#Madras High Court

[rightnewshindi]

कुणाल कामरा को मद्रास हाई कोर्ट से बड़ी राहत: एकनाथ शिंदे पर 'गद्दार' टिप्पणी के बाद मिली अंतरिम जमानत! #News #HindiNews #IndiaNews #RightNewsIndia

[taxationplanning]

Form 15CB: CA is Not Required To Check Genuineness Of Documents For Issuing Form 15CB: Madras High Court

Form 15CB: CA Is Not Required To Check Genuineness Of Documents Form 15CB Case: Murali Krishna Chakrala vs The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement Judgement in Short: Even on a demurrer, on a perusal of Form 15CB, we find that a Chartered Accountant is required to only examine the nature of the remittance and nothing more. The Chartered Accountant is not required to go into the…

[seemabhatnagar]

Madras High Court Orders Partial Defreezing of Account Amid Cryptocurrency Investigation

Freezing an account indefinitely without informing the account holder violates his fundamental rights. Freezing orders should be specific to the amount under investigation and not disrupt the entire financial life of individual.

Background

The petitioner, Mohammed Saifullah's, bank account, was frozen by HDFC Bank based on the instructions from the Cyber Crime Bureau of Telangana, received via the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.

The account was frozen due to an ongoing investigation into a cybercrime case related to cryptocurrency, in which an amount of Rs. 2,48,835 is suspected to be linked to the crime.

The total balance in the petitioner’s account was Rs. 9,69,580, and he had not been informed for over a year as to why the account was frozen or when it would be unfrozen.

The petitioner approached the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to defreeze his account and release of his balance.

Mohd. Saifullah v. Reserve Bank Of India and 5 others

WP 25631/2024

Before the High Court of Madras

Heard by Hon'ble Dr. Justice G Jayachandran J

Legal Issue

Whether the authorities can freeze a bank account indefinitely without informing the account holder or quantifying the suspected amount, thereby affecting the fundamental rights of the petitioner under Article 19(1)(g) (right to trade and business) and Article 21 (right to livelihood) of the Constitution of India.

Argument of the Parties

Petitioner's Argument

The freezing of his account was without proper communication or justification from the authorities, and without a defined time frame, violating his fundamental rights.

Freezing of his account has seriously impacted his business and financial well-being.

Respondent's Argument

Freezing of the account was based on the ongoing investigation into cybercrime, specifically involving suspected cryptocurrency transactions.

They were acting on instructions from the Cyber Crime Bureau of Telangana and the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.

Court's Observation

While the authorities have the statutory power to freeze bank accounts during investigations, it is essential to ensure that such powers are not exercised arbitrarily.

Freezing the entire account without specifying the amount under suspicion and failing to communicate the reasons to the account holder is not acceptable.

Courts order

HDFC Bank, was ordered to defreeze the petitioner's account, allowing him to operate it with the condition that a lien of ₹2,50,000 is kept on the account. The petitioner must ensure that a minimum balance of ₹2,50,000 is maintained in the account at all times, pending the investigation.

Seema Bhatnagar

[bhaskarlive]

Madras HC directs Studio Green to deposit Rs 1 cr each before releasing ‘Thangalaan’, ‘Kanguva’

The Madras High Court on Monday flagged the release of two big-budget Tamil movies — ‘Thangalan’ starring ‘Chiyaan’ Vikram and ‘Kanguva’ featuring Suriya.

A division bench of the high court comprising Justices G. Jayachandran and C.V. Karthikeyan directed ‘Studio Green’ production company run by K.E. Gnanavelraja to deposit Rs 1 crore each for the two films with the official assignee on or before Wednesday (August 14).

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[lawtoppers]

Madras High Court Ruling on Advocate Stickers; मद्रास उच्च न्यायालयाचे अधिवक्ता स्टीकर वापराबद्दल निर्णय

मद्रास उच्च न्यायालयाने वाहनांवर 'अधिवक्ता स्टीकर' च्या गैरवापराबद्दल महत्त्वपूर्ण निर्णय दिला आहे. जाणून घ्या काय आहे हा निर्णय आणि त्याचे परिणाम.

Madras High Court Ruling on Advocate Stickers Madras High Court Ruling on Advocate Stickers The Madras High Court has issued a significant ruling concerning the misuse of ‘advocate stickers’ on vehicles. The court declared that police authorities have the right to take action against lawyers who misuse these stickers to evade legal obligations or claim immunity from traffic rules and other…

[news-venue]

Madras High Court delivers split verdict on release of Tamil Nadu Minister Senthil Balaji

Justices J Nisha Banu and D Bharatha Chakravarthy gave the ruling on the HCP filed by Balaji's wife against her husband's "illegal detention".

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Tuesday delivered a split verdict on a habeas corpus petition (HCP) seeking to declare Tamil Nadu Minister V Senthil Balaji’s arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on money laundering charges was illegal and setting him free.

While Justice J Nisha Banu, presiding the bench, held that the HCP is maintainable and the ED was not entrusted to get police custody under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and ordered setting Senthil Balaji free, Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy dissented saying the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner has not made out a case to prove the remand was illegal.

The dissenting judge ruled that ED is entitled to take him under custody.

“It is in the interest of the detenue that he was admitted to the hospital due to his health condition. He was not under the custody of the ED for even a minute. So, the hospitalisation period can be excluded from the first fifteen days and the ED is entitled to take him under custody,” the dissenting judge ruled.

He ordered, “Therefore, HCP shall stand dismissed. The period from June 14 till such time the accused is fit for custody of the respondent shall be deducted from the initial period of fifteen days. The detenue accused shall continue to take treatment at the Kauvery Hospital until discharge or for a period of ten days from today or whichever is earlier. Thereafter, if he requires further treatment, it can be done only at the prison hospital.”

Since the judges differed on the matter, it will be placed before Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala for further orders.

The HCP was filed by Megala, wife of Senthil Balaji, after he was arrested by the ED in the wee hours of June 14 after a marathon search and grilling at his official residence.

After complaining of chest pain, he was admitted to the Govt Multi-Speciality Hospital where the doctors diagnosed him with blocks in the heart and recommended immediate surgery.

Based on an interim order of the division bench on the HCP, he was shifted to Kauvery Hospital and underwent bypass surgery.

In the meantime, the principal sessions court, which had ordered his judicial custody for fourteen days, granted police custody for the ED to interrogate him subject to his health conditions.

Since the doctors advised against custodial interrogation, the ED gave up the exercise.

Senthil Balaji was booked under PMLA by the ED in 2021 based on the FIR filed by the Central Crime Branch, of Chennai City police, on the cash-for-jobs scam committed when he was the Transport Minster during the AIADMK government.

[rightnewshindi]

कुणाल कामरा का नया तंज: नारायणमूर्ति के 70 घंटे काम पर चुटकी, सुधा मूर्ति की सादगी पर सवाल

Mumbai News: मशहूर स्टैंड-अप कॉमेडियन कुणाल कामरा एक बार फिर अपने तीखे व्यंग्य के लिए सुर्खियों में हैं। अपने हालिया शो ‘नया भारत’ में उन्होंने इंफोसिस के सह-संस्थापक नारायणमूर्ति और उनकी पत्नी सुधा मूर्ति को निशाने पर लिया। नारायणमूर्ति के ‘सप्ताह में 70 घंटे काम’ वाले बयान पर चुटकी लेते हुए कामरा ने सुधा मूर्ति की ‘सादगी’ को भी मजेदार अंदाज में कटघरे में खड़ा किया। लेकिन यह शो सिर्फ इस जोड़ी तक…

[youthchronical]

Madras High Court rejects election petition against DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran

DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran. File | Photo Credit: R. Ashok The Madras High Court on Friday (March 7, 2025) allowed an application filed by Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) Member of Parliament (MP) Dayanidhi Maran, while rejecting an election petition challenging his victory from the Chennai Central Lok Sabha constituency in 2024. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh ordered the deletion of most of the…

[ansh-blogs]

Court orders Erode Collector to respond to case seeking ban on construction of Christian church on Nadham outer land

Chennai: The Madras High Court has ordered the Erode District Collector and others to respond in a case seeking a ban on the construction of Christian churches on Nattam Purumpoku land against the Supreme Court order and the Tamil Nadu government’s order. In the Public Interest Petition filed by Jaganathan from Erode in the Madras High Court, “There is a government-owned Natham Puramboku land in…

[seemabhatnagar]

"Judiciary Intervenes: Petitioner’s Trust Activities Deemed Harmful to Public Morality"

In a surprising legal twist, the Madras High Court recently dismissed petitions challenging police actions and charges against an individual. The court’s decision was based on compelling evidence that pointed to serious offenses, including the potential exploitation of a minor. Notably, the petitioner had sought protection to run a brothel, a request that raised eyebrows in legal circles.

The court’s reasoning emphasized the need to maintain the reputation of advocates in society. It urged the Bar Council to enroll only graduates from reputable law colleges, highlighting the importance of legal education and ethical conduct.

As part of its ruling, the court demanded that the petitioner provide proof of enrollment and educational qualifications. This case serves as a stark reminder that legal actions can have far-reaching consequences, and the judiciary remains vigilant in upholding justice.

Raja Murrugan v. The SP Nagercoil Kanyakumari District & 2 others

Crl. Pet. 9399/2024 & WP 13963/2024

Before Madras High Court

Heard by Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Pugalendhi J

The petitioner, Raja Murrugan, filed two petitions: a criminal original petition for quashing the FIR lodged against him alleging false accusations and harassment by the police, and a writ petition seeking protection for his trust, "Friends For Ever Trust," which provides services including consensual sexual activities.

Facts:

The petitioner claims to be the founder of "Friends For Ever Trust," registered under Reg.No.147 of 2022, promoting adult recreation and related activities, including oil baths and consensual sex services.

On 17.02.2024, the police searched the trust premises, arrested the petitioner, and registered a case under various sections of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The petitioner was arrested and later released on bail. He alleges that the case was orchestrated by his ex-wife using a minor girl to frame him.

Legal Issue: Whether the activities conducted by the petitioner's trust constitute legal consensual services or illegal activities under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and POCSO Act.

Points of Arguments

Petitioner's arguments- The petitioner vigorously defended actions as consensual and well within the bounds of privacy. The petitioner submitted that the activities of the "Friends For Ever Trust" were lawful and did not constitute a criminal offense.

Consensual and Legal: The petitioner maintained that the activities involved consenting adults and were conducted within a framework of trust. He argued that these private interactions should not be subject to state interference or criminalization.

Privacy Rights: Citing the Indian Constitution’s recognition of the Right to Privacy, the petitioner contended that their personal liberty included the freedom to make choices—specifically, engaging in consensual activities with other adults. He argued that the state’s actions is an infringement on his fundamental right.

False Complaint Allegations: The petitioner further claimed that the police action stemmed from a false complaint orchestrated by his ex-wife. He challenged the legitimacy of the charges and emphasized the need for a fair investigation.

Consensual Nature of Activities: The petitioner asserted that the trust provided a platform for consenting adults to engage in relationships and activities of their choice. He argued that since all activities were consensual and among adults, they fell within the realm of personal freedom and should not be criminalized.

Absence of Illegal Actions: The petitioner maintained that there was no evidence of illegal actions, exploitation, or coercion in the trust's activities. He emphasized that the trust was not involved in any activities that could be classified as criminal under Indian law, such as trafficking, forced labor, or any other form of exploitation.

Argument of the State

Legitimate Investigation: The State justified initiating the investigation based on credible information pointing to potential illegal activities within the “Friends For Ever Trust.”

Concerns of Illegality: Despite the trust’s claims of operating within legal bounds, serious concerns arose. Allegations hinted at activities that might breach Indian laws, including immoral trafficking or exploitation.

Public Interest and Protection: The State underscored its duty to safeguard the public interest and prevent harm to societal morals. The investigation aimed to shield vulnerable individuals and maintain order.

Criminal Proceedings Justified: Filing the FIR and pursuing criminal proceedings were grounded in prima facie evidence gathered during the investigation. Authorities acted to uphold the law.

No Fundamental Rights Violation: The State refuted any infringement on the petitioner’s fundamental rights. Privacy and personal liberty, they argued, don’t shield illegal activities or actions contrary to public welfare.

Court's Observation

The court expressed shock at the petitioner's claim of running a brothel under the guise of a trust and his purported status as an advocate. The allegations involved immoral trafficking and potential exploitation of women under the guise of running a charitable trust, which is a serious offense. The nature of the allegations, if proven true, could indicate severe misconduct and abuse of trust, as well as violations of legal and moral standards.

The court noted the discrepancies in the petitioner's statements and the seriousness of the allegations involving a minor.

The court emphasized the need for maintaining moral sanctity and preventing exploitation under the guise of consensual activities.

The court was concerned about the actual activities carried out by the "Friends For Ever Trust." Although the trust was purported to be involved in charitable activities, there were serious allegations suggesting that the trust's operations may have included illegal activities. The court likely found it disturbing that such activities could be taking place under the cover of a charitable organization, which generally enjoys a certain level of public trust and immunity.

The court was shocked by the implications of the case for public morality and the enforcement of laws protecting vulnerable individuals from exploitation. The potential involvement of a trust in illegal activities, especially one that may exploit vulnerable women, raises significant concerns about the protection of societal values and the effectiveness of law enforcement.

[bestchennailawyers]

Best Criminal Lawyers in Chennai: Your Guide to Top Rated Criminal Advocates

When it comes to criminal defense, finding the right lawyer is paramount. Chennai, with its vibrant legal landscape, boasts some of the most skilled and experienced criminal lawyers in India. Whether you are dealing with serious charges or need representation in complex legal matters, having a top-rated criminal advocate by your side can make a significant difference. This blog post will guide you through the process of finding the best criminal lawyers in Chennai, focusing on the qualities that make an attorney stand out and the reasons why you need the best representation in the Madras High Court.

Why You Need a Top Criminal Lawyer

Criminal cases can be intricate and demanding, requiring a deep understanding of the law, strong advocacy skills, and the ability to navigate the complexities of the legal system. Here’s why having one of the best criminal attorneys in Madras High Court is crucial:

Expertise and Experience: Top criminal lawyers bring years of experience and specialized knowledge to your case.

Strategic Defense: They can formulate effective defense strategies to protect your rights.

Negotiation Skills: Skilled lawyers can negotiate plea bargains or reduced sentences.

Courtroom Representation: Their experience in court proceedings ensures competent representation.

Reputation and Network: Established lawyers have a good rapport with the judiciary, which can be advantageous.

Qualities of the Best Criminal Lawyers in Chennai

When searching for the best criminal lawyers in Chennai, consider the following qualities:

Extensive Knowledge of Criminal Law: The lawyer should have a thorough understanding of criminal law and procedures.

Proven Track Record: Look for a history of successful case outcomes and satisfied clients.

Strong Analytical Skills: The ability to analyze cases from multiple angles is crucial.

Excellent Communication Skills: Clear and effective communication with clients and in court is essential.

Integrity and Professionalism: A top lawyer should be ethical and maintain high professional standards.

Finding the Best Criminal Attorneys in Madras High Court

Here are some steps to help you find the best criminal lawyers in Chennai:

1. Research Online

Start by researching online. Websites like Criminal Advocate provide valuable information about top-rated criminal advocates. Look for detailed profiles, client reviews, and case studies to get an idea of their expertise and success rate.

2. Ask for Referrals

Word of mouth is a powerful tool. Ask friends, family, or colleagues for recommendations. If someone you trust has had a positive experience with a criminal lawyer, it’s worth considering.

3. Check Credentials and Experience

Verify the lawyer’s credentials, including their education, certifications, and years of practice. Experience in handling cases similar to yours is a significant advantage.

4. Schedule Consultations

Most lawyers offer initial consultations. Use this opportunity to discuss your case, ask questions, and assess whether the lawyer is a good fit for you.

5. Read Client Testimonials

Client testimonials can provide insight into a lawyer’s capabilities and how they handle their cases. Look for consistent positive feedback regarding their professionalism, communication, and successful outcomes.

Top Rated Criminal Advocates in Chennai

Proven Expertise in Various Criminal Cases

The best criminal attorneys in Madras High Court have proven expertise in handling a wide range of criminal cases, including:

White-Collar Crimes: Fraud, embezzlement, and corporate crimes.

Violent Crimes: Assault, murder, and domestic violence.

Drug Offenses: Possession, trafficking, and distribution.

Cyber Crimes: Hacking, identity theft, and online fraud.

High Success Rate

Top-rated criminal advocates have a high success rate in defending their clients, often securing acquittals, reduced charges, or favorable plea deals.

Strong Reputation

Reputable lawyers have built their standing through years of dedicated service and successful case outcomes. Their reputation can be a significant asset in court proceedings.

Conclusion

Choosing the right criminal lawyer is crucial for ensuring a strong defense and the best possible outcome in your case. Chennai offers a pool of highly skilled and experienced criminal lawyers who can provide expert legal representation. Whether you’re facing minor charges or serious allegations, having one of the best criminal attorneys in Madras High Court by your side can make all the difference. For more information and to find the top-rated criminal advocates in Chennai, visit criminaladvocate.in. With the right legal guidance, you can navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system and protect your rights effectively.

[lawtoppers]

Madras High Court Denies Bail to YouTuber G Felix Gerald Over Savukku Shankar Interview

Madras High Court's decision highlights the balance between free speech and legal accountability in the digital age. Read more about the implications for digital media and content creators.

Madras High Court’s Decision on YouTuber G Felix Gerald Madras High Court’s Decision on YouTuber G Felix Gerald Published on June 25, 2024 Background and Allegations The Madras High Court recently refused bail to YouTuber G Felix Gerald, who was booked for his interview with Savukku Shankar. The case has garnered significant attention due to its implications for freedom of expression and the…

[newspatron]

Foreign Funding in India: Unraveling the Web of Transparency and Security

Together, we can contribute to a society that values truthfulness, transparency, and security.

From the Editor’s Desk at NewsPatron as it’s time for all of us to collectively delve into the intricacies of foreign funding cases in India. In this post, we’ll explore the background, context, and crucial aspects of these incidents—helping our society move towards truthfulness, transparency, and security. Subscribe to NewspatronUnderstanding the Influence of a Significant Group in Our…

[radicalcoffeeclub]

Some interesting news from India!

In its verdict, the court said that the wife had contributed equally towards acquiring family assets by doing domestic chores. It said that the "contribution made by either the husband by earning or the wife by serving and looking after the family and children" would mean that "both are entitled equally to whatever they earned by their joint effort". It did not matter in whose name the property was bought - the spouse who looked and cared after the family would be entitled to an equal share in them. The court also held that the woman's domestic labour contributed indirectly to earning the money that enabled the purchase of the assets and that her work allowed the husband to be gainfully employed.

The wife works for 24 hours in various roles, including that of a chef, a "home doctor" and a "home economist", the court said. In the absence of the homemaker's duties, the husband would have to pay for the services these roles provided.

Women's rights lawyer Flavia Agnes called it a "very positive judgement because it recognises women's domestic labour". Malavika Rajkotia, a family and property lawyer, said the verdict was "a very important milestone", one that women had been "trying to evolve and plead in their various cases".

"This is, for the first time, a meaningful recognition of the homemaker's right." So the hope is that the judgement could have a positive impact in future.