#Stalin’s regime
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Aziraphale vs Shostakovich
For a long time now I wanted to write something about Aziraphale's choice to listen to Shostakovich at the beginning of S2. Shostakovich is not an 18th century composer as some joke about Aziraphale being stuck in the past. He's not a romantic, sweet composer either. But a composer who wrote most of his work in the middle of 20th Century. Under the oppressive Soviet regime of Stalin and more.
There's so much about...the way he lived and worked, in constant fear, that just, begs to be compared to how Aziraphale feels. I just never felt I knew enough about Shostakovich to make a post about him and do it justice. I still don't. But. I was listening to this classical music and history course today - not focused on Symphony No. 5 (1937) that Aziraphale was listening to, but Symphony No. 13 (1962) - written in the brief 'Thaw' of Khrushchev, who condemned Stalin's just ended, rule of terror. The professor (Robert Greene - all his courses are amazing btw) nails it when he describes how Shostakovich's career felt:
There's a lot more in the whole chapter but I was struck by how Aziraphale copes and has coped with living in fear, in terror for 6000 years (and much more, since we see him worried in Before the Beginning too). Not just for himself, but like everyone in Russia, for his loved ones too.
Imagine. Living in terror of your friends being taken away. Your spouse. Your parents.. Of you being found a traitor and executed. Afraid of talking to anyone, about anything. Constantly having to praise the regime you live in or you will disappear. Never knowing who is watching. Who is listening.
Constantly. Afraid. Of. A. Knock. At. The. Door.
49 notes
·
View notes
Note
What did you think of the first episode of The Regime? I'm not sure what to make of it yet.
Neither am I—I really hope that it comes into its own and doesn't rely as much on the Veep and Succession house blend. Kinda digging Elena and Herbert's Kronk and Yzma thing, though.
#girl in cookie monster pajamas and her simp familiar is a dynamic of all time#one thing i loved about the death of stalin is that iannucci didn't just copy paste a satire of american or british politics into 1953#he demonstrated an understanding of a distinct flavor of soviet-era satire—a chimera of literal and figurative gallows humor#i hope we get to see some of that here#that is to say—i hope it employs central europe as more than a set dressing and plays with cultural and historical context#anonymous#assbox#the regime
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
I fucking HATE communism if you are a commie GO AWAY
/very VERY srs
#literally fuck you communism doesnt work it is just authoritarian regimes#“but thats not real communism!” yes it fucking is and it never worked once and most commies support russia#shove that hammer and sickle up your ass you people like to bootlick dictators#“stalin did nothing!” oh yea totally he just starved millions of people on accident i guess#and oppressed eastern europe for decades but of course that doesnt matter to u seriously u people are idiots why dont u open a history book
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
You know, whatever you say about the Soviet Union, they did, on average, change dictators more often than democratic Russia does. Mostly because they kept giving all the power to senile alcoholics who'd already had their first stroke, but who am I to judge, if that's what it takes for Russian politicians to respect some kinda term limits, then so be it
#personal rant#russia#ussr#stalin ruled for 25 years#if putin's regime survives 2025 he's gonna beat his record#I don't think there's any chance he's gonna beat catherine the great's whooping 34 years in power though
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
This week on a whim I decided to start a book filled with interviews discussing what it was like to live through the fall of the USSR and trying to reconcile that past with the 'present' situation in Russia (the book came out in 2015 I think) and I'm so glad I picked it up, because this is the first thing I've read in a long time that has genuinely changed me as a person and the way I think about my life. There are so many touching tales about humanity and hope and cruelty and having to live and cope with bitter disappointment and unchangeable situations outside of your control and it speaks so much to what it feels like to be alive today, even though the interviews took place in the 90s/early 2000s and I've never lived through anything like what the people in this book have experienced. I'm not even halfway through this book, the audio version is nearly 24 hours long!! But it's been consuming me with Thoughts and I just needed to get some of them out
#also it's helped me understand how Russian politics have become what they are today#like it makes so much sense now#personal shite#there are just so many moments where I'll just have to pause and remind myself that the things these people are saying really did happen#that this was actually something a large part of humanity went through#people recounting their experiences living through the war and living under Stalin#and the way some of them went though all that and still strongly supported the communist regime and everything#it's a real testament to the human condition#the book is called Secondhand Time by Svetlana Alexeivitch btw
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
.
#still not over the insane george orwell post that got reblogged onto my dash yesterday#i unfollowed the person who reblogged it#because either A) theyre a tankie or B) their criticial thinking skills are sub-fucking-zero#like 1) the OP of that post was just copying Hakims awful video on Orwell#2) to read animal farm and come out of it with the interpretation that Orwell was saying that the animals and hence the proletariat in the#USSR were just innately unintelligent shows a reading comprehension so bad its not even like piss poor. its piss impoverished#3) if a post is like ''also look X said Y Bad Thing'' without providing any of the context as to where that quote comes from theyre likely#being deliberately mishonest. it is easy to take someone out if context to make it look like they were saying something they werent which is#exactly what the OP of that post was doing. they took one sentence of Orwells writing on the nazis and Hitler to make it look like Orwell#thought Hitler was a swell guy when actually Orwells writing was about the dangers of charismatic tyrants like Hitler and their rhetoric#the entire thing was about how Hitler was able to amass such power and popularity and use that to his advantage#not every despot is so easy to pick out as dangerous or so easy to detest. hitler was hardly the first charismatic tyrant in history#OP also conveniently left out the fact that like the next sentence is orwell being like yeah no i would fucking kill this man which wow#thats a glaring omission. imagine if people decided to look up what OP was refetencing to verify irs veracity#4) OP does not mention that Orwell fought in La Guerra Civil alongside communists and socialists and anarchists etc.#he fought against the nationalists. he took a bullet to the neck during the fight. he was very much against francisco franco and his fascist#regime who were allied with Hitler and the Nazis#mentioning orwells participation in the spanish civil war really undercuts any of those arguments#5) you know who was actually allied with Hitler and Nazi Germany? STALIN#at the beginning of WWII the soviet union and nazi germany were in alliance. stalin and hitler did not have fundamental ideological#differences. if hitler had not betrayed stalin the soviet union would not have joined the allied powers#your uwu anti-fascist communist idol joseph fucking stalin was joseph fucking stalin. he was a fascist dictator whose actions deliberately#caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. he like vladimir lenin before him did not care for the ideals of marx#marxism leninism is a meaningless political ideology#the soviet union was not a communist paradise. neither stalin not lenin cared about the proletariat#i said this in my tag ramble yesterday but if you want to see a leader who actually followed marxist ideals go look up thomas sankara#im just rambling in the tags today to get out the lingering frustration i have
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
#ITOLDYou! #Podcast S-2 #SeasonPremiere! #Understanding the #witting & #unwitting #insider #threats. They are #responsible for all this #geopolitical #insanity.
#Watch here https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dal8pIpcH9E…
#Learn More https://halflifecrisis.com/hlc-articles/understand-the-insider-threats-against-the-usa…
#Identify if #YOU are that #insiderthreat!
#half life crisis#baqueroalvarez#authoritarianism#propaganda#trump#politics#kamala harris#author#insiderthreat#trump is a threat to democracy#threat detection#threat to democracy#threat management#threat assessment#arrest#lying#trumps#authoritarian state#anti authoritarian#authoritarian regimes#authoritarian parenting#wilfulignorance#totalitarianism#totalitarian regime#stalin#soviet union#soviet russia#russian#ukrainian history#post soviet
0 notes
Text
reminder for the millionth time: never read tumblr recomended posts about politics
#like im really not an expert on politics or any of this stuff but#like one side is the obvious bullshit constant posts by american far right extremists a lot of which are bots#which keep appearing cause i clicked on an american politics tag literally once cause i was curious about trump being shot at#the other side is the literally weirdest takes on socialism and communism and stuff also looking like theyre from some sort of extremists#like again im really not an expert but some of the stuff they say does sound a bit odd#sometimes it feels like theyre just going a bit too far overcompensating for stuff people believe about communist regimes#but sometimes when theyre like actually stalinism was great and didnt kill millions of people its like um#yes the west definitely overeggagerates how bad it was compared to western countries but#you know it isnt just one or the other like do these people understand the concept of nuance#actually its weird causr they often read like they do thet just think so and so famous communist dictator was great anyway#i mean the vast majority of people on tumblr are probably really closer to me some sort of normal left#like more left than labour but not into extremist communist authoritarianism#like its so dumb how people are like oglh its left wing it cant be authoritarian#like literally most of my politics knowledge comes from school ive literally taken one module at uni#of course theres all sorts of people in the world who have all sorts of ideas about politics#some of which are a lot weirder to me than others#its just weird that so many of these posts keep showing up in my recvomended#which is full of rubbish but thats tumblr isnt it the whole website is thats why theys not really any blogs i follow im not actually intere#also all that american politics discourse im particularly relieved to know nothing about and only be seeing the tip of the iceberg
0 notes
Text
My favorite thing about this:
Is the Iranian regime crying like a bunch of little bitches that their shooting at another country got a full-scale reprisal for the first time since 1988 and their technology that helps Russia in its bid to murder 44 million Ukrainians was utterly feckless in stopping it. Classic Khameini, talk shit, get hit, cry like a bitch.
#iran#pakistan#fuck the ayatollah and the pakistani regime both#a true hitler vs stalin for our times
0 notes
Text
cause of death people refusing to ever factor historical nuance and complexity
#inspired by the worst take ive ever seen in the shostakovich soviet attitude debate#aka i saw someone say shostakovichs 'patriotic' works paint him as a supporter of the soviet union GO OUTSIDE ?#wow its almost like joseph stalin and his regime served as a constant threat to shostakovichs Life#his second symphony is patriotic for a Reason ob my ngolfdd#look up the anecdotes of shosty at the macbeth opera stalin attended and also Go Outside#THIS IS LITERALLY SO SIMPLE??????
1 note
·
View note
Text
one of the lesser known policies enforced by stalin during his totalitarian regime was mandatory, daily petting sessions. under the looming threat of severe punishment, expulsion from the party, and even execution, the entire politburo would be forced to come together and engage in the act of petting the head of their supreme leader, sometimes even scratching behind his ears. these sessions would often last several minutes up to even one or two hours in extreme cases, and individual members were often too terrified to be the first to stop, out of fear that he might stop purring
295 notes
·
View notes
Text
Singing
I feel, we as a fandom, don’t talk enough about Aziraphale's singing.
Maybe he's not much into whatever pop/rock sensation is currently in most humans earphones*, but we know that he used to be a music tutor and therefore surely knows many great tunes.
On top of that, his music taste isn't as ancient as some might think... yes he likes classical music, but contrary to some opinions of it, not all of it is from 18th century. The symphony (number 5) he buys from Maggie at the beginning of S2 was written in 1937 by Dimitri Shostakovich who had a turbulent life (it being the 1930s AND trying to survive in Stalin's cruel regime).
The piece the Bentley plays for Azi when he asks for music on his way to Edinburgh is one of my favourite pieces of music called Danse Macbre by Saint-Saëns, the opening of which Wikipedia describes thus:
The piece opens with a harp playing a single note, D, twelve times (the twelve strokes of midnight) which is accompanied by soft chords from the string section. The solo violin enters playing the tritone, which was known as the diabolus in musica ("the Devil in music") during the Medieval and Baroque eras, consisting of an A and an E♭—in an example of scordatura tuning, the violinist's E string has actually been tuned down to an E♭ to create the dissonant tritone.
Aziraphale is also clearly aware of the film and the music + songs from The Sound of Music (1965) and Aziraphale, living in Soho as he does, I bet is a great lover of not just drama in theatre, but also musicals.
Therefore it is not a huge reach to conclude he would knows some fabulous songs to sing while making himself a pot of tea and a cup of coffee for Crowley on one the countless idyllic mornings in their cottage. Nor is it a stretch to assume that he loves to sing Crowley to sleep, playing with his hair as he does so, much like we all love to see in art and fics that this wonderful fandom provides.
So my question is, what does Aziraphale love to sing? Is it Maria from West Side Story? Singing in the Rain?
Does he love Jesus Christ Superstar (much like he loves his collection of misprinted Bibles)? Did he and Crowley go see Hamilton?
I also think they would have a huge collection of instruments in their cottage, perhaps even a beautiful grand piano... that, of course, they both can play. *but neither is the Bentley, who plays Queen to Crowley basically indiscriminately, even though he tries to play other things when driving. Whether he tried to play music in his car before the 70s, I'm not sure we know?
#good omens#good omens meta#just let me dream ok#south downs cottage#singing#music#aziraphale#crowley#ineffable husbands#good omens thoughts#kaypost
227 notes
·
View notes
Text
The exhibition at Washington’s Ukraine House dedicated to the Holodomor genocide. Source: UkrInform
---
Washington’s Ukrainian House has opened an exhibition showcasing the survival meals that kept Ukrainians alive during Holodomor: oak bark soup, potato peel pancakes mixed with grass and flax seeds, and grass bread, according to UkrInform. The Holodomor, a famine that struck Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933, stands as one of the most devastating events in Ukrainian history, resulting in the deaths of millions of Ukrainians. The Soviet regime orchestrated this artificial famine under Joseph Stalin, who implemented extreme grain procurement policies that led to widespread starvation. The policies aimed to suppress Ukrainian nationalism and resistance to Soviet control. In 2006, Ukraine officially recognized the Holodomor as genocide against the Ukrainian people. The designation has been supported by numerous countries, although it remains contested by some, notably Russia. During this period, the Soviet government confiscated grain and other food supplies from Ukrainian peasants while imposing impossibly high quotas for grain production. As a result, millions were left without food or means of survival. Historical estimates of the death toll vary widely, with figures ranging from 3.5 million to as many as 10 million victims. Activists in Washington have recreated some of the meals that Ukrainians ate to survive in order to draw Americans’ attention to the tragic page in Ukraine’s history.
“At the exhibition’s center, visitors can see a soup made from pinecones, twigs, and oak bark. We also recreated potato peel pancakes mixed with grass and flax seeds. In some regions of Ukraine, flour was mixed with grass to bake flatbreads"
The exhibit is open at the Ukraine House in Washington DC until the end of November.
Source: Oak bark soup, potato peels, pancakes with grass: Holodomor survival meals on display at exhibition in Washington
#Ukraine#holodomor#holodomor remembrance day#Ukrainian history#russia is a terrorist state#Ukrainian House#Washington DC#article in link
178 notes
·
View notes
Text
Rhetoric has a history. The words democracy and tyranny were debated in ancient Greece; the phrase separation of powers became important in the 17th and 18th centuries. The word vermin, as a political term, dates from the 1930s and ’40s, when both fascists and communists liked to describe their political enemies as vermin, parasites, and blood infections, as well as insects, weeds, dirt, and animals. The term has been revived and reanimated, in an American presidential campaign, with Donald Trump’s description of his opponents as “radical-left thugs” who “live like vermin.”
This language isn’t merely ugly or repellant: These words belong to a particular tradition. Adolf Hitler used these kinds of terms often. In 1938, he praised his compatriots who had helped “cleanse Germany of all those parasites who drank at the well of the despair of the Fatherland and the People.” In occupied Warsaw, a 1941 poster displayed a drawing of a louse with a caricature of a Jewish face. The slogan: “Jews are lice: they cause typhus.” Germans, by contrast, were clean, pure, healthy, and vermin-free. Hitler once described the Nazi flag as “the victorious sign of freedom and the purity of our blood.”
Stalin used the same kind of language at about the same time. He called his opponents the “enemies of the people,” implying that they were not citizens and that they enjoyed no rights. He portrayed them as vermin, pollution, filth that had to be “subjected to ongoing purification,” and he inspired his fellow communists to employ similar rhetoric. In my files, I have the notes from a 1955 meeting of the leaders of the Stasi, the East German secret police, during which one of them called for a struggle against “vermin activities” (there is, inevitably, a German word for this: Schädlingstätigkeiten), by which he meant the purge and arrest of the regime’s critics. In this same era, the Stasi forcibly moved suspicious people away from the border with West Germany, a project nicknamed “Operation Vermin.”
This kind of language was not limited to Europe. Mao Zedong also described his political opponents as “poisonous weeds.” Pol Pot spoke of “cleansing” hundreds of thousands of his compatriots so that Cambodia would be “purified.”
In each of these very different societies, the purpose of this kind of rhetoric was the same. If you connect your opponents with disease, illness, and poisoned blood, if you dehumanize them as insects or animals, if you speak of squashing them or cleansing them as if they were pests or bacteria, then you can much more easily arrest them, deprive them of rights, exclude them, or even kill them. If they are parasites, they aren’t human. If they are vermin, they don’t get to enjoy freedom of speech, or freedoms of any kind. And if you squash them, you won’t be held accountable.
Until recently, this kind of language was not a normal part of American presidential politics. Even George Wallace’s notorious, racist, neo-Confederate 1963 speech, his inaugural speech as Alabama governor and the prelude to his first presidential campaign, avoided such language. Wallace called for “segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” But he did not speak of his political opponents as “vermin” or talk about them poisoning the nation’s blood. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps following the outbreak of World War II, spoke of “alien enemies” but not parasites.
In the 2024 campaign, that line has been crossed. Trump blurs the distinction between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants—the latter including his wife, his late ex-wife, the in-laws of his running mate, and many others. He has said of immigrants, “They’re poisoning the blood of our country” and “They’re destroying the blood of our country.” He has claimed that many have “bad genes.” He has also been more explicit: “They’re not humans; they’re animals”; they are “cold-blooded killers.” He refers more broadly to his opponents—American citizens, some of whom are elected officials—as “the enemy from within … sick people, radical-left lunatics.” Not only do they have no rights; they should be “handled by,” he has said, “if necessary, National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.”
In using this language, Trump knows exactly what he is doing. He understands which era and what kind of politics this language evokes. “I haven’t read Mein Kampf,” he declared, unprovoked, during one rally—an admission that he knows what Hitler’s manifesto contains, whether or not he has actually read it. “If you don’t use certain rhetoric,” he told an interviewer, “if you don’t use certain words, and maybe they’re not very nice words, nothing will happen.”
His talk of mass deportation is equally calculating. When he suggests that he would target both legal and illegal immigrants, or use the military arbitrarily against U.S. citizens, he does so knowing that past dictatorships have used public displays of violence to build popular support. By calling for mass violence, he hints at his admiration for these dictatorships but also demonstrates disdain for the rule of law and prepares his followers to accept the idea that his regime could, like its predecessors, break the law with impunity.
These are not jokes, and Trump is not laughing. Nor are the people around him. Delegates at the Republican National Convention held up prefabricated signs: Mass Deportation Now. Just this week, when Trump was swaying to music at a surreal rally, he did so in front of a huge slogan: Trump Was Right About Everything. This is language borrowed directly from Benito Mussolini, the Italian fascist. Soon after the rally, the scholar Ruth Ben-Ghiat posted a photograph of a building in Mussolini’s Italy displaying his slogan: Mussolini Is Always Right.
These phrases have not been put on posters and banners at random in the final weeks of an American election season. With less than three weeks left to go, most candidates would be fighting for the middle ground, for the swing voters. Trump is doing the exact opposite. Why? There can be only one answer: because he and his campaign team believe that by using the tactics of the 1930s, they can win. The deliberate dehumanization of whole groups of people; the references to police, to violence, to the “bloodbath” that Trump has said will unfold if he doesn’t win; the cultivation of hatred not only against immigrants but also against political opponents—none of this has been used successfully in modern American politics.
But neither has this rhetoric been tried in modern American politics. Several generations of American politicians have assumed that American voters, most of whom learned to pledge allegiance to the flag in school, grew up with the rule of law, and have never experienced occupation or invasion, would be resistant to this kind of language and imagery. Trump is gambling—knowingly and cynically—that we are not.
231 notes
·
View notes
Text
the tankies dont want you to know this: under stalin’s regime, citizens were forced to refer to stalin with she/her. punishable by death
140 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has died in jail, the country’s prison service has said, in what is likely to be seen as a political assassination attributable to Vladimir Putin.
Navalny, 47, one of Putin’s most visible and persistent critics, was being held in a jail about 40 miles north of the Arctic Circle where he had been sentenced to 19 years under a “special regime”. In a video from the prison in January, he had appeared gaunt with his head shaved.
The Kremlin said it had no information on the cause of death.
In early December he had disappeared from a prison in the Vladimir region, where he was serving a 30-year sentence on extremism and fraud charges that he had called political retribution for leading the anti-Kremlin opposition of the 2010s. He did not expect to be released during Putin’s lifetime.
A former nationalist politician, Navalny helped foment the 2011-12 protests in Russia by campaigning against election fraud and government corruption, investigating Putin’s inner circle and sharing the findings in slick videos that garnered hundreds of millions of views.
The high-water mark in his political career came in 2013, when he won 27% of the vote in a Moscow mayoral contest that few believed was free or fair. He remained a thorn in the side of the Kremlin for years, identifying a palace built on the Black Sea for Putin’s personal use, mansions and yachts used by the ex-president Dmitry Medvedev, and a sex worker who linked a top foreign policy official with a well-known oligarch.
In 2020, Navalny fell into a coma after a suspected poisoning using novichok by Russia’s FSB security service and was evacuated to Germany for treatment. He recovered and returned to Russia in January 2021, where he was arrested on a parole violation charge and sentenced to his first of several jail terms that would total more than 30 years behind bars.
Putin has recently launched a presidential campaign for his fifth term in office. He is already the longest-serving Russian leader since Joseph Stalin and could surpass him if he runs again for office in 2030, a possibility since he had the constitutional rules on term limits rewritten in 2020.
336 notes
·
View notes