken Brown, alleging Racine city officials illegally used a voting van to…

[filosofablogger]

Welcome To The United States of Lunacy

Isn’t it funny (and I don’t mean in a ‘ha ha’ sort of way) that if you mention the word ‘abortion’, people are all up in arms about the “killing” of a fetus, but those same people are supportive of giving everyone the right to kill with guns. Last year, the Supreme Court struck down New York’s law that required people seeking a license to carry a handgun in public to demonstrate that they had a…

[carolinemillerbooks]

New Post has been published on Books by Caroline Miller

New Post has been published on https://www.booksbycarolinemiller.com/musings/findidng-the-golden-mean/

Findidng The Golden Mean

My U. S. Senator voted against the Ukrainian-Istreal aid package that Congress passed recently.  He said he opposed it because of  Benjamin Netanyahu’s conduct in the Gaza war.  I like my Senator. Nonetheless, I sent him an email that accused him of being long on principle, but short on common sense.  The bill he rejected included aid for the people of Gaza, victims forced to live in tents under a barrage of bombs.  We live in an imperfect world, so life requires compromises. People with pollen allergies, for example, accept that bees need clover fields to survive.       Sometimes, imperfection can be a positive force. Donald Trump’s flawed presidency has taught us that our 235-year-old Constitution may do more than guarantee equality for all.  If the Supreme Court upholds Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, it will mean our head of state is a monarch able to commit any crime without fear of consequences.  The High Court considered Presidential immunity concerning civil conduct three decards ago. A case in 1982 involving Richard Nixon ended with a decision that gave a sitting President a degree of absolution. The  Constitution makes no mention of that, but the judges based their findings on the Speech or Debate section of the document.  It grants civil immunity to members of Congress.  Trump pushes the envelope when he argues that immunity extends to Presidential crimes.  If the integrity of some jurists deciding Trump’s case weren’t also in disrepute, all might be well. But the High Court has been slow to promulgate rules of conduct for itself and members like  Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas have shown little inclination to police themselves. A citizen may wonder how these appointed jurists came to hold their sweeping authority over the Executive and Legislative branches of government.  Article 111 of the Constitution restricts them to disputes between the states or those arising among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers. Their expanded authority arose from Maybury v. Madison. In 1801, before leaving office,  President John Adams commissioned William Maybury to be a justice of the peace.  Adams’s successor, James Madison, refused to deliver the appointment, so Marbury sued.  Taking the Federal government to court was novel, so before hearing the argument, the Supreme Court had to determine if it had jurisdiction. Chief Justice John Marshall decided that Maybury’s petition raised a legal question, so the Court could rule. That opinion which was never challenged was far-reaching.  The Constitution, being silent on the matter, Marshall and his cohorts chose to reserve for themselves extraordinary power over the two other branches of government.    Article 111 does offer a defense against an overreaching judiciary.  Court-stripping permits Congress to limit or reduce a state court’s jurisdiction in federal matters except for those originally granted.  The remedy poses complications that I’m not qualified to discuss. What matters is that besides Court-stripping, Congress has only one other way to assert its authority.  It can write new legislation.  If a bill fails, the judicial ruling stands. Because the High Court chooses the cases it hears, its involvement can seem political.  For example, when it overturned Roe v. Wade   with its almost 50-year-old standing, members of the public were outraged and called for a change in that body’s  composition, either by adding to the number of members or imposing term limits Times of social and political upheaval can encourage extremism. Some people become heated enough to demand a scorched earth policy and let democracy be damned.  Those of us standing in the middle watch in awe.  Fortunately, enough of us exist to enforce the Golden Mean. At once a mathematical and philosophical construct, the Golden Mean, which also exists in nature,  calls for a middle way–living without the extremes of excess and deficiency. It teaches that compromise enables inclusion.  In ancient thought, it defined a moral life. When my Senator rejected aid for Gaza because the package was imperfect, he abandoned the middle way.  He also forgot two important truths. First, he forgot that Israel is our ally and the only democracy in the Middle East. Its citizens deserve our support regardless of Netanyahu’s crimes.  He will answer for his conduct in his country’s next election and, eventually, at the International Criminal Court in Haag. Second, my Senator forgot that imperfection attends to every human endeavor.  Purity is the posture of angels and those who imagine they are.

[originalistideas]

🔥🔥🚨🚨BREAKING🚨🚨🔥🔥

The stage is now SET The Supreme Court has just ruled it unconstitutional for vaccine mandates. This sets the stage for class action lawsuits which will or should dribble down to the DINOSAUR in the room

BIG PHARMA AND THE INJURIES IT CAUSED.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/queensland/supreme-court-bombshell-qlds-mandatory-covid-vaccine-orders-unlawful/news-story/4dcc6ca18dae261249fd7988642192fb?amp&nk=3d842d4709a4eacb8e4e3a7aa00fc74b-1709048337