#Rishi Patel

[freedom-barricades-bighero16]

Granville: Mr. Patel, I would need to speak to your parents.

Rishi: One second.

(Rishi leaves, and comes back into Granville's office a few minutes later with Hiro and Karmi)

Rishi: They are my parents, Professor Granville!

Granville: ......

[gimigimimore]

Ideas on Regina, Aiko, and Rishi's lab.

Hiro and Karmi have their own labs, but that does not stop them from visiting the shared labs.

Regina will take over Honey's part of the shared labs. Which makes sense she is also a chemistry major.

Aiko will take Wasabi's part of the shared labs since she will use it to make and develop her power purse and her creator's gloves. She would also make her tags in there.

Rishi will take over Gogo's lab as HC: He likes speed. He would also use it to upgrade his tablet, make something new, and upgrade his hoverboard.

I will start making the concept of their respective labs in Bloxburg.

[najaitspurple]

Here are the episode titles and synopsis for episodes 1- 10!

1. Back to Reality - Hiro's first day back to school gets awry when his newfound friends accidentally uncover his superhero identity. Meanwhile, someone else has other plans.

2. Friends In-Training - Determined to help their Big Hero 6 friends on a mission, Rishi and Aiko train themselves.

3. Baymax and Rishi - Rishi looks after Baymax while he and his friends prepare for a parade.

4. Dolphin Date/Professors Two:

Dolphin Date - Hiro and Karmi went on a date to the aquarium.

Professors Two - Professor Granville tells Aiko and Megan about how she worked with Professor Callaghan years back.

5. Bad Luck Alley - Regina's friends are worried when she decides to go to Good Luck Alley by herself.

6. Jack Return - When Fred goes on his first date with Olivia, he nearly exposes his superhero identity; The Mad Jacks return to their life of crime.

7. Nega-Globby Strikes Back - After an argument, Aiko and Nega-Globby find themselves trapped in the hounds of Muirahara Woods.

8. Call of the Woods/Tumble Fight: (Takes place after e10)

Call of the Woods - Hiro and Chief Cruz retell the story of how they got stranded in the woods when their vehicle breaks down.

Tumble Fight - When the base gets infiltrated by the Fujitas, Aiko must overcome a looming past.

9. Knox's Revelation - When Hiro visits Orso Knox, he discovers something; Regina tries to fix her friendship with Honey Lemon.

10. Super Sleuth Megan Cruz - When Megan agrees to help the team investigate tech-related burglaries, they discover a new trio of villainous sisters: The Fujitas.

Episode premiere dates: Time depends on when I will be available, and I will post a batch of new episodes (Except the season premiere) every saturday followed by a hiatus.

2/16

2/24

2/24

NOTICE: Due to writing conflicts, episodes 4 to 10 will be delayed until further notice! But I can give you hints for these.

[rishukumariworld-blog]

Steve Smith Plucks a Blinder to Dismiss Rehan Ahmed in County Championship 2023

Known for his exceptional fur chops and tremendous fielding capacities, Steve Smith captured the attention of justice suckers with a stirring one-handed catch in the County Championship Division Two institution between Sussex and Leicestershire Smith displayed his fielding prowess by getting relieved of Leicestershire’s all-rounder, Rehan Ahmed. It all happened during the 59th over of…

[sprnklersplashes]

I am going to say one more thing on this topic and then I am done and that is that the attacker has been confirmed as being of Rwandan descent and that the British media and the British public are having a field day with it. They when his race was still unknown but they are going even further with it now that it is confirmed.

Do not let them. This country is home to a bunch of racist, xenophobic freaks a lot of whom are in the government who will do anything to push their agenda. Including hijacking a tragedy before the girls are even buried.

Protect your non-white friends, family and community members and call this shit out when you see it.

[listen-to-the-inner-walrus]

[ALT Text: Supreme court rejects Rishi Sunak’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda

Judges uphold appeal court ruling over risk to deported refugees and deals blow to PM’s ‘stop the boats’ strategy]

how many times does this policy have to be blocked on account of it abusing human rights laws before the tories finally fucking drop it? [x]

[tweetingukpolitics]

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Ellen Ioanes at Vox:

The UK is again preparing to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda after Parliament created a workaround to enact a policy the high court declared unlawful.

Authorities have begun detaining migrants to deport to Rwanda under the revamped plan. But the policy faces major logistical issues, humanitarian concerns, and the likelihood that a future Labour government will scrap it. Former Home Secretary Priti Patel initially proposed the controversial law in 2022 as a way to reduce irregular migration, particularly via small boats across the English Channel, which is on the rise in the UK. Her successor, Suella Braverman, also advocated for the plan until she was fired in 2023; Prime Minister Rishi Sunak then vowed to “stop the boats” and promised that the policy would become law. Sunak succeeded on the latter front. Following legal challenges that saw the UK Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights declare the proposal unlawful, a bill declaring Rwanda safe for migrants and that limits the courts’ ability to adjudicate the country’s safety was approved as law by King Charles in late April, despite heavy opposition from the House of Lords. The government published a video on May 1 showing law enforcement authorities detaining people to send to the East African country as soon as July.

The law has been resoundingly criticized by human rights advocates, immigration lawyers, and Labour politicians who say it violates international law and is, to quote shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, “an expensive gimmick.” The law is part of a broader effort by Sunak and his Conservative Party to burnish their image as their government struggles to maintain support in the lead-up to a national election. Irregular migration has increased in recent years, but it’s not the driver of the problems that the UK is facing, including ongoing cost-of-living and housing crises. However, it is among voters’ top concerns, making the extreme anti-immigration law an appealing policy for a dysfunctional party struggling to maintain power.

[...]

The UK’s Rwanda deportation policy, briefly explained

The Rwanda plan has been a policy priority for two years now, and it’s outlived two prime ministers and two home secretaries. The ostensible goal? To deter irregular migrations via the English Channel and other routes, ostensibly for the migrants’ own safety, and to disrupt human trafficking operations.

Though the government has declared Rwanda a safe country through its recent legislation, it is the threat of being sent there instead of potentially receiving asylum in the UK that is meant to deter people from entering the country. Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame claimed that his country was simply trying to help out with “a very complicated problem all over the world” when Rwanda and the UK struck their initial agreement in 2022. But Rwanda will be well compensated by the British government for its purported generosity (more on that later). And critics say it also benefits Rwanda reputationally despite Kagame’s autocratic tendencies (which include threatening or jailing political rivals, repression of the media, and changing the constitution to extend his rule), not to mention the UK government’s own concerns that Rwanda is not a safe place for LGBTQ refugees.

But immigration has become a key policy pillar for the conservative government post-Brexit. Former Prime Ministers Boris Johnson and Liz Truss, along with Sunak, all touted their tough stance on immigration, hoping to appeal to socially conservative party members who see immigration as a key issue. Sunak and Truss backed the Rwanda plan, which was first proposed by controversial former Home Secretary Priti Patel. The policy was deeply controversial from the start. It applies to the roughly 52,000 asylum seekers the government deems to have entered the UK illegally after January 2022. Under international law, everyone has the right to seek asylum, and countries are obligated to protect people in their territory seeking asylum under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. The UK was one of the original signatories to that convention.

But under the new rule, regardless of whether their claims are valid, asylum seekers can now be detained, and forced to fly to Rwanda, where their asylum claims will ostensibly be processed and they will be resettled. The plan “is effectively removing the UK from the asylum convention, because it removes the right to asylum which is explicitly guaranteed,” Peter William Walsh, senior researcher at the Oxford Migration Observatory, told Vox in an interview. It also could change the UK’s legal structure: the UK has threatened to withdraw from the court’s jurisdiction should it rule against the Rwanda plan.

[...]

Costs are already adding up; though no one has been sent to Rwanda and just a handful detained, the UK has already paid Rwanda 220 million pounds (about $270 million) to create infrastructure for asylum seeker processing. That number could skyrocket to more than half a billion pounds total (about $627 million) to send just 300 people to the East African country, according to a UK government watchdog.

Because of objections from advocacy groups, the UK Supreme Court, and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), no migrant in the UK has ever been transferred to Rwanda under the plan. (One migrant has been sent to Rwanda voluntarily under a separate policy that pays eligible migrants 3,000 pounds if they volunteer to be sent to the country.) As seven people awaited deportation to Rwanda in June of 2022, the ECHR intervened and issued injunctions stopping the migrants’ removal and pausing the controversial policy. Though the UK left the European Union in 2020, it is still part of the Council of Europe, which the ECHR has jurisdiction over, making the court’s decision legally binding. And in November 2023, the UK’s highest court ruled the scheme unlawful.

Sunak, however, doubled down on the Rwanda policy, introducing emergency legislation to have Parliament declare Rwanda a safe country, as well as working on a new treaty with Rwanda to address the court’s concerns that asylum-seekers might be sent back to their home countries. That legislation, the Safety of Rwanda Act, passed Parliament in late April and unilaterally declared Rwanda to be a safe place to resettle migrants, paving the way for King Charles’s approval and the Home Office’s moves to detain some migrants who arrived by irregular routes.

The United Kingdom’s highly controversial Rwanda deportation plan proposed in a bid to curb unauthorized immigration to the nation has already ignited controversy.

The UK cannot wait for the Tories to be gone.

[bottlesandbarricades]

the girls are fighting

[painless-innit-colourful]

my first time ever making one of these I had to do this conversation my friend group had over a year ago about the government's Rwanda plan

[changing-my-username]

Her shadow chancellor you mean

[gimigimimore]

Just got bored so I decided to give Aiko a hidden talent/hobby.

Whenever Aiko is bored, she makes random keychains out of clay. She even made her own which includes her first name. She then would make one for her friends and sister, with the number of beads changing depending on their first name.

Hiro (as shown in the pic) - 4

Baymax - 6

Fred - 4

Gogo - 4

Honey - 5

Wasabi - 6

Regina - 6

Karmi - 5

Rishi - 5

[najaitspurple]

Not the first time I went late with posting...

[bauliya]

Dev patel’s family is sanghi? Weren’t they born in Kenya?

that was a joke on my part because UC gujjus are BJP’s strongest base but I’m concerned you don’t think Africa-born Indians can be sanghis.. the Afro-Carribean Indian diaspora is very stringently divided across caste lines with oppressed caste indians mostly sent over as indentured labour and wealthier merchant/upper caste Hindus acting as managerial staff to colonial powers and cornering industrial and professional opportunities while oppressing Black people after independence.

[insidecroydon]

From Croydon to Peckham, activists stand by asylum seekers

The civil disobedience action aimed at frustrating, delaying or even stopping altogether the removal of asylum seekers from their accommodation in south London on to other locations, including deportation to Rwanda, has shifted from Croydon’s Lunar House to Peckham today. Bus busted: the delays to the coach at a refugee hostel in Peckham saw it eventually leave empty There, a stand-off had…

[theminecraftgay]

Lovesick hopeless romantic and his tall bf

✩ ☆ Commission Me! ☆ ✩